Westview at Makakilo Hts
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Westview at Makakilo Hts
Building Overview
Westview at Makakilo Hts in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale; built 1994 with concrete/wood construction and ocean, mountain and Diamond Head views.
About Westview at Makakilo Hts
Westview at Makakilo Hts is a condominium community located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood. According to available records, the property was built in 1994 and is constructed of concrete and wood frame. Size and unit count information is not provided in the MLS data.
Key features noted in MLS records include ocean, mountain, Diamond Head and sunset views. Units rely on window air conditioning. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed according to the provided data. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS information.
Parking is described as available with assigned stalls and guest parking. No monthly maintenance fee, association fee or other financial details are provided in the MLS excerpt. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all specifics, including management, fees, and unit dimensions, with the listing agent or association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for numeric owner-occupancy statements such as "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or similar wording, but none were stated. Some listings mention owner-occupants or investors as potential buyers, which is not the same as a unit-occupancy percentage. The actual owner-occupancy rate remains unknown from these remarks.
The public remarks strongly suggest a walk-up townhouse community rather than an elevator-served building. I searched for explicit elevator mentions such as "elevator," "multiple elevators," or a stated count and found none. The repeated references to stairs and second-floor access support keeping the building at 0 elevators.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
14 of 20 recent MLS listings mark OTCOEX as included, suggesting common-area electricity is usually covered at the building level. The remarks across the listings are largely silent on this item and appear to be standard copy-paste property descriptions, so the evidence is implied rather than explicit.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Recent MLS data strongly points away from hot-water inclusion: 0 of 20 listings have HOTWAT while 17 of 20 list WTRHTR. Several public remarks reference unit water heaters, including phrases like "new water heater" and "brand new water heater," which is consistent with hot water being provided in-unit rather than through HOA fees. This is strong cross-listing evidence and not just a copy-paste checkbox artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
18 of 20 recent MLS listings include sewer in association fee inclusions, which is strong MLS-level evidence. At least one remark explicitly says "Water, sewer, and trash included in association fees," confirming the checkbox data rather than suggesting a change.
18 of 20 recent MLS listings indicate water is included in the association fee, and the remarks directly support that with phrases such as "Water, sewer, and trash included in association fees." The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and appears reliable rather than a one-off agent copy-paste.
There is no clear evidence of a common BBQ facility in the building. A few listings mention phrases like 'grilling on the deck' and 'plenty of room for BBQs,' but those appear tied to private yards/lanai spaces rather than a shared amenity. With only 1/20 current MLS listings checking BBQ and no consistent public-remarks confirmation, this does not look reliable as a building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
6 of 20 current MLS listings include the CRWSH amenity checkbox, but 0 of the provided public remarks mention 'car wash', 'auto wash', or similar. The checkbox usage is inconsistent across listings and may reflect agent copy/paste; there is implied building-level car wash presence from MLS fields but no explicit corroborating remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across many current listings confirms building-level outdoor spaces: multiple remarks reference 'private covered lanai', 'covered lanai', 'private patio and deck', 'private fenced yard' and similar phrases. This appears consistently across different agent remarks (not isolated to a single copy/paste) and aligns with prior MLS checkbox data indicating patios/decks.
Public remarks do not mention an on-site jogging or walking path; 0 of the remarks describe a 'jogging path', 'walking path', or similar, while 3/20 MLS records have the WAJOPA checkbox checked. The checkbox entries likely reflect agent copy/paste rather than a true shared building jogging path, so the feature is omitted.
No analysis available
Many current listing remarks (25+ separate listing remarks) explicitly advertise private outdoor spaces using phrases like “private yard,” “private fenced yard,” “private backyard,” and “enclosed yard.” This aligns with prior MLS indications (PRIYAR present in historical data) and appears across multiple agents and listings rather than isolated copy/paste, giving strong evidence the building offers private yard units (especially ground-floor units).
