
Wilder at Piikoi
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Wilder at Piikoi
Building Overview
Wilder at Piikoi in Makiki-Tantalus (built 1979) — concrete construction with pool and ocean/mountain views.

About Wilder at Piikoi
Based on MLS data, Wilder at Piikoi is located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood and was built in 1979. The building is constructed of concrete. Size and unit count are not specified in the available MLS records.
According to available records, common amenities include a pool, BBQ area, and a resident manager. Units report ocean, mountain, and sunset views. Air conditioning is listed as window units.
MLS data indicates parking is available, covered, assigned, and there is guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS. This summary is based on MLS data; prospective buyers should verify all details with listing records or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for any owner-occupancy percentage or qualitative description of the resident mix and found nothing. Several listings mention the building is suitable for owner-occupants or investors, but that is not evidence of the actual owner-occupancy rate.
I searched the public remarks for an explicit elevator count (e.g., '4 elevators' or 'multiple elevators') and found no such mention. The remarks do refer to units being near or steps away from an elevator, but that only confirms elevator access, not the number of elevators.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
14 of 20 recent MLS listings include OTCOEX (common area electricity) in association_fee_includes, and no public remarks explicitly contradict this. Evidence is consistent across multiple agent listings (possible copy/paste risk), so we include common-area electricity in the maintenance fee with fairly high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
15 of 20 recent listings list HOTWAT in association_fee_includes and historical records gave high confidence that hot water is included. Public remarks do not mention a change or building-wide exclusion, so we treat hot water as included in the maintenance fee with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 20 recent MLS listings list sewer as included in the association fees. The public remarks across the listings do not contradict this, and there is no sign of a recent change or agent correction. Evidence is strong and consistent across multiple listings.
All 20 recent MLS listings list water as included in the association fees. The public remarks do not mention water service as excluded or newly changed, and there is no evidence of a correction. The pattern is consistent across the available listings.
BBQ is strongly supported across the listing set: roughly 19 of 20 MLS entries include it, and multiple public remarks explicitly reference shared grilling amenities. Examples include 'BBQ area,' 'BBQ pavilion,' 'BBQ stations,' and 'BBQ Area,' which looks like consistent building-level amenity data rather than a one-off agent error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Limited but consistent evidence: about 3–4 listings explicitly mention 'Clubhouse' / 'Club House' in their remarks and the MLS amenities, indicating the building offers a clubhouse/community room. Mentions are less frequent than BBQ, so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence: 13 of 20 current MLS listings have the PATDEC/COVPAT amenity checked and many remarks explicitly reference 'lanai', 'covered lanai', 'private lanai', or list 'Patio/Deck' in community amenities (e.g., "large private lanai", "covered lanai", "Patio/Deck"). Mentions appear across multiple agents and listings rather than a single copy/paste, indicating the building does offer patios/decks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sauna is consistently supported by both MLS data and remarks. About 11 of 20 listings show sauna, and multiple remarks explicitly say 'Pool, Sauna, BBQ Area,' 'sauna,' or list 'whirlpool, sauna, and BBQ pavilion,' indicating a shared building amenity rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
I looked for surfboard-storage language in the public remarks, including surfboard storage, board storage, and surf storage. Nothing in the listings indicates that the building offers dedicated surfboard storage facilities.
No analysis available
Implied evidence: 16 of 20 MLS entries indicate a trash/garbage chute, however 0 of the provided public remarks explicitly mention 'trash chute' or 'garbage chute'. Given the strong MLS checkbox prevalence but lack of explicit remarks, the feature is included with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Whirlpool-related amenities are repeatedly mentioned in current remarks, including 'jacuzzi,' 'whirlpool,' 'hot tub,' and 'pool, jacuzzi, sauna.' With about 10 of 20 MLS listings showing whirlpool in amenities and several remarks confirming it, this appears to be a real shared building feature.
Strong, repeated evidence across many listings confirms the building has a shared swimming pool. The remarks mention it in at least 20+ listings with phrases like 'with pool,' 'community amenities include... Pool & Jacuzzi,' 'resort-style amenities right downstairs including a pool,' and 'Heated Pool.' This looks like consistent building-level amenity data rather than a one-off agent copy/paste error.
