Waikiki Landmark

MLS property data overwhelmingly lists 1992 as the year built (36 of 37 listings), with one outlier at 1999. In the absence of any remarks contradicting this, 1992 is taken as the construction year.

Remarks state the building 'features two, 38-story towers bridged together at the penthouse levels,' which directly establishes a 38-floor height. Other listings referencing high floors and penthouses align with this count, with no conflicting floor totals mentioned.

A listing explicitly notes the building as 'only 196 residential units,' implying this is the total unit count for the project. No other remarks or data contradict this figure, so it is adopted as the building's unit_total.

I searched for explicit owner-occupancy statements (percentages like '80% owner occupied' or qualitative phrases such as 'majority owner occupied') and found none in the remarks. Per numeric-field rules, because a current value exists and remarks do not confirm or contradict it, the current value (52.00) is retained with low confidence.

The public remarks reference "separate elevators" and elevator access to upper floors but do not state a total number. Per rules, because the current numeric value exists and remarks do not explicitly confirm a count, we keep the current value of 6 with low confidence. I searched for explicit phrases like '6 elevators', 'six elevators', or '4 elevators' and found none.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

11 of 20 listings have ACCEN checked and multiple remarks explicitly mention "central AC", "3-zones of central AC", and "New zoned AC systems", providing consistent building-level evidence from several agents that central air is provided/managed as part of the building.

7 of 20 current listings have CABTV in association_fee_includes. One remark explicitly states "Other fee of $52/mo. is for basic TV cable," while other listings do not clearly state cable is excluded. The presence of CABTV checkboxes across multiple MLS records indicates some units/building offerings include cable, but agent copy/paste inconsistency reduces certainty.

12 of 20 listings flag common-area electric; remarks include explicit language such as "maintenance fees includes EVERY utility including... electricity" and numerous agents describe extensive common-area amenities (pools, gym, lounges) that imply the association covers common electricity.

Remarks repeatedly reference fee-simple ownership and condo-style amenities, never co-op terminology or co-op tax obligations. The complete absence of COOTAX in the MLS confirms that cooperative taxes are not part of the maintenance fees.

A detailed, non-boilerplate remark specifically lists electricity as included in the maintenance fees along with water, trash, and sewer. Even though MLS checkboxes do not consistently reflect this, the explicit narrative description provides strong evidence that electricity is included building-wide.

The building appears to be an all-electric high-rise, with no gas ranges or gas infrastructure mentioned in any listing. With no MLS records indicating gas in the HOA, it is very likely that gas is not provided or included in the maintenance fees.

15 of 20 current listings have HOTWAT checked and 0 of 20 list WTRHTR in inclusions; historical MLS entries also showed hot water included. No public remarks contradict building-supplied hot water, so evidence supports hot water being included in maintenance fees.

6 of 20 listings flag internet service, but public remarks and marketing consistently list included utilities ("electricity, water, trash and sewer") while omitting internet/Wi‑Fi. Multiple agents' remarks and the low MLS checkbox prevalence indicate internet is not reliably included in the maintenance fee.

Across all remarks, there is no mention of marina facilities, boat slips, or marina-related amenities. Combined with the complete absence of MARINA in the MLS data, this indicates marina fees or access are not part of the association dues.

19 of 20 listings have SEWER checked and at least one remark explicitly lists "electricity, water, trash and sewer" as included in maintenance fees. The consistency across many listings and agent remarks provides strong, building-wide evidence that sewer is included.

19 of 20 listings flag WATER as included and agent remarks repeatedly state maintenance fees include water ("maintenance fees includes EVERY utility including ... water"). The near-universal MLS checkbox and repeated agent language indicate water is included with high confidence.

Well supported: 19/20 MLS listings mark BBQ and many public remarks reference 'BBQ areas,' 'gas BBQs,' 'barbecue grills,' and 'BBQ/entertainment areas' on the rec/pool decks. Evidence is consistent across multiple agents and listings.

0/20 listings reference any form of bicycle storage, and the amenity descriptions consistently omit bike rooms or racks while highlighting many other facilities. Given the breadth of detail agents provide for this luxury building, the absence of any bike-storage mention strongly indicates that dedicated bike storage is not available.

The building overlooks the canal but is not marketed with dock or marina access. The consistent absence of any 'boat dock' or 'marina' language suggests there is no boat docking amenity for residents.

