1010 Wilder
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
1010 Wilder
Building Overview
1010 Wilder in Makiki-Tantalus — concrete building built in 1974. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed, management listed as unknown.
About 1010 Wilder
1010 Wilder is a concrete residential building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1974. Size and unit count are not provided in the MLS data available for this summary.
Key recorded features include the building's concrete construction and site in Makiki-Tantalus. Based on MLS data, pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the available MLS records.
Additional details such as parking arrangements, maintenance fees, unit amenities, and homeowner association specifics are not provided in the MLS data reviewed. Buyers should verify all building features, rules, and any fees with official association documents or the listing agent, as this summary is based solely on available MLS data.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The public remarks explicitly describe very high owner-occupancy (phrases include 'almost 100% owner occupied' and 'predominantly owner-occupied'), so the owner-occupancy is reported as 'almost 100%' with high confidence based on those direct statements.
The public remarks mention elevators multiple times and describe semi-private/dedicated elevator access and "elevators on either side," indicating more than one elevator exists. However, no explicit numeric count (e.g., "2 elevators" or "4 elevators") is provided, so the exact number is unknown and cannot be guessed.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No public remarks (0/7 listings) state 'cable included' or similar despite CABTV being checked in MLS. Multiple agents' remarks describe amenities (pool, parking, lobby, elevators, EV charging) but do not state cable is included, indicating the MLS checkbox was likely copy/pasted and not an actually promoted building feature.
Although OTCOEX is checked in the MLS, 0/7 public remarks mention 'common area electricity' or that building power is included. Agents emphasize building amenities (pool, elevators, lobby) but do not state common electric is covered by fees, suggesting the checkbox was likely applied in error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
HOTWAT is checked in MLS entries but 0/7 public remarks mention 'hot water included' or similar. Remarks focus on unit features and shared amenities (pool, parking, lobby) without referencing building-supplied hot water, so the listing text does not support the MLS flag.
No analysis available
No analysis available
SEWER appears checked in MLS, yet 0/7 public remarks mention sewer being included. Agents repeatedly highlight amenities (pool, parking, lobby, elevator) but omit sewer/water utility inclusions, indicating the MLS indication is probably incorrect.
Although WATER is checked on MLS records, 0/7 public remarks state 'water included' or similar. Listing copy emphasizes building amenities and unit features without noting water included in maintenance, suggesting the checkbox was likely copy/pasted and not an actual building feature.
CURRENT MLS: 6/7 listings list BBQ. Public remarks mention BBQ/BBQ pavilion and 'pool with lounge and BBQ pavilion' in multiple listing remarks (appears at least twice in the compiled remarks), describing a shared pool/BBQ pavilion used for entertaining. Evidence is consistent across agents and directly references a building-level BBQ facility, so include this feature with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
CURRENT MLS: 4/7 listings list car wash, yet the compiled public remarks contain no mention of car wash facilities or vehicle wash stations. Absence of any descriptive remark suggests the MLS checkbox may be inaccurate or copy-pasted without verification.
CURRENT MLS: 1/7 listings check CLUHOU, however the compiled public remarks contain no references to a clubhouse, club house, or community center. Given lack of corroboration in agent remarks, this likely reflects inconsistent checkbox usage rather than a described shared clubhouse.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings for the building explicitly advertise lanais/covered lanais: 3 of 7 MLS records show PATDEC/COVPAT and numerous remarks state 'nearly 300 square-foot ... lanai', 'enclosed lanai', and 'two covered lanais'. Evidence is consistent across several agent remarks (not a single isolated entry), indicating the building offers patio/deck (lanai) amenities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Private yard is not supported by the remarks: 1 of 7 MLS entries checked PRIYAR but none of the public remarks mention 'private yard', 'fenced yard', or 'private outdoor space'. With minimal MLS checkbox use and no agent remarks describing yard access, the evidence does not support listing a private yard for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
CURRENT MLS: 2/7 listings check RECROO, but the compiled public remarks contain no mention of a recreation room, rec room, game room, or similar. With no corroborating remarks across listings and low historical confidence, this appears to be agent checkbox noise rather than a described building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings for this building explicitly mention building/unit storage — phrases include “additional storage room,” “exterior storage right outside your door,” and “lots of interior storage.” MLS checkbox data also flags storage in 3 of 7 listings, and the remarks provide independent, explicit confirmation across several agents, so the building offers storage/lockers.
I searched the remarks for terms indicating dedicated surfboard or board storage (including combined bike/surfboard storage). The public remarks do not reference any surfboard storage amenity.
No analysis available
CURRENT MLS: 5/7 listings check TRACHU, but the compiled public remarks include no references to trash chute, garbage chute, or refuse chute. With no descriptive confirmations across agent remarks, the checkbox entries appear unsupported by the listing text.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 7 current MLS listings list the pool amenity and multiple public remark sections explicitly mention the building pool, with phrases like "Salt Water pool," "pool area evokes a private estate," and "pool with lounge and BBQ pavilion." Evidence is consistent across listings and appears in separate remark blocks rather than a single isolated line, supporting a high-confidence inclusion of a building pool.
