Windward Acres
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Windward Acres
Building Overview
Windward Acres in Kaneohe, concrete construction (built 1988); pets allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted.
About Windward Acres
Windward Acres is a residential building located in the Kaneohe neighborhood, originally built in 1988. According to available records, the building is of concrete construction. Size details such as number of units, floor plans, or square footage are not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, key policy details include that pets are allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records. No additional amenity information (pool, gym, laundry, etc.) is provided in the MLS extract.
Information on parking, maintenance fees, HOA assessments, and other ownership costs is not included in the MLS data provided. Buyers and agents should verify all building details, policies, and fees with the listing agent, management, or condominium association before making decisions. This summary is based solely on MLS data available for Windward Acres.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy percentages like 80% owner occupied or broader language such as majority owner occupied. The remarks only provide a single-unit statement that one listing is owner-occupied, which is not enough to estimate a building-wide percentage.
I searched the remarks for elevator count, elevator access, and phrases like multiple elevators or four elevators, but found none. The building is described as a walk-up and as a 4-story structure with parking on the bottom level, so the current value of 0 remains unconfirmed but unchanged.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
14 of 20 listings include OTCOEX in association fees, suggesting common-area electricity is likely included. The public remarks across multiple listings repeatedly mention maintenance fees, low HOA fees, and amenities, but none explicitly call out common area electricity. This looks like MLS checkbox-based evidence with no clear contradictory remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 2 of 20 listings show HOTWAT, while 17 of 20 show WTRHTR in inclusions, which is a strong sign the units have their own water heaters rather than HOA-provided hot water. Multiple remarks reinforce this with phrases like 'tankless water heater for endless hot water,' so the fee does not appear to include hot water.
No analysis available
No analysis available
18 of 20 listings include SEWER in association fees, making this a high-confidence building feature. The public remarks across many agents do not mention sewer directly, but they also do not contradict the MLS data. The repeated checkbox pattern suggests this is likely reliable and not a one-off agent entry.
18 of 20 listings include WATER in association fees, which is strong, consistent evidence that water is covered by maintenance fees. The remarks repeatedly reference HOA/maintenance fees and building amenities, but do not explicitly dispute water coverage. This appears to be a stable building-level feature supported by many listings.
BBQ is strongly supported across the current remarks, with many listings explicitly mentioning a shared barbecue area, BBQ pits, or places to "bar-b-que." This appears to be a consistent building/community amenity rather than a one-off agent entry, and it aligns with the prior high-confidence MLS data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Dog park is explicitly referenced in multiple current remarks, including "small on-property dog park" and "Complex has ... a Dog Park." The repeated mentions across several listings make this a high-confidence shared amenity rather than an MLS checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is very strongly supported by the remarks and historical MLS data. At least a dozen listings explicitly mention it with phrases like 'storage area,' 'extra storage,' 'additional storage space,' 'deeded storage,' and 'assigned storage locker,' which appears across multiple agents rather than a single copy-paste source. This is consistent with the current MLS pattern where storage is frequently checked in both amenities and unit features.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Very strong, consistent evidence supports in-unit laundry for this building. At least a dozen current listing remarks explicitly mention washer/dryer in the unit, including exact phrases like "in-unit washer & dryer," "washer and dryer in unit," and "full-size washer and dryer." The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents and matches the current MLS inclusions, so this feature should be treated as confirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Assigned parking is strongly supported across the remarks, with many listings explicitly saying "assigned covered parking stall," "2 assigned parking stalls," or similar reserved-stall language. This aligns with the MLS pattern of 17/20 listings showing ASSIGN, suggesting this is a real building-level feature rather than copy-paste noise.
Covered parking is strongly confirmed across many listings, with roughly 20+ remarks explicitly mentioning it. Multiple agents describe it in consistent ways—'covered parking stall,' 'covered garage parking stall,' 'parking under the building,' and 'one covered and one uncovered'—which indicates this is a real building feature rather than copy-paste noise. The evidence is consistent and high-confidence.
I searched for public-remark language indicating deeded, owned, or parking-in-deed status and found none. Instead, the listings repeatedly describe parking as assigned, covered, or included with the unit, which supports non-deeded parking.
No analysis available
I looked for any monthly parking charge, parking rental, or similar fee language. While most remarks frame parking as included/assigned, one listing says additional stalls are available for rent, which indicates a parking fee can apply for extra parking.
Guest parking is mentioned directly in the remarks, including phrases like "guest parking is close to the unit" and "guest/street parking." The MLS pattern of 14/20 listings checking GUEST suggests it is a genuine shared building amenity, though less consistently noted than assigned or covered parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for any parking waitlist or waiting-list system and found nothing. The listings discuss assigned stalls, covered parking, guest parking, and rentable extra stalls, but do not mention any waitlist process.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Double-wall construction appears to be a building-level feature for this property. Current MLS data supports it strongly, with 17 of 20 listings marked DOUWAL. The public remarks reviewed do not explicitly mention construction type, but there is no evidence suggesting the feature has changed or was incorrectly entered.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for short-term rental approval wording, legal vacation rental references, NUC/TVU mentions, and minimum-stay rules, but found nothing. With no STR permission evidence in the public remarks, this is treated as not allowed.
I looked for hotel pool language such as hotel rental program, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, or managed-by-hotel references and found none. Because STR is not supported by the remarks, hotel-pool participation cannot be inferred and is set false.
I searched for wording indicating mandatory participation in a rental pool, such as required rental program, must rent, or cannot opt out, and found nothing. Since there is no STR evidence in the remarks, mandatory pool participation is also false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I found leasehold language, confirming this is a leasehold situation, but no 4-digit expiration year was provided. I looked for phrases like lease expires, lease ends, ground lease, renewed through, or extended to a specific year, and none were stated.
The public remarks repeatedly and directly identify the building as VA approved. One listing also references a VA assumable loan, which strongly reinforces the VA financing status.
I searched the remarks for HOA insurance wording, including fully insured and walls-in coverage, but found no such references. There is no public-remarks evidence to support a fully insured status.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit fire/life safety language such as FLSE passed, life safety compliant, fire safety certified, or passed fire inspection, and found nothing in the public remarks. With no supporting evidence, this remains unconfirmed and is treated as not evidenced in the listings.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are strongly supported across the remarks: multiple listings say "beautiful mountain views," "views of the lush Koolau mountains," "stunning Ko'olau mountain views," and "grand Ko'olau mountain range." With 11/20 current MLS view descriptions showing MOUNTA, this appears to be a real building-level feature available in some units rather than a stray agent error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, sunset views are not mentioned at all; 0/20 MLS view descriptions include SUNSET and several list NONE. Public remarks consistently reference mountain, ocean, or general scenic outlooks, which suggests agents are not describing sunset exposure and may be copying boilerplate view language. With no explicit sunset references anywhere, the feature is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence supports an on-site/resident manager for the building. The strongest remark says "property manager on site," and MLS amenities include RESMAN in 2 of 20 listings, which suggests the feature is present even if not consistently copied into every listing. This looks like a real building amenity rather than a private-unit feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.