Waikiki Marina Condominium
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Waikiki Marina Condominium
Building Overview
Waikiki Marina Condominium in Waikiki—39-story concrete/steel building (1984) with ocean and mountain views and on-site pool and BBQ area.
About Waikiki Marina Condominium
Waikiki Marina Condominium is a 39-floor residential building located in the Hobron-Ena district of Waikiki. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1984, contains 136 units, and is built with concrete and a steel frame. The property is served by two elevators.
Key on-site amenities include a pool, BBQ area, and on-site management and security staff (resident manager and security guard). Units feature central and window air conditioning options. The building offers ocean, mountain, and sunset views to residents.
Additional practical details: covered, assigned parking is available. Pets are not allowed, and short-term rentals are permitted. The management company is Hawaiiana Management Company, Ltd. Based on MLS data; buyers should verify all information with the listing agent or management company prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for an explicit owner-occupancy percentage or descriptive language about the resident mix, but found nothing. Since the current value exists and there is no remark evidence to override it, I kept 9.0. The current figure is notably low for a 39-story building, but the remarks do not provide any alternative number.
I searched the remarks for explicit elevator counts such as "2 elevators," "4 elevators," or "multiple elevators," but found no stated number. Since the current value exists and nothing in the remarks contradicts it, I kept 2 with low confidence. The mention of an elevator modernization project supports that the building has elevators, but not how many.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV inclusion is very well supported across the building. About 19 of 20 current listings include CABTV, and multiple remarks explicitly mention 'Cable TV' or 'basic cable' in the maintenance fee. This looks consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
Evidence for common-area electricity is moderate rather than explicit. Roughly 10 of 20 current listings carry OTCOEX, and a number of remarks describe the fees as 'all-inclusive' or covering utilities broadly, but few spell out common-area electricity directly. This supports inclusion with medium confidence.
No analysis available
Electricity inclusion is essentially universal in the current MLS data. All 20 current listings include ELECTR, and multiple remarks explicitly state 'includes electricity' or 'all utilities included.' This is strong, consistent building-level evidence.
No remarks mention gas being included in maintenance fees, even in detailed lists of included utilities that specifically enumerate electricity, water, sewer, cable, internet, and hot water but omit gas; only 2/20 MLS entries check GAS, suggesting likely copy/paste or agent error rather than a true building-wide benefit.
Hot water appears to be included in the maintenance fee for this building. The current MLS data shows 19 of 20 listings with HOTWAT and no listings with WTRHTR, and several remarks explicitly mention 'Hot Water' as included. This is high-confidence building-level evidence.
Internet inclusion is supported by both the MLS checkboxes and remarks. Fourteen of 20 current listings include INTSER, and multiple descriptions say 'internet' or 'basic internet' is included. This suggests a real building amenity rather than a random agent error.
No analysis available
Sewer is consistently included across the building. Seventeen of 20 current listings show SEWER, and several remarks explicitly list sewer among included utilities. The evidence is strong and repeated across listings.
Water inclusion is fully supported by the current MLS data. All 20 listings include WATER, and multiple remarks explicitly confirm water is part of the maintenance fee. This is the strongest possible building-level evidence.
BBQ is strongly supported by the current remarks and the historical MLS data. Dozens of listings mention it directly, including 'outdoor dining area with BBQ,' 'BBQ area,' and 'BBQ' in the amenity list, suggesting this is a consistent building-level feature rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for surfboard-storage-related amenities and found no evidence of them. The remarks mention general storage in units, but nothing about dedicated surfboard storage facilities.
Tennis court access is strongly confirmed by the current remarks and the historical MLS data. Many listings explicitly mention a 'tennis court' or 'game of tennis,' and the repeated amenity package references across listings indicate this is a shared building amenity, not an isolated unit feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across listings: approximately 16 of 20 current listings explicitly mention 'whirlpool', 'jacuzzi', or 'hot tub' (quotes: 'whirlpool', 'jacuzzi', 'relaxing hot tub'). The repeated references across many agent remarks corroborate the historical high-confidence record that the building provides a shared whirlpool/spa.
