Wailana at Waikiki

MLS property data is highly consistent with 49 listings showing 1970 as the construction year and only 2 outliers at 1974. With no remarks suggesting another build year, 1970 is adopted as the building’s year built.

Remarks reference high floors and penthouses (e.g., 19th floor just below penthouse, 21st-level penthouse), and MLS unit data for this building includes units up to the 24th floor. In the absence of a stated 'X-story' count, we infer a 24-floor building from the maximum observed floor in MLS.

No listing remarks state how many units are in Wailana at Waikiki, and no trustworthy MLS unit-total data was provided. Because the building unit count is never specified, it cannot be reliably determined from the available information.

Reviewed all public remarks for explicit percentages or clear statements about owner vs. renter mix. Found none. Per the numeric-field rules, do not guess an owner_occupancy percentage without explicit evidence, so the value remains unknown (null) with low confidence.

Searched all public remarks for explicit numeric mentions (e.g., '4 elevators', 'two elevators'). Multiple listings mention elevator access and fob-controlled elevator/entry, but no remark provides a specific number of elevators. Per rules, do not guess a numeric count without an explicit statement.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Multiple agents explicitly state that A/C-related electricity or chiller usage is submetered and billed based on usage, not included in a flat HOA fee. With only 3 of 20 listings checking central A/C in fee-includes, the evidence points to central A/C being available but paid for separately by owners. Thus, maintenance does not truly include central air conditioning service.

MLS checkbox counts list CABTV in 15 of 20 current listings, but none of the public remarks explicitly say 'cable included in HOA.' Remarks instead reference custom fiber-to-the-unit installations. Evidence suggests agent copy/paste of checkboxes rather than consistent building-level cable service included.

High agreement across listings: 17 of 20 MLS records mark OTCOEX. Several remarks note 'Separate metered electric' with 'all other utilities included in HOA fees' or similar phrasing, indicating common-area electricity is treated as an association expense and therefore included.

The building is consistently described as fee simple or leasehold condominium ownership, never as a co-op. No listings mention cooperative taxes, and the COOTAX checkbox is absent across all MLS data. This strongly indicates cooperative taxes are not part of the fees.

At least four different listings clearly say electricity is separately metered and paid by the owner, sometimes specifying that only other utilities are included in the HOA. No listing claims electricity is included in maintenance fees, and the ELECTR checkbox is unused in MLS data. This is strong, consistent evidence that electricity is not included in the maintenance fees.

Listings repeatedly describe electric or induction cooking and focus only on electric utilities, never mentioning gas service. With no MLS entries indicating gas in the HOA and no remarks about gas lines or gas billing, it is very likely that gas is neither provided nor included in the maintenance fees.

HOTWAT is checked in 13 of 20 MLS records and remarks (e.g., 'Separate metered electric, all other utilities included in HOA fees') support that hot water is covered by HOA fees across the building.

INTSER appears in 8 of 20 MLS records, but remarks mention custom fiber-to-unit installs rather than HOA-provided internet and contain no clear 'internet included' statements. Evidence leans toward internet not being included building-wide.

Several listings mention that the building is near the Hawaii and Waikiki Yacht Clubs and the marina, but none state that marina access or boat slip fees are included in the HOA. With no MARINA checkbox usage in MLS, there is strong evidence that marina costs are not part of the maintenance fees. Access appears to be purely location-based, not an included amenity fee.

SEWER is checked in 17 of 20 MLS records and multiple agent remarks (e.g., 'all other utilities included in HOA fees' with electric separately metered) corroborate that sewer is included in HOA/maintenance fees.

WATER appears in 17 of 20 MLS records and remarks such as 'Separate metered electric, all other utilities included in HOA fees' confirm water is generally covered by the association's maintenance fees.

Strong, consistent evidence: numerous public remarks (many of the listings provided) explicitly mention a common BBQ area—examples include "large BBQ area w/sundeck", "BBQ area", and "BBQ deck." Historical MLS checkbox data also showed ~19/20 listings with BBQ. The consistency across many agent remarks indicates the building offers a shared BBQ/grilling facility.

At least a few separate listings expressly note 'surfboard and bicycle storage' or 'storage from bicycles and surfboards' available on the premises, indicating a dedicated common-area facility for bikes. The repeated, specific wording across multiple agents suggests a real, building-level amenity rather than a copy error. Buyers seeking bicycle storage should consider this building as offering that feature.

