Waikiki Shore
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Waikiki Shore
Building Overview
Waikiki Shore in Waikiki — 15-story concrete building with ocean and sunset views; amenities include a pool and concierge.
About Waikiki Shore
According to available records, Waikiki Shore is a 15-floor concrete residential building in the Central Waikiki neighborhood built in 1960. The property contains 168 units and has two elevators.
Based on MLS data, on-site amenities include a pool, BBQ area, concierge services, and a security guard. Units report ocean, mountain, and sunset views and use split or window air-conditioning.
Additional details from MLS: parking is available (covered and assigned) with guest parking; pets are not allowed; short-term rentals are permitted. Management is handled by Hawaiian Properties, Ltd. This summary is based on MLS data — buyers should verify all building features, policies, and fees with the listing agent or management company.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy language like "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied." The remarks instead emphasize short-term rental activity and even mention high occupancy in a rental context, so the current owner-occupancy value is kept because there is no direct contrary evidence.
The listings confirm the building has elevator service and that the elevators were recently upgraded/replaced. However, none of the remarks specify how many elevators there are, so the current value of 2 is retained with low confidence. I searched for explicit counts like "2 elevators," "4 elevators," or "multiple elevators" and found only generic elevator references.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV inclusion is strongly supported. Multiple remarks explicitly mention the cable charge being part of the maintenance fee, and the current MLS data shows CABTV in 16 of 20 listings. This looks like a consistent building-level inclusion rather than a one-off agent error.
MLS data shows OTCOEX checked in 12 of 20 current records. Remarks reference low, itemized maintenance fees repeatedly (implying building-covered common services), but no listings explicitly state 'common area electricity included.' Included with moderate confidence based on MLS prevalence and implied remarks.
No analysis available
There is no meaningful support in the public remarks for electricity being included in the association fee. With only 1 of 20 current MLS records showing ELECTR and no corroborating agent notes, this appears to be a copy/paste or data-entry outlier.
Gas is moderately supported at the building level. The MLS data shows GAS in 12 of 20 listings, and one public remark mentions a 'gas range,' which aligns with gas service being available in the building. This is not as explicit as cable or water, but the pattern supports inclusion.
Hot water appears to be a standard association fee inclusion. The current MLS data shows HOTWAT in 16 of 20 listings, with no contrary WTRHTR evidence. Public remarks are silent, but the historical MLS consistency is strong.
Internet is supported by the MLS data but not by the public remarks. INTSER appears in 13 of 20 current listings, suggesting it is a common but not universal fee inclusion. The lack of remark mentions means confidence is moderate rather than high.
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is overwhelmingly supported. The MLS data shows SEWER in 19 of 20 listings, which is close to universal. No remarks contradict it, so this remains a high-confidence building feature.
Water inclusion is strongly supported at the building level. WATER appears in 19 of 20 current MLS records, making it effectively standard for the building. Public remarks do not contradict this pattern.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that Waikiki Shore offers patio/deck-style outdoor space, especially lanais, across many units. At least 15+ listings mention phrases like "expansive lanai," "spacious 130 sq.ft. lanai," "large lanai/patio," and "private lanai," making this a consistent feature across multiple remarks and agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence strongly supports that the building has restaurant/dining options. Multiple listings explicitly mention "on-site restaurants," "Steak Shack on the ground floor," and beachfront "eateries," and several other remarks place the building within walking distance of restaurants. The pattern appears across many listings and is consistent with the prior high-confidence MLS amenity data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage units/lockers appear to be a real building feature at Waikiki Shore, not just a one-off copy-paste checkbox. Across the remarks, many listings independently reference storage in different ways—'Large Storage Locker,' 'one dedicated storage space,' 'extra large dedicated secured storage,' and 'secure storage closet on the same floor'—which strongly confirms availability. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and listings, so this feature should be included.
I looked for surfboard storage references, including surf storage and bike-and-surfboard storage. The remarks mention general storage lockers and a surf shop on the lobby level, but nothing that indicates dedicated surfboard storage.
No analysis available
Confidence 87%: Only 1 of 18 MLS listings marks TRACHU in amenities and none of the many detailed remarks ever mention a trash chute, making it more likely that the single checked box is an agent error than a true building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for terms such as "salt water pool," "saltwater pool," and related wording. Although the building context says there is a pool, the public remarks do not describe it as salt water.
