West Loch Fairways
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
West Loch Fairways
Building Overview
West Loch Fairways in Ewa — wood frame construction with window air conditioning; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About West Loch Fairways
West Loch Fairways is a residential building located in the Ewa neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1992 and is wood frame construction. Unit size and total number of units are not specified in the MLS-derived data provided.
Key features recorded in the MLS include window air conditioning. The property does not permit pets and short-term rentals are not allowed, per the available data. No on-site amenities (such as pool or gym) are listed in the provided MLS information.
Parking is indicated as available and guest parking is noted. Management company information is unknown in the MLS extract supplied. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all building details, rules, and any applicable fees with the listing agent or management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Searched all remarks for numeric or descriptive owner-occupancy indicators. The listings do not provide any percentage or clear descriptor of owner vs. tenant occupancy, so the owner occupancy percentage is unknown from the public remarks.
Searched all public remarks for terms like 'elevator', '4 elevators', 'four elevators', or 'multiple elevators'. The remarks consistently describe split-level townhomes, parking stalls, courtyards and clubhouse/recreation room but contain no reference to elevators or lifts, so the number is unknown from the remarks.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly state the maintenance fee 'includes common area(s)' (e.g., 'includes water/sewer, common area, and cable' and 'includes water/sewer, common areas and TV cable'). This phrasing appears in at least 3–4 different agent remarks and aligns with MLS checkbox data (OTCOEX present in 12/20), indicating consistent building-level inclusion of common area electricity/expenses.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There are no remarks claiming 'hot water included' and many units list WTRHTR (water heater) rather than HOTWAT; CURRENT MLS has HOTWAT=0/20 and WTRHTR present in 17/20 entries. This strongly indicates hot water is not provided / included in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several agent remarks explicitly say the maintenance fee 'includes water/sewer' or 'includes water, sewer, internet and cable' (appearing in at least 3–4 listings), and MLS checkbox data lists SEWER for the majority of listings (17/20), indicating sewer is included in the HOA fees.
Agent remarks repeatedly note 'maintenance fee includes water' or 'includes water, sewer, internet and cable' (at least 3–4 listings), and MLS checkbox data lists WATER for 17/20 listings. The consistency across remarks and MLS data indicates water is included in the HOA/maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings' remarks mention a car wash or vehicle wash area, yet MLS shows only 3/20 with CRWSH—contradicted by numerous detailed amenity descriptions that omit any car wash. Given prior high-confidence absence and zero supporting remarks across the current listings, the building is marked as not having a car wash.
Multiple listings (MLS shows 12/20 with CLUHOU) explicitly mention shared clubhouse/rec room: quotes include 'access to a community clubhouse and recreation room', 'community recreation room / clubhouse', and 'dedicated club room close by'. Mentions appear across independent listings and agent remarks rather than a one-off copy/paste, providing strong confirmation the building offers a clubhouse/community room.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence across listings: at least 18 of the provided remarks explicitly reference outdoor spaces (phrases include "private lanai", "private patio", "private courtyard", "covered lanai" and "fenced in patio"). These descriptions appear in listings from multiple agents and match prior MLS checkbox data, supporting a high-confidence conclusion that the building offers patios/decks.
At least several listings (MLS 8/20 checked WAJOPA) explicitly reference on-site or adjacent walking/jogging paths: sample phrases include 'walking paths for jogging or pets', 'meandering walking/jogging paths', and 'lush walking paths for jogging or pets'. Multiple agent remarks independently describe these paths, supporting inclusion of the feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listings explicitly note extra/dedicated storage such as exterior storage closets off the lanai or courtyard (e.g., “its own dedicated storage,” “storage outside for all your beach things”), showing that at least some units provide additional storage space. Combined with MLS checkboxes for storage in both amenities and unit features across many listings, this indicates the building offers extra storage options as a typical feature rather than an isolated one-off.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that some units have in-unit laundry: multiple current remarks (at least ~8–12 listings) explicitly state "washer, dryer", "new washer & dryer", or "Samsung smart washer/dryer" (quotes: "washer, dryer and refrigerator", "brand-new washer, and dryer", "new washer & dryer"). Combined with prior MLS inclusion data (19/20), this provides high confidence that units in the building offer in-unit laundry rather than an isolated or erroneous checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Building-level parking is well-supported: 20/20 MLS listings include a parking type and numerous remarks reference parking for units (examples: 'Includes one assigned parking stall', '2 side-by-side parking stalls', '2 parking stalls'). Evidence is consistent across multiple agents/listings and aligns with historical MLS checkbox data, giving very high confidence that the building offers parking.
Assigned parking is strongly supported: a majority of MLS entries (16/20) show ASSIGN and many remarks explicitly mention 'assigned', 'designated', or 'two assigned parking stalls'. The evidence is consistent across listings (not isolated), indicating the building provides assigned/reserved parking for units.
