Waikiki Landmark

MLS property data overwhelmingly lists 1992 as the year built (36 of 37 listings), with one outlier at 1999. In the absence of any remarks contradicting this, 1992 is taken as the construction year.

Remarks state the building 'features two, 38-story towers bridged together at the penthouse levels,' which directly establishes a 38-floor height. Other listings referencing high floors and penthouses align with this count, with no conflicting floor totals mentioned.

A listing explicitly notes the building as 'only 196 residential units,' implying this is the total unit count for the project. No other remarks or data contradict this figure, so it is adopted as the building's unit_total.

I searched for phrases and percentages indicating owner occupancy, such as "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied," but found none. The current value of 52% is therefore retained with low confidence because the remarks do not confirm or deny it.

I looked for an explicit elevator count such as "4 elevators," "six elevators," or similar wording, but none was stated in the remarks. The building context lists 6 elevators, and nothing in the public remarks contradicts that, so the current value is retained with low confidence.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Central A/C is repeatedly confirmed across many listings, not just one agent. Several remarks explicitly say "central AC" or describe multiple A/C units, which is strong building-level evidence that this feature is included/available.

Cable inclusion is supported by at least one clear remark and by prior MLS pattern. The strongest wording is the explicit note that the fee is for "basic TV cable," which aligns with the building-level utility pattern despite some MLS inconsistency.

There is no direct public-remarks evidence for common-area electricity being included. Although one listing says maintenance fees include "electricity," that is not specific enough to confirm common-area power, and the current MLS pattern alone is not enough to override the lack of direct support.

Remarks repeatedly reference fee-simple ownership and condo-style amenities, never co-op terminology or co-op tax obligations. The complete absence of COOTAX in the MLS confirms that cooperative taxes are not part of the maintenance fees.

A detailed, non-boilerplate remark specifically lists electricity as included in the maintenance fees along with water, trash, and sewer. Even though MLS checkboxes do not consistently reflect this, the explicit narrative description provides strong evidence that electricity is included building-wide.

The building appears to be an all-electric high-rise, with no gas ranges or gas infrastructure mentioned in any listing. With no MLS records indicating gas in the HOA, it is very likely that gas is not provided or included in the maintenance fees.

Public remarks do not clearly mention hot water being included in the maintenance fee. Despite strong MLS history (16/20 with HOTWAT), the remarks are silent or point toward unit-level water-heating/appliance setups, so the safest read is that hot water is not clearly verifiable from the remarks alone.

Internet inclusion is not supported by the public remarks. With only a modest historical MLS pattern and no explicit mention of internet or Wi‑Fi in the listing descriptions, this feature appears to be an unconfirmed MLS checkbox rather than a verified building benefit.

Across all remarks, there is no mention of marina facilities, boat slips, or marina-related amenities. Combined with the complete absence of MARINA in the MLS data, this indicates marina fees or access are not part of the association dues.

Sewer inclusion is very strongly supported. Multiple remarks explicitly mention "sewer" as part of the maintenance fees, and the MLS record is overwhelmingly consistent, making this a high-confidence building feature.

Water inclusion is overwhelmingly supported. Public remarks directly say maintenance fees include "water," and the MLS history is unanimous, so this is a very high-confidence building-level utility.

BBQ/grilling facilities are clearly a shared building amenity at Waikiki Landmark. The remarks mention BBQ features in many forms across numerous listings, including 'BBQ areas,' 'BBQ pavilions,' 'gas BBQs,' and 'barbecue grills,' indicating broad, repeated support.

0/20 listings reference any form of bicycle storage, and the amenity descriptions consistently omit bike rooms or racks while highlighting many other facilities. Given the breadth of detail agents provide for this luxury building, the absence of any bike-storage mention strongly indicates that dedicated bike storage is not available.

The building overlooks the canal but is not marketed with dock or marina access. The consistent absence of any 'boat dock' or 'marina' language suggests there is no boat docking amenity for residents.

