1718 Anapuni
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
1718 Anapuni
Building Overview
1718 Anapuni in Makiki-Tantalus — built 1974; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed (based on MLS data).
About 1718 Anapuni
Based on MLS data, 1718 Anapuni is a residential building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. The building’s year built is listed as 1974. Information on building size (number of units, stories) and construction type is not provided in the available MLS records.
According to available records, the property has specific use policies: pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. No additional amenities or interior features are documented in the MLS data provided.
The MLS data does not list the management company, parking arrangements, maintenance fees, or other homeowner association details. Buyers should verify all building specifics, policies, fees, and any other material information with the listing agent, management, or public records; this summary is based solely on the MLS information available.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for an explicit owner-occupancy percentage or strong proxy language, but the remarks did not provide one. The phrase 'Perfect opportunity for both owner-occupants and investors alike' suggests mixed buyer appeal, not a measurable occupancy rate.
I searched the remarks for an explicit elevator count (e.g., '4 elevators,' 'multiple elevators') and found none. The only mention is a reference to proximity to the elevator/stairs, which confirms an elevator exists somewhere in the building but does not state how many.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common area electricity appears to be included in the building’s maintenance fees based on MLS checkbox data: 5 of 6 listings show OTCOEX. The public remarks do not discuss this directly, so the evidence is moderate and looks like a recurring MLS entry rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water does not appear to be included in the maintenance fees. Across the current listing set, 0 of 7 show HOTWAT and several include WTRHTR, which points away from building-supplied hot water. The remarks also contain no explicit mention of hot water inclusion, so the negative signal is consistent and strong.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is included in the maintenance fees with very high confidence. All 7 of 7 current listings include SEWER, making this a consistent building-level feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly. No remarks contradict it.
Water is included in the maintenance fees with very high confidence. Every current listing reviewed includes WATER, so this appears to be a stable building-level amenity. The remarks do not introduce any conflict.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings describe outdoor/relaxation space, including an "enclosed lanai," "private lanai," "spacious lanai," and a "rooftop sitting area." That consistency across several remarks suggests the building offers patio/deck-type amenities and that the MLS checkbox is likely accurate. The feature appears in multiple agent descriptions, not just copy-paste checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence that the building has shared laundry facilities. All 7/7 current MLS listings include COMLAU, and the remarks mention it several times with phrases like 'community laundry facilities,' 'community laundry,' and 'community laundry conveniently located on the same floor.' The consistency across multiple listings suggests this is a real building amenity rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Assigned parking is clearly supported by the public remarks: 5+ listing remarks mention 'assigned parking' or 'assigned parking stall,' including one that specifies a 'WIDE assigned parking stall' located next to the elevator/stairs. The repeated language across multiple listings strongly indicates this is a real building feature, not just copy-paste noise.
Covered parking is strongly supported across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly describe a 'covered, assigned parking stall' and place it on the ground/bottom parking level, which confirms this is a building feature rather than a copy-paste checkbox only. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and listing descriptions.
I searched for deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in deed. The listings consistently describe the stall as assigned, which indicates it is not documented as deeded parking.
No analysis available
I looked for any explicit monthly parking fee or rental cost. The remarks only state that parking is assigned, so no fee can be confirmed from the text.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like parking waitlist, waiting list, or joining a list for parking. Nothing in the public remarks suggests a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the current MLS pattern: 6 of 7 listings show CONCRE in construction_materials. None of the public remarks mention a different construction type or any renovation/rebuild that would suggest a change, so this appears to be a consistent building-level attribute rather than copy-paste error.
Double-wall construction appears only inconsistently in MLS data, with 3 of 6 listings checking it and no supporting remarks. That pattern suggests possible copy-paste noise rather than a verified building-level construction type.
Hollow tile is not supported by the remarks, and the MLS signal is weak at 2 of 6 listings. With no explicit mention of hollow tile construction across the remarks, this is likely an unverified or copied checkbox rather than a dependable building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete slab foundation has moderate MLS support, with 3 of 6 listings marked SLAB. The remarks do not confirm or deny it, so this is a weaker inference than concrete construction but still plausible enough to include tentatively.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for direct STR indicators such as "short-term rental allowed," "legal vacation rental," NUC, or TVU and found none. The remarks mention investors and rentals generally, but that is not enough to confirm short-term rental permission.
I searched for hotel pool language like hotel rental pool, Hilton pool, or managed by hotel and found none. Because there is no evidence that STR is allowed, this must remain false.
I looked for wording such as mandatory pool participation, must rent, or cannot opt out and found nothing. With no STR allowance evidenced, there is also no basis for a mandatory pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold, ground lease, and lease-expiry wording such as an expiration year (for example, 2050 or 2065). There is no land-tenure information in these remarks, so the expiry year cannot be determined.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA-loan language such as "VA approved" or "VA financing" and found none. The listings mention owner-occupants and investors, but that does not indicate VA eligibility.
The public remarks directly confirm full building insurance coverage, which matches the definition of fully insured / walls-in coverage. This is a strong explicit statement, so confidence is very high.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit fire/life safety language such as 'FLSE passed,' 'fire life safety evaluation passed,' and similar certification wording, but found nothing. With no current verified value provided and no remarks confirming compliance, this remains unconfirmed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are strongly supported across the current listing remarks: at least 5 of 7 remarks explicitly mention 'mountain views' or 'mountain & city views,' and one notes 'breathtaking beauty of mountain and city views.' This is consistent with the MLS data showing MOUNTA in 5/7 view descriptions, so this appears to be a real building-level feature rather than a copy-paste artifact.
No analysis available
City views are confirmed by several current remarks, with at least 3 listings explicitly stating 'city views' or 'mountain and city views.' The MLS data matches this pattern with CITY appearing in 3/7 view descriptions, indicating the building offers city-view units even though not all units have them.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No recent listing remarks mention sunset views, and none of the 6 MLS records include SUNSET in the view description. Two records explicitly list NONE, which supports correcting this feature to false rather than inferring it from generic view language.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.