Waikiki Shore
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Waikiki Shore
Building Overview
Waikiki Shore in Waikiki — 15-story concrete building with ocean and sunset views; amenities include a pool and concierge.
About Waikiki Shore
According to available records, Waikiki Shore is a 15-floor concrete residential building in the Central Waikiki neighborhood built in 1960. The property contains 168 units and has two elevators.
Based on MLS data, on-site amenities include a pool, BBQ area, concierge services, and a security guard. Units report ocean, mountain, and sunset views and use split or window air-conditioning.
Additional details from MLS: parking is available (covered and assigned) with guest parking; pets are not allowed; short-term rentals are permitted. Management is handled by Hawaiian Properties, Ltd. This summary is based on MLS data — buyers should verify all building features, policies, and fees with the listing agent or management company.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy statements, including percentages and qualitative descriptions, but found nothing. One remark mentions a "high occupancy rate," but that refers to rental occupancy, not owner occupancy. The current 10% value is retained because there is no remarks-based evidence to change it.
I found repeated references to elevator upgrades and to elevator access, which confirms the building has elevators. However, none of the remarks provide a specific number, so I kept the current value of 2. No explicit count was found to confirm or deny the existing number.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV inclusion is well supported across many listings, not just one agent remark. Multiple public remarks explicitly state "Cable $65.09" alongside maintenance and reserve amounts, which matches the MLS checkbox data and indicates this is a building-level included fee.
MLS data shows OTCOEX checked in 12 of 20 current records. Remarks reference low, itemized maintenance fees repeatedly (implying building-covered common services), but no listings explicitly state 'common area electricity included.' Included with moderate confidence based on MLS prevalence and implied remarks.
No analysis available
There is no meaningful support in the public remarks for electricity being included in the association fee. With only 1 of 20 current MLS records showing ELECTR and no corroborating agent notes, this appears to be a copy/paste or data-entry outlier.
Gas is moderately well supported by the MLS data and reinforced by several remarks mentioning gas appliances, especially the "newly replaced... gas range." The remarks do not say gas is included directly, but the repeated MLS checkbox presence makes this a credible building feature.
HOTWAT is checked in 17 of 20 current MLS records. While remarks do not explicitly say 'hot water included,' the high MLS prevalence supports inclusion; evidence is implied across listings rather than explicitly described in agent remarks.
INTSER appears in 13 of 20 current MLS records. No listings explicitly advertise 'internet included' or 'wifi included' in the public remarks, so this is an MLS-driven, implied inclusion with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion appears to be a stable building-level feature. Nearly all current MLS records include it, and there is no contrary evidence in the remarks, so this should be treated as highly reliable.
Water inclusion is strongly supported by the MLS records and is consistent with the public remarks describing low, itemized maintenance fees. There is no evidence suggesting this feature changed, so it should remain included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Many listings (15+ in these remarks) describe outdoor lanai or lanai/patio areas, e.g., "expansive lanai," "spacious 130 sq.ft. lanai," "large lanai/patio," and "private lanai with unobstructed ocean views." These references span different units and wording styles, suggesting multiple agents confirming real outdoor patio/deck-style spaces rather than a single copy-paste. Even though only 6/20 MLS entries check the patio/deck box, the remarks provide strong building-level evidence that patio/deck (lanai) spaces are a common feature in Waikiki Shore.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence strongly supports that the building has restaurant/dining options. At least several current listings explicitly mention 'on-site restaurants,' 'eateries in the building too,' and a 'popular take out restaurant Steak Shack on the ground floor,' while others note restaurants and dining steps away. The repeated mentions across multiple remarks and the current MLS amenity checkbox suggest this is a real building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly reference on-site storage or lockers—phrases include "private 6’ x 8’ storage locker", "Large Storage Locker", "one dedicated storage space", and "extra large dedicated secured storage located on the same floor." At least a dozen separate remarks mention storage across listings, consistent with prior MLS checkbox data, indicating strong, building-wide availability of storage/lockers rather than isolated or erroneous agent copy/paste.
I looked for surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, or bike-and-surfboard storage. The listings mention surfboard rental and general storage lockers, but not dedicated surfboard storage facilities.