Laundry in unit is strongly supported for Waikiki Shore. Historical MLS inclusions show washer/dryer in 19 of 20 listings, and current remarks repeatedly confirm it across many listings with explicit wording such as "washer/dryer," "in-suite laundry," and "washer/dryer in unit." This appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I looked for references to coin laundry, quarters, card-operated machines, laundry fees, or other paid laundry language. The remarks only reference in-unit washer/dryer, so there is no evidence of paid community laundry.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," and similar wording. The listings only mention in-unit laundry or storage lockers, so there is no evidence of community laundry facilities on every floor.
At least 6 listings explicitly mention on-site parking or an assigned/rented stall (quotes include "parking stall", "1 assigned parking is included", and "the parking stall is rented by the Outrigger for $700 a month"). Several other listings note parking is not included or is available upon request, indicating variability in availability and that parking may be assigned, rented, or offered separately. Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and aligns with MLS parking checkbox entries on some units, so the building should be marked as having parking.
Assigned parking is explicitly mentioned in multiple listings, not just inferred from MLS checkboxes. Phrases like 'one assigned parking stall' and '1 assigned parking' appear in the remarks, suggesting this is a real building/unit feature rather than copy-paste noise. Confidence is high because the language is direct and repeated across listings.
Covered parking appears in the MLS checkbox data for 6 of 20 listings, but the public remarks do not explicitly say 'covered parking,' 'garage,' or 'carport' in the listings provided. The remarks only imply a parking structure through references like 'upper parking deck' and assigned parking stalls, so this looks more like moderate MLS evidence than explicit confirmation. Confidence is moderate because the building seems to offer parking in some form, but the covered aspect is not strongly described in remarks.
I looked for wording like deeded parking, owned stall, parking included in deed, or parking included with the unit. The remarks instead describe assigned parking, rented parking, or parking available at extra cost, so there is no evidence the parking is deeded.
No analysis available
I looked for any monthly parking charge or additional parking cost and found a direct amount. The clearest public remark states the stall is rented for $700 per month.
Evidence is moderate: 9 of 20 current listings include GUEST in parking_features, but the public remarks mostly focus on assigned, rented, or optional parking rather than clearly stating guest parking. Phrases like 'parking is usually available upon request,' 'one assigned parking stall,' and 'parking stall is rented' suggest parking access exists, but the remarks do not strongly confirm visitor parking. Because the MLS checkbox appears in a significant minority of listings, this is plausible but still somewhat likely to reflect agent-entered data rather than explicit verification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for references to a parking waitlist, waiting list, or instructions to join a parking list and found none. The remarks mention parking availability in general, but nothing suggests a formal waitlist system.
No analysis available
I looked for card/fob access language such as keycard entry, fob access, or card readers. The remarks mention security guard coverage and one mention of "secured entry," but nothing that clearly confirms a card-based security system.
Security-guard service appears to be a real building feature at Waikiki Shore. Historical MLS data shows 15 of 20 listings with SECGUA, and at least one current remark explicitly says "security guard on duty 24/7," which strongly confirms the amenity. The repeated nature of the building remarks suggests this is not just a one-off agent checkbox error.
I searched for patrol-related wording like security patrol, roving security, or patrolled building. The remarks consistently mention a security guard on duty 24/7, but not a patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence confirms split AC is available in the building. Multiple listings explicitly state 'Split A/C systems,' 'Split A/Cs,' 'split A/C system,' and 'Newer Split A.C.,' and the historical MLS data is also highly consistent (16/20 listings with ACSPL). This appears to be a real building/unit feature rather than a copy-paste error.
Evidence for window/unit A/C is limited but present: 3 of 20 current MLS listings include ACWIUN. The remarks more often describe split A/C or just “air conditioning,” so the feature appears to exist in at least some units, but the wording suggests listing copy may be inconsistent rather than consistently describing the same A/C type.
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS record: 17 of 20 current listings mark CONCRE, and earlier building-level evidence was already high confidence. The public remarks focus on location, renovations, and rental use rather than construction type, but nothing suggests a material change away from concrete. This appears to be stable building-level data rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
There is no public-remark support for double-wall construction in the listings reviewed. Only 2 of 20 current MLS listings have the DOUWAL flag, which is too sparse to treat as reliable building-level evidence and appears inconsistent with the repeated agent remarks.
No analysis available
Masonry/stucco (MASSTU) is selected in 4 of 20 current MLS listings by different agents, with no conflicting descriptions in the remarks. While not explicitly described in text, this pattern plus prior medium confidence supports that the building utilizes masonry/stucco elements, likely in its exterior cladding.
