
Yacht Harbor Towers
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Yacht Harbor Towers
Building Overview
Yacht Harbor Towers in Ala Moana-Kakaako, a 40-story concrete tower (1973) with ocean and mountain views; on-site pool and fitness center.

About Yacht Harbor Towers
Yacht Harbor Towers is a 40-floor residential high-rise located in the Ala Moana-Kakaako neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1973 using concrete construction and offers ocean, mountain, and sunset views.
The building's listed amenities include a pool, fitness center, BBQ area, a resident manager, and a security guard. Units are served by central air conditioning. Based on MLS data, short-term rentals are not allowed and pets are not permitted.
Parking is reported as available, covered, assigned, with guest parking options. The management company is listed as Unknown in the MLS data. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all details, fees, rules, and current management information with the listing agent or association.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy figures such as "80% owner occupied" as well as descriptions like "majority owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied." The remarks discuss owner occupants versus investors in a general way, but they do not provide any percentage or reliable occupancy-level statement. Therefore the owner-occupancy rate remains unknown.
I searched for direct count language such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," or "multiple elevators." The remarks mention elevators as a building feature and proximity to elevators, but they never state how many there are. Because no number is provided, the count remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
Central air conditioning is clearly included in the maintenance fee. The MLS history shows ACCEN in 16/20 listings, and multiple remarks say 'central AC,' 'central air,' or 'A/C' is covered. The evidence is broad and repeated across many listings, suggesting a building-level inclusion.
Cable TV is strongly supported at the building level. The current MLS data shows CABTV in 18/20 listings, and numerous remarks explicitly state 'cable,' 'cable TV,' or 'basic cable' is covered in the monthly fee. This appears consistent across many agents and is not just a one-off mention.
Common-area costs appear to be included in the maintenance fee. The current MLS data shows OTCOEX in 12/20 listings, and several remarks explicitly reference 'common area expenses,' 'common area upkeep,' or similar wording. The evidence is strong enough to include, though it is less universal than water or sewer.
No analysis available
Electricity is one of the clearest included utilities in this building. The current MLS history shows ELECTR in 19/20 listings, and many remarks directly state that the fee covers electricity or all utilities. This is very strong, repeated evidence across the listing history.
Gas inclusion is strongly supported at the building level. The MLS history shows GAS in 15/20 listings, and many remarks list gas alongside electricity, water, sewer, and cable. The repeated wording suggests this is a real building feature rather than a one-off agent entry.
Hot water is clearly included in the maintenance fee. The current MLS data shows HOTWAT in 19/20 listings, and multiple remarks explicitly include "hot water" among covered utilities. This is extremely consistent across the listings.
Internet service is strongly supported as included in the maintenance fee. Many remarks explicitly say “internet,” “WiFi,” or “Spectrum internet,” matching the current MLS data showing INTSER in 18/20 listings. This appears to be a building-wide benefit.
No analysis available
Sewer is clearly included in the maintenance fee. The MLS history shows SEWER in 18/20 listings, and many remarks explicitly mention 'sewer' or 'water/sewer' as covered. This is consistent across the listing set and strongly supports inclusion.
Water is clearly included in the maintenance fee. The current MLS data shows WATER in 18/20 listings, and multiple remarks explicitly list water among the covered utilities. This is consistent and high-confidence across the building's listings.
Strong building-wide evidence supports BBQ as an amenity. It appears in many listings across different remarks, often as “BBQ areas,” “barbecue area,” “gas grills,” or “BBQ deck,” suggesting this is not a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
A dedicated car wash amenity is mentioned in multiple listings, including exact phrases like "car wash station" and "carwash." While not present in every remark, the repeated explicit references across listings provide strong support that the building offers this shared facility.
Several listings point to a clubhouse-like common room, even if the MLS checkbox is not broadly used. Phrases like “club room,” “rec center,” “party space,” and “recreation room” indicate a shared community amenity rather than a unit-specific feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Exercise amenities are confirmed by multiple listings, with remarks explicitly saying "exercise room" and "fitness center." This appears to be consistent building-level amenity evidence rather than a one-off unit feature.
