
West Loch Fairways
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
West Loch Fairways
Building Overview
West Loch Fairways in Ewa — wood frame construction with window air conditioning; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.

About West Loch Fairways
West Loch Fairways is a residential building located in the Ewa neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1992 and is wood frame construction. Unit size and total number of units are not specified in the MLS-derived data provided.
Key features recorded in the MLS include window air conditioning. The property does not permit pets and short-term rentals are not allowed, per the available data. No on-site amenities (such as pool or gym) are listed in the provided MLS information.
Parking is indicated as available and guest parking is noted. Management company information is unknown in the MLS extract supplied. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all building details, rules, and any applicable fees with the listing agent or management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
County records report 2 floors, and listing floor fields reach 2. No penthouse or unit-number evidence contradicts this.
The county assessor reports 136 reconciled residential units, with matching residential CPR and dwelling totals; the parcel contains one building, so no multi-building adjustment is needed. No state registration or MLS unit total is available for corroboration.
Searched for numeric owner-occupancy percentages and descriptive terms such as "owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," and "highly owner occupied." No percentage or clear owner-occupancy descriptor was provided, so the value is unknown.
Searched the remarks for elevator-related terms including "elevator," "4 elevators," "four elevators," and "multiple elevators." No explicit elevator count or description was found, so the number is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
At least three remarks explicitly say the fee includes cable, including “water/sewer, common area, and cable” and “water, sewer, internet and cable.” The current MLS data also shows CABTV in 5/20 listings, providing consistent building-level evidence.
Multiple listings explicitly state the maintenance fee 'includes common area(s)' (e.g., 'includes water/sewer, common area, and cable' and 'includes water/sewer, common areas and TV cable'). This phrasing appears in at least 3–4 different agent remarks and aligns with MLS checkbox data (OTCOEX present in 12/20), indicating consistent building-level inclusion of common area electricity/expenses.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks mention included hot water, while the MLS data has HOTWAT in 0/20 listings and WTRHTR in 16/20. This strongly indicates units use individual water heaters rather than building-supplied hot water included in the fee.
One listing clearly states “Maintenance fee includes water, sewer, internet and cable,” while current MLS data marks INTSER in 2/20 listings. Although fewer listings mention it than water or sewer, the explicit building-level wording supports inclusion.
No analysis available
Several remarks explicitly state “maintenance fees of $604 includes water/sewer” or “maintenance fee includes water, sewer, internet and cable.” The feature is also marked in 16/20 current listings, with strong agreement across sources.
Multiple listings say the maintenance fee includes water, including remarks pairing it with sewer, cable, and internet. Current MLS data marks WATER in 16/20 listings, strongly confirming this building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings' remarks mention a car wash or vehicle wash area, yet MLS shows only 3/20 with CRWSH—contradicted by numerous detailed amenity descriptions that omit any car wash. Given prior high-confidence absence and zero supporting remarks across the current listings, the building is marked as not having a car wash.
Multiple listings (MLS shows 12/20 with CLUHOU) explicitly mention shared clubhouse/rec room: quotes include 'access to a community clubhouse and recreation room', 'community recreation room / clubhouse', and 'dedicated club room close by'. Mentions appear across independent listings and agent remarks rather than a one-off copy/paste, providing strong confirmation the building offers a clubhouse/community room.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 18 listings explicitly mention an outdoor space, including "private lanai," "covered lanai," "large fenced in patio," "private patio," "private courtyard," and "ground-floor lanai." The evidence is strong and consistent across multiple listings and agents, confirming that patio/deck amenities are available in the building, although the specific type varies by unit.
At least 10 current remarks explicitly mention walking, jogging, or running paths, including 'walking paths for jogging or pets,' 'meandering walking/jogging paths,' and 'near jogging trails.' The repeated descriptions across multiple listings and the 7/20 current MLS amenity selections strongly support that the community offers a jogging/walking path.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is confirmed across multiple listings and data fields. At least three current remarks explicitly reference storage, including "its own dedicated storage" and "storage outside for all your beach things," while 6/20 listings show storage-related amenities and 8/20 show storage in unit features. The repeated specific remarks and historically high confidence indicate this is a legitimate building/unit offering rather than simple checkbox copying.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the building: at least 5 listings explicitly mention a washer and dryer, including “washer, dryer,” “new washer & dryer,” and “Samsung smart washer/dryer,” while 19/20 current MLS records include washer/dryer in inclusions. The evidence comes from multiple distinct listing descriptions and is consistent with the previously high-confidence determination.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is strongly supported across the building: 20/20 current MLS listings include a parking type, and numerous remarks mention parking such as “one-parking unit,” “2 side by side parking,” and “two full side-by-side parking stalls.” The evidence is repeated across many listings and agents, not limited to a single copied remark.
