1541 Davenport Place
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
1541 Davenport Place
Building Overview
1541 Davenport Place in Makiki-Tantalus (built 1982). Pets and short-term rentals not allowed; management company unknown.
About 1541 Davenport Place
Based on MLS data, 1541 Davenport Place is located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood and was built in 1982. The MLS-provided records do not specify total building size, unit count, or construction type, so those details should be verified with the listing agent or management.
According to available records, key property policies include no pets and no short-term rentals. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. No specific amenities, common area features, or unit-level details are provided in the source data.
Buyers should note that this summary is based solely on MLS data available for the property; prospective purchasers are advised to confirm parking, maintenance fees, building size, construction details, amenity access, and management arrangements with the listing agent or through direct documentation before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for any explicit owner-occupancy language, including percentages or qualitative descriptions, and found none. The remarks describe the property as suitable for buyers or investors, but that does not establish the owner-occupancy rate.
I searched the remarks for elevator references and found none. The building is described as a small 12-unit complex, but there is no explicit evidence about elevator count, so the value remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
2 of 3 current listings include OTCOEX, suggesting common-area electricity may be covered, but none of the remarks explicitly confirm it. The evidence looks more like MLS checkbox data than agent-described amenity detail, so confidence is only moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 3 current listings show sewer included in association fees, which is strong MLS-level evidence. The public remarks do not mention sewer directly, so this appears to come from the checkbox data rather than repeated agent description.
All 3 current listings include water in association fees, giving strong current MLS support for this feature. No public remarks explicitly call it out, so the evidence is based on consistent listing data rather than descriptive text.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
3 of 3 current listings include COMLAU, indicating the building has shared/community laundry facilities. No remarks explicitly mention laundry, so this appears to be MLS amenity data rather than repeated agent description, but it is consistently present across the available listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 of 3 public remarks explicitly mention assigned or reserved parking. They only say "covered parking stall" / "1-covered parking stall," which supports covered parking but not assignment. This looks like possible copy-paste MLS checkbox data rather than independently verified assigned parking.
3 of 3 listings mention covered parking, using phrases like "covered parking stall" and "1-covered parking stall." The repeated language across multiple remarks strongly confirms the building offers covered parking, regardless of the MLS checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction appears in the current MLS material field for 2 of 3 listings, which is enough to treat it as likely true for the building. None of the public remarks mention construction type directly, so this is driven by MLS data rather than agent commentary. Because there is no prior confidence history, confidence is moderate rather than high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for insurance-related language such as fully insured, full insurance, or walls-in coverage and found no references. The remarks do not provide enough information to determine whether the building is fully insured.
No analysis available
I looked for any mention of fire/life safety evaluation passed, FLSE passed, fire safety certified, or similar language and found nothing. With no explicit evidence in the remarks, this feature cannot be confirmed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the available listings, there is no evidence of sunset views: all 3 current MLS entries list view_descriptions as NONE, and the remarks do not reference sunset or western exposure. This looks consistent across listings rather than a copy-paste omission, so the building should be treated as not offering sunset views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.