Westview at Makakilo Hts
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Westview at Makakilo Hts
Building Overview
Westview at Makakilo Hts in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale; built 1994 with concrete/wood construction and ocean, mountain and Diamond Head views.
About Westview at Makakilo Hts
Westview at Makakilo Hts is a condominium community located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood. According to available records, the property was built in 1994 and is constructed of concrete and wood frame. Size and unit count information is not provided in the MLS data.
Key features noted in MLS records include ocean, mountain, Diamond Head and sunset views. Units rely on window air conditioning. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed according to the provided data. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS information.
Parking is described as available with assigned stalls and guest parking. No monthly maintenance fee, association fee or other financial details are provided in the MLS excerpt. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all specifics, including management, fees, and unit dimensions, with the listing agent or association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for numeric or qualitative owner-occupancy statements like "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied." The remarks only say the homes are suitable for "owner-occupants or investors," which does not provide an occupancy percentage, so this remains unknown.
I looked for explicit elevator mentions such as "elevator," "multiple elevators," or a count like "4 elevators," and found none. The repeated walk-up/townhome language strongly supports a no-elevator building, so the current value of 0 is retained with high confidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
14 of 20 recent MLS listings mark OTCOEX as included, suggesting common-area electricity is usually covered at the building level. The public remarks do not clearly confirm it, but there is enough MLS-level consistency to include it with medium confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Recent MLS data strongly points away from hot-water inclusion, with 0 of 20 listings showing HOTWAT and 17 of 20 showing WTRHTR. Several remarks mention “new water heater,” “recently replaced water heater,” or similar phrasing, which is consistent with this feature being false for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
18 of 20 recent MLS listings include sewer in the association fee inclusions, which is strong building-level evidence. The remarks also back this up directly with phrases like 'Water, sewer, and trash included in association fees,' making this a high-confidence feature.
18 of 20 recent MLS listings indicate water is included in the association fee, and the public remarks directly confirm it. The repeated MLS pattern plus explicit remark support make this a high-confidence building feature.
There is no clear evidence of a common BBQ facility in the building. A few listings mention phrases like 'grilling on the deck' and 'plenty of room for BBQs,' but those appear tied to private yards/lanai spaces rather than a shared amenity. With only 1/20 current MLS listings checking BBQ and no consistent public-remarks confirmation, this does not look reliable as a building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is direct evidence of a shared car wash amenity in at least one listing, with the phrase "the community car wash area" mentioned explicitly. Current MLS data also shows 7 of 20 listings checking CRWSH, suggesting the amenity is present in the building and repeatedly carried by multiple agents rather than being a one-off typo.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across many current listings confirms building-level outdoor spaces: multiple remarks reference 'private covered lanai', 'covered lanai', 'private patio and deck', 'private fenced yard' and similar phrases. This appears consistently across different agent remarks (not isolated to a single copy/paste) and aligns with prior MLS checkbox data indicating patios/decks.
Public remarks do not mention an on-site jogging or walking path; 0 of the remarks describe a 'jogging path', 'walking path', or similar, while 3/20 MLS records have the WAJOPA checkbox checked. The checkbox entries likely reflect agent copy/paste rather than a true shared building jogging path, so the feature is omitted.
No analysis available
Many current listing remarks (25+ separate listing remarks) explicitly advertise private outdoor spaces using phrases like “private yard,” “private fenced yard,” “private backyard,” and “enclosed yard.” This aligns with prior MLS indications (PRIYAR present in historical data) and appears across multiple agents and listings rather than isolated copy/paste, giving strong evidence the building offers private yard units (especially ground-floor units).
No analysis available
I found no explicit mention of a building recreation area, recreation deck, or amenity/recreation space in the public remarks. A few listings reference a 'community playground' or nearby outdoor spaces, but that is not the same as a dedicated building rec area. Since only 2/20 current MLS listings show RECARE and the remarks remain silent on the amenity, the evidence does not support this as a building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building offers storage: current MLS amenities include storage in 5 of 20 listings and unit_features in 3 of 20, and at least 5–7 agent remarks explicitly reference storage (examples: "Spacious balcony has storage too," "dedicated exterior storage area," "Spacious storage in the attic," and "massive pantry—perfect for all your storage needs"). Mentions appear across multiple agent remarks rather than being a single copy/paste, supporting a high confidence that the building provides storage/lockers or additional storage spaces.
No analysis available
None of the public remarks reference a tennis court, tennis facilities, or any related amenity. With only 1/20 current MLS listings showing TENCOU and no corroborating remarks across the set, this feature is not supported by the evidence provided.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is strongly confirmed across the remarks and matches the historical MLS data. Multiple listings explicitly mention washer/dryer in the unit, full-size or stackable, and there is no meaningful contradiction across agents. This appears to be a consistent building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly present across the building. Across the supplied remarks, dozens of listings mention two parking stalls, assigned parking, covered/open parking, or designated spaces, so this is strongly supported and looks consistent rather than copy-paste error.
Assigned parking is strongly supported by both MLS flags and the remarks. Many listings explicitly say 'two assigned parking stalls' or similar, which is consistent across multiple agents and unit types, not a one-off mention.
Moderate evidence that covered parking is available for at least some units: 6 of 20 MLS records show covered flags and many remarks mention covered stalls (e.g., 'one covered and one open', 'both COVERED!'), implying covered parking exists but not for all units.
I looked for explicit deeded- or owned-parking language, such as deeded stall, parking included in deed, or owned stall. The listings describe assigned stalls and covered/open parking, but do not state that parking is deeded with the unit.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee language, including monthly parking charge, rental fee, or parking not included in the sale. The remarks do not mention any separate parking cost, so no monthly parking fee can be confirmed.
