1510 Liholiho
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
1510 Liholiho
Building Overview
1510 Liholiho in Makiki-Tantalus, built 1969 with concrete construction; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About 1510 Liholiho
1510 Liholiho is a residential building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1969 and is of concrete construction.
MLS-derived data does not list specific on-site amenities or unit features for this property. Buyers should be aware that detailed information about common facilities, unit layouts, and recent renovations was not provided in the available MLS records.
Based on MLS data, pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted at this property. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS. Prospective buyers should verify policies, building management, parking, maintenance fees, and any other material details with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy percentages and descriptions such as 80% owner occupied, majority owner occupied, or highly owner occupied. No owner-occupancy information appears in the remarks, so the percentage is unknown.
I searched for elevator-related terms, including elevator, elevators, multiple elevators, and specific counts such as 4 elevators. The remarks only mention a 4th-floor unit and walking up to it, which does not explicitly confirm or deny an elevator.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence supports cable TV inclusion. Multiple remarks say the fee includes "cable TV," and the MLS data shows CABTV in 4 of 6 listings, suggesting this is a consistent building benefit rather than a one-off agent error.
The MLS checkbox evidence is strong in the current data, with OTCOEX present on all 5 listings. However, none of the public remarks specifically describe common-area electricity, so this is supported more by MLS consistency than by narrative confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence strongly indicates hot water is not included in the maintenance fee. There are no current HOTWAT hits, while WTRHTR appears on most listings, which is a strong signal that units have their own water heaters rather than a building-paid hot water system.
Internet inclusion is very well supported. At least two remarks directly state that the fee includes internet, and the MLS data shows INTSER on 5 of 6 listings, which is consistent across multiple agents.
No analysis available
Sewer is clearly included in the building’s maintenance fee. Remarks state "water, sewer, cable TV, and internet," and the MLS data confirms SEWER in 5 of 6 listings, indicating strong building-level consistency.
Water inclusion is strongly confirmed. Multiple remarks say the fee includes water, including one that says "Water is included in the maintenance fee," and the MLS data shows WATER on 5 of 6 listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across multiple remarks confirms in-unit laundry. At least 4 listings explicitly mention a washer and dryer in the unit, including 'full-size washer and dryer,' 'in-unit laundry,' and 'washer/dryer on the lanai/balcony.' One remark says washers/dryers may be installed with association approval, which suggests the MLS checkbox may vary, but the overall evidence still strongly supports that this building offers in-unit laundry.
0 of 3 recent public-remarks mention a community laundry; instead 3 listings explicitly reference in-unit laundry: quotes include "washer and dryer on the lanai" and "Skip having to go to a community laundry since you have your own washer and dryer on the lanai." Only 1/3 MLS listings have the COMLAU checkbox, suggesting agent error rather than an actual shared laundry facility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence from 3 public remarks is mixed but supports that the building offers parking: 1 remark explicitly: '1 partially covered parking stall', a second states 'No parking conveys with the unit, however parking options may be available to rent across the street', and MLS checkbox data lists parking features for 2 of 3 listings. This indicates the building does provide parking (including at least some assigned/covered stalls), though availability may vary by unit or be rentable.
Assigned parking is supported by multiple current listings: phrases like "assigned parking stall" and "includes a partially covered parking stall" appear directly in the remarks. Historical MLS data also aligns, with 4 of 5 listings showing ASSIGN, suggesting this is not a copy-paste anomaly but a consistent building feature for some units.
Covered parking is supported by multiple listings, though not all units include it. At least 2 remarks explicitly mention a "partially covered parking stall," while other listings describe assigned parking or no parking at all, which indicates parking availability varies by unit. The evidence is moderate and consistent across remarks, so the building should be treated as offering covered parking for some units.
The listings do not describe deeded or owned parking. The explicit statement that no parking conveys with the unit strongly indicates parking is not deeded, even though some listings mention an assigned or partially covered stall.
No analysis available
The remarks include a possible rented parking option but do not state a specific parking charge. The available evidence is insufficient to determine a monthly parking fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings discuss assigned stalls, guest parking, and possible nearby rental parking. None mentions a building parking waitlist.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Split AC is strongly supported for this building. At least 5 listings in the provided remarks explicitly mention split AC or split AC units, and the wording is consistent across multiple agents, which suggests this is a real building feature rather than a copy-paste error. The current MLS data also shows ACSPL included in 6/6 listings, reinforcing the high-confidence result.
No analysis available
Concrete construction appears to be a consistent building characteristic: 6 of 6 current listings list CONCRE. The public remarks do not discuss construction type, but the MLS data is fully consistent across listings, so this looks reliable rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
Hollow tile is supported by current MLS data in 4 of 6 listings. The public remarks are silent on construction, so the evidence comes mainly from the recurring MLS material field rather than agent comments.
Masonry/stucco appears in 1 of 6 current MLS listings, but the public remarks do not mention it. This is weaker than the other construction features and could reflect a partial or inconsistent MLS entry, but it is still a building feature a buyer might search for.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks do not provide evidence that short-term rentals are permitted. No explicit STR authorization or qualifying rental language was found.
The remarks contain no evidence of participation in a hotel rental pool. Because short-term rental permission is not established, this feature is also false under the prerequisite rule.
The listings do not mention any required hotel rental program or mandatory pool participation. Since STR is not established as permitted, mandatory hotel-pool participation must also be false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks describe the residence as fee simple and do not provide a lease-expiry date. No specific four-digit lease year can be extracted.
The public remarks were searched for explicit VA loan approval or financing language, but none was found. There is insufficient evidence to confirm VA eligibility.
I searched for fully insured, full insurance, comprehensive building insurance, and walls-in coverage. The remarks do not discuss the building's insurance coverage, so full HOA insurance cannot be confirmed.
No analysis available
I searched for FLSE, fire/life safety evaluation, fire safety certification, life safety compliance, and passed fire inspection language. None of these were mentioned in the public remarks, so there is no evidence confirming that the building passed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No evidence supports sunset views for this building. Across the provided listings, 0 mention sunset-related language and the remarks only describe balconies, breezes, and interior upgrades—not sunset or western exposure. The MLS view data also overwhelmingly shows NONE, which reinforces that sunset views are not a building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.