Car wash facilities appear to be a real building amenity at Waikiki Landmark. Multiple listings mention 'car wash in the garage' or simply 'car wash,' providing repeated confirmation across separate remarks.

I did not find convincing evidence of a true clubhouse amenity in the remarks. The building is repeatedly described with pools, gym, lounge, meeting room, and community/recreation spaces, but not a dedicated clubhouse, so this appears unsupported.

Concierge service is explicitly mentioned in numerous remarks, despite being checked in only 5 of 20 MLS records. Key phrases include 'concierge services with multilingual staff,' 'multi-lingual concierge,' 'dedicated concierge,' and 'Residential Specialist' at the lobby/front entry, which together indicate staffed front-desk style service. The evidence is strong and appears across multiple listings rather than a single copied description.

Listings frequently note that the building is pet-friendly but never reference a dedicated dog park or run. Given the lack of textual evidence and almost no MLS support, the building likely does not offer a formal dog park.

There is solid evidence of a staffed lobby/attendant presence at Waikiki Landmark. One remark explicitly says the building has a 'doorman,' while many others describe concierge services, a Residential Specialist at the lobby entrance, and General Manager/on-site staff, which together strongly support a doorman/lobby attendant feature. The evidence appears consistent across multiple listings and agents, not just one isolated mention.

Exercise facilities are strongly supported for Waikiki Landmark. Multiple listings explicitly reference a 'fitness center,' 'gym,' 'exercise gym,' and a 'state of the art fitness center,' showing consistent evidence across many agents rather than a one-off mention.

The building offers concierge and 24-hour security, but there is no indication of any limousine, town car, or similar transportation service. The silence on this specific luxury feature suggests it is not available.

Meeting room availability is well supported by the public remarks. Several listings explicitly cite a 'meeting room,' 'conference room,' or 'community room,' which appears in multiple independent descriptions and is not just copy-paste noise.

Strong building-level evidence supports patio/deck amenities. Across the remarks, well over a dozen listings mention outdoor space such as "private lanai," "covered lanai," "private balcony," "broad lanai," and "huge lanai," plus shared amenity areas like a "pool deck" and "outdoor recreation deck." The consistency across multiple listings and agents suggests this is a real building feature, not just copy-paste error.

The building is near outdoor areas where residents can walk or jog, but no remarks indicate a dedicated jogging or fitness path as part of the property. The lack of any such mention strongly suggests this amenity does not exist.

Amenities like a kids pool are mentioned but no outdoor play structure or playground is described. The consistent omission plus zero MLS checkmarks indicate there is no children's playground amenity.

No analysis available

Extensive amenity descriptions cover pools, gym, BBQ, lounges, and meeting rooms, but never any putting green. This makes it very likely that a putting green is not part of the building amenities.

Moderately strong evidence: while MLS checkbox shows 6/20, numerous remarks highlight an 'expansive rec deck' or 'outdoor recreation deck' with pools, cabanas, kitchenette and entertainment areas (phrases include 'expansive Rec Deck', 'outdoor recreation deck', 'recreation area'). Several agents independently reference the shared recreation deck, so confidence is solid.

The building has solid evidence of recreation-style shared spaces, though the wording varies by listing. Multiple remarks describe a 'Rec Deck,' 'recreation deck,' 'recreation area,' 'lounge with kitchenette,' and 'community room,' which functionally match a recreation room amenity. This is supported by several listings and appears to be a genuine common-area feature.

Remarks emphasize nearby 'gourmet dining' and 'gourmet level restaurants' but clearly position them as neighborhood amenities, not part of the building. With no explicit reference to an in-building restaurant, this amenity should be considered absent.

The phrase 'deluxe rooftop pool with panoramic ocean and city views' directly indicates rooftop-level amenities. While MLS checkboxes omit ROOFDCK, detailed remarks from at least one agent plus descriptions of elevated pool decks support treating rooftop access/amenities as present.