Pool is strongly confirmed for this building. Many current listings explicitly mention it, including phrases such as "pool," "swimming pool," and "resort-like amenities," often alongside jacuzzi/BBQ/tennis court references. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and reads like a genuine shared building amenity rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
I searched for terms like saltwater pool, salt pool, and saline pool. The remarks confirm a pool exists, but they do not identify it as salt water.
At least some units in the building have in-unit laundry: I found explicit phrases in the remarks such as "in-unit washer and dryer—an uncommon upgrade," "all new appliances including a washer and dryer," and "Includes washer/dryer in the unit," (3 listings). The MLS checkbox data shows 2/20 listings include WASHER/DRYER. Many other listings reference community/coin laundry, suggesting in-unit laundry is present in some units but not widespread; evidence is credible but limited across agents, so confidence is moderate.
Shared/community laundry is clearly present in the building. It is explicitly mentioned in many current remarks, including "community laundry," "coin laundry facilities," and "laundromat has been UPDATED," which strongly confirms the amenity beyond checkbox data. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and appears to be a real building feature, not just copy-paste MLS noise.
The remarks directly support paid community laundry. Coin laundry is explicit evidence of a pay-per-use laundry setup, likely coin- or card-operated.
I searched for explicit wording such as laundry on each floor, laundry room on every floor, or floor-by-floor laundry. The remarks only mention community laundry/laundromat generally, which does not establish that every floor has its own facility.
Many units advertise included parking such as 'assigned parking', 'one covered parking stall', 'one assigned and gated parking space', 'standard-size assigned parking stall in a secure and covered parking garage', and MLS parking_features show various parking types with no 'NONE' entries.
Assigned parking is strongly supported across the building. Multiple current listings explicitly mention "one assigned parking stall," "1 assigned parking," and "assigned and covered parking," which matches the high-confidence MLS history showing 18/20 listings with ASSIGN. This looks consistent across many agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
Covered parking is very strongly supported. Current remarks mention covered parking in many listings, including "one covered parking stall included," "covered parking stall," and "secure and covered parking garage," aligning with the high-confidence MLS pattern of 15/20 listings. The evidence is broad and repetitive across multiple agents.
I searched for deeded/owned parking language such as "deeded parking," "parking included in deed," or "owned stall" and found no matches. The remarks consistently suggest included assigned parking rather than deeded parking.
No analysis available
I looked for any explicit parking fee, monthly parking cost, or separate parking rental language and found none. The listings instead say the parking stall is included, so there is no evidence of an added monthly parking fee.
No public remarks among the multiple listings reviewed mention 'guest parking' or 'visitor parking', despite ~5/20 MLS checkbox checks for GUEST. Many listings explicitly describe assigned and covered stalls but none describe guest/visitor spaces; this consistent absence across agents suggests guest parking is not an offered/advertised feature.
Secured-entry parking is supported by both MLS history and multiple public remarks. Several listings explicitly say "secured entry," "secured parking," "gated parking space," and "assigned covered secured parking," which is strong confirmation that the building offers controlled-access parking. While fewer listings mention it than assigned or covered parking, the repeated language is consistent enough to include it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for references to a parking waitlist or parking queue and found nothing. The remarks imply parking is available with the unit rather than managed through a waitlist.
No analysis available
I looked for card/fob access language such as key card access, electronic entry, or keycard entry. The remarks mention secured entry and gated parking, but nothing specifically indicates a card-based access system.
Multiple recent listings (roughly 5–6) reference security features, including explicit “night security,” “secured entry,” and secure/covered parking, suggesting organized on-site security rather than minimal access control. With 7/20 current MLS entries checking SECGUA and consistent security-related language across different agents, there is strong, building-wide evidence that the Waikiki Marina provides security guard or equivalent staffed security service.
I searched for patrol-specific wording and found only general security references like secured entry, night security, security cameras, and resident manager. None of the remarks establish an actual patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence supports window AC. Current MLS data shows 20/20 listings include ACWIUN, and historical data was also nearly unanimous at 39/40 listings, indicating this is a consistent building feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly. Remarks rarely mention AC directly, but the overall MLS evidence is overwhelming and stable.
