Waikiki Park Heights

Every one of the 11 listings reports the building as built in 1974, with no conflicting information in the remarks. This consistent MLS data strongly supports 1974 as the correct year built.

Listings reference a 'corner unit on 21st floor' and no units above that level. With no remarks indicating a higher or 'top' floor, we infer the building has 21 floors based on the highest observed unit floor.

No listing remarks state how many units are in the building, and the MLS unit count field is unusable (all zeros). The total number of units in this building cannot be reliably determined from the available data.

No public remarks contained any owner-occupancy statements. Per the rules, when a current numeric value exists but remarks provide no confirmation, the existing value is kept with low confidence and noted as unverified by the remarks.

Remarks repeatedly reference elevators (e.g., "new elevators", "keyed elevator"), confirming elevator service. No explicit numeric statement (e.g., "2 elevators" or "4 elevators") was found, so the current value of 2 is retained per rules but with low confidence.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Central air conditioning is repeatedly mentioned: at least a dozen listings note 'central A/C' or 'Central Air-Conditioning' and several remarks tie it to unit/building features. Evidence is consistent across multiple agents and listings.

Strong evidence across listings that cable is included: 13 of 14 MLS records list CABTV and several remarks state the HOA/association fee "includes cable" or "cable TV." Multiple agents independently mention it and some remarks use identical phrasing, indicating consistent building-level inclusion.

The HOA/maintenance fee is described as covering 'other common expenses' or 'other utilities' in multiple remarks (9 of 14 MLS records mark OTCOEX), supporting inclusion of common-area electrical/expenses in the fee.

Across all provided remarks, there is no mention of co-op status or cooperative taxes being included in fees, and COOTAX is unchecked in every current MLS record. This strongly supports that cooperative taxes are not part of the association fee for this building.

Very strong and consistent evidence: electricity is listed in 13 of 14 MLS records and many remarks explicitly say 'electricity included' or 'all utilities: electricity...,' confirming electricity is covered by the association fee.

Several listings carefully enumerate the utilities included in the HOA, and gas is never mentioned, while other utilities are repeatedly listed by name. Combined with GAS being unchecked in all MLS entries, this strongly indicates that gas is not included in the maintenance fees (and likely not provided at all).

An explicit remark lists 'hot water' among the association-covered utilities, and MLS data consistently shows HOTWAT with no indication of individual water heaters. This strongly supports that building-supplied hot water is included in the fees.

Internet service is commonly reported included: 9 of 14 MLS records list INTSER and several remarks state the HOA fee 'includes internet' or list 'all utilities: ... internet,' indicating building-level inclusion.

Across all remarks, amenities like pool, security, laundry, and surfboard storage are highlighted, but there is no reference to any marina or boat-related fees. With MARINA unchecked in all MLS records, it is very likely that marina access or fees are not included in the maintenance costs.

Sewer is consistently documented: 12 of 14 MLS records include SEWER and several public remarks explicitly state sewer is included in the association/maintenance fees, supporting high confidence.

Very strong evidence that water is included: water is checked in 13 of 14 MLS records and multiple remarks explicitly list 'water' among included utilities (often within 'all utilities' phrasing), confirming building-level inclusion.

Multiple agents describe the building’s amenities (saltwater pool, patio/deck, community laundry, surfboard racks, etc.) without any reference to BBQ or grilling facilities. The single MLS BBQ checkbox appears to be an outlier, so the building is treated as not having a BBQ area.

Remarks for one unit clearly state that the building has 'multiple bike/moped racks,' which is explicit bicycle storage. This is a common-area amenity, so buyers seeking buildings with bike storage would find it available here despite its absence in MLS checkboxes.

Remarks emphasize proximity to Waikiki Beach and surfing, not direct dock or marina access. The total absence of boat-related amenities and MLS support confirms there is no boat dock associated with the building.

Parking details focus on covered stalls and rental availability, but there is no reference to any car wash facility. The absence of both remarks and MLS indication supports that there is no car wash amenity.

The building is described as a condo tower with pool, laundry, security, and an on-site restaurant, but there is no hint of a separate clubhouse facility. The consistent lack of mention and MLS data indicate no clubhouse.

No listing advertises concierge or front-desk services, despite detailed descriptions of other amenities. Given the consistent absence of this feature in both remarks and MLS checkboxes, the building appears not to have concierge service.

At least one listing notes that pets are not allowed, and none advertise any dog exercise area. Given the non-pet-friendly policy and lack of MLS indication, a dog park is effectively ruled out.

Remarks consistently describe security guards and resident/site managers but never mention a doorman or lobby attendant. With the doorman checkbox absent in all MLS entries, it is very likely the building does not offer doorman service.