Agents frequently describe pools, jacuzzies, spas, and gyms, but never a sauna or steam room. Given how often amenities are itemized, this omission strongly indicates that a sauna is not part of the building's offerings.

0/20 recent listings advertise building storage units or lockers, and none check storage-related amenities in the MLS. Remarks repeatedly list extensive amenities (pools, cabanas, gym, meeting room, car wash, concierge, etc.) but never mention common-area storage, suggesting such facilities are not provided or are not a marketed feature.

The public remarks list many amenities (multiple pools, gym, BBQ areas, cabanas, car wash, meeting rooms, security, etc.) but never mention any type of surfboard or board storage. I specifically searched for phrases like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', and 'bike and surfboard storage' and found none, so it is likely this building does not offer dedicated surfboard storage.

Tennis court access is weakly evidenced in the current remarks, but the historical MLS data still shows it in a small number of listings. There are no explicit current mentions of a tennis court or tennis facilities, so this looks more like sparse MLS support than a fully confirmed amenity. I would keep it tentatively, but with much lower confidence than the other shared amenities.

Trash chute appears to be a shared building feature based on the MLS amenity data, with 17 of 20 listings checked. Unlike BBQ and whirlpool, the public remarks do not explicitly describe it, so the evidence comes from the repeated MLS confirmations rather than remark language.

No analysis available

The remarks focus on the grand lobby, recreation deck, pools, and location at the 'gateway to Waikiki' but never describe the property as gated, fenced, or walled. With just a single MLS instance of a gated/wall/fence amenity against 19 without it and no textual support, the best interpretation is that the building does not have a defined perimeter wall/fence or gated-community setup. The feature is therefore treated as absent.

Whirlpool/spa amenities are clearly present in the building. Remarks mention 'Jacuzzi,' 'hot tubs,' 'whirlpools,' and 'spa' across many listings, showing consistent support for this amenity.

Pool evidence is extremely strong across the listings and appears in many agent remarks, not just MLS checkbox data. Multiple listings explicitly describe "three resort-style pools," "multiple swimming pools," "3 pools," and a "large pool/pool deck," which strongly supports a shared building amenity.

Heated pool evidence is strong and comes from multiple independent remarks rather than a single copied phrase. Listings explicitly reference "3 heated pools," "heated pool," and "largest heated private pool," so the heated designation should be retained despite the current MLS checkbox inconsistency.

All provided public remarks were searched for any indication that the swimming pools are salt water (terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater', 'saline', or 'salt pool'). None of the many detailed descriptions of the amenity deck and multiple pools referenced salt water systems, so the pool is assumed not to be salt water based on available remarks. This could be updated if future listings explicitly describe the pool as salt water.

In-unit laundry is strongly supported for Waikiki Landmark. Current public remarks explicitly mention it in multiple listings, including phrases like "stacked Miele washer & ventless dryer," "built in washer and dryer," and "washer/dryer." This aligns with the historical MLS pattern of 20/20 listings including washer/dryer, so the evidence is consistent and not just a one-off agent copy.

Across all provided remarks, there are no mentions of community or shared laundry rooms, coin laundry, or laundry facilities on any floor, despite detailed descriptions of amenities. Instead, multiple listings focus on in-unit washer/dryers, making it unlikely that a separate community laundry is a notable building feature. The lone MLS COMLAU entry is likely an agent mistake rather than evidence of a true shared laundry amenity.

I looked for terms such as 'coin-op', 'coin laundry', 'card-operated laundry', 'paid laundry', and 'laundry fee' and found no matches. Given the focus on in-unit laundry and the lack of any mention of paid common laundry, it's likely there is no notable paid community laundry facility.

I searched the public remarks for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and 'community laundry' and found none. Multiple listings instead highlight in-unit washer/dryer and other amenities, suggesting there is no notable floor-by-floor community laundry setup.

Nearly all listings reference at least one parking stall and a shared parking garage, confirming building parking is universally available. Phrases like “two parking stalls included” and “parking garage” appear across multiple independent listings, so this is not a one-off agent error.