No analysis available
I searched for any salt-water pool wording such as salt water pool, saltwater pool, salt pool, or saline pool. The remarks only confirm a pool/jacuzzi/whirlpool, so salt-water status is not supported.
Strong evidence that the building offers in-unit laundry: approximately 17 of 20 recent listings mention washer/dryer in the unit. Representative quotes include "in-unit washer and dryer" and "Stack washer/Dryer in unit," and these mentions appear across many different listings (not limited to a single agent), supporting a high-confidence inclusion of laundry_in_unit.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for laundry-payment terms such as coin laundry, coin-op, quarters, card-operated, or laundry fees. The listings only mention community/on-floor laundry and in-unit washer/dryer in some units, so there is no evidence that laundry requires payment.
Public remarks explicitly state that laundry is available on each floor, which directly matches the feature definition. This is repeated across listings, making it a strong and consistent signal.
No analysis available
Assigned parking is strongly supported across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly mention "1 assigned parking space," "assigned covered parking stall," and a specific stall number, which aligns with the high-confidence MLS pattern. This appears to be consistent building-level information rather than a one-off agent error.
Covered parking is very strongly supported. Across the remarks, agents repeatedly reference "secured covered parking," "covered parking stall," "covered garage parking," and "garage secured," matching the MLS data in all 20/20 listings. This is consistent across multiple listings and does not look like copy-paste noise.
I looked for explicit deeded/owned-parking wording such as 'deeded parking,' 'owned stall,' or 'parking included in the deed.' The listings only describe assigned, secured, covered, or garage parking, which is not enough to confirm deeded parking.
No analysis available
I searched for parking cost language such as 'parking fee,' 'monthly parking charge,' 'stall rental,' or similar wording. The remarks do not mention any parking-related monthly cost, so this remains unknown.
Guest parking is supported: 13/20 MLS listings show guest parking and several remarks explicitly mention "guest stalls," "visitor parking available," or "5 guest stalls." Multiple agents reference guest/visitor parking in remarks, providing strong evidence that the building offers guest parking.
Listings repeatedly describe secured or gated parking access, using phrases like “secured covered garage parking,” “parking in garage secured,” “secure entry to both the building and parking deck,” and “covered and secured parking stall.” Together with 10/20 MLS entries flagged for secured entry, this strongly supports that the parking area has controlled, secure access. The consistency across many units and agents confirms this is a stable building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit references to a parking waitlist, waiting list, or joining a list for a stall. Nothing in the public remarks suggests the building uses a waitlist system for parking.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit card/fob access terms such as key card access, fob access, card reader, or keycard entry. The listings support a secured building, but they do not confirm a card-based security system.
Security guard service appears to be a real building amenity. At least 4 listings explicitly say 'Security Guard' or list it among amenities, and many others describe the property as a 'secured building' or having 'secure entry,' which is consistent with on-site security. The repeated mention across different remarks suggests this is not just isolated copy-paste noise.
I searched for patrol-related language in the remarks, including security patrol, roving security, and patrolled building. The building appears to have security guard coverage, but there is no evidence of a patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Current MLS checkbox data indicates 13/20 listings include ACWIUN and multiple public remarks explicitly reference window air conditioning. Remarks include phrases like "Window AC Unit", "Window A/C Unit", and "Window AC!!", appearing across listings from different agents, supporting a high-confidence determination that some units in the building have window A/C.
This feature is supported very strongly by the MLS record: 20 of 20 listings list CONCRE for construction materials. While most remarks do not restate the building material, multiple listings mention "concrete floors" / "sleek concrete floors," which aligns with a concrete building and provides no evidence of a change. The evidence appears consistent across listings and not like a copy-paste correction.
While 7 of 20 MLS records show double-wall construction, the public remarks across the listings do not mention 'double wall' or similar phrasing. This lack of supporting language indicates the double-wall designation is not substantiated by agent remarks.
No analysis available
Although 4 of 20 MLS records include MASSTU, none of the public remarks mention 'masonry' or 'stucco.' The absence of corroborating remarks suggests masonry/stucco is not clearly supported by the listing text and may reflect inconsistent checkbox usage.
