Westview at Makakilo Hts 2
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Westview at Makakilo Hts 2
Building Overview
Westview at Makakilo Hts 2 in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale — wood-frame building (1993) with mountain views; pets allowed.
About Westview at Makakilo Hts 2
Westview at Makakilo Hts 2 is located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1993 using wood frame construction. Size and unit mix are not specified in the provided MLS data.
Key characteristics noted in MLS records include mountain views and a pet-friendly policy. Short-term rentals are not allowed per the available information. No additional amenity details (for example, pool or fitness facilities) were provided in the data set.
Parking is listed as available, covered, assigned, with guest parking also noted. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS information. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all building details, rules, and any applicable fees with the listing agent or management prior to purchase.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for an explicit owner-occupancy percentage and descriptive phrases such as "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied." No owner-occupancy information was provided, so the percentage is unknown.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator references, including a count such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," or wording like "multiple elevators." None of these or any other elevator details were found, so the number of elevators is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Fifteen of 20 current listings list OTCOEX in the association fee inclusions, supporting that common-area electricity is included. No public remarks explicitly confirm or contradict this, so the evidence is moderately strong but may partly reflect copied MLS checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only two of 20 listings indicate HOTWAT, compared with 18 listing WTRHTR. Remarks specifically reference individual water heaters, including a tankless water heater and newly installed water heaters, while none mention hot water included in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Nineteen of 20 current listings list SEWER as included in the association fee. Public remarks do not discuss sewer fees, but the near-unanimous MLS data across listings provides very strong support.
Nineteen of 20 current listings indicate WATER is included in the association fee. No remarks explicitly mention water fees, but the feature is consistently reported across listings and is therefore strongly confirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings' public remarks (0/20 in the provided remarks) mention a car wash, auto wash, or vehicle wash area. The MLS shows CRWSH checked on 3 of 20 current listings, suggesting checkbox errors or copy/paste by agents; because there is no corroborating remarks or user/site verification, the building is omitted for car wash but with low confidence due to some MLS checks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across many listings supports patio/deck amenities for this building. Roughly 15+ of the provided remarks mention outdoor spaces such as "lanai," "covered lanai," "private balcony," "private yard," or "outdoor entertaining," and the pattern appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error. This is consistent with the prior MLS evidence showing 9/20 listings checked PATDEC/COVPAT.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Private yard space is strongly supported across multiple listings, with at least 10 current remarks explicitly mentioning a private, fenced, or large yard. Key phrases include "private fenced-in backyard," "large, fully fenced yard," and "wrap-around, fully fenced private yard," indicating this is a recurring building/unit feature rather than a single isolated claim.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is supported by both MLS data and multiple listing remarks. Historical data shows storage/additional storage appearing in a meaningful share of listings (5/20 in amenities, 3/20 in unit features), and at least one current remark explicitly notes 'ample storage' while another mentions a 'double door storage closet on lanai.' This looks like a real building feature rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
I searched for surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, and bike-and-surf storage references. The remarks mention general closets and storage but do not identify dedicated surfboard storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for pool references and specifically for saltwater, saline, or salt pool wording. The remarks contain no pool description, and the building context indicates there is no pool.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the building: at least 6 current remarks explicitly mention a washer and dryer inside the unit, including stacked and full-size configurations. This confirms the historical high-confidence conclusion and is consistent with the MLS inclusion data showing 16 of 20 listings.
No analysis available
I searched for coin-operated, card-operated, paid, fee-based, or quarter-operated community laundry. No such payment-related laundry language appears in the remarks.
I searched for references to laundry facilities on every floor, laundry rooms on each floor, or floor-by-floor laundry. The remarks do not describe community laundry facilities or their location.
Parking is strongly established across the building: at least 12 listings explicitly mention parking, including phrases such as "two assigned parking stalls," "2 parking stalls," "two dedicated parking stalls," and "2-parking unit." This is supported by consistent remarks from multiple listings and by MLS parking features in all 20 records.
Assigned parking is confirmed by multiple independent remarks, including "two assigned parking stalls," "2 assigned parking stalls," "two dedicated parking stalls," and "two reserved parking stalls." The repeated references across listings, together with 13/20 current MLS records marked ASSIGN, provide strong building-level evidence.
Covered parking is supported by 16/20 current MLS records with covered or garage-related features. The clearest remark states, "Two reserved parking stalls (1 covered/1 open)," while other listings mention covered lanais but do not necessarily refer to parking; the explicit parking statement is sufficient confirmation.
Multiple listings confirm assigned or reserved parking, but assigned parking does not establish deeded ownership. No explicit deeded-parking language appears in the remarks.
No analysis available
I searched for language describing paid parking, monthly charges, parking rental, or additional parking costs. The remarks only discuss assigned, reserved, or guest parking and provide no fee amount.
Guest parking is explicitly mentioned in at least one listing: "two assigned parking spaces and additional guest parking." It is also consistently reflected in current MLS data, with GUEST marked in 13 of 20 records, indicating the feature is likely building-wide rather than a single-unit claim.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings describe assigned, reserved, dedicated, and guest parking but do not mention a waitlist system. Based on the absence of any waitlist reference, this is assessed as false with limited confidence.
No analysis available
I searched for keycard, key card, fob, card reader, electronic access, or similar building-entry security language. The remarks do not mention a card- or fob-based access system.
