Waikiki Park Heights

Every one of the 11 listings reports the building as built in 1974, with no conflicting information in the remarks. This consistent MLS data strongly supports 1974 as the correct year built.

Listings reference a 'corner unit on 21st floor' and no units above that level. With no remarks indicating a higher or 'top' floor, we infer the building has 21 floors based on the highest observed unit floor.

No listing remarks state how many units are in the building, and the MLS unit count field is unusable (all zeros). The total number of units in this building cannot be reliably determined from the available data.

I searched for explicit owner-occupancy references such as a percentage or phrases like "highly owner occupied" and found none. Since the current value already exists and the remarks do not confirm or contradict it, the current 25% is kept.

I searched the remarks for an explicit elevator number such as "2 elevators" or "multiple elevators" and found none. The listings do confirm the building has elevators, but not how many, so the current value is kept.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Central A/C is repeatedly confirmed in the public remarks, including phrases like "central A/C," "new central A/C," and "Central Air-Conditioning." The current MLS history is also highly consistent, so this appears to be a true building feature included in the fees.

Strong evidence across the listings supports cable being included. One remark explicitly states the association fee includes "cable TV," and the historical MLS data is highly consistent with CABTV checked in nearly all records. This looks like a stable building-level inclusion rather than a one-off agent comment.

The evidence for common-area expenses being included is fairly strong, though less explicit than utilities like water or electricity. One listing says the fee includes "other common expenses," and several remarks reference shared building costs/amenities, aligning with the historical MLS pattern.

Across all provided remarks, there is no mention of co-op status or cooperative taxes being included in fees, and COOTAX is unchecked in every current MLS record. This strongly supports that cooperative taxes are not part of the association fee for this building.

Electricity is repeatedly and directly confirmed in the remarks, with phrases like "maintenance fee includes electricity" and "all utilities including electricity are included." The MLS history is almost unanimous, making this a very high-confidence building-level inclusion.

Several listings carefully enumerate the utilities included in the HOA, and gas is never mentioned, while other utilities are repeatedly listed by name. Combined with GAS being unchecked in all MLS entries, this strongly indicates that gas is not included in the maintenance fees (and likely not provided at all).

Hot water appears to be included in the maintenance fee. The clearest support is the remark stating the association fee includes "hot water," and the MLS history is consistently positive as well. There is no evidence here of individual water heaters contradicting this.

Internet service is clearly supported by the listings. One remark explicitly lists "internet" among included utilities, and the historical MLS data is consistently favorable. This looks like a genuine amenity included in the building fees.

Across all remarks, amenities like pool, security, laundry, and surfboard storage are highlighted, but there is no reference to any marina or boat-related fees. With MARINA unchecked in all MLS records, it is very likely that marina access or fees are not included in the maintenance costs.

Sewer inclusion is directly confirmed in the remarks, including the statement that the association fee includes "sewer." The MLS history is also highly consistent, so this is strong building-level evidence.

Water is one of the strongest-supported inclusions in the building. Several remarks explicitly say water is included, and the MLS records are highly consistent. This is not likely a copy-paste error given the repeated confirmation across listings.

Multiple agents describe the building’s amenities (saltwater pool, patio/deck, community laundry, surfboard racks, etc.) without any reference to BBQ or grilling facilities. The single MLS BBQ checkbox appears to be an outlier, so the building is treated as not having a BBQ area.

Remarks for one unit clearly state that the building has 'multiple bike/moped racks,' which is explicit bicycle storage. This is a common-area amenity, so buyers seeking buildings with bike storage would find it available here despite its absence in MLS checkboxes.

Remarks emphasize proximity to Waikiki Beach and surfing, not direct dock or marina access. The total absence of boat-related amenities and MLS support confirms there is no boat dock associated with the building.

Parking details focus on covered stalls and rental availability, but there is no reference to any car wash facility. The absence of both remarks and MLS indication supports that there is no car wash amenity.

The building is described as a condo tower with pool, laundry, security, and an on-site restaurant, but there is no hint of a separate clubhouse facility. The consistent lack of mention and MLS data indicate no clubhouse.

No listing advertises concierge or front-desk services, despite detailed descriptions of other amenities. Given the consistent absence of this feature in both remarks and MLS checkboxes, the building appears not to have concierge service.

At least one listing notes that pets are not allowed, and none advertise any dog exercise area. Given the non-pet-friendly policy and lack of MLS indication, a dog park is effectively ruled out.

