
1001 Wilder
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
1001 Wilder
Building Overview
1001 Wilder in Makiki-Tantalus, built 1964; pets allowed and short-term rentals not permitted.

About 1001 Wilder
Based on MLS data, 1001 Wilder is located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood and was built in 1964. Size (unit count or square footage) and construction type are not specified in the available MLS records.
According to available records, the building allows pets and does not permit short-term rentals. No additional amenities or common-area features are listed in the MLS data provided.
Management company, parking, maintenance fees, and other operational details are not specified in the MLS data. Buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or property management, as this summary is based solely on MLS information.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for a concrete owner-occupancy percentage like "80% owner occupied" or similar numeric language, but found only qualitative descriptions. The remarks support high owner occupancy, yet they do not provide an exact percentage.
I found evidence that the building has at least one elevator, but the public remarks do not state how many elevators there are. I searched for explicit count language like "multiple elevators" or a specific number, and nothing concrete was provided.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Evidence supports cable being included in the maintenance fee. The strongest confirmation is the remark stating the condo fee includes "cable," and the MLS data also shows CABTV selected in 8 of 9 listings, suggesting this is a building-level inclusion rather than a one-off agent error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Internet appears likely to be included based on MLS checkbox data in 7 of 9 listings. However, there are no matching remarks confirming internet/wifi, so this is supported mainly by repeated MLS data rather than explicit agent descriptions.
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is strongly supported by the MLS data, with 9 of 9 listings checked for sewer in association fees. No remarks explicitly mention sewer, but the unanimous current listing data makes this highly reliable.
Water inclusion is well supported by both MLS data and public remarks. The clearest remark says the condo fee includes "water," and 8 of 9 listings also show WATER in association_fee_includes, indicating a consistent building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is direct mention of car wash facilities in at least one listing: "guest parking & car wash & EV charging stations" on the upper level of the parking structure. The current MLS amenity data also shows car wash in 5/9 listings, suggesting the feature is legitimately present in the building even if not consistently entered by agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building has a recreation room/common party room. Multiple listings describe a "penthouse party room" or "Grand Penthouse recreation area/ party room with full kitchen," and several remarks also reference the space as an owner's lounge or multi-use room. With 7/9 current MLS amenity checks, this appears to be a real shared building amenity rather than a one-off agent copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is strongly supported across the listings and appears consistently in both MLS amenities and public remarks. Multiple agents explicitly mention a "large storage locker," "private storage locker," "your own storage locker," and "Extra storage locker," indicating this is not just copy-paste checkbox data. The building clearly offers storage units/lockers for residents.
This feature is directly confirmed in the public remarks. The listing explicitly says the building has "surfboard and bike storage," which matches surfboard storage exactly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Heated pool is consistently supported across the remarks: 7+ listings explicitly mention 'heated pool' or 'heated pool for your enjoyment.' Current MLS data also shows 8/9 listings with HEAPOO and 0/9 with HEATED in pool_features, suggesting the amenity is present even if a specific pool_features checkbox is not populated. The evidence is strong across multiple agents and appears repeatedly in building amenity descriptions.
I searched for wording such as saltwater pool, salt pool, or saline pool. Only a heated pool is mentioned, so there is no evidence that the pool is salt water.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for signs that the community laundry requires payment, such as coin laundry, card-operated machines, or quarters. The listings mention community laundry but never indicate whether it is paid, so there is no evidence to confirm this feature.
I searched for language like "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," or "floor-by-floor laundry." The remarks only support a general community laundry room, not every-floor laundry. Because the public remarks do not explicitly confirm this feature, it is set to false with low confidence.
No analysis available
Assigned parking is clearly present in this building. Current remarks mention it directly in multiple listings, including 'assigned parking stall' and 'assigned covered, corner parking stall,' and the MLS data shows 8/9 listings marked ASSIGN. This looks consistent across listings rather than a one-off agent error.
