Yacht Harbor Towers

No analysis available

No analysis available

I looked for explicit owner-occupancy figures like "80% owner occupied" as well as descriptive statements such as "majority owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied." The remarks do not provide any percentage or reliable proxy, so the owner-occupancy rate cannot be determined from these listings.

I searched the remarks for direct elevator-count language such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," or "multiple elevators." The listings only reference elevator upgrades and proximity to elevators, which confirms elevators exist but does not state how many. Since no count is given, the value remains unknown.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Central air conditioning is clearly included in the maintenance fee. The MLS history shows ACCEN in 16/20 listings, and multiple remarks say 'central AC,' 'central air,' or 'A/C' is covered. The evidence is broad and repeated across many listings, suggesting a building-level inclusion.

Cable TV is strongly supported at the building level. The current MLS data shows CABTV in 18/20 listings, and numerous remarks explicitly state 'cable,' 'cable TV,' or 'basic cable' is covered in the monthly fee. This appears consistent across many agents and is not just a one-off mention.

Common-area costs appear to be included in the maintenance fee. The current MLS data shows OTCOEX in 12/20 listings, and several remarks explicitly reference 'common area expenses,' 'common area upkeep,' or similar wording. The evidence is strong enough to include, though it is less universal than water or sewer.

No analysis available

Electricity is one of the clearest included utilities in this building. The current MLS history shows ELECTR in 19/20 listings, and many remarks directly state that the fee covers electricity or all utilities. This is very strong, repeated evidence across the listing history.

Gas inclusion is strongly supported at the building level. The MLS history shows GAS in 15/20 listings, and many remarks list gas alongside electricity, water, sewer, and cable. The repeated wording suggests this is a real building feature rather than a one-off agent entry.

Hot water is clearly included in the maintenance fee. The current MLS data shows HOTWAT in 19/20 listings, and multiple remarks explicitly include "hot water" among covered utilities. This is extremely consistent across the listings.

Internet service is strongly supported as included in the maintenance fee. Many remarks explicitly say “internet,” “WiFi,” or “Spectrum internet,” matching the current MLS data showing INTSER in 18/20 listings. This appears to be a building-wide benefit.

No analysis available

Sewer is clearly included in the maintenance fee. The MLS history shows SEWER in 18/20 listings, and many remarks explicitly mention 'sewer' or 'water/sewer' as covered. This is consistent across the listing set and strongly supports inclusion.

Water is clearly included in the maintenance fee. The current MLS data shows WATER in 18/20 listings, and multiple remarks explicitly list water among the covered utilities. This is consistent and high-confidence across the building's listings.

Strong building-wide evidence supports BBQ as an amenity. It appears in many listings across different remarks, often as “BBQ areas,” “barbecue area,” “gas grills,” or “BBQ deck,” suggesting this is not a copy-paste anomaly.

No analysis available

No analysis available

A dedicated car wash amenity is mentioned in multiple listings, including exact phrases like "car wash station" and "carwash." While not present in every remark, the repeated explicit references across listings provide strong support that the building offers this shared facility.

Several listings point to a clubhouse-like common room, even if the MLS checkbox is not broadly used. Phrases like “club room,” “rec center,” “party space,” and “recreation room” indicate a shared community amenity rather than a unit-specific feature.

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

Exercise amenities are confirmed by multiple listings, with remarks explicitly saying "exercise room" and "fitness center." This appears to be consistent building-level amenity evidence rather than a one-off unit feature.

No analysis available

The building appears to have a meeting room or equivalent community room. At least one listing explicitly says “meeting room,” and other remarks refer to comparable shared gathering spaces, reinforcing the amenity.

Strong, consistent evidence that Yacht Harbor Towers offers patio/deck-style outdoor amenities and outdoor living spaces. Numerous current listings mention an 'amenity deck,' 'patio deck,' 'recreation deck,' BBQ areas, and expansive lanais/open lanai spaces; this appears across many agents and not as a one-off copy-paste error. The current MLS pattern aligns with the prior high-confidence signal that this feature is present in the building.

