2765 Kapiolani
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
2765 Kapiolani
Building Overview
2765 Kapiolani in McCully-Moiliili — built 1958; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About 2765 Kapiolani
Based on MLS data, 2765 Kapiolani is a residential building located in the McCully-Moiliili neighborhood and was built in 1958. Size, number of units, and construction type are not specified in the available MLS records.
According to available records, the building does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. No other amenities or common-area details are provided in the MLS information.
MLS-derived data for this building is limited. Buyers should verify unit size, construction details, parking availability, maintenance fees, and management or HOA contact information with the listing agent or property records before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for any owner-occupancy percentage or descriptive phrasing about the resident mix, but found none. Since this is a numeric field and there is no prior value or explicit remark, the correct status is unknown.
I looked for explicit elevator references such as "elevators," "multiple elevators," or a stated count, and none were found. The remarks do describe the building as a "3 story walk-up," which is strong evidence that there are no elevators serving the building.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit language like deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in deed. The remarks only show assigned/reserved parking in one listing and no parking in others, so deeded parking is not established.
No analysis available
I looked for any stated parking rent or monthly parking charge. The listings discuss parking availability, but none specify a parking fee, so this is unknown.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for any reference to a parking waitlist, join-the-waitlist language, or similar parking queue system. Nothing in the remarks indicates a waitlist process.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I checked the remarks for short-term rental approval, legal STR language, NUC/TVU references, or minimum-stay restrictions. None were mentioned, so STR allowance is not evidenced from these listings.
I looked for hotel pool references such as hotel rental program, managed by hotel, or branded pool participation. There were no such mentions, and there is no evidence that STR is allowed, so this remains false.
I searched for language indicating mandatory participation in a rental pool or that owners must place units in a program. The remarks contain none of that, so mandatory pool participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any leasehold language such as lease expiry years, ground lease end dates, or renewal terms. The remarks do not mention land tenure or a specific expiration year, so the expiry remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for any reference to VA loan approval or VA financing acceptance and found none. With no prior value and no explicit mention, this is treated as not evidenced in the listings.
I looked for language indicating the HOA provides full or walls-in insurance coverage, but there were no such references in the remarks. Because there is no explicit evidence, this feature is treated as false with low-to-medium confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for any indication that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation or related inspection language, but found nothing. With no explicit mention in the public remarks, this remains unconfirmed and is treated as false with low-to-medium confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.