2987 Kalakaua
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
2987 Kalakaua
Building Overview
2987 Kalakaua in Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis: 7-story concrete building (1953) with ocean and mountain views; assigned parking, no pets or short-term rentals.
About 2987 Kalakaua
2987 Kalakaua is a seven-story concrete residential building located in the Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1953 and features ocean, mountain and sunset views.
Based on MLS data, key features include assigned parking and view-oriented units. Pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted according to the provided information. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data.
Buyers should verify all details independently; this summary is based solely on MLS-derived information and does not include unit counts, HOA fees, or other specifics that may be relevant to a purchase.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
8 of 12 current listings include OTCOEX in association_fee_includes. Remarks across the listings talk about low maintenance fees and building management, but do not specifically call out common area electricity, so this appears to be driven by MLS data rather than explicit agent descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
10 of 12 current listings include HOTWAT, and 0 of 12 list WTRHTR. The remarks do not contradict this, and the absence of water-heater inclusions makes hot water inclusion highly likely for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 12 current listings include SEWER in association_fee_includes. This is consistent across the dataset and appears to be a stable building-level inclusion rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
All 12 current listings include WATER in association_fee_includes. The consistency across listings strongly indicates water is a standard building expense covered by the HOA/maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS amenities currently list patio/deck on 9 of 11 listings, and at least seven of the public remarks explicitly mention outdoor spaces: phrases include "Lanai", "large lanai", "enclosed lanai", "Juliet balcony", and "sliders... seamlessly blending indoor and outdoor living." Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and aligns with the MLS checkboxes, so the building is reported to offer patio/deck amenities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, or similar amenity language and found no evidence. The listings emphasize surfing access and nearby surf spots, but not storage for boards.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for saltwater pool language such as saltwater, saline, or salt pool and found nothing. The current building context also says the building has no pool, so this feature is not supported.
No analysis available
Shared/community laundry appears to be an available building feature based on MLS data: 10 of 12 current listings include the COMLAU amenity. However, the public remarks in the provided listings do not explicitly mention a laundry room, coin laundry, or other shared laundry facility, so the evidence is moderate rather than explicit.
I looked for terms such as coin laundry, coin-op, quarters, card-operated machines, or laundry fees and found no evidence. The remarks do not describe any shared laundry system at all.
I searched the remarks for wording like "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," or similar language and found nothing. The only laundry reference is an in-unit washer/dryer, which does not indicate community laundry on every floor.
Parking is strongly supported across the remarks: multiple listings explicitly mention parking stalls, including "one deeded and assigned parking stall," "dedicated parking stall #15," and "1 covered parking." This appears consistent across several agents/listings rather than a one-off checkbox issue.
Assigned parking is clearly supported by both MLS checkbox data and remarks. Several listings directly describe the stall as "deeded and assigned" or otherwise dedicated, so this is not just copied MLS data but repeatedly stated in the public remarks.
No analysis available
The remarks repeatedly reference deeded/assigned parking, which is strong public evidence that the stall is owned with the unit. This is consistent across listings and supports a high-confidence true value.
No analysis available
I searched for language about parking fees, parking rental, or any additional monthly cost tied to parking and found nothing. The listings describe parking as included or assigned, but do not mention a separate fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist, waiting list, or instructions to join a parking queue and found none. There is no public remark evidence that parking is waitlisted in this building.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit card/fob access wording and found none. The remarks mention a security gate, but that is not the same as a card-access system.
No analysis available
I searched for any indication of patrol service or roving security and found nothing. A security gate is mentioned, but there is no evidence of an actual security patrol.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence supports concrete construction. All current MLS listings list CONCRE, and public remarks are consistent with a concrete-built building rather than a copied checkbox. This appears to be a stable building characteristic confirmed across the dataset.
Double wall construction is not supported by the public remarks, and the MLS evidence is limited to a minority of listings. The pattern looks more like inconsistent checkbox usage than confirmed building construction details. No strong evidence indicates the building should be tagged with double wall construction.
No analysis available
The current MLS data only shows a minority of listings with MASSTU, and none of the public remarks explicitly reference masonry or stucco construction. That makes the checkbox look like possible MLS copy/paste noise rather than a confirmed building feature. No strong evidence supports including it as a building-level characteristic.
No analysis available
The MLS data shows slab in a minority of listings, and the remarks provide indirect support through references to "finished concrete floors" and similar concrete/renovation language. However, no remark explicitly says "concrete slab" or "solid concrete foundation," so this remains an inferred rather than directly confirmed building feature. The evidence is moderate and may reflect MLS copy/paste rather than explicit verification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for short-term rental indicators such as STR permitted, vacation rental allowed, NUC, TVU, or minimum-stay exceptions and found none. With no public evidence that short-term rentals are allowed, this is set to false with low confidence.
I looked for hotel pool language such as hotel rental pool, managed by hotel, or branded pool programs and found none. Since there is no evidence of STR allowance or hotel-pool participation, this is false.
I searched for language indicating required participation in a rental pool and found nothing. There is also no evidence of any hotel program here, so mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold wording such as ground lease, lease expiry, leasehold expiring, or a renewal year and found none. The remarks instead identify the building/property as fee simple, so there is no lease expiration year to extract.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," and "VA loans accepted" and found nothing. With no public evidence indicating VA eligibility, this is left as false with low confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are extremely well supported across the listings: 11 of 12 MLS view_descriptions mention OCEAN, and the remarks repeatedly describe the building as 'oceanfront' with 'gorgeous ocean views' and the 'Pacific Ocean' at the doorstep. This is consistent across multiple agents and reads like shared building-level reality rather than copy-paste noise.
Mountain-related views are supported by both MLS data and remarks. Six of 12 listings include mountain view language, and the remarks specifically reference 'mauka' exposure, 'Ko'olau Mountains,' and 'Full Diamond Head View,' which is strong corroboration across listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Coastline views are supported by consistent MLS and remark evidence. Seven of 12 listings include coastline language, and the remarks refer to a 'treasured stretch of coastline' and coastal setting, indicating this is a real building-level view characteristic.
Implied presence across some listings: 3 of 11 MLS entries list garden views and remarks refer to 'lush tropical landscaping', 'private yard', and indoor-outdoor connections to landscaping. This suggests some units overlook landscaped or garden areas, though the language is more implied than repeatedly explicit.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunrise evidence is weaker than the other view types. Only 3 of 12 MLS entries mention SUNRIS, and the remarks provide mostly indirect support rather than explicit 'sunrise view' phrasing, so this looks like a partial building-level feature rather than a universally described one.
Sunset views are well established for this building. Six of 12 MLS view_descriptions include SUNSET, and the remarks repeatedly use direct phrases like 'The Sunsets are breathtaking,' 'direct sunset view over the ocean,' and 'breathtaking sunsets all year round.'
No analysis available
The remarks explicitly say fireworks were visible from the lanai, which satisfies the requirement for a fireworks view from the building. This is direct unit-level viewing evidence rather than just proximity to fireworks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.