400 Keawe
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
400 Keawe
Building Overview
400 Keawe in Ala Moana-Kakaako, built 2016; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed (based on MLS data).
About 400 Keawe
400 Keawe is a residential building located in the Ala Moana–Kakaako neighborhood. According to available records, it was built in 2016. Size and construction type are not specified in the MLS data provided.
Key policies noted in the MLS information include no pets allowed and no short-term rentals permitted. Other building amenities and unit features are not listed in the available MLS summary.
The MLS data does not identify a management company and does not provide details about parking, maintenance fees, or additional policies. Based on MLS data; buyers should independently verify all building details, rules, fees, and amenity information with the listing agent or managing entity.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for any owner-occupancy percentage or qualitative indicators such as '80% owner occupied' or 'majority owner occupied' and found none. Because there is no explicit evidence in the remarks, this remains unknown.
I found a direct mention of the elevator count in the remarks, so this is set to 2. No conflicting remarks were found.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the available remarks, there are no explicit mentions of hot water being included in the maintenance fee, while the MLS data is strongly consistent in the opposite direction (0/8 HOTWAT; 6/8 WTRHTR). This looks like a building where units have their own water heaters, so hot water is not a shared fee-included amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings explicitly mention a dog park or dog run, and there are 0/8 remark matches for that feature. The only relevant language is generic pet-friendly wording, which is not enough to confirm a dedicated dog park/pet area. Current evidence suggests the MLS amenity checkbox is likely erroneous.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
2 of the 8 public remarks explicitly mention outdoor space via a lanai, including phrases like "private lanai" and "122 sqft lanai." This suggests patio/deck-type outdoor space is available in at least some units, even though the MLS amenity appears only once and may be underchecked or inconsistently copied.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is well supported for this building. Multiple listings explicitly mention it, including phrases like 'full size washer/dryer,' 'full-size W/D,' and 'GE stacked washer/dryer,' and the current MLS data shows 8/8 listings with washer/dryer in inclusions. The evidence is consistent across multiple remarks and appears to be a real building feature rather than a copy-paste mistake.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Assigned parking is strongly supported by the remarks: at least 4 listings explicitly mention an assigned stall, 2 parking spaces, or 2-parking stalls. The language is consistent across listings and does not read like a one-off copy error, so this appears to be a real building feature.
Covered parking is directly mentioned in at least 1 listing with the phrase "secured, covered and located on the ground floor," and other listings reference ground-level stalls consistent with garage/covered parking. While fewer listings mention it than assigned parking, the explicit wording is strong enough to confirm the feature.
I found multiple references to parking stalls being assigned or included, including 2 parking stalls and one assigned parking stall. However, there is no explicit language indicating the stalls are deeded/owned with the unit.
No analysis available
I searched for any stated parking charge, monthly fee, or rental cost and found none. The remarks describe parking as assigned or included, but do not mention a separate fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any reference to a parking waitlist, joining a list, or limited parking availability tied to a queue, and found nothing. The remarks only describe parking stalls included with units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window/wall-style AC appears to be offered in at least some units in this building. 3+ remarks mention cooling such as "built-in AC units in each room," "split A/C," and "year-old split AC in both the bedroom and living room," suggesting the building has unit-level AC availability, though some listings may be using different terminology. Because the MLS inclusions are mixed and the remarks are not uniformly specific to window units, this is a moderate-confidence building feature.
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS data: 8 out of 8 current listings mark the building as CONCRE in construction materials. The remarks do not explicitly say “concrete,” but they consistently describe the building as a 2016 low-rise/new construction, which fits the MLS material data and suggests this is a stable building-level attribute rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators such as STR allowed, NUC, TVU, hotel rental program language, or 30-day minimum rules and found none. With no public remark supporting STR use, it is treated as not allowed here.
I looked for hotel pool language such as hotel rental program, managed by hotel, or branded pool participation and found nothing. Since there is also no evidence that STR is allowed, this must remain false.
I searched for language indicating mandatory hotel-rental-pool participation and found none. There is also no evidence of STR allowance, so this remains false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for ground lease language such as lease expiry, leasehold expiration, or a renewal date, but nothing was stated. Based on the remarks provided, the lease expiry year is unknown.
I searched the public remarks for any reference to VA approval or VA financing and found none. With no explicit mention, I cannot confirm VA eligibility from these listings.
I looked for explicit insurance language indicating full HOA walls-in coverage or comprehensive building insurance, but only found a reference to hurricane insurance. That is not enough to conclude the building is fully insured by the HOA, so this remains false based on absence of evidence.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit fire/life safety evaluation language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection, and found nothing. The presence of fire sprinklers is helpful but does not prove the evaluation was passed, so I am not marking this true.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing remarks explicitly mention Diamond Head views or a view of Diamond Head crater. The only related wording is "cooler Diamond Head side," which appears to refer to the unit’s exposure/orientation rather than an actual Diamond Head view. With mixed MLS entries and no confirming remarks across multiple listings, this does not look like a reliable building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.