Remarks consistently describe security guards and resident/site managers but never mention a doorman or lobby attendant. With the doorman checkbox absent in all MLS entries, it is very likely the building does not offer doorman service.

Across 11 listings, agents consistently list amenities such as pool, laundry, security, and Hy’s Steak House but never mention any gym or fitness facility. With the MLS exercise-room amenity unchecked in all cases, this strongly indicates the building does not offer an exercise room.

Even though this is a well-located Waikiki building, agents do not advertise any limousine or courtesy car service. Given that such a luxury feature would typically be highlighted, it is very likely not offered here.

Agents do not advertise any community or conference room among the shared amenities. With no MLS support, it is very likely the building does not offer a meeting room.

Multiple listings indicate a patio/deck amenity, and one explicitly states: 'Amenities include a salt water pool, patio/deck, community laundry, surfboard racks, and resident manager.' The consistency between MLS checkboxes and detailed remarks across different agents strongly supports that the building offers a patio/deck area.

Remarks emphasize proximity to beaches, parks, and city life but do not identify a dedicated jogging or walking path as part of the building. This suggests the building does not offer its own jogging path.

Across detailed amenity lists, there is no reference to any kids’ play area or playground. The consistent omission and MLS data indicate there is no playground.

Across all remarks, outdoor space is described only as lanais and a pool, with no reference to yards or enclosed ground-level outdoor areas. Combined with 0/11 MLS entries for private yard, this strongly indicates the building does not offer private yard space as an amenity.

Agents do not advertise any golf-related amenities, focusing instead on the pool and urban location. This, combined with the lack of MLS checkmarks, shows there is no putting green.

Listings emphasize a saltwater pool, patio/deck, and lounge areas but do not describe a broader recreation or amenity area. Given the lack of explicit mention and no MLS checkmarks, a formal recreation area is unlikely.

Amenity descriptions focus on the saltwater pool, patio/deck, lounge areas, and on-site restaurant, without any reference to a dedicated recreation or game room. The consistent MLS omission supports that a recreation room is not present.

This building clearly has an on-site restaurant. Multiple remarks across the listings mention Hy’s Steak House on the ground floor or “on site,” appearing in many different listings and agent writeups rather than a single source. The evidence is consistent and strongly supports the restaurant amenity.

Amenity descriptions are focused on the pool area, patio/deck, and units’ private lanais, with no indication of a shared rooftop space. This absence across many listings suggests there is no rooftop amenity.

Agents highlight the pool, laundry, security, surfboard storage, and on-site restaurant but never a sauna or steam facility. The lack of any mention across many listings makes it very likely that no sauna is present.

At least two listings describe dedicated surfboard storage facilities, including a 'surfboard storage locker' and 'surfboard racks.' These are building-level locker amenities available to residents, so the building should be treated as offering storage units/lockers even though agents are not checking the storage box in the MLS.

This feature is explicitly confirmed in the remarks. Multiple listings reference surfboard storage, including a surfboard storage locker and secured surfboard racks.

Agents describe location, pool, laundry, security, and on-site restaurant but never mention tennis facilities. Combined with the absence of the MLS tennis-court amenity, this strongly indicates there is no tennis court.

Trash chute appears to be supported by the MLS amenity checkbox data, with 14 of 16 recent listings marked TRACHU. However, none of the provided remarks explicitly describe a trash chute system, so this is supported more by listing metadata than by narrative confirmation. The evidence is suggestive but not as strong as the restaurant feature.

Parking is consistently described as deeded or rentable covered stalls and guest parking managed by security, with no mention of valet services. The absence of any 'valet' references in both checkboxes and remarks across many listings supports that there is no valet amenity at this building.

Listings emphasize the building’s central Waikiki location and access to surrounding streets and shops without referencing gates or perimeter fencing. With no MLS indication of gated or walled grounds, it is very unlikely that the property has a enclosing wall or fence as a marketed feature.

Amenity lists refer only to a saltwater pool, with no suggestion of an accompanying spa or whirlpool. This consistent pattern and MLS data indicate there is no whirlpool/hot tub facility.

Pool is strongly supported across the remarks: roughly 10+ of the provided listings explicitly mention a pool, including phrases like "pool," "sparkling swimming pool," "saltwater pool," and "heated saltwater pool." This appears consistent across multiple agents and time periods, not just a one-off copy-paste entry, and aligns with the historical MLS amenities showing POOL on all listings.