Across 11 listings, agents consistently list amenities such as pool, laundry, security, and Hy’s Steak House but never mention any gym or fitness facility. With the MLS exercise-room amenity unchecked in all cases, this strongly indicates the building does not offer an exercise room.

Even though this is a well-located Waikiki building, agents do not advertise any limousine or courtesy car service. Given that such a luxury feature would typically be highlighted, it is very likely not offered here.

Agents do not advertise any community or conference room among the shared amenities. With no MLS support, it is very likely the building does not offer a meeting room.

Multiple listings indicate a patio/deck amenity, and one explicitly states: 'Amenities include a salt water pool, patio/deck, community laundry, surfboard racks, and resident manager.' The consistency between MLS checkboxes and detailed remarks across different agents strongly supports that the building offers a patio/deck area.

Remarks emphasize proximity to beaches, parks, and city life but do not identify a dedicated jogging or walking path as part of the building. This suggests the building does not offer its own jogging path.

Across detailed amenity lists, there is no reference to any kids’ play area or playground. The consistent omission and MLS data indicate there is no playground.

Across all remarks, outdoor space is described only as lanais and a pool, with no reference to yards or enclosed ground-level outdoor areas. Combined with 0/11 MLS entries for private yard, this strongly indicates the building does not offer private yard space as an amenity.

Agents do not advertise any golf-related amenities, focusing instead on the pool and urban location. This, combined with the lack of MLS checkmarks, shows there is no putting green.

Listings emphasize a saltwater pool, patio/deck, and lounge areas but do not describe a broader recreation or amenity area. Given the lack of explicit mention and no MLS checkmarks, a formal recreation area is unlikely.

Amenity descriptions focus on the saltwater pool, patio/deck, lounge areas, and on-site restaurant, without any reference to a dedicated recreation or game room. The consistent MLS omission supports that a recreation room is not present.

Strong, consistent evidence that the building has an on-site restaurant: numerous listing remarks (10+ occurrences across the provided remarks) explicitly reference Hy's Steak House (phrases include 'Famous Hy’s Steak House on site,' 'Hy’s Steakhouse right at your doorstep,' and 'home to the famous Hy's Steakhouse'). This is corroborated by historical high-confidence MLS data and appears across multiple agents' remarks rather than being a single copy-paste error.

Amenity descriptions are focused on the pool area, patio/deck, and units’ private lanais, with no indication of a shared rooftop space. This absence across many listings suggests there is no rooftop amenity.

Agents highlight the pool, laundry, security, surfboard storage, and on-site restaurant but never a sauna or steam facility. The lack of any mention across many listings makes it very likely that no sauna is present.

At least two listings describe dedicated surfboard storage facilities, including a 'surfboard storage locker' and 'surfboard racks.' These are building-level locker amenities available to residents, so the building should be treated as offering storage units/lockers even though agents are not checking the storage box in the MLS.

Multiple listings explicitly reference dedicated surfboard storage (secured racks/lockers). The consistent, explicit language yields high confidence that surfboard storage is available.

Agents describe location, pool, laundry, security, and on-site restaurant but never mention tennis facilities. Combined with the absence of the MLS tennis-court amenity, this strongly indicates there is no tennis court.

Implied evidence for a building trash chute: most recent MLS listings list the trash chute amenity (12/14), however none of the provided public remarks explicitly state 'trash chute' or 'garbage chute' — only a single remark notes trash is included in HOA fees. Given strong checkbox prevalence but lack of explicit remark language, the feature is included with moderate confidence (0.78) as likely present.

Parking is consistently described as deeded or rentable covered stalls and guest parking managed by security, with no mention of valet services. The absence of any 'valet' references in both checkboxes and remarks across many listings supports that there is no valet amenity at this building.

Listings emphasize the building’s central Waikiki location and access to surrounding streets and shops without referencing gates or perimeter fencing. With no MLS indication of gated or walled grounds, it is very unlikely that the property has a enclosing wall or fence as a marketed feature.

Amenity lists refer only to a saltwater pool, with no suggestion of an accompanying spa or whirlpool. This consistent pattern and MLS data indicate there is no whirlpool/hot tub facility.

Strong evidence the building has a shared pool: historical MLS data flagged POOL on all 14 listings, and many current public remarks explicitly mention the amenity (quotes include 'sparkling swimming pool', 'heated saltwater pool', and 'saltwater pool'). Multiple agents reference the pool consistently across listings rather than a single isolated mention, supporting a high-confidence inclusion.