Agents emphasize that the building is across from Hilton Hawaiian Village and near yacht clubs and beaches, not directly on a marina. The absence of terms like boat dock, slip, or mooring in combination with MLS data indicates the project has no boat dock of its own.

Agents frequently detail parking (secured, covered, guest, rentable) but do not reference any car wash or auto wash area. The complete lack of mentions combined with unchecked MLS data makes it very likely that no car wash amenity exists.

Amenity descriptions focus on pool, BBQ area, recreation area, security, and storage, with no mention of a clubhouse or community center. The complete absence of both textual and MLS evidence strongly indicates there is no clubhouse amenity.

Detailed amenity descriptions never mention concierge or front-desk services, even in higher-end or penthouse listings that highlight many features. With only 2 of 20 MLS records ticking concierge and no textual support, it's very likely the building does not provide concierge service.

Multiple agents note that the building is pet-friendly and allow two dogs or cats, yet none refer to an on-site dog park or dog run. With no textual support and all MLS entries leaving DGPRK unchecked, the building almost certainly lacks a dedicated dog park.

Across all provided remarks, amenities like pool, BBQ, resident manager, and security guards are repeatedly described, but there is no reference to any doorman or lobby attendant service. Combined with DOORMA being unchecked in all MLS entries, this strongly suggests the building does not offer a doorman.

Across numerous remarks, agents repeatedly list amenities such as pool, BBQ area, recreation area, security, and storage but never mention a gym, fitness room, or fitness center. With just 1 of 20 MLS entries checking this box and no textual support, it is very likely the building does not have a shared exercise room.

While the building is described as well-located and secure with good parking, no listing mentions limousine service, a house car, or any complimentary car service that luxury buildings sometimes offer. With no textual or MLS evidence, limousine or house car service can be safely ruled out.

Despite extensive descriptions of building features, no listing refers to a meeting room, conference room, or community room. With just a single MLS checkbox and no supporting narrative, a shared meeting room is unlikely to exist.

The building clearly offers patio/deck amenities: 17 of 20 current MLS listings have the PATDEC/COVPAT checkbox and numerous remarks explicitly reference lanais/balconies (examples include 'huge 226 sq. ft. wrap around lanai', '124 sq. ft. lanai', and 'private lanai'). Evidence is consistent across many agent remarks (not just a single listing) and matches historical MLS data, indicating a strong, multi-listing confirmation of patios/decks.

Agents often highlight proximity to Fort DeRussy Park, Ala Moana Beach Park, and other outdoor spaces, including “views” of parks and jogging paths, but never describe a dedicated jogging or walking path as a building amenity. This context plus 0/20 MLS checkmarks indicates jogging paths are neighborhood features, not on-site building amenities.

Across many listings, amenities like pool, BBQ, recreation area, and security are consistently mentioned, but there is no indication of any kids’ playground or tot lot. The combination of explicit omissions and zero MLS checkmarks strongly suggests there is no playground.

Listings consistently describe outdoor space as lanais or balcony terraces, not yards, and there is no language about a private or fenced yard for any unit. The few extra-large terraces are penthouse-specific and not a general building feature, so buyers should not expect private yard space in this building.

Listings emphasize views, pool, BBQ, and recreation area, but never mention any golf or putting facilities. With no textual or MLS evidence, it is safe to conclude the building does not have a putting green.

Multiple agents describe “amenities such as a pool, recreation area, secured parking” and “a pristine pool, recreation area, and secure parking facilities,” indicating a common rec/amenity area. These consistent remarks across different listings support that the building offers a shared recreation area alongside the pool and BBQ.

Several listings mention a “recreation area” but none describe an indoor recreation or game room, hospitality room, or similar enclosed space. Given just 2/20 MLS checks and lack of explicit confirmation in remarks, a shared recreation room likely does not exist.

Good evidence that the building offers on-site dining/retail: numerous remarks mention 'Island Country Market', 'ABC Store on the ground level', 'deli and sushi bar', and 'on-site dining/retail'. Several independent listings reference the same ground-floor market and deli, supporting that an on-site market/dining option is available in the building.

