Waikiki Park Heights

Every one of the 11 listings reports the building as built in 1974, with no conflicting information in the remarks. This consistent MLS data strongly supports 1974 as the correct year built.

Listings reference a 'corner unit on 21st floor' and no units above that level. With no remarks indicating a higher or 'top' floor, we infer the building has 21 floors based on the highest observed unit floor.

No listing remarks state how many units are in the building, and the MLS unit count field is unusable (all zeros). The total number of units in this building cannot be reliably determined from the available data.

I searched for explicit owner-occupancy references such as percentages or descriptive phrases like "highly owner occupied," but found none. Since a current value exists and there is no remark evidence to confirm or contradict it, I kept 25.0 with low confidence.

I looked for explicit elevator counts such as "4 elevators," "multiple elevators," or a stated number, but found none. The remarks do confirm elevator service exists, so I kept the current value of 2 with low confidence.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

High-confidence evidence that central air is part of the building: 13 of 15 MLS records check ACCEN and numerous remarks state 'central A/C' or 'Central Air-Conditioning.' Multiple listings describe units as having 'new central A/C' or 'central AC included,' corroborating the MLS checkboxes.

Strong, consistent evidence across listings that cable is included: 14 of 15 MLS records list CABTV and several remarks explicitly state the HOA fee 'includes cable TV' or list 'cable' among included utilities. The language appears across multiple agent remarks, indicating broad agreement rather than an isolated copy/paste error.

Consistent evidence that maintenance fees cover other common expenses: 10 of 15 MLS records list OTCOEX and multiple remarks state fees include 'other utilities' or 'other common expenses.' The phrasing appears repeatedly across different listings and agents.

Across all provided remarks, there is no mention of co-op status or cooperative taxes being included in fees, and COOTAX is unchecked in every current MLS record. This strongly supports that cooperative taxes are not part of the association fee for this building.

Very strong evidence electricity is included: 14 of 15 MLS records mark ELECTR and many remarks clearly state 'electricity included' or 'all utilities included.' The consistency across listings and agent remarks indicates this is a building-level included utility.

Several listings carefully enumerate the utilities included in the HOA, and gas is never mentioned, while other utilities are repeatedly listed by name. Combined with GAS being unchecked in all MLS entries, this strongly indicates that gas is not included in the maintenance fees (and likely not provided at all).

Good evidence hot water is included in maintenance: 11 of 15 MLS records list HOTWAT and remarks explicitly name 'hot water' among included utilities in some listings. No listings indicate in-unit water heaters (WTRHTR), strengthening the case that hot water is provided and covered by the HOA.

Internet service is commonly reported included: 9 of 14 MLS records list INTSER and several remarks state the HOA fee 'includes internet' or list 'all utilities: ... internet,' indicating building-level inclusion.

Across all remarks, amenities like pool, security, laundry, and surfboard storage are highlighted, but there is no reference to any marina or boat-related fees. With MARINA unchecked in all MLS records, it is very likely that marina access or fees are not included in the maintenance costs.

Strong, consistent evidence that sewer is included: 13 of 15 MLS records include SEWER and several public remarks explicitly list sewer among the utilities covered by the HOA/maintenance fee. Multiple agents independently note sewer is included.

Very strong evidence water is included: 14 of 15 MLS records mark WATER and many remarks explicitly list 'water' among included utilities. The consistency across listings and phrasing in remarks indicates water is a standard included utility in this building.

Multiple agents describe the building’s amenities (saltwater pool, patio/deck, community laundry, surfboard racks, etc.) without any reference to BBQ or grilling facilities. The single MLS BBQ checkbox appears to be an outlier, so the building is treated as not having a BBQ area.

Remarks for one unit clearly state that the building has 'multiple bike/moped racks,' which is explicit bicycle storage. This is a common-area amenity, so buyers seeking buildings with bike storage would find it available here despite its absence in MLS checkboxes.

Remarks emphasize proximity to Waikiki Beach and surfing, not direct dock or marina access. The total absence of boat-related amenities and MLS support confirms there is no boat dock associated with the building.

Parking details focus on covered stalls and rental availability, but there is no reference to any car wash facility. The absence of both remarks and MLS indication supports that there is no car wash amenity.

The building is described as a condo tower with pool, laundry, security, and an on-site restaurant, but there is no hint of a separate clubhouse facility. The consistent lack of mention and MLS data indicate no clubhouse.

No listing advertises concierge or front-desk services, despite detailed descriptions of other amenities. Given the consistent absence of this feature in both remarks and MLS checkboxes, the building appears not to have concierge service.

