Wailana at Waikiki

MLS property data is highly consistent with 49 listings showing 1970 as the construction year and only 2 outliers at 1974. With no remarks suggesting another build year, 1970 is adopted as the building’s year built.

Remarks reference high floors and penthouses (e.g., 19th floor just below penthouse, 21st-level penthouse), and MLS unit data for this building includes units up to the 24th floor. In the absence of a stated 'X-story' count, we infer a 24-floor building from the maximum observed floor in MLS.

No listing remarks state how many units are in Wailana at Waikiki, and no trustworthy MLS unit-total data was provided. Because the building unit count is never specified, it cannot be reliably determined from the available information.

Remarks were reviewed for numeric percentages or clear owner-vs-renter descriptors and none were present. Per rules, do not guess — owner_occupancy remains unknown.

Listings reference elevator access and fob-controlled elevator/entry, but no remark provides a numeric count (e.g., 2, 3, 4). Per rules, we will not guess a number without an explicit statement; field remains unknown.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Multiple agents explicitly state that A/C-related electricity or chiller usage is submetered and billed based on usage, not included in a flat HOA fee. With only 3 of 20 listings checking central A/C in fee-includes, the evidence points to central A/C being available but paid for separately by owners. Thus, maintenance does not truly include central air conditioning service.

15 of 20 current listings mark CABTV as included in association fees. While agent remarks rarely state 'cable included' verbatim, several listings reference fiber/cable upgrades or 'fiber to the unit,' and there is no clear contradiction across remarks. Evidence is consistent across multiple agent entries, though mostly inferred from MLS checkboxes rather than repeated explicit remarks.

17 of 20 listings mark OTCOEX (common area electricity) as included. Several remarks explicitly note 'Separate metered electric, all other utilities included in HOA fees' and that electric is submetered for units, implying the HOA covers common-area electrical costs. This is corroborated across many agent listings and appears building-wide.

The building is consistently described as fee simple or leasehold condominium ownership, never as a co-op. No listings mention cooperative taxes, and the COOTAX checkbox is absent across all MLS data. This strongly indicates cooperative taxes are not part of the fees.

At least four different listings clearly say electricity is separately metered and paid by the owner, sometimes specifying that only other utilities are included in the HOA. No listing claims electricity is included in maintenance fees, and the ELECTR checkbox is unused in MLS data. This is strong, consistent evidence that electricity is not included in the maintenance fees.

Listings repeatedly describe electric or induction cooking and focus only on electric utilities, never mentioning gas service. With no MLS entries indicating gas in the HOA and no remarks about gas lines or gas billing, it is very likely that gas is neither provided nor included in the maintenance fees.

13 of 20 current listings indicate HOTWAT is included, and several remarks state 'all other utilities included in HOA fees' (with electric separately metered), which implies hot water is covered by the HOA. Only 1 of 20 listings lists WTRHTR, so the preponderance of evidence supports hot water being included.

Internet service is checked in 7 of 20 MLS listings and a few remarks reference fiber or custom in-unit fiber installations. There is limited direct confirmation that the HOA includes internet across the building; evidence is mixed and primarily implied from some listings rather than broadly stated, so confidence is moderate.

Several listings mention that the building is near the Hawaii and Waikiki Yacht Clubs and the marina, but none state that marina access or boat slip fees are included in the HOA. With no MARINA checkbox usage in MLS, there is strong evidence that marina costs are not part of the maintenance fees. Access appears to be purely location-based, not an included amenity fee.

17 of 20 current listings mark SEWER as included. Multiple remarks state 'Separate metered electric, all other utilities included in HOA fees,' which supports that sewer is covered by the HOA. This is consistently reported across many agent listings and corroborated by the language in remarks.

17 of 20 listings indicate water is included in HOA fees. Remarks such as 'Separate metered electric, all other utilities included in HOA fees' and other agent notes repeatedly isolate electric as the only separately billed utility, providing strong, building-wide evidence that water is included.

Strong, consistent evidence across listings: approximately 19 of 20 current MLS listings/remarks reference a BBQ facility (quotes include 'large BBQ area w/sundeck', 'BBQ area', 'BBQ deck'). Multiple agents independently mention the shared BBQ/pool sundeck amenity, indicating this is a bona fide building-level feature rather than a single listing copy/paste error.

