Wailana at Waikiki

MLS property data is highly consistent with 49 listings showing 1970 as the construction year and only 2 outliers at 1974. With no remarks suggesting another build year, 1970 is adopted as the building’s year built.

Remarks reference high floors and penthouses (e.g., 19th floor just below penthouse, 21st-level penthouse), and MLS unit data for this building includes units up to the 24th floor. In the absence of a stated 'X-story' count, we infer a 24-floor building from the maximum observed floor in MLS.

No listing remarks state how many units are in Wailana at Waikiki, and no trustworthy MLS unit-total data was provided. Because the building unit count is never specified, it cannot be reliably determined from the available information.

I looked for building-level ownership mix disclosures such as "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or similar statements. The remarks mention many unit owners, sellers, and residents, but do not provide an actual occupancy percentage. Since there is no explicit figure, the owner-occupancy rate is unknown.

I searched the remarks for an explicit elevator count because this field must come from listing language, not inference. The listings confirm the building has elevators, but none state how many. Without a count, the number of elevators remains unknown.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Central A/C does not appear to be included in maintenance fees. While many listings mention central AC as a unit feature, the remarks consistently describe AC power/chiller as separately metered or charged by usage, which is inconsistent with HOA-included central air.

Cable TV/service inclusion is strongly supported at Wailana at Waikiki. The current MLS pattern is very strong (18 of 20 listings), and the remarks directly confirm it in multiple places, including 'HOA incls Cable/Internet' and 'Wifi/TV Included.'

Common-area electricity appears to be included at the building level. The MLS pattern is highly consistent (18 of 20 listings), and while remarks do not always spell out 'common electric,' they repeatedly reference the shared building areas and amenities, supporting the inclusion.

The building is consistently described as fee simple or leasehold condominium ownership, never as a co-op. No listings mention cooperative taxes, and the COOTAX checkbox is absent across all MLS data. This strongly indicates cooperative taxes are not part of the fees.

Electricity is not supported as an included fee item here. Several listings say electricity is separately metered, sub-metered, or billed based on usage, and the MLS shows only 1 of 20 listings with ELECTR. That combination strongly indicates the feature should be corrected to false.

Listings repeatedly describe electric or induction cooking and focus only on electric utilities, never mentioning gas service. With no MLS entries indicating gas in the HOA and no remarks about gas lines or gas billing, it is very likely that gas is neither provided nor included in the maintenance fees.

Hot water appears to be included in the building’s maintenance fees. The current MLS history shows HOTWAT in 15 of 20 listings, which is strong consistency across listings/agents. The remarks do not explicitly mention hot water, but there is also no evidence suggesting the feature was removed.

Internet inclusion is well supported. Multiple remarks explicitly mention internet/WiFi being included, and the MLS history shows INTSER in a majority of listings, suggesting this is a real building-level benefit rather than a one-off entry.

Several listings mention that the building is near the Hawaii and Waikiki Yacht Clubs and the marina, but none state that marina access or boat slip fees are included in the HOA. With no MARINA checkbox usage in MLS, there is strong evidence that marina costs are not part of the maintenance fees. Access appears to be purely location-based, not an included amenity fee.

Sewer is clearly included in the maintenance fee. This is backed by a strong MLS pattern (17 of 20 listings) and direct language in the remarks, including an explicit statement that the maintenance fee covers 'water, sewer, and building amenities.'

Water inclusion is one of the clearest building features here. The current MLS data shows WATER in 18 of 20 listings, and at least one remark explicitly says the maintenance fee "covers water, sewer," which aligns with the checkbox data. This is highly consistent across the listings and appears to be reliable rather than copy-paste noise.

BBQ is strongly supported as a shared building amenity. Multiple listings explicitly mention 'BBQ area,' 'large BBQ area w/sundeck,' and 'BBQ deck,' and the pattern appears consistent across many agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error. This is reinforced by the high MLS frequency (19/20).

At least a few separate listings expressly note 'surfboard and bicycle storage' or 'storage from bicycles and surfboards' available on the premises, indicating a dedicated common-area facility for bikes. The repeated, specific wording across multiple agents suggests a real, building-level amenity rather than a copy error. Buyers seeking bicycle storage should consider this building as offering that feature.

