
Waipuna
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Waipuna
Building Overview
Waipuna in Waikiki — 38-story concrete tower with ocean and Diamond Head views, pool and fitness center.

About Waipuna
Based on MLS data, Waipuna is a 38-floor, 406-unit residential building in the Hobron-Ena district of Waikiki. The building was constructed in 1971 of concrete and is served by six elevators.
According to available records, on-site amenities include a pool, fitness center, and BBQ area. The property lists a resident manager and security guard. Units report ocean, mountain, Diamond Head, and sunset views. Air conditioning types noted are split and window units.
Parking is available, covered, and assigned, with guest parking provided. Pets are allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The building is managed by Hawaiiana Management Company, Ltd. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify details and current policies with the management company or their agent.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I found a clear owner-occupancy reference in the remarks: "50+ owner occupancy." That closely matches the current value, so I retained 50 with high confidence.
Public remarks confirm the presence of elevators, including express/high-floor service. I did not find a specific elevator count in the remarks, so I retained the current value of 6 based on existing building context and no contrary evidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV inclusion is strongly supported by both the MLS pattern and a direct public remark. At least one listing explicitly states 'Internet and cable are included,' which aligns with the building-level MLS data and suggests this is a standard fee item rather than an agent one-off.
Common-area electricity is moderately supported at the building level, with 15 of 20 listings showing OTCOEX in the MLS. The public remarks do not explicitly mention hall/elevator/common power, so this appears to be MLS-pattern evidence rather than direct confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water inclusion is strongly supported by the MLS pattern and an explicit remark: one listing says fees include 'hot water, water, sewer, basic cable.' Across the listing set, the repeated inclusion makes this a reliable building-level feature.
Internet inclusion is supported by both the MLS and a clear remark. The explicit phrase 'Internet and cable are included' is strong confirmation, while the MLS pattern shows this is a recurring building-level inclusion.
No analysis available
Sewer is one of the strongest-confirmed fee items for this building. The MLS pattern is nearly universal, and a remark explicitly says maintenance fees include 'hot water, water, sewer, basic cable.'
Water inclusion is essentially universal across the listing set, with 20 of 20 MLS entries showing WATER. Public remarks also reinforce this directly, making it a very high-confidence building feature.
BBQ amenities are extremely well supported. Multiple remarks explicitly say “BBQ area,” “BBQs,” “barbecue area,” and “Gas BBQs,” showing broad agreement across many listings and agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Car wash facilities are directly referenced in several remarks, including exact phrases like 'car wash station' and 'car wash area.' While less universal than marquee amenities, the repeated explicit mentions and supporting MLS history are enough to confirm it. This appears to be a shared building amenity.
Evidence is a bit less frequent than for the other amenities, but there is explicit mention of "Club House" in current remarks. Given the shared community-space context, it is reasonable to include this as a true building feature.
No analysis available
Dog-pet amenities are clearly present in the building. The remarks frequently use 'dog park,' 'dog run,' 'pet-friendly,' and 'pet-run,' matching the MLS history that already shows this feature on many listings. Evidence is consistent and building-wide.
No analysis available
The building’s exercise room is strongly supported across the listing set. Current remarks mention “exercise room,” “fitness center,” “gym,” and “full work out room w machines” in many listings, indicating this is a consistent building amenity rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
Across dozens of listings that carefully list extensive amenities (pool, gym, courts, pond, car wash, etc.), no agent ever mentions limousine, house car, or courtesy car service—something that would normally be heavily marketed if present. With just a single MLS checkbox and zero textual support, limo/car service is very likely not a building feature.
Multiple listings reference meeting rooms or meeting/party rooms, suggesting a real shared amenity. The phrasing varies, but the feature is clearly present in the building.
Patio/deck amenities are strongly supported across the listings. Remarks repeatedly mention 'covered lanai,' 'private lanai,' 'large lanai,' 'panoramic lanai,' and one listing explicitly lists 'patio/deck' among building amenities. Evidence is consistent across many agents and appears to be a real building feature rather than copy-paste noise.
