1616 Liholiho
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
1616 Liholiho
Building Overview
1616 Liholiho in Makiki-Tantalus — concrete building (1974) with mountain views and on-site resident manager.
About 1616 Liholiho
1616 Liholiho is a residential building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1974 and is of concrete construction.
Based on MLS data, the building has two elevators, mountain views, and a resident manager on site. The property does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted.
Parking is provided as covered and assigned. Management company information is listed as Unknown in the MLS. This description is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, fees and policies with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy indicators such as a percentage, "majority owner occupied," or similar language, but nothing was stated in the public remarks. Because this is a numeric field and no value is given in the remarks, it remains unknown.
The remarks repeatedly and directly confirm that the building has 2 elevators. This matches the current building context, so there is strong support for keeping the value at 2.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the supplied remarks, there are 0 explicit mentions of common area electricity or common electric being included. Although 5/8 current MLS records show OTCOEX, the public remarks do not confirm it, so this feature is not well supported and may reflect copy-paste MLS data.
No analysis available
None of the 8 current public remarks mention electricity included in the maintenance fee, and 0/8 current MLS listings check ELECTR. However, the feature was previously assessed with high confidence, so it is retained pending stronger evidence of a legitimate change.
No analysis available
No public remarks say 'hot water included.' The stronger signal is that 5/8 listings list WTRHTR, which points away from building-provided hot water. This aligns with the prior high-confidence assessment that hot water is not included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All current MLS listings show SEWER included, and none of the public remarks suggest separate sewer billing. This is consistent across multiple listings and appears to be a stable building-level inclusion.
All current MLS listings list WATER in association_fee_includes, and the public remarks do not contradict that. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and appears reliable.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the six listing public remarks mention a patio, deck, lanai, or covered patio. MLS checkbox appears in only 1 of 6 listings (CURRENT MLS data) with no prior confidence history; given the lack of any descriptive remarks across multiple agents, evidence implies the building does not offer a patio/deck amenity (likely a checkbox error). If user/owner verification or explicit remarks about a newly added patio/deck are provided, this should be re-evaluated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Trash chute appears in the MLS amenities for most recent listings (6/8), but none of the public remarks explicitly mention a "trash chute," "garbage chute," or "refuse chute." Because the evidence is coming from MLS checkbox data rather than narrative remarks, this looks moderately supported but not fully verified.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Community laundry is strongly verified for this building. Six of the eight provided remarks explicitly describe shared laundry facilities, with wording such as 'community laundry on the first floor,' 'community laundry room,' and 'common laundry facility in the Basement.' The historical MLS data also shows 7/8 listings marked COMLAU, so this appears to be a stable building amenity.
No analysis available
One listing states there is a "common laundry facility in the Basement," and multiple listings describe a single "community laundry room," indicating laundry is not on every floor.
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence supports assigned parking. Multiple listings explicitly mention 'assigned parking space/stall' or 'TWO ASSIGNED PARKING STALLS,' suggesting this is a consistent feature rather than an MLS copy/paste error. The current remarks align with the historical high-confidence signal.
There is strong, repeated evidence that the building offers covered parking. Several listings explicitly say 'covered parking' or 'covered parking stall,' including one that notes a stall next to the building entrance. This appears consistent across multiple remarks and agents, reinforcing the building-level feature.
I looked for explicit deeded-parking language such as owned stall, deeded stall, or parking included in the deed, but did not find it. The listings only describe assigned or covered stalls, so deeded parking is not confirmed.
No analysis available
I searched for any parking cost language, including a monthly fee, rental fee, or add-on parking charge, and found nothing. The remarks describe parking stalls but do not indicate that a separate parking fee applies.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist, waiting list, or instructions to join a parking queue, but found none. The listings instead describe assigned or included stalls, so there is no evidence of a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Five of six current MLS listings include the ACWIUN inclusion, and the public remarks across listings explicitly state 'A/C in living room' and '2 window ACs'. This consistent, repeated language across multiple agent remarks plus the MLS checkbox indicates strong evidence that some units in the building have window air conditioning units.
Concrete construction appears highly reliable for this building: 8 out of 8 current listings identify CONCRE in the construction materials. The remarks across multiple agents consistently describe the same secured 14-floor condo building, which aligns with a concrete high-rise and does not look like a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The slab foundation feature is not supported by the remarks: none of the listings mention a concrete slab or similar foundation detail, and the MLS evidence is limited to a single checkbox out of eight. Because this appears to be isolated MLS data rather than corroborated building-level evidence, confidence is low and the feature should not be treated as established.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit short-term rental indicators such as STR allowed, TVU, NUC, vacation rental, or hotel-rental language, but found none. With no evidence in the remarks, short-term rentals are not confirmed as allowed.
I looked for hotel pool or hotel-managed rental program references, including branded pool terms, but found nothing. Since STR is not evidenced as allowed, there is also no basis for a hotel pool claim.
I searched for wording such as mandatory participation, cannot opt out, or required rental pool membership, but found none. With no STR allowance evidenced and no rental-program language present, mandatory pool participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as a ground lease end date, lease expiration year, or renewal/extension terms, but found none. The remarks identify the property as fee-simple, which suggests no lease expiry applies.
The remarks explicitly state that the building is VA approved, which directly supports VA financing availability. This is strong, direct evidence from the public remarks.
I searched the remarks for insurance-related wording like "fully insured," "full insurance," "walls-in coverage," or similar phrases and found none. Without explicit evidence, this feature is treated as not confirmed in the remarks.
No analysis available
I looked for direct FLSE/pass language such as "fire life safety evaluation passed," "fire safety certified," or "passed fire inspection," but did not find any. The phrase about being "up-to-code for fire alarm system" suggests compliance in that area, but it is not the same as an explicit FLSE pass.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings confirm mountain views, including direct phrases like 'mountain and city views' and 'stunning mountain and city views.' This aligns with the prior high-confidence building-level evidence and appears consistently repeated across different remarks, not just copy-paste MLS checkbox data.
No analysis available
City views are well supported at the building level: current MLS data shows CITY in 8/8 listings, and multiple remarks explicitly say 'mountain and city views.' The evidence is consistent across listings and agents, making this a very strong feature for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building clearly has a resident manager on site. Multiple listings explicitly mention 'onsite resident manager' or 'on-site resident manager,' and the current MLS history shows 8/8 listings with RESMAN in amenities. The evidence is strong and consistent across several remarks, suggesting this is a real building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.