At least one listing clearly describes the building amenity as a 'heated saltwater pool', while several others refer to the same saltwater pool without specifying temperature. Because amenities are shared building-wide and no listing suggests a separate unheated pool, the evidence supports that the building’s pool is heated. The single explicit 'heated' remark is detailed and consistent with the broader amenity descriptions.

This feature is strongly supported by repeated explicit mentions across multiple listings. The pool is directly described as saltwater/salt water in several remarks.

Multiple current listings explicitly mention in-unit laundry — e.g., 'washer and dryer in unit' and 'Washer/Dryer is in the unit' appear in at least 3 different unit remarks. This confirms prior high-confidence MLS data indicating some units (notably 3-bedroom corner units) include in-unit washers and dryers; evidence is consistent across multiple listings rather than only a single ad.

Strong building-level evidence for shared laundry. At least 4-5 public remarks explicitly mention 'community laundry,' including phrases like 'Amenities include ... community laundry' and 'Building amenities include ... community laundry,' which aligns with the prior high-confidence MLS checkbox data. This appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.

I looked for explicit paid-laundry references such as coin laundry, coin-op, card-operated machines, or quarters required. The remarks mention community laundry, but nothing indicates that it requires payment.

I searched for language like laundry on each floor, laundry room on every floor, or floor-by-floor laundry, but found none. The remarks only mention community laundry as an amenity, not its location by floor.

Strong evidence that the building provides parking: at least 11 separate listing remarks mention parking (phrases include "assigned parking stall", "deeded and covered parking spot", "1 assigned covered parking", "separately deeded covered parking stall", and "guest parking"). Remarks also note parking rental and wait lists, and several listings state not all units are deeded with parking, indicating parking exists but may be unit-specific. This consistency across multiple agents and listings yields high confidence that the building offers parking.

Strong evidence across multiple listings confirms assigned parking in the building. Remarks explicitly say 'one assigned parking,' 'your very own assigned parking stall,' '1 assigned covered parking stall,' and 'separately deeded covered parking stall,' indicating this is a real building-level offering rather than a one-off copy-paste error.

Multiple listings explicitly mention covered parking, with phrases like 'one covered parking stall,' '1 assigned covered parking stall,' 'deeded and covered parking spot,' and 'separately deeded covered parking stall.' The consistency across several remarks and agents makes the covered-parking feature highly reliable for this building.

Multiple listings directly confirm deeded parking, including covered stalls. One listing also notes not all units are deeded with parking, which reinforces that deeded parking exists for some units.

Across 11 listings with detailed amenity descriptions, there is no reference to EV or electric vehicle charging, and the EVCHRG field is never selected in MLS data. This consistent absence makes it highly likely that the building does not provide EV charging stations at this time.

The listings show that parking is not included and is charged separately, but the amount varies by listing/unit. I used the clearest explicit fee from the remarks: $193/month.

Guest parking is explicitly referenced in the public remarks: 'Residents enjoy... guest parking' and 'Guest parking from 8:00am to 4:30pm see security to register.' These clear, agent-written statements indicate the building provides guest/visitor parking (with registration/hours), so include the feature.

Listings emphasize building security (24-hour security, keyed elevator, extra secure building) but never mention a gated or card-controlled garage, and SECENT is unchecked for all units. This pattern indicates that while the building is secure, the parking itself is not described as having a distinct secured entry system.

Neither MLS data nor remarks reference tandem stalls, despite multiple detailed descriptions of parking arrangements (assigned, deeded, covered, rental, guest). The lack of any mention supports the conclusion that tandem parking is not a feature of this building.

Across all listings, there is no mention of valet or attended parking, and the VALET field is never selected in MLS data. Given how consistently amenities are otherwise marketed, this strongly suggests the building does not provide valet parking.

The remarks clearly indicate a parking waitlist system. This appears alongside parking rental language, confirming parking access is managed through a waitlist process.

A public remark specifically notes that the building 'has 24 hour security, keyed elevator,' which directly matches the keyed elevator feature definition. Even though the generic elevator amenity is not checked in MLS, the explicit remark provides strong evidence this secure elevator access exists.

I searched for card/fob access wording such as key card access, card reader, electronic entry, or keycard access. The remarks say the building is secure, but do not mention a card-based security system.

