Walina Apartments

Five of six MLS entries show the building as built in 1971, while one lists 1965. With no contradictory remarks, 1971 is adopted as the construction year based on the strong majority of MLS records.

Across 6 listings, the highest observed unit floor is 11 and one unit is described as a penthouse, strongly suggesting an 11-story building. Multiple remarks note 'only 4 units per floor' and 'a total of 42 units', which aligns with an ~11-floor configuration. One remark states '5-story building', but this conflicts with MLS floor data and the unit count, so it is treated as an outlier.

At least one listing clearly states there are 'a total of 42 units' in Walina Apartments. Other listings repeat that there are 'only 4 units per floor', which is broadly consistent with this total. No remarks or data indicate a different unit count.

There are no explicit remarks like '41% owner occupied' or 'majority owner occupied' to confirm or update owner-occupancy. Per rules, when a current numeric value exists and remarks do not address it, the existing value is kept with low confidence and noted as having no corroborating evidence in the public remarks.

Remarks explicitly state there is one elevator in the building, which directly confirms the elevator count. This matches building context (5-story mention in remarks; overall building floors in context is 11 but the remark specifically references a 5-story building), so high confidence in the count as reported in the remarks.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Association_fee_includes never shows central AC, and remarks focus on other upgrades (tankless water heater, electric panel, etc.) without any reference to central air being provided. This strongly indicates central AC is not included in the fees.

Across 6 listings, association_fee_includes never lists cable (CABTV) and no agent remarks mention cable being part of the HOA. This indicates cable TV is not a building-paid service included in the fees.

OTCOEX appears in 4 of 7 current listings' association_fee_includes and historical confidence was High. No remarks explicitly mention common-area electric, but multiple agents consistently checked OTCOEX across units, indicating building common-area electricity is included.

All descriptions refer to condos and fee simple ownership with no reference to cooperative structure or co-op taxes. Association_fee_includes never shows COOTAX, so cooperative taxes are not part of the maintenance fee.

The MLS data never lists electricity as included and agents highlight features like “up to code electric panel and wiring,” typical for units paying their own power. This strongly indicates unit electricity is not included in the maintenance fees.

Association_fee_includes never shows gas, and kitchen description mentions an electric range rather than gas. This strongly supports that gas service is not included in the maintenance fees (and may not be present at all).

No listings list HOTWAT in association_fee_includes (0 of 7) and 3 listings list WTRHTR; multiple remarks explicitly state 'tankless water heater' and describe unit-level hot water systems. This strongly indicates hot water is not a building-included fee.

Association_fee_includes never lists internet, and marketing remarks omit any reference to building-provided internet or Wi-Fi. This suggests residents obtain and pay for their own internet service rather than it being included in HOA fees.

All remarks focus on proximity to Waikiki Beach, International Market Place, and a grocery store, with no reference to any marina facilities. Combined with MARINA never being selected in MLS, marina fees or access are not included in the maintenance.

SEWER appears in 6 of 7 current listings' association_fee_includes and historical confidence was High. Remarks do not contradict; multiple agents consistently include sewer in HOA fees, supporting that sewer is included in maintenance.

WATER is listed in 6 of 7 current listings' association_fee_includes with prior High confidence. No public remarks dispute this, and multiple agents consistently checked the water-included box, indicating water is included in the HOA fees.

None of the 6 remarks mention BBQ facilities, grills, or a barbecue area, which would normally be highlighted if present. Given that 5/6 MLS entries do not check BBQ and there is no textual support, the building likely does not have a shared BBQ amenity.

0 of 6 listings mention bike storage or related facilities, and MLS amenities do not show bike storage checked. Agents highlight location, security, pet policy, parking, and in-unit features but provide no indication of any bicycle storage amenity in the building.

The building is promoted as being 2–2.5 blocks from Waikiki Beach, not as a waterfront or marina property. With no MLS or remark evidence of docks or slips, it is almost certain there is no boat dock or marina access.

Although covered and assigned parking is mentioned, there is no reference to a car wash facility in any listing. With all MLS records leaving the car wash amenity unchecked, it is very likely this building does not have a car wash area.

No listing describes a clubhouse or community center, which would typically be a selling point if present. With all MLS entries omitting this amenity, it is very likely there is no clubhouse in this building.