The building has a clear path/walking amenity. Multiple remarks describe a “walking path around the pond,” “Private Garden path walks,” “walking trail,” and “walking/jogging path,” which is strong evidence for this feature.
No analysis available
Private yard space is not supported by the listing remarks. The text repeatedly mentions shared gardens, pond walking paths, and lanais, but not private or fenced yards for units. With only 2/20 MLS records showing PRIYAR and no explicit corroboration in remarks, this appears to be an uncommon or likely incorrect amenity rather than a reliable building feature.
Putting green is one of the most consistently repeated amenities in the remarks. Listings refer to “putting green,” “golf putting green,” “golf practice area,” and “putting and driving golf area,” making this a very strong building feature.
The building clearly has shared recreation space. Remarks cite “recreation area,” “recreation deck with a party pavilion,” “patio/deck,” and similar amenity areas across multiple listings, suggesting strong building-level confirmation.
Direct wording varies, but several listings mention a “party room,” “meeting/party room,” or “meeting room,” which aligns with a shared recreation room amenity. The evidence is recurring enough across the listing set to support inclusion, even though the exact phrase “recreation room” is not always used.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sauna is very well supported across the listings. The remarks repeatedly mention “sauna,” “dry saunas,” and “men and women sauna,” indicating a reliable building-level amenity with broad confirmation.
Storage is strongly supported for Waipuna. Well over a dozen current listings mention it directly, with phrases like 'big, private storage locker,' 'assigned storage locker,' 'dedicated storage unit,' and 'extra storage' appearing across multiple agents. The evidence is consistent and repeated, suggesting this is a real building feature rather than copy-paste noise.
Several remarks directly advertise surfboard storage or surf racks, often alongside bike storage. This is clear evidence that the building provides surfboard storage facilities.
The building clearly offers tennis facilities, often described together with pickleball courts. Current remarks repeatedly reference 'tennis court' or 'tennis/pickleball court,' aligning with the strong historical MLS record. This is consistent building-level amenity evidence.
Trash chute appears to be a real building feature, though it is mentioned less often than marquee amenities. There is explicit remark evidence using the term “trash chute,” which aligns with the current MLS amenities history and supports inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly confirmed for Waipuna. Across the provided remarks, a large majority of listings explicitly reference it in many forms, including "pool," "swimming pool," "heated pool," and "newly renovated pool." The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and appears repeatedly rather than as a one-off copy-paste error.
Multiple separate listings explicitly advertise a heated pool (quotes include “heated pool,” “heated swimming pool,” and “heated swimming pool, sauna”). While only some MLS checkbox codes indicated HEAPOO, the consistent, repeated heated-pool mentions across many agent remarks and listings provide strong corroboration that the building’s pool is heated.
I searched for direct salt-water pool wording such as "saltwater pool," "salt pool," or "saline pool," but found none. The remarks only confirm that the building has a pool, sometimes heated, without indicating salt-water treatment.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported for Waipuna. Across the provided remarks, well over a dozen listings explicitly mention it, including phrases such as "in-unit washer/dryer," "W/D in the unit," "brand-new washer and dryer," and "stack washer dryer." The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, so this feature should be included.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit paid-laundry language such as coin-op, card-operated, quarters, or laundry fee, and found no such references. The listings discuss in-unit washers/dryers and building amenities, but nothing that indicates community laundry requires payment.
I looked for phrases like "laundry on every floor," "laundry room on each floor," or similar floor-by-floor laundry references, but found none. The remarks mention in-unit washer/dryer in several listings, which does not confirm community laundry on every floor.
No analysis available
Assigned/reserved parking is very strongly supported across many listings, with repeated explicit remarks from multiple agents describing "assigned parking stall(s)", "dedicated parking", and even "deeded parking." The evidence appears consistent and not like a one-off checkbox error, so this feature should be included.
Covered parking is very strongly supported across the remarks, with well over a dozen listings explicitly mentioning covered stalls, covered garage parking, or assigned covered parking. The language is consistent across multiple agents and appears to be genuine building-level information rather than a copy-paste artifact.