Evidence against a building-provided path: only a few MLS entries historically flagged WAJOPA and the remarks overwhelmingly reference public park/nearby walking paths (Ala Moana Beach Park) rather than an on-site jogging/walking path. Agents appear to reference nearby park access, not an amenity within the building.

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

There is good evidence that the building offers a recreation area or recreation deck. The remarks use several related phrases—“recreation deck,” “rec deck,” and “recreation area/space”—showing consistent building-level amenity coverage.

There is solid evidence that the building offers a shared recreation space, though the wording varies by listing. Multiple remarks describe it as a "recreation room," "rec center," or "recreation deck," suggesting the amenity is real but described inconsistently. This supports inclusion with high confidence.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Across the provided remarks, 0 listings explicitly mention a sauna, steam room, dry sauna, or wet sauna. The amenities repeatedly listed are pool, jacuzzi/hot tub, tennis/pickleball, BBQ, recreation deck, and security, which makes the sauna checkbox look inconsistent with the public marketing copy. Given the lack of supporting remarks and the history of MLS checkbox copy-paste errors, the sauna feature should be treated as not present.

Building storage is clearly available: at least four recent listings explicitly mention it, including phrases like 'Storage available on a first come first served basis,' 'separate storage locker,' and a seller renting a 'storage unit for $40/month.' Another listing’s amenity list includes 'storage' with the pool, tennis court, and other shared facilities. Combined with MLS checkbox patterns and prior high-confidence data, this strongly supports that the building provides storage lockers/units for residents, typically on a rentable or allocated basis.

I searched the remarks for surfboard storage-related terms such as surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, and combined bike/surf storage, but found nothing. Some remarks mention general storage, which is not the same as surfboard storage.

Tennis facilities are clearly a building amenity. Many listings mention "tennis court" or "tennis/pickleball courts," across multiple agents and unit types, which strongly confirms this feature.

Trash chute appears to be a confirmed building feature based on unanimous historical MLS data. The current remarks do not usually call it out, but the prior evidence is exceptionally strong and consistent across listings.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Whirlpool/hot tub/spa is well supported as a building amenity. Numerous remarks use explicit terms such as "whirlpool," "hot tub," "jacuzzi," and "spa," often alongside other resort amenities, which strongly confirms the feature.

The pool is strongly confirmed for this building. Dozens of current listing remarks from multiple agents explicitly describe the amenity, including phrases like 'swimming pool,' 'heated pool,' and 'heated saltwater pool,' often alongside jacuzzi and recreation deck. The evidence is consistent across many listings and appears to be a shared building amenity, not a copy-paste error.

Several listings (MLS shows 8 of 20 with HEAPOO) explicitly mention a heated pool—quotes include 'heated pool', 'heated saltwater pool', and 'heated swimming pool'—providing strong, building-wide evidence that the pool is heated rather than an isolated agent copy/paste error.

The pool is directly identified as saltwater, including a heated saltwater pool. This is repeated clearly enough to support the feature with high confidence.

In-unit laundry is very strongly confirmed across the building. Numerous listings explicitly say 'in-unit washer/dryer,' 'washer and dryer in the unit,' 'stack washer/dryer,' or similar language, and this aligns with the historical MLS record showing 20/20 listings with washer/dryer included. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, so this feature should be treated as reliably present.

No substantive remark-level evidence for shared/community laundry facilities: 0 of ~20 public-remark blocks mention a "laundry room", "community laundry", or "coin laundry", while only 1 of 20 MLS amenity checkboxes includes COMLAU (likely an agent checkbox error). Given the absence of remarks and low occurrence in MLS amenities, community laundry is unlikely to be a building feature.

I looked for any language indicating paid laundry service or coin-operated/card-operated community laundry, but there were no such references. Several listings mention in-unit washer/dryer, which does not indicate a paid common laundry facility.

I searched the public remarks for references to laundry rooms on each floor, laundry on every floor, and similar wording, but found none. The remarks do mention in-unit washer/dryer in several listings, which is different from community laundry and does not support this feature.