Assigned/reserved parking is strongly confirmed across the building. Multiple current remarks explicitly mention assigned stalls, including "2 assigned parking stalls" and "two separate parking stalls," across many listings and agents. This appears consistent rather than copy-paste noise.

Covered parking is consistently supported by both MLS history and current remarks. Several listings explicitly call out covered stalls or garage parking, including "2 covered parking stalls" and "secured garage." Evidence is very strong and uniform across the building.

I searched for explicit deeded-parking language like "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed" and did not find it. The remarks repeatedly describe parking as included or assigned, which is not the same as deeded ownership, so this is not supported by the text.

At least one current listing clearly advertises EV charging in the garage (“parking garage offers EV stations”), which is unlikely to be fabricated given its specificity. The absence of the EVCHRG MLS checkbox appears to be an agent oversight rather than proof the stations don’t exist.

I looked for any stated parking charge, rental fee, or monthly parking cost and found none. The remarks describe parking as included, assigned, or ample guest parking, but do not provide a separate parking fee.

Guest parking is supported by both historical MLS data and current public remarks. At least a handful of listings explicitly mention "guest parking" or similar wording, while others reference ample parking for guests. The evidence is strong and recurring across multiple listings.

Secured-entry parking is well supported, though not always stated in identical terms. Multiple listings describe a "secured parking garage" or "secure garage," and the building is consistently described as secure with 24-hour security. This indicates parking access/security is a real building feature.

While remarks do not explicitly use the word “tandem,” multiple MLS records flag TANDEM, which is typically tied to the specific deeded stall configuration and less likely to be a generic copy-paste. This suggests at least some units in the building have tandem-style parking stalls.

The building is repeatedly advertised with concierge, security, and guest parking but no listing ever mentions valet or attended parking service. Given both the complete absence of VALET in MLS data and in remarks, it is very likely the building does not offer valet parking.

I searched for references to a parking waitlist, parking queue, or waitlist signup process and found nothing. The listings talk about included or assigned parking stalls, but there is no evidence of a waitlist system in the public remarks.

Listings emphasize privacy (only three units per floor and separate elevators for certain penthouses) but never reference keyed or fob-access elevators. With no ELEVAT-type security amenity checked in any MLS entry, there is no solid evidence of a dedicated keyed elevator security system as a general building feature. Any potential restricted access appears limited and is not marketed as a building amenity.

Remarks repeatedly note security (e.g., '24-hour security', 'well-managed with 24-hour security', 'secured parking garage') but never mention key card, fob, card reader, or electronic access control. Based on the requirement to rely only on explicit public-remark evidence for this feature, card/fob access cannot be confirmed and is treated as not present.

Security guard service is extremely well supported for Waikiki Landmark. Across the provided remarks, dozens of listings explicitly mention '24-hour security,' '24/7 security,' or 'on-site 24/7 security,' making this consistent across multiple agents rather than a copy-paste anomaly. The current MLS data also shows 19/20 listings with SECGUA checked, reinforcing very high confidence.

Listings consistently highlight strong security (e.g., '24-hour security', 'vigilant 24-hour security') but do not describe a patrolling or roving security service. In the absence of explicit references to patrols in the remarks and no prior data, this feature is assumed not present.

Despite very detailed amenity descriptions (security, pools, gym, concierge, etc.), none of the listings mention security cameras, CCTV, or video monitoring. With SECSYS unchecked in all 20 MLS records, the weight of evidence indicates video security is not a defined building amenity for residents. This is treated as absent at the building-amenity level.

Central AC is strongly supported for Waikiki Landmark. Multiple current listings explicitly mention it in different ways—"central AC for year-round comfort," "Central A/C," "3 central air conditioning units," "3 zones of central AC," and "the 3 A/C units have been redone"—showing this is not a one-off or copy-paste artifact. This aligns with the historical MLS pattern, so the feature should remain true with very high confidence.