The remarks provide explicit evidence that parking is deeded. I also checked for owned/included stall language, and the clearest evidence is the listing stating two deeded parking spaces.
No analysis available
I looked for parking fee, monthly parking charge, parking rental, or added parking cost language, but found no explicit fee for resident parking. Some remarks mention overnight visitor parking rates, but that is not a building parking fee for owners.
Guest parking is repeatedly confirmed in the remarks, including phrases like "ample guest parking," "guest parking for your visitors," and numbered guest stall counts. The feature appears across many separate listings and agents, making it reliable building-level information.
Secured parking/secured entry is less universally stated than covered or guest parking, but it is still supported by multiple remarks and the building’s repeated security emphasis. Several listings explicitly mention secured entry or secured parking in addition to 24/7 security, which suggests this is a real building feature rather than a checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist, parking waiting list, and join-waitlist language and found nothing. There is no public-remarks evidence that the building uses a parking waitlist system.
No analysis available
I looked for key card, fob, keycard, card reader, and electronic access wording. The remarks mention secured building, security guard, resident manager, and secured entry, but do not explicitly confirm a card/fob access system.
Security guard service is strongly supported at Waipuna. Dozens of current remarks explicitly mention building security, including phrases such as "24-hour security," "24/7 security," "security guard service," and "security patrol," and this appears consistently across multiple agents rather than a one-off mention. This aligns with the prior MLS data showing SECGUA in 16/20 listings, so the feature should remain included.
The listings repeatedly describe active security coverage, including patrol service and 24/7 security. That is strong direct evidence that the building has security patrol.
No analysis available
Multiple recent listings for this building explicitly mention split A/C or individual air conditioners and natural breezes, but there are no references to central air, central HVAC, or building-wide forced air systems. With only 1 of 20 MLS entries checking a central A/C-related box and no supporting remarks, the evidence strongly indicates Waipuna does not offer central air conditioning as a building-wide feature.
Confidence 96%: 4/20 MLS listings indicate ACSPL in inclusions, and remarks for multiple units mention 'split A/C systems in every room,' 'split A/C,' and 'all the new split AC units.'
Evidence suggests some units in Waipuna have window air conditioning, but it is not universal. One listing explicitly says '1 window AC,' and the MLS inclusion history shows ACWIUN appearing in about half of listings, though many remarks instead mention split or central AC and may reflect copy-paste inconsistencies. This supports including window_ac for the building, but with only moderate confidence.
Concrete construction is strongly supported at the building level. Historical MLS data shows 20/20 recent listings with CONCRE, and the current remarks consistently describe the same Waipuna building across many units without any contradiction. This appears to be a stable, building-wide feature rather than copy-paste noise.
Despite 6/20 MLS records marking DOUWAL, all listings consistently show CONCRE and describe a large, tower-style Waikiki condo, with no narrative references to double-wall or wood-framed construction. Given the incompatibility of double-wall framing with this concrete high-rise and the sporadic, agent-driven checkbox use, the double-wall designation is treated as an MLS error and the building is considered not double-wall constructed.
No analysis available
Only 4 of 20 recent MLS listings include construction_materials = 'MASSTU' (previously ~3/20). None of the many public remarks mention 'masonry' or 'stucco', so the signal is limited and inconsistent across agents, suggesting potential checkbox errors rather than an actual building-level masonry/stucco construction. Recommend verifying with owner/manager or building records.
No analysis available
Only 1 of 20 MLS entries includes SLAB (1/20) and none of the public remarks reference a "concrete slab" or slab foundation. This feature is included with low confidence because the only signal is a single MLS listing, which may reflect a unit-specific or agent-entered value rather than a building-wide documented foundation type.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Seven of 20 MLS entries mark ABOGRO (7/20). Public remarks focus on high floors, lanais, and views (consistent with above-ground structure) but do not explicitly state "above ground construction." Evidence is moderate and consistent with a high-rise condominium.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks strongly indicate short-term rentals are not allowed. The 90-day minimum rental language is consistent with a no-STR policy, so the building should be treated as not allowing short-term rentals.
