Wilder Regent
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Wilder Regent
Building Overview
Wilder Regent in Makiki-Tantalus — concrete building (1971) with pool and ocean/mountain views.
About Wilder Regent
Wilder Regent is a concrete residential building in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood built in 1971. According to available records, unit size and total unit count are not specified in the provided MLS data.
Key features reported in MLS data include ocean and mountain views and an on-site pool. Air conditioning is listed as window units. The building's construction type is concrete, consistent with mid-20th century development in the area.
Additional MLS-listed details note that parking is available and assigned. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify specific unit sizes, fees, rules, management, and other details with the listing agent or management company prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy clues, including percentages and phrases like '80% owner occupied,' 'majority owner occupied,' or 'highly owner occupied.' The remarks only say the unit is suitable for owner-occupants in one listing, which is not the same as building-wide owner occupancy, so the percentage remains unknown.
Multiple listings directly confirm the elevator count. The clearest evidence is the phrase "upgraded with 2 newer elevators," which supports a value of 2 with very high confidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Multiple listings state that cable is billed separately rather than included, with exact monthly charges mentioned in at least two remarks. This is strong direct evidence from listing remarks and overrides any contrary checkbox data.
The MLS data suggests common area electricity is included, with 6 of 8 current listings marking OTCOEX. None of the public remarks explicitly mention common electricity or building power, so this relies on the MLS pattern rather than direct confirmation. Still, the repeated checkbox behavior across listings makes this a plausible building-level inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the listings, there is no support for hot water being included in maintenance. The strongest pattern is the opposite: most records show WTRHTR, which is a strong indicator that hot water is not a building-paid amenity. Public remarks are consistent with that pattern and do not mention hot water inclusion.
No listings' remarks state "internet included" or "wifi included." Instead, two remarks explicitly state "Cable is billed separately on the monthly maintenance bill" (quotes: "$56.00 per month" and "$52.52"). Only 1 of 6 MLS records has INTSER checked (likely copy/paste error), so evidence strongly indicates internet is not included in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
Sewer appears to be a consistent building-level inclusion across every current listing. There are 9/9 MLS records showing SEWER, and the remarks are silent on any separate sewer charge, which matches the MLS pattern. This is strong, repeated evidence across multiple listings/agents.
Water is included across all current listings, with 9/9 MLS records showing WATER in the association fee includes. The remarks do not conflict with that and do not mention water as a separate expense. This is strong building-level evidence repeated across multiple listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the 6 listings, at least 4 explicitly reference lanais, including multiple mentions of a large wrap-around lanai with 318 sq ft of outdoor space. Phrases like "2 lanais," "big wrap around lanai," and "lanai, which wraps around the unit" show that units in this building typically have significant outdoor patio/deck areas. The consistency of these descriptions across different listings and agents strongly supports that the building offers patio/deck-style amenities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly supported for this building. The amenity appears in 9 of 9 MLS listings, and several remarks explicitly confirm it, including phrases like 'this secure building includes a pool' and 'the building features a pool and newer elevators.' The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, so confidence is very high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is clearly present in this building. Multiple current listings explicitly mention "In Unit Washer & Dryer!" and "full-size washer/dryer," which strongly confirms the feature rather than a copy-paste checkbox error. The evidence is consistent across several remarks and aligns with the MLS inclusions data showing washer/dryer in all listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is strongly supported across the listings. Multiple remarks mention on-site parking explicitly, including "one reserved, uncovered parking stall" and "1 assigned parking space," which aligns with the MLS parking features. The evidence is consistent across several listings and appears to be reliable rather than copy-paste error.
Assigned parking is very strongly supported by both MLS data and public remarks. Several listings explicitly describe the stall as reserved/assigned, and the wording is consistent across multiple agents. This is high-confidence building-level evidence that the building offers assigned parking.
No analysis available
I searched for deeded/owned parking wording such as 'deeded parking', 'owned stall', or 'parking included in deed'. The remarks only indicate assigned or reserved parking, which does not establish that the stall is deeded.