Agents emphasize that the building is across from Hilton Hawaiian Village and near yacht clubs and beaches, not directly on a marina. The absence of terms like boat dock, slip, or mooring in combination with MLS data indicates the project has no boat dock of its own.

There is no meaningful support for a car wash facility. Across the provided remarks, agents discuss parking, storage, security, and building amenities, but never a car wash or auto wash area. With only 1 of 20 MLS listings checking the box and no remark support, this is best corrected to false.

Amenity descriptions focus on pool, BBQ area, recreation area, security, and storage, with no mention of a clubhouse or community center. The complete absence of both textual and MLS evidence strongly indicates there is no clubhouse amenity.

Detailed amenity descriptions never mention concierge or front-desk services, even in higher-end or penthouse listings that highlight many features. With only 2 of 20 MLS records ticking concierge and no textual support, it's very likely the building does not provide concierge service.

Multiple agents note that the building is pet-friendly and allow two dogs or cats, yet none refer to an on-site dog park or dog run. With no textual support and all MLS entries leaving DGPRK unchecked, the building almost certainly lacks a dedicated dog park.

Across all provided remarks, amenities like pool, BBQ, resident manager, and security guards are repeatedly described, but there is no reference to any doorman or lobby attendant service. Combined with DOORMA being unchecked in all MLS entries, this strongly suggests the building does not offer a doorman.

Across numerous remarks, agents repeatedly list amenities such as pool, BBQ area, recreation area, security, and storage but never mention a gym, fitness room, or fitness center. With just 1 of 20 MLS entries checking this box and no textual support, it is very likely the building does not have a shared exercise room.

While the building is described as well-located and secure with good parking, no listing mentions limousine service, a house car, or any complimentary car service that luxury buildings sometimes offer. With no textual or MLS evidence, limousine or house car service can be safely ruled out.

Despite extensive descriptions of building features, no listing refers to a meeting room, conference room, or community room. With just a single MLS checkbox and no supporting narrative, a shared meeting room is unlikely to exist.

Strong building-level support for patio/deck amenities across the remarks. Well over 20 listings mention outdoor space, most commonly 'lanai' or 'large lanai,' with several also saying 'covered patio,' 'balcony,' or 'patio/deck,' which suggests this is a consistent feature rather than a one-off agent description.

Agents often highlight proximity to Fort DeRussy Park, Ala Moana Beach Park, and other outdoor spaces, including “views” of parks and jogging paths, but never describe a dedicated jogging or walking path as a building amenity. This context plus 0/20 MLS checkmarks indicates jogging paths are neighborhood features, not on-site building amenities.

Across many listings, amenities like pool, BBQ, recreation area, and security are consistently mentioned, but there is no indication of any kids’ playground or tot lot. The combination of explicit omissions and zero MLS checkmarks strongly suggests there is no playground.

Listings consistently describe outdoor space as lanais or balcony terraces, not yards, and there is no language about a private or fenced yard for any unit. The few extra-large terraces are penthouse-specific and not a general building feature, so buyers should not expect private yard space in this building.

Listings emphasize views, pool, BBQ, and recreation area, but never mention any golf or putting facilities. With no textual or MLS evidence, it is safe to conclude the building does not have a putting green.

There is credible evidence for a shared recreation area, though it is less consistently advertised than BBQ. One listing explicitly says the building offers 'a pool, recreation area,' and another references amenity areas like a 'recreation area' alongside secured parking. Because the MLS signal is only present in a subset of listings, confidence is solid but not as high as BBQ.

No listing remarks describe a recreation room, rec room, game room, or entertainment room. Mentions that might sound related are actually about a recreation area or other shared outdoor amenities, so this feature does not appear to be present.

Strong evidence supports restaurant/dining retail in the building. Across many listings, agents mention "on-site dining/retail," "ground floor" food options, and the "Island Country Market" or "ABC Store" with "deli and sushi bar." The repeated phrasing across multiple listings suggests this is a real shared building amenity, not just copy-paste noise.