Strong, repeated evidence that Waikiki Park Heights has security guard/security service. Multiple listings mention it explicitly, including "24 hr. security" and "24hour security," and several others describe the building as "secure" or "extra secure." This appears consistent across multiple agents and aligns with the historically high MLS checkbox rate, so the feature should be kept as present.

I looked for direct references to patrol service or roving security and found none. The building clearly has security and a secure environment, but patrol service is not mentioned.

Across all provided listings, there are no references to cameras or video surveillance, only to guards and general 'security'. With SECSYS absent from every MLS record, it appears the building does not advertise a dedicated video security system.

Central A/C is strongly supported by the remarks: at least 9+ listings explicitly mention "central A/C" or "Central Air-Conditioning," including phrases like "new central A/C," "Central Air-Conditioning," and "new A/C system." The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, not just copy-paste checkbox data, and matches the prior high-confidence MLS history.

Across all provided listings, air conditioning is only described as 'central A/C' or via central-coil upgrades, with no references to ductless, split, or mini-split systems and no split AC boxes checked in the MLS. Given the building’s central system and utility-included HOA structure, it is very unlikely that split AC is a building feature.

Numerous listings emphasize central A/C and recent central A/C coil or system upgrades, and none mention window, wall, or room air conditioners. MLS data likewise shows no window AC inclusions, so window units are very unlikely to be a feature of this building.

Construction concrete is supported by the building’s historical MLS record, where current data shows 16/16 listings with construction_materials = CONCRE. The public remarks are about the same Waikiki Park Heights building and do not contradict this, so the concrete construction classification remains very strong and consistent across listings.

Across both historical and current data, double-wall construction appears in only a small minority of MLS checkboxes (1/11 previously, 2/12 currently) and is never described in the remarks. Given the strong, consistent evidence for concrete high-rise construction, double-wall is likely an agent input mistake rather than a true building feature.

Hollow tile construction is never checked in MLS (0 of 11) and never mentioned in remarks. This provides strong negative evidence that the building is not characterized as hollow-tile construction.

None of the 11 MLS listings use the masonry/stucco construction checkbox. With consistent selection of concrete and no supporting remarks, it is unlikely the building is classified as masonry-stucco construction.

None of the 11 MLS listings check the steel-frame box, while all agree on concrete. With no remarks mentioning steel framing, the best-supported interpretation is that the building is not classified as steel-frame construction in MLS.

The SLAB construction option is never checked in the available MLS data (0 of 11), and listing remarks are silent about slab foundations. In the absence of any explicit MLS or remarks support, the building is not classified as 'slab' in this dataset.

No analysis available

Zero of 11 recent MLS listings mark wood frame, and all instead mark concrete. Combined with the obvious high-rise condo form in Waikiki, this strongly indicates the building is not wood-frame construction.

The above-ground construction box is checked in a minority (3 of 11) of MLS listings and is not corroborated by any remarks. Given the inconsistency for a building-level trait, it is more likely an MLS data quirk than a reliable feature.

No recent listings indicate brick construction in the MLS data. The building presents and is described as a typical Waikiki high-rise condo, making brick construction highly unlikely.

Single-wall construction, common in older low-rise Hawaii homes, is not indicated in any of the 11 MLS records and would be incompatible with a high-rise tower of this type. This makes single-wall construction virtually impossible here.

I searched for STR-related language such as short-term rental allowed, vacation rental, TVU/NUC, or hotel-style rental terms. Instead, the listings consistently indicate a 30-day minimum, which means short-term rentals are not allowed.

I looked for hotel pool wording such as hotel rental program, managed by hotel, or branded pool participation, but found none. Because the building does not allow short-term rentals, a hotel pool would also not apply here.

I searched for mandatory rental-pool language such as required participation, cannot opt out, or must rent through a program, but found nothing. The remarks support standard ownership rather than a compulsory hotel-rental arrangement.

The available remarks and MLS fields do not clearly indicate any fee simple units (no 'fee simple' or 'FS' mentions in 11 listings). Building-level presence of fee simple units remains unknown based on current data.

No listings mention leasehold terms or lease expiration, and the MLS tenure coding does not clearly show LH for any unit. As a result, it is not possible to determine from current data whether the building has leasehold units.

I looked for leasehold language such as lease expiration, ground lease end dates, or renewal terms, but found nothing. The remarks instead say "fee-simple," which suggests this is not a leasehold property, so no lease expiry year is available.

