Westview at Makakilo Hts 2
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Westview at Makakilo Hts 2
Building Overview
Westview at Makakilo Hts 2 in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale — wood-frame building (1993) with mountain views; pets allowed.
About Westview at Makakilo Hts 2
Westview at Makakilo Hts 2 is located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1993 using wood frame construction. Size and unit mix are not specified in the provided MLS data.
Key characteristics noted in MLS records include mountain views and a pet-friendly policy. Short-term rentals are not allowed per the available information. No additional amenity details (for example, pool or fitness facilities) were provided in the data set.
Parking is listed as available, covered, assigned, with guest parking also noted. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS information. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all building details, rules, and any applicable fees with the listing agent or management prior to purchase.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for an explicit owner-occupancy percentage and descriptions such as '80% owner occupied,' 'majority owner occupied,' or 'highly owner occupied.' No owner-occupancy information was found, so the percentage is unknown.
I searched the remarks for explicit elevator information, including '4 elevators,' 'four elevators,' and 'multiple elevators.' No elevator count or elevator description was found, so the number is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Thirteen of 20 current listings list OTCOEX, indicating that common-area electricity is likely included in the association fee. None of the provided remarks explicitly mention common-area electricity or building power, so confidence is moderate rather than high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only one of 20 current listings lists HOTWAT, while 16 list WTRHTR; remarks also mention a tankless water heater, a new water heater, or other unit-level water-heater installations. This conflicts with the prior high-confidence indication, so the feature is retained but with reduced confidence pending direct verification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Nineteen of 20 listings explicitly list SEWER as included in the association fee. No remarks mention sewer charges, but the consistency across many listings and the previously high confidence make this strong evidence.
Nineteen of 20 listings indicate WATER is included in the association fee. No public remarks explicitly mention water fees, but the consistent MLS data across listings and previously high confidence provide strong support.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 of 20 listings' public remarks mention a car wash or related facility. The current MLS data shows CRWSH on only 4 of 20 listings, but there are no corroborating descriptions across multiple agents, so this appears to be an inaccurate checkbox rather than a building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Outdoor space is strongly supported across the building: at least 15 listings mention features such as “private covered lanai,” “spacious balcony,” “private patio and deck,” “large fenced yard,” or “private backyard.” The evidence comes from numerous distinct listing descriptions and is consistent with the current MLS amenity data, so patio/deck should remain included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Private yard space is strongly supported across multiple listings, with at least 10 current remarks explicitly mentioning a private, fenced, or large yard. Key phrases include "private fenced-in backyard," "large, fully fenced yard," and "wrap-around, fully fenced private yard," indicating this is a recurring building/unit feature rather than a single isolated claim.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is supported by both MLS data and multiple listing remarks. Historical data shows storage/additional storage appearing in a meaningful share of listings (5/20 in amenities, 3/20 in unit features), and at least one current remark explicitly notes 'ample storage' while another mentions a 'double door storage closet on lanai.' This looks like a real building feature rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
No public remark identifies a dedicated community surfboard-storage facility. Private storage areas and proximity to beaches do not qualify as building-provided surfboard storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks do not describe a swimming pool or its water type. The existing context indicates there is no pool, but there is no remark-based evidence confirming or denying saltwater construction.
In-unit laundry is overwhelmingly supported across the building: at least 12 distinct listing remarks explicitly mention a washer and dryer inside the unit, with detailed phrases such as “full size stackable washer / dryer in unit” and “new full size front load washer and dryer.” The evidence appears across many listings and agents, and it aligns with the current MLS data showing 18/20 listings include washer/dryer.
No analysis available
The public remarks do not support the existence of paid community laundry. Multiple listings instead identify washers and dryers inside the units.
The listings consistently describe private in-unit laundry rather than shared floor-by-floor facilities. No remarks mention laundry on each floor or a laundry room available on every floor.
Parking is overwhelmingly established across the building: 20/20 current MLS records contain parking features, and many remarks cite "two designated parking spaces," "two parking stalls," or "two parking spaces—one covered and one uncovered." The evidence is consistent across many listings and agents, not dependent on a single copied remark.
Assigned parking is strongly confirmed by both MLS data and repeated remarks. Examples include "two assigned parking stalls," "two designated parking spaces," "two dedicated parking stalls," and "two reserved parking stalls," appearing across many independent listings.
Covered parking is strongly supported by 16/20 current MLS records and numerous explicit remarks. Key examples include "one covered and one open parking assigned," "2 parking stalls, both COVERED," "two reserved parking stalls (1 covered/1 open)," and "COVERED PARKING right in front."
The listings consistently describe two parking stalls, including assigned and reserved spaces. However, assigned or dedicated parking does not establish deeded ownership, and no explicit deeded-parking language was found.
No analysis available
The remarks discuss assigned, covered, open, and guest parking but provide no monthly parking fee. The parking cost cannot be determined from the public remarks.
Guest parking is consistently supported by 16/20 current MLS records and repeated listing remarks. Explicit examples include "ample guest parking," "additional guest parking," "several guest parking stalls nearby," and "guest stalls available," indicating a building-level amenity rather than an isolated unit claim.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings repeatedly reference assigned, reserved, dedicated, and guest parking. No evidence of a building parking waitlist was found in the remarks.
No analysis available
No card- or fob-based access system is identified in the public remarks. Private entrances do not by themselves establish card security.