Multiple listings and MLS checkboxes (17/20) explicitly mention a resident car wash in the parking garage. Remarks include phrases like 'car wash' and 'convenient car wash in the garage,' indicating a resident-accessible car wash facility.

Agents describe many amenities (rec deck, pools, gym, meeting room, community room, concierge) but do not mention any dedicated clubhouse. The few MLS checkmarks likely reflect mis-clicks rather than a true clubhouse facility.

Several listings clearly advertise 'concierge services with multilingual staff' and 'multi-lingual concierge', distinguishing this from basic security. These phrases appear across different units and agents, indicating a consistent, building-wide concierge offering. The CONCIE amenity being checked in 6 of 20 MLS records aligns with and reinforces the remarks evidence.

Listings frequently note that the building is pet-friendly but never reference a dedicated dog park or run. Given the lack of textual evidence and almost no MLS support, the building likely does not offer a formal dog park.

More than a dozen listings mention front-of-house staff, e.g., 'Residential Specialist available to assist owners and guests at the beautifully appointed lobby entrance', 'concierge services with multilingual staff', and 'concierge level staff.' These repeated, detailed descriptions across multiple agents strongly confirm a doorman/lobby attendant function.

Strong evidence across listings: 19/20 MLS listings mark EXEROO and many remarks explicitly state 'fitness center,' 'gym,' or 'fully equipped fitness facility.' Multiple independent agent remarks consistently describe an updated/renovated fitness center, indicating building-level amenity accessible to residents.

The building offers concierge and 24-hour security, but there is no indication of any limousine, town car, or similar transportation service. The silence on this specific luxury feature suggests it is not available.

Consistent evidence: 17/20 MLS listings indicate meeting room and many remarks mention a 'meeting room,' 'conference room,' or 'community room' adjacent to the lobby or amenities, supporting a building-level meeting/conference space.

Both historical MLS data (14/20 listings checked PATDEC/COVPAT) and numerous current public remarks confirm building outdoor space: many listings advertise private lanais and shared amenities such as an "outdoor recreation deck with three resort-style pools," "stunning pool deck," "Rec Deck featuring a large pool, BBQ areas, cabanas," and "pool deck with three swimming pools, whirlpools, gas BBQ's and cabana area." Evidence is consistent across multiple agents and listings, indicating the building offers both private lanais and substantial shared patio/deck amenities.

The building is near outdoor areas where residents can walk or jog, but no remarks indicate a dedicated jogging or fitness path as part of the property. The lack of any such mention strongly suggests this amenity does not exist.

Amenities like a kids pool are mentioned but no outdoor play structure or playground is described. The consistent omission plus zero MLS checkmarks indicate there is no children's playground amenity.

No analysis available

Extensive amenity descriptions cover pools, gym, BBQ, lounges, and meeting rooms, but never any putting green. This makes it very likely that a putting green is not part of the building amenities.

Multiple remarks repeatedly reference an 'expansive rec deck,' 'outdoor recreation deck,' 'recreation area,' and 'entertainment area' with pools and cabanas. Even though only 5/20 MLS checkboxes currently show RECARE, the descriptive remarks across listings provide strong evidence of a shared recreation area.

Remarks frequently mention an expansive 'Rec Deck' plus indoor/outdoor social spaces such as a 'stylish lounge with seating and TV,' 'lounge with kitchenette,' 'entertainment area with a flat-screen TV,' 'recreation area,' 'conference room,' and 'exclusive community room.' These spaces fit the definition of shared recreation/entertainment rooms available to residents. With explicit references in multiple listings and MLS amenities often marking RECROO, a building recreation room/area is strongly supported.

Remarks emphasize nearby 'gourmet dining' and 'gourmet level restaurants' but clearly position them as neighborhood amenities, not part of the building. With no explicit reference to an in-building restaurant, this amenity should be considered absent.

The phrase 'deluxe rooftop pool with panoramic ocean and city views' directly indicates rooftop-level amenities. While MLS checkboxes omit ROOFDCK, detailed remarks from at least one agent plus descriptions of elevated pool decks support treating rooftop access/amenities as present.

Agents frequently describe pools, jacuzzies, spas, and gyms, but never a sauna or steam room. Given how often amenities are itemized, this omission strongly indicates that a sauna is not part of the building's offerings.