At least a few separate listings expressly note 'surfboard and bicycle storage' or 'storage from bicycles and surfboards' available on the premises, indicating a dedicated common-area facility for bikes. The repeated, specific wording across multiple agents suggests a real, building-level amenity rather than a copy error. Buyers seeking bicycle storage should consider this building as offering that feature.

Agents emphasize that the building is across from Hilton Hawaiian Village and near yacht clubs and beaches, not directly on a marina. The absence of terms like boat dock, slip, or mooring in combination with MLS data indicates the project has no boat dock of its own.

Agents frequently detail parking (secured, covered, guest, rentable) but do not reference any car wash or auto wash area. The complete lack of mentions combined with unchecked MLS data makes it very likely that no car wash amenity exists.

Amenity descriptions focus on pool, BBQ area, recreation area, security, and storage, with no mention of a clubhouse or community center. The complete absence of both textual and MLS evidence strongly indicates there is no clubhouse amenity.

Detailed amenity descriptions never mention concierge or front-desk services, even in higher-end or penthouse listings that highlight many features. With only 2 of 20 MLS records ticking concierge and no textual support, it's very likely the building does not provide concierge service.

Multiple agents note that the building is pet-friendly and allow two dogs or cats, yet none refer to an on-site dog park or dog run. With no textual support and all MLS entries leaving DGPRK unchecked, the building almost certainly lacks a dedicated dog park.

Across all provided remarks, amenities like pool, BBQ, resident manager, and security guards are repeatedly described, but there is no reference to any doorman or lobby attendant service. Combined with DOORMA being unchecked in all MLS entries, this strongly suggests the building does not offer a doorman.

Across numerous remarks, agents repeatedly list amenities such as pool, BBQ area, recreation area, security, and storage but never mention a gym, fitness room, or fitness center. With just 1 of 20 MLS entries checking this box and no textual support, it is very likely the building does not have a shared exercise room.

While the building is described as well-located and secure with good parking, no listing mentions limousine service, a house car, or any complimentary car service that luxury buildings sometimes offer. With no textual or MLS evidence, limousine or house car service can be safely ruled out.

Despite extensive descriptions of building features, no listing refers to a meeting room, conference room, or community room. With just a single MLS checkbox and no supporting narrative, a shared meeting room is unlikely to exist.

Multiple listings (16 of 20 per MLS checkbox history) explicitly mention lanais/balconies: quotes include "huge 226 sq. ft. wrap around lanai," "124 sq. ft. lanai," and "spacious lanai." Evidence is consistent across many agent remarks and listing details (not isolated to a single listing), indicating the building offers patios/decks as a common amenity rather than a copy-paste error.

Agents often highlight proximity to Fort DeRussy Park, Ala Moana Beach Park, and other outdoor spaces, including “views” of parks and jogging paths, but never describe a dedicated jogging or walking path as a building amenity. This context plus 0/20 MLS checkmarks indicates jogging paths are neighborhood features, not on-site building amenities.

Across many listings, amenities like pool, BBQ, recreation area, and security are consistently mentioned, but there is no indication of any kids’ playground or tot lot. The combination of explicit omissions and zero MLS checkmarks strongly suggests there is no playground.

Listings consistently describe outdoor space as lanais or balcony terraces, not yards, and there is no language about a private or fenced yard for any unit. The few extra-large terraces are penthouse-specific and not a general building feature, so buyers should not expect private yard space in this building.

Listings emphasize views, pool, BBQ, and recreation area, but never mention any golf or putting facilities. With no textual or MLS evidence, it is safe to conclude the building does not have a putting green.

Multiple agents describe “amenities such as a pool, recreation area, secured parking” and “a pristine pool, recreation area, and secure parking facilities,” indicating a common rec/amenity area. These consistent remarks across different listings support that the building offers a shared recreation area alongside the pool and BBQ.

Several listings mention a “recreation area” but none describe an indoor recreation or game room, hospitality room, or similar enclosed space. Given just 2/20 MLS checks and lack of explicit confirmation in remarks, a shared recreation room likely does not exist.

Good evidence that the building offers on-site dining/retail: numerous remarks mention 'Island Country Market', 'ABC Store on the ground level', 'deli and sushi bar', and 'on-site dining/retail'. Several independent listings reference the same ground-floor market and deli, supporting that an on-site market/dining option is available in the building.