No analysis available
Confidence 87%: Only 1 of 18 MLS listings marks TRACHU in amenities and none of the many detailed remarks ever mention a trash chute, making it more likely that the single checked box is an agent error than a true building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for "salt water pool," "saltwater pool," "salt pool," and similar phrases, but found no description of the pool type. The building has a pool in context, but the public remarks do not identify it as salt water.
Laundry in unit is strongly supported for this building. Historical MLS inclusions show washer/dryer in 19 of 20 listings, and current remarks repeatedly say things like "Washer/Dryer," "New Washer/Dryer," and "newly replaced unitized washer/dryer." The consistency across many listings suggests this is a real building feature rather than a sporadic MLS error.
No analysis available
I looked for references to coin-op, card-operated, quarters, paid laundry, or laundry fees and found no such language. The remarks focus on unit amenities and management details rather than a community laundry room.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like "laundry on each floor," "every floor," and "floor-by-floor laundry," but found nothing. The listings mention in-unit washers/dryers and general building details, not community laundry on each floor.
At least 6 listings explicitly mention on-site parking or an assigned/rented stall (quotes include "parking stall", "1 assigned parking is included", and "the parking stall is rented by the Outrigger for $700 a month"). Several other listings note parking is not included or is available upon request, indicating variability in availability and that parking may be assigned, rented, or offered separately. Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and aligns with MLS parking checkbox entries on some units, so the building should be marked as having parking.
No analysis available
No listings' public remarks explicitly state covered parking or garage; references are limited to 'parking stall', 'assigned parking', or 'parking available upon request.' CURRENT MLS shows some covered/garage checkboxes (5/20), but the absence of explicit language in remarks suggests covered parking is not clearly documented in agent remarks across listings.
I searched for deeded/owned parking language such as deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in deed. The listings only refer to an assigned stall, which is not enough to confirm deeded parking.
No analysis available
I looked for any monthly parking charge and found a direct fee stated in the remarks. This is the clearest parking-cost evidence in the listings.
The evidence for guest parking is moderate rather than explicit. Current MLS data includes GUEST in 10 of 20 listings, while the public remarks mostly discuss assigned stalls, rented stalls, or parking available by request instead of clearly stating guest parking. This looks more like MLS-level consistency than strong remark-based confirmation, so it supports inclusion with medium confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like parking waitlist, waiting list, or join the waitlist. Nothing in the remarks indicates a formal waitlist process for parking.
No analysis available
I looked for key card access, fob access, card readers, electronic access, and keycard entry, but found none. The remarks mention secured entry and a managed building, which is not enough to confirm card/fob security.
The building appears to offer security-guard service, supported by current MLS data showing SECGUA in 14 of 20 listings. Public remarks are mostly silent on guards specifically, but one listing references 'secured entry,' and the overall pattern suggests the amenity is being consistently carried in MLS rather than copied in error.
I searched for references to security patrol, roving security, patrol service, or a patrolled building and found nothing. The remarks describe the building as secured and well managed, but do not mention patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
High historical support: 17/20 listings list ACSPL. Multiple current remarks across different listings explicitly state split A/C (examples: 'Split A/Cs', 'split A/C system', 'Newer Split A.C.' and 'newer split A/Cs'), indicating many units have ductless/individual AC. Evidence is consistent across several agent listings (likely some copy‑paste but also specific unit notes), so include split_ac as a building feature.
Evidence for window/unit A/C is limited but present: 3 of 20 current MLS listings include ACWIUN. The remarks more often describe split A/C or just “air conditioning,” so the feature appears to exist in at least some units, but the wording suggests listing copy may be inconsistent rather than consistently describing the same A/C type.
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS history: 18 of 20 current listings mark CONCRE, with earlier building-level evidence already described as high confidence. Public remarks across listings focus on location, views, and renovations, and do not contradict the concrete designation. This looks like consistent building-level MLS data rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
Weak/ambiguous evidence for double-wall construction: only 3 of 20 current MLS listings have DOUWAL checked, and none of the public remarks reference 'double wall' or 'double-wall construction.' Given the low occurrence and absence from agent remarks, this appears to be an inconsistent or erroneous checkbox usage rather than a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
Masonry/stucco (MASSTU) is selected in 4 of 20 current MLS listings by different agents, with no conflicting descriptions in the remarks. While not explicitly described in text, this pattern plus prior medium confidence supports that the building utilizes masonry/stucco elements, likely in its exterior cladding.
