Wailana at Waikiki

MLS property data is highly consistent with 49 listings showing 1970 as the construction year and only 2 outliers at 1974. With no remarks suggesting another build year, 1970 is adopted as the building’s year built.

Remarks reference high floors and penthouses (e.g., 19th floor just below penthouse, 21st-level penthouse), and MLS unit data for this building includes units up to the 24th floor. In the absence of a stated 'X-story' count, we infer a 24-floor building from the maximum observed floor in MLS.

No listing remarks state how many units are in Wailana at Waikiki, and no trustworthy MLS unit-total data was provided. Because the building unit count is never specified, it cannot be reliably determined from the available information.

The remarks include statements about individual sellers owning or occupying particular units, but they do not provide a building-wide owner-occupancy figure. Because no explicit percentage or equivalent building-level description exists, the value is unknown.

The remarks were searched for an explicit count such as '4 elevators,' 'four elevators,' or 'multiple elevators.' No elevator count was found, so the number cannot be determined without guessing.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Central A/C does not appear to be included in maintenance fees. While many listings mention central AC as a unit feature, the remarks consistently describe AC power/chiller as separately metered or charged by usage, which is inconsistent with HOA-included central air.

Cable/TV inclusion is directly mentioned in at least 2 listings, including "Cable/Internet" and "Wifi/TV Included in AOAO dues." The MLS pattern is exceptionally strong at 18/20 listings and corroborates the historical high-confidence conclusion.

No listing explicitly states that common-area electricity is included, so evidence is primarily the MLS inclusion code. OTCOEX appears in 18/20 listings across the building, making inclusion highly likely rather than an isolated agent entry.

The building is consistently described as fee simple or leasehold condominium ownership, never as a co-op. No listings mention cooperative taxes, and the COOTAX checkbox is absent across all MLS data. This strongly indicates cooperative taxes are not part of the fees.

Electricity is not supported as an included fee item here. Several listings say electricity is separately metered, sub-metered, or billed based on usage, and the MLS shows only 1 of 20 listings with ELECTR. That combination strongly indicates the feature should be corrected to false.

Listings repeatedly describe electric or induction cooking and focus only on electric utilities, never mentioning gas service. With no MLS entries indicating gas in the HOA and no remarks about gas lines or gas billing, it is very likely that gas is neither provided nor included in the maintenance fees.

Sixteen of 20 listings identify HOTWAT in the association fee inclusions, and only two identify WTRHTR. No remarks explicitly contradict building-supplied hot water, so the multi-listing MLS evidence supports inclusion, with minor uncertainty from the two heater entries.

Internet inclusion is supported by 14/20 MLS records. Public remarks include “HOA incls Cable/Internet” and another listing itemizes the monthly fee as including “internet, cable TV,” providing direct confirmation beyond checkbox data.

Several listings mention that the building is near the Hawaii and Waikiki Yacht Clubs and the marina, but none state that marina access or boat slip fees are included in the HOA. With no MARINA checkbox usage in MLS, there is strong evidence that marina costs are not part of the maintenance fees. Access appears to be purely location-based, not an included amenity fee.

Sewer is included in 18/20 current MLS listings. One remark directly confirms that the maintenance fee covers “water, sewer, and building amenities,” reinforcing that this is a building-level inclusion rather than a single copied checkbox.

Water is identified as included in 18/20 current MLS records. The remark that the monthly maintenance fee covers “water, sewer, and building amenities” directly confirms the inclusion and aligns with the broad MLS pattern.

BBQ is mentioned explicitly across many listings from multiple agents, with at least 18 of 20 current MLS records identifying the amenity. Remarks repeatedly describe a shared BBQ area or deck associated with the pool, lounge, or recreation space, providing strong confirmation beyond checkbox data.

At least a few separate listings expressly note 'surfboard and bicycle storage' or 'storage from bicycles and surfboards' available on the premises, indicating a dedicated common-area facility for bikes. The repeated, specific wording across multiple agents suggests a real, building-level amenity rather than a copy error. Buyers seeking bicycle storage should consider this building as offering that feature.

