Westview at Makakilo Hts 2
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Westview at Makakilo Hts 2
Building Overview
Westview at Makakilo Hts 2 in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale — wood-frame building (1993) with mountain views; pets allowed.
About Westview at Makakilo Hts 2
Westview at Makakilo Hts 2 is located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1993 using wood frame construction. Size and unit mix are not specified in the provided MLS data.
Key characteristics noted in MLS records include mountain views and a pet-friendly policy. Short-term rentals are not allowed per the available information. No additional amenity details (for example, pool or fitness facilities) were provided in the data set.
Parking is listed as available, covered, assigned, with guest parking also noted. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS information. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all building details, rules, and any applicable fees with the listing agent or management prior to purchase.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
MLS listings reach floor 2, and the county records 2 floors. The state registration also lists 2 floors, though its floor field is generally less reliable.
The county assessor records 172 residential units, and the state registration independently records 172 units for this building. These sources agree and the parcel contains only this building record.
I searched for an explicit owner-occupancy percentage and descriptions such as "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied." No owner-occupancy information appears in the remarks, so the percentage is unknown.
I searched for explicit elevator information, including elevator counts such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," or "multiple elevators." No elevator count or elevator-related statement appears in the public remarks, so the value is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
13 of 20 listings list OTCOEX in association fee inclusions, which is consistent with common-area electricity being covered. No public remarks explicitly mention common-area electricity, so the evidence is moderately strong but may partly reflect copied MLS data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 of 20 listings list HOTWAT, compared with 16 of 20 listing WTRHTR. Remarks also reference a tankless water heater and newly installed or replaced water heaters, indicating hot water is supplied at the unit rather than included as a building-provided fee benefit.
No analysis available
No analysis available
19 of 20 listings list SEWER as included in the association fee. Although public remarks do not separately discuss sewer charges, the repeated MLS data across many listings provides strong building-level evidence.
19 of 20 listings indicate WATER is included in the association fee. Public remarks do not independently mention water fees, but the nearly universal MLS inclusion across listings is strong evidence that the feature applies building-wide.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 of 20 listings' public remarks mention a car wash or related facility. The current MLS data shows CRWSH on only 4 of 20 listings, but there are no corroborating descriptions across multiple agents, so this appears to be an inaccurate checkbox rather than a building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Outdoor space is strongly supported across the building: at least 15 listings mention features such as “private covered lanai,” “spacious balcony,” “private patio and deck,” “large fenced yard,” or “private backyard.” The evidence comes from numerous distinct listing descriptions and is consistent with the current MLS amenity data, so patio/deck should remain included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 15 listings explicitly mention private, fenced, enclosed, expansive, or large yard space, including yards suitable for pets, gardening, and entertaining. The evidence appears across multiple distinct listings and agents, not merely an isolated MLS checkbox, confirming that the building offers private yard areas for some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is supported by both MLS data and multiple listing remarks. Historical data shows storage/additional storage appearing in a meaningful share of listings (5/20 in amenities, 3/20 in unit features), and at least one current remark explicitly notes 'ample storage' while another mentions a 'double door storage closet on lanai.' This looks like a real building feature rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
The listings mention nearby beaches, surfing-related scenery, private lanai storage, and exterior storage areas, but none identify a dedicated building or community surfboard-storage facility. Private unit storage does not qualify.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks do not describe a community swimming pool or its water type. Given the current context that the building has no pool, this remains false, with low confidence because the remarks do not independently confirm or deny it.
At least 12 distinct listings explicitly mention in-unit laundry, including "in-unit washer and dryer," "washer/dryer in unit," and "full-size stackable washer / dryer in unit." The evidence is strong across multiple listings and agents, and is consistent with the current MLS inclusion rate of 18/20 and the previously high-confidence determination.
No analysis available
The listings consistently reference in-unit laundry rather than shared laundry. No remarks mention coins, quarters, laundry fees, card operation, or another payment requirement.
The remarks repeatedly describe washers and dryers located inside individual units, including “Washer and dryer are conveniently located in the unit” and “in-unit washer and dryer.” No shared laundry facility on every floor is identified.
Parking is overwhelmingly established across the building: 20/20 current MLS records include parking features. Multiple independent remarks cite phrases such as "2 parking stalls," "two designated parking spaces," and "two assigned parking spots," confirming that parking is available to buyers.
Assigned parking is strongly confirmed by both MLS data and repeated remarks. Examples include "two assigned parking stalls," "two designated parking spaces," "two dedicated parking stalls," and "two reserved parking stalls," appearing across many independent listings.
Covered parking is strongly supported by both MLS data and remarks, with 17/20 current records containing covered or garage-related parking codes. Numerous listings explicitly state "one covered and one open," "both COVERED," or "covered parking right in front," showing the feature across multiple units and agents.
Multiple listings confirm that units typically have two parking stalls, often assigned or reserved. Assigned or dedicated parking does not establish deeded ownership, and no explicit deeded-parking language was found.
No analysis available
The remarks describe covered, open, assigned, reserved, guest, and dedicated parking. They provide no monthly or additional parking fee, so the amount cannot be determined.
Guest parking is consistently supported by 16/20 current MLS records containing the GUEST feature. Multiple remarks explicitly mention "ample guest parking," "several guest parking stalls nearby," "additional guest parking," and "guest stalls available," confirming this is a building-level amenity rather than isolated copy-paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings repeatedly discuss assigned, reserved, dedicated, and guest parking but do not mention a building parking waitlist. Based on the public remarks, no waitlist system is evidenced.
No analysis available
The listings mention private entries and assigned parking but provide no evidence of a card- or fob-based security system. Private or dedicated entrances alone do not establish card access.
