Westview at Makakilo Hts 2
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Westview at Makakilo Hts 2
Building Overview
Westview at Makakilo Hts 2 in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale — wood-frame building (1993) with mountain views; pets allowed.
About Westview at Makakilo Hts 2
Westview at Makakilo Hts 2 is located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1993 using wood frame construction. Size and unit mix are not specified in the provided MLS data.
Key characteristics noted in MLS records include mountain views and a pet-friendly policy. Short-term rentals are not allowed per the available information. No additional amenity details (for example, pool or fitness facilities) were provided in the data set.
Parking is listed as available, covered, assigned, with guest parking also noted. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS information. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all building details, rules, and any applicable fees with the listing agent or management prior to purchase.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I reviewed the remarks for an explicit owner-occupancy percentage or descriptive statements about owner-occupied status, but none were present. The listings mention that the community is pet-friendly and well-managed, but that does not provide an owner-occupancy figure.
I searched the public remarks for any explicit elevator references, including a count such as '4 elevators' or wording like 'multiple elevators,' but found none. The listings describe ground-floor, second-floor, and top-floor townhouse units, which suggests a walk-up style community rather than an elevator-served building, but the remarks do not explicitly confirm that.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
15 of 20 current MLS records list OTCOEX, so common-area electricity appears to be included in the maintenance fee. The public remarks don’t explicitly call it out, so this is driven mainly by the MLS data pattern and looks consistent across multiple listings rather than a one-off agent note.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The evidence points strongly to hot water not being included in the fee. Only 2 of 20 MLS records show HOTWAT, while 17 of 20 show WTRHTR, and remarks explicitly mention a “tankless water heater,” “new water heater,” and similar unit-level water-heating language.
No analysis available
No analysis available
19 of 20 current MLS listings include SEWER in association_fee_includes, making this a very strong building-level feature. No remarks contradict it, and the pattern appears consistent rather than copy-paste noise.
19 of 20 current MLS listings indicate WATER is included in the association fee, so this is a strong confirmed feature for the building. The remarks don’t explicitly repeat it, but the MLS pattern is highly consistent across the listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings' public remarks (0/20 in the provided remarks) mention a car wash, auto wash, or vehicle wash area. The MLS shows CRWSH checked on 3 of 20 current listings, suggesting checkbox errors or copy/paste by agents; because there is no corroborating remarks or user/site verification, the building is omitted for car wash but with low confidence due to some MLS checks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across many listings supports patio/deck amenities for this building. Roughly 15+ of the provided remarks mention outdoor spaces such as "lanai," "covered lanai," "private balcony," "private yard," or "outdoor entertaining," and the pattern appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error. This is consistent with the prior MLS evidence showing 9/20 listings checked PATDEC/COVPAT.
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 8 of the 20 listings clearly reference exclusive yard areas: 'large, fully fenced yard', 'private fenced-in backyard', 'private fenced yard with tropical landscaping', 'The fenced-in yard offers space for outdoor entertaining', and 'your own private yard that's perfect for entertaining, pets and kids'. These are consistently tied to specific ground-floor units across multiple agents, showing that some units in this building do offer true private yard spaces. Buyers seeking private yards would find suitable options here even though not all units have them.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is supported by both MLS data and multiple listing remarks. Historical data shows storage/additional storage appearing in a meaningful share of listings (5/20 in amenities, 3/20 in unit features), and at least one current remark explicitly notes 'ample storage' while another mentions a 'double door storage closet on lanai.' This looks like a real building feature rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
I searched for surfboard storage facilities or combined bike-and-surf storage mentions. The remarks only mention general storage and lanai closets, which do not confirm dedicated surfboard storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I checked for any pool references and specifically for saltwater/saline pool wording. There is no evidence in the remarks of a pool at all, so saltwater pool is not supported.
