1616 Liholiho
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
1616 Liholiho
Building Overview
1616 Liholiho in Makiki-Tantalus — concrete building (1974) with mountain views and on-site resident manager.
About 1616 Liholiho
1616 Liholiho is a residential building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1974 and is of concrete construction.
Based on MLS data, the building has two elevators, mountain views, and a resident manager on site. The property does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted.
Parking is provided as covered and assigned. Management company information is listed as Unknown in the MLS. This description is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, fees and policies with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy references such as percentages, "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied." No evidence was found, so the owner-occupancy rate remains unknown from these remarks.
The public remarks repeatedly and explicitly state that the building has 2 elevators. This matches the current building context, so the value is confirmed with very high confidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the supplied public remarks, 0 listings explicitly mention common area electricity or common electric being included. Because the current MLS checkbox appears only in a minority of listings and the remarks are silent, there is not enough evidence to carry this feature forward with confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Public remarks contain no 'hot water included' language; 4 of 6 listings list WTRHTR (individual water heaters) while only 1 of 6 lists HOTWAT in association_fee_includes. Combined with prior high-confidence data, strong evidence indicates hot water is not included in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 7 current MLS listings show SEWER included, and none of the public remarks suggest separate sewer billing or a change in policy. This is strong building-level evidence, reinforced by consistent MLS checkbox data rather than a one-off agent entry.
All 7 current MLS listings list WATER in association_fee_includes, and none of the remarks contradict that. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, making this a high-confidence building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the six listing public remarks mention a patio, deck, lanai, or covered patio. MLS checkbox appears in only 1 of 6 listings (CURRENT MLS data) with no prior confidence history; given the lack of any descriptive remarks across multiple agents, evidence implies the building does not offer a patio/deck amenity (likely a checkbox error). If user/owner verification or explicit remarks about a newly added patio/deck are provided, this should be re-evaluated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Trash chute appears in the MLS amenities for 5 of 7 listings, with prior data already at medium confidence (4 of 6). None of the public remarks explicitly mention a trash/garbage chute, so the evidence is driven by repeated MLS checkbox data rather than agent descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Community laundry is strongly verified across the provided listings. All 6 current remark blocks explicitly mention shared laundry in various forms, suggesting consistent building-level amenity data rather than a one-off agent error. The repeated mentions across multiple listings and agents make this feature highly reliable.
No analysis available
One listing states there is a "common laundry facility in the Basement," and multiple listings describe a single "community laundry room," indicating laundry is not on every floor.
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence across multiple listings and agents that this building offers assigned parking. At least four remarks explicitly mention assigned or reserved stalls, including "1 assigned covered parking stall" and "TWO ASSIGNED PARKING STALLS," so this does not look like a copy-paste checkbox issue.
There is strong building-level evidence that covered parking is available. Multiple remarks from different listings mention covered parking directly, and one also ties it to assignment, making this a clear shared feature rather than a one-off unit detail.
I found repeated references to assigned, covered parking stalls, but nothing explicitly calling the parking deeded. Because the listings do not state ownership of the stall, this remains unconfirmed and is treated as false.
No analysis available
I searched for parking cost language such as a monthly fee, rental charge, or dollar amount and found nothing. The listings only say the unit has assigned/covered parking stalls, so any parking fee remains unknown.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for terms like parking waitlist, waiting list, or join-the-waitlist language and found none. The remarks describe assigned parking stalls, but do not indicate a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Five of six current MLS listings include the ACWIUN inclusion, and the public remarks across listings explicitly state 'A/C in living room' and '2 window ACs'. This consistent, repeated language across multiple agent remarks plus the MLS checkbox indicates strong evidence that some units in the building have window air conditioning units.
All 7 current listings identify the building with CONCRE construction materials, which is strong building-level evidence. None of the remarks explicitly challenge that, and the repeated MLS material entry suggests consistent data rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit STR indicators such as short-term rental allowed, STR permitted, TVU, NUC, or vacation rental language and found nothing. With no evidence of STR permission in the public remarks, this is treated as not allowed.
I looked for hotel rental pool, hotel-managed, or branded rental program language and found none. Since there is no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed, a hotel pool cannot be supported here.
I searched for mandatory rental pool language such as required participation, cannot opt out, or owner use restrictions and found nothing. With no indication of a hotel pool or STR program, mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold language such as "lease expires," "ground lease," or a specific end year, but found none. The listings instead identify the property as fee-simple, so there is no lease-expiry year to extract.
The remarks directly confirm VA approval, which means VA financing is accepted for this building. This is strong, explicit evidence from the public listings.
I searched for insurance-related phrases indicating full building or walls-in coverage. There were no such mentions in the remarks, so this cannot be confirmed from the available text.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit FLSE/fire life safety pass language such as "passed fire inspection," "fire life safety evaluation passed," or similar wording. I found only a general fire-alarm code compliance statement, which is not enough to confirm this feature.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple remarks mention “mountain and city views,” and 3 of 5 current MLS entries include MOUNTA in view_descriptions with no listings showing NONE.
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence for city views: 7/7 current MLS listings include CITY in the view field. Multiple remarks across different listings explicitly advertise "mountain and city views" or "stunning mountain and city views," indicating this is not a one-off agent entry and appears consistently supported across listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building consistently appears to have a resident manager on-site. Multiple remarks explicitly say 'onsite resident manager' or 'on-site resident manager,' and the current MLS data shows 7/7 listings with RESMAN in amenities. This is strong, repeated evidence across several listings rather than a one-off copy-paste mention.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.