0/20 recent listings advertise building storage units or lockers, and none check storage-related amenities in the MLS. Remarks repeatedly list extensive amenities (pools, cabanas, gym, meeting room, car wash, concierge, etc.) but never mention common-area storage, suggesting such facilities are not provided or are not a marketed feature.

The public remarks list many amenities (multiple pools, gym, BBQ areas, cabanas, car wash, meeting rooms, security, etc.) but never mention any type of surfboard or board storage. I specifically searched for phrases like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', and 'bike and surfboard storage' and found none, so it is likely this building does not offer dedicated surfboard storage.

Across all provided remarks, amenities such as multiple pools, spas, gym, BBQ areas, lounges, and meeting rooms are described in detail, but tennis courts are never referenced. The near-total absence of tennis in both historical and current narrative descriptions, combined with just 1/20 MLS records checking the tennis box, indicates the building does not offer tennis court facilities. This appears to be a case of occasional MLS miscoding rather than a missing or new feature.

Mostly implied: 18/20 MLS listings mark TRACHU and the building is a high-rise full-amenity property—strong historical MLS signal. However, the current public remarks set does not explicitly state 'trash chute' or 'garbage chute,' so confidence is moderate (implied by MLS checkbox prevalence rather than explicit remark confirmations).

No analysis available

The remarks focus on the grand lobby, recreation deck, pools, and location at the 'gateway to Waikiki' but never describe the property as gated, fenced, or walled. With just a single MLS instance of a gated/wall/fence amenity against 19 without it and no textual support, the best interpretation is that the building does not have a defined perimeter wall/fence or gated-community setup. The feature is therefore treated as absent.

Supported by many remarks: 15/20 MLS listings mark whirlpool and numerous public descriptions mention 'Jacuzzi,' 'hot tubs,' or 'whirlpools' (e.g., '2 whirlpools,' 'adult spa'), confirming spa/whirlpool amenities on the amenity deck.

Very strong evidence that the building has multiple swimming pools: historical MLS data indicates 20/20 listings list pool amenities, and the public remarks repeatedly reference 'resort-style pools', 'three resort-style pools', 'multi-level pools', 'large pool', 'pool deck', 'cabana', 'whirlpools' and similar language across numerous agent remarks, indicating consistent confirmation from multiple listings rather than isolated copy/paste.

Strong evidence the building's pools are heated: MLS checkbox HEAPOO appears in 13/20 listings and several agent remarks explicitly mention 'heated pool(s)' and 'largest residential heated pool,' appearing across multiple listings rather than a single listing, supporting inclusion of pool_heated=true.

All provided public remarks were searched for any indication that the swimming pools are salt water (terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater', 'saline', or 'salt pool'). None of the many detailed descriptions of the amenity deck and multiple pools referenced salt water systems, so the pool is assumed not to be salt water based on available remarks. This could be updated if future listings explicitly describe the pool as salt water.

Strong evidence that the building offers in-unit laundry: 19 of 20 MLS records list washer/dryer in the inclusions and multiple remarks explicitly state 'in-unit laundry', 'stacked Miele washer & ventless dryer', 'built in washer and dryer', and 'new washer/dryer'. The mentions appear across different listings and agents rather than being limited to a single posting, indicating the feature is widely available in the building.

Across all provided remarks, there are no mentions of community or shared laundry rooms, coin laundry, or laundry facilities on any floor, despite detailed descriptions of amenities. Instead, multiple listings focus on in-unit washer/dryers, making it unlikely that a separate community laundry is a notable building feature. The lone MLS COMLAU entry is likely an agent mistake rather than evidence of a true shared laundry amenity.

I looked for terms such as 'coin-op', 'coin laundry', 'card-operated laundry', 'paid laundry', and 'laundry fee' and found no matches. Given the focus on in-unit laundry and the lack of any mention of paid common laundry, it's likely there is no notable paid community laundry facility.

I searched the public remarks for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and 'community laundry' and found none. Multiple listings instead highlight in-unit washer/dryer and other amenities, suggesting there is no notable floor-by-floor community laundry setup.

Nearly all listings reference at least one parking stall and a shared parking garage, confirming building parking is universally available. Phrases like “two parking stalls included” and “parking garage” appear across multiple independent listings, so this is not a one-off agent error.