One penthouse listing highlights a “979 square foot private balcony terrace,” indicating unit-specific outdoor space rather than a common rooftop. The lack of any “rooftop” or “roof deck” references in numerous detailed amenity lists plus unchecked MLS data makes a shared rooftop amenity very unlikely.

Despite many detailed descriptions of amenities, there is no reference to a sauna, steam room, or similar facility. With no textual support and zero MLS checkmarks, the building almost certainly does not have a sauna.

There is overwhelming evidence that Wailana at Waikiki offers storage units/lockers. Across the current remarks, well over a dozen listings mention storage in some form, including explicit phrases such as "2 storage units outside the entryway," "deeded storage units," "storage lockers just outside unit door," and "extra storage from the Association." The consistency across many different listings suggests this is a real building feature rather than copied MLS checkbox noise.

The remarks directly confirm surfboard storage facilities. Multiple listings mention surfboard storage, often alongside bicycle storage, which is strong evidence for this amenity.

In detailed amenity lists, agents highlight pool, BBQ, recreation area, security, and storage but never reference tennis courts. With all MLS entries leaving TENCOU unchecked and zero textual evidence, it is very likely the building has no tennis court.

Trash chute appears to be a real building feature based on MLS history, with 17 of 20 listings showing TRACHU in amenities. None of the public remarks explicitly call it out, which suggests agents may be copying amenity data rather than describing it in remarks, but the repeated MLS pattern is still strong enough to keep this as a building feature.

Parking is consistently described as 'secured', 'covered', 'assigned', or 'garage' parking, often with specific stall numbers and levels. No listing advertises valet or valet parking, which would typically be promoted if available, so valet service can be safely ruled out.

Listings consistently describe secure/covered parking and keyed building access but never mention a gated or fenced perimeter, 'gated community,' or similar language. Together with all MLS entries leaving GATED/WALFEN unchecked, this strongly indicates there is no wall or fence forming a perimeter security feature.

Amenity lists consistently include pool and BBQ but never a hot tub, jacuzzi, or spa at the building level. The only whirlpool-related mention is a private in-unit jacuzzi bathtub, which does not qualify as a common building amenity, so a shared whirlpool is very unlikely.

Pool is strongly confirmed for Wailana at Waikiki. It is explicitly mentioned in many remarks across numerous listings from different agents, including 'swimming pool,' 'heated pool,' 'refreshing pool,' and 'pool area.' The consistency across listings suggests this is a real shared building amenity rather than copied checkbox data.

Heated pool is supported by multiple current listings and remarks. Several listings explicitly say "heated pool" or "a pool that is heated," which suggests the amenity is real and recurring rather than a copy-paste error.

I reviewed all pool references for salt-water wording. The building clearly has a pool, but the remarks never describe it as saltwater, so there is no evidence to mark it as a salt pool.

This feature is overwhelmingly supported across the building. In the current remarks, many listings explicitly mention in-unit laundry, including phrases such as "In-unit washer/dryer," "washer and dryer in unit," "stack washer dryer in unit," and "full size washer/dryer." The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents and is strong enough to confirm the building offers in-unit laundry in at least some units.

Across dozens of listings, agents consistently describe building amenities (pool, BBQ, security, storage, surfboard/bike storage, etc.) but never mention a community or shared laundry room. MLS amenities data also shows 0/20 listings checking the community-laundry box. This strong and repeated omission, alongside widespread in-unit laundry, indicates the building likely does not have separate community laundry facilities.

I looked for paid-laundry language such as coin laundry, coin-op, card-operated machines, or laundry fees. The public remarks do not describe any shared laundry system at all, only in-unit washer/dryer references.

I searched the remarks for wording like "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," and similar building-wide laundry references. The listings only mention in-unit washer/dryer, which does not support community laundry on every floor.

Nearly all unit descriptions mention at least one parking stall or space (e.g., “1 parking stall,” “2 parking spaces,” “with covered parking”), and MLS data confirms parking for 20/20 listings. Buyers can expect this building to offer on-site parking with the units.

Assigned/reserved parking is strongly supported across many listings and multiple agents. Current remarks repeatedly mention explicit variants such as "secured and assigned parking space," "covered assigned parking," and "deeded parking," so this appears to be a genuine building feature rather than copy-paste noise.