At least one listing notes that pets are not allowed, and none advertise any dog exercise area. Given the non-pet-friendly policy and lack of MLS indication, a dog park is effectively ruled out.

Remarks consistently describe security guards and resident/site managers but never mention a doorman or lobby attendant. With the doorman checkbox absent in all MLS entries, it is very likely the building does not offer doorman service.

Across 11 listings, agents consistently list amenities such as pool, laundry, security, and Hy’s Steak House but never mention any gym or fitness facility. With the MLS exercise-room amenity unchecked in all cases, this strongly indicates the building does not offer an exercise room.

Even though this is a well-located Waikiki building, agents do not advertise any limousine or courtesy car service. Given that such a luxury feature would typically be highlighted, it is very likely not offered here.

Agents do not advertise any community or conference room among the shared amenities. With no MLS support, it is very likely the building does not offer a meeting room.

Multiple listings indicate a patio/deck amenity, and one explicitly states: 'Amenities include a salt water pool, patio/deck, community laundry, surfboard racks, and resident manager.' The consistency between MLS checkboxes and detailed remarks across different agents strongly supports that the building offers a patio/deck area.

Remarks emphasize proximity to beaches, parks, and city life but do not identify a dedicated jogging or walking path as part of the building. This suggests the building does not offer its own jogging path.

Across detailed amenity lists, there is no reference to any kids’ play area or playground. The consistent omission and MLS data indicate there is no playground.

Across all remarks, outdoor space is described only as lanais and a pool, with no reference to yards or enclosed ground-level outdoor areas. Combined with 0/11 MLS entries for private yard, this strongly indicates the building does not offer private yard space as an amenity.

Agents do not advertise any golf-related amenities, focusing instead on the pool and urban location. This, combined with the lack of MLS checkmarks, shows there is no putting green.

Listings emphasize a saltwater pool, patio/deck, and lounge areas but do not describe a broader recreation or amenity area. Given the lack of explicit mention and no MLS checkmarks, a formal recreation area is unlikely.

Amenity descriptions focus on the saltwater pool, patio/deck, lounge areas, and on-site restaurant, without any reference to a dedicated recreation or game room. The consistent MLS omission supports that a recreation room is not present.

Strong, consistent evidence that the building has an on-site restaurant: numerous listing remarks (10+ occurrences across the provided remarks) explicitly reference Hy's Steak House (phrases include 'Famous Hy’s Steak House on site,' 'Hy’s Steakhouse right at your doorstep,' and 'home to the famous Hy's Steakhouse'). This is corroborated by historical high-confidence MLS data and appears across multiple agents' remarks rather than being a single copy-paste error.

Amenity descriptions are focused on the pool area, patio/deck, and units’ private lanais, with no indication of a shared rooftop space. This absence across many listings suggests there is no rooftop amenity.

Agents highlight the pool, laundry, security, surfboard storage, and on-site restaurant but never a sauna or steam facility. The lack of any mention across many listings makes it very likely that no sauna is present.

At least two listings describe dedicated surfboard storage facilities, including a 'surfboard storage locker' and 'surfboard racks.' These are building-level locker amenities available to residents, so the building should be treated as offering storage units/lockers even though agents are not checking the storage box in the MLS.

This feature is explicitly confirmed in the remarks. The building offers surfboard storage, with references to a surfboard storage locker and secured surfboard racks.

Agents describe location, pool, laundry, security, and on-site restaurant but never mention tennis facilities. Combined with the absence of the MLS tennis-court amenity, this strongly indicates there is no tennis court.

13 of 15 recent MLS listings for this building include the TRACHU amenity checkbox, which implies a building trash/garbage chute. None of the provided public remarks mention a trash/garbage/refuse chute, so evidence is primarily from MLS checkbox entries and may reflect agent copy/paste; confidence is moderate (0.75).

Parking is consistently described as deeded or rentable covered stalls and guest parking managed by security, with no mention of valet services. The absence of any 'valet' references in both checkboxes and remarks across many listings supports that there is no valet amenity at this building.

Listings emphasize the building’s central Waikiki location and access to surrounding streets and shops without referencing gates or perimeter fencing. With no MLS indication of gated or walled grounds, it is very unlikely that the property has a enclosing wall or fence as a marketed feature.

Amenity lists refer only to a saltwater pool, with no suggestion of an accompanying spa or whirlpool. This consistent pattern and MLS data indicate there is no whirlpool/hot tub facility.