One penthouse listing highlights a “979 square foot private balcony terrace,” indicating unit-specific outdoor space rather than a common rooftop. The lack of any “rooftop” or “roof deck” references in numerous detailed amenity lists plus unchecked MLS data makes a shared rooftop amenity very unlikely.

Despite many detailed descriptions of amenities, there is no reference to a sauna, steam room, or similar facility. With no textual support and zero MLS checkmarks, the building almost certainly does not have a sauna.

Strong evidence that the building offers storage units/lockers: historic MLS checkbox data indicated 15/20 listings, and current remarks in many listings explicitly mention storage (examples: 'two deeded storage units just outside your door', '2 storage lockers', 'additional storage conveniently situated near the front door', 'storage box/locker'). The consistency and specificity across multiple agents/listings indicate this is a real, building-level amenity rather than copy-paste error.

Several listings clearly state the building provides surfboard storage (often alongside bicycle storage), e.g., 'Includes surfboard and bicycle storage' and 'storage from bicycles and surfboards', supporting this feature.

In detailed amenity lists, agents highlight pool, BBQ, recreation area, security, and storage but never reference tennis courts. With all MLS entries leaving TENCOU unchecked and zero textual evidence, it is very likely the building has no tennis court.

Most MLS checkbox data historically indicates trash chutes (17 of 20 listings checked), but public remarks do not explicitly mention a 'trash chute' or 'garbage chute'. Because historical prevalence is high and no listings report removal, the building is kept as offering a trash chute system with moderate confidence (implied from checkbox prevalence rather than direct remark mentions).

Parking is consistently described as 'secured', 'covered', 'assigned', or 'garage' parking, often with specific stall numbers and levels. No listing advertises valet or valet parking, which would typically be promoted if available, so valet service can be safely ruled out.

Listings consistently describe secure/covered parking and keyed building access but never mention a gated or fenced perimeter, 'gated community,' or similar language. Together with all MLS entries leaving GATED/WALFEN unchecked, this strongly indicates there is no wall or fence forming a perimeter security feature.

Amenity lists consistently include pool and BBQ but never a hot tub, jacuzzi, or spa at the building level. The only whirlpool-related mention is a private in-unit jacuzzi bathtub, which does not qualify as a common building amenity, so a shared whirlpool is very unlikely.

High-confidence evidence that the building has a pool: 20 listings (all current MLS entries) reference the amenity. Remarks repeatedly state phrases like 'swimming pool', 'heated pool', 'refreshing pool', and 'pool and BBQ area', showing strong, consistent confirmation across multiple agent listings rather than a single copy-paste error.

At least five separate listings specifically describe a 'heated pool' or 'pool that is heated' as a building amenity, often grouped with BBQ areas and security, indicating this is a common-area feature rather than unit-specific marketing language. Although only 9/20 MLS entries flag HEAPOO, the consistent explicit phrasing in remarks across multiple years and agents strongly supports that the Wailana at Waikiki pool is heated.

I searched all pool descriptions for terms like 'salt water pool' or 'saline pool' and found none. Remarks mention heated/refreshing pools and BBQ areas but do not specify saltwater.

Strong building-level evidence: 20 of 20 current listings include washer/dryer in inclusions and numerous remarks explicitly state in-unit laundry. Example quotes: "washer/dryer", "in-unit washer and dryer", and "stack washer dryer in unit". Evidence is consistent across many agent listings (not isolated), supporting high confidence that some units in the building have in-unit laundry.

Across dozens of listings, agents consistently describe building amenities (pool, BBQ, security, storage, surfboard/bike storage, etc.) but never mention a community or shared laundry room. MLS amenities data also shows 0/20 listings checking the community-laundry box. This strong and repeated omission, alongside widespread in-unit laundry, indicates the building likely does not have separate community laundry facilities.

I searched for terms such as 'coin laundry', 'coin-op', 'card-operated', 'quarters', and 'paid laundry' and found none. Remarks repeatedly note in-unit washers/dryers and building storage, but no paid community laundry references.

I searched all public remarks for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', or 'floor-by-floor laundry' and found no references. Many listings instead reference in-unit washer/dryer, but nothing indicates community laundry on every floor.

Nearly all unit descriptions mention at least one parking stall or space (e.g., “1 parking stall,” “2 parking spaces,” “with covered parking”), and MLS data confirms parking for 20/20 listings. Buyers can expect this building to offer on-site parking with the units.

