1525 Pensacola
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
1525 Pensacola
Building Overview
1525 Pensacola in Makiki-Tantalus, built 1967; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About 1525 Pensacola
1525 Pensacola is a residential building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood, originally built in 1967. According to available MLS records, specific details such as unit sizes, total number of units, and construction type are not provided in the data set.
Key points reported in the MLS include building policies: pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records. No additional amenities or common-area features are specified in the MLS data provided.
Additional information commonly relevant to buyers—such as parking availability, maintenance fees, recent assessments, insurance, or HOA rules—is not included in the supplied MLS excerpt. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all building details, policies, and fees with the listing agent or management before making purchasing decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 1/3 current listings show OTCOEX in association_fee_includes and none of the provided public remarks mention 'common area electricity' or 'building power included.' Evidence appears to be isolated (possible agent checkbox) rather than confirmed across agents or remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings show HOTWAT and two of three show WTRHTR (water heater), which strongly suggests units have their own hot water heaters and hot water is not included in the maintenance fee. None of the public remarks mention 'hot water included.'
No analysis available
No analysis available
Two of three current listings list 'SEWER' in association_fee_includes. While public remarks do not explicitly state 'sewer included,' the majority of MLS entries indicate sewer is part of the HOA fees, so evidence is moderate but not definitive.
Two of three current listings list 'WATER' in association_fee_includes. No public remarks explicitly state 'water included,' but the MLS majority suggests water is commonly included in the HOA fees; evidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 3 current MLS listings include washer/dryer in the inclusions and the public remarks explicitly state 'washer/dryer' and 'washer and dryer in unit.' Multiple listings consistently mention in-unit laundry, so the evidence is strong that at least some units in the building have in-unit washer and dryer.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
2 of 3 current listings list 'ASSIGN' in parking features and this remark states '1 parking stall on the 3rd floor', which implies an assigned/reserved stall. Multiple listings indicate assignment across different agents, so evidence is strong that the building offers assigned parking.
1 of 3 current listings' parking_features suggests covered/garage parking, however none of the public remarks explicitly say 'covered', 'garage', or 'carport'. The evidence is limited and may reflect checkbox usage by some agents, so include the feature with moderate confidence.
The remarks explicitly reference a single parking stall as part of the unit ('1 parking stall' and 'includes ... parking'), which indicates the parking is provided with the unit. The text does not literally use the word 'deeded', so confidence is somewhat reduced but still reasonably high that the stall is included/owned with the unit.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like 'parking fee', 'monthly parking charge', or 'additional parking cost' and found none. Because remarks indicate parking is included, there is no stated separate parking fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for terms such as 'parking waitlist' or 'join waitlist for parking' and found none. With no evidence in the remarks, assume no waitlist is indicated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence that some units have window AC is strong: 2/3 current listings include the ACWIUN inclusion and the public remarks for this unit explicitly note a 'window air conditioner in the bedroom.' Multiple listings and an agent remark independently indicate window units rather than a single mistaken checkbox.
MLS checkbox shows 2 of 3 listings mark 'concrete' construction, but none of the public remarks reviewed mention 'concrete', 'reinforced concrete', or similar. With no user verification or explicit remark confirming recent changes, the evidence is weak and likely reflects agent checkbox usage rather than verified building construction.
No analysis available
One of three MLS listings marks 'hollow tile' construction, but public remarks reviewed do not include 'hollow tile' or related language. Without explicit remarks or owner/site verification indicating hollow tile construction, the evidence is insufficient and the feature is omitted for now.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for indications of STR permission or restrictions (NUC, TVU, '30-day minimum', etc.) and found none. Therefore STR is not indicated in the public remarks.
Because STR is not indicated and there are no remarks about hotel rental pool participation, this is set to false. I searched for phrases like 'hotel rental pool' or 'managed by hotel' and found none.
I searched for wording such as 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or conversely for 'optional' or 'can opt out'. No evidence was found, and because STR is not indicated, mandatory pool must be false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listing explicitly says 'Fee simple', indicating this is not a leasehold, so no lease expiry year applies. If this were leasehold, I'd look for a 4-digit year (e.g., 'lease expires 2050').
I searched the remarks for phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', or 'VA loans accepted' and found none. With no evidence in the remarks, VA financing is assumed not indicated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0/3) mention sunset views and one listing explicitly lists View = NONE. The provided public remarks make no reference to sunset views, western exposure, or evening sun. Given the absence of any agent remarks indicating sunset views across multiple listings, there is strong evidence the building does not offer a notable sunset view feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.