1634 Nuuanu
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
1634 Nuuanu
Building Overview
1634 Nuuanu in Liliha-Alewa: concrete building (1978) with 2 elevators; pets allowed and short-term rentals prohibited.
About 1634 Nuuanu
1634 Nuuanu is located in the Liliha-Alewa neighborhood and was built in 1978. The building is constructed of concrete and is served by two elevators. MLS records provided do not include building unit count or individual unit sizes, so those details should be confirmed with the listing agent or management.
Key features recorded in the MLS include concrete construction and two elevators. The property permit pets according to the available data. No specific on-site amenities (such as a pool, fitness center, or common areas) are listed in the provided MLS information.
According to available records, short-term rentals are not allowed at this property and the management company is listed as unknown in the MLS. Information about parking, maintenance fees, assessments, or other condo policies was not provided in the MLS extract. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all details, including management, parking, fees, and specific unit information, with the listing agent or condominium documents.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy percentages and descriptive phrases like "owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied," but found none. Since there is no evidence in the remarks, the value remains unknown.
Multiple remarks confirm the building has elevators, and one listing explicitly specifies there are 2. There is no evidence of a different count in the remarks, so the current value is retained with very high confidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
4 of 8 current listings check OTCOEX in association_fee_includes, suggesting common-area electricity may be covered. No remarks explicitly describe common electric or building power, so this appears to be moderate MLS checkbox evidence only.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current listings include HOTWAT, and 6 of 8 show WTRHTR, which is a strong sign that units have their own water heaters rather than building-provided hot water. The remarks repeatedly mention in-unit or replaced water heaters, so this is a high-confidence correction to false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
7 of 8 current listings check SEWER in association_fee_includes, which is very strong cross-listing support. Remarks also reference a replaced sewer/water pipe assessment through 2038, consistent with sewer being a building-level included expense.
No analysis available
BBQ is strongly supported across the listings. At least 5+ remarks explicitly reference a BBQ area, BBQ patio, or BBQ facilities, suggesting this is a shared building amenity rather than a copy-paste anomaly. Current MLS data also shows BBQ in all 8/8 listings, reinforcing high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Car wash facilities are directly mentioned in one listing as a 'dedicated car-wash area.' This is fewer mentions than BBQ or trash chute, but the wording is explicit and indicates a real shared amenity rather than a checkbox-only entry. Current MLS data shows 3/8 listings with CRWSH, which is consistent with partial but genuine coverage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage/locker availability is supported by the current listing set: 5 of 8 listings show storage in amenities and 4 of 8 show it in unit features. One remark explicitly says the building has 'Storage' among its amenities, and the repeated amenity pattern across listings suggests this is a genuine feature buyers can expect in the building.
I looked specifically for "surfboard storage," "board storage," and "surf storage." The remarks mention general storage in one listing, but nothing that identifies surfboard-specific storage facilities.
No analysis available
Trash chute is supported by direct mention in the remarks and is also present in 7/8 current MLS listings. The wording appears in the amenity list alongside other shared building features, making this a strong building-level amenity. Evidence suggests this is not just agent copy-paste, but a consistently reported feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building clearly has a pool. The feature appears in the current MLS amenities for 8/8 listings and is repeatedly confirmed in remarks by multiple agents, including phrases like 'swimming pool,' 'community pool,' and 'private pool with a BBQ area.' This is strong, consistent evidence and does not look like a copy-paste mistake.
No analysis available
I searched for "salt water pool," "saltwater," and related phrases. The amenities are described only as a pool or community pool, so there is no evidence that it is a salt pool.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the listings: 6+ of the provided remarks explicitly mention a washer/dryer in the unit, including phrases like 'stack washer and dryer' and 'in-unit washer and dryer.' This aligns with the current MLS inclusions data (7/8 listings), so this appears to be a real building feature rather than copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I looked for terms such as "coin laundry," "coin-op," "card operated," and "quarters," but there were no matches. The public remarks consistently point to private in-unit laundry rather than a paid shared facility.