No analysis available
I looked for any monthly parking charge, parking rental fee, or separate parking cost. The listings mention assigned/reserved parking only and do not state any fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for references to a parking waitlist, parking waiting list, or instructions to join one. The public remarks do not mention any waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence is limited and mostly comes from MLS inclusions rather than remarks. None of the public remarks explicitly say "window AC," "wall AC," or similar, so this appears to be a weak signal rather than a confirmed building feature. I’m treating it as possible but low-confidence because 2 of 9 listings include the ACWIUN code.
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS record: 9 out of 9 listings mark the building as CONCRE. None of the public remarks explicitly mention construction material, but there is also no evidence contradicting it, and the repeated MLS checkbox pattern suggests this is not a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
There is not enough support for hollow tile construction. Only 1 of 8 listings has HOLTIL in the MLS field, and the remarks across the listings focus on views, privacy, lanai space, and recent repairs/upgrades rather than building materials. This looks more like an unverified agent entry than a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
Just 1/6 current listings shows a STEFRA (steel frame) code, while the majority omit it and no remarks reference steel framing. The building is described as a conventional Honolulu high-rise condo, so the lone steel-frame checkbox is best interpreted as a mis-entry rather than proof of steel-frame construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Above-ground construction is not clearly supported by the remarks. The public text mentions the 11th and 12th floor, wraparound lanais, and building amenities, but nothing that directly confirms above-ground construction. The MLS checkbox appears in only 3 of 8 listings, which is not strong enough on its own.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I checked the remarks for explicit short-term rental permissions or restrictions, including NUC/TVU language and 30-day minimum rules. Nothing in the public remarks indicates STR is allowed, so this remains unsupported and treated as not allowed.
I searched for hotel rental pool language such as Hilton, Ritz, Trump, or other hotel-program references. The remarks contain no evidence of a hotel pool, and because STR is not indicated, this must be false.
I looked for wording like 'mandatory pool', 'must participate', or 'cannot opt out', but found none. There is also no evidence of any rental pool at all, so mandatory participation is unsupported and treated as false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold language such as 'lease expires', 'ground lease ends', or any renewal year, but nothing appeared in the remarks. With no land-tenure details provided, the expiry year cannot be determined.
I searched the public remarks for any explicit VA-approval language and found none. The listings discuss the unit, pool, elevators, and parking, but do not mention VA loan eligibility.
I reviewed the remarks for insurance-related wording that would indicate the HOA provides full walls-in coverage or that the building is fully insured. The listings do not mention insurance coverage at all, so there is no basis to mark this as true.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for fire/life safety evaluation language, including FLSE, passed inspection, fire safety certified, and life safety compliant. Nothing in the listings indicates the building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation, so this remains unconfirmed and treated as false due to no evidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are repeatedly confirmed across multiple remarks and appear to be a building-level selling point. At least 5 listings explicitly mention ocean views or 'some ocean,' which is strong evidence rather than a single-agent copy/paste.
Mountain views are strongly and consistently supported across the listings. Remarks mention phrases like "mountains," "Diamond Head, and mountains," and "cool mountain breezes," indicating this is not a one-off or copy-paste issue but a real building-level offering for some units.
Diamond Head views are explicitly stated in several independent remarks, including 'Diamond Head' and 'ocean, Diamond Head, city & mountain views.' While not every listing mentions it, the repeated references support this as an available view type in the building.
City views are clearly confirmed across the listings. Multiple remarks describe "Honolulu's skyline," "city views," "city lights," and "city skyline," showing broad agreement across different listings and agents.
Coastline views are not supported by the public remarks. The listings consistently emphasize ocean, city, mountain, and Diamond Head views, but not coastline-specific views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no explicit evidence in the remarks for sunrise views. The current data does not support this feature strongly enough to include as true.
Sunset views are not mentioned in the remarks, so the evidence is insufficient to validate this as a building feature. Current remarks focus on ocean, city, Diamond Head, and mountain views instead.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.