Waikiki Park Heights

Every one of the 11 listings reports the building as built in 1974, with no conflicting information in the remarks. This consistent MLS data strongly supports 1974 as the correct year built.

County records list 23 floors, while the listings reach only floor 22 and are sparse at the top; the state registration's 24-floor figure is set aside as unreliable and likely includes a nonresidential level.

The county condominium count is 158, matching the currently stored value, and the listings establish at least 43 distinct units; the county's reconciled value of 22 is contradicted by the listings, while the state figures conflict and appear to use a different count.

Owner occupancy from AOUO registration(s) 566. Refreshed by Real_Estate_Scraper/reb_registry/propagate_owner_occupancy.py, which this lock does not block.

The remarks confirm elevator service and describe the elevators as new and keyed. No listing states two, four, or multiple elevators, so the current value of 2 is retained with low confidence because there is no evidence in the remarks to confirm or deny the count.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Central air-conditioning inclusion is strongly supported by MLS data and direct remarks. One listing specifically says the fee includes "electricity, central A/C, cable, internet, water, hot water and sewer," while several others describe central A/C throughout the building's units.

Cable inclusion is strongly supported across the building. Remarks state that fees include “cable TV,” “ALL utilities, Wi-Fi, cable TV,” and “cable TV, electricity, water, sewer, hot water,” consistent with the 19/20 MLS inclusion rate.

Common expenses are supported by the current MLS pattern and explicit association-fee language. The remark stating that fees include “cable TV, electricity, water, sewer, hot water, internet service, and other common expenses” directly confirms this feature.

Across all provided remarks, there is no mention of co-op status or cooperative taxes being included in fees, and COOTAX is unchecked in every current MLS record. This strongly supports that cooperative taxes are not part of the association fee for this building.

Electricity inclusion is one of the strongest-supported features. Multiple remarks say “maintenance fee includes electricity,” “electricity and other utilities,” or that “all utilities including electricity are included,” matching the 19/20 MLS rate.

Several listings carefully enumerate the utilities included in the HOA, and gas is never mentioned, while other utilities are repeatedly listed by name. Combined with GAS being unchecked in all MLS entries, this strongly indicates that gas is not included in the maintenance fees (and likely not provided at all).

Hot water is strongly confirmed by both MLS data and remarks. Listings state that fees cover “water/sewer, and hot water” and separately list “electricity, cable, internet, water, hot water and sewer”; the absence of WTRHTR further supports building-supplied hot water.

Internet inclusion is supported by both current MLS data and direct remarks. Key phrases include "monthly maintenance fee includes ALL utilities, Wi-Fi, cable TV" and "all utilities: electricity, cable, internet, water, sewer, and trash," indicating confirmation from multiple listings.

Across all remarks, amenities like pool, security, laundry, and surfboard storage are highlighted, but there is no reference to any marina or boat-related fees. With MARINA unchecked in all MLS records, it is very likely that marina access or fees are not included in the maintenance costs.

Sewer inclusion is repeatedly confirmed across listings. Remarks cite “water/sewer,” “electricity, cable, internet, water, hot water and sewer,” and “all utilities: electricity, cable, internet, water, sewer, and trash,” consistent with the 18/20 MLS rate.

Water inclusion is very strongly supported. Remarks repeatedly state that fees include “water/sewer,” “water, hot water and sewer,” or “all utilities,” including water, matching the 19/20 MLS inclusion rate.

Multiple agents describe the building’s amenities (saltwater pool, patio/deck, community laundry, surfboard racks, etc.) without any reference to BBQ or grilling facilities. The single MLS BBQ checkbox appears to be an outlier, so the building is treated as not having a BBQ area.

Remarks for one unit clearly state that the building has 'multiple bike/moped racks,' which is explicit bicycle storage. This is a common-area amenity, so buyers seeking buildings with bike storage would find it available here despite its absence in MLS checkboxes.

Remarks emphasize proximity to Waikiki Beach and surfing, not direct dock or marina access. The total absence of boat-related amenities and MLS support confirms there is no boat dock associated with the building.

Parking details focus on covered stalls and rental availability, but there is no reference to any car wash facility. The absence of both remarks and MLS indication supports that there is no car wash amenity.

The building is described as a condo tower with pool, laundry, security, and an on-site restaurant, but there is no hint of a separate clubhouse facility. The consistent lack of mention and MLS data indicate no clubhouse.