No analysis available
Listings repeatedly mention assigned/designated or side-by-side parking stalls (e.g., "Includes one assigned parking stall", "2 assigned parking stalls"), but there is no explicit language indicating parking is deeded. Determination of deeded status requires explicit mention, so marked false with low-medium confidence.
No analysis available
Searched for terms like 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', 'parking rental' or similar. None of the listings mention an extra parking fee, so the monthly parking fee is unknown.
Guest/visitor parking is directly mentioned in multiple listings with phrases like 'guest parking nearby' and 'ample visitor and street parking', and 12/20 MLS entries have GUEST checked. This recurring, differently worded evidence from several agents indicates that the complex provides dedicated guest parking areas.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched remarks for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list for parking', or related language. None were found, so a waitlist is unlikely based on available remarks, but confirmation is limited.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong historical evidence (ACWIUN checked in 17/20 listings) combined with multiple recent remarks that explicitly state "window AC in every room" and "window AC units in every room" support that some units in the building have window air conditioners. Remarks also reference split A/C in other units, indicating a mix of cooling types across listings; overall the evidence is consistent across multiple agents and matches the historical MLS checkbox usage.
Across 20 listings, just 4 mark concrete in construction materials, while most instead indicate wood-frame and double-wall construction. No public remarks mention concrete construction, reinforced concrete, or a concrete building, pointing to the project not being considered a concrete-built complex in MLS terms. The small minority of concrete checkmarks appears inconsistent and likely reflects checkbox misuse rather than actual structure type.
MLS construction checkbox shows double-wall (DOUWAL) in 17 of 20 current listings and was checked in 18 of 20 historically, indicating consistent reporting across multiple listings. None of the public remarks explicitly mention or deny 'double wall' construction, but the strong, repeated MLS checkbox presence across many agents suggests the building uses double-wall construction rather than isolated agent copy/paste errors.
No analysis available
Just one listing out of 20 marks masonry/stucco, and none of the public remarks reference masonry, stucco, or similar construction details. This isolated checkbox conflicts with the dominant wood-frame/double-wall pattern and appears to be a one-off data entry issue. Taken together, the evidence strongly indicates the building is not primarily classified as masonry/stucco construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
12 of 20 recent MLS entries list WOOFRA (wood frame) in construction materials, supporting the building-level wood-frame classification. None of the public remarks explicitly mention a different construction type or a recent structural change, and no agents' remarks describe a conversion away from wood-frame, though copy/paste is possible. Given the majority MLS checkbox presence but lack of explicit mention in remarks, wood-frame is likely but not confirmed by unit-level narrative details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched all remarks for explicit language permitting transient/short-term rentals or branded transient unit codes. There is no evidence in the remarks that STRs are allowed; therefore STR allowed is marked false with medium confidence.
Searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', or branded hotel management references. None were found and STRs do not appear permitted, so hotel pool participation is false.
Searched for phrases like 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or 'must be in rental program' and found none. With no evidence of STR or hotel pool, mandatory participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched remarks for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to [year]', 'leasehold', or explicit four-digit expiry years. No leasehold language or expiry year is present, so the lease expiry year is unknown.
Public remarks explicitly reference assumable VA loans in multiple listings, indicating the project accepts VA financing. This is direct evidence from the remarks, so confidence is high.
Searched for explicit phrases like 'fully insured', 'walls-in coverage', or 'full insurance'. The remarks instead mention a special assessment related to insurance (to be paid by seller), which does not confirm comprehensive HOA 'walls-in' coverage; therefore we cannot mark the building as fully insured based on the public remarks.
No analysis available
Reviewed remarks for explicit statements such as 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE passed', or 'passed fire inspection'. There are no such statements in the listings, so there is no evidence the building has passed an FLSE; absence of mention likely indicates it was not reported in public remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple unit remarks (approximately 12/20 listings) describe garden-like or landscaped views—phrases include "lush, park-like setting," "private courtyard," "private patio/lanai," and "landscaping and grounds are expertly kept." This confirms prior high-confidence MLS data indicating the building offers garden/courtyard views and suggests the feature is broadly present rather than an isolated or copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0/20) mention 'sunset' or western exposure; public remarks reference 'sunrise view' and 'views of West Loch and Pearl Harbor' but contain no phrases like 'sunset view', 'evening sun', or 'western exposure'. With MLS view_descriptions showing 0 SUNSET entries and no remarks supporting sunset views across multiple agents, there is strong evidence the building does not advertise sunset views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Historical MLS data showed the building had been recorded with a resident/on-site manager (previously high confidence). In the current set of public remarks none explicitly mention a resident or on-site manager and only a small number of listings have the RESMAN checkbox checked (3 of 20), suggesting inconsistent agent reporting; not enough clear, widespread contrary evidence to change the feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.