Covered parking is clearly present at the building and is mentioned across numerous listings. The remarks use multiple explicit forms—"covered parking," "secured covered parking," "garage parking," and "covered, secured parking stall"—which makes the evidence very strong and consistent.

I searched for language such as deeded parking, owned stall, parking included in deed, or parking stall included, but found none. The listings only describe parking as assigned, secured, or covered, so deeded parking is not supported by the remarks.

Across all provided remarks, parking is described in detail but never with any reference to EV charging stations. Combined with 0/20 MLS checkboxes for EV charging, this strongly suggests the building does not currently offer dedicated EV charging infrastructure.

I looked for explicit monthly parking charge language such as parking fee, parking rental, or additional parking cost. The remarks mention a fee for additional public parking and general HOA/lease costs, but not a specific monthly fee for the unit's parking space, so this remains unknown.

Guest parking appears to be available, though mentioned less often than assigned or covered parking. One listing explicitly notes 'Guest parking stalls & additional covered parking available for daily or monthly rent,' which is strong direct evidence, and the historical MLS data also shows guest parking in a meaningful subset of listings. The feature looks real at the building level, but not as universally or consistently advertised as covered parking.

There is strong evidence that parking has secured entry or controlled access. Listings mention 'secured parking,' 'controlled access requiring security fobs for entry and elevator use,' 'fob controlled garage/elevator access,' and 'on-site security,' indicating secure access rather than ordinary open parking. This is consistent across numerous remarks and does not look like a one-off agent error.

Where two stalls are mentioned (e.g., penthouse units with two spaces), the style is never described as tandem, and the MLS data never flags TANDEM. This strongly indicates tandem parking is not a defined or marketed parking type in this building.

Despite very detailed amenity and parking descriptions, there is no reference to valet or attended parking service in any remark. Combined with the absence of the VALET checkbox in all MLS records, this supports that the building does not offer valet parking.

I searched for parking waitlist, waiting list, or join-waitlist language and found nothing. The remarks instead describe available assigned, secured, or covered parking, so there is no evidence of a waitlist system.

Several independent listings mention secure elevator access, using phrases like 'security fobs for entry and elevator use', 'fob controlled garage/elevator access', and 'keyed entry, elevator & parking garage'. This consistent language across different agents confirms that elevator access is controlled by key or fob.

The listings strongly support card/fob access security. Multiple remarks describe controlled entry with security fobs and secured access to the garage and elevators, which is direct evidence of a card/fob system.

Security guard/service appears to be a real building feature at Wailana at Waikiki. Multiple current listings explicitly mention it, including phrases such as 'security guard & on-site cameras,' '24/7 security,' 'on-site security,' and 'fob controlled garage/elevator access,' which strongly supports the MLS amenity. The evidence is consistent across many remarks and does not look like a one-off copy-paste error.

I searched for explicit patrol wording such as "security patrol," "patrolled building," or "roving security." The remarks support a secured building with guards/on-site security, but they do not specifically confirm patrol service.

Remarks from at least one listing state 'Security guard & on-site cameras', directly confirming video surveillance in the building. Although no agents checked the SECSYS box, the explicit reference to on-site cameras is strong evidence that video security exists.

Central air conditioning is strongly confirmed for Wailana at Waikiki. It is mentioned explicitly in many listings across multiple agents, including phrases like "central AC," "central air conditioning," "central A/C," and "HVAC," with several remarks noting a replaced or new AC unit. The consistency across remarks looks like genuine building-wide feature evidence, not just checkbox copy-paste.

Across a large number of listings, agents consistently describe central A/C and a building chiller system but never mention split, ductless, or mini-split air conditioning in any unit. With 0/20 MLS inclusions for split AC and no textual evidence, split AC systems do not appear to be a feature offered in this building’s units.

Listings repeatedly market central A/C and chiller-based cooling but never reference window or wall air conditioners, and no MLS records show window AC for any unit. This consistent absence indicates that window AC is not a feature buyers can expect in this building.