I searched the public remarks for phrases like "VA approved," "VA financing," and "VA loans accepted," but found none. With no public-remarks evidence, this is treated as not established from the listings.

The remarks directly say the building is "100% insured," which matches the definition of fully insured / walls-in coverage. This is strong explicit evidence, so the feature is set to true with very high confidence.

In 11 listings, the fire-sprinkler amenity is consistently left unchecked and no remarks mention sprinklers despite detailed amenity descriptions. This strongly suggests the building lacks a common fire sprinkler system.

I looked for phrases like "FLSE passed," "fire life safety evaluation passed," "fire safety certified," or "passed fire inspection." None appeared in the public remarks, so there is no evidence to mark this as true.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Strong building-level evidence for ocean views across many listings and multiple agents. Current remarks explicitly mention ocean views in numerous units, including 'ocean and panoramic views' and 'check the surf from your lanai,' which aligns with the historical MLS pattern.

There is solid evidence that some units offer mountain views. The remarks explicitly mention 'ocean/mountain/city views' and 'mountain views from bedroom,' confirming the MLS pattern that this is a building-level view option for some residences.

A renovated end unit is described as having 'even Diamond Head views from side windows,' indicating at least some stack/orientation in the building sees Diamond Head. This is reinforced by 2 of 11 MLS entries checking DIAMOND HEAD as a view option.

City views are supported by both the historical MLS data and current remarks. Multiple listings reference the building being in the heart of Waikiki and explicitly call out 'city' or 'city life,' confirming this as an available view for some units.

Listings describe 'ocean views' and 'views of Waikiki Beach’s famous surf areas' but never explicitly mention coastal or coastline panoramas. Given this and just one MLS record tagging COASTLINE, the evidence does not clearly support coastline views as a separate, notable attribute.

The building is described in terms of ocean, mountain, city, and Diamond Head views, with amenities like a pool and lounge areas but no garden-view language. With 0 of 11 MLS entries tagging GARDEN, garden views do not appear to be a notable feature here.

While none of the narrative remarks call out golf course or fairway views, 2 of 11 MLS entries checked GOLF COURSE as a view. This suggests that at least some units, likely on certain orientations or floors, may see the nearby golf course, though the evidence is based solely on MLS checkboxes.

Across all provided remarks, views are described as ocean, mountain, city, and Diamond Head, but never as marina, harbor, or canal. With 0 of 11 MLS entries checking MARINA/HARBOR, there is strong evidence that marina views are not a characteristic of this building.

Moderate evidence that some units have sunrise/eastern exposure: 7 of 15 listings include SUNRIS in view_descriptions and remarks reference east-side orientation and Diamond Head (east) views. Explicit 'sunrise' phrasing is sparse, so confidence is moderate but sufficient to indicate some units offer sunrise views.

Limited but present evidence for sunset/western exposure: 5 of 15 listings include SUNSET in view_descriptions. Remarks do not frequently mention 'sunset' or 'western exposure', so this is treated as implied evidence and given moderate confidence that some units can offer sunset views.

None of the marketing language or MLS data suggests that any units overlook a cemetery. With zero MLS tags and no narrative mentions, cemetery views can be confidently ruled out for this building.

I searched for explicit language like watching Friday night fireworks from the lanai, unit, or building. The remarks discuss ocean and city views, but do not mention fireworks views.

No analysis available

The building rules are clearly described in at least one listing as 'no pets allowed,' with no other agent suggesting pets are permitted. This explicit policy language, repeated without contradiction, indicates pets are not allowed in the building.

Strong multi-listing evidence supports a resident manager/on-site management presence at Waikiki Park Heights. Across many remarks, agents explicitly describe the building as having "on-site management," "on-site manager," "onsite building manager," and "resident manager," which appears consistent rather than a one-off copy/paste error. This feature is confirmed by multiple listings and aligns with the prior high-confidence MLS history.

Listings market the property as condos suitable for second homes or investment with a '30 day minimum rental policy,' but never use terms like 'condotel' or describe hotel management or a front desk. This consistent framing supports that the building is not operated as a condotel.

The building is consistently described as a condominium with deeded parking and standard condo association fees, not as a cooperative. The lack of any 'co-op' or 'cooperative' terminology in both MLS data and remarks across all listings indicates it is not a co-op.