400 Keawe
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
400 Keawe
Building Overview
400 Keawe in Ala Moana-Kakaako, built 2016; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed (based on MLS data).
About 400 Keawe
400 Keawe is a residential building located in the Ala Moana–Kakaako neighborhood. According to available records, it was built in 2016. Size and construction type are not specified in the MLS data provided.
Key policies noted in the MLS information include no pets allowed and no short-term rentals permitted. Other building amenities and unit features are not listed in the available MLS summary.
The MLS data does not identify a management company and does not provide details about parking, maintenance fees, or additional policies. Based on MLS data; buyers should independently verify all building details, rules, fees, and amenity information with the listing agent or managing entity.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The MLS floor fields and floor numbers encoded in units agree at 6, and the state registration also reports 6 floors. The county parcel's max_floors of 2 is inconsistent with these building-specific sources.
The county assessor reports 96 reconciled residential units, and the state registration independently reports 96 units for one building. These sources support the currently stored value.
Owner occupancy from AOUO registration(s) 7594. Refreshed by Real_Estate_Scraper/reb_registry/propagate_owner_occupancy.py, which this lock does not block.
The remarks directly confirm that the building has two elevators. This matches the current value and no conflicting elevator count was found.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Five of nine listings indicate OTCOEX, supporting that common-area electricity may be included in the maintenance fee. However, no listing remarks confirm this detail, so the evidence is moderate and could reflect copied MLS checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the available remarks, there are no explicit mentions of hot water being included in the maintenance fee, while the MLS data is strongly consistent in the opposite direction (0/8 HOTWAT; 6/8 WTRHTR). This looks like a building where units have their own water heaters, so hot water is not a shared fee-included amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Eight of nine listings state that sewer is included in the association fees. No public remarks quote 'sewer included' or otherwise explain the fee coverage, so confidence is good but not definitive because the checkbox may have been copied across listings.
Eight of nine listings indicate that water is included in the association fees. The public remarks do not independently confirm this, so the evidence is strong in the MLS data but lacks explicit narrative verification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings explicitly mention a dog park or dog run, and there are 0/8 remark matches for that feature. The only relevant language is generic pet-friendly wording, which is not enough to confirm a dedicated dog park/pet area. Current evidence suggests the MLS amenity checkbox is likely erroneous.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
2 of the 8 public remarks explicitly mention outdoor space via a lanai, including phrases like "private lanai" and "122 sqft lanai." This suggests patio/deck-type outdoor space is available in at least some units, even though the MLS amenity appears only once and may be underchecked or inconsistently copied.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
TRACHU appears in 7 of 9 current MLS amenity records, supporting that 400 Keawe offers a building-level trash chute. No public remarks mention a trash chute, so the checkbox evidence may reflect repeated MLS data entry and is not independently confirmed by multiple agent descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the building: at least five current remarks explicitly mention a full-size washer/dryer or W/D, including "full size washer/dryer," "full-size W/D," and "Full-size GE stacked washer/dryer." This aligns with the MLS data showing washer/dryer included in 9 of 9 listings and is confirmed by multiple distinct listing descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Assigned parking is strongly supported across the listings. At least four remarks explicitly mention assigned, designated, or multiple parking stalls, including "one assigned parking stall" and "2-parking stalls," and the current MLS data marks ASSIGN in 8 of 9 listings.
Covered parking is directly confirmed by the phrase "secured, covered and located on the ground floor." Although only one current remark states this explicitly, the historical evidence was high confidence and current MLS data includes covered or garage indicators in 3 of 9 listings.
Several listings reference one or two parking stalls, including assigned and ground-level stalls. However, the remarks do not explicitly say the stalls are deeded, owned, or included in the unit deed.
No analysis available
The remarks describe parking as assigned, secured, covered, or included with units but do not state any separate parking charge. No monthly parking fee can be confirmed.
No analysis available
Secured parking entry is supported by 6 of 9 current MLS records and a direct remark stating the parking stall is "secured." Additional remarks describe the building as secured and having a "secure lobby," providing corroborating evidence across listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks reference available parking stalls and guest parking but do not mention a parking waitlist, queue, or need to join a waiting list. No waitlist system is evidenced.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 5 remark entries mention individual-unit cooling, including “built-in AC units in each room” and several references to “split A/C.” Combined with ACWIUN being selected in 6/9 current listings, this supports including the feature, although some split-A/C wording appears repeated and does not conclusively identify window units.
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS data, with 9 of 9 current listings identifying CONCRE as the construction material. Remarks consistently describe 400 Keawe as a 2016 new-construction, low-rise building, providing contextual support even without explicitly using the word “concrete.”
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks mention “above ground construction,” “above ground building,” or similar language across the 9 listings. Although 1 of 9 listings contains the ABOGRO checkbox, the lack of corroboration and isolated occurrence make this evidence too weak to include the feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks contain no explicit indication that short-term rentals or vacation rentals are permitted. They also do not state a prohibition, so STR allowance cannot be confirmed from the remarks.
No remarks mention a hotel rental pool, hotel-managed rental program, or branded hotel participation. Because STR permission is not established, the hotel-pool feature is false under the prerequisite rule.
The remarks do not mention required hotel-pool participation, mandatory rental programs, or an inability to opt out. Since STR allowance is not established, mandatory hotel-pool participation must be false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No leasehold, ground lease, lease expiration, or renewal language was found. Because no specific lease expiry year is provided, the value remains unknown.
The remarks do not mention VA approval, VA financing, or acceptance of VA loans. VA eligibility cannot be confirmed from the available public remarks.
I searched for explicit language such as fully insured, full insurance, comprehensive building insurance, or walls-in coverage. No such statement was found; the hurricane-insurance reference alone does not establish full insurance coverage.
One listing explicitly mentions that 'the building is equipped with fire sprinklers,' while 5 of 9 current listings include the FIRSPR amenity. The checkbox evidence is moderately broad, and the explicit remark provides strong confirmation from at least one listing.
I searched for explicit references to FLSE passage, fire/life safety evaluation approval, fire safety certification, life safety compliance, or a passed fire inspection. None were found, so there is insufficient evidence to confirm this feature.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
1 of 9 listings explicitly mentions 'breathtaking ocean views' and a private lanai with that view. This is strong direct evidence that ocean-view units are available in the building, even though the feature is not present in every listing.
No analysis available
No listing remarks explicitly mention Diamond Head views or a view of Diamond Head crater. The only related wording is "cooler Diamond Head side," which appears to refer to the unit’s exposure/orientation rather than an actual Diamond Head view. With mixed MLS entries and no confirming remarks across multiple listings, this does not look like a reliable building feature.
4 of 9 listings have CITY in the MLS view descriptions, but none of the provided remarks explicitly say 'city view,' 'cityscape,' or 'downtown view.' The evidence is therefore mixed and may partly reflect checkbox usage, but the current MLS data indicates that some units are marketed with city views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.