Concrete construction is strongly supported by the building-level MLS history: 19 of 20 listings show CONCRE in construction_materials. The current public remarks do not explicitly say 'concrete,' but they are fully consistent with a large high-rise condo where the MLS pattern appears reliable and repeated across many listings.

Double-wall construction is not supported by the current evidence. Only 1 of 20 MLS records contains DOUWAL, while the public remarks repeatedly describe the same building without any double-wall reference, indicating the checkbox is likely an outlier or copy-paste error.

Neither the MLS construction materials field nor the remarks suggest hollow-tile construction. This supports concluding that hollow tile is not a primary construction type for this building.

Masonry/stucco appears in a minority of current MLS entries (10 of 20). None of the public remarks explicitly describe the building as masonry or stucco, so the evidence is moderate rather than strong and may reflect agent-entered MLS data more than verified marketing language.

Steel frame construction appears in a minority of current MLS records (4 of 20), but none of the public remarks explicitly describe 'steel frame' or 'steel frame construction.' Because the remarks are silent and the checkbox appears in only a small subset of listings, this looks more like weak building-level MLS evidence than strong independent confirmation.

There is minimal and inconsistent MLS indication of slab construction and no textual support in remarks. Given the high-rise context and lack of consistent tagging, it is unlikely this building should be identified with the 'slab' construction feature.

No analysis available

No listings check wood-frame construction and no remarks mention it, which strongly indicates the building is not wood-frame. As a high-rise Waikiki condo, it is almost certainly non-wood structural construction.

Some listings reference upper-floor or penthouse units, but that is not evidence that the building itself is an above-ground construction type. With only 5/20 current MLS records checking ABOGRO and no explicit remarks supporting it, this appears to be an unverified MLS data point.

There is no MLS or remarks evidence of any brick or brick-and-mortar construction. Given the high-rise condo context and complete absence of mentions, brick construction can be ruled out.

There is no MLS or remarks support for single-wall construction, and the building type makes it very unlikely. It can be confidently treated as not single-wall construction.

The listings clearly prohibit short-term rentals and repeatedly reference 90-day minimum or longer rental rules. That is direct evidence that STR is not allowed in this building.

I searched for hotel rental pool, managed-by-hotel, or branded pool language such as Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, but found none. Since short-term rentals are explicitly prohibited, this must also be false.

I looked for language indicating required participation, cannot opt out, or mandatory hotel pool membership, but found nothing. Because the building does not allow short-term rentals, a mandatory rental pool is not supported and is false.

The building clearly contains Fee Simple units: numerous listings call out 'Fee Simple' or 'fee-simple unit', and several emphasize they are 'rarely available' versus the leasehold stock. From the supplied remarks, at least 6–8 of the described listings are explicitly Fee Simple, confirming that FS ownership exists alongside leasehold units.

Leasehold units are widely documented: over 20 listings in the combined remarks reference leasehold status, lease rent, or lease terms, with repeated notes that leases run to 2039 or 2069 and can often be extended (e.g., for $35–45k). Another remark explicitly states there are both Fee Simple units and two lease structures ending in 2039 and 2069, so the building clearly offers both LH and FS, with the majority of listings being leasehold.

The lease expiry year is consistently stated as 2069 across many listings, and newer remarks supersede older 2039 references. The most recent/extended lease date is therefore 2069.

Public remarks explicitly confirm VA eligibility, including a direct VA-approved statement and a VA assumable loan reference. This is strong, repeated evidence, so the feature is set to true with very high confidence.

I searched the remarks for HOA insurance disclosures such as fully insured, full insurance, walls-in coverage, or similar wording. The only insurance reference was to buyer-side HO6 condo insurance, which does not indicate the building is fully insured by the HOA. There is no evidence in the remarks to support a true value.

Neither remarks nor MLS amenity checkboxes indicate the presence of a building fire sprinkler system; agents repeatedly list amenities like pool, BBQ, security, and storage but never sprinklers. Given this consistent omission and 0/20 FIRSPR entries, it is likely the building does not have a central fire sprinkler system, though this is inferred rather than explicitly stated.