At least one listing clearly describes the building amenity as a 'heated saltwater pool', while several others refer to the same saltwater pool without specifying temperature. Because amenities are shared building-wide and no listing suggests a separate unheated pool, the evidence supports that the building’s pool is heated. The single explicit 'heated' remark is detailed and consistent with the broader amenity descriptions.

Several listings explicitly call the building's pool saltwater (some mention it is heated as well). The repeated, specific language across listings provides high confidence that the pool is salt water.

Multiple current listings explicitly mention in-unit laundry — e.g., 'washer and dryer in unit' and 'Washer/Dryer is in the unit' appear in at least 3 different unit remarks. This confirms prior high-confidence MLS data indicating some units (notably 3-bedroom corner units) include in-unit washers and dryers; evidence is consistent across multiple listings rather than only a single ad.

Multiple recent listings describe building amenities that include 'community laundry,' e.g., 'Building amenities include sparkling pool, community laundry, community lounge areas' and 'Amenities include, saltwater pool, and community laundry.' At least four distinct agent remarks explicitly mention shared/community laundry, and 10/13 current MLS entries have the community-laundry amenity checked. This strongly confirms that the building offers shared laundry facilities in addition to some units having in‑unit washers/dryers.

Multiple listings reference community laundry but there is no language indicating payment is required. I searched for terms like 'coin laundry', 'card operated', 'paid laundry', and 'quarters' and found nothing in the remarks.

Listings repeatedly note there is community laundry in the building, but none state that laundry facilities are available on every floor. I searched for phrases such as 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and 'floor-by-floor laundry' and found no matches.

Multiple listings confirm that the building offers parking, including deeded and assigned covered stalls (e.g., "1 assigned covered parking," "deeded and covered parking spot," "includes a separately deeded covered parking stall"). Several remarks also note rentable and guest parking ("Parking rental available through building management," "Monthly parking rental ($150/mo) is available," "Guest parking from 8:00am to 4:30pm"). While some units have no deeded stall (reflected as NONE in MLS), the consistent remarks across many agents show the building clearly provides parking options.

Multiple listings explicitly state assigned or deeded parking: phrases include 'assigned parking stall', 'deeded and covered parking spot', and 'separately deeded covered parking stall'. These references appear across several agent remarks (at least 6 distinct mentions across the provided remarks), matching prior MLS checkbox history, indicating strong and consistent evidence that assigned parking is offered.

Multiple listings advertise covered stalls, including 'one covered parking stall', '1 assigned covered parking', and 'separately deeded covered parking stall'. With 6/12 current MLS entries also indicating covered or garage parking, there is strong evidence that the building provides covered parking options for some units and rentals.

Several listings explicitly mention deeded/ separately deeded covered parking stalls and that 'not all condos in the building are deeded with parking.' This clearly indicates that some units include deeded parking.

Across 11 listings with detailed amenity descriptions, there is no reference to EV or electric vehicle charging, and the EVCHRG field is never selected in MLS data. This consistent absence makes it highly likely that the building does not provide EV charging stations at this time.

Public remarks show parking may incur a monthly rental fee and specific examples range from about $150 to $193 per month. Fees vary by listing/stall and some units instead have deeded parking (no monthly fee).

Guest parking is explicitly referenced in the public remarks: 'Residents enjoy... guest parking' and 'Guest parking from 8:00am to 4:30pm see security to register.' These clear, agent-written statements indicate the building provides guest/visitor parking (with registration/hours), so include the feature.

Listings emphasize building security (24-hour security, keyed elevator, extra secure building) but never mention a gated or card-controlled garage, and SECENT is unchecked for all units. This pattern indicates that while the building is secure, the parking itself is not described as having a distinct secured entry system.

Neither MLS data nor remarks reference tandem stalls, despite multiple detailed descriptions of parking arrangements (assigned, deeded, covered, rental, guest). The lack of any mention supports the conclusion that tandem parking is not a feature of this building.

Across all listings, there is no mention of valet or attended parking, and the VALET field is never selected in MLS data. Given how consistently amenities are otherwise marketed, this strongly suggests the building does not provide valet parking.

Listings explicitly reference a long wait list for parking and that parking rentals are available through building management, indicating a formal waitlist system is in place.

A public remark specifically notes that the building 'has 24 hour security, keyed elevator,' which directly matches the keyed elevator feature definition. Even though the generic elevator amenity is not checked in MLS, the explicit remark provides strong evidence this secure elevator access exists.

Listings emphasize strong security and a keyed elevator, but none explicitly state card/fob access or electronic keycard entry. I searched for 'key card', 'fob', 'card reader', and related terms with no matches.

