Westview at Makakilo Hts
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Westview at Makakilo Hts
Building Overview
Westview at Makakilo Hts in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale; built 1994 with concrete/wood construction and ocean, mountain and Diamond Head views.
About Westview at Makakilo Hts
Westview at Makakilo Hts is a condominium community located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood. According to available records, the property was built in 1994 and is constructed of concrete and wood frame. Size and unit count information is not provided in the MLS data.
Key features noted in MLS records include ocean, mountain, Diamond Head and sunset views. Units rely on window air conditioning. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed according to the provided data. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS information.
Parking is described as available with assigned stalls and guest parking. No monthly maintenance fee, association fee or other financial details are provided in the MLS excerpt. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all specifics, including management, fees, and unit dimensions, with the listing agent or association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for numeric owner-occupancy figures like '80% owner occupied' as well as qualitative phrases such as 'majority owner occupied' or 'highly owner occupied.' No such language appears in the public remarks, so owner occupancy cannot be determined from this data.
I searched the remarks for explicit elevator language such as "elevators," "multiple elevators," or a stated count, and found none. Instead, the listings consistently describe stairs, walk-up access, second-floor units, and ground-floor units, which strongly indicates there are no elevators in this building.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
13 of 20 recent MLS listings mark OTCOEX as included, which suggests common-area electricity is usually covered. The public remarks do not explicitly call this out, so the evidence is mostly from the MLS checkbox pattern rather than agent descriptions. Overall this looks moderately consistent across listings, but not directly verified in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Recent MLS data strongly points away from hot-water inclusion: 0 of 20 listings have HOTWAT while 17 of 20 list WTRHTR. Several public remarks reference unit water heaters, including phrases like "new water heater" and "brand new water heater," which is consistent with hot water being provided in-unit rather than through HOA fees. This is strong cross-listing evidence and not just a copy-paste checkbox artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
18 of 20 recent MLS listings mark sewer as included, which is strong MLS-level support. At least one remark directly says "Water, sewer, and trash included in association fees," confirming the checkbox data with plain-language wording. The evidence is consistent and appears reliable across listings.
18 of 20 recent MLS listings indicate water is included in the association fee, and remarks explicitly reinforce this with wording like "Water, sewer, and trash included in association fees." The repeated pattern across recent listings suggests this is a building-level inclusion rather than an isolated agent entry. Confidence is high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
6 of 20 current MLS listings include the CRWSH amenity checkbox, but 0 of the provided public remarks mention 'car wash', 'auto wash', or similar. The checkbox usage is inconsistent across listings and may reflect agent copy/paste; there is implied building-level car wash presence from MLS fields but no explicit corroborating remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across many current listings confirms building-level outdoor spaces: multiple remarks reference 'private covered lanai', 'covered lanai', 'private patio and deck', 'private fenced yard' and similar phrases. This appears consistently across different agent remarks (not isolated to a single copy/paste) and aligns with prior MLS checkbox data indicating patios/decks.
Public remarks do not mention an on-site jogging or walking path; 0 of the remarks describe a 'jogging path', 'walking path', or similar, while 3/20 MLS records have the WAJOPA checkbox checked. The checkbox entries likely reflect agent copy/paste rather than a true shared building jogging path, so the feature is omitted.
No analysis available
Many current listing remarks (25+ separate listing remarks) explicitly advertise private outdoor spaces using phrases like “private yard,” “private fenced yard,” “private backyard,” and “enclosed yard.” This aligns with prior MLS indications (PRIYAR present in historical data) and appears across multiple agents and listings rather than isolated copy/paste, giving strong evidence the building offers private yard units (especially ground-floor units).
No analysis available
No listings' public remarks mention a building recreation area or amenity/rec deck; 0 of 40 public-remarks blocks reference 'recreation area' or similar, while only 2/20 MLS records currently have the RECARE checkbox set. Evidence points to agent checkbox inconsistency rather than an actual shared recreation area, so the feature is omitted.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building offers storage: current MLS amenities include storage in 5 of 20 listings and unit_features in 3 of 20, and at least 5–7 agent remarks explicitly reference storage (examples: "Spacious balcony has storage too," "dedicated exterior storage area," "Spacious storage in the attic," and "massive pantry—perfect for all your storage needs"). Mentions appear across multiple agent remarks rather than being a single copy/paste, supporting a high confidence that the building provides storage/lockers or additional storage spaces.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence across the listings confirms in-unit laundry for this building. All 20 current MLS listings include washer/dryer in inclusions, and numerous public remarks explicitly mention it in phrases such as "in-unit washer and dryer," "washer and dryer in the unit," and "new washer and dryer." This appears to be repeated across multiple agents and is not just copy-paste checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly present across the building: 20 of 20 current MLS records include parking flags, and the remarks repeatedly mention features like "2 parking stalls," "covered parking," "assigned parking," and stalls located right in front of the unit. The evidence is strong and consistent across many listings, not a one-off agent error.
Assigned parking is strongly supported by both the MLS flags and the remarks. At least 16 of 20 current records include ASSIGN, and multiple listings specifically describe "two assigned parking stalls," "designated parking spots," or "assigned stalls included."
Moderate evidence that covered parking is available for at least some units: 6 of 20 MLS records show covered flags and many remarks mention covered stalls (e.g., 'one covered and one open', 'both COVERED!'), implying covered parking exists but not for all units.
I looked for explicit deeded/owned parking language such as deeded stall, parking included in deed, or owned parking. The remarks only describe assigned stalls, which does not establish deeded parking.