Across all 20 listings, there are no references to split, ductless, or mini‑split AC, and the MLS never flags split AC. Remarks that discuss cooling consistently describe multi‑zone central AC rather than individual split systems, so this building should not be considered to offer split AC as a feature.

None of the many listings reference window or wall AC, and the MLS never marks window units for this building. Given the strong evidence of central AC throughout and the building’s luxury profile, it is very unlikely that window AC is a building feature available to residents.

Concrete construction is strongly supported across the MLS records: 17 of 20 listings currently code the building as CONCRE. The public remarks repeatedly describe Waikiki Landmark as a high-rise, tower-style condominium, which is consistent with concrete construction and shows no sign of a recent change or copy-paste correction.

Double-wall construction has moderate-to-strong support from the MLS records, with 12 of 20 listings marked DOUWAL. The remarks are broadly consistent with a substantial luxury high-rise building, and there is no indication that this checkbox is a recent agent error or a changed condition.

Hollow-tile construction is absent from all MLS entries and never referenced in the remarks. Given the tower’s size and typical engineering in Waikiki, hollow-tile construction is very unlikely to be a primary building method here.

Masonry/stucco construction is checked in 3 out of 20 MLS entries, and the building’s style and era make a stucco-type exterior over masonry/concrete likely. No remarks contradict this, so masonry/stucco construction is reasonably inferred.

There is limited but repeated MLS evidence for steel-frame construction, with 3 of 20 listings checking STEFRA. The public remarks do not mention steel framing explicitly, so this appears to be an MLS-coded structural attribute rather than a remark-driven confirmation. Confidence is moderate because the signal is present but sparse.

A few MLS entries recognize slab construction and, given the scale of the twin 38-story towers, a concrete slab or mat foundation is structurally required. Although not marketed in remarks, slab construction is a reasonable inference for this building.

No analysis available

None of the 20 MLS listings check wood-frame construction, and the building is a tall reinforced high-rise where wood framing would not be used structurally. Remarks only mention wood flooring, not wood structure, so wood-frame construction does not apply to this building.

Above-ground construction has only a weak MLS signal, with just 3 of 20 listings showing ABOGRO. The current public remarks are extensive but never explicitly mention above-ground construction; they instead describe a standard tower/high-rise building, so this appears unsupported in the current record and likely reflects a prior MLS inconsistency.

Across all listings reviewed, brick construction is never checked in MLS and never mentioned in marketing remarks. Given local building practices and the high-rise design, brick construction can be confidently excluded for this building.

No listings mark single-wall construction and the building is a modern high-rise, where single-wall methods are not used. Both MLS data and basic engineering constraints strongly indicate there is no single-wall construction here.

The public remarks clearly state that minimum 30-day rentals are allowed, which is affirmative evidence that short-term rentals are permitted in the building. This is repeated across multiple listings, making the evidence strong and consistent.

I searched for hotel pool, hotel rental program, brand-managed pool, or similar hotel-operation language and found none. Because STR is allowed only at a 30-day minimum and there is no hotel-pool reference, this is treated as false.

I looked for language indicating required participation in a rental pool, such as mandatory hotel pool or cannot opt out, and found nothing. The remarks emphasize flexibility for owners and investors, which is inconsistent with a mandatory rental-pool structure.

At least one listing clearly advertises 'Fee-simple ownership,' confirming that fee simple units exist in Waikiki Landmark. No remarks refer to lease rent, lease expiry, or leasehold, so the building is documented as offering fee simple ownership (no FS/LH ratio is available because no LH units are described).

Across all collected remarks there are zero references to leasehold, lease rent, or lease expiration, and one listing explicitly promotes 'Fee-simple ownership.' Given how prominently leasehold terms are normally disclosed, this strongly indicates that the building does not offer leasehold units.

I looked for leasehold language such as lease expiry years, ground-lease end dates, or renewal extensions and found nothing. The only relevant tenure clue is a listing that says the building has "Fee-simple ownership," which means there is no lease-expiry year to extract from these remarks.