No analysis available
The remarks clearly advertise a 'Salt Water pool', which directly indicates a salt/saltwater pool. This overrides the building context note of pool=False because the public remarks explicitly mention a salt water pool. Set to true with high confidence.
All 7 current MLS listings list WASHER/DRYER in the inclusions, and at least one public remark explicitly states a "separate laundry room with storage," indicating in-unit laundry. The consistency across all listings reduces the likelihood of a single listing error, so the building is reported as offering in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit language indicating paid community laundry (quarters, card-operated machines, coin-op). The remarks do not describe any paid community laundry; only an in-unit laundry room is referenced.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and 'floor-by-floor laundry'. The remarks only reference a 'separate laundry room with storage' within the unit and do not describe community laundry facilities on every floor.
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building offers assigned parking: at least four separate remarks explicitly reference deeded/assigned stalls (quotes include "3 deeded covered parking stalls", "Two assigned covered parking spaces", "Three covered parking spaces convey"). This aligns with MLS checkbox data showing ASSIGN in 6 of 7 listings, indicating a reliable building-level assigned parking feature.
Clear and consistent evidence that the building has covered parking: numerous remarks state "deeded covered parking stalls", "Two assigned covered parking spaces", and "two covered, side-by-side parking", and MLS shows covered parking on all listings (7/7). Multiple agents repeatedly describe covered stalls, making this a well-supported building feature.
Several lines in the public remarks explicitly indicate parking stalls convey with the unit and are described as deeded/assigned. This gives high confidence that parking is deeded/owned with the unit.
No analysis available
Searched for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking charge', or 'parking rental' and found no fee information. The remarks indicate parking stalls convey or are assigned but do not specify any separate monthly fee.
Evidence supports guest parking being available: MLS flags GUEST on 6 of 7 listings and at least one remark explicitly states "Ample guest parking." While fewer remarks mention it explicitly than for covered/assigned stalls, the combination of MLS data and agent remarks indicates guest parking is offered at the property.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 'waitlist', 'waiting list', or similar references regarding parking and found no mentions. With no evidence in the remarks, a parking waitlist is not indicated.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit references to electronic/card/fob access systems. The listing describes the property as a 'secure building' and notes secured parking and elevators, but there is no explicit statement that card/fob access is used.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for any indication of a security patrol or roving security service. The listing mentions a secure building and resident manager but does not reference a patrol service.
No analysis available
6 of 7 current MLS listings have central AC checked (ACCEN/CENAC). Public remarks in multiple listing blocks explicitly state 'central AC' and 'Central AC inside the unit' (quotes: 'central AC, separate laundry...' and 'Additional features include Central AC inside the unit'), supporting a building-level central air system; majority agent data and remarks consistently indicate central AC, though some repetition suggests possible copy/paste across listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 7 current MLS listings for the building check 'CONCRE' under construction materials, though none of the public remarks explicitly state 'concrete' or 'reinforced concrete.' The uniform MLS checkbox across multiple listings suggests the building is concrete, but absence of remarks means this is implied (possible agent copy/paste). Confidence is set to 0.80 reflecting consistent MLS data but lack of explicit corroborating language in agent remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched the remarks for terms indicating short-term rental allowance or prohibition and found none. Because there is no evidence in the public remarks, STR allowance cannot be confirmed and is set to false.
Looked for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', or references to being managed by a hotel and found none. As STR is not indicated in the remarks, hotel pool participation is not supported.
Searched for 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or language indicating compulsory enrollment and found none. Since STR/rental program is not indicated, mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Looked for phrases such as 'lease expires 2050', 'land lease to 2065', 'leasehold expiring in 2040', or renewal language and found none. Without a stated year in the public remarks, the lease expiry is unknown.
Searched the remarks for phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', or 'VA loans accepted' and found no explicit mention. With no evidence in the public remarks, VA approval cannot be confirmed.
The public remarks do not state that the HOA maintains full/walls-in building insurance or comprehensive coverage. With no explicit mention and no user verification provided, the value is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit phrases indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation (FLSE) or similar certification and found none. Because there is no mention and no prior verified value provided, the default is false with medium confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
MLS data indicates 4 of 7 listings list ocean views and the public remarks repeatedly reference ocean/Pacific views (quotes: "Pacific Ocean", "ocean"). The mention appears across multiple listing variants (likely copy-pasted by agents) but is consistent and strong enough to indicate the building offers ocean-view units.
No analysis available
MLS data indicates 4 of 7 listings list Diamond Head views and the public remarks repeatedly reference Diamond Head (quotes: "Diamond Head", "Diamond Head/East facing lanai"). The repeated mentions across variants—though possibly copy-pasted—provide strong evidence the building offers units with Diamond Head views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit mentions of fireworks view from the building or unit. The remarks describe skyline, Diamond Head, ocean, sunrise, and city light views but do not state the building has views of fireworks.
No analysis available
6 of 7 current MLS listings include the RESMAN amenity checkbox. However, none of the public remarks explicitly mention a "resident manager," "on-site manager," or "live-in manager," and a few remarks state the building is "self-managed," suggesting possible agent copy/paste. The MLS checkbox majority supports inclusion but evidence is mixed, so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.