Strong evidence the building has a shared pool: MLS checkbox shows POOL on all 15 listings and multiple agent remarks repeatedly mention the amenity (phrases include 'sparkling swimming pool', 'heated saltwater pool', and 'saltwater pool'). Mentions appear across listings from different agents and in multiple public remarks, indicating the pool is a building-wide feature rather than a single-unit amenity.

At least one listing clearly describes the building amenity as a 'heated saltwater pool', while several others refer to the same saltwater pool without specifying temperature. Because amenities are shared building-wide and no listing suggests a separate unheated pool, the evidence supports that the building’s pool is heated. The single explicit 'heated' remark is detailed and consistent with the broader amenity descriptions.

This feature is strongly supported by repeated explicit mentions across multiple listings. The building’s pool is described as saltwater/salt water/heated saltwater, so this is a clear match.

Multiple current listings explicitly mention in-unit laundry — e.g., 'washer and dryer in unit' and 'Washer/Dryer is in the unit' appear in at least 3 different unit remarks. This confirms prior high-confidence MLS data indicating some units (notably 3-bedroom corner units) include in-unit washers and dryers; evidence is consistent across multiple listings rather than only a single ad.

Strong evidence that the building has shared laundry: 11/15 recent MLS listings list COMLAU and multiple agent remarks explicitly state 'community laundry' or 'building amenities include ... community laundry.' Mentions appear across several different listings/agents (e.g., 'Building amenities include ... community laundry' and 'Amenities include ... community laundry'), indicating the facility is a consistent building-level feature rather than an isolated error.

I looked for paid-laundry wording such as coin laundry, coin-op, card-operated machines, or quarters required, and found no such references. The remarks show community laundry is present, but they do not indicate that it requires payment.

I searched for language like laundry on each floor, floor-by-floor laundry, or laundry room on every floor and found none. The listings only confirm community laundry exists somewhere in the building, not that it is available on every floor.

Strong evidence that the building provides parking: at least 11 separate listing remarks mention parking (phrases include "assigned parking stall", "deeded and covered parking spot", "1 assigned covered parking", "separately deeded covered parking stall", and "guest parking"). Remarks also note parking rental and wait lists, and several listings state not all units are deeded with parking, indicating parking exists but may be unit-specific. This consistency across multiple agents and listings yields high confidence that the building offers parking.

Multiple listings explicitly state assigned or deeded parking: phrases include 'assigned parking stall', 'deeded and covered parking spot', and 'separately deeded covered parking stall'. These references appear across several agent remarks (at least 6 distinct mentions across the provided remarks), matching prior MLS checkbox history, indicating strong and consistent evidence that assigned parking is offered.

Multiple listings advertise covered stalls, including 'one covered parking stall', '1 assigned covered parking', and 'separately deeded covered parking stall'. With 6/12 current MLS entries also indicating covered or garage parking, there is strong evidence that the building provides covered parking options for some units and rentals.

The remarks clearly indicate deeded parking for some units, including explicit references to deeded covered stalls. One remark also notes that not all condos in the building are deeded with parking, so this appears unit-specific rather than universal.

Across 11 listings with detailed amenity descriptions, there is no reference to EV or electric vehicle charging, and the EVCHRG field is never selected in MLS data. This consistent absence makes it highly likely that the building does not provide EV charging stations at this time.

Public remarks confirm that parking carries a monthly fee when not included. Several amounts appear in the listings, so the fee varies by unit/listing; $193/month is the most explicit example found.

Guest parking is explicitly referenced in the public remarks: 'Residents enjoy... guest parking' and 'Guest parking from 8:00am to 4:30pm see security to register.' These clear, agent-written statements indicate the building provides guest/visitor parking (with registration/hours), so include the feature.

Listings emphasize building security (24-hour security, keyed elevator, extra secure building) but never mention a gated or card-controlled garage, and SECENT is unchecked for all units. This pattern indicates that while the building is secure, the parking itself is not described as having a distinct secured entry system.

Neither MLS data nor remarks reference tandem stalls, despite multiple detailed descriptions of parking arrangements (assigned, deeded, covered, rental, guest). The lack of any mention supports the conclusion that tandem parking is not a feature of this building.

Across all listings, there is no mention of valet or attended parking, and the VALET field is never selected in MLS data. Given how consistently amenities are otherwise marketed, this strongly suggests the building does not provide valet parking.

The listings explicitly describe parking as being available through a long wait list, which confirms a parking waitlist system. This is repeated alongside management-arranged parking rentals.

A public remark specifically notes that the building 'has 24 hour security, keyed elevator,' which directly matches the keyed elevator feature definition. Even though the generic elevator amenity is not checked in MLS, the explicit remark provides strong evidence this secure elevator access exists.