Multiple listings (at least ~15 separate remarks) explicitly mention assigned or dedicated stalls—phrases include 'one secured and assigned parking space', 'one assigned parking stall (#322)', and 'two dedicated parking spaces'. Mentions appear across many different agent remarks (not isolated to a single copy/paste), supporting high confidence that the building offers assigned parking.

Evidence is consistent and widespread—over a dozen listings explicitly state 'covered parking' or 'secured garage parking' (e.g., 'one covered, secured parking stall', 'secured covered parking'). This aligns with the historical 20/20 MLS checkbox data and supports very high confidence that the building provides covered parking.

Listings mention assigned/secured parking stalls and some units having two parking spaces, but none explicitly say parking is deeded; only storage is referred to as 'deeded' in some remarks. No explicit evidence found that parking stalls are deeded.

Across all provided remarks, parking is described in detail but never with any reference to EV charging stations. Combined with 0/20 MLS checkboxes for EV charging, this strongly suggests the building does not currently offer dedicated EV charging infrastructure.

There is evidence that extra/guest parking can be rented for a fee (daily or monthly), but no explicit monthly parking fee amount is provided in the public remarks. Searched for '$/month' or similar but found none.

Remarks in at least one listing directly reference 'Guest parking stalls & additional covered parking available for daily or monthly rent,' and others describe additional public/paid parking on site. Together with multiple MLS records marking guest parking and prior high confidence, this supports that the building offers guest/visitor parking options.

At least ~12 listings explicitly reference secured access for parking or building entry—quotes include 'secured and assigned parking space', 'fob controlled garage/elevator access', and 'controlled access requiring security fobs for entry and elevator use'. The security descriptions appear across multiple agent remarks (not limited to a single source), giving strong confidence that parking has secured entry/access.

Where two stalls are mentioned (e.g., penthouse units with two spaces), the style is never described as tandem, and the MLS data never flags TANDEM. This strongly indicates tandem parking is not a defined or marketed parking type in this building.

Despite very detailed amenity and parking descriptions, there is no reference to valet or attended parking service in any remark. Combined with the absence of the VALET checkbox in all MLS records, this supports that the building does not offer valet parking.

Searched remarks for terms like 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list', or 'join waitlist' and found no references. The listings describe assigned/secured parking but do not mention any waitlist system.

Several independent listings mention secure elevator access, using phrases like 'security fobs for entry and elevator use', 'fob controlled garage/elevator access', and 'keyed entry, elevator & parking garage'. This consistent language across different agents confirms that elevator access is controlled by key or fob.

Multiple listings explicitly describe fob/keycard controlled access for building entry and elevators (e.g., 'controlled access requiring security fobs' and 'fob controlled garage/elevator access'), indicating card/fob security.

Strong evidence that Wailana at Waikiki provides security guard/on-site security: current remarks across multiple listings (at least 8 instances) explicitly state 'Security guard & on-site cameras,' '24/7 security,' 'on-site security,' or similar. Historical MLS data also showed SECGUA checked on 15 of 20 listings, indicating consistent agent reporting rather than a single copy/paste error.

I searched for phrases like 'security patrol', 'roving security', or 'patrol service' and did not find them. While listings reference security guards and on-site security, there is no explicit mention of a security patrol service.

Remarks from at least one listing state 'Security guard & on-site cameras', directly confirming video surveillance in the building. Although no agents checked the SECSYS box, the explicit reference to on-site cameras is strong evidence that video security exists.

High-confidence evidence that the building has central air: historical MLS checkboxes were set in the majority of units (17/20 unit_features; 19/20 inclusions) and numerous current listing remarks explicitly mention 'central air conditioning' or 'central A/C' (e.g., 'central AC unit was replaced in 2022', 'central air conditioning'). Mentions appear across multiple agent listings and include specifics about system replacements, indicating the feature is real and present for many units.

Across a large number of listings, agents consistently describe central A/C and a building chiller system but never mention split, ductless, or mini-split air conditioning in any unit. With 0/20 MLS inclusions for split AC and no textual evidence, split AC systems do not appear to be a feature offered in this building’s units.

Listings repeatedly market central A/C and chiller-based cooling but never reference window or wall air conditioners, and no MLS records show window AC for any unit. This consistent absence indicates that window AC is not a feature buyers can expect in this building.