Covered parking is strongly supported by both MLS data and public remarks. Several listings explicitly say 'covered parking,' '1 covered parking,' and '2 FULL SIZED covered parking stalls,' matching the 8/9 MLS pattern for covered/garage parking. Evidence is broad and consistent across multiple agents.
I looked for phrases like deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in the deed. Instead, the listings consistently mention assigned/covered stalls and stalls rented from the association, which points away from deeded parking.
No analysis available
There is explicit evidence of a monthly parking rental fee, with the most common quoted rate being $50 per month and one example at $60. Because multiple rates appear, $50 is the best representative value from the remarks.
Guest parking is very well documented for this building. Multiple remarks explicitly mention 'ample guest parking,' 'copious guest parking,' '26 guest stalls,' and even an 'entire upper level of parking structure' reserved for guest parking. The MLS data aligns closely, with 8/9 listings indicating guest parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist or waiting-list language and found none. The listings instead describe rentable stalls being posted on a bulletin board, so there is no evidence of a formal waitlist system.
No analysis available
I looked for card/fob access terms such as key card access, fob entry, or electronic card readers. The building is described as secured with 24-hour security, but that does not establish card-access security.
Security guard service is strongly supported: multiple listings explicitly mention '24-hour security,' '24 hr security,' 'round-the-clock security,' and a 'secured building.' This appears consistently across several agents/listings, not just a single copy-paste mention, and the current MLS data shows SECGUA in all 9/9 listings.
I searched for explicit references to security patrol or roving patrol service. The listings only say 24-hour security or secured building, which is not enough to confirm patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction appears to be a stable building characteristic: 9 of 9 current listings have CONCRE checked in MLS. The remarks across multiple agents do not contradict this and consistently reference 1001 Wilder as a substantial condominium building, so this is high-confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 3 of 9 listings currently have ABOGRO checked, and none of the remarks explicitly mention above-ground construction or materials. This looks like weak, inconsistent MLS signaling rather than confirmed descriptive evidence, so confidence is modest.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit STR indicators such as short-term rental allowed, legal vacation rental, NUC, or TVU, but found none. The remarks consistently present the building as a standard residential condominium, so the available evidence leans against STR being allowed.
Because STR is not supported by the remarks, a hotel rental pool would also not apply. I found no references to hotel operations, pooled rental management, or branded rental programs.
I searched for mandatory hotel-pool language such as required participation, cannot opt out, or must rent, and found nothing. The listings describe normal residential ownership and use, not a compulsory rental-pool arrangement.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold language such as ground lease, lease expires, leasehold, or a renewal year, but found none. The remarks read like a standard condo listing, so there is no public evidence for a lease expiry year.
Public remarks directly identify the building as VA approved, so VA financing is accepted. No remarks contradict this, and the evidence is explicit and current.
Multiple remarks directly confirm that the building is fully insured, including a specific reference to full replacement insurance. This is strong public-remarks evidence, so confidence is very high.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for terms related to fire/life safety evaluation, FLSE, fire safety certification, and passed fire inspection, but found none. With no current value and no public-remarks evidence, this is treated as not confirmed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across several listings confirms city views at 1001 Wilder. At least 4 listings explicitly reference city, skyline, or cityscape views, and the language is consistent across different agents rather than a one-off copy-paste. This is a clear building-level feature for units with urban-facing exposures.
No analysis available
I did not find any remark support for garden/courtyard/landscaped views in the provided listings. Across the remarks, the recurring views are mountain, Punchbowl, ocean, and city skyline, which suggests the garden-view checkbox is likely not a reliable building-level feature here. This appears weak and possibly copy-paste MLS data rather than confirmed by remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit references to watching fireworks from the unit or lanai, or any building-wide fireworks view. The remarks discuss mountain, city, ocean, and skyline views, but nothing about fireworks, so this is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is strongly supported by the remarks: at least 2 listings explicitly say "resident manager" or "resident mgr & staff." The current MLS data also shows RESMAN in amenities for all 9/9 listings, which reinforces that this is a consistent building-level feature rather than an agent error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.