Waikiki Landmark

MLS property data overwhelmingly lists 1992 as the year built (36 of 37 listings), with one outlier at 1999. In the absence of any remarks contradicting this, 1992 is taken as the construction year.

MLS floor fields and unit-number floors agree through 37, including penthouse unit 3704. The county count of 32 and state registration field of 35 are set aside because these records can count floors differently from the top residential floor.

The county's reconciled condominium-unit count is 353 and the state registration independently reports 353 units; the parcel contains one building record, so the count applies to this building.

Owner occupancy from AOUO registration(s) 2395. Refreshed by Real_Estate_Scraper/reb_registry/propagate_owner_occupancy.py, which this lock does not block.

The remarks mention separate elevators for penthouse access, but provide no total number of elevators. Because there is no explicit conflicting count, the current value of 6 is retained with low confidence.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Central air inclusion is supported by 8 of 20 current MLS records and repeated remarks across different listings. Remarks reference "central AC," "3-zones of central AC," and association-supplied cooling, providing strong confirmation.

Cable inclusion appears in 10 of 20 current listings. The explicit reference to a $52 monthly fee for "basic TV cable" provides direct confirmation beyond checkbox data.

Thirteen of 20 current listings include OTCOEX or an electricity-related inclusion. The explicit statement that maintenance fees include "every utility ... electricity" supports common-area electricity coverage, although most other remarks rely on recurring MLS inclusion data.

Remarks repeatedly reference fee-simple ownership and condo-style amenities, never co-op terminology or co-op tax obligations. The complete absence of COOTAX in the MLS confirms that cooperative taxes are not part of the maintenance fees.

A detailed, non-boilerplate remark specifically lists electricity as included in the maintenance fees along with water, trash, and sewer. Even though MLS checkboxes do not consistently reflect this, the explicit narrative description provides strong evidence that electricity is included building-wide.

The building appears to be an all-electric high-rise, with no gas ranges or gas infrastructure mentioned in any listing. With no MLS records indicating gas in the HOA, it is very likely that gas is not provided or included in the maintenance fees.

Hot water inclusion is strongly supported by 16 of 20 current MLS records. The two WTRHTR entries are minority exceptions, and the available remarks do not contradict the prevailing building-level inclusion.

Internet inclusion is marked in 8 of 20 current listings, but no public remark specifically says internet or Wi-Fi is included. The evidence is moderate and may partly reflect copied MLS checkbox data.

Across all remarks, there is no mention of marina facilities, boat slips, or marina-related amenities. Combined with the complete absence of MARINA in the MLS data, this indicates marina fees or access are not part of the association dues.

Sewer is included in 18 of 20 current listings, showing strong cross-listing support. The phrase "every utility including ... sewer" provides explicit confirmation from a listing remark.

Water inclusion is shown in 19 of 20 current listings, making the evidence highly consistent across the building. A detailed remark explicitly names water among the utilities included in maintenance fees.

BBQ facilities are overwhelmingly supported, with many listings mentioning “BBQ areas,” “BBQ grills,” “gas BBQ's,” “BBQ pavilions,” and “barbecue.” The repeated detailed descriptions across numerous listings establish this as a genuine shared building amenity.

0/20 listings reference any form of bicycle storage, and the amenity descriptions consistently omit bike rooms or racks while highlighting many other facilities. Given the breadth of detail agents provide for this luxury building, the absence of any bike-storage mention strongly indicates that dedicated bike storage is not available.

The building overlooks the canal but is not marketed with dock or marina access. The consistent absence of any 'boat dock' or 'marina' language suggests there is no boat docking amenity for residents.

The car wash is directly confirmed in several listings, including “car wash in the garage,” “parking garage offers ... a car wash,” and “convenient car wash in the garage for residents.” Repeated specific references across multiple listings support this shared facility.

I did not find convincing evidence of a true clubhouse amenity in the remarks. The building is repeatedly described with pools, gym, lounge, meeting room, and community/recreation spaces, but not a dedicated clubhouse, so this appears unsupported.

Concierge service is clearly established, appearing in 6 of 20 current MLS listings and in numerous detailed remarks. Repeated phrases such as 'concierge services with multilingual staff,' 'multi-lingual concierge,' and 'concierge level staff' provide strong confirmation across multiple listings.

Listings frequently note that the building is pet-friendly but never reference a dedicated dog park or run. Given the lack of textual evidence and almost no MLS support, the building likely does not offer a formal dog park.