Assigned parking is strongly supported by both MLS and remarks: 15/20 listings contain ASSIGN, while multiple listings state “assigned parking stall,” “two assigned parking stalls,” “two designated parking spaces,” or “dedicated parking stalls.” The repeated descriptions across different unit listings indicate a building-level assigned parking offering rather than isolated or copied checkbox data.
No analysis available
The remarks consistently mention assigned, designated, side-by-side, or included parking stalls. However, assigned parking does not establish deeded ownership, and no explicit deeded-parking language was found.
No analysis available
The remarks mention assigned parking and ample street or guest parking but do not identify a separate parking charge. Based on the available remarks, no parking fee is evidenced.
Guest parking is supported by 9/20 current MLS listings and several explicit remarks. Key phrases include “two assigned parking stalls plus guest parking nearby,” “ample visitor and street parking,” and “ample guest parking nearby,” with confirmations appearing across multiple listings and agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings describe assigned parking stalls and available guest or street parking. No waitlist language was found in the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is strongly supported across the building: two current listings explicitly mention window AC in every room, including "new window AC in every room" and "window AC units in every room." This confirms the historical pattern of window AC availability and aligns with the current MLS data showing ACWIUN in 16 of 20 listings; the evidence appears across multiple remarks rather than relying solely on copied checkbox data.
Across 20 listings, just 4 mark concrete in construction materials, while most instead indicate wood-frame and double-wall construction. No public remarks mention concrete construction, reinforced concrete, or a concrete building, pointing to the project not being considered a concrete-built complex in MLS terms. The small minority of concrete checkmarks appears inconsistent and likely reflects checkbox misuse rather than actual structure type.
Double-wall construction is supported by 17 of 20 current listings and 18 of 20 historical listings marking DOUWAL. The consistency across listings and strong historical confidence indicate this is a building-level feature, even though the remarks themselves do not use the phrase “double wall.”
No analysis available
Just one listing out of 20 marks masonry/stucco, and none of the public remarks reference masonry, stucco, or similar construction details. This isolated checkbox conflicts with the dominant wood-frame/double-wall pattern and appears to be a one-off data entry issue. Taken together, the evidence strongly indicates the building is not primarily classified as masonry/stucco construction.
No analysis available
Seven of 20 current listings identify SLAB in the MLS construction materials, but none of the supplied remarks mention a concrete slab or solid concrete foundation. Because the evidence is limited to a minority of checkbox entries and lacks supporting remarks or historical confirmation, the feature is omitted.
No analysis available
12 of 20 recent MLS entries list WOOFRA (wood frame) in construction materials, supporting the building-level wood-frame classification. None of the public remarks explicitly mention a different construction type or a recent structural change, and no agents' remarks describe a conversion away from wood-frame, though copy/paste is possible. Given the majority MLS checkbox presence but lack of explicit mention in remarks, wood-frame is likely but not confirmed by unit-level narrative details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks focus on residential ownership, community amenities, and assigned parking, with no evidence permitting short-term rentals. No explicit prohibition was found either, so this is based on absence of supporting STR language.
The listings contain no references to participation in a hotel rental program or hotel-managed operations. Because STR permission is not established, the hotel-pool feature must also be false.
The remarks do not mention any required hotel rental pool or rental-program obligation. Since STR permission is not established, mandatory hotel-pool participation cannot apply.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for leasehold language and specific expiration or renewal years. No applicable lease-expiry information was found, so the year is unknown.
Public remarks repeatedly provide assumable VA loan options, which is direct evidence that VA financing is available in the building. The repeated references across listings support very high confidence.
Searched for explicit phrases such as "fully insured," "full insurance," "comprehensive building insurance," and "walls-in coverage." The remarks only reference a special assessment for insurance coverage, including that it will be paid by the seller, which does not establish full HOA insurance.
No analysis available
Searched for references to a fire/life safety evaluation, FLSE passage, fire safety certification, life safety compliance, and passed fire inspection. None of these statements appear in the remarks, so there is no evidence to confirm this feature.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple unit remarks (approximately 12/20 listings) describe garden-like or landscaped views—phrases include "lush, park-like setting," "private courtyard," "private patio/lanai," and "landscaping and grounds are expertly kept." This confirms prior high-confidence MLS data indicating the building offers garden/courtyard views and suggests the feature is broadly present rather than an isolated or copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 20 listings mention sunset views, evening sun, western exposure, or Friday night fireworks. Remarks that describe views refer to a “sunrise view” and “views of West Loch and Pearl Harbor,” so the absence is consistent across listings rather than a single agent’s omission.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Historical MLS data showed the building had been recorded with a resident/on-site manager (previously high confidence). In the current set of public remarks none explicitly mention a resident or on-site manager and only a small number of listings have the RESMAN checkbox checked (3 of 20), suggesting inconsistent agent reporting; not enough clear, widespread contrary evidence to change the feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.