One penthouse listing highlights a “979 square foot private balcony terrace,” indicating unit-specific outdoor space rather than a common rooftop. The lack of any “rooftop” or “roof deck” references in numerous detailed amenity lists plus unchecked MLS data makes a shared rooftop amenity very unlikely.

Despite many detailed descriptions of amenities, there is no reference to a sauna, steam room, or similar facility. With no textual support and zero MLS checkmarks, the building almost certainly does not have a sauna.

Strong evidence that the building offers storage units/lockers: historic MLS checkbox data indicated 15/20 listings, and numerous current remarks explicitly reference storage (quotes: “two private storage units located just outside your door,” “2 storage lockers,” “storage lockers located just outside unit door”). Mentions appear across multiple agent listings and are consistent with the prior high-confidence checkbox data.

Several public remarks clearly state the building provides surfboard storage (often alongside bicycle storage), indicating high confidence that surfboard storage is available on the premises.

In detailed amenity lists, agents highlight pool, BBQ, recreation area, security, and storage but never reference tennis courts. With all MLS entries leaving TENCOU unchecked and zero textual evidence, it is very likely the building has no tennis court.

Implied but not explicitly confirmed: 17 of 20 current MLS listings list a trash chute in amenities (historically Medium confidence), yet none of the provided public remarks explicitly state "trash chute" or similar. Given the strong prevalence in MLS checkbox data but lack of direct remark confirmation, the feature is likely present (included) with moderate confidence rather than explicit confirmation.

Parking is consistently described as 'secured', 'covered', 'assigned', or 'garage' parking, often with specific stall numbers and levels. No listing advertises valet or valet parking, which would typically be promoted if available, so valet service can be safely ruled out.

Listings consistently describe secure/covered parking and keyed building access but never mention a gated or fenced perimeter, 'gated community,' or similar language. Together with all MLS entries leaving GATED/WALFEN unchecked, this strongly indicates there is no wall or fence forming a perimeter security feature.

Amenity lists consistently include pool and BBQ but never a hot tub, jacuzzi, or spa at the building level. The only whirlpool-related mention is a private in-unit jacuzzi bathtub, which does not qualify as a common building amenity, so a shared whirlpool is very unlikely.

All 20 current MLS listings list a pool amenity and many remarks explicitly state phrases like "Amenities include pool," "refreshing pool," and "heated pool." Evidence is consistent across numerous listings and agents, providing strong confirmation that the building has a shared swimming pool.

At least five separate listings specifically describe a 'heated pool' or 'pool that is heated' as a building amenity, often grouped with BBQ areas and security, indicating this is a common-area feature rather than unit-specific marketing language. Although only 9/20 MLS entries flag HEAPOO, the consistent explicit phrasing in remarks across multiple years and agents strongly supports that the Wailana at Waikiki pool is heated.

I searched all pool descriptions for terms indicating a salt-water system and found none. Pool references describe heated/refreshing pools and BBQ/sundeck areas but do not identify the pool as salt water.

Strong, building-level evidence: 20 of 20 current listings list washer/dryer in the inclusions and many remarks explicitly state 'in-unit washer and dryer', 'washer/dryer in unit', or 'stack washer dryer'. The mentions appear across multiple agent listings (not isolated), indicating the building offers in-unit laundry in at least some units and making this a reliable feature for buyers searching for in-unit laundry.

Across dozens of listings, agents consistently describe building amenities (pool, BBQ, security, storage, surfboard/bike storage, etc.) but never mention a community or shared laundry room. MLS amenities data also shows 0/20 listings checking the community-laundry box. This strong and repeated omission, alongside widespread in-unit laundry, indicates the building likely does not have separate community laundry facilities.

I searched for terms such as 'coin laundry', 'coin-op', 'card operated', 'quarters', and 'paid laundry' and found none. Remarks instead frequently reference in-unit washer/dryer or do not mention laundry payment models.

Searched all public remarks for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', 'floor-by-floor laundry' and found no references. Many listings note in-unit washers/dryers or storage locations, but nothing indicates community laundry on every floor.

Nearly all unit descriptions mention at least one parking stall or space (e.g., “1 parking stall,” “2 parking spaces,” “with covered parking”), and MLS data confirms parking for 20/20 listings. Buyers can expect this building to offer on-site parking with the units.