No analysis available
The listings provide no direct evidence of a security patrol service. General descriptions of tranquility, privacy, or community management are insufficient to establish patrols.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window A/C is supported by 17 of 20 current MLS inclusion records and an explicit public remark stating 'window A/C.' The evidence is strong across the building, although most remarks do not independently describe the units, likely reflecting checkbox-based MLS reporting.
Nine of 20 current listings identify CONCRE in the construction materials field. The public remarks focus on unit upgrades, views, roofs, and amenities and do not explicitly quote “concrete construction” or “reinforced concrete”; the checkbox evidence is consistent across a substantial portion of the listings but may reflect copied MLS data.
Seventeen of 20 current listings identify double-wall construction, closely matching the prior high-confidence assessment. Public remarks do not mention the feature, but the broad consistency across listings makes this strong building-level evidence rather than an isolated checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Nearly no support for steel-frame: just 1/20 recent listings checked STEFRA and none of the public remarks mention 'steel frame' or similar. With no historical backing and no remark-level confirmation, this appears to be an erroneous or isolated checkbox and is omitted.
No public remark explicitly references a concrete slab foundation or similar construction detail. While some units are described as ground floor, that is not sufficient evidence for slab construction. Current MLS data shows 7/20 listings with SLAB, which is too limited without remark confirmation.
No analysis available
Ten of 20 current listings identify wood-frame construction, supporting the previously high-confidence building characteristic. No remarks explicitly confirm the construction type, so the conclusion relies primarily on the repeated MLS pattern across listings.
There is no meaningful evidence in the public remarks for above-ground construction. Several listings describe ground-floor or single-level units, but those phrases do not indicate a building-wide above-ground construction feature. Current MLS data shows only 6/20 listings with ABOGRO, which is not enough on its own to override the lack of explicit remark support.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks mention that a unit could be used as an investment or rental, but they do not establish short-term rental permission. No explicit STR authorization or qualifying legal-rental terminology was found.
The remarks contain no evidence that the building participates in a hotel rental pool or hotel-managed rental program. Because short-term rental permission is not established, this feature must be false.
The remarks do not state that owners must participate in a hotel rental program. Since STR permission and hotel-pool participation are not established, mandatory participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for leasehold terminology and specific expiration or renewal years. No applicable lease-expiry information was found, so the year cannot be determined.
Multiple listings explicitly reference VA approval, VA loan assumptions, or VA financing availability. This is consistent and strong public-remark evidence that VA financing is supported.
I searched for references to fully insured coverage, full insurance, comprehensive building insurance, and walls-in coverage. No qualifying insurance language was found in the remarks; without a current verified value, this remains false with low-to-medium confidence.
No analysis available
I searched for statements that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation, FLSE, fire inspection, or was life-safety compliant. None of these qualifying statements appeared in the remarks; without a current verified value, this remains false with low-to-medium confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are explicitly mentioned across numerous listings from multiple agents, substantially more than the 14/20 MLS records that contain OCEAN. Repeated phrases include "ocean views," "coastal views," "ocean horizon," and views extending from Kapolei or Ko Olina to Diamond Head, establishing this as a strong building-level offering.
Mountain views are explicitly described in multiple listings from different agents, including remarks for units with "ocean and mountain views," "rare 270° panoramic views of the mountains," and "stunning views of the ocean, coastline, and mountains." The repeated references, together with 13/20 MLS listings containing MOUNTA, provide strong building-level evidence.
Diamond Head views are clearly confirmed, with 7/20 listings containing DIAHEA and several remarks stating "views of Diamond Head," "wake up to sunrise over Diamond Head," and views "all the way to Diamond Head." These explicit descriptions across multiple listings and agents strongly establish that the building offers Diamond Head-view units.
City views are not clearly supported by the remarks provided. While the MLS dataset shows 4/20 listings with CITY, the current public remarks do not explicitly mention cityscape, downtown, or urban views. This is therefore treated as unverified for this building.
Coastline views are strongly and repeatedly confirmed. Several listings directly advertise 'coastline views' or similar phrasing, and the historical summary already marked this as high confidence. The consistency across remarks suggests this is a genuine and marketable feature of the building.
Multiple listings (several distinct remarks) describe private fenced yards, tropical landscaping, lush landscaped grounds, and 'garden oasis' yard space—phrases include “private fenced yard with tropical landscaping,” “lush landscaping,” and “open greenery.” The language is consistent across different agents rather than a single copy/paste, implying the building offers garden/landscaped views or garden spaces for some units. Evidence is implied (not explicit GARDEN checkbox), so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunrise views are clearly documented in the listing remarks. Multiple agents independently describe eastern/sunrise exposure, with phrases like 'wake up to sunrise' and 'greet the Sun.' This is strong evidence that some units in the building offer sunrise views.
Sunset views are strongly supported across the remarks. Multiple listings explicitly mention sunsets, evening glow, and western/coastline light, which matches the prior high-confidence summary. This is not likely a copy-paste error because the wording appears across different listings and unit types.
No analysis available
The listings contain extensive view descriptions but none state that fireworks can be watched from a unit, lanai, or the building. Proximity to beaches or coastal views does not establish a fireworks view.
No analysis available
Seven of 20 current listings identify RESMAN as an amenity, but none of the provided public remarks mention a resident manager or on-site building manager. The evidence is therefore based on partial MLS checkbox data rather than consistent confirmation across multiple agents, and may reflect copied amenity entries.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.