Strong historical evidence: 19 of 20 listings previously marked CONCRE in construction materials. Current remarks are consistent with a reinforced concrete high-rise (mentions of high floors, penthouses, secured garage parking, and 'concrete painted floors'). Evidence is broad across many listings and from multiple agents, supporting high confidence that the building is concrete construction.

Double-wall construction is not indicated anywhere in MLS data or remarks for this high-rise condo. The absence of any mention supports concluding that double-wall construction is not a defining feature.

Neither the MLS construction materials field nor the remarks suggest hollow-tile construction. This supports concluding that hollow tile is not a primary construction type for this building.

A significant subset of listings (8 of 20) explicitly check masonry/stucco in the MLS construction materials, and no remarks mention a different exterior wall system. This pattern across multiple agents suggests the building has masonry and stucco components, even though it is not always mentioned in narrative remarks.

MLS data overwhelmingly points to concrete construction, with just a small minority (2 of 20) inconsistently checking steel frame and no textual support in remarks. Multiple independent descriptions emphasize the building as a standard concrete high-rise with no mention of a steel frame system, so steel frame construction is very unlikely.

There is minimal and inconsistent MLS indication of slab construction and no textual support in remarks. Given the high-rise context and lack of consistent tagging, it is unlikely this building should be identified with the 'slab' construction feature.

No analysis available

No listings check wood-frame construction and no remarks mention it, which strongly indicates the building is not wood-frame. As a high-rise Waikiki condo, it is almost certainly non-wood structural construction.

Multiple listings (many units reference specific floor levels and penthouse/high-floor positions such as 7th, 11th, 17th, 19th and 21st floors) and repeated references to wrap-around lanais and panoramic views indicate above-ground multi-story construction. While fewer current MLS checkboxes list ABOGRO, the remarks across many agents consistently imply an above-ground high-rise building, supporting moderate-to-high confidence.

There is no MLS or remarks evidence of any brick or brick-and-mortar construction. Given the high-rise condo context and complete absence of mentions, brick construction can be ruled out.

There is no MLS or remarks support for single-wall construction, and the building type makes it very unlikely. It can be confidently treated as not single-wall construction.

Public remarks consistently indicate short-term rentals are prohibited, with repeated minimum rental periods (90 days or 6 months) and explicit statements disallowing vacation/short-term rentals.

Because short-term rentals are not permitted, there is no evidence the building participates in a hotel rental pool. Searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel program', and similar terms with no results.

With STRs prohibited and no evidence of any rental-pool program, there is no mandatory hotel pool participation. Also searched for 'mandatory', 'must participate', and 'required to participate' with no results.

The building clearly contains Fee Simple units: numerous listings call out 'Fee Simple' or 'fee-simple unit', and several emphasize they are 'rarely available' versus the leasehold stock. From the supplied remarks, at least 6–8 of the described listings are explicitly Fee Simple, confirming that FS ownership exists alongside leasehold units.

Leasehold units are widely documented: over 20 listings in the combined remarks reference leasehold status, lease rent, or lease terms, with repeated notes that leases run to 2039 or 2069 and can often be extended (e.g., for $35–45k). Another remark explicitly states there are both Fee Simple units and two lease structures ending in 2039 and 2069, so the building clearly offers both LH and FS, with the majority of listings being leasehold.

Several listings explicitly state the ground lease has been extended through 2069; where multiple years appear (2039 and 2069), the most recent/extended year (2069) is used.

Multiple listings explicitly identify the building/unit as VA-approved and advertise a VA-assumable loan. Evidence in the remarks clearly indicates VA financing is accepted.

I scanned remarks for insurance coverage terms (e.g., "fully insured", "walls-in coverage") and found none. In absence of explicit statements and no current value, set to false with medium confidence.

Neither remarks nor MLS amenity checkboxes indicate the presence of a building fire sprinkler system; agents repeatedly list amenities like pool, BBQ, security, and storage but never sprinklers. Given this consistent omission and 0/20 FIRSPR entries, it is likely the building does not have a central fire sprinkler system, though this is inferred rather than explicitly stated.

I searched all remarks for FLSE/fire safety certification language and found none. With no explicit mentions and no existing current value, the default is set to false with medium confidence.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Multiple current listings explicitly mention ocean or Pacific views (e.g., "ocean and Diamond Head Views", "partial ocean view", "Pacific ocean"). Ocean or partial ocean/ocean glimpses are referenced across many agent remarks and in high-floor/penthouse descriptions, showing consistent confirmation from multiple agents rather than a single copy/paste line.