Multiple listings (at least ~15 separate remarks) explicitly mention assigned or dedicated stalls—phrases include 'one secured and assigned parking space', 'one assigned parking stall (#322)', and 'two dedicated parking spaces'. Mentions appear across many different agent remarks (not isolated to a single copy/paste), supporting high confidence that the building offers assigned parking.

Strong and consistent evidence across listings that the building offers covered parking: numerous remarks state phrases like "one covered, secured parking stall (Level 3)", "secured garage parking", "secured covered parking stall", and "two secured garage parking spots." Coverage appears across many agent listings (20/20 in current MLS data), indicating a building-level amenity rather than isolated unit claims.

Listings consistently describe secured, assigned, or covered parking stalls and additional rentable guest parking, but none explicitly state parking is deeded/owned with the unit. I searched for 'deeded parking', 'deeded stall', and similar phrasing and found no explicit evidence that parking is deeded.

Across all provided remarks, parking is described in detail but never with any reference to EV charging stations. Combined with 0/20 MLS checkboxes for EV charging, this strongly suggests the building does not currently offer dedicated EV charging infrastructure.

There is evidence that extra/guest parking can be rented (daily or monthly) and public parking is available for a fee, but no specific monthly fee amount is provided in the remarks.

Remarks in at least one listing directly reference 'Guest parking stalls & additional covered parking available for daily or monthly rent,' and others describe additional public/paid parking on site. Together with multiple MLS records marking guest parking and prior high confidence, this supports that the building offers guest/visitor parking options.

At least ~12 listings explicitly reference secured access for parking or building entry—quotes include 'secured and assigned parking space', 'fob controlled garage/elevator access', and 'controlled access requiring security fobs for entry and elevator use'. The security descriptions appear across multiple agent remarks (not limited to a single source), giving strong confidence that parking has secured entry/access.

Where two stalls are mentioned (e.g., penthouse units with two spaces), the style is never described as tandem, and the MLS data never flags TANDEM. This strongly indicates tandem parking is not a defined or marketed parking type in this building.

Despite very detailed amenity and parking descriptions, there is no reference to valet or attended parking service in any remark. Combined with the absence of the VALET checkbox in all MLS records, this supports that the building does not offer valet parking.

I searched for terms like 'waitlist', 'waiting list', and 'join waitlist' regarding parking and found no references. Listings describe assigned/secured parking and rentable guest parking but do not mention a waitlist system.

Several independent listings mention secure elevator access, using phrases like 'security fobs for entry and elevator use', 'fob controlled garage/elevator access', and 'keyed entry, elevator & parking garage'. This consistent language across different agents confirms that elevator access is controlled by key or fob.

Several listings explicitly describe fob/keycard controlled access for building entry and elevators, giving high confidence that the building uses card/fob electronic access systems.

Strong evidence that Wailana at Waikiki provides on-site security: the MLS amenities checkbox lists SECGUA on 15 of 20 listings and at least 8 separate public remarks explicitly mention security features. Representative quotes include "Security guard & on-site cameras", "on-site security", "24/7 security", and "resident manager, and security," indicating consistent confirmation across multiple agents rather than isolated copy/paste.

I searched for phrases indicating a roving or patrol security service and found none. While the building repeatedly references security guards, on-site security, and 24/7 security, there is no explicit statement that a security patrol or roving patrol service operates.

Remarks from at least one listing state 'Security guard & on-site cameras', directly confirming video surveillance in the building. Although no agents checked the SECSYS box, the explicit reference to on-site cameras is strong evidence that video security exists.

High-confidence evidence the building offers central air. Historical MLS checkboxes indicated central AC on the majority of units (17/20 unit_features; 19/20 inclusions), and numerous current remarks explicitly state "central AC" or "central air" (for example: "Central AC unit was replaced in 2022", "central air conditioning", "central A/C", "chiller for A/C"). This confirmation appears across multiple agent listings and describes the system as a building-level feature accessible to units.

Across a large number of listings, agents consistently describe central A/C and a building chiller system but never mention split, ductless, or mini-split air conditioning in any unit. With 0/20 MLS inclusions for split AC and no textual evidence, split AC systems do not appear to be a feature offered in this building’s units.

Listings repeatedly market central A/C and chiller-based cooling but never reference window or wall air conditioners, and no MLS records show window AC for any unit. This consistent absence indicates that window AC is not a feature buyers can expect in this building.