Doorman service is supported by the current MLS data in 9 of 20 listings and by an explicit remark stating the building has a "doorman." Several additional listings describe concierge services, residential specialists, and staffed lobby/front-entry assistance, reinforcing that the building provides attended entry or lobby service, although some agents may use related terminology interchangeably.

Exercise facilities are very strongly corroborated across the listings, with well over 15 remarks referring to a gym, fitness center, fitness facility, or exercise gym. The repeated descriptions across many agents—including updated and state-of-the-art fitness centers—indicate a genuine shared building amenity rather than an isolated copy-paste claim.

The building offers concierge and 24-hour security, but there is no indication of any limousine, town car, or similar transportation service. The silence on this specific luxury feature suggests it is not available.

Meeting facilities are strongly corroborated by phrases including “conference room,” “meeting room,” “beautiful meeting room,” and “a conference room & more.” The feature is reported by many agents, including in detailed amenity descriptions, making it highly reliable.

Patio/deck space is overwhelmingly confirmed across the building: at least 14 of 20 listings contain MLS patio/deck indicators, while numerous remarks explicitly mention a “private lanai,” “covered lanai,” “broad lanai,” “170 sq.ft. lanai,” and “HUGE 840 sq.ft. lanai.” Multiple listings also describe the shared “pool deck” or “outdoor recreation deck,” so this is strong building-wide evidence rather than a single copied remark.

The building is near outdoor areas where residents can walk or jog, but no remarks indicate a dedicated jogging or fitness path as part of the property. The lack of any such mention strongly suggests this amenity does not exist.

Amenities like a kids pool are mentioned but no outdoor play structure or playground is described. The consistent omission plus zero MLS checkmarks indicate there is no children's playground amenity.

No analysis available

Extensive amenity descriptions cover pools, gym, BBQ, lounges, and meeting rooms, but never any putting green. This makes it very likely that a putting green is not part of the building amenities.

The building’s shared recreation area is repeatedly confirmed through references to an “expansive Rec Deck,” “outdoor recreation deck,” “wonderful recreation deck,” and pool-deck recreation spaces. These descriptions occur across multiple listings and clearly establish a building-level amenity.

Multiple listings identify indoor recreation-style spaces using phrases such as “party area,” “stylish lounge,” “entertainment area,” “lounge with seating and TV,” and “exclusive community room.” Although terminology varies, the repeated references support a shared recreation or entertainment room.

No listing explicitly mentions an in-building restaurant, café, or on-site dining facility. References such as "world-class dining," "gourmet dining," and "restaurants within walking distance" clearly describe surrounding Waikiki amenities, so the isolated 1/20 MLS checkbox should not establish a building restaurant.

The phrase 'deluxe rooftop pool with panoramic ocean and city views' directly indicates rooftop-level amenities. While MLS checkboxes omit ROOFDCK, detailed remarks from at least one agent plus descriptions of elevated pool decks support treating rooftop access/amenities as present.

One listing explicitly identifies a shared “sauna” on the pool deck alongside hot tubs and BBQ facilities. Other listings generally omit the sauna while describing related amenities, but the direct explicit mention is sufficient to confirm that the building offers one.

0/20 recent listings advertise building storage units or lockers, and none check storage-related amenities in the MLS. Remarks repeatedly list extensive amenities (pools, cabanas, gym, meeting room, car wash, concierge, etc.) but never mention common-area storage, suggesting such facilities are not provided or are not a marketed feature.

The listings mention beaches, surfing as a nearby activity, parking, and various building amenities. They do not identify dedicated surfboard or board storage facilities.

Tennis court access is weakly evidenced in the current remarks, but the historical MLS data still shows it in a small number of listings. There are no explicit current mentions of a tennis court or tennis facilities, so this looks more like sparse MLS support than a fully confirmed amenity. I would keep it tentatively, but with much lower confidence than the other shared amenities.

Trash chute availability remains supported by current MLS data, with TRACHU selected in 15 of 20 listings. The public remarks do not specifically quote or describe the chute system, but the high and consistent MLS representation, together with the prior high-confidence record, supports retaining the feature.

No analysis available

The remarks focus on the grand lobby, recreation deck, pools, and location at the 'gateway to Waikiki' but never describe the property as gated, fenced, or walled. With just a single MLS instance of a gated/wall/fence amenity against 19 without it and no textual support, the best interpretation is that the building does not have a defined perimeter wall/fence or gated-community setup. The feature is therefore treated as absent.

Whirlpool facilities are very strongly supported by repeated references to “two whirlpool spas,” “heated pools, whirlpools,” “Jacuzzi,” “2 jacuzzies,” and “hot tubs.” The amenity is consistently described as part of the shared pool deck or recreation deck.