Listings describe Walina Apartments as a "boutique" and "secure" building but do not mention any concierge or staffed front desk. This consistent omission and MLS data make it very likely there is no concierge service in the building.

The building is clearly advertised as pet-friendly, but agents never reference a dedicated dog park or pet exercise area. Given the absence of MLS checkmarks for a dog park, it appears there is no formal dog park amenity.

Marketing remarks emphasize location, renovations, pet-friendliness, and parking, but never mention a doorman or lobby attendant. The consistent absence of this high-profile amenity in both remarks and MLS strongly indicates there is no doorman service.

Across all 6 listings, there is no reference to a gym, fitness room, or fitness center, and agents do not market any exercise-related amenity. With 0/6 MLS amenity checkboxes marked for an exercise room, it is very likely this building does not offer one.

Across all listings, there is no mention of limousine or courtesy car services. Given the complete absence of any MLS or textual evidence, the building almost certainly does not offer limo service.

Agents do not advertise any meeting or conference facilities in the building across all 6 listings. Combined with blank MLS checkboxes for this amenity, this supports that the building does not offer a meeting room.

2 of 6 listings explicitly mention lanais ('expansive wrap around lanai', 'outdoor lanai') in different units, showing that the building offers lanai/patio-style outdoor spaces in at least some condos. Even though agents did not check a patio/deck amenity box in MLS, the remarks confirm this feature is available to some buyers in the building.

Listings emphasize proximity to Waikiki attractions but do not mention any dedicated jogging or walking paths on the property. With 0/6 MLS checks for this amenity, the building likely does not offer a formal jogging path.

Across all listings, there is no mention of any children's playground or play structure, which would be a key marketing point for families. With all MLS records leaving this amenity unchecked, it is very likely that the building does not have a playground.

0 of 6 listings reference any private or fenced yard, and the building is described as a small 5-story Waikiki condo with lanais rather than ground-level yard spaces. Given the urban context and consistent lack of yard-related remarks, it is very likely the building does not offer private yards for units.

None of the remarks mention a putting green or golf-related amenity, and the MLS never indicates one. This strongly supports that there is no putting green at this property.

The remarks focus on location, security, and unit upgrades, but never reference a recreation deck or shared recreation area. Together with 0/6 MLS checks for this amenity, this suggests the building lacks a formal recreation area.

Across 6 sets of remarks, agents do not mention any recreation room or game room in the building. With all MLS records leaving the rec room amenity unchecked, it is very likely this building does not have a recreation room.

Agents market the convenience of nearby dining and Waikiki Market but never claim there is an on-site restaurant. Combined with MLS omitting any restaurant amenity, this indicates there is no building restaurant.

None of the remarks mention rooftop access, a roof deck, or rooftop amenities, even in the penthouse description where such a feature would be highlighted. With 0/6 MLS indications, it is very likely there is no common rooftop amenity.

No listing references sauna or steam facilities, which are typically highlighted when present. Given the lack of MLS indication and textual mention, the building likely does not have a sauna.

0 of 6 listings mention any kind of storage unit, locker, or extra storage, and storage-related MLS checkboxes are consistently left blank. Remarks focus on parking, pet-friendliness, and in-unit washer/dryers but never reference building or unit storage, suggesting dedicated storage units are not available.

None of the listings reference dedicated surfboard or board storage areas in the building, nor do they mention combined bike and surfboard storage rooms. Given this absence across multiple detailed descriptions, it is moderately likely the building does not offer specific surfboard storage facilities, but this cannot be confirmed with absolute certainty from remarks alone.

None of the listings reference a tennis court or tennis facilities, and all MLS amenity checkboxes for tennis are off. Combined with the small, in-town nature of the building, this strongly indicates there is no tennis court.

Most MLS entries mark a trash/garbage chute (6 of 7 recent listings show the TRACHU amenity). None of the public remarks explicitly state 'trash chute' or 'garbage chute', but the strong, consistent checklist presence across multiple agents/listings supports including the feature as part of the building amenities.

Parking is consistently described as 'dedicated covered parking', 'one assigned parking space', or 'secured covered parking', with no references to valet across any listing. Combined with the building being a 5-story boutique condo and MLS not indicating valet, this strongly supports that valet service is not offered.

At least one agent describes the building as having "secured covered parking," which typically indicates a gated or walled parking area providing perimeter security for vehicles. While not broadly emphasized across all listings, this language is a strong hint that some portion of the property, particularly the parking, is physically secured by a gate or similar barrier.