No analysis available
I found no explicit mention of a building recreation area, recreation deck, or amenity/recreation space in the public remarks. A few listings reference a 'community playground' or nearby outdoor spaces, but that is not the same as a dedicated building rec area. Since only 2/20 current MLS listings show RECARE and the remarks remain silent on the amenity, the evidence does not support this as a building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building offers storage: current MLS amenities include storage in 5 of 20 listings and unit_features in 3 of 20, and at least 5–7 agent remarks explicitly reference storage (examples: "Spacious balcony has storage too," "dedicated exterior storage area," "Spacious storage in the attic," and "massive pantry—perfect for all your storage needs"). Mentions appear across multiple agent remarks rather than being a single copy/paste, supporting a high confidence that the building provides storage/lockers or additional storage spaces.
No analysis available
None of the public remarks reference a tennis court, tennis facilities, or any related amenity. With only 1/20 current MLS listings showing TENCOU and no corroborating remarks across the set, this feature is not supported by the evidence provided.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence confirms in-unit laundry for this building. Multiple current listings explicitly mention it, and the historical MLS data shows 20/20 listings including washer/dryer, suggesting this is a reliable building feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly. Quotes include "in-unit washer and dryer," "washer and dryer are conveniently located in the unit," and "full-size washer and dryer in the unit."
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly present across the building. All 20 current MLS records include parking flags, and the remarks repeatedly mention features like "two assigned parking stalls," "2 parking spaces," "one covered and one open," and "2 parking stalls both covered." The evidence is consistent across many listings and appears to reflect a real shared building feature rather than agent copy-paste noise.
Assigned parking is strongly supported by both the MLS flags and the remarks. At least 16 of 20 current records include ASSIGN, and multiple listings specifically describe "two assigned parking stalls," "designated parking spots," or "assigned stalls included."
Moderate evidence that covered parking is available for at least some units: 6 of 20 MLS records show covered flags and many remarks mention covered stalls (e.g., 'one covered and one open', 'both COVERED!'), implying covered parking exists but not for all units.
I looked for explicit deeded/owned parking language such as deeded stall, parking included in deed, or owned parking. The listings consistently describe assigned stalls, which indicates parking is not explicitly deeded in the public remarks.
No analysis available
I looked for references to monthly parking charges, stall rental fees, additional parking cost, or parking being excluded from the sale, and found no specific dollar amount. The remarks consistently mention assigned parking stalls, covered/open stalls, or guest parking, but not a separate parking fee.
Guest parking appears to be a standard feature of the building. Eighteen of 20 current MLS records include the GUEST flag, and many remarks explicitly say "ample guest parking," "guest parking available," or mention guest stalls near the unit. The consistency across multiple listings supports this as a true building amenity rather than a checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist or needing to join a list for stalls. The remarks suggest parking is readily assigned and available, with no indication of a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is clearly present in this building and is repeatedly confirmed across many current listings. Multiple remarks explicitly mention window AC units in different units and contexts, including new 2026 installation, bedrooms, living room, and main bedrooms, which strongly supports this as a building-level feature available in some units. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a single copy-paste remark.
7 of 20 current MLS entries list CONCRE (concrete) in construction_materials. Public remarks contain only sparse, indirect mentions (one remark: "easy to maintain concrete flooring") and no agents explicitly describe a concrete building or reinforced concrete structure. Evidence is mixed — several MLS records indicate concrete construction but the listing text does not consistently confirm it, so include the feature with moderate confidence.
This is supported by 18 of 20 current MLS listings, which is overwhelming building-level evidence. The public remarks do not mention construction, but the near-universal MLS checkbox pattern strongly indicates double-wall construction for the building.
No analysis available
MLS checkbox evidence appears in 6 of 20 current listings, while the remarks are silent on construction materials. This suggests the feature is present in MLS data but not actively described by agents, so it may reflect copy/paste behavior rather than remarked-on detail.
No analysis available
Eight of 20 current listings list SLAB, but the public remarks contain no explicit foundation references. The evidence is moderate and mostly MLS-driven, which is common when agents reuse checkbox data without narrative confirmation.