Agents emphasize that the building is across from Hilton Hawaiian Village and near yacht clubs and beaches, not directly on a marina. The absence of terms like boat dock, slip, or mooring in combination with MLS data indicates the project has no boat dock of its own.

There is no meaningful support for a car wash facility. Across the provided remarks, agents discuss parking, storage, security, and building amenities, but never a car wash or auto wash area. With only 1 of 20 MLS listings checking the box and no remark support, this is best corrected to false.

Amenity descriptions focus on pool, BBQ area, recreation area, security, and storage, with no mention of a clubhouse or community center. The complete absence of both textual and MLS evidence strongly indicates there is no clubhouse amenity.

Detailed amenity descriptions never mention concierge or front-desk services, even in higher-end or penthouse listings that highlight many features. With only 2 of 20 MLS records ticking concierge and no textual support, it's very likely the building does not provide concierge service.

Multiple agents note that the building is pet-friendly and allow two dogs or cats, yet none refer to an on-site dog park or dog run. With no textual support and all MLS entries leaving DGPRK unchecked, the building almost certainly lacks a dedicated dog park.

Across all provided remarks, amenities like pool, BBQ, resident manager, and security guards are repeatedly described, but there is no reference to any doorman or lobby attendant service. Combined with DOORMA being unchecked in all MLS entries, this strongly suggests the building does not offer a doorman.

Across numerous remarks, agents repeatedly list amenities such as pool, BBQ area, recreation area, security, and storage but never mention a gym, fitness room, or fitness center. With just 1 of 20 MLS entries checking this box and no textual support, it is very likely the building does not have a shared exercise room.

While the building is described as well-located and secure with good parking, no listing mentions limousine service, a house car, or any complimentary car service that luxury buildings sometimes offer. With no textual or MLS evidence, limousine or house car service can be safely ruled out.

Despite extensive descriptions of building features, no listing refers to a meeting room, conference room, or community room. With just a single MLS checkbox and no supporting narrative, a shared meeting room is unlikely to exist.

At least 18 of the 20 listing remarks mention a lanai, balcony, patio, or deck, including multiple-agent descriptions of private lanais and large wrap-around or covered outdoor spaces. The repeated, detailed references across many listings strongly confirm that the building offers patio/deck-type outdoor spaces rather than reflecting simple checkbox copy-paste.

Agents often highlight proximity to Fort DeRussy Park, Ala Moana Beach Park, and other outdoor spaces, including “views” of parks and jogging paths, but never describe a dedicated jogging or walking path as a building amenity. This context plus 0/20 MLS checkmarks indicates jogging paths are neighborhood features, not on-site building amenities.

Across many listings, amenities like pool, BBQ, recreation area, and security are consistently mentioned, but there is no indication of any kids’ playground or tot lot. The combination of explicit omissions and zero MLS checkmarks strongly suggests there is no playground.

Listings consistently describe outdoor space as lanais or balcony terraces, not yards, and there is no language about a private or fenced yard for any unit. The few extra-large terraces are penthouse-specific and not a general building feature, so buyers should not expect private yard space in this building.

Listings emphasize views, pool, BBQ, and recreation area, but never mention any golf or putting facilities. With no textual or MLS evidence, it is safe to conclude the building does not have a putting green.

There is credible evidence for a shared recreation area, though it is less consistently advertised than BBQ. One listing explicitly says the building offers 'a pool, recreation area,' and another references amenity areas like a 'recreation area' alongside secured parking. Because the MLS signal is only present in a subset of listings, confidence is solid but not as high as BBQ.

No listing remarks describe a recreation room, rec room, game room, or entertainment room. Mentions that might sound related are actually about a recreation area or other shared outdoor amenities, so this feature does not appear to be present.

Restaurant or dining facilities are supported by 9 of 20 current MLS records and several detailed remarks. Listings specifically describe on-site dining/retail and a ground-floor Island Country Market or deli offering coffee, poke, sushi, and other prepared food, so this is more than a generic nearby-restaurant reference.

