1616 Liholiho
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
1616 Liholiho
Building Overview
1616 Liholiho in Makiki-Tantalus — concrete building (1974) with mountain views and on-site resident manager.
About 1616 Liholiho
1616 Liholiho is a residential building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1974 and is of concrete construction.
Based on MLS data, the building has two elevators, mountain views, and a resident manager on site. The property does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted.
Parking is provided as covered and assigned. Management company information is listed as Unknown in the MLS. This description is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, fees and policies with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The state registration reports 14 floors, and all nine listings agree between their floor fields and unit-number-derived floors, with 14 as the highest value. The county maximum of 15 likely includes a nonresidential level.
The county's reconciled residential count and residential CPR both report 51 units, matching the state's residential_units value. The state total_units and county dwell_sum of 52 were set aside because they include an additional non-residential or unreconciled count.
Owner occupancy from AOUO registration(s) 399. Refreshed by Real_Estate_Scraper/reb_registry/propagate_owner_occupancy.py, which this lock does not block.
The remarks repeatedly and directly confirm that the building has two elevators. This matches the current building context and provides strong evidence for the value.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Six of nine current listings identify OTCOEX, indicating common area electricity is included in the maintenance fee. No listings explicitly mention common area electricity in their remarks, so support is consistent but largely checkbox-based rather than independently described.
No analysis available
None of the 8 current public remarks mention electricity included in the maintenance fee, and 0/8 current MLS listings check ELECTR. However, the feature was previously assessed with high confidence, so it is retained pending stronger evidence of a legitimate change.
No analysis available
No public remarks say 'hot water included.' The stronger signal is that 5/8 listings list WTRHTR, which points away from building-provided hot water. This aligns with the prior high-confidence assessment that hot water is not included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All nine listings state that sewer is included in the association fee. There are no remarks indicating separate sewer charges, making the evidence strong and consistent across the listings.
All nine listings state that water is included in the association fee. No public remarks mention separate water fees or contradict the MLS data, so the evidence is strong across multiple listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks mention a car wash or related facility. Only 2/9 listings contain the CRWSH amenity, suggesting weak and potentially copied MLS checkbox evidence rather than a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 9 listing remarks mention a patio, deck, lanai, or covered patio. The 3/9 MLS checkbox entries are inconsistent and unsupported by remarks, so the patio/deck feature is omitted as likely unverified MLS copy-paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Seven of nine listings identify a trash chute in the MLS amenities, but 0/9 public remarks explicitly mention one. The majority checkbox evidence supports including the feature, though the lack of descriptive confirmation suggests possible MLS copy-paste and warrants only moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Community laundry is strongly verified across the listings: at least 8 of 9 current MLS records include COMLAU, and 8 remarks explicitly describe shared facilities. Key phrases include 'community laundry room,' 'community laundry on the first floor,' and 'common laundry facility in the Basement,' indicating consistent building-wide evidence rather than a single copied claim.
No analysis available
One listing states there is a "common laundry facility in the Basement," and multiple listings describe a single "community laundry room," indicating laundry is not on every floor.
Parking is strongly confirmed across all 9 listings. Key phrases include “TWO parking stalls,” “2 PREMIER parking stalls,” “one assigned parking space,” and “TWO ASSIGNED PARKING STALLS,” indicating consistent evidence from multiple listings rather than a single copied remark.
Strong building-level evidence supports assigned parking. Multiple listings explicitly mention 'assigned parking space/stall' or 'TWO ASSIGNED PARKING STALLS,' suggesting this is a consistent feature rather than an MLS copy/paste error. The current remarks align with the historical high-confidence signal.
Covered parking remains strongly confirmed. Multiple listings explicitly describe “1 assigned covered parking stall,” “1 covered parking,” and “one covered parking spot next to the building entrance,” while current MLS data identifies covered or garage parking in 7 of 9 listings.
Multiple listings confirm one or two assigned parking stalls. However, there is no explicit language that the stalls are deeded, owned, or included in the unit deed, so deeded status is not established.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for parking fees, monthly charges, rental costs, and add-on parking expenses. None were found.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks describe assigned and covered parking but contain no reference to a waitlist or process for obtaining parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Five of six current MLS listings include the ACWIUN inclusion, and the public remarks across listings explicitly state 'A/C in living room' and '2 window ACs'. This consistent, repeated language across multiple agent remarks plus the MLS checkbox indicates strong evidence that some units in the building have window air conditioning units.
All 9 current listings identify CONCRE in the construction materials. Although the public remarks do not explicitly say “concrete construction,” the complete agreement across listings and prior high confidence make this feature highly reliable.
The double-wall feature appears in only 2 of 9 MLS records, with no supporting remarks or explanatory details from any listing. Because this is a new feature with no prior confidence and limited checkbox support, it should be omitted pending explicit confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The slab foundation feature is not supported by the remarks: none of the listings mention a concrete slab or similar foundation detail, and the MLS evidence is limited to a single checkbox out of eight. Because this appears to be isolated MLS data rather than corroborated building-level evidence, confidence is low and the feature should not be treated as established.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit short-term-rental indicators and restrictions, including STR, TVU, NUC, vacation rental, and minimum-stay language. No evidence that short-term rentals are allowed was found.
I searched for hotel pool and hotel rental program references, including managed-by-hotel and branded pool language. None were found, and this feature cannot be true without evidence that STR is allowed.
I searched for statements requiring participation in a hotel rental program or prohibiting owners from opting out. No such language was found, and the prerequisite STR allowance is not evidenced.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold, ground lease, lease expiration, and renewal language. No specific lease-expiry year was found, and the fee-simple description indicates that a leasehold expiry likely does not apply.
The remarks explicitly state that the building is VA approved. This is direct, high-confidence evidence that VA financing is available.
The public remarks contain no explicit insurance information. Because there is no current true value and no qualifying insurance language, the feature remains false with limited confidence.
No analysis available
The remarks mention that the building is 'up-to-code for fire alarm system,' but this does not explicitly confirm that a fire/life safety evaluation was passed. Searches for FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, and passed fire inspection language found no qualifying statement.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
One of nine listings reports OCEAN in the MLS view data. No public remark explicitly confirms an ocean, water, Pacific Ocean, or makai view, so this appears to be a limited MLS indication rather than strong multi-agent evidence.
Mountain views are supported by 6 of 9 MLS listings and repeated explicit remarks from multiple listings. Key phrases include "mountain and city views" and "stunning mountain and city views," providing strong building-level evidence.
No analysis available
City views are consistently reported across all 9 listings, with CITY present in every MLS view description. Multiple remarks independently state "mountain and city views," making this strong, repeated evidence rather than a single isolated checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of nine listings reports SUNRIS in the MLS view data. No public remark directly confirms a sunrise view; although one remark notes that bedrooms face east, the evidence is not strong enough to establish this as a consistent building feature.
One of nine listings reports SUNSET in the MLS view data, but none of the public remarks explicitly confirms a sunset or western-facing view. This is a weak, isolated MLS indication with no supporting multi-listing detail.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building clearly has a resident manager on site. Multiple listings explicitly mention 'onsite resident manager' or 'on-site resident manager,' and the current MLS history shows 8/8 listings with RESMAN in amenities. The evidence is strong and consistent across several remarks, suggesting this is a real building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.