No analysis available

Assigned/reserved parking is strongly supported across the building, with many listings explicitly stating assigned, deeded, or designated stalls. Current remarks repeatedly mention phrases like 'assigned parking stall,' '1 assigned parking spaces,' and '2 deeded, side-by-side parking stalls,' showing this is not a one-off agent error. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents and unit types.

Covered parking is overwhelmingly confirmed for this building. Across the provided remarks, dozens of listings explicitly say things like "covered parking," "1 covered parking stall," "two secured, assigned covered parking stalls," and "covered parking garage." The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and stacks, so this appears to be a stable building feature rather than a copy-paste error.

Multiple listings reference deeded parking, including explicit wording like "two deeded, side-by-side parking stalls." This strongly indicates parking is owned with the unit rather than rented.

No analysis available

I looked for language such as parking fee, monthly parking charge, parking rental, or additional parking cost. The remarks mention covered, assigned, and deeded stalls, but no separate parking fee was stated.

Guest parking is well supported by both current MLS data and repeated remark language. Several listings specifically note 'guest parking available,' 'ample guest parking stalls,' and 'lots of guest parking,' which confirms this is an available building amenity. The mention appears across multiple listings rather than isolated copy-paste text.

Secured entry/secured parking is well supported throughout the listing set. Remarks mention 'secured building,' 'controlled building access,' '24-hour security,' and 'key fob providing secured access,' aligning with the MLS secured-parking indicators. This appears consistently across multiple units and agents, not just in copied boilerplate.

Several independent listings clearly describe 'tandem' parking arrangements, including '2 (tandem) parking stalls' and 'Tandem Parking Stalls are set apart in Garage'. With MLS data also marking TANDEM on some units, there is strong evidence that the building offers tandem-style stalls for certain residences.

No analysis available

I searched for parking waitlist language such as "waitlist" or "waiting list" and found nothing. The remarks instead discuss assigned, covered, guest, and deeded parking.

No analysis available

The listings support card/fob-based security access with explicit references to key-fob secured access and controlled building entry. That matches the requested security_card feature well.

Security guard service is strongly supported across the building. Across the provided remarks, well over a dozen listings explicitly mention '24-hour security,' '24/7 security,' 'security guard,' or 'security patrol,' and several also note secured entry or preregistration with security. This appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error, so the feature should remain true.

There is clear public-remarks evidence that the building has security patrol service. The patrol language appears in multiple listings, so this feature is strongly supported.

No analysis available

Central air conditioning is very strongly supported across the building. Multiple listings explicitly say "central AC" or note maintenance fees cover it, and the feature appears in both older and newer remarks from many different agents. This looks like a genuine building-wide amenity rather than a copy-paste anomaly.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Concrete construction is strongly supported for Yacht Harbor Towers. Historical MLS data shows 20/20 listings with CONCRE in construction_materials, and current remarks explicitly describe it as having "solid concrete construction." The evidence is consistent across many listings and appears to be reliable rather than copy-paste noise.

No listing remarks mention double wall construction, and the public descriptions consistently focus on views, renovations, and amenities instead. The small number of current DOUWAL checkboxes does not overcome the lack of supporting remarks, so this feature should be omitted as likely MLS checkbox noise.

No analysis available

Public remarks do not substantiate masonry/stucco construction for this building. Across the listing set, 0 listings explicitly mention 'masonry,' 'stucco,' or 'masonry and stucco'; the only construction-related language found points to 'solid concrete construction' instead. The sparse MLS code usage looks more like inconsistent agent input than a verified building feature.

There is no public remark support for steel frame construction. Across the supplied remarks, none explicitly mention a steel frame or steel frame construction, and the low current checkbox rate (3/20) looks inconsistent with the narrative data. This is best treated as a correction to false MLS checkbox noise.