No analysis available
I searched for monthly parking fees, parking rentals, or any separate charge for stalls. The listings mention assigned, covered, open, and guest parking, but nothing about a parking fee.
Guest parking appears to be a standard building feature. Current MLS data shows GUEST in 18 of 20 listings, and many remarks independently confirm it with phrases like "ample guest parking," "guest parking available," and "guest stalls nearby."
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any reference to a parking waitlist, waiting list, or needing to join a list for a stall. The remarks provide the opposite impression by consistently describing assigned parking, so there is no evidence of a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is clearly present in this building and appears in multiple recent remarks across different listings. At least 6+ listings explicitly mention 'window AC units,' 'window AC in both bedrooms,' or similar wording, which strongly confirms the feature rather than a checkbox copy-paste error. The current evidence aligns with the historical MLS confidence, so this feature should remain included.
7 of 20 current MLS entries list CONCRE (concrete) in construction_materials. Public remarks contain only sparse, indirect mentions (one remark: "easy to maintain concrete flooring") and no agents explicitly describe a concrete building or reinforced concrete structure. Evidence is mixed — several MLS records indicate concrete construction but the listing text does not consistently confirm it, so include the feature with moderate confidence.
This is supported by 18 of 20 current MLS listings, which is overwhelming building-level evidence. The public remarks do not mention construction, but the near-universal MLS checkbox pattern strongly indicates double-wall construction for the building.
No analysis available
MLS checkbox evidence appears in 6 of 20 current listings, while the remarks are silent on construction materials. This suggests the feature is present in MLS data but not actively described by agents, so it may reflect copy/paste behavior rather than remarked-on detail.
No analysis available
Eight of 20 current listings list SLAB, but the public remarks contain no explicit foundation references. The evidence is moderate and mostly MLS-driven, which is common when agents reuse checkbox data without narrative confirmation.
No analysis available
MLS shows 8/20 listings with 'WOOFRA' (wood frame) checked but none of the public remarks explicitly state 'wood frame' or describe wood-frame details. Evidence is limited to agent-entered MLS checkboxes across multiple listings and may reflect copy/paste; confidence is moderate (0.72).
Only 7 of 20 current listings have ABOGRO checked, and the remarks do not explicitly describe above-ground construction. This looks like moderate MLS-only evidence, possibly from agent-entered building data rather than narrative descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR indicators such as short-term rental allowed, vacation rental language, NUC/TVU references, or minimum-stay rules. The remarks do not mention any of these, so there is no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed.
I looked for hotel rental pool references such as hotel program participation or branded pool systems like Hilton, Ritz, or Trump pool. Nothing in the listings suggests this building participates in a hotel rental pool.
I searched for language indicating mandatory participation, required rental programs, or inability to opt out. The remarks contain none of that, so there is no evidence of a mandatory pool arrangement.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for leasehold language such as lease expiry, ground lease end, renewal, or a 4-digit expiration year. The listings instead describe the property as fee simple, so there is no lease expiry year to extract.
The public remarks repeatedly advertise VA assumable financing for different units, including specific rates and loan assumption language. This is strong, repeated evidence that VA financing is accepted in the building.
I looked for insurance wording that would indicate the HOA/building is fully insured or has walls-in coverage. The remarks discuss renovations, views, parking, and unit features, but they do not mention building insurance status.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for any fire/life safety compliance language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection. Nothing in the listings referenced those items, so there is no public-remarks evidence to confirm the building has passed an evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Numerous listings (20+) explicitly mention ocean or ocean-horizon views, with quotes such as "ocean views", "peekaboo ocean view", and "sweeping ocean views" appearing across multiple agents' remarks. Evidence is strong and consistent across many listings and agents, matching prior high historical confidence.
Multiple listings explicitly state mountain/hillside/mauka views (e.g., "mountain views", "hillside views", "mauka to makai"), appearing across numerous agent remarks. The evidence is consistent with prior high historical confidence that some units offer mountain views.
Several listings (multiple agent remarks) explicitly reference "Diamond Head" or "Diamond Head view" and phrases like "postcard-worthy views of the iconic Diamond Head", indicating Diamond Head views are available in some units. This direct, repeated language supports a high confidence inclusion.
Multiple listings mention city or city-distance views with phrases like "city and ocean views", "views of the city", and "city views in the distance", indicating some units offer city views. Evidence is explicit across several agent remarks and aligns with prior medium confidence.
Several listings explicitly reference "coastline" or "coastal views" (e.g., "unbeatable view of the coastline", "coastal views"), demonstrating that some units offer coastline outlooks. The repeated explicit mentions across agent remarks provide reasonably strong evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
A handful of listings explicitly reference sunrise or morning sun (e.g., "take in the sun rise", "enjoy the sun rise", "sun rise from this private setting"), indicating some units provide sunrise exposure. Evidence is moderate and consistent with prior medium confidence.
Multiple current public remarks (at least ~15 listings in this corpus) explicitly reference sunsets or sunset views—quotes include "toast sunsets with jaw-dropping ocean and mountain views," "enjoy sunset skies," and "spectacular nightly sunsets." Historical data also indicated high confidence for sunset views, and the repeated sunset mentions across many different listings/agents indicate the building offers sunset views despite the MLS checkbox field showing none.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox shows RESMAN on 4 of 20 recent listings, but none of the supplied public remarks (~70+) contain phrases like "resident manager", "on-site manager", or "live-in manager." Evidence for a resident manager is weak and appears limited to some agents checking the MLS amenity box; further owner/property-manager verification or remarks explicitly mentioning an on-site manager would be needed to raise confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.