No analysis available
Wood-frame construction is supported by current MLS data rather than by the public remarks: 8 of 20 listings have WOOFRA checked. None of the remarks explicitly describe wood-frame construction or a recent structural change, so this looks more like a consistent MLS attribute than agent copy explaining it. Because the feature appears in multiple listings without contradiction, it should remain included.
Only 7 of 20 current listings have ABOGRO checked, and the remarks do not explicitly describe above-ground construction. This looks like moderate MLS-only evidence, possibly from agent-entered building data rather than narrative descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit indicators such as STR permitted, legal vacation rental, NUC/TVU, 30-day minimum, or owner-occupant-only language and found none. Since there is no evidence in the public remarks that short-term rentals are allowed, the feature is treated as not allowed based on the available information.
I looked for hotel rental pool references such as Hilton, Ritz, Trump, or any managed hotel program. None appear in the remarks, and since STR is not indicated, this must be false.
I searched for phrases like mandatory hotel pool, required participation, or cannot opt out. There is no evidence of any mandatory rental program in the public remarks, so this is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for terms like lease expires, ground lease, leasehold, renewal, or any stated expiration year and found nothing. The listings do mention fee simple in one case, which suggests land tenure is not leasehold in the remarks provided, but no lease expiry date is given.
Public remarks repeatedly advertise VA assumable financing across many units, which is strong evidence the building is VA loan approved. I found several explicit references to VA loan assumption and VA financing, not just a single mention.
I checked the remarks for insurance-related wording such as fully insured, fully covered, walls-in coverage, or comprehensive building insurance and found no explicit mention. Because the listings do not address insurance coverage directly, this cannot be confirmed from public remarks. Confidence remains low due to lack of evidence.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for fire/life safety language including FLSE, fire inspection passed, life safety compliant, and fire safety certified, but found nothing. With no explicit statement in the listings, this feature remains unverified from public remarks. Confidence is low because absence of evidence is not the same as evidence of absence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are strongly supported across the listings, with well over 20 remarks explicitly mentioning them. Common phrases include "peekaboo ocean view," "sweeping ocean views," "ocean and mountain views," and "coastline views," often tied to lanai or bedroom views. The consistency across many listings suggests this is a real building-level feature rather than copy-paste noise.
Multiple listings explicitly state mountain/hillside/mauka views (e.g., "mountain views", "hillside views", "mauka to makai"), appearing across numerous agent remarks. The evidence is consistent with prior high historical confidence that some units offer mountain views.
Several listings (multiple agent remarks) explicitly reference "Diamond Head" or "Diamond Head view" and phrases like "postcard-worthy views of the iconic Diamond Head", indicating Diamond Head views are available in some units. This direct, repeated language supports a high confidence inclusion.
Multiple listings mention city or city-distance views with phrases like "city and ocean views", "views of the city", and "city views in the distance", indicating some units offer city views. Evidence is explicit across several agent remarks and aligns with prior medium confidence.
Several listings explicitly reference "coastline" or "coastal views" (e.g., "unbeatable view of the coastline", "coastal views"), demonstrating that some units offer coastline outlooks. The repeated explicit mentions across agent remarks provide reasonably strong evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
A handful of listings explicitly reference sunrise or morning sun (e.g., "take in the sun rise", "enjoy the sun rise", "sun rise from this private setting"), indicating some units provide sunrise exposure. Evidence is moderate and consistent with prior medium confidence.
Multiple current public remarks (at least ~15 listings in this corpus) explicitly reference sunsets or sunset views—quotes include "toast sunsets with jaw-dropping ocean and mountain views," "enjoy sunset skies," and "spectacular nightly sunsets." Historical data also indicated high confidence for sunset views, and the repeated sunset mentions across many different listings/agents indicate the building offers sunset views despite the MLS checkbox field showing none.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox shows RESMAN on 4 of 20 recent listings, but none of the supplied public remarks (~70+) contain phrases like "resident manager", "on-site manager", or "live-in manager." Evidence for a resident manager is weak and appears limited to some agents checking the MLS amenity box; further owner/property-manager verification or remarks explicitly mentioning an on-site manager would be needed to raise confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.