Multiple recent listings explicitly describe the building as having '24 hr. security' or '24hour security', and one notes guest parking registration with 'security', confirming on-site security staff. Another listing lists 'security' in the amenity list alongside an onsite manager, reinforcing that this is active building security rather than just locked doors. Combined with 12/13 current MLS entries checking SECGUA and strong historical evidence, this firmly supports that the building has 24-hour security guards.

Listings explicitly describe 24-hour security and procedures involving security staff (e.g., registering guest parking), which supports that the building has a security patrol or staffed security presence.

Across all provided listings, there are no references to cameras or video surveillance, only to guards and general 'security'. With SECSYS absent from every MLS record, it appears the building does not advertise a dedicated video security system.

Central A/C is well-supported: at least a majority of the current listings and inclusions list ACCEN/CENAC (8/14 unit_features; 14/14 inclusions) and many remarks explicitly state 'central A/C' or 'central air' (e.g., 'central A/C', 'Central Air-Conditioning', 'central AC'). Evidence is consistent across multiple listings/agents and aligns with prior high confidence, indicating the building offers central air conditioning.

Across all provided listings, air conditioning is only described as 'central A/C' or via central-coil upgrades, with no references to ductless, split, or mini-split systems and no split AC boxes checked in the MLS. Given the building’s central system and utility-included HOA structure, it is very unlikely that split AC is a building feature.

Numerous listings emphasize central A/C and recent central A/C coil or system upgrades, and none mention window, wall, or room air conditioners. MLS data likewise shows no window AC inclusions, so window units are very unlikely to be a feature of this building.

All 14 current MLS listings (14/14) list construction_materials = 'CONCRE', and prior data had high confidence that Waikiki Park Heights is concrete. Public remarks do not explicitly state 'concrete', but the consistent, building-wide MLS checkbox across multiple listings/agents provides strong evidence the building is constructed of concrete.

Across both historical and current data, double-wall construction appears in only a small minority of MLS checkboxes (1/11 previously, 2/12 currently) and is never described in the remarks. Given the strong, consistent evidence for concrete high-rise construction, double-wall is likely an agent input mistake rather than a true building feature.

Hollow tile construction is never checked in MLS (0 of 11) and never mentioned in remarks. This provides strong negative evidence that the building is not characterized as hollow-tile construction.

None of the 11 MLS listings use the masonry/stucco construction checkbox. With consistent selection of concrete and no supporting remarks, it is unlikely the building is classified as masonry-stucco construction.

None of the 11 MLS listings check the steel-frame box, while all agree on concrete. With no remarks mentioning steel framing, the best-supported interpretation is that the building is not classified as steel-frame construction in MLS.

The SLAB construction option is never checked in the available MLS data (0 of 11), and listing remarks are silent about slab foundations. In the absence of any explicit MLS or remarks support, the building is not classified as 'slab' in this dataset.

No analysis available

Zero of 11 recent MLS listings mark wood frame, and all instead mark concrete. Combined with the obvious high-rise condo form in Waikiki, this strongly indicates the building is not wood-frame construction.

The above-ground construction box is checked in a minority (3 of 11) of MLS listings and is not corroborated by any remarks. Given the inconsistency for a building-level trait, it is more likely an MLS data quirk than a reliable feature.

No recent listings indicate brick construction in the MLS data. The building presents and is described as a typical Waikiki high-rise condo, making brick construction highly unlikely.

Single-wall construction, common in older low-rise Hawaii homes, is not indicated in any of the 11 MLS records and would be incompatible with a high-rise tower of this type. This makes single-wall construction virtually impossible here.

Multiple listings clearly indicate a 30-day minimum rental requirement, which prevents short-term/vacation rentals. Therefore short-term rentals are not allowed per the public remarks.

There is no indication of any hotel or branded rental pool in the remarks, and because short-term rentals are explicitly restricted by a 30-day minimum, hotel pool participation is not applicable.

Listings contain no references to mandatory participation in any rental or hotel pool. Given the absence of a hotel pool and the 30-day minimum rental restriction, mandatory pool participation does not apply.

The available remarks and MLS fields do not clearly indicate any fee simple units (no 'fee simple' or 'FS' mentions in 11 listings). Building-level presence of fee simple units remains unknown based on current data.

No listings mention leasehold terms or lease expiration, and the MLS tenure coding does not clearly show LH for any unit. As a result, it is not possible to determine from current data whether the building has leasehold units.

Searched remarks for 'lease expires', 'land lease', 'ground lease', and explicit years; found no leasehold language or expiry year. Returning null because no specific year was provided in public remarks.