No analysis available
I searched for security patrol, roving security, patrol service, or patrolled-building language. No security patrol service is described in the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window A/C is strongly supported: 13 of 20 current listings include ACWIUN, and one public remark explicitly states "window A/C." The evidence aligns with the previously high-confidence determination, although most remarks do not specify the cooling type and checkbox data may be copied between listings.
Six of 20 current listings identify concrete construction, consistent with the prior medium-confidence indication. However, none of the provided public remarks mention concrete construction, so the evidence is moderate rather than strong and may reflect inconsistent MLS entry.
Seventeen of 20 current listings identify double-wall construction, closely matching the prior high-confidence assessment. Public remarks do not mention the feature, but the broad consistency across listings makes this strong building-level evidence rather than an isolated checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Nearly no support for steel-frame: just 1/20 recent listings checked STEFRA and none of the public remarks mention 'steel frame' or similar. With no historical backing and no remark-level confirmation, this appears to be an erroneous or isolated checkbox and is omitted.
No public remark explicitly references a concrete slab foundation or similar construction detail. While some units are described as ground floor, that is not sufficient evidence for slab construction. Current MLS data shows 7/20 listings with SLAB, which is too limited without remark confirmation.
No analysis available
Ten of 20 current listings identify wood-frame construction, supporting the previously high-confidence building characteristic. No remarks explicitly confirm the construction type, so the conclusion relies primarily on the repeated MLS pattern across listings.
There is no meaningful evidence in the public remarks for above-ground construction. Several listings describe ground-floor or single-level units, but those phrases do not indicate a building-wide above-ground construction feature. Current MLS data shows only 6/20 listings with ABOGRO, which is not enough on its own to override the lack of explicit remark support.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks mention possible use as a rental property but do not indicate that short-term rentals are permitted. No explicit STR authorization or short-term rental program is identified.
The remarks contain no evidence of participation in a hotel rental pool or hotel-managed rental program. Because short-term rental permission is not established, this feature is also false under the prerequisite rule.
I found no language requiring units to participate in a hotel rental pool. Since short-term rental permission is not established, mandatory pool participation must also be false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language, including lease expiry, ground lease, land lease, and renewal dates. No specific lease expiration year was found, so the value remains unknown.
The remarks repeatedly and explicitly indicate that VA financing or assumption is available. This is strong, multi-listing evidence that the building supports VA financing.
I searched for references to full HOA insurance, comprehensive building insurance, fully insured coverage, or walls-in coverage. None appeared in the public remarks, so full building insurance coverage is not confirmed.
No analysis available
I searched for statements that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation, including "FLSE passed," "fire safety certified," "life safety compliant," and "passed fire inspection." No such language was found in the remarks, so there is no evidence of a passed evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are strongly established, with 14/20 MLS listings containing OCEAN and numerous remarks describing "ocean views," "unobstructed ocean views," "coastal views," and sweeping coastline views. The evidence comes from multiple distinct listings and includes views from living rooms, bedrooms, lanais, and private yards, indicating the building offers ocean-view units.
Mountain views are well supported, with 10/20 listings containing MOUNTA and multiple remarks explicitly stating "mountain views," "views of Makakilo's mountains," and "270° panoramic views of the mountains." The repeated references across different units and descriptions show this is a building-level offering, although availability may vary by unit orientation.
Diamond Head views are clearly confirmed, with 7/20 listings containing DIAHEA and several remarks stating "views of Diamond Head," "wake up to sunrise over Diamond Head," and views "all the way to Diamond Head." These explicit descriptions across multiple listings and agents strongly establish that the building offers Diamond Head-view units.
City views are not clearly supported by the remarks provided. While the MLS dataset shows 4/20 listings with CITY, the current public remarks do not explicitly mention cityscape, downtown, or urban views. This is therefore treated as unverified for this building.
Coastline views are strongly and repeatedly confirmed. Several listings directly advertise 'coastline views' or similar phrasing, and the historical summary already marked this as high confidence. The consistency across remarks suggests this is a genuine and marketable feature of the building.
Multiple listings (several distinct remarks) describe private fenced yards, tropical landscaping, lush landscaped grounds, and 'garden oasis' yard space—phrases include “private fenced yard with tropical landscaping,” “lush landscaping,” and “open greenery.” The language is consistent across different agents rather than a single copy/paste, implying the building offers garden/landscaped views or garden spaces for some units. Evidence is implied (not explicit GARDEN checkbox), so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunrise views are clearly documented in the listing remarks. Multiple agents independently describe eastern/sunrise exposure, with phrases like 'wake up to sunrise' and 'greet the Sun.' This is strong evidence that some units in the building offer sunrise views.
Sunset views are strongly supported across the remarks. Multiple listings explicitly mention sunsets, evening glow, and western/coastline light, which matches the prior high-confidence summary. This is not likely a copy-paste error because the wording appears across different listings and unit types.
No analysis available
The remarks mention ocean, coastline, Diamond Head, mountain, sunrise, sunset, and other views from units or lanais. They do not state that Friday night fireworks can be viewed from the building or its units.
No analysis available
None of the listings’ public remarks reference a resident or on-site manager, even when describing community features and management quality. Only 7 of 20 MLS entries have the RESMAN amenity checked while most do not, indicating inconsistent checkbox use with no narrative support. Given the lack of explicit mention and the minority, likely copy-pasted checkbox entries, it is very likely this building does not have a resident manager on-site.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.