No listing advertises concierge or front-desk services, despite detailed descriptions of other amenities. Given the consistent absence of this feature in both remarks and MLS checkboxes, the building appears not to have concierge service.

At least one listing notes that pets are not allowed, and none advertise any dog exercise area. Given the non-pet-friendly policy and lack of MLS indication, a dog park is effectively ruled out.

Remarks consistently describe security guards and resident/site managers but never mention a doorman or lobby attendant. With the doorman checkbox absent in all MLS entries, it is very likely the building does not offer doorman service.

Across 11 listings, agents consistently list amenities such as pool, laundry, security, and Hy’s Steak House but never mention any gym or fitness facility. With the MLS exercise-room amenity unchecked in all cases, this strongly indicates the building does not offer an exercise room.

Even though this is a well-located Waikiki building, agents do not advertise any limousine or courtesy car service. Given that such a luxury feature would typically be highlighted, it is very likely not offered here.

Agents do not advertise any community or conference room among the shared amenities. With no MLS support, it is very likely the building does not offer a meeting room.

Multiple listings indicate a patio/deck amenity, and one explicitly states: 'Amenities include a salt water pool, patio/deck, community laundry, surfboard racks, and resident manager.' The consistency between MLS checkboxes and detailed remarks across different agents strongly supports that the building offers a patio/deck area.

Remarks emphasize proximity to beaches, parks, and city life but do not identify a dedicated jogging or walking path as part of the building. This suggests the building does not offer its own jogging path.

Across detailed amenity lists, there is no reference to any kids’ play area or playground. The consistent omission and MLS data indicate there is no playground.

Across all remarks, outdoor space is described only as lanais and a pool, with no reference to yards or enclosed ground-level outdoor areas. Combined with 0/11 MLS entries for private yard, this strongly indicates the building does not offer private yard space as an amenity.

Agents do not advertise any golf-related amenities, focusing instead on the pool and urban location. This, combined with the lack of MLS checkmarks, shows there is no putting green.

Listings emphasize a saltwater pool, patio/deck, and lounge areas but do not describe a broader recreation or amenity area. Given the lack of explicit mention and no MLS checkmarks, a formal recreation area is unlikely.

Amenity descriptions focus on the saltwater pool, patio/deck, lounge areas, and on-site restaurant, without any reference to a dedicated recreation or game room. The consistent MLS omission supports that a recreation room is not present.

At least 10 listings explicitly mention the building's on-site Hy's Steak House, using phrases including "on site," "on the ground floor," "right at your doorstep," and "above the famous Hy's Steakhouse." The repeated, detailed references across multiple listings and the current MLS amenity data strongly confirm that the building has a restaurant.

Amenity descriptions are focused on the pool area, patio/deck, and units’ private lanais, with no indication of a shared rooftop space. This absence across many listings suggests there is no rooftop amenity.

Agents highlight the pool, laundry, security, surfboard storage, and on-site restaurant but never a sauna or steam facility. The lack of any mention across many listings makes it very likely that no sauna is present.

At least two listings describe dedicated surfboard storage facilities, including a 'surfboard storage locker' and 'surfboard racks.' These are building-level locker amenities available to residents, so the building should be treated as offering storage units/lockers even though agents are not checking the storage box in the MLS.

Surfboard storage is clearly confirmed in several listings. The references to lockers, racks, and secured surfboard storage provide strong, repeated evidence.

Agents describe location, pool, laundry, security, and on-site restaurant but never mention tennis facilities. Combined with the absence of the MLS tennis-court amenity, this strongly indicates there is no tennis court.

None of the 20 provided listing remarks mention a trash chute, garbage chute, or refuse chute. Nevertheless, 17 of 20 current MLS listings mark TRACHU, consistent with the prior pattern of 16 of 18 listings, but the lack of independent remarks makes the evidence moderate rather than strong.

Parking is consistently described as deeded or rentable covered stalls and guest parking managed by security, with no mention of valet services. The absence of any 'valet' references in both checkboxes and remarks across many listings supports that there is no valet amenity at this building.

Listings emphasize the building’s central Waikiki location and access to surrounding streets and shops without referencing gates or perimeter fencing. With no MLS indication of gated or walled grounds, it is very unlikely that the property has a enclosing wall or fence as a marketed feature.

Amenity lists refer only to a saltwater pool, with no suggestion of an accompanying spa or whirlpool. This consistent pattern and MLS data indicate there is no whirlpool/hot tub facility.