No analysis available
The building appears to have a meeting room or equivalent community room. At least one listing explicitly says “meeting room,” and other remarks refer to comparable shared gathering spaces, reinforcing the amenity.
Strong, consistent evidence that Yacht Harbor Towers offers patio/deck-style outdoor amenities and outdoor living spaces. Numerous current listings mention an 'amenity deck,' 'patio deck,' 'recreation deck,' BBQ areas, and expansive lanais/open lanai spaces; this appears across many agents and not as a one-off copy-paste error. The current MLS pattern aligns with the prior high-confidence signal that this feature is present in the building.
Evidence against a building-provided path: only a few MLS entries historically flagged WAJOPA and the remarks overwhelmingly reference public park/nearby walking paths (Ala Moana Beach Park) rather than an on-site jogging/walking path. Agents appear to reference nearby park access, not an amenity within the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is good evidence that the building offers a recreation area or recreation deck. The remarks use several related phrases—“recreation deck,” “rec deck,” and “recreation area/space”—showing consistent building-level amenity coverage.
There is solid evidence that the building offers a shared recreation space, though the wording varies by listing. Multiple remarks describe it as a "recreation room," "rec center," or "recreation deck," suggesting the amenity is real but described inconsistently. This supports inclusion with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided remarks, 0 listings explicitly mention a sauna, steam room, dry sauna, or wet sauna. The amenities repeatedly listed are pool, jacuzzi/hot tub, tennis/pickleball, BBQ, recreation deck, and security, which makes the sauna checkbox look inconsistent with the public marketing copy. Given the lack of supporting remarks and the history of MLS checkbox copy-paste errors, the sauna feature should be treated as not present.
Building storage is clearly available: at least four recent listings explicitly mention it, including phrases like 'Storage available on a first come first served basis,' 'separate storage locker,' and a seller renting a 'storage unit for $40/month.' Another listing’s amenity list includes 'storage' with the pool, tennis court, and other shared facilities. Combined with MLS checkbox patterns and prior high-confidence data, this strongly supports that the building provides storage lockers/units for residents, typically on a rentable or allocated basis.
I searched for surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, and related combined storage language, but found no references. The remarks mention general storage in a few places, but nothing that specifically indicates surfboard storage facilities.
Tennis facilities are clearly a building amenity. Many listings mention "tennis court" or "tennis/pickleball courts," across multiple agents and unit types, which strongly confirms this feature.
Trash chute appears to be a confirmed building feature based on unanimous historical MLS data. The current remarks do not usually call it out, but the prior evidence is exceptionally strong and consistent across listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Whirlpool/hot tub/spa is well supported as a building amenity. Numerous remarks use explicit terms such as "whirlpool," "hot tub," "jacuzzi," and "spa," often alongside other resort amenities, which strongly confirms the feature.
The pool is strongly confirmed for this building. Dozens of current listing remarks from multiple agents explicitly describe the amenity, including phrases like 'swimming pool,' 'heated pool,' and 'heated saltwater pool,' often alongside jacuzzi and recreation deck. The evidence is consistent across many listings and appears to be a shared building amenity, not a copy-paste error.
Several listings (MLS shows 8 of 20 with HEAPOO) explicitly mention a heated pool—quotes include 'heated pool', 'heated saltwater pool', and 'heated swimming pool'—providing strong, building-wide evidence that the pool is heated rather than an isolated agent copy/paste error.
The remarks directly identify the pool as saltwater, including a heated saltwater pool. That is clear and repeated enough to support the feature confidently.
In-unit laundry is very strongly confirmed across the building. Numerous listings explicitly say 'in-unit washer/dryer,' 'washer and dryer in the unit,' 'stack washer/dryer,' or similar language, and this aligns with the historical MLS record showing 20/20 listings with washer/dryer included. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, so this feature should be treated as reliably present.
No substantive remark-level evidence for shared/community laundry facilities: 0 of ~20 public-remark blocks mention a "laundry room", "community laundry", or "coin laundry", while only 1 of 20 MLS amenity checkboxes includes COMLAU (likely an agent checkbox error). Given the absence of remarks and low occurrence in MLS amenities, community laundry is unlikely to be a building feature.