I searched for key card access, fob access, card readers, keycard entry, and similar wording. The listings describe a secure building, but they do not explicitly confirm a card/fob access system.

Strong evidence that the building provides security guard/24-hour security: historical MLS checkbox high (13/15) and multiple current listings mention security. At least 8 separate public-remark blocks reference security (phrases include 'secure building', 'security', '24 hr. security', and '24hour security'), and one notes guest parking registration with security—consistent across different listings and agents.

I looked for direct references to security patrol, patrolled building, or roving security and found none. The building clearly has security staff, but the public remarks do not specifically establish patrol service.

Across all provided listings, there are no references to cameras or video surveillance, only to guards and general 'security'. With SECSYS absent from every MLS record, it appears the building does not advertise a dedicated video security system.

Multiple current listing remarks explicitly reference building-level central air: phrases include "new central A/C", "Central Air-Conditioning", and "central AC". At least 11 of the provided 15 listing remarks mention central A/C, and historical MLS checkbox/inclusion data already indicated strong support (ACCEN/CENAC present in unit_features and ACCEN present in inclusions across listings), so evidence is strong across multiple agents and listings.

Across all provided listings, air conditioning is only described as 'central A/C' or via central-coil upgrades, with no references to ductless, split, or mini-split systems and no split AC boxes checked in the MLS. Given the building’s central system and utility-included HOA structure, it is very unlikely that split AC is a building feature.

Numerous listings emphasize central A/C and recent central A/C coil or system upgrades, and none mention window, wall, or room air conditioners. MLS data likewise shows no window AC inclusions, so window units are very unlikely to be a feature of this building.

All 15 current MLS listings (15/15) list construction_materials = 'CONCRE', and historical records show high confidence that Waikiki Park Heights is a concrete building. Public remarks do not explicitly mention construction materials (0/15 mention 'concrete'), but the unanimous MLS checkbox across multiple listings and prior high-confidence data provide strong, consistent evidence the building is concrete.

Across both historical and current data, double-wall construction appears in only a small minority of MLS checkboxes (1/11 previously, 2/12 currently) and is never described in the remarks. Given the strong, consistent evidence for concrete high-rise construction, double-wall is likely an agent input mistake rather than a true building feature.

Hollow tile construction is never checked in MLS (0 of 11) and never mentioned in remarks. This provides strong negative evidence that the building is not characterized as hollow-tile construction.

None of the 11 MLS listings use the masonry/stucco construction checkbox. With consistent selection of concrete and no supporting remarks, it is unlikely the building is classified as masonry-stucco construction.

None of the 11 MLS listings check the steel-frame box, while all agree on concrete. With no remarks mentioning steel framing, the best-supported interpretation is that the building is not classified as steel-frame construction in MLS.

The SLAB construction option is never checked in the available MLS data (0 of 11), and listing remarks are silent about slab foundations. In the absence of any explicit MLS or remarks support, the building is not classified as 'slab' in this dataset.

No analysis available

Zero of 11 recent MLS listings mark wood frame, and all instead mark concrete. Combined with the obvious high-rise condo form in Waikiki, this strongly indicates the building is not wood-frame construction.

The above-ground construction box is checked in a minority (3 of 11) of MLS listings and is not corroborated by any remarks. Given the inconsistency for a building-level trait, it is more likely an MLS data quirk than a reliable feature.

No recent listings indicate brick construction in the MLS data. The building presents and is described as a typical Waikiki high-rise condo, making brick construction highly unlikely.

Single-wall construction, common in older low-rise Hawaii homes, is not indicated in any of the 11 MLS records and would be incompatible with a high-rise tower of this type. This makes single-wall construction virtually impossible here.

The public remarks are explicit that rentals must be at least 30 days, which means short-term rentals are not allowed. I looked for STR language such as vacation rentals, NUC/TVU, or legal short-term rental references, but found none.

I searched for hotel pool language such as hotel rental program, managed by hotel, or branded pool participation, but found nothing. Because short-term rentals are not allowed, a hotel rental pool would also not apply here.

I looked for any indication that owners must participate in a rental pool, but there were no such mentions. The remarks support ordinary ownership/use rather than a required hotel rental arrangement.

The available remarks and MLS fields do not clearly indicate any fee simple units (no 'fee simple' or 'FS' mentions in 11 listings). Building-level presence of fee simple units remains unknown based on current data.

No listings mention leasehold terms or lease expiration, and the MLS tenure coding does not clearly show LH for any unit. As a result, it is not possible to determine from current data whether the building has leasehold units.