I searched for phrases like "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," and similar shared-laundry wording, but found none. The listings repeatedly reference in-unit laundry instead, which does not support community laundry on every floor.
No analysis available
Assigned parking is clearly supported across the listings. At least 3+ remarks explicitly mention an assigned stall, reserved stall, or otherwise allocated parking space, and the MLS checkbox pattern shows ASSIGN in 7/8 listings. This looks like a consistent building feature, not a one-off agent copy/paste.
Covered parking is strongly confirmed. At least 4 listings explicitly reference covered parking, garage parking, or a covered stall, and the current MLS data shows covered/garage-related parking in all 8/8 listings. The evidence is consistent and appears to reflect the actual building amenity.
The listings consistently mention assigned or secure covered parking, which indicates parking is available with the unit. However, I did not find language like deeded, owned, or parking included in the deed, so deeded parking is not supported by the remarks.
No analysis available
I searched for monthly parking charges, rental fees, or any extra cost tied to parking. The remarks only describe the parking stall(s) and guest parking, with no fee information provided.
Guest parking is well supported by the remarks. Multiple listings mention guest parking or visitor stalls, including specific counts like "5 guest stalls" and "five guest stalls available." The feature appears consistently across agents and is reinforced by the MLS data.
Secured entry for parking/building access is strongly evidenced. Remarks cite "secured, gated building," "key-fob access," and keys for the parking garage, indicating controlled access rather than open parking. The consistency across multiple listings makes this a high-confidence building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for parking waitlist or waiting-list language and found none. The remarks instead emphasize assigned parking and guest parking, which does not suggest a documented waitlist system.
No analysis available
The remarks directly state that the building has new security gates with key-fob access, which is strong evidence of a card/fob-based security system. This is consistent across multiple listings describing the building as secured and gated.
No analysis available
I searched for wording like "security patrol," "roving security," and "patrolled building," but found nothing. The listings emphasize gates, secured access, and management, not patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Double-wall construction appears in a majority of the current MLS records (5/8), but none of the remarks explicitly describe the walls or construction type. The evidence is moderate and may reflect agent-entered MLS data rather than repeated public confirmation.
No listing remarks explicitly describe the building as hollow tile, and the current MLS signal is very sparse (1/8 listings). This looks more like an unverified checkbox than a confirmed building feature, so it is not supported by the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR-related terms such as short-term rental allowed, legal vacation rental, NUC, TVU, or hotel-style rental language. Nothing in the public remarks indicates STR is allowed, so this is treated as not evidenced and set false by default.
I looked for hotel pool, rental program, condotel, or hotel-managed language and found none. Since the remarks do not support short-term rentals, there is also no basis for a hotel rental pool.
I searched for any wording that participation in a rental pool is required, mandatory, or non-optional. The remarks contain no hotel pool references at all, so a mandatory pool is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold language such as lease expiry years, ground lease end dates, renewals, or extension terms. None of the public remarks mention land tenure or a lease expiration year, so this remains unknown.
I searched the remarks for VA approval, VA financing, or VA loans accepted and found nothing. The listings describe amenities, parking, and unit condition, but never mention VA eligibility.
The remarks include a direct reference to "full hurricane insurance," which suggests the HOA carries robust master coverage consistent with full insurance. While not phrased exactly as "walls-in coverage," it is enough to support a true value with moderate-high confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for phrases indicating a passed fire/life safety evaluation or similar certification, but found none. Because there is no explicit mention either way, this remains unconfirmed and is set to false with low confidence based on absence of evidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, sunset views are not mentioned in any remarks and are absent from the MLS view fields. Several listings explicitly show NONE in view descriptions, which supports correcting this to false rather than relying on copy-pasted agent descriptions.
No analysis available
I searched for "fireworks," "Friday night," and phrases about seeing fireworks from a lanai or unit. There is no evidence that this building offers fireworks views.
No analysis available
Multiple listings describe the building as having a resident manager, including phrases like "on-site resident manager" and "Resident Manager." The MLS amenities also show RESMAN in all 8/8 listings, which strongly supports this as a stable building feature. Evidence is consistent across different remarks and does not look like a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.