Strong evidence the building is concrete: 19 of 20 current MLS records list CONCRE in construction materials and prior confidence was High. While most public remarks focus on views and amenities, multiple unit descriptions refer to concrete-related finishes (e.g., "concrete painted floors") and the overall high-rise character is consistent with reinforced concrete construction across listings.

Double-wall construction is not indicated anywhere in MLS data or remarks for this high-rise condo. The absence of any mention supports concluding that double-wall construction is not a defining feature.

Neither the MLS construction materials field nor the remarks suggest hollow-tile construction. This supports concluding that hollow tile is not a primary construction type for this building.

Mixed evidence for masonry/stucco: 9 of 20 current MLS listings check MASSTU and historical confidence was Medium, but no public remarks explicitly state "masonry" or "stucco." The MLS checkbox presence across multiple listings supports inclusion for buyers searching for masonry/stucco, but the absence of explicit remarks lowers confidence and suggests some agent copy/paste may be present.

MLS data overwhelmingly points to concrete construction, with just a small minority (2 of 20) inconsistently checking steel frame and no textual support in remarks. Multiple independent descriptions emphasize the building as a standard concrete high-rise with no mention of a steel frame system, so steel frame construction is very unlikely.

There is minimal and inconsistent MLS indication of slab construction and no textual support in remarks. Given the high-rise context and lack of consistent tagging, it is unlikely this building should be identified with the 'slab' construction feature.

No analysis available

No listings check wood-frame construction and no remarks mention it, which strongly indicates the building is not wood-frame. As a high-rise Waikiki condo, it is almost certainly non-wood structural construction.

Multiple listings (many units reference specific floor levels and penthouse/high-floor positions such as 7th, 11th, 17th, 19th and 21st floors) and repeated references to wrap-around lanais and panoramic views indicate above-ground multi-story construction. While fewer current MLS checkboxes list ABOGRO, the remarks across many agents consistently imply an above-ground high-rise building, supporting moderate-to-high confidence.

There is no MLS or remarks evidence of any brick or brick-and-mortar construction. Given the high-rise condo context and complete absence of mentions, brick construction can be ruled out.

There is no MLS or remarks support for single-wall construction, and the building type makes it very unlikely. It can be confidently treated as not single-wall construction.

Public remarks consistently state that short-term/vacation rentals are prohibited and specify minimum rental periods (90 days or 6 months), so short-term rentals are not allowed.

Because short-term rentals are not permitted and there are no remarks referencing a hotel rental pool or hotel-managed rental program, the building does not participate in a hotel rental pool.

With short-term rentals prohibited and no evidence of any hotel rental-pool program in the remarks, there is no mandatory hotel pool participation for units.

The building clearly contains Fee Simple units: numerous listings call out 'Fee Simple' or 'fee-simple unit', and several emphasize they are 'rarely available' versus the leasehold stock. From the supplied remarks, at least 6–8 of the described listings are explicitly Fee Simple, confirming that FS ownership exists alongside leasehold units.

Leasehold units are widely documented: over 20 listings in the combined remarks reference leasehold status, lease rent, or lease terms, with repeated notes that leases run to 2039 or 2069 and can often be extended (e.g., for $35–45k). Another remark explicitly states there are both Fee Simple units and two lease structures ending in 2039 and 2069, so the building clearly offers both LH and FS, with the majority of listings being leasehold.

Several remarks explicitly state the ground lease has been extended to 2069; when older mentions (2039) appear, the listings indicate extension or option to extend to 2069, so the most recent expiry is 2069.

Public remarks explicitly identify the building as VA-approved and reference a VA-assumable loan. I searched the remarks for phrases such as 'VA approved', 'VA financing', and 'VA loans' and found explicit mentions.

Searched all remarks for insurance coverage phrases (e.g., 'fully insured', 'walls-in coverage', 'comprehensive building insurance'). No listings state the HOA fully insures the building, so the feature is set to false with medium confidence due to lack of explicit evidence.

Neither remarks nor MLS amenity checkboxes indicate the presence of a building fire sprinkler system; agents repeatedly list amenities like pool, BBQ, security, and storage but never sprinklers. Given this consistent omission and 0/20 FIRSPR entries, it is likely the building does not have a central fire sprinkler system, though this is inferred rather than explicitly stated.

Searched for language indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation (FLSE) or passed fire inspection. None of the listings include such statements, so in the absence of explicit mentions the feature is set to false with medium confidence (absence = likely doesn't exist).

