1510 Liholiho
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
1510 Liholiho
Building Overview
1510 Liholiho in Makiki-Tantalus, built 1969 with concrete construction; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About 1510 Liholiho
1510 Liholiho is a residential building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1969 and is of concrete construction.
MLS-derived data does not list specific on-site amenities or unit features for this property. Buyers should be aware that detailed information about common facilities, unit layouts, and recent renovations was not provided in the available MLS records.
Based on MLS data, pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted at this property. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS. Prospective buyers should verify policies, building management, parking, maintenance fees, and any other material details with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The public remarks contain no information about owner-occupancy percentage. With no current numeric value in the dataset and no explicit mention in the remarks, the owner-occupancy is unknown (null) with low confidence.
The public remarks do not mention elevators. Because no numeric current value was provided in the dataset and there is no explicit mention in the remarks, I cannot determine the number of elevators and am returning null with low confidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
At least 2 of the 4 public remarks explicitly state cable TV is included: 'maintenance fee ... includes ... cable TV' and 'Hawaiian Telcom Internet/TV (2 years left on bulk agreement)'. Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and supported by MLS checkboxes (2/4).
MLS checkbox data shows OTCOEX on all 4 current listings, however none of the public remarks explicitly mention common area electricity. Inclusion is based on consistent MLS checkbox reporting (4/4) but lacks corroborating remarks, so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no evidence that building-supplied hot water is covered by maintenance: HOTWAT is absent from all 4 MLS listings and WTRHTR appears on 3/4 listings (units have water heaters). Public remarks do not mention 'hot water included', so hot water included=false with high confidence.
At least 2 of the 4 public remarks explicitly mention internet/bulk Hawaiian Telcom service ('internet included', 'Hawaiian Telcom Internet/TV (2 years left on bulk agreement)'). MLS checkbox data (3/4) also supports inclusion, giving strong evidence that internet is included.
No analysis available
At least 2 of the 4 public remarks state sewer is included ('includes water, sewer...' and 'water/sewer $70 (based on usage...)'), and MLS checkboxes (3/4) corroborate. Evidence strongly supports sewer being included in the maintenance fee.
At least 2 of the 4 public remarks state water is included ('maintenance fee ... includes water' and 'Water is included in the maintenance fee up to a certain amount'), and MLS checkboxes (3/4) support this. Evidence indicates water is included (sometimes with usage limits).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence from the public remarks is strong: 3 of 4 listing remarks explicitly state in-unit laundry (e.g., "balcony with a full-sized washer and dryer", "own washer and dryer on the lanai", "washer/dryer on the lanai"). The remaining remark notes that washers/dryers may be installed with association approval. Multiple agents consistently mention the feature and the MLS inclusions show 3/4 listings with washer/dryer listed, so the building should be marked as offering in-unit laundry.
0 of 3 recent public-remarks mention a community laundry; instead 3 listings explicitly reference in-unit laundry: quotes include "washer and dryer on the lanai" and "Skip having to go to a community laundry since you have your own washer and dryer on the lanai." Only 1/3 MLS listings have the COMLAU checkbox, suggesting agent error rather than an actual shared laundry facility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence from 3 public remarks is mixed but supports that the building offers parking: 1 remark explicitly: '1 partially covered parking stall', a second states 'No parking conveys with the unit, however parking options may be available to rent across the street', and MLS checkbox data lists parking features for 2 of 3 listings. This indicates the building does provide parking (including at least some assigned/covered stalls), though availability may vary by unit or be rentable.
Three of four MLS entries currently mark assigned parking and two public remarks explicitly state 'Includes one partially covered parking stall.' One remark explicitly says 'No parking conveys' for that unit, so assigned parking appears to be available for some units but not all; evidence is moderate across listings and consistent with MLS checkbox data.
No analysis available
Some unit remarks state a 'partially covered parking stall' while another listing explicitly says 'No parking conveys with the unit' and mentions rental options. None of the public remarks use 'deeded', 'owned', or 'included in deed', so there is no evidence parking is deeded.
No analysis available
Remarks reference rentable parking options across the street and guest stalls, but provide no numeric monthly parking fee or stated parking rental cost. Therefore the monthly parking fee cannot be determined from these remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for terms like 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list', or instructions about joining a list for parking; none appear in the remarks. Absence of any mention suggests there is no advertised waitlist in these listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 4 current MLS listings include ACSPL in inclusions and at least 3 of the public remarks explicitly mention split AC (quotes: "Split AC units in the living room and bedroom"; "two split AC units"). Evidence is consistent across multiple listings/agents and aligns with historical high confidence, so the building is reported to offer split (ductless/mini-split) AC in some units.
No analysis available
All 4 current MLS listings (4/4) list 'CONCRE' under construction materials, but 0 of 4 public remarks explicitly mention concrete (no phrases like 'concrete construction' or 'reinforced concrete'). The MLS checkbox consistency across listings supports inclusion, but lack of explicit agent remarks suggests implied (not directly stated) evidence and possible copy/paste.
No analysis available
2 of 4 current MLS listings list 'HOLTIL' under construction materials, but 0 of 4 public remarks mention 'hollow tile' or similar. With no prior confidence and no remarks across listings, the HOLTIL entries appear inconsistent/copy-paste and do not provide reliable evidence that the building is hollow-tile construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for short-term rental language (e.g., 'short-term rental allowed', 'vacation rental', 'TVU', 'NUC') and found no references. With no evidence in the remarks, STRs are not indicated as allowed.
I looked for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', or management by a hotel brand and found nothing. Because the remarks do not support STRs, there is no evidence of participation in a hotel rental pool.
I searched for language like 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or similar and found none. Given there is no evidence STR participation or a hotel pool exists, there is no indication of a mandatory rental pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for phrases such as 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'leasehold expiring in', and renewal language; nothing in the remarks specifies a lease expiry year. Therefore the lease expiry year is unknown from these remarks.
I searched the remarks for phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', or 'VA loans accepted' and found none. With no explicit mention in any of the listings, there is no evidence the building is VA-approved.
The remarks do not state that the HOA provides full (walls-in) insurance for the building. Because there is no explicit mention and no existing value to keep, this is marked false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
There is no statement in the public remarks indicating the building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation. In the absence of any mention and with no current value to retain, the default is false with medium confidence (absence of evidence suggests it is likely not stated).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0/4) mention 'SUNSET' and one listing explicitly lists the view as 'NONE'. The public remarks provided make no reference to sunset views, western exposure, or evening scenes, indicating agents are not advertising sunset views across multiple listings. Historical assessment already indicated high confidence that sunset views were absent, and current remarks/checkboxes continue to support that conclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.