One penthouse listing highlights a “979 square foot private balcony terrace,” indicating unit-specific outdoor space rather than a common rooftop. The lack of any “rooftop” or “roof deck” references in numerous detailed amenity lists plus unchecked MLS data makes a shared rooftop amenity very unlikely.

Despite many detailed descriptions of amenities, there is no reference to a sauna, steam room, or similar facility. With no textual support and zero MLS checkmarks, the building almost certainly does not have a sauna.

Storage is mentioned in numerous current listings, well exceeding 10 of 20 and appearing across multiple agents rather than in a single isolated remark. Repeated specific descriptions of deeded storage units, lockers near unit doors, and building storage strongly confirm that Wailana at Waikiki offers storage units/lockers.

The building's surfboard-storage amenity is directly and repeatedly identified in public remarks. This is explicit evidence of dedicated board storage, often paired with bicycle storage.

In detailed amenity lists, agents highlight pool, BBQ, recreation area, security, and storage but never reference tennis courts. With all MLS entries leaving TENCOU unchecked and zero textual evidence, it is very likely the building has no tennis court.

Trash chutes are identified in 17 of 20 current MLS listings, consistent with the previously high-confidence building record. Public remarks generally omit this operational feature, but there is no contradictory evidence or indication that the amenity was removed.

Parking is consistently described as 'secured', 'covered', 'assigned', or 'garage' parking, often with specific stall numbers and levels. No listing advertises valet or valet parking, which would typically be promoted if available, so valet service can be safely ruled out.

Listings consistently describe secure/covered parking and keyed building access but never mention a gated or fenced perimeter, 'gated community,' or similar language. Together with all MLS entries leaving GATED/WALFEN unchecked, this strongly indicates there is no wall or fence forming a perimeter security feature.

Amenity lists consistently include pool and BBQ but never a hot tub, jacuzzi, or spa at the building level. The only whirlpool-related mention is a private in-unit jacuzzi bathtub, which does not qualify as a common building amenity, so a shared whirlpool is very unlikely.

The pool is explicitly mentioned in well over 15 listings, with phrases including "swimming pool," "refreshing pool," "pool and BBQ area," and "large BBQ area and pool area." The repeated references across many listing versions and agents, together with 20/20 current MLS amenity records, provide overwhelming evidence that Wailana offers a building pool.

Heated pool is supported by multiple current listings and remarks. Several listings explicitly say "heated pool" or "a pool that is heated," which suggests the amenity is real and recurring rather than a copy-paste error.

The building has a pool, and several listings describe it as heated. Searches for salt water pool, saltwater pool, salt pool, and saline pool found no evidence.

At least 15 current listings explicitly mention in-unit laundry, with repeated phrases such as "in-unit washer/dryer," "washer and dryer in unit," and "stack washer dryer in unit." The evidence is strong across many listings and aligns with the current MLS data showing WASHER/DRYER in inclusions for 19 of 20 listings, confirming that the building offers units with in-unit laundry.

Across dozens of listings, agents consistently describe building amenities (pool, BBQ, security, storage, surfboard/bike storage, etc.) but never mention a community or shared laundry room. MLS amenities data also shows 0/20 listings checking the community-laundry box. This strong and repeated omission, alongside widespread in-unit laundry, indicates the building likely does not have separate community laundry facilities.

There is no public-remark evidence of a paid shared laundry facility. Payment-related terms such as coin laundry, quarters, laundry fee, and card-operated laundry were not found.

The listings consistently identify private in-unit laundry rather than floor-by-floor community laundry. Searches for "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," and similar terms found no matches.

Nearly all unit descriptions mention at least one parking stall or space (e.g., “1 parking stall,” “2 parking spaces,” “with covered parking”), and MLS data confirms parking for 20/20 listings. Buyers can expect this building to offer on-site parking with the units.

At least 13 listings explicitly mention assigned or equivalent parking, including “secured and assigned parking space,” “one assigned parking stall,” “two dedicated parking spaces,” and “2 deeded” parking-related spaces. The evidence appears across many listings and agents and is consistent with the historically high-confidence conclusion that the building offers assigned parking.