I looked for coin laundry, paid laundry, card-operated laundry, quarters, or any other indication that shared laundry requires payment, but found no such references. The remarks instead repeatedly mention in-unit washer/dryer, so there is no public-remarks evidence for paid community laundry.
I searched the public remarks for references to laundry rooms on every floor, floor-by-floor laundry, or similar wording, but found none. The listings mention in-unit washer/dryer in several places, which does not confirm community laundry on each floor.
No analysis available
Assigned/reserved parking is strongly supported across the building, with many listings explicitly stating assigned, deeded, or designated stalls. Current remarks repeatedly mention phrases like 'assigned parking stall,' '1 assigned parking spaces,' and '2 deeded, side-by-side parking stalls,' showing this is not a one-off agent error. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents and unit types.
Covered parking is overwhelmingly confirmed for this building. Across the provided remarks, dozens of listings explicitly say things like "covered parking," "1 covered parking stall," "two secured, assigned covered parking stalls," and "covered parking garage." The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and stacks, so this appears to be a stable building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
The remarks explicitly mention deeded parking, including a listing that says "two deeded, side-by-side parking stalls." That is direct evidence that parking is deeded/owned with the unit.
No analysis available
I looked for monthly parking charges, parking rental, or any additional parking cost language. The remarks only mention covered, assigned, deeded, and guest parking, but do not provide a separate parking fee.
Guest parking is well supported by both current MLS data and repeated remark language. Several listings specifically note 'guest parking available,' 'ample guest parking stalls,' and 'lots of guest parking,' which confirms this is an available building amenity. The mention appears across multiple listings rather than isolated copy-paste text.
Secured entry/secured parking is well supported throughout the listing set. Remarks mention 'secured building,' 'controlled building access,' '24-hour security,' and 'key fob providing secured access,' aligning with the MLS secured-parking indicators. This appears consistently across multiple units and agents, not just in copied boilerplate.
Several independent listings clearly describe 'tandem' parking arrangements, including '2 (tandem) parking stalls' and 'Tandem Parking Stalls are set apart in Garage'. With MLS data also marking TANDEM on some units, there is strong evidence that the building offers tandem-style stalls for certain residences.
No analysis available
I searched for "parking waitlist" or "parking waiting list" language and found nothing. The listings discuss assigned, deeded, covered, and guest parking instead, with no indication of a waitlist system.
No analysis available
The public remarks support card/fob-based access security. Language about key fob secured access and controlled/secured entry matches this feature well.
Security guard service is strongly supported across the building. Across the provided remarks, well over a dozen listings explicitly mention '24-hour security,' '24/7 security,' 'security guard,' or 'security patrol,' and several also note secured entry or preregistration with security. This appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error, so the feature should remain true.
The listings directly mention security patrol service multiple times. This is strong evidence that the building has patrol-based security in addition to guard/security coverage.
No analysis available
Central air conditioning is very strongly supported across the building. Multiple listings explicitly say "central AC" or note maintenance fees cover it, and the feature appears in both older and newer remarks from many different agents. This looks like a genuine building-wide amenity rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction is strongly supported for Yacht Harbor Towers. Historical MLS data shows 20/20 listings with CONCRE in construction_materials, and current remarks explicitly describe it as having "solid concrete construction." The evidence is consistent across many listings and appears to be reliable rather than copy-paste noise.
No listing remarks mention double wall construction, and the public descriptions consistently focus on views, renovations, and amenities instead. The small number of current DOUWAL checkboxes does not overcome the lack of supporting remarks, so this feature should be omitted as likely MLS checkbox noise.
No analysis available
Public remarks do not substantiate masonry/stucco construction for this building. Across the listing set, 0 listings explicitly mention 'masonry,' 'stucco,' or 'masonry and stucco'; the only construction-related language found points to 'solid concrete construction' instead. The sparse MLS code usage looks more like inconsistent agent input than a verified building feature.
