Windward Acres
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Windward Acres
Building Overview
Windward Acres in Kaneohe, concrete construction (built 1988); pets allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted.
About Windward Acres
Windward Acres is a residential building located in the Kaneohe neighborhood, originally built in 1988. According to available records, the building is of concrete construction. Size details such as number of units, floor plans, or square footage are not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, key policy details include that pets are allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records. No additional amenity information (pool, gym, laundry, etc.) is provided in the MLS extract.
Information on parking, maintenance fees, HOA assessments, and other ownership costs is not included in the MLS data provided. Buyers and agents should verify all building details, policies, and fees with the listing agent, management, or condominium association before making decisions. This summary is based solely on MLS data available for Windward Acres.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy percentages and qualitative phrases indicating high owner-occupancy but found none. Because there is no numeric or clear qualitative evidence in the remarks, the owner-occupancy percentage is unknown (null) with low confidence.
Multiple remarks describe the property as a 'walk up', top-floor units, and stairway access to parking, which indicates no elevators. No listing mentions an elevator count, so the current value of 0 is retained with moderately high confidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is consistently described as assigned/covered stalls included with units, but there is no language indicating parking stalls are deeded/owned with the unit. Therefore parking_deeded is assessed as false.
No analysis available
I searched listings for terms like 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', 'parking rental' and found none. Parking appears to be included/assigned, so no parking fee is documented in the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for mentions of a parking waitlist or join/waitlist language and found none. Given repeated references to assigned stalls, there is no evidence of a waitlist system in the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR-permitting language and found none across the remarks. Listings present a conventional residential condo environment (owner-occupied, assigned parking, storage, pet-friendly, playground/BBQ), so STR is assessed as not allowed based on absence of any supporting remarks.
Because STR is not indicated and there are no references to a hotel rental program or hotel operations, hotel-pool participation is false.
With no evidence of a hotel/rental pool at all—and STR not allowed per remarks—there is no mandatory pool participation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Listings clearly indicate the property is leasehold with '18 YEARS LEFT ON LEASE', but none provide a specific expiry year. Per rules, return null when no explicit 4-digit year is given.
Multiple listings explicitly indicate the building is VA-approved and reference VA-assumable financing (e.g., 'VA-Approved Building', 'The complex is VA approved', '*VA ASSUMABLE LOAN*'), so VA financing is confirmed.
I searched the remarks for HOA insurance scope language (e.g., 'fully insured', 'walls-in coverage', 'comprehensive building insurance') and found no references. Without explicit wording, full HOA building insurance is not confirmed and is reported as false with low confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for terms like 'fire life safety evaluation', 'FLSE passed', 'fire safety certified', and 'passed fire inspection' but found no references. In the absence of any explicit statement, this is reported as not confirmed (false) with low confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.