Covered parking is strongly validated across the listings, with numerous explicit phrases including "covered deeded parking stall," "one covered parking space," "secured covered parking," "covered secured parking stall," and "secure garage parking." The evidence appears across many different remarks and listing descriptions, not merely a single checkbox or isolated copy-paste entry, and confirms that the building offers covered parking.

Several public remarks directly identify unit parking as deeded, owned, assigned, or included. The explicit deeded-parking language supports a true value with very high confidence.

Across all provided remarks, parking is described in detail but never with any reference to EV charging stations. Combined with 0/20 MLS checkboxes for EV charging, this strongly suggests the building does not currently offer dedicated EV charging infrastructure.

Fee-based additional parking is mentioned, but the remarks do not give a specific monthly parking fee for the unit or building. The "$740 monthly LH fee" is a land-lease charge, not a parking fee.

Guest parking appears to be available, though mentioned less often than assigned or covered parking. One listing explicitly notes 'Guest parking stalls & additional covered parking available for daily or monthly rent,' which is strong direct evidence, and the historical MLS data also shows guest parking in a meaningful subset of listings. The feature looks real at the building level, but not as universally or consistently advertised as covered parking.

There is strong evidence that parking has secured entry or controlled access. Listings mention 'secured parking,' 'controlled access requiring security fobs for entry and elevator use,' 'fob controlled garage/elevator access,' and 'on-site security,' indicating secure access rather than ordinary open parking. This is consistent across numerous remarks and does not look like a one-off agent error.

Where two stalls are mentioned (e.g., penthouse units with two spaces), the style is never described as tandem, and the MLS data never flags TANDEM. This strongly indicates tandem parking is not a defined or marketed parking type in this building.

Despite very detailed amenity and parking descriptions, there is no reference to valet or attended parking service in any remark. Combined with the absence of the VALET checkbox in all MLS records, this supports that the building does not offer valet parking.

The remarks discuss assigned, secured, covered, guest, public, and rentable parking, including additional parking for a fee. They do not mention any parking waitlist system, so there is no evidence supporting a true value.

Several independent listings mention secure elevator access, using phrases like 'security fobs for entry and elevator use', 'fob controlled garage/elevator access', and 'keyed entry, elevator & parking garage'. This consistent language across different agents confirms that elevator access is controlled by key or fob.

Multiple listings directly confirm fob- or electronically controlled access for building, elevator, garage, and parking areas. This provides strong, repeated evidence of a card/fob security system.

Security guard service is strongly supported across the listings: at least 8 remarks explicitly mention "security guard," "24/7 security," or "on-site security," including references to an on-site security presence and security cameras. This aligns with the current MLS amenity data showing SECGUA in 17/20 listings and the previously high-confidence determination.

The public remarks support the presence of security personnel and surveillance, consistent with the building context. However, the defined feature requires explicit patrol-service evidence, and no such wording was found.

Remarks from at least one listing state 'Security guard & on-site cameras', directly confirming video surveillance in the building. Although no agents checked the SECSYS box, the explicit reference to on-site cameras is strong evidence that video security exists.

At least 20 listings mention central air conditioning or clearly identify it as included, with numerous distinct remarks stating "central A/C," "central air conditioning," or that electricity/chiller for A/C is submetered. Multiple listings also describe replacement or installation of newer AC systems, so the evidence is strong across many agents and corroborates the MLS data rather than appearing to be an isolated copied checkbox.

Across a large number of listings, agents consistently describe central A/C and a building chiller system but never mention split, ductless, or mini-split air conditioning in any unit. With 0/20 MLS inclusions for split AC and no textual evidence, split AC systems do not appear to be a feature offered in this building’s units.

Listings repeatedly market central A/C and chiller-based cooling but never reference window or wall air conditioners, and no MLS records show window AC for any unit. This consistent absence indicates that window AC is not a feature buyers can expect in this building.