I looked through the remarks for language indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation or similar inspection status. Nothing in the listings references FLSE, fire safety certification, or any passed fire inspection. Based on the remarks provided, there is no evidence to mark this as true.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Ocean views are clearly supported at the building level. Roughly 13 listings explicitly mention 'ocean views,' 'partial ocean view,' 'Pacific Ocean,' or 'peak of the ocean,' and the remarks appear consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy/paste. This is a strong, recurring feature for Wailana at Waikiki.

Mountain views are well supported and repeatedly described in the remarks. Multiple listings mention 'mountains,' 'Ko'olau mountain range,' 'mountain views,' and 'sunrise rising over the mountain,' confirming this as a real building-level view option. The evidence is consistent across several listings and agents.

Diamond Head views are one of the most consistent features in the listings. Nearly every remark references 'Diamond Head view,' 'views of Diamond Head,' 'DH view,' or similar phrasing, showing this is a dominant and reliable building feature. The volume and consistency strongly suggest this is not just MLS copy/paste error.

City views are strongly supported by both MLS trend and listing remarks. Many units mention 'city views,' 'cityscape,' 'Waikiki town,' or 'Honolulu City lights,' often alongside ocean or Diamond Head views. This indicates the building offers city-facing units as a recurring feature.

Coastline views are supported by several listings, though fewer than ocean or Diamond Head views. The wording varies from 'coastal view' to references to 'sandy coastlines,' which indicates a real and recurring building feature.

Garden-style views are supported by multiple current listings and many remarks across different agents. While not every listing uses the exact word "garden," several descriptions reference "secret garden," "treetop," "lush parks," "green parks," and "green belt" outlooks, which consistently indicate garden-like views. The evidence appears repeated and not limited to a single agent's copy-paste wording.

None of the many unit descriptions reference a golf course, fairway, or greens, despite frequent detailed descriptions of other views. Combined with 0/20 MLS view descriptors including GOLCOU, this strongly suggests the building does not offer golf course views. This is treated as a correction from the default 'unknown' to 'no' for building-level golf course views.

Marina/harbor views are supported, but less frequently than the ocean or Diamond Head themes. One listing explicitly mentions 'ocean, harbor, and city skyline,' and another references proximity/views to the yacht clubs and marina, which is enough to support the feature at moderate-high confidence.

Sunrise views are present but less common than the other view types. A number of listings reference 'morning coffee,' 'sunrise views,' 'sunrise rising over the mountain,' and eastern or morning-facing exposure, supporting this as a legitimate building feature for some units. The evidence is moderate-to-strong and consistent with some unit orientations.

Sunset views are clearly referenced in the remarks, including 'sunset cocktails,' 'watching the sunset over world-class views,' and 'enjoy the large lanai for sunsets.' These repeated mentions across multiple listings make sunset exposure a credible building-level selling point.

Across dozens of detailed descriptions emphasizing views of Diamond Head, ocean, parks, mountains, and city lights, there is no reference to any cemetery. Given also that no agents checked the cemetery view box in the MLS, it's reasonable to conclude that cemetery views are not a characteristic of this building.

The remarks repeatedly and directly confirm fireworks views from units and lanais in the building. This is strong, consistent evidence that residents can see the Friday night fireworks from the property.

No analysis available

Multiple agents describe the building as 'pet-friendly' with clear limits like '2 dogs or 2 cats (max weight 35 lbs each)' across different listings. This repeated, specific language from various units confirms that pets (dogs and cats) are allowed under stated restrictions.

Strong evidence that Wailana at Waikiki has an on-site resident manager. At least 2 current remarks explicitly say "resident manager" or "manager," and the MLS amenity data still shows RESMAN in 11/20 listings. The repeated mention across separate listings suggests this is a real building feature rather than a one-off copy-paste error.

The building is marketed as a residential condo with leasehold/fee-simple ownership and explicit minimum rental periods, not nightly or hotel-style rentals. The consistent absence of any hotel-program language and the presence of minimum-stay rules indicate it is not a condotel.

Ownership is consistently described in condominium terms (fee simple and leasehold with specified lease-end dates and extension fees), not as a cooperative share structure. The lack of any co-op terminology across extensive marketing materials strongly supports that the building is not a co-op.