Agents never mention a hot tub or spa facility, and this small building is not marketed as having resort-style water amenities. With all MLS checkboxes for whirlpool off, it is very likely there is no whirlpool.

Across six listings, no remarks mention a pool, lap pool, or any shared swimming amenity, and only one listing shows a pool-related amenity checkbox while the others do not. Given the strong marketing focus on lifestyle features in Waikiki and the complete absence of textual references to a pool, the evidence strongly indicates this building does not have a shared pool.

None of the six listings reference a heated pool or warm swimming facility in remarks or in MLS pool_features. Since there is no credible evidence of even a standard pool, it is effectively certain that the building does not have a heated pool.

The public remarks for multiple listings in this building do not reference any pool, including a saltwater or saline pool. I specifically searched for terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater pool', 'salt pool', and 'saline pool' and found no matches, so it is likely the building does not have a saltwater pool.

At least three separate listing remarks explicitly state units have in-unit laundry (e.g., 'new in-unit washer and dryer', 'convenient in-unit washer and dryer', 'full size washer & dryer'). Current MLS checkbox data also indicated 4 of 7 listings include washer/dryer. Multiple agents reference the feature, so evidence is strong that some units in the building offer in-unit laundry.

Across six listings, there are no references to a shared or community laundry room, coin laundry, or laundry facilities in the building, even when other amenities are described in detail. Only one MLS entry checks the community-laundry box and it is unsupported by remarks, suggesting a likely agent checkbox error. Evidence points to the building not offering a distinct community laundry facility beyond in-unit options.

The remarks only discuss in-unit laundry and never mention community laundry or any payment systems such as coin-op, card-op, or paid machines. Searched for terms like 'coin laundry', 'laundry fee', 'card operated', and found no matches, so paid community laundry is assumed not to exist based on current information.

Listings mention in-unit washers and dryers but do not reference any shared laundry rooms or laundry facilities on each floor. Searched for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and similar language and found none. In the absence of any indications in remarks, this feature is assumed not to be present.

All recent listings indicate some form of parking, and several remarks explicitly mention a parking stall being included. One listing notes that not every unit has parking, but confirms that the building does provide stalls for some units. Buyers searching for buildings with on-site parking would reasonably consider this property.

Multiple listings explicitly describe the included stall as 'assigned,' 'dedicated,' or 'designated,' and MLS checkboxes largely agree. While not every unit has a stall, those that do appear to have a specifically assigned space rather than unassigned open parking.

Multiple listing remarks explicitly state covered parking: examples include "1 covered, assigned parking stall", "1 dedicated covered parking space", and "secured covered parking". Historical MLS parking_features also flagged covered/garage for the majority of listings (5/7), so evidence is strong and consistent across agents that the building offers covered parking.

Multiple remarks describe assigned/dedicated/covered parking stalls, but none explicitly state parking is deeded or included in the deed. Searched for 'deeded parking', 'owned parking', and similar phrases; not found.

Across all reviewed listings there is no mention of EV charging, and the specific MLS checkbox for EV stations is never used. Given how prominently such a feature is usually marketed, this strongly suggests the building does not offer EV charging at this time.

Searched remarks for terms like 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', or dollar amounts for parking; nothing found. therefore monthly parking fee is unknown from the remarks.

Agents note that not every unit even comes with a stall and do not mention any additional guest or visitor spaces. The consistent lack of MLS checkbox usage and remarks implies there is no dedicated guest parking area.

At least one listing explicitly markets 'secured covered parking,' and several MLS entries mark secured entry for parking. This points to gated or otherwise controlled-access parking being available in the building.

Listings that describe parking only mention a single standard space and never tandem arrangements. The complete absence of tandem mentions in both MLS data and remarks indicates the building does not offer tandem parking stalls.

The building is described as a small 'boutique' property in Waikiki with assigned or covered stalls but no staffed services. The consistent lack of any valet references strongly indicates there is no valet parking offered.

Searched for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list', and similar phrasing. Remarks note not every unit has parking but do not describe a waitlist system, so no evidence of a waitlist.

The elevator is mentioned only in the context of basic access ("no need to walk up"), with no wording indicating key/fob or restricted elevator controls. Combined with unchecked MLS elevator security fields, this strongly suggests there is no keyed/fob elevator system.