The building pool is consistently confirmed across multiple listings and agents: at least 13 remarks explicitly mention a pool or swimming pool. Descriptions include “sparkling swimming pool,” “heated saltwater pool,” and “new saltwater pool,” supported by pool amenities appearing in all 20 current MLS listings.

At least one listing clearly describes the building amenity as a 'heated saltwater pool', while several others refer to the same saltwater pool without specifying temperature. Because amenities are shared building-wide and no listing suggests a separate unheated pool, the evidence supports that the building’s pool is heated. The single explicit 'heated' remark is detailed and consistent with the broader amenity descriptions.

Saltwater pool status is repeatedly and explicitly confirmed across the listings. This is strong evidence that the building pool is saltwater.

Multiple current listings explicitly mention in-unit laundry — e.g., 'washer and dryer in unit' and 'Washer/Dryer is in the unit' appear in at least 3 different unit remarks. This confirms prior high-confidence MLS data indicating some units (notably 3-bedroom corner units) include in-unit washers and dryers; evidence is consistent across multiple listings rather than only a single ad.

Community laundry is strongly supported across multiple listings and agents. At least four provided remarks explicitly mention "community laundry," including descriptions of it as a building amenity, while current MLS data marks COMLAU on 16/20 listings. A few units have in-unit washers and dryers, but that does not contradict the building's shared laundry availability.

I searched for coin laundry, paid laundry, laundry fees, card-operated machines, quarters, and similar wording. No payment requirement is identified in the remarks.

I searched for laundry on each floor, laundry rooms on every floor, and floor-by-floor laundry. The remarks only mention community laundry generally, so there is no evidence confirming building-wide laundry on every floor.

Parking is strongly supported across multiple listings, with at least 11 of 20 current MLS records indicating parking and numerous remarks explicitly describing assigned or covered stalls. Other listings note guest parking or parking rental availability, confirming that the building offers parking even though it is not included with every unit.

At least 6 listings explicitly mention assigned or deeded parking, including "one assigned parking," "1 assigned covered parking stall," and "deeded parking." The evidence appears across multiple listings and is consistent with the current MLS data, where 11 of 19 listings contain an ASSIGN parking feature.

At least 6 listings explicitly reference covered parking, including "covered parking," "one covered parking stall," and "separately deeded covered parking stall." The repeated descriptions across multiple units, together with COVERE/CO1/CO2/CO3PLUS/GARAGE appearing in 8 of 19 current listings, strongly support this building feature.

Multiple listings establish that deeded or separately deeded parking exists for at least some units. One remark also clarifies that not all condos include deeded parking, so this is a building-level presence rather than a guarantee for every unit.

Across 11 listings with detailed amenity descriptions, there is no reference to EV or electric vehicle charging, and the EVCHRG field is never selected in MLS data. This consistent absence makes it highly likely that the building does not provide EV charging stations at this time.

Parking is described as a separate monthly charge rather than universally included in maintenance fees. The most frequently and specifically cited amount is $193 per month, although historical listings mention lower amounts.

Several listings mention guest parking, including repeated remarks that the building has "guest parking" and a detailed rule that guest parking is available from 8:00am to 4:30pm with security registration. Although only 2 of 19 current MLS records contain the GUEST checkbox, the explicit remarks and prior high-confidence evidence support including it.

Listings emphasize building security (24-hour security, keyed elevator, extra secure building) but never mention a gated or card-controlled garage, and SECENT is unchecked for all units. This pattern indicates that while the building is secure, the parking itself is not described as having a distinct secured entry system.

Neither MLS data nor remarks reference tandem stalls, despite multiple detailed descriptions of parking arrangements (assigned, deeded, covered, rental, guest). The lack of any mention supports the conclusion that tandem parking is not a feature of this building.

Across all listings, there is no mention of valet or attended parking, and the VALET field is never selected in MLS data. Given how consistently amenities are otherwise marketed, this strongly suggests the building does not provide valet parking.

The remarks directly establish that rental parking is subject to a long waitlist. Other listings also indicate that parking rental is handled through building management, consistent with limited availability.

A public remark specifically notes that the building 'has 24 hour security, keyed elevator,' which directly matches the keyed elevator feature definition. Even though the generic elevator amenity is not checked in MLS, the explicit remark provides strong evidence this secure elevator access exists.