Because short-term rentals are not allowed in the public remarks, a hotel rental pool cannot be supported from these listings. I also found no mention of hotel-managed rental programs, Hilton/Trump/Ritz-style pools, or similar arrangements.
There is no evidence of a mandatory rental-pool program in the remarks. I looked for required participation, cannot-opt-out language, or mandatory hotel pool references and found none, and the no-STR language further supports false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The leasehold expiration year is directly stated in the remarks. I searched for lease expiry, ground lease end, and extension language, and the clear year given is 2046.
The public remarks clearly indicate VA financing is accepted in this building. I found repeated explicit references to VA assumable loans/mortgages, which strongly supports VA loan approval or VA financing acceptance.
The listings repeatedly and directly confirm full building insurance / walls-in style coverage. This is strong, explicit evidence from multiple remarks, so confidence is very high.
No public remarks from many different agents mention fire sprinklers, sprinkler systems, or fire suppression despite very detailed amenity lists. FIRSPR appears in only 3/20 MLS amenity fields, which, lacking any remark support or historical indication, is likely a copy-paste/checkbox error rather than evidence of a building-wide sprinkler system.
I searched the remarks for fire/life safety evaluation language and found nothing relevant. Because this feature is only determined from public remarks and there is no current verified positive value, I am treating it as not evidenced in the listings.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are heavily and repeatedly supported across the listings, with far more than 20 mentions of phrases like "ocean view," "direct ocean view," "Pacific Ocean," and "panoramic ocean views." The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and unit types, so this is high-confidence building-level support.
Mountain views are clearly present in multiple remarks, including phrases like "mauka breezes," "mountains," and "ocean, mountain, and city skyline views." This appears across several listings and is not isolated to one agent, so the feature should remain true.
Diamond Head views are heavily and consistently supported across the remarks, with well over a dozen listings explicitly mentioning them. Phrases such as 'Diamond Head views,' 'view of Diamond Head,' 'DH view,' and 'facing DIAMOND HEAD' appear across multiple agents, suggesting this is a stable building-level view feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
City views are among the most consistently reported features in the building, with nearly every listing mentioning them. The remarks repeatedly reference 'city lights,' 'Waikiki skyline,' 'city view,' and 'city skyline,' indicating strong cross-listing support from many agents rather than isolated wording.
Coastline views are supported, but less consistently than the other view types. At least one listing explicitly says 'coastline,' and several others describe ocean/beach-facing panoramas that align with coastline exposure, so the building appears to offer some units with this feature.
Garden views are supported by multiple listings describing "lush gardens," "landscaped garden area," "tranquil garden," and similar phrases. The evidence appears across several different remarks and is strong enough to keep the feature true.
Confidence 88%: 0/20 MLS entries list GOLCOU; while one remark notes proximity to Ala Wai Golf Course, none mention 'golf course views' despite very detailed view descriptions.
Marina-type views are supported mainly through explicit canal/waterway references such as "Ala Wai Canal," "canal," and nearby harbor/waterfront descriptions. The remarks are sufficient to support this as a building-level view feature, though with slightly less breadth than ocean or city views.
Sunrise views are clearly supported by multiple listings, with explicit phrases such as "sunrise views," "Diamond Head sunrises," and "watching the sunrise." The evidence is direct and repeated, so this feature should be included.
Sunset views are repeatedly confirmed with phrases like "Ewa sunsets," "sunset skies," and "taking in the sunset." The repeated explicit references across listings make this a strong, reliable feature.
No analysis available
Multiple remarks directly say fireworks can be seen from the residence or lanai, which satisfies the view requirement. This is not just proximity to fireworks; it explicitly describes fireworks as part of the unit’s views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is strongly supported across the listing set: many remarks explicitly mention an "on-site resident manager," "on-site manager," or similar wording. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents and is reinforced by the current MLS amenity flag, so this feature should be treated as present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.