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Numerous listing remarks explicitly reference ocean or partial ocean views (phrases like "partial ocean views", "Pacific ocean", "ocean and Diamond Head Views"). These mentions appear across many agents' listings and on multiple floor levels (e.g., 10th, 14th, 17th, 21st floors), supporting a strong building-level offering of ocean-view units.

Multiple listings explicitly mention mountain or Ko'olau range views (phrases like "Ko'olau Mountains", "mountains", "sunrise rising over the mountain"), particularly for higher-floor units, indicating the building offers units with mountain views.

Diamond Head is explicitly mentioned in a very large number of listing remarks (phrases like "Diamond Head views", "mesmerizing Diamond Head", "stunning city and Diamond Head views"), appearing consistently across listings and floor levels, which strongly supports including view_diamond_head as a building feature.

Many listings mention city/downtown/cityscape views (e.g., "city views", "city skyline", "All of Waikiki with its breathtaking views"). These references appear across multiple agent remarks and unit levels, indicating the building offers city-facing view units.

Multiple listings reference coastal or shoreline-type views (examples: "coastal view", "coastline", "ocean and coastline"), along with repeated ocean and park vantage descriptions, indicating the building offers units with coastline-facing vistas.

Many listing remarks reference views of Fort DeRussy Park, treetop or landscaped outlooks (phrases like "overlooking Fort DeRussy Park", "treetop outlook", "park and city views"). These consistent references across multiple listings indicate the building offers garden/park-facing view units.

None of the many unit descriptions reference a golf course, fairway, or greens, despite frequent detailed descriptions of other views. Combined with 0/20 MLS view descriptors including GOLCOU, this strongly suggests the building does not offer golf course views. This is treated as a correction from the default 'unknown' to 'no' for building-level golf course views.

One listing clearly advertises 'stunning views of the ocean, harbor, and city skyline', which meets the criteria for a marina/harbor view. Other remarks emphasize proximity to the Hilton Hawaiian Village, beaches, and yacht clubs, consistent with that sightline. This shows that at least some units enjoy harbor/marina views that buyers may seek.

At least one penthouse/high-floor listing explicitly mentions sunrise views ("sunrise rising over the mountain") and several listings reference morning light/eastern exposure or enjoying morning coffee on the lanai, supporting that some units offer sunrise-facing views.

Well over 5 listings highlight evening/sunset experiences: 'sunset cocktails overlooking amazing views of Diamond Head', 'watching the sunset over world-class views', 'breathtaking sunsets of Oahu's west side', and 'Friday night fireworks' from the lanai. These show that many units have strong western exposure with sunset and fireworks views, making sunset a key selling point for the building.

Across dozens of detailed descriptions emphasizing views of Diamond Head, ocean, parks, mountains, and city lights, there is no reference to any cemetery. Given also that no agents checked the cemetery view box in the MLS, it's reasonable to conclude that cemetery views are not a characteristic of this building.

Several public remarks explicitly state that residents can watch the Hilton Hawaiian Village Friday-night fireworks from their lanai/units. Multiple listings reference 'Friday night fireworks' or 'watch the fireworks from your lanai,' supporting a strong confidence that the building offers fireworks views.

No analysis available

Multiple agents describe the building as 'pet-friendly' with clear limits like '2 dogs or 2 cats (max weight 35 lbs each)' across different listings. This repeated, specific language from various units confirms that pets (dogs and cats) are allowed under stated restrictions.

MLS checkbox data indicates RESMAN in 10 of 20 listings. Several public remarks explicitly state 'resident manager' or similar (quotes: 'resident manager, and security'; 'resident manager, fob controlled garage/elevator access'), and other listings reference on-site security/management. Evidence is consistent across multiple agents/listings and aligns with historical high confidence, so the building is reported to have an on-site resident manager.

The building is marketed as a residential condo with leasehold/fee-simple ownership and explicit minimum rental periods, not nightly or hotel-style rentals. The consistent absence of any hotel-program language and the presence of minimum-stay rules indicate it is not a condotel.

Ownership is consistently described in condominium terms (fee simple and leasehold with specified lease-end dates and extension fees), not as a cooperative share structure. The lack of any co-op terminology across extensive marketing materials strongly supports that the building is not a co-op.