Swimming pools are consistently confirmed across the listings, with well over 20 remarks mentioning features such as “three resort-style pools,” “heated pools,” “adult and keiki swimming pools,” “large lap pool,” and “multiple pools.” The repeated detailed descriptions from many listings and the 20/20 current MLS amenity indication provide overwhelming evidence that the building offers shared swimming pools.

At least six supplied listings explicitly mention heated pools, including "heated pools," "Largest residential heated pool with spa," "3 heated pools," and "Waikiki's largest heated private pool." The repeated references across distinct listings, together with HEAPOO appearing in 13/20 current MLS records and the historical high-confidence evidence, strongly confirm that the building has a heated swimming pool.

The remarks repeatedly describe multiple, heated, lap, adult, children’s, and resort-style pools. None identifies the pool water as saltwater, so saltwater construction is not supported by the public remarks.

In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the building: 20/20 current listings include washer/dryer in the MLS inclusions. Multiple remarks from different listings explicitly mention "in-unit laundry," a "stacked Miele washer & ventless dryer," and a "built in washer and dryer," confirming this is not solely an unchecked or copied MLS field.

Across all provided remarks, there are no mentions of community or shared laundry rooms, coin laundry, or laundry facilities on any floor, despite detailed descriptions of amenities. Instead, multiple listings focus on in-unit washer/dryers, making it unlikely that a separate community laundry is a notable building feature. The lone MLS COMLAU entry is likely an agent mistake rather than evidence of a true shared laundry amenity.

The remarks reference washers and dryers within individual units, not shared laundry facilities. No paid laundry service or payment method is described.

The remarks mention in-unit washers and dryers in some residences, but that does not establish community laundry facilities. No public remark describes laundry rooms available on every floor.

Nearly all listings reference at least one parking stall and a shared parking garage, confirming building parking is universally available. Phrases like “two parking stalls included” and “parking garage” appear across multiple independent listings, so this is not a one-off agent error.

Assigned parking is strongly confirmed across the building, with numerous listings mentioning "dedicated," "assigned," or included parking stalls, often two per unit. The evidence appears across many listings and agents, not just a single copied remark.

Covered parking is conclusively supported across the building, with multiple listings explicitly mentioning covered stalls or a parking garage. The feature is consistently reflected in both MLS data and independent listing remarks.

Parking is repeatedly described as included with the unit, with two covered stalls conveying and multiple assigned or dedicated stalls. Although the word "deeded" is not consistently used, the repeated conveyance and ownership language strongly supports deeded parking.

At least one current listing clearly advertises EV charging in the garage (“parking garage offers EV stations”), which is unlikely to be fabricated given its specificity. The absence of the EVCHRG MLS checkbox appears to be an agent oversight rather than proof the stations don’t exist.

The remarks were searched for parking fees, monthly parking charges, parking rental costs, and additional parking expenses. Multiple listings describe assigned, covered, dedicated, or included parking, but none gives a parking fee amount or confirms whether a recurring fee applies.

Guest parking is confirmed as a building amenity, though it appears in fewer remarks than assigned or covered parking. Multiple listings explicitly state “guest parking,” “ample guest parking,” or “lots of parking for your guests,” providing strong corroboration across different descriptions.

Secured parking entry is strongly supported by multiple explicit remarks, including "secured parking garage," "secure garage," and descriptions of the building as secure. The evidence is reinforced by 13 of 20 MLS records and appears across multiple listings.

While remarks do not explicitly use the word “tandem,” multiple MLS records flag TANDEM, which is typically tied to the specific deeded stall configuration and less likely to be a generic copy-paste. This suggests at least some units in the building have tandem-style parking stalls.

The building is repeatedly advertised with concierge, security, and guest parking but no listing ever mentions valet or attended parking service. Given both the complete absence of VALET in MLS data and in remarks, it is very likely the building does not offer valet parking.

The remarks were searched for parking waitlist, parking waiting list, and instructions to join a parking waitlist. No such system is mentioned, while parking is repeatedly represented as assigned or included, so a waitlist is not indicated.

Listings emphasize privacy (only three units per floor and separate elevators for certain penthouses) but never reference keyed or fob-access elevators. With no ELEVAT-type security amenity checked in any MLS entry, there is no solid evidence of a dedicated keyed elevator security system as a general building feature. Any potential restricted access appears limited and is not marketed as a building amenity.