Strong evidence that Westview at Makakilo offers in-unit laundry. At least 4+ distinct recent remarks explicitly mention it, including phrases like "in-unit washer and dryer," "washer and dryer in the unit," "full-size washer and dryer," and "stacked washer and dryer." The pattern is consistent across multiple listings and agents, so this appears to be a real building feature rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
I looked for any indication that shared laundry requires payment, such as coin laundry, card-operated machines, or laundry fees. The remarks only reference in-unit laundry, so there is no evidence of paid community laundry.
I searched the public remarks for language like "laundry on every floor," "community laundry," or similar floor-level laundry references. The listings instead mention in-unit washer/dryer or stacked washer and dryer, which does not support community laundry on every floor.
Parking is strongly supported across the building: all 20/20 current MLS records have parking features, and many remarks explicitly mention "2 assigned parking stalls," "2 reserved parking stalls," "2 parking spaces," and "side-by-side parking stalls." This is consistent across multiple listings and appears to be well-established rather than a copy-paste error.
Assigned/reserved parking is well supported. Multiple listings explicitly say "two assigned parking stalls," "2 reserved parking stalls," and similar wording, matching the MLS ASSIGN flags in 13/20 records. The evidence is consistent across different agents and listing descriptions.
Covered parking is supported by both MLS flags and listing remarks. At least one listing explicitly states "Two reserved parking stalls (1 covered/1 open)," while many current records carry covered/garage parking indicators (16/20). This suggests covered parking is available in the building, though not every unit may have it.
I looked for explicit deeded-parking language such as deeded, owned stall, or parking included in the deed. The listings only describe assigned/reserved stalls and guest parking, which does not establish deeded parking.
No analysis available
I searched for any parking cost language, including parking fee, monthly charge, rental fee, or paid stall language. The remarks mention parking availability and stall types, but no parking price or fee information appears.
Guest parking appears to be available in the building. While not every listing mentions it, current MLS data shows 12/20 records with guest parking checked, and one remark explicitly notes "additional guest parking." The repeated MLS presence supports this as a building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for language about a parking waitlist, waiting list, or joining a list for a stall. The remarks do not mention any such system, so there is no evidence that parking is managed by waitlist.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for card/fob-based building security access language. The community is described as well-managed and pet-friendly, but no key-card or electronic access system is mentioned.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit patrol-related language in the listings. The remarks do not mention any security patrol service or similar patrolled-community wording.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window A/C is supported by current MLS data and public remarks. 12 of 20 listings include ACWIUN, and at least one remark explicitly mentions "window A/C," with no strong contradictory evidence. This appears to be a real building-level feature rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
Historical data previously indicated concrete construction. Currently 5 of 20 recent listings have the CONCRE checkbox checked, but zero public remarks reference concrete or reinforced/reinforced-concrete construction. The prevalence is mixed across agents and there is no explicit confirmation in remarks, so inclusion is implied rather than explicitly documented.
Double-wall construction appears to be a building-level characteristic supported by the MLS pattern: 16 of 20 recent listings list DOUWAL. The public remarks do not explicitly say "double wall," but there is no contrary evidence, and the repeated MLS flag across multiple listings suggests this is not a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Nearly no support for steel-frame: just 1/20 recent listings checked STEFRA and none of the public remarks mention 'steel frame' or similar. With no historical backing and no remark-level confirmation, this appears to be an erroneous or isolated checkbox and is omitted.
No public remark explicitly references a concrete slab foundation or similar construction detail. While some units are described as ground floor, that is not sufficient evidence for slab construction. Current MLS data shows 7/20 listings with SLAB, which is too limited without remark confirmation.
No analysis available
A majority of current listings (11/20) include wood frame in the construction_materials field, with no opposing evidence in remarks. Given the consistent low-rise townhome form of Westview at Makakilo, wood frame construction is strongly supported as the primary building type.
There is no meaningful evidence in the public remarks for above-ground construction. Several listings describe ground-floor or single-level units, but those phrases do not indicate a building-wide above-ground construction feature. Current MLS data shows only 6/20 listings with ABOGRO, which is not enough on its own to override the lack of explicit remark support.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit short-term rental indicators such as STR permitted, vacation rental allowed, NUC, or TVU. The remarks do not provide any evidence that short-term rentals are allowed, so the safest reading is that STR is not established here.