Concrete appears in 19 of 20 listings, making the evidence strong and consistent across multiple agents and the building's MLS history. Remarks generally do not explicitly say "concrete construction," so the conclusion relies primarily on the highly consistent MLS construction-material entry rather than detailed narrative descriptions.

Double-wall construction is not supported by the current evidence. Only 1 of 20 MLS records contains DOUWAL, while the public remarks repeatedly describe the same building without any double-wall reference, indicating the checkbox is likely an outlier or copy-paste error.

Neither the MLS construction materials field nor the remarks suggest hollow-tile construction. This supports concluding that hollow tile is not a primary construction type for this building.

Only 9 of 20 listings identify masonry/stucco, and no public remarks explicitly describe the building as masonry or stucco. The minority MLS entries appear more likely to reflect agent checkbox copying or inconsistency, so the feature is omitted.

Steel frame construction appears in a minority of current MLS records (4 of 20), but none of the public remarks explicitly describe 'steel frame' or 'steel frame construction.' Because the remarks are silent and the checkbox appears in only a small subset of listings, this looks more like weak building-level MLS evidence than strong independent confirmation.

There is minimal and inconsistent MLS indication of slab construction and no textual support in remarks. Given the high-rise context and lack of consistent tagging, it is unlikely this building should be identified with the 'slab' construction feature.

No analysis available

No listings check wood-frame construction and no remarks mention it, which strongly indicates the building is not wood-frame. As a high-rise Waikiki condo, it is almost certainly non-wood structural construction.

Six of 20 listings record ABOGRO in the construction materials field. Multiple independent remarks reference 5th-, 8th-, 10th-, 14th-, 15th-, 17th-, 19th-, and 21st-floor units, as well as penthouses, which is consistent with an above-ground tower, though these descriptions do not directly verify the construction classification.

There is no MLS or remarks evidence of any brick or brick-and-mortar construction. Given the high-rise condo context and complete absence of mentions, brick construction can be ruled out.

There is no MLS or remarks support for single-wall construction, and the building type makes it very unlikely. It can be confidently treated as not single-wall construction.

Public remarks consistently prohibit short-term vacation rentals and establish a minimum rental period of 90 days. This explicitly means short-term rental use is not allowed.

The remarks contain no references to a hotel rental pool, hotel management, Hilton pool, Trump pool, Ritz pool, or similar program. Because STR is not allowed, this feature must also be false.

No listing states that owners must participate in a hotel pool or rental program. Since short-term rentals are not allowed, mandatory hotel-pool participation is necessarily false.

The building clearly contains Fee Simple units: numerous listings call out 'Fee Simple' or 'fee-simple unit', and several emphasize they are 'rarely available' versus the leasehold stock. From the supplied remarks, at least 6–8 of the described listings are explicitly Fee Simple, confirming that FS ownership exists alongside leasehold units.

Leasehold units are widely documented: over 20 listings in the combined remarks reference leasehold status, lease rent, or lease terms, with repeated notes that leases run to 2039 or 2069 and can often be extended (e.g., for $35–45k). Another remark explicitly states there are both Fee Simple units and two lease structures ending in 2039 and 2069, so the building clearly offers both LH and FS, with the majority of listings being leasehold.

The most recent and repeatedly cited lease term ends in 2069. Older listings reference 2039, but the remarks explain that the lease was extended or can be extended to 2069; therefore, 2069 is the applicable latest expiry year.

Public remarks directly confirm VA approval and VA financing availability. This is strong, explicit evidence that the building is VA loan approved.

The remarks were searched for fully insured, full insurance, comprehensive building insurance, fully covered insurance, and walls-in coverage. No qualifying HOA insurance statement was found, so this remains false with medium-low confidence.

Neither remarks nor MLS amenity checkboxes indicate the presence of a building fire sprinkler system; agents repeatedly list amenities like pool, BBQ, security, and storage but never sprinklers. Given this consistent omission and 0/20 FIRSPR entries, it is likely the building does not have a central fire sprinkler system, though this is inferred rather than explicitly stated.