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

6 of 20 current MLS records list the 'ABOGRO' above-ground construction code, however none of the public remarks explicitly describe 'above ground' construction or materials. Because MLS checkbox presence is limited (6/20) and remarks lack explicit confirmation, the feature is included with moderate confidence reflecting mixed evidence and potential agent copy/paste.

No analysis available

No analysis available

I searched the remarks for short-term rental indicators such as STR permitted, legal vacation rental, NUC, or TVU, and found no evidence. With no affirmative remarks, the building is treated as not confirmed for STRs from public remarks.

I looked for hotel pool references such as Hilton, Trump, Ritz, or a hotel rental program and found none. Since STR is not supported by the remarks, this must also be false.

I searched for language indicating mandatory participation in a rental pool, such as required program membership or cannot opt out, and found nothing. With no STR support in the remarks, mandatory pool participation is also false.

No analysis available

No analysis available

The leasehold expiry year is directly stated multiple times in the remarks. The best-supported value is 2037.

I searched the remarks for explicit VA-loan language such as "VA approved" or "VA financing" and found nothing. Based on the public remarks, there is no evidence to support VA approval for this building.

I searched for terms such as fully insured, full insurance, fully covered insurance, comprehensive building insurance, or walls-in coverage. The remarks consistently describe insurance for common elements/common areas and hurricane/flood coverage, which is narrower than full building coverage. That supports false rather than fully insured.

Across the listings reviewed, there are no explicit mentions of fire sprinklers, sprinkler systems, or fire suppression. The only related language is a 'new fire alarm system' and similar safety/security references, which do not support a sprinkler feature. This looks like weak or incorrect MLS amenity data rather than confirmed building equipment.

I looked for phrases like fire/life safety evaluation passed, FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection. The remarks mention fire alarm improvements, but that is not the same as a formal passed safety evaluation. With no explicit pass language, I cannot mark this as true.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Ocean views are overwhelmingly confirmed across the listings: essentially every remark references them, often in multiple places and with specific phrasing such as "breathtaking panoramic views of the ocean," "Pacific Ocean," and "unobstructed ocean views." The evidence is consistent across many different listings/agents and strongly suggests this is a true building-level feature rather than a copy-paste error.

Mountain views appear in a meaningful subset of listings, including phrases like “Koolau Mountains,” “mountain views,” and “lush green mountain views.” The evidence is spread across multiple remarks and unit types, supporting that some units in the building do offer mountain views.

I did not find clear remark language such as “Diamond Head view,” “DH view,” or “view of Diamond Head crater.” The MLS data may be conflating the tower name with the actual view, so the public remarks do not support treating this as a confirmed building-level view feature.

City views appear in numerous remarks, including “city skyline,” “city lights,” “wrap around city and mountain views,” and “ocean-city-mountain views.” This is well-supported across multiple listings rather than a one-off copy-paste mention.

Coastline views are confirmed by several remarks, including “coastline beyond,” “magnificent expansive ocean coastline,” and “shoreline” views. While mentioned less often than ocean or harbor, the references are consistent enough to keep the feature included.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Marina/harbor views are heavily supported, with repeated references to “Ala Wai Yacht Harbor,” “yacht harbor views,” “marina views,” and “harbor views.” The consistency across many listings strongly confirms this feature for the building.

I found no meaningful remark evidence for sunrise views. The copy focuses on ocean, sunset, harbor, and city-light views instead, so sunrise is not supported as a dependable building-level feature from the public remarks.

Sunset views are strongly marketed in many remarks, including “stunning sunsets,” “sunset views from all rooms,” and “Friday night fireworks.” This appears repeatedly across listings and towers, not just isolated units.

No analysis available

The remarks repeatedly and directly state fireworks views from units and lanais. This is strong, consistent evidence that residents can see fireworks from inside the building, not merely be near the fireworks location.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Resident manager is strongly confirmed for Yacht Harbor Towers. Multiple current listings explicitly mention an on-site resident manager or resident manager’s office, and the historical MLS data is unanimous (20/20 listings with RESMAN). The evidence is consistent across many agents and does not look like a one-off copy-paste error.

No analysis available

No analysis available