Searched public remarks for phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', or 'VA loans accepted' and found no references. With no evidence in the remarks, VA approval is assumed not stated in listings.

Remarks explicitly state the building is fully insured (quote: "Waikiki Park Heights is 100% insured!"), which matches the definition of walls-in/full HOA insurance. This is strong, direct evidence, so the value is true with high confidence.

In 11 listings, the fire-sprinkler amenity is consistently left unchecked and no remarks mention sprinklers despite detailed amenity descriptions. This strongly suggests the building lacks a common fire sprinkler system.

Searched the public remarks for phrases like 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE passed', 'passed fire inspection', and related terms. There were no mentions, so there is no evidence the building has an FLSE pass; per rules, absence of mention results in a medium-confidence false.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Strong evidence that the building offers ocean views: numerous listings reference ocean outlooks (examples: 'Gorgeous Ocen View!', 'ocean views from lanai', 'overlooking the azure shimmering ocean'). At least several units/ads in these remarks promote ocean-facing lanais or ocean/mountain/city panoramas, and multiple agents consistently market ocean views across listings.

There is clear evidence that some units offer mountain views: at least a few listings explicitly state 'ocean/mountain/city views' and 'mountain views from bedroom.' While not every unit advertises this, multiple agents describe combined ocean and mountain outlooks for certain units.

A renovated end unit is described as having 'even Diamond Head views from side windows,' indicating at least some stack/orientation in the building sees Diamond Head. This is reinforced by 2 of 11 MLS entries checking DIAMOND HEAD as a view option.

Evidence that the building offers city views: several remarks reference 'city' or 'city life' and at least one listing explicitly lists 'ocean/mountain/city views.' Although fewer listings mention city views than ocean views, multiple agents note an urban/skyline aspect to certain units.

Listings describe 'ocean views' and 'views of Waikiki Beach’s famous surf areas' but never explicitly mention coastal or coastline panoramas. Given this and just one MLS record tagging COASTLINE, the evidence does not clearly support coastline views as a separate, notable attribute.

The building is described in terms of ocean, mountain, city, and Diamond Head views, with amenities like a pool and lounge areas but no garden-view language. With 0 of 11 MLS entries tagging GARDEN, garden views do not appear to be a notable feature here.

While none of the narrative remarks call out golf course or fairway views, 2 of 11 MLS entries checked GOLF COURSE as a view. This suggests that at least some units, likely on certain orientations or floors, may see the nearby golf course, though the evidence is based solely on MLS checkboxes.

Across all provided remarks, views are described as ocean, mountain, city, and Diamond Head, but never as marina, harbor, or canal. With 0 of 11 MLS entries checking MARINA/HARBOR, there is strong evidence that marina views are not a characteristic of this building.

No direct evidence of sunrise views in the remarks: agents repeatedly advertise ocean, mountain, city, and Diamond Head exposures but do not describe 'sunrise' or 'eastern exposure.' Given the lack of explicit sunrise language across multiple listings and only a single MLS checkbox flagged, it's unlikely the building is known for sunrise views.

Even the strongest view-focused listings do not mention sunset or evening views, instead emphasizing daytime ocean/mountain/city aspects and surf-checking from the lanai. With just a single sunset checkbox in the MLS and no narrative confirmation, there is not enough evidence to treat sunset views as a building-level feature. The building is therefore considered not to have specifically marketed sunset views.

None of the marketing language or MLS data suggests that any units overlook a cemetery. With zero MLS tags and no narrative mentions, cemetery views can be confidently ruled out for this building.

Listings describe ocean, mountain, Diamond Head and surf views but do not state the building or units have views of Friday night fireworks. I searched for 'fireworks', 'watch fireworks', and similar phrases with no results.

No analysis available

The building rules are clearly described in at least one listing as 'no pets allowed,' with no other agent suggesting pets are permitted. This explicit policy language, repeated without contradiction, indicates pets are not allowed in the building.

Multiple listings for this building explicitly mention on-site management: phrases include 'on-site management', 'on-site manager', 'onsite building manager', 'site manager', and 'resident manager'. At least 6 separate public-remark entries reference an on-site/resident manager, matching prior MLS checkbox data (7/14). Evidence is consistent across different listings and agents, supporting inclusion of a resident manager feature.

Listings market the property as condos suitable for second homes or investment with a '30 day minimum rental policy,' but never use terms like 'condotel' or describe hotel management or a front desk. This consistent framing supports that the building is not operated as a condotel.

The building is consistently described as a condominium with deeded parking and standard condo association fees, not as a cooperative. The lack of any 'co-op' or 'cooperative' terminology in both MLS data and remarks across all listings indicates it is not a co-op.