Strong evidence across listings: ~19 of 20 MLS records indicate assigned parking and multiple remarks explicitly state 'two assigned parking stalls' or '2 assigned, covered parking stalls.' Statements appear in independent remarks from multiple agents (e.g., 'two assigned parking stalls', '2 assigned, covered parking stalls'), indicating building-level assigned/reserved parking is reliably offered.

Clear, consistent evidence: all 20 MLS records include covered/garage parking and many remarks state 'covered parking stalls', 'two covered stalls', or 'covered parking garage.' Multiple independent listings mention 'covered stalls' and 'secure garage', confirming covered resident parking throughout the building.

Searched for explicit wording like 'deeded parking' or 'parking included in deed'. Listings consistently mention assigned/covered stalls included with units but do not state they are deeded, so there is no evidence parking is deeded.

At least one current listing clearly advertises EV charging in the garage (“parking garage offers EV stations”), which is unlikely to be fabricated given its specificity. The absence of the EVCHRG MLS checkbox appears to be an agent oversight rather than proof the stations don’t exist.

Searched for phrases such as 'parking fee', 'monthly parking charge', or 'parking rental'. Remarks instead indicate parking stalls are included/assigned; no standalone parking fee amount is provided.

Moderately strong evidence: 13 of 20 MLS records include guest parking and several remarks explicitly mention 'guest parking', 'guest parking and 24/7 security', or 'plenty of parking for your guests.' The amenity is consistently listed across many agent remarks, indicating guest parking is available in the building.

Good evidence of controlled access: 14 of 20 MLS records include secured-entry parking and multiple remarks reference a 'secured garage' or 'secured parking garage', along with 24-hour security and concierge services. The repeated phrasing across listings suggests access-controlled, secure parking is a building amenity.

While remarks do not explicitly use the word “tandem,” multiple MLS records flag TANDEM, which is typically tied to the specific deeded stall configuration and less likely to be a generic copy-paste. This suggests at least some units in the building have tandem-style parking stalls.

The building is repeatedly advertised with concierge, security, and guest parking but no listing ever mentions valet or attended parking service. Given both the complete absence of VALET in MLS data and in remarks, it is very likely the building does not offer valet parking.

Searched for 'parking waitlist' and similar phrases. Listings describe assigned/covered stalls and guest parking but do not reference a waitlist system.

Listings emphasize privacy (only three units per floor and separate elevators for certain penthouses) but never reference keyed or fob-access elevators. With no ELEVAT-type security amenity checked in any MLS entry, there is no solid evidence of a dedicated keyed elevator security system as a general building feature. Any potential restricted access appears limited and is not marketed as a building amenity.

Remarks repeatedly note security (e.g., '24-hour security', 'well-managed with 24-hour security', 'secured parking garage') but never mention key card, fob, card reader, or electronic access control. Based on the requirement to rely only on explicit public-remark evidence for this feature, card/fob access cannot be confirmed and is treated as not present.

High-confidence evidence: historical MLS indicates 18 of 20 listings list SECGUA, and many current remarks explicitly state '24-hour security', '24-hr security', or '24/7 security' (e.g., 'the beautiful lobby is staffed...and 24-hour security', 'building...with 24/7 security'). Mentions appear across multiple agents' remarks and consistently confirm staffed/on-site security.

Listings consistently highlight strong security (e.g., '24-hour security', 'vigilant 24-hour security') but do not describe a patrolling or roving security service. In the absence of explicit references to patrols in the remarks and no prior data, this feature is assumed not present.

Despite very detailed amenity descriptions (security, pools, gym, concierge, etc.), none of the listings mention security cameras, CCTV, or video monitoring. With SECSYS unchecked in all 20 MLS records, the weight of evidence indicates video security is not a defined building amenity for residents. This is treated as absent at the building-amenity level.

High-confidence evidence that the building has central air. MLS checkbox data is consistent (18/20 unit_features; 20/20 inclusions) and at least 8 listings' remarks explicitly mention "central AC", "central air", "3 central air/3 A/C units", "3-zones of central AC" or "new zoned AC systems", indicating building-wide central HVAC rather than isolated window units. Mentions appear across multiple agent listings and align with the strong historical reporting, so include central_ac = true.