I searched the public remarks for explicit VA loan approval language and found none. The listings discuss amenities, views, and parking, but do not mention VA eligibility, so this remains unconfirmed and is treated as not evidenced in the remarks.

Multiple remarks directly state the building is fully insured, including "100% insured" and "fully insured" phrasing. This is strong, consistent evidence for walls-in/full HOA insurance coverage.

Fire sprinklers appear to be present based on the MLS pattern, with 14 of 20 listings checked for FIRSPR. However, the remarks do not explicitly confirm a sprinkler system, so this is supported more by the repeated MLS checkbox pattern than by agent descriptions.

I searched the public remarks for fire/life safety evaluation language, including FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, and passed fire inspection. Nothing relevant was found, so this remains unconfirmed and is treated as false due to lack of evidence in the remarks.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Ocean views are strongly supported across the building remarks. About 9 current listings explicitly mention them, with phrases like 'beautiful ocean view,' 'partial ocean vistas,' 'Pacific Ocean,' and 'panoramic Ocean.' The repeated language across multiple agents suggests this is a real building feature, not a one-off copy/paste error.

Mountain views are very well documented in the current remarks and historical data. Roughly 13 of 20 listings reference them directly, using phrases like 'mountain views,' 'Mauka,' 'Koolau Mountain vistas,' and 'unobstructed mountain.' This is consistent across many different listings and agents.

Diamond Head views are confirmed by multiple listings and are repeatedly paired with ocean/city/mountain views. The language is explicit—such as 'DH view' and 'iconic Diamond Head'—which makes this high-confidence for building search purposes.

City views are one of the most consistently documented features in the building. Around 16 of 20 listings mention them explicitly, with terms such as 'city views,' 'city skyline,' and 'cityscape.' The volume and consistency make this a high-confidence building-level feature.

Coastline views are not well supported in the remarks. While many listings mention ocean and canal views, none of the current remarks explicitly say 'coastline,' 'shoreline,' or 'coastal view,' and historical support is limited to only 3 of 20 listings. This looks like a weak MLS tag rather than a reliably documented building feature.

Listings describe residents enjoying a 'lushly landscaped garden oasis' and a 'beautifully landscaped garden retreat' in conjunction with building amenities. These phrases imply that at least some units or common areas look out onto landscaped garden spaces, making garden views a real feature of the property.

I am correcting this to false because the remarks do not support any golf course view. The available text mentions proximity to a golf course at most, but no listing says the building or units have fairway, greens, or golf course views.

Marina-style views are supported through many mentions of the Ala Wai Canal and similar water-adjacent outlooks. About 9 of 20 listings reference canal/harbor-style views, such as 'Ala Wai Canal,' 'canal view,' and 'beautiful views of the mountains, canal.' This appears to be a real recurring feature, though the wording varies by agent.

Sunrise exposure is directly supported by several current listings. Roughly 10 of 20 listings mention sunrise or morning light, including phrases like 'sweeping sunrise' and 'sunrise highlighting serene mountain views.' The feature appears consistently enough to include with high confidence.

Sunset views are clearly present in the current remarks. About 7 of 20 listings mention them directly, with phrases like 'unforgettable Hawaiian sunsets' and 'unwinding at sunset.' This is solid evidence that at least some units in the building have sunset exposure.

Agents describe a wide variety of views (ocean, mountains, Diamond Head, city, canal, gardens) but never mention cemeteries or any similar feature. Given the volume and detail of the marketing remarks, it's very likely that cemetery views are not present or relevant for this building.

Listings describe many view types yet do not mention viewing fireworks from lanais or units. Without explicit statements about fireworks visibility, this feature is marked as not present by default.

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

Resident management is strongly supported across the listings, with 13 of 20 MLS records checking RESMAN and multiple remarks describing on-site staff. Agents consistently refer to a 'General Manager on-site,' 'Residential Specialist,' and a 'building manager,' which makes this a clear building feature rather than copy-paste noise.

No analysis available

No analysis available