I searched for key card access, fob access, card readers, keycard entry, and electronic access systems. General security language and a keyed elevator do not establish a card or fob access system.

Security service is strongly supported: 18 of 20 current listings include the SECGUA amenity, and multiple agents explicitly describe the building as having '24-hour security' or '24 hr. security.' The repeated confirmations across listings, together with the previously high historical confidence, indicate this is a genuine building-wide amenity rather than an isolated or copied checkbox.

I searched for security patrol, roving security, patrol service, and patrolled-building language. The listings confirm general or 24-hour security only, with no explicit evidence of patrol service.

Across all provided listings, there are no references to cameras or video surveillance, only to guards and general 'security'. With SECSYS absent from every MLS record, it appears the building does not advertise a dedicated video security system.

At least 11 of 20 listings explicitly mention central air conditioning, including "central AC," "new central A/C," and "Central Air-Conditioning." The evidence is strong across multiple listings and agents, and is reinforced by ACCEN appearing in the inclusions for all 20 listings, so this is not merely an isolated or likely copy-pasted checkbox.

Across all provided listings, air conditioning is only described as 'central A/C' or via central-coil upgrades, with no references to ductless, split, or mini-split systems and no split AC boxes checked in the MLS. Given the building’s central system and utility-included HOA structure, it is very unlikely that split AC is a building feature.

Numerous listings emphasize central A/C and recent central A/C coil or system upgrades, and none mention window, wall, or room air conditioners. MLS data likewise shows no window AC inclusions, so window units are very unlikely to be a feature of this building.

All 19 current listings identify concrete construction through the MLS construction-materials field (CONCRE). No public remarks explicitly quote 'concrete construction,' but the unanimous building-level MLS data provides very strong evidence that the building is constructed with concrete.

Three of 19 current listings identify DOUWAL in the MLS construction-materials field, while no provided public remarks explicitly describe double-wall construction. Although the checkbox appears in only a minority of listings and may reflect inconsistent agent data entry, the prior high-confidence building-level evidence supports retaining the feature.

Hollow tile construction is never checked in MLS (0 of 11) and never mentioned in remarks. This provides strong negative evidence that the building is not characterized as hollow-tile construction.

None of the 11 MLS listings use the masonry/stucco construction checkbox. With consistent selection of concrete and no supporting remarks, it is unlikely the building is classified as masonry-stucco construction.

None of the 11 MLS listings check the steel-frame box, while all agree on concrete. With no remarks mentioning steel framing, the best-supported interpretation is that the building is not classified as steel-frame construction in MLS.

The SLAB construction option is never checked in the available MLS data (0 of 11), and listing remarks are silent about slab foundations. In the absence of any explicit MLS or remarks support, the building is not classified as 'slab' in this dataset.

No analysis available

Zero of 11 recent MLS listings mark wood frame, and all instead mark concrete. Combined with the obvious high-rise condo form in Waikiki, this strongly indicates the building is not wood-frame construction.

The above-ground construction box is checked in a minority (3 of 11) of MLS listings and is not corroborated by any remarks. Given the inconsistency for a building-level trait, it is more likely an MLS data quirk than a reliable feature.

No recent listings indicate brick construction in the MLS data. The building presents and is described as a typical Waikiki high-rise condo, making brick construction highly unlikely.

Single-wall construction, common in older low-rise Hawaii homes, is not indicated in any of the 11 MLS records and would be incompatible with a high-rise tower of this type. This makes single-wall construction virtually impossible here.

The explicit 30-day minimum rental policy rules out typical short-term rentals. No remarks mention STR permission, TVU, NUC, vacation rentals, or another exception allowing stays shorter than 30 days.

The remarks mention a restaurant, pool, security, and management but do not identify participation in a hotel rental pool. Because short-term rentals are not allowed, this feature must also be false.

There is no evidence that owners must participate in a hotel rental program. Since the building does not allow typical short-term rentals, mandatory hotel-pool participation is false.

The available remarks and MLS fields do not clearly indicate any fee simple units (no 'fee simple' or 'FS' mentions in 11 listings). Building-level presence of fee simple units remains unknown based on current data.

No listings mention leasehold terms or lease expiration, and the MLS tenure coding does not clearly show LH for any unit. As a result, it is not possible to determine from current data whether the building has leasehold units.

No specific lease-expiry year was found, and the remarks explicitly identify at least one residence as fee-simple. Because no applicable leasehold expiration or renewal date is mentioned, the value is null.