The remarks were searched for FLSE, fire/life safety evaluation, fire-safety certification, life-safety compliance, and passed-fire-inspection language. Nothing confirming or denying this feature was found; under the rules, an unmentioned boolean defaults to false with medium-low confidence.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Ocean views are strongly supported across many listings, including phrases such as "ocean views," "Pacific Ocean," "partial ocean view," and "peek-a-boo ocean views." The feature appears consistently across numerous units and agents rather than being limited to a single copied remark.

Mountain views are supported in 10 of 20 current listings, with explicit phrases such as "mountain views," "majestic mountains," "Koolau Mountains," and "Ko'olau mountain range." The evidence appears across multiple listings and is consistent with the building's established high-confidence view profile.

Diamond Head views are documented in 19 of 20 current listings, including repeated descriptions such as "breathtaking Diamond Head views," "panoramic views of Diamond Head," and "stunning Diamond Head and ocean views." The consistency across the listings strongly confirms this as a building-level offering, even where wording may be reused.

City views are confirmed in 16 of 20 current listings, with key phrases including "stunning city and Diamond Head views," "vibrant cityscape," "Waikiki skyline," and "Honolulu City lights." The feature is supported across multiple listings and agents and should remain included as a building-level view option.

Coastline views are supported by several listings, though fewer than ocean or Diamond Head views. The wording varies from 'coastal view' to references to 'sandy coastlines,' which indicates a real and recurring building feature.

Garden-style views are supported by multiple current listings and many remarks across different agents. While not every listing uses the exact word "garden," several descriptions reference "secret garden," "treetop," "lush parks," "green parks," and "green belt" outlooks, which consistently indicate garden-like views. The evidence appears repeated and not limited to a single agent's copy-paste wording.

None of the many unit descriptions reference a golf course, fairway, or greens, despite frequent detailed descriptions of other views. Combined with 0/20 MLS view descriptors including GOLCOU, this strongly suggests the building does not offer golf course views. This is treated as a correction from the default 'unknown' to 'no' for building-level golf course views.

Marina/harbor views are supported, but less frequently than the ocean or Diamond Head themes. One listing explicitly mentions 'ocean, harbor, and city skyline,' and another references proximity/views to the yacht clubs and marina, which is enough to support the feature at moderate-high confidence.

Sunrise views are less universal but are clearly present in multiple remarks, including "panoramic vistas sunrise rising over the mountain" and "enjoy sunrise ... on the large lanai." The evidence supports including this as a building-level offering for appropriately oriented units, even though it is less common than ocean, Diamond Head, or city views.

Sunset views are clearly referenced in the remarks, including 'sunset cocktails,' 'watching the sunset over world-class views,' and 'enjoy the large lanai for sunsets.' These repeated mentions across multiple listings make sunset exposure a credible building-level selling point.

Across dozens of detailed descriptions emphasizing views of Diamond Head, ocean, parks, mountains, and city lights, there is no reference to any cemetery. Given also that no agents checked the cemetery view box in the MLS, it's reasonable to conclude that cemetery views are not a characteristic of this building.

The listings repeatedly and directly confirm Friday-night fireworks views from private lanais and residences. This is explicit building/unit-view evidence rather than merely proximity to the fireworks location.

No analysis available

Multiple agents describe the building as 'pet-friendly' with clear limits like '2 dogs or 2 cats (max weight 35 lbs each)' across different listings. This repeated, specific language from various units confirms that pets (dogs and cats) are allowed under stated restrictions.

At least 7 listings explicitly mention the feature, including "resident manager," "on-site resident manager," "resident manager, and on-site security," and "building amenities include a manager." The repeated wording appears across multiple listings and agents, strongly confirming that Wailana at Waikiki has an on-site resident manager.

The building is marketed as a residential condo with leasehold/fee-simple ownership and explicit minimum rental periods, not nightly or hotel-style rentals. The consistent absence of any hotel-program language and the presence of minimum-stay rules indicate it is not a condotel.

Ownership is consistently described in condominium terms (fee simple and leasehold with specified lease-end dates and extension fees), not as a cooperative share structure. The lack of any co-op terminology across extensive marketing materials strongly supports that the building is not a co-op.