There is no public remark support for steel frame construction. Across the supplied remarks, none explicitly mention a steel frame or steel frame construction, and the low current checkbox rate (3/20) looks inconsistent with the narrative data. This is best treated as a correction to false MLS checkbox noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
6 of 20 current MLS records list the 'ABOGRO' above-ground construction code, however none of the public remarks explicitly describe 'above ground' construction or materials. Because MLS checkbox presence is limited (6/20) and remarks lack explicit confirmation, the feature is included with moderate confidence reflecting mixed evidence and potential agent copy/paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for short-term rental indicators such as STR permitted, legal vacation rental, NUC, TVU, or hotel-style rental language and found none. With no supporting evidence in the public remarks, short-term rentals are treated as not allowed.
I looked for hotel pool or hotel rental program references such as Hilton, Trump, Ritz, or managed hotel operations and found none. Since the remarks do not support short-term rentals, hotel pool participation is also false.
I searched for language indicating a mandatory rental pool, such as required participation or inability to opt out, and found nothing. The remarks do not describe any hotel rental pool program, let alone one that is mandatory.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The leasehold expiry year is explicitly stated multiple times in the remarks. The strongest-supported value is 2037, with one listing giving the full date 6/30/2037.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA approval language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," or "VA loans accepted" and found none. Based on the available remarks, there is no evidence that the building is VA loan approved.
I searched for wording like fully insured, full insurance, fully covered, comprehensive building insurance, or walls-in coverage. The remarks repeatedly mention insurance only for common areas and flood/hurricane coverage, which is not the same as full walls-in coverage. Because there is no explicit full-insurance statement, I do not mark it as fully insured.
Across the listings reviewed, there are no explicit mentions of fire sprinklers, sprinkler systems, or fire suppression. The only related language is a 'new fire alarm system' and similar safety/security references, which do not support a sprinkler feature. This looks like weak or incorrect MLS amenity data rather than confirmed building equipment.
I looked for public-remark language indicating a passed fire/life safety evaluation or similar compliance statement. The listings mention a new fire alarm system and general safety/security features, but nothing that clearly says the building passed an FLSE or fire inspection. Based on the remarks alone, this is not confirmed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are overwhelmingly confirmed across the listings: essentially every remark references them, often in multiple places and with specific phrasing such as "breathtaking panoramic views of the ocean," "Pacific Ocean," and "unobstructed ocean views." The evidence is consistent across many different listings/agents and strongly suggests this is a true building-level feature rather than a copy-paste error.
Mountain views appear in a meaningful subset of listings, including phrases like “Koolau Mountains,” “mountain views,” and “lush green mountain views.” The evidence is spread across multiple remarks and unit types, supporting that some units in the building do offer mountain views.
I did not find clear remark language such as “Diamond Head view,” “DH view,” or “view of Diamond Head crater.” The MLS data may be conflating the tower name with the actual view, so the public remarks do not support treating this as a confirmed building-level view feature.
City views appear in numerous remarks, including “city skyline,” “city lights,” “wrap around city and mountain views,” and “ocean-city-mountain views.” This is well-supported across multiple listings rather than a one-off copy-paste mention.
Coastline views are confirmed by several remarks, including “coastline beyond,” “magnificent expansive ocean coastline,” and “shoreline” views. While mentioned less often than ocean or harbor, the references are consistent enough to keep the feature included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Marina/harbor views are heavily supported, with repeated references to “Ala Wai Yacht Harbor,” “yacht harbor views,” “marina views,” and “harbor views.” The consistency across many listings strongly confirms this feature for the building.
I found no meaningful remark evidence for sunrise views. The copy focuses on ocean, sunset, harbor, and city-light views instead, so sunrise is not supported as a dependable building-level feature from the public remarks.
Sunset views are strongly marketed in many remarks, including “stunning sunsets,” “sunset views from all rooms,” and “Friday night fireworks.” This appears repeatedly across listings and towers, not just isolated units.
No analysis available
The remarks repeatedly and directly state that units have fireworks views from the building/lanai. This is strong, consistent evidence that the feature is present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is strongly confirmed for Yacht Harbor Towers. Multiple current listings explicitly mention an on-site resident manager or resident manager’s office, and the historical MLS data is unanimous (20/20 listings with RESMAN). The evidence is consistent across many agents and does not look like a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.