1510 Liholiho
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
1510 Liholiho
Building Overview
1510 Liholiho in Makiki-Tantalus, built 1969 with concrete construction; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About 1510 Liholiho
1510 Liholiho is a residential building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1969 and is of concrete construction.
MLS-derived data does not list specific on-site amenities or unit features for this property. Buyers should be aware that detailed information about common facilities, unit layouts, and recent renovations was not provided in the available MLS records.
Based on MLS data, pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted at this property. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS. Prospective buyers should verify policies, building management, parking, maintenance fees, and any other material details with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for owner-occupancy indicators such as "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied," and found no references. The remarks do not provide an owner-occupancy percentage or even a descriptive indicator, so it remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for elevator references such as "elevator," "elevators," "multiple elevators," or a specific count like "4 elevators," and found none. With no explicit evidence in the listings, the number of elevators cannot be confirmed from the remarks.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence supports cable TV inclusion. Multiple remarks say the fee includes "cable TV," and the MLS data shows CABTV in 4 of 6 listings, suggesting this is a consistent building benefit rather than a one-off agent error.
The MLS checkbox evidence is strong in the current data, with OTCOEX present on all 5 listings. However, none of the public remarks specifically describe common-area electricity, so this is supported more by MLS consistency than by narrative confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence strongly indicates hot water is not included in the maintenance fee. There are no current HOTWAT hits, while WTRHTR appears on most listings, which is a strong signal that units have their own water heaters rather than a building-paid hot water system.
Internet inclusion is very well supported. At least two remarks directly state that the fee includes internet, and the MLS data shows INTSER on 5 of 6 listings, which is consistent across multiple agents.
No analysis available
Sewer is clearly included in the building’s maintenance fee. Remarks state "water, sewer, cable TV, and internet," and the MLS data confirms SEWER in 5 of 6 listings, indicating strong building-level consistency.
Water inclusion is strongly confirmed. Multiple remarks say the fee includes water, including one that says "Water is included in the maintenance fee," and the MLS data shows WATER on 5 of 6 listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across multiple remarks confirms in-unit laundry. At least 4 listings explicitly mention a washer and dryer in the unit, including 'full-size washer and dryer,' 'in-unit laundry,' and 'washer/dryer on the lanai/balcony.' One remark says washers/dryers may be installed with association approval, which suggests the MLS checkbox may vary, but the overall evidence still strongly supports that this building offers in-unit laundry.
0 of 3 recent public-remarks mention a community laundry; instead 3 listings explicitly reference in-unit laundry: quotes include "washer and dryer on the lanai" and "Skip having to go to a community laundry since you have your own washer and dryer on the lanai." Only 1/3 MLS listings have the COMLAU checkbox, suggesting agent error rather than an actual shared laundry facility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence from 3 public remarks is mixed but supports that the building offers parking: 1 remark explicitly: '1 partially covered parking stall', a second states 'No parking conveys with the unit, however parking options may be available to rent across the street', and MLS checkbox data lists parking features for 2 of 3 listings. This indicates the building does provide parking (including at least some assigned/covered stalls), though availability may vary by unit or be rentable.
Assigned parking is supported by multiple current listings: phrases like "assigned parking stall" and "includes a partially covered parking stall" appear directly in the remarks. Historical MLS data also aligns, with 4 of 5 listings showing ASSIGN, suggesting this is not a copy-paste anomaly but a consistent building feature for some units.
Covered parking is supported by multiple listings, though not all units include it. At least 2 remarks explicitly mention a "partially covered parking stall," while other listings describe assigned parking or no parking at all, which indicates parking availability varies by unit. The evidence is moderate and consistent across remarks, so the building should be treated as offering covered parking for some units.
I checked for language like "deeded parking," "owned parking," or "parking included in deed" and did not find it. The remarks instead describe assigned/partially covered parking and explicitly state that no parking conveys with one unit, so deeded parking is not supported.
No analysis available
I searched for parking rent, monthly parking charges, or any added parking cost, but the remarks only mention assigned stalls, partially covered parking, or off-site parking options. No specific parking fee is provided.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I checked the remarks for 'parking waitlist,' 'waiting list,' or instructions to join a list for parking and found nothing. The listings describe assigned parking or no parking conveyance, but not a waitlist process.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Split AC is strongly supported for this building. At least 5 listings in the provided remarks explicitly mention split AC or split AC units, and the wording is consistent across multiple agents, which suggests this is a real building feature rather than a copy-paste error. The current MLS data also shows ACSPL included in 6/6 listings, reinforcing the high-confidence result.
No analysis available
Concrete construction appears to be a consistent building characteristic: 6 of 6 current listings list CONCRE. The public remarks do not discuss construction type, but the MLS data is fully consistent across listings, so this looks reliable rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
Hollow tile is supported by current MLS data in 4 of 6 listings. The public remarks are silent on construction, so the evidence comes mainly from the recurring MLS material field rather than agent comments.
Masonry/stucco appears in 1 of 6 current MLS listings, but the public remarks do not mention it. This is weaker than the other construction features and could reflect a partial or inconsistent MLS entry, but it is still a building feature a buyer might search for.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR indicators such as "short-term rental allowed," "vacation rental," "TVU," or "NUC" and found none. Nothing in the public remarks supports short-term rentals, so this is treated as not allowed based on the available text.
I looked for hotel-pool language like "hotel rental pool," "managed by hotel," or brand-specific pool references and found none. Because the remarks do not support STRs at all, a hotel rental pool is also not supported.
I searched for wording like "mandatory hotel pool," "required to participate," or "cannot opt out" and found nothing. Since there is no evidence of any STR program, mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold wording such as 'lease expires,' 'ground lease ends,' or a renewal year, but found no such language. One listing instead states the property is fee simple, so there is no land lease expiry to extract.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA loan approval language and found none. The listings discuss fee simple ownership, parking, and unit features, but nothing indicates VA financing availability.
I searched for insurance-related phrases like fully insured, full insurance, walls-in coverage, or comprehensive building insurance, but the remarks do not reference any of them. There is no public-remarks evidence to confirm the building is fully insured by the HOA.
No analysis available
I looked for fire/life safety language such as FLSE, fire life safety evaluation passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection, and found nothing. Since the remarks do not mention any fire/life safety certification or inspection result, this remains unconfirmed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No evidence supports sunset views for this building. Across the provided listings, 0 mention sunset-related language and the remarks only describe balconies, breezes, and interior upgrades—not sunset or western exposure. The MLS view data also overwhelmingly shows NONE, which reinforces that sunset views are not a building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.