The remarks were reviewed for terms like key card access, fob access, card reader, or electronic access control but none were found. Generic references to a 'secure building' are not sufficient to confirm a card/fob system, so this feature is assumed not present.

No remarks reference a security guard or 24/7 security, despite multiple descriptions of the building as "secure." With 0/6 MLS listings checking a guard/security box and no explicit mention in marketing remarks, it is very likely there is no staffed security guard service.

The text was checked for explicit indications of a security patrol or roving security presence, but none were identified. In the absence of any such references, a security patrol service is assumed not to be provided.

Although several listings describe the building as "secure," there are no explicit references to security cameras or video monitoring. Given the consistent absence of such mentions and unchecked MLS security system fields, video surveillance is unlikely to be a building feature.

Across six recent listings for Walina Apartments, none check the MLS boxes for central air conditioning, and no remarks describe central AC or a building-wide HVAC system. The prevalence of window AC in MLS inclusions instead indicates cooling is provided by individual units, so central AC is very unlikely for this building.

None of the six listings mark split AC in the MLS or describe mini-split/ductless systems in the remarks, even where renovations are emphasized. Given that several listings instead list window AC as an inclusion, it is very likely that split AC is not a feature offered in this building.

Four of six recent MLS listings for Walina Apartments explicitly include window AC in the inclusions, and no remarks contradict this. This pattern across multiple units and agents indicates that the building offers units with window air conditioning.

All seven available MLS listings flag the building construction as 'CONCRE' (concrete), and historical data showed high confidence that the building is concrete. Public remarks do not contradict this and there is consistent, building-level checkbox agreement across multiple listings, indicating strong evidence the building is concrete-constructed.

No listing references double-wall construction, and the building is consistently characterized as a concrete mid-rise condo. This makes double-wall framing highly unlikely as the primary construction method.

One agent marked hollow tile in MLS, but five did not and none of the six sets of remarks mention it. With inconsistent checkbox use and strong emphasis on concrete, there is insufficient evidence to treat hollow tile construction as a defining building feature.

Only a single listing flags masonry/stucco, with no supporting language in any public remarks. Given the inconsistent MLS data and lack of textual confirmation, masonry-stucco construction cannot be confidently affirmed as a distinct feature here.

None of the listings identify steel-frame construction, and all classify the building as concrete. In the absence of any textual or MLS evidence, primary steel-frame construction is unlikely for this 5-story concrete condo.

No MLS record or remark explicitly identifies a concrete slab foundation. In the absence of any direct evidence, slab construction cannot be confirmed and is treated as not documented for this building.

No analysis available

No listing indicates wood-frame construction, and all indicate concrete. Given the 5-story elevator design typical of reinforced-concrete Waikiki condos, wood-frame construction can be safely ruled out as the primary structural system.

A single listing flags 'above ground' while the others do not and none of the remarks describe above-ground construction explicitly. The weak and inconsistent evidence does not support treating above-ground construction as a defined building attribute.

No MLS record or remark mentions brick or brick-and-mortar construction. The building is consistently described and classified as a concrete Waikiki condo, so brick construction is very unlikely.

There is no MLS or textual indication of single-wall construction, and the 5-story concrete elevator structure is not of the single-wall type. Single-wall construction can be confidently excluded for this building.

Remarks explicitly state a minimum 30-day rental period for the building, which indicates short-term rentals (transient/STR) are not allowed. This language directly precludes short-term rentals.

There is no reference to hotel-managed rental programs or hotel rental pools in the remarks. Because short-term rentals are expressly precluded, hotel rental pool participation cannot apply.

Remarks include no language about mandatory participation in any rental pool; additionally, STRs are not allowed, so mandatory hotel pool participation is not applicable.

At least one of the six listings is described as a 'Rare Fee Simple Top Floor unit,' confirming Fee Simple ownership exists in the building. The other listings do not specify tenure, and none mention leasehold, so we can confidently say the building offers Fee Simple units (1 of 6 explicitly noted FS; 5 of 6 unspecified).

None of the six listings describe any unit as leasehold or mention lease rent or lease expiration; instead, one listing is explicitly 'Fee Simple'. Given typical disclosure practices, this pattern suggests the building likely does not have leasehold units, but this is based on omission rather than direct statements, so confidence is moderate.