Guest parking appears to be a standard building feature. Multiple listings across the set mention guest stalls or ample guest parking, reinforcing the MLS flag and showing broad consistency rather than isolated marketing copy.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for parking waitlist or waiting-list language and found none. The listings instead emphasize assigned stalls, covered parking, and guest parking, which suggests parking is available without a waitlist.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is clearly present in this building and is repeatedly confirmed across many current listings. Multiple remarks explicitly mention window AC units in different units and contexts, including new 2026 installation, bedrooms, living room, and main bedrooms, which strongly supports this as a building-level feature available in some units. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a single copy-paste remark.
7 of 20 current MLS entries list CONCRE (concrete) in construction_materials. Public remarks contain only sparse, indirect mentions (one remark: "easy to maintain concrete flooring") and no agents explicitly describe a concrete building or reinforced concrete structure. Evidence is mixed — several MLS records indicate concrete construction but the listing text does not consistently confirm it, so include the feature with moderate confidence.
This feature is supported by strong building-level MLS data: 17 of 20 current listings show DOUWAL in construction materials. None of the public remarks explicitly mention double-wall construction, so this appears to be MLS attribute evidence rather than agent-copy remarks. Confidence is very high because the current listing data is consistent across most agents.
No analysis available
MLS checkbox evidence appears in 6 of 20 current listings, while the remarks are silent on construction materials. This suggests the feature is present in MLS data but not actively described by agents, so it may reflect copy/paste behavior rather than remarked-on detail.
No analysis available
Eight of 20 current listings list SLAB, but the public remarks contain no explicit foundation references. The evidence is moderate and mostly MLS-driven, which is common when agents reuse checkbox data without narrative confirmation.
No analysis available
Wood-frame construction is supported by current MLS data rather than by the public remarks: 8 of 20 listings have WOOFRA checked. None of the remarks explicitly describe wood-frame construction or a recent structural change, so this looks more like a consistent MLS attribute than agent copy explaining it. Because the feature appears in multiple listings without contradiction, it should remain included.
Only 7 of 20 current listings have ABOGRO checked, and the remarks do not explicitly describe above-ground construction. This looks like moderate MLS-only evidence, possibly from agent-entered building data rather than narrative descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit short-term-rental indicators such as STR permitted, legal vacation rental, NUC, TVU, or hotel-style rental language and found none. There is also no evidence of 30-day minimum or owner-occupant-only language in the remarks, so this is inferred as not allowed/unsupported from public remarks.
I looked for hotel pool references such as Hilton, Ritz, Trump, hotel rental program, or managed-by-hotel language and found none. Since STR is not evidenced in the remarks, hotel-pool participation is also not supported.
I searched for phrases like mandatory hotel pool, required participation, cannot opt out, or must rent and found nothing. There is no public-remarks evidence of any mandatory rental-pool arrangement in this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for leasehold terminology such as lease expires, ground lease, leasehold, renewal, or an expiration year and found nothing. No specific lease-expiry year is stated, so this remains unknown.
Public remarks repeatedly advertise VA assumable financing across many listings, which is strong evidence the building is VA loan approved. This is direct, repeated public-remarks evidence rather than inference.
I looked for insurance-related phrases such as "fully insured," "fully covered," "walls-in coverage," and similar HOA insurance language. No such wording appears in the remarks, so there is no basis to mark the building as fully insured from public listing text.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for fire/life-safety wording including FLSE, fire safety certified, passed fire inspection, and life safety compliant. Nothing in the public remarks confirms a pass, so this remains unverified and is treated as absent from the listing text.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are clearly supported across the building, with well over 20 remarks explicitly mentioning them. Phrases like 'sweeping ocean views,' 'peekaboo ocean view,' 'breathtaking ocean views,' and 'ocean views from the lanai/living room' appear repeatedly across multiple listings, suggesting this is a consistent building-level feature rather than a one-off agent error.
Multiple listings explicitly state mountain/hillside/mauka views (e.g., "mountain views", "hillside views", "mauka to makai"), appearing across numerous agent remarks. The evidence is consistent with prior high historical confidence that some units offer mountain views.
Several listings (multiple agent remarks) explicitly reference "Diamond Head" or "Diamond Head view" and phrases like "postcard-worthy views of the iconic Diamond Head", indicating Diamond Head views are available in some units. This direct, repeated language supports a high confidence inclusion.
Multiple listings mention city or city-distance views with phrases like "city and ocean views", "views of the city", and "city views in the distance", indicating some units offer city views. Evidence is explicit across several agent remarks and aligns with prior medium confidence.
Coastline views are directly supported by multiple current remarks, including explicit phrases like 'unbeatable view of the coastline' and 'coastline views.' Combined with the prior high-confidence MLS signal, this strongly confirms that some units in the building offer coastline views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
A handful of listings explicitly reference sunrise or morning sun (e.g., "take in the sun rise", "enjoy the sun rise", "sun rise from this private setting"), indicating some units provide sunrise exposure. Evidence is moderate and consistent with prior medium confidence.
Multiple current public remarks (at least ~15 listings in this corpus) explicitly reference sunsets or sunset views—quotes include "toast sunsets with jaw-dropping ocean and mountain views," "enjoy sunset skies," and "spectacular nightly sunsets." Historical data also indicated high confidence for sunset views, and the repeated sunset mentions across many different listings/agents indicate the building offers sunset views despite the MLS checkbox field showing none.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox shows RESMAN on 4 of 20 recent listings, but none of the supplied public remarks (~70+) contain phrases like "resident manager", "on-site manager", or "live-in manager." Evidence for a resident manager is weak and appears limited to some agents checking the MLS amenity box; further owner/property-manager verification or remarks explicitly mentioning an on-site manager would be needed to raise confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.