No analysis available
The remarks describe the community as peaceful, quiet, well-managed, and tranquil, but none identify a security patrol service. These general descriptions are insufficient to establish patrols.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window A/C is explicitly mentioned in 1 listing: "cooled by ... window A/C." A separate listing describes split air conditioning, while 17 of 20 current MLS inclusion records contain ACWIUN; combined with the prior high-confidence evidence, support is strong across the building despite the specific window-unit phrase appearing only once.
Nine of 20 current listings identify CONCRE in the construction materials field. The public remarks focus on unit upgrades, views, roofs, and amenities and do not explicitly quote “concrete construction” or “reinforced concrete”; the checkbox evidence is consistent across a substantial portion of the listings but may reflect copied MLS data.
Sixteen of 20 current listings identify DOUWAL in the construction materials, consistent with the prior high-confidence assessment of double-wall construction. None of the provided public remarks explicitly mention “double wall” or “two walls,” so the evidence is primarily repeated MLS data rather than independent agent descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Nearly no support for steel-frame: just 1/20 recent listings checked STEFRA and none of the public remarks mention 'steel frame' or similar. With no historical backing and no remark-level confirmation, this appears to be an erroneous or isolated checkbox and is omitted.
No public remark explicitly references a concrete slab foundation or similar construction detail. While some units are described as ground floor, that is not sufficient evidence for slab construction. Current MLS data shows 7/20 listings with SLAB, which is too limited without remark confirmation.
No analysis available
Ten of 20 current listings identify wood-frame construction, supporting the previously high-confidence building characteristic. No remarks explicitly confirm the construction type, so the conclusion relies primarily on the repeated MLS pattern across listings.
There is no meaningful evidence in the public remarks for above-ground construction. Several listings describe ground-floor or single-level units, but those phrases do not indicate a building-wide above-ground construction feature. Current MLS data shows only 6/20 listings with ABOGRO, which is not enough on its own to override the lack of explicit remark support.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings refer generally to an investment or rental property, which does not establish permission for short-term rentals. No explicit STR approval or prohibition was found; absent evidence, STR is treated as not established and false.
The remarks contain no evidence that the building participates in a hotel rental pool or hotel-managed rental program. Because STR permission is not established, the hotel-pool feature must also be false.
The listings do not state that owners must participate in a hotel rental program. Since STR and hotel-pool participation are not established, mandatory participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for leasehold terminology, ground-lease information, expiration dates, and renewal years. No applicable lease-expiry information was found, so the value remains unknown.
The public remarks repeatedly and explicitly reference VA approval, VA loan assumptions, and VA financing availability. This is strong, consistent evidence that the building supports VA financing.
I searched for references to fully insured coverage, full insurance, comprehensive building insurance, and walls-in coverage. The remarks do not mention any qualifying insurance coverage or explicitly deny it, so this remains false with low confidence.
No analysis available
I searched for statements that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation, FLSE, fire inspection, or was life-safety compliant. No qualifying statement or explicit denial was found, so this remains false with low confidence based on the absence of evidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are strongly supported: 15 of 20 current MLS listings contain OCEAN, with remarks including “ocean views,” “breathtaking ocean and mountain views,” “dramatic ocean views,” “stunning coastline views,” and “expansive ocean view from Diamond Head to Kapolei.” Although some remarks appear duplicated or copy-pasted, the feature is independently described across numerous listings and clearly remains available in the building.
Mountain views are explicitly described in multiple listings from different agents, including remarks for units with "ocean and mountain views," "rare 270° panoramic views of the mountains," and "stunning views of the ocean, coastline, and mountains." The repeated references, together with 13/20 MLS listings containing MOUNTA, provide strong building-level evidence.
Diamond Head views are clearly confirmed, with 7/20 listings containing DIAHEA and several remarks stating "views of Diamond Head," "wake up to sunrise over Diamond Head," and views "all the way to Diamond Head." These explicit descriptions across multiple listings and agents strongly establish that the building offers Diamond Head-view units.
City views are not clearly supported by the remarks provided. While the MLS dataset shows 4/20 listings with CITY, the current public remarks do not explicitly mention cityscape, downtown, or urban views. This is therefore treated as unverified for this building.
Coastline views are strongly and repeatedly confirmed. Several listings directly advertise 'coastline views' or similar phrasing, and the historical summary already marked this as high confidence. The consistency across remarks suggests this is a genuine and marketable feature of the building.
Multiple listings (several distinct remarks) describe private fenced yards, tropical landscaping, lush landscaped grounds, and 'garden oasis' yard space—phrases include “private fenced yard with tropical landscaping,” “lush landscaping,” and “open greenery.” The language is consistent across different agents rather than a single copy/paste, implying the building offers garden/landscaped views or garden spaces for some units. Evidence is implied (not explicit GARDEN checkbox), so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunrise views are clearly documented in the listing remarks. Multiple agents independently describe eastern/sunrise exposure, with phrases like 'wake up to sunrise' and 'greet the Sun.' This is strong evidence that some units in the building offer sunrise views.
Sunset views are strongly supported across the remarks. Multiple listings explicitly mention sunsets, evening glow, and western/coastline light, which matches the prior high-confidence summary. This is not likely a copy-paste error because the wording appears across different listings and unit types.
No analysis available
The remarks describe ocean, coastline, Diamond Head, mountain, sunrise, and sunset views, but none state that fireworks are visible from the residences. References to beaches and nearby amenities do not establish a fireworks view.
No analysis available
Seven of 20 current listings identify RESMAN as an amenity, but none of the provided public remarks mention a resident manager or on-site building manager. The evidence is therefore based on partial MLS checkbox data rather than consistent confirmation across multiple agents, and may reflect copied amenity entries.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.