I searched for leasehold language such as "lease expires," "ground lease ends," and specific expiry years, but there were no references. The lease expiry year cannot be determined from these public remarks.

I searched the public remarks for any indication that VA financing is approved or accepted, but found none. With no public-remarks evidence, this is treated as not established from the listing text.

The listings directly state that the building is "100% insured," which matches the definition of fully insured/walls-in coverage. This is strong, explicit evidence, so confidence is very high.

In 11 listings, the fire-sprinkler amenity is consistently left unchecked and no remarks mention sprinklers despite detailed amenity descriptions. This strongly suggests the building lacks a common fire sprinkler system.

I searched the public remarks for fire/life safety compliance language and found no references. Because this feature is only determined from remarks and no current verified value was provided, I am leaving it as false with low confidence based on absence of evidence.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Strong evidence across multiple listings and agents: 14 of 15 listings list OCEAN in view_descriptions and many remarks explicitly say 'ocean view(s)' (examples: 'Gorgeous Ocen View!', 'unparalleled ocean views', 'overlooking the azure shimmering ocean'). This is consistent across multiple agents and high-confidence historical data, indicating the building offers ocean-view units.

Multiple listings reference mountain views: 8 of 15 listings have MOUNTA in view_descriptions and remarks note 'ocean/mountain/city views', 'mountain views from bedroom', and 'Diamond Head views'. Evidence is present across several agents and matches historical high confidence that some units have mountain views.

A renovated end unit is described as having 'even Diamond Head views from side windows,' indicating at least some stack/orientation in the building sees Diamond Head. This is reinforced by 2 of 11 MLS entries checking DIAMOND HEAD as a view option.

Clear building-level evidence for city views: 10 of 15 listings list CITY in view_descriptions and multiple remarks reference 'city' or 'city life' and proximity to downtown amenities, indicating that some units offer city views.

Listings describe 'ocean views' and 'views of Waikiki Beach’s famous surf areas' but never explicitly mention coastal or coastline panoramas. Given this and just one MLS record tagging COASTLINE, the evidence does not clearly support coastline views as a separate, notable attribute.

The building is described in terms of ocean, mountain, city, and Diamond Head views, with amenities like a pool and lounge areas but no garden-view language. With 0 of 11 MLS entries tagging GARDEN, garden views do not appear to be a notable feature here.

While none of the narrative remarks call out golf course or fairway views, 2 of 11 MLS entries checked GOLF COURSE as a view. This suggests that at least some units, likely on certain orientations or floors, may see the nearby golf course, though the evidence is based solely on MLS checkboxes.

Across all provided remarks, views are described as ocean, mountain, city, and Diamond Head, but never as marina, harbor, or canal. With 0 of 11 MLS entries checking MARINA/HARBOR, there is strong evidence that marina views are not a characteristic of this building.

Moderate evidence that some units have sunrise/eastern exposure: 7 of 15 listings include SUNRIS in view_descriptions and remarks reference east-side orientation and Diamond Head (east) views. Explicit 'sunrise' phrasing is sparse, so confidence is moderate but sufficient to indicate some units offer sunrise views.

Limited but present evidence for sunset/western exposure: 5 of 15 listings include SUNSET in view_descriptions. Remarks do not frequently mention 'sunset' or 'western exposure', so this is treated as implied evidence and given moderate confidence that some units can offer sunset views.

None of the marketing language or MLS data suggests that any units overlook a cemetery. With zero MLS tags and no narrative mentions, cemetery views can be confidently ruled out for this building.

I searched for explicit fireworks-view language such as watching fireworks from the lanai, unit, or building. The remarks only describe ocean, mountain, Diamond Head, city, and surf views, so there is no evidence for fireworks views.

No analysis available

The building rules are clearly described in at least one listing as 'no pets allowed,' with no other agent suggesting pets are permitted. This explicit policy language, repeated without contradiction, indicates pets are not allowed in the building.

Multiple listings for this building explicitly mention on-site management: phrases include 'on-site management', 'on-site manager', 'onsite building manager', 'site manager', and 'resident manager'. At least 6 separate public-remark entries reference an on-site/resident manager, matching prior MLS checkbox data (7/14). Evidence is consistent across different listings and agents, supporting inclusion of a resident manager feature.

Listings market the property as condos suitable for second homes or investment with a '30 day minimum rental policy,' but never use terms like 'condotel' or describe hotel management or a front desk. This consistent framing supports that the building is not operated as a condotel.

The building is consistently described as a condominium with deeded parking and standard condo association fees, not as a cooperative. The lack of any 'co-op' or 'cooperative' terminology in both MLS data and remarks across all listings indicates it is not a co-op.