No analysis available
Six of 20 MLS records include SLAB and the building is consistently described as concrete construction (multiple mentions of concrete floors), implying a slab foundation is plausible; however, no listings explicitly state 'concrete slab,' so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 4 of 20 MLS records list BRICK, but none of the public remarks mention brick exterior or brick construction. This suggests the BRICK checkbox is inconsistent with agent remarks and likely not a true, building-level feature.
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators like STR permitted, legal vacation rental, NUC, TVU, or minimum-stay language. The remarks do not mention any STR allowance, so there is no evidence that short-term rentals are permitted.
I looked for hotel rental pool references such as hotel-managed, Hilton pool, Ritz pool, or similar program language. None appeared in the remarks, and without STR evidence this cannot be true.
I searched for wording like required to participate, mandatory pool, cannot opt out, or must be in the rental program. There is no such evidence in the remarks, so mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for language like 'lease expires 2050,' 'ground lease ends,' 'leasehold expiring,' and renewal terms such as 'extended through.' Nothing in these remarks provides a 4-digit lease expiry year, so the field remains unknown.
Multiple listings directly reference VA financing, including an assumable VA loan and explicit VA approval. This is strong public-remarks evidence that the building supports VA loan use.
The remarks directly confirm full building insurance coverage, which is strong evidence that the HOA/building is fully insured. The mention of 100% hurricane coverage further supports that the property carries comprehensive insurance.
No analysis available
I looked for direct language indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation or similar compliance statement, but found none. The remarks only mention future sprinkler work and a fire station nearby, which do not confirm an FLSE pass.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are consistently described across the listings, with multiple agents using explicit phrases like "ocean views," "sweeping ocean AND mountain views," and "breathtaking ocean, mountain, and city views." The evidence is strong across many listings and appears to be a genuine building-level feature rather than a one-off unit note.
Mountain views are mentioned repeatedly in the public remarks, often paired with ocean and city views. Phrases such as "mountain views," "Great Ocean and Mountain Views," and "breathtaking ocean, mountain, and city views" support a solid building-level conclusion.
Diamond Head is called out in several listings (CURRENT MLS: 5/20 records list DIAHEA) and the public remarks contain multiple explicit references like 'Diamond Head views', 'Diamond Head breeze', and 'panoramic views from the ocean to Diamond Head'. Although a newer tracked feature, repeated agent remarks across listings make this likely available in the building.
City views appear universal for this building in the listing data, with nearly every remark referencing city views, city lights, or city skyline. The MLS data and the remarks strongly reinforce each other, making this a very high-confidence feature.
No listings indicate 'coastline' (CURRENT MLS: 0/20) and the public remarks do not mention 'coastline', 'shoreline', or 'coastal view'. Given the absence across MLS checkbox data and remarks, we conclude coastline views are not a documented building-level feature.
Garden views are not supported by the supplied remarks. Unlike ocean, mountain, city, and sunrise-related language, there are no references to garden, courtyard, or landscaped views, and the MLS signal is extremely weak.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunrise-oriented views are supported by at least one explicit remark mentioning "sunrise coffee," with historical notes also pointing to morning sun or eastern exposure. This appears to be a smaller subset of units rather than a universal building feature, but it is still present.
There is clear evidence the building offers sunset views: at least 7 of ~20 listing remarks explicitly mention 'sunset', 'sunset skies', 'evening sunsets', or viewing fireworks/sunset from the lanai (examples: 'ending your day with sunset skies over the city', 'savoring evening sunsets', 'punchbowl and sunset skies', 'Friday fireworks'). These mentions appear across several independent listings, supporting inclusion as a building-level feature.
No analysis available
The remarks explicitly confirm views of fireworks from inside units, which satisfies the definition. This is not just proximity to fireworks; it is a direct view claim from the building/units.
No analysis available
Strong evidence across listings that the building has an on-site/resident manager: 14 of 20 current MLS listings include the RESMAN amenity and many public remarks explicitly state phrases like 'Resident Manager', 'resident manager', 'on-site resident manager', and 'resident Mananger'. Mentions appear across multiple agents and listings rather than being isolated, supporting a high-confidence true value.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.