725 Kihapai Place
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
725 Kihapai Place
Building Overview
725 Kihapai Place in Kailua, built in 1955; pets allowed and short-term rentals prohibited according to MLS data.
About 725 Kihapai Place
725 Kihapai Place is a residential building located in the Kailua neighborhood, originally built in 1955. According to available records, specific details about building size and construction type are not specified in the MLS data provided.
Key features and policies noted in the MLS include that pets are allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company for the property is listed as unknown in the available MLS information.
Additional details such as parking arrangements, maintenance fees, insurance, or other building amenities are not included in the supplied MLS data. Based on MLS data; buyers should verify all building specifics, policies, and fee information with the listing agent or managing entity prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 1 of 4 current listings shows OTCOEX (common electric) in the MLS checkboxes and none of the public remarks mention 'common area electricity' or similar phrasing. This pattern suggests agents are not consistently reporting common-electric as included and it's likely not a standard included fee across the building, but the evidence is implied rather than explicit.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the five listings mention hot water as included in the maintenance fee. Four of five list WTRHTR, and all five omit HOTWAT, providing strong consistent evidence that hot water is not included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All five current listings show SEWER included in association fees. No public remarks explicitly discuss sewer, but the consistent checkbox data across every listing strongly supports inclusion.
All five listings show WATER included in association fees. No remarks mention water fees, but the agreement across all listings provides strong evidence that water is included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 5 of 5 current listings include WASHER/DRYER in the MLS data, and 3 listings explicitly mention laundry details such as “full size combo washer/dryer” or “combo washer/dryer.” The repeated confirmation across listings, together with previously high confidence, strongly supports that in-unit laundry is available.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 4 current MLS listings list parking features (OPEN/CO/GARAGE/ASSIGN), and the public remarks repeatedly mention on-site parking such as 'your own front door parking space' and '1 assigned parking stall.' Evidence is consistent across listings and agents, indicating the building provides parking.
Assigned parking is strongly supported across the listing history and current data. Three of the five current remarks explicitly mention assigned parking, while another describes an own front-door parking space; all 5 current MLS records also include ASSIGN in parking_features, consistent with the previously high-confidence evidence.
No analysis available
Multiple listings describe assigned or private parking, indicating a designated space. However, assigned parking does not establish deeded ownership, and no explicit deeded-parking language was found.
No analysis available
The remarks mention low HOA or maintenance fees but do not identify any additional fee specifically for parking. Therefore, no public-remarks evidence supports a separate parking fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings describe assigned or private parking but do not mention parking availability being subject to a waitlist. There is no evidence in the remarks of a building parking waitlist.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Building-level evidence: 2 of 4 current MLS listings include ACWIUN in inclusions and the provided public remarks explicitly say "window ACs, fans in each room" (and elsewhere mention "split A/C"). At least one agent's detailed remarks directly reference window ACs, and MLS checkbox data supports it, so include window_ac = true with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Three of five current listings identify HOLTIL in the construction materials. No listing explicitly mentions “hollow tile” or “hollow tile construction,” so the evidence is moderate and relies primarily on MLS metadata rather than consistent agent remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks (0/4 listings) reference a 'concrete slab' or 'solid concrete foundation'. Although 1/4 MLS entries list SLAB, there is no confirming language in agent remarks, so the evidence for slab foundation is weak and probably a checkbox mistake.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Three of five listings identify ABOGRO in the construction materials. The listings repeatedly describe ground-floor or first-floor units, but do not explicitly say “above ground construction” or “above ground building”; support is therefore based mainly on current MLS coding.
No analysis available
Four of five listings code the building as SINWAL. The remarks do not contain phrases such as “single wall,” “traditional single wall,” or “old Hawaiian style single wall,” meaning the evidence is fairly strong in MLS data but not independently confirmed by multiple agents.
The remarks refer generally to investment potential but do not state that short-term rentals are permitted. Because there is no public-remarks evidence of STR approval, this is treated as false with low-to-medium confidence.
The listings contain no references to a hotel rental pool or hotel rental program. Since STR permission is not supported by the remarks, this feature is also false under the prerequisite rule.
The remarks do not describe any rental pool, much less mandatory participation in one. Because STR permission is not established, mandatory hotel-pool participation must also be false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks do not identify the property as leasehold or provide a lease expiration or renewal year. No specific four-digit lease expiry year can be extracted.
The remarks were searched for references such as “VA approved,” “VA financing,” and “VA loans accepted.” None were found, so there is no public-remarks evidence that the building is VA loan approved.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listing remarks (at least 3 of the 4 remark sections) explicitly mention mountain/Ko'olau/mauka views — e.g., 'Breathtaking mountain views greet you right from your front door' and 'scenic views of our amazing Ko'olau mountains.' MLS checkbox data is mixed, but the repeated, explicit remarks across different agent write-ups indicate the building does offer mountain views to some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the five listings mention sunset views; two explicitly list NONE for views. The only view references are mountain/Ko'olau or scenic nature-preserve views, so there is no support that the building offers sunset views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.