Around 10 listings explicitly highlight mountain views, including phrases like 'breathtaking panoramic views of the mountains, Diamond Head, and the ocean' and 'unparalleled views of ... the majestic Ko'olau mountain range'. These consistent descriptions across various units confirm that the building offers mountain-view condos.

Diamond Head is explicitly referenced in the vast majority of listings (phrases like "Diamond Head views", "stunning city and Diamond Head views", "mesmerizing Diamond Head") including high-floor and penthouse units. Evidence is strong across many separate remarks and agents.

Many listings mention city/downtown/cityscape views (e.g., "city views", "city skyline", "All of Waikiki with its breathtaking views"). These references appear across multiple agent remarks and unit levels, indicating the building offers city-facing view units.

Multiple listings reference coastal or shoreline-type views (examples: "coastal view", "coastline", "ocean and coastline"), along with repeated ocean and park vantage descriptions, indicating the building offers units with coastline-facing vistas.

Many listings highlight views of Fort DeRussy Park and surrounding greenery using phrases like 'view overlooking the open area of Fort DeRussy', 'amazing views of Diamond Head, multiple lush parks and jogging paths', 'beautiful treetop outlook', and 'picturesque panoramic views of Diamond Head, green parks, and the Pacific Ocean.' Such consistent references across different stacks and floors show that the building offers units with strong park/green (garden‑type) views. The structured MLS field simply under‑reports this nuanced garden/park outlook.

None of the many unit descriptions reference a golf course, fairway, or greens, despite frequent detailed descriptions of other views. Combined with 0/20 MLS view descriptors including GOLCOU, this strongly suggests the building does not offer golf course views. This is treated as a correction from the default 'unknown' to 'no' for building-level golf course views.

One listing clearly advertises 'stunning views of the ocean, harbor, and city skyline', which meets the criteria for a marina/harbor view. Other remarks emphasize proximity to the Hilton Hawaiian Village, beaches, and yacht clubs, consistent with that sightline. This shows that at least some units enjoy harbor/marina views that buyers may seek.

At least one penthouse/high-floor listing explicitly mentions sunrise views ("sunrise rising over the mountain") and several listings reference morning light/eastern exposure or enjoying morning coffee on the lanai, supporting that some units offer sunrise-facing views.

Well over 5 listings highlight evening/sunset experiences: 'sunset cocktails overlooking amazing views of Diamond Head', 'watching the sunset over world-class views', 'breathtaking sunsets of Oahu's west side', and 'Friday night fireworks' from the lanai. These show that many units have strong western exposure with sunset and fireworks views, making sunset a key selling point for the building.

Across dozens of detailed descriptions emphasizing views of Diamond Head, ocean, parks, mountains, and city lights, there is no reference to any cemetery. Given also that no agents checked the cemetery view box in the MLS, it's reasonable to conclude that cemetery views are not a characteristic of this building.

Several public remarks explicitly state that Friday night fireworks at Hilton Hawaiian Village can be seen from units/lanai (e.g., 'Every Friday night, relax on your lanai and watch the Hilton Hawaiian Village fireworks'). This directly supports fireworks view from the building.

No analysis available

Multiple agents describe the building as 'pet-friendly' with clear limits like '2 dogs or 2 cats (max weight 35 lbs each)' across different listings. This repeated, specific language from various units confirms that pets (dogs and cats) are allowed under stated restrictions.

Multiple listings for Wailana at Waikiki explicitly mention a resident or building manager, such as 'resident manager, fob controlled garage/elevator access & on-site security' and 'Building amenities include a manager, security, library, pool and barbecue area.' This corroborates earlier MLS checkbox data (RESMAN in 12/20 listings) and strongly supports that the building has an on-site resident manager. Evidence is consistent across different listings and agents, not just a single copy-paste remark.

The building is marketed as a residential condo with leasehold/fee-simple ownership and explicit minimum rental periods, not nightly or hotel-style rentals. The consistent absence of any hotel-program language and the presence of minimum-stay rules indicate it is not a condotel.

Ownership is consistently described in condominium terms (fee simple and leasehold with specified lease-end dates and extension fees), not as a cooperative share structure. The lack of any co-op terminology across extensive marketing materials strongly supports that the building is not a co-op.