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS data, with 20 of 20 current listings marked CONCRE. None of the public remarks dispute this, and the consistency suggests this is a reliable building-level feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
Double wall construction appears in 6 of 20 current listings, so there is at least some MLS support, but the feature is not discussed in any of the public remarks. The evidence looks more like partial listing checkbox data than a fully confirmed, consistently described building characteristic.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks strongly support that short-term rentals are allowed in this building. I found repeated explicit references to NUCs and legal short-term rental use, including nightly/daily/weekly rental language.
I searched for hotel-pool language such as hotel rental pool, hotel-managed rentals, or brand-specific pool participation and found none. Since STR is allowed but no hotel pool is referenced, this remains false.
I looked for wording like mandatory participation, must rent, or cannot opt out and found nothing. The listings instead imply flexibility for owners, so there is no evidence of a mandatory pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any ground-lease or leasehold expiration language such as "lease expires [year]," "ground lease ends," or "renewed through" and found nothing. Because the remarks indicate fee-simple ownership, a lease expiry year is not applicable here.
I searched for explicit VA approval language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," or "VA loans accepted" and found none. The only financing-related remark was conventional loan financing, which does not indicate VA eligibility.
I looked for insurance-related wording that would indicate full HOA coverage or walls-in insurance, but the remarks do not mention it. Because there is no current confirmed value and no explicit remark evidence, this feature cannot be verified from the listings. The value is set to false based on lack of mention only.
At least one listing explicitly notes that the maintenance fee includes a 'sprinkler system,' strongly implying building fire sprinklers. Additionally, 8 of 20 MLS entries check the fire-sprinkler amenity, suggesting some agents are aware of this feature even if most remarks do not repeat it. There is no evidence in any remarks that the building lacks sprinklers.
I searched the public remarks for any fire/life safety evaluation language, including FLSE passed, fire safety certified, or similar compliance wording, and found none. With no current verified value and no remark evidence, this remains unsupported. I am treating it as false only by absence of mention in the remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are strongly supported across many listings, with well over a dozen remarks explicitly advertising ocean or ocean/marina views. Phrases like 'panoramic ocean views,' 'sweeping ocean views,' and 'stunning ocean views' appear repeatedly, suggesting consistent building-level view inventory rather than a one-off unit feature.
Multiple listings mention mountain or mauka/mountain-range views (examples: "Waianae Mountain range", "ocean, mountains, harbor", "ocean, city, and mountain views"). The repeated, explicit language across listings supports that some units offer mountain views.
Limited but explicit evidence: a penthouse listing explicitly references Diamond Head views ("PICTURE YOURSELF LOOKING AT DIAMOND HEAD"). This appears in a smaller subset of listings, suggesting Diamond Head views exist for some units (likely higher floors/penthouse), though it is not broadly advertised across all listings.
City views are confirmed by multiple listings, though less frequently than ocean views. The remarks include direct references to 'city' views and one description notes the building’s 'urban city vibe,' reinforcing that some units offer city-facing outlooks.
Multiple listings explicitly reference the coastline (quotes include "span the coastline of Waikiki" and "perfectly frame the sparkling turquoise coastline"), showing that some units offer clear coastline/shoreline views. The language appears in several agent remarks, indicating building-level availability.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Marina views are well supported by multiple listings and appear to be a recurring selling point for the building. Remarks explicitly reference 'marina' and 'harbor' views many times, including 'ocean, marina, sunsets' and 'Ala Wai Boat Harbor' views, indicating this is not just agent copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence that some units have sunset views. Across the remarks, many listings explicitly mention sunset-related language, including "exceptional sweeping ocean and sunset views," "watching the sunset," and "ocean, sunset and firework views." This appears consistent across multiple agents rather than copy-paste noise, so the sunset view feature should remain true.
No analysis available
Multiple listings confirm fireworks are visible from units in the building. The wording clearly describes fireworks as a view from home, not just proximity to fireworks events.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is strongly supported by both historical MLS data and current public remarks. Multiple listings explicitly mention 'a general manager,' 'on-site management for added security,' and 'Res mgr,' indicating this is not just a checkbox artifact. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and aligns with the prior high-confidence RESMAN status.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.