Remarks explicitly call the unit 'Fee Simple', which indicates fee simple ownership rather than a leasehold; no lease expiry year is provided in the remarks. Searched for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', and 'leasehold', but found none specifying a year.

Multiple listings explicitly advertise an assumable VA loan at 2.25%, indicating the project is VA-approved for financing. This is directly stated in the public remarks.

I searched the remarks for explicit insurance wording such as 'fully insured', 'walls-in coverage', or 'full insurance' and did not find it. Although the remarks note 'Building has 100% Hurricane coverage,' that wording does not constitute confirmation of HOA-provided full 'walls-in' insurance, so I did not mark insured_fully as true.

Across all six listings, there is no reference to fire sprinklers or a sprinkler system, and the MLS amenity for sprinklers is unchecked in every case. This consistent absence makes it likely that the building does not have a notable fire sprinkler system, though this is inferred rather than directly stated.

I searched the public remarks for phrases like 'FLSE passed', 'fire life safety evaluation', 'passed fire inspection', 'fire safety certified', and related wording and found none. Because there is no explicit statement that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation, the field is set to false with medium confidence (absence of mention likely indicates no public claim).

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

No remarks reference any ocean, water, or makai views despite multiple high-floor and penthouse listings. MLS view data also shows no OCEAN entries and some units marked with no view, so it is very likely the building does not provide recognizable ocean views.

Even high-floor and top-floor listings do not advertise mountain views, which would typically be a selling point if present. Combined with MLS view data showing no mountain view flags, this supports that the building does not offer notable mountain views.

Agents do not market Diamond Head views for this building, including for penthouse and high-floor units where such a view would be highlighted if available. MLS data likewise contains no Diamond Head view flags, indicating these views are not a feature of the building.

At least one current listing explicitly advertises 'panoramic city views in the heart of Waikiki,' and historical MLS summaries also identified city views (2 of 7 listings list CITY in view_descriptions). Evidence shows city views are available for some units (not necessarily all), supported by explicit agent remarks rather than being solely a checkbox copy/paste.

Although the building is a few blocks from Waikiki Beach, agents do not advertise any coastline outlooks. The lack of coastline view flags in MLS supports that coastline views are not a characteristic of this property.

Despite detailed descriptions of unit upgrades and location, no agent mentions garden or courtyard views. The MLS view data also lacks any garden-view flags, suggesting garden views are not a notable feature here.

Agents do not promote any golf course outlooks, which would normally be highlighted if present. MLS data similarly lacks any golf course view selections, indicating the building does not offer golf course views.

Listings emphasize proximity to Waikiki Beach and International Market Place but do not reference any harbor or marina outlooks. The absence of marina-related view flags in MLS supports that marina views are not a characteristic of this building.

Even for high-floor and penthouse units, agents do not market sunrise or morning-sun exposure. Combined with the absence of sunrise flags in MLS, this indicates sunrise views are not a recognized selling point for the building.

Sunset or fireworks views are not promoted in any of the detailed marketing remarks. MLS view data also lacks sunset selections, so the building is unlikely to offer notable sunset views as a feature.

Agents do not indicate that any units overlook a cemetery, which would typically be disclosed if relevant. MLS view data also omits any cemetery-related view flags, making it very likely that cemetery views are not present.

Searched for references to fireworks views (e.g., 'watch fireworks from lanai', 'fireworks view') and found none. In the absence of any mention, it's likely the building does not market a specific fireworks view.

No analysis available

At least 3 listings clearly call out that pets are allowed, including a direct statement that 'Walina Apartments is a secure, pet-friendly building'. With repeated, explicit mentions from different agents and no contradictory restrictions, pets are clearly permitted in this building.

The resident manager amenity is marked in 5 of 6 MLS listings for this building, with no remarks suggesting otherwise. This consistent pattern strongly supports that Walina Apartments has an on-site or resident manager.

The building is consistently marketed as a residential condo ('condo in the Walina Apartments') with normal ownership, not as a condotel or condo-hotel. While 30-day rentals are allowed, this alone does not indicate hotel-style operations, and the absence of any hotel-program language across all listings strongly supports that it is not a condotel.

The ownership is described using condominium terminology and specifically as 'Fee Simple', which is not how co-ops are typically marketed. With no references to co-op structure or shares in any remarks or MLS fields, the building is almost certainly not a cooperative.