The remarks were searched for explicit VA-related language, including "VA approved," "VA financing," and "VA loans accepted." None was found, so there is no public-remark evidence that the building is VA loan approved.

Several listings directly describe the building as 100% insured. These repeated explicit statements satisfy the fully insured definition and provide high-confidence evidence that the HOA has full building insurance coverage.

In 11 listings, the fire-sprinkler amenity is consistently left unchecked and no remarks mention sprinklers despite detailed amenity descriptions. This strongly suggests the building lacks a common fire sprinkler system.

The remarks were searched for explicit fire/life safety evaluation or certification language, including FLSE and passed fire inspection references. Nothing was found, so this feature is recorded as false with limited confidence based on the absence of supporting remarks.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Ocean views are strongly documented across the building, appearing in 17 of 18 current listings. Remarks from multiple listings and apparent agents explicitly describe ocean views, including ocean-facing lanais and views of Waikiki Beach, so this is not merely an isolated checkbox entry.

Mountain views are documented in 12 of 20 current MLS listings and are reinforced by multiple remarks from different listings. Key phrases include "stunning ocean/mountain/city views" and "mountain views from bedroom," indicating the feature is genuinely available in the building rather than solely a copied checkbox.

A renovated end unit is described as having 'even Diamond Head views from side windows,' indicating at least some stack/orientation in the building sees Diamond Head. This is reinforced by 2 of 11 MLS entries checking DIAMOND HEAD as a view option.

City views are documented in 15 of 20 current MLS listings and supported by several detailed remarks. Examples include "city and mountain views," "ocean/mountain/city views," and a high-floor unit offering "panoramic views," showing strong evidence across multiple listings.

Listings describe 'ocean views' and 'views of Waikiki Beach’s famous surf areas' but never explicitly mention coastal or coastline panoramas. Given this and just one MLS record tagging COASTLINE, the evidence does not clearly support coastline views as a separate, notable attribute.

The building is described in terms of ocean, mountain, city, and Diamond Head views, with amenities like a pool and lounge areas but no garden-view language. With 0 of 11 MLS entries tagging GARDEN, garden views do not appear to be a notable feature here.

While none of the narrative remarks call out golf course or fairway views, 2 of 11 MLS entries checked GOLF COURSE as a view. This suggests that at least some units, likely on certain orientations or floors, may see the nearby golf course, though the evidence is based solely on MLS checkboxes.

Across all provided remarks, views are described as ocean, mountain, city, and Diamond Head, but never as marina, harbor, or canal. With 0 of 11 MLS entries checking MARINA/HARBOR, there is strong evidence that marina views are not a characteristic of this building.

Sunrise views are indicated in 8 of 17 current listings, although the supplied public remarks do not explicitly use phrases such as "sunrise view" or "eastern exposure." The evidence is moderate and primarily checkbox/view-description based rather than supported by detailed remarks.

Sunset views are indicated in 6 of 17 current listings, with no listings marked NONE. Public remarks do not clearly describe sunset views or western exposure, so this remains moderate-confidence evidence based mainly on current MLS view descriptions.

None of the marketing language or MLS data suggests that any units overlook a cemetery. With zero MLS tags and no narrative mentions, cemetery views can be confidently ruled out for this building.

I searched for Friday night fireworks, watching fireworks from a lanai, and seeing fireworks from a unit or building. The remarks discuss ocean, mountain, city, and beach views but contain no qualifying fireworks-view statement.

No analysis available

The building rules are clearly described in at least one listing as 'no pets allowed,' with no other agent suggesting pets are permitted. This explicit policy language, repeated without contradiction, indicates pets are not allowed in the building.

At least 9 listings explicitly mention an on-site or resident manager, including "resident manager," "on-site management," and "onsite building manager." The repeated confirmation across multiple listings and agents, combined with high historical confidence and 11/20 MLS RESMAN entries, strongly supports that the building has a resident manager.

Listings market the property as condos suitable for second homes or investment with a '30 day minimum rental policy,' but never use terms like 'condotel' or describe hotel management or a front desk. This consistent framing supports that the building is not operated as a condotel.

The building is consistently described as a condominium with deeded parking and standard condo association fees, not as a cooperative. The lack of any 'co-op' or 'cooperative' terminology in both MLS data and remarks across all listings indicates it is not a co-op.