The listings repeatedly mention 24-hour security, secured parking, concierge services, lobby personnel, and residential specialists. They do not describe a card- or fob-based access system.

More than 25 listings explicitly mention security service, commonly stating "24-hour security," "24/7 security," or "on-site 24/7 security." The evidence is strong across numerous listings and agents, and it aligns with the historical high-confidence record and current MLS data showing SECGUA in 19/20 listings.

The remarks consistently advertise 24-hour security and on-site personnel, but continuous security presence does not establish patrol service. No public remark specifically describes security patrols.

Despite very detailed amenity descriptions (security, pools, gym, concierge, etc.), none of the listings mention security cameras, CCTV, or video monitoring. With SECSYS unchecked in all 20 MLS records, the weight of evidence indicates video security is not a defined building amenity for residents. This is treated as absent at the building-amenity level.

At least 9 listings explicitly mention central AC or equivalent systems, including “two central AC outlets,” “complete with central AC,” “new zoned AC systems,” “3 central air conditioning units,” “Central A/C,” and “3-zones of central AC.” The evidence is strong across multiple listings and agents, and is consistent with the high historical confidence and widespread MLS indicators rather than relying solely on copied checkbox data.

Across all 20 listings, there are no references to split, ductless, or mini‑split AC, and the MLS never flags split AC. Remarks that discuss cooling consistently describe multi‑zone central AC rather than individual split systems, so this building should not be considered to offer split AC as a feature.

None of the many listings reference window or wall AC, and the MLS never marks window units for this building. Given the strong evidence of central AC throughout and the building’s luxury profile, it is very unlikely that window AC is a building feature available to residents.

Concrete construction is indicated in 18 of 20 current listings through the CONCRE designation, providing strong and consistent MLS evidence across multiple listings. Public remarks generally focus on amenities and unit features and do not explicitly state construction materials, but none contradict the concrete designation; the evidence is sufficiently broad to confirm the feature.

Double-wall construction appears in 13 of 20 current listings through the DOUWAL designation, providing substantial MLS support. None of the public remarks explicitly says "double wall" or "two walls," so the evidence is primarily checkbox-based rather than narrative.

Hollow-tile construction is absent from all MLS entries and never referenced in the remarks. Given the tower’s size and typical engineering in Waikiki, hollow-tile construction is very unlikely to be a primary building method here.

Masonry/stucco construction is checked in 3 out of 20 MLS entries, and the building’s style and era make a stucco-type exterior over masonry/concrete likely. No remarks contradict this, so masonry/stucco construction is reasonably inferred.

Five of 20 current listings identify STEFRA construction materials, while no public remarks explicitly mention "steel frame" or "steel frame construction." The signal is limited and may reflect inconsistent listing entry, but the previously high-confidence building record supports retaining the feature.

Concrete slab construction appears in just 2 of 20 current MLS records, with no supporting remarks. The limited checkbox evidence does not establish slab construction reliably for the building.

0 of 20 listings explicitly mention stone construction or a stone exterior. Several listings mention interior stone-related finishes, including 'natural stone marble flooring' and 'marble/stone flooring,' but these do not validate the building's construction; the lone MLS checkbox appears likely to be copy-paste or misclassified material data.

None of the 20 MLS listings check wood-frame construction, and the building is a tall reinforced high-rise where wood framing would not be used structurally. Remarks only mention wood flooring, not wood structure, so wood-frame construction does not apply to this building.

Above-ground construction is identified in 3 of 20 current listings through the ABOGRO designation, which is a weak current frequency signal. The extensive public remarks contain no phrases such as "above ground construction" or "above ground building," but the prior high-confidence record supports retaining it.

Across all listings reviewed, brick construction is never checked in MLS and never mentioned in marketing remarks. Given local building practices and the high-rise design, brick construction can be confidently excluded for this building.

No listings mark single-wall construction and the building is a modern high-rise, where single-wall methods are not used. Both MLS data and basic engineering constraints strongly indicate there is no single-wall construction here.

The repeated 30-day minimum requirement is explicit evidence that short-term rentals are not allowed under the stated building rules. Rentals may be permitted for 30 days or longer, but that does not qualify as STR under this analysis.

The remarks were searched for hotel rental pools, hotel management programs, branded rental programs, and similar terms. Because STR is not allowed, this feature must also be false.

The remarks were searched for mandatory participation, required rental programs, and inability to opt out. No such requirement was found, and the STR prerequisite is not met, so mandatory pool participation is false.