Some MLS records (5 of 20 current listings) list STEFRA in construction materials, which produced prior high confidence in the database. However, none of the public remarks across listings mention steel-frame construction (remarks instead focus on oceanfront features and recent lobby/elevator upgrades), and concrete is otherwise commonly selected, so the evidence for steel-frame is implied from MLS checkbox data rather than confirmed in agent remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing remarks explicitly reference above-ground construction, above-ground materials, or related wording. With only 5 of 20 listings checked for ABOGRO and no supporting narrative across the remarks, the evidence looks weak and likely copied rather than verified.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks repeatedly and explicitly state that daily short-term vacation rentals are legal. Multiple listings describe the property as a legal vacation rental building, so STRs are clearly allowed.
I looked for hotel rental pool or hotel-managed rental program references and found several direct matches. The remarks repeatedly mention Castle Resorts and Outrigger rental programs, indicating participation in a hotel-style rental pool.
I searched for language requiring all units to participate in a rental pool and found the opposite. The remarks explicitly say owners can self-manage, choose among rental management companies, or use the unit as desired, so participation is not mandatory.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for ground lease, leasehold, lease expiry, renewal, or lease end dates and found none. The remarks instead describe the property as fee-simple, so a lease expiry year is not applicable.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA loan approval language and found none. The listings discuss short-term rentals, parking, views, and building upgrades, but nothing indicates VA financing eligibility.
I looked for HOA insurance wording such as fully insured, walls-in coverage, full building insurance, or comprehensive coverage. The remarks discuss fees, management, elevators, and rentals, but do not address insurance status, so this cannot be verified from the public text.
No listings in the provided remarks explicitly mention fire sprinklers, sprinkler systems, or fire suppression. Since only 2 of 20 current MLS records have FIRSPR checked and there is no corroborating narrative evidence, this feature does not appear established from the public remarks.
I searched the remarks for FLSE/pass language, fire inspection references, and life-safety compliance statements. Nothing in the provided listings mentions a passed fire/life safety evaluation or any equivalent certification, so this remains unconfirmed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are overwhelmingly confirmed. Across the provided remarks, well over 20 listings reference phrases like 'spectacular ocean views,' 'front-row views of the Pacific Ocean,' 'breathtaking views of the Pacific,' and 'unobstructed ocean views.' The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and looks like genuine building-level offering, not copy-paste error.
Multiple listings call out 'Diamond Head', 'Koolau Mountains', 'mountain views', and 'mauka' or similar language alongside ocean and coastline references, indicating some units offer mountain/landmark views. This consistent, explicit language across listings supports including mountain views for the building.
No analysis available
Strong evidence that this building offers city views. At least several listings explicitly mention "city views" or related combinations such as "city skyline" and "ocean, city, mountain and sunset views," suggesting this is a recurring building-level view amenity rather than a one-off typo. The evidence is consistent across multiple remarks and agents.
Coastline views are consistently advertised. Remarks reference 'beautiful coastline,' 'unobstructed views of Waikiki’s iconic coastline,' 'sweeping views of the Pacific Ocean and Waikiki coastline,' and 'sandy coastlines and turquoise waters.' This is strong multi-listing evidence that coastline views are a real feature of the building.
Garden-type views are supported by numerous remarks, though they are usually described indirectly as park, treetop, palm, or greenery views rather than literal 'garden view.' Examples include 'wide open view of Fort DeRussy Park,' 'lush park-like beachfront setting,' and 'tranquil treetop and verdant park setting.' This appears to be a real building feature available in some units.
No analysis available
No evidence in any of the listings (0 of 20) referencing marina/harbor/canal/Ala Wai views. Given absence in current remarks and MLS checkbox, and no prior support, this corrects a potential false positive: the building does not offer marina views.
No analysis available
Very strong evidence that the building has sunset views. Many listings mention sunsets directly, with phrases such as "breathtaking sunsets," "glorious sunsets," "golden sunsets," "endless sunsets," and "front-row seats to the iconic Hilton Friday night fireworks." This appears consistently across multiple listings and is not limited to a single unit.
No analysis available
The public remarks repeatedly confirm fireworks views from the units and lanais, not merely proximity to fireworks. Multiple listings explicitly say residents can watch the Friday fireworks from the building, so this is strongly supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the listings, the remarks repeatedly say the building is 'well managed' or 'excellently managed,' and several note Castle Resorts operating the front desk, but none explicitly describe a resident manager or live-in/on-site manager. Because the language is management-related rather than a resident-manager confirmation, the feature should be treated as absent from the verified remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.