Some MLS records (5 of 20 current listings) list STEFRA in construction materials, which produced prior high confidence in the database. However, none of the public remarks across listings mention steel-frame construction (remarks instead focus on oceanfront features and recent lobby/elevator upgrades), and concrete is otherwise commonly selected, so the evidence for steel-frame is implied from MLS checkbox data rather than confirmed in agent remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox data shows 4 of ~20 current listings (previously ~3 of 20) with the ABOGRO construction flag, but none of the public remarks mention 'above ground' construction or materials. Evidence is limited and may reflect copy/paste checkbox use by agents; historical MLS entries still provide the main support for keeping the feature true, though remarks do not corroborate it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks repeatedly confirm that short-term rentals are allowed. Several listings also describe the property as a legal vacation rental building with daily rentals permitted.
I searched for hotel-managed rental pool references and found multiple direct matches. The building is repeatedly described as being in Castle Resorts or Outrigger rental programs, which supports a hotel-style rental pool.
I looked for language requiring all units to participate in a rental pool. The remarks clearly show flexibility and optional participation, so mandatory pool participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold wording such as a lease end year, ground lease expiration, or renewal date. Instead, the remarks explicitly call it fee-simple, so there is no lease expiry year to extract.
I searched the public remarks for VA-approved, VA financing, and VA loan language and found none. With no explicit reference to VA eligibility, this is treated as not indicated in the listings.
I looked for insurance coverage language that would indicate the HOA provides full or walls-in coverage, but there were no such references. The remarks discuss maintenance fees and management, not insurance status. So there is no basis to mark the building as fully insured from these listings.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for fire/life safety compliance language, including FLSE-related phrases and references to fire inspection approval, but found none. Because there is no explicit evidence in the remarks, this remains unconfirmed. The current remarks focus on renovations, beach access, and rental eligibility rather than safety certification.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Very strong evidence across the remarks: well over 20 listings reference ocean views, including phrases like 'spectacular ocean views,' 'front-row views of the Pacific Ocean,' and 'unobstructed ocean views.' The consistent language from multiple listings/agents matches the strong MLS history and does not look like a one-off copy-paste error.
Multiple listings call out 'Diamond Head', 'Koolau Mountains', 'mountain views', and 'mauka' or similar language alongside ocean and coastline references, indicating some units offer mountain/landmark views. This consistent, explicit language across listings supports including mountain views for the building.
No analysis available
Strong evidence across multiple listings: approximately 12 of 20 listings explicitly reference city or city-skyline views (quotes include 'city skyline', 'city views', 'Waikiki and ... city'). Mentions are consistent across many agents' remarks and align with prior high-confidence historical data, indicating the building offers units with city views.
Coastline views are consistently and explicitly advertised in the remarks, with multiple listings calling out 'Waikiki coastline,' 'iconic coastline,' and 'sweeping views.' The repeated references across many listings align with the MLS history and indicate this is a genuine feature for some units.
The building appears to offer garden/landscaped-style views in some units, usually described as park, treetop, palm, or greenery views rather than literal garden-only wording. Several remarks explicitly mention 'Fort DeRussy Park,' 'lush park-like beachfront setting,' and 'verdant park setting,' supporting the MLS garden-view signal.
No analysis available
No evidence in any of the listings (0 of 20) referencing marina/harbor/canal/Ala Wai views. Given absence in current remarks and MLS checkbox, and no prior support, this corrects a potential false positive: the building does not offer marina views.
No analysis available
Sunset views are clearly marketed across many remarks, with repeated phrases like 'beautiful sunsets,' 'golden sunsets,' and 'endless sunsets.' Multiple listings also mention Friday night fireworks from the lanai, reinforcing that sunset-facing views are a real building feature for some units.
No analysis available
The remarks explicitly confirm fireworks views from units and lanais, not just proximity to fireworks. Multiple listings mention Friday night fireworks views directly from the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Listing remarks frequently note that the building is well or excellently managed but never reference a resident or on-site manager, which would typically be highlighted if present. With only 5/20 current MLS listings checking the RESMAN box and no explicit textual confirmation, the balance of evidence indicates the building does not have a dedicated resident manager on-site.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.