At least one listing clearly advertises 'Fee-simple ownership,' confirming that fee simple units exist in Waikiki Landmark. No remarks refer to lease rent, lease expiry, or leasehold, so the building is documented as offering fee simple ownership (no FS/LH ratio is available because no LH units are described).

Across all collected remarks there are zero references to leasehold, lease rent, or lease expiration, and one listing explicitly promotes 'Fee-simple ownership.' Given how prominently leasehold terms are normally disclosed, this strongly indicates that the building does not offer leasehold units.

The remarks were searched for leasehold status, ground leases, lease expiration, renewal terms, and four-digit expiry years. No applicable lease-expiry year was found, so the value is unknown.

The remarks were searched for explicit language such as VA approved, VA financing, and VA loans accepted. The isolated loan-assumption reference is insufficient to confirm building VA approval, so the feature remains unverified.

Several listings provide direct, repeated evidence of comprehensive building insurance. The explicit statements that the property is 100% insured and the building is fully insured support a high-confidence true value.

Fire sprinklers are strongly supported by current MLS data, appearing in 16 of 20 listings, and are explicitly mentioned in multiple remarks. Key phrases include "fire safety required sprinkler systems" and "Building & apt have fire sprinklers," confirming this is a building feature rather than an isolated unit detail.

The remarks contain references to fire sprinklers and extinguishers, but no evidence of a passed fire/life safety evaluation. The feature is therefore not supported as true; it is recorded as false with medium-low confidence because the remarks discuss related safety equipment.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Ocean views are strongly supported across the listings, including phrases such as “sweeping ocean,” “panoramic views of the Pacific Ocean,” “beautiful ocean view,” and “partial ocean vistas.” The evidence appears across multiple agents and unit stacks, confirming that the building offers ocean-view residences.

Mountain views are extensively documented, including “sweeping mountain,” “unobstructed views of the Koolaus,” “Mauka breezes,” and “majestic Koolau Mountain vistas.” References occur across many units and agents, making this a strong building-level feature.

Listings specifically mention “Diamond Head,” “DH view,” and “iconic Diamond Head,” often alongside ocean, city, canal, or mountain views. These references occur in more than one listing and establish that some building units offer Diamond Head views.

City views are the most frequently supported view type, with 17 of 20 current listings containing CITY. Remarks include “sweeping city,” “city skyline,” “cityscape,” “city lights,” and panoramic Honolulu views across numerous stacks, indicating broad and reliable evidence.

Direct “coastline” wording is limited, and most remarks instead describe ocean, canal, or waterfront views. Nevertheless, 3/20 current MLS records and the prior high-confidence building determination support retaining this feature, with lower confidence than the other view types.

Listings describe residents enjoying a 'lushly landscaped garden oasis' and a 'beautifully landscaped garden retreat' in conjunction with building amenities. These phrases imply that at least some units or common areas look out onto landscaped garden spaces, making garden views a real feature of the property.

Golf-course evidence is substantially weaker than for the other views. One remark references being “conveniently located near ... Golf Course,” which indicates proximity, not necessarily a view, while the current MLS count shows 4 listings with golf-course text; the feature should therefore be retained cautiously due to the prior High-confidence designation.

The listings repeatedly mention “Ala Wai Canal,” “canal views,” and watching paddlers or boats across the water. Although agents generally call it a canal rather than a marina, the repeated waterway/harbor evidence across multiple units supports inclusion of the marina-view feature.

Sunrise exposure is supported by multiple explicit remarks, including “wake up to natural light from the sunrise,” “sunrise highlighting serene mountain views,” and “gorgeous views of Waikiki, Diamond Head, mountains and sunrise.” The references come from distinct listings rather than a single isolated statement, confirming that some building units offer sunrise views.

Remarks include “sweeping sunrise, sunset,” “unwinding at sunset,” and “unforgettable Hawaiian sunsets.” These descriptions are repeated across multiple listings, confirming that some units provide sunset views.

Agents describe a wide variety of views (ocean, mountains, Diamond Head, city, canal, gardens) but never mention cemeteries or any similar feature. Given the volume and detail of the marketing remarks, it's very likely that cemetery views are not present or relevant for this building.

Multiple listings explicitly indicate that fireworks can be viewed from unit lanais. One listing specifically identifies the Friday night Hilton Hawaiian Village fireworks, satisfying the required from-unit view criterion.

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

Resident management is strongly supported by current MLS data, appearing in 15 of 20 listings, with multiple remarks describing on-site or building management staff. Explicit phrases include "General Manager on-site," "dedicated General Manager," and "responsive building manager," providing strong confirmation across listings.

No analysis available

No analysis available