I looked for hotel-pool language such as hotel rental pool, managed by hotel, Hilton pool, Ritz pool, or similar. None appears in the remarks, and because STR is not supported by the remarks, hotel-pool participation is also false.
I searched for wording that would require all units to participate in a rental pool, such as mandatory pool, must rent, or cannot opt out. There is no such language in the remarks, so mandatory pool participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for leasehold language such as ground lease, lease expires, leasehold, renewed through, or expiring in a specific year. Nothing in the public remarks indicates the land tenure type or any lease expiry year, so this remains unknown.
The public remarks repeatedly and explicitly reference VA assumable financing for this building, which is strong evidence that VA financing is available. I found multiple separate listings mentioning VA assumptions, so this is a high-confidence true.
I looked for references to full HOA insurance or walls-in coverage, including phrases like 'fully insured' and 'comprehensive building insurance,' but found no relevant remarks. The public comments focus on unit features, views, and location rather than building insurance coverage.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for any language indicating a passed fire/life safety evaluation or similar compliance language, and found nothing. Since there is no explicit mention of FLSE or fire-inspection compliance in the public remarks, this feature cannot be confirmed from the provided text.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are well established for this building. Across many listings, agents explicitly describe 'ocean views,' 'unobstructed ocean views,' and 'ocean beyond,' which is consistent with the current MLS pattern of 14/20 listings mentioning OCEAN. This looks like a genuine building-level feature rather than a one-off agent mistake.
Mountain views are consistently referenced in the remarks, including phrases like 'mountains,' 'lush landscaping, mountain views,' and 'views of the mountains, Ewa plains.' Historical notes also indicated several separate listings describing mountain views, so this appears to be a real and recurring feature.
Diamond Head views are clearly supported by the public remarks and the MLS pattern. Multiple listings explicitly state Diamond Head visibility from the unit or living room, which makes this a reliable building feature. The evidence is strong enough to treat it as present for the building even though not every unit has it.
City views are not clearly supported by the remarks provided. While the MLS dataset shows 4/20 listings with CITY, the current public remarks do not explicitly mention cityscape, downtown, or urban views. This is therefore treated as unverified for this building.
Coastline views are strongly and repeatedly confirmed. Several listings directly advertise 'coastline views' or similar phrasing, and the historical summary already marked this as high confidence. The consistency across remarks suggests this is a genuine and marketable feature of the building.
Multiple listings (several distinct remarks) describe private fenced yards, tropical landscaping, lush landscaped grounds, and 'garden oasis' yard space—phrases include “private fenced yard with tropical landscaping,” “lush landscaping,” and “open greenery.” The language is consistent across different agents rather than a single copy/paste, implying the building offers garden/landscaped views or garden spaces for some units. Evidence is implied (not explicit GARDEN checkbox), so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunrise views are clearly documented in the listing remarks. Multiple agents independently describe eastern/sunrise exposure, with phrases like 'wake up to sunrise' and 'greet the Sun.' This is strong evidence that some units in the building offer sunrise views.
Sunset views are strongly supported across the remarks. Multiple listings explicitly mention sunsets, evening glow, and western/coastline light, which matches the prior high-confidence summary. This is not likely a copy-paste error because the wording appears across different listings and unit types.
No analysis available
I searched for direct fireworks-view language like "see fireworks from the lanai" or "fireworks view from unit." The remarks discuss ocean, Diamond Head, coastline, and sunset views, but nothing about fireworks views.
No analysis available
None of the listings’ public remarks reference a resident or on-site manager, even when describing community features and management quality. Only 7 of 20 MLS entries have the RESMAN amenity checked while most do not, indicating inconsistent checkbox use with no narrative support. Given the lack of explicit mention and the minority, likely copy-pasted checkbox entries, it is very likely this building does not have a resident manager on-site.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.