Across all 20 listings, there are no references to split, ductless, or mini‑split AC, and the MLS never flags split AC. Remarks that discuss cooling consistently describe multi‑zone central AC rather than individual split systems, so this building should not be considered to offer split AC as a feature.

None of the many listings reference window or wall AC, and the MLS never marks window units for this building. Given the strong evidence of central AC throughout and the building’s luxury profile, it is very unlikely that window AC is a building feature available to residents.

Strong building-level evidence that Waikiki Landmark is concrete: 16/20 current MLS records list concrete construction and historical assessments were High confidence. Public remarks across listings do not explicitly state construction type but also offer no contradictory info; the consistency across multiple agents supports including this feature.

Majority-checked double-wall construction: 13/20 recent MLS records indicate double-wall and prior evaluations were High confidence. Remarks across many listings (numerous agents) do not explicitly describe construction details or note changes, but the consistent MLS selections and historical consensus support retaining this feature.

Hollow-tile construction is absent from all MLS entries and never referenced in the remarks. Given the tower’s size and typical engineering in Waikiki, hollow-tile construction is very unlikely to be a primary building method here.

Masonry/stucco construction is checked in 3 out of 20 MLS entries, and the building’s style and era make a stucco-type exterior over masonry/concrete likely. No remarks contradict this, so masonry/stucco construction is reasonably inferred.

Only a subset of MLS records (4 of 20) mark steel-frame construction, but this pattern has persisted across multiple listing batches and agents. Remarks consistently portray a tall, architecturally complex twin-tower high-rise, which is consistent with a concrete structure incorporating steel framing, and there are no comments indicating the absence of steel construction. Given this recurring though minority MLS selection and building type, steel-frame is retained as present with moderate confidence rather than being removed as an error.

A few MLS entries recognize slab construction and, given the scale of the twin 38-story towers, a concrete slab or mat foundation is structurally required. Although not marketed in remarks, slab construction is a reasonable inference for this building.

No analysis available

None of the 20 MLS listings check wood-frame construction, and the building is a tall reinforced high-rise where wood framing would not be used structurally. Remarks only mention wood flooring, not wood structure, so wood-frame construction does not apply to this building.

This property is a multi-story high-rise with residential units stacked well above street level, consistent with above-ground construction. A small subset of MLS records mark the feature, and the building form itself strongly supports it despite limited checkbox usage.

Across all listings reviewed, brick construction is never checked in MLS and never mentioned in marketing remarks. Given local building practices and the high-rise design, brick construction can be confidently excluded for this building.

No listings mark single-wall construction and the building is a modern high-rise, where single-wall methods are not used. Both MLS data and basic engineering constraints strongly indicate there is no single-wall construction here.

Several listings explicitly state a 30-day minimum rental policy (e.g., '30 day minimum rental policy', 'minimum rental period is 30 days'), which means short-term rentals (less than 30 days) are not allowed per the public remarks.

Searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', or hotel brand management. None of the listings describe participation in a hotel rental pool, and because STRs under 30 days are not allowed, hotel-pool participation is not applicable.

Looked for phrases like 'mandatory hotel pool' or 'required to participate'. No listings indicate mandatory participation; additionally, STRs under 30 days are not permitted, so mandatory pool participation does not apply.

At least one listing clearly advertises 'Fee-simple ownership,' confirming that fee simple units exist in Waikiki Landmark. No remarks refer to lease rent, lease expiry, or leasehold, so the building is documented as offering fee simple ownership (no FS/LH ratio is available because no LH units are described).

Across all collected remarks there are zero references to leasehold, lease rent, or lease expiration, and one listing explicitly promotes 'Fee-simple ownership.' Given how prominently leasehold terms are normally disclosed, this strongly indicates that the building does not offer leasehold units.

Multiple remarks explicitly describe the building as fee-simple, meaning there is no leasehold. Since land_tenure_lh does not apply, there is no lease expiry year to extract.

Searched all public remarks for VA-related phrases (e.g., 'VA approved', 'VA financing'). Nothing in the listings references VA loan approval or acceptance, so VA financing is not indicated in the public remarks.

Multiple remarks explicitly reference comprehensive insurance: e.g., 'Bldg. has 100% hurricane coverage.' and 'The building is fully insured' (or equivalent wording). Per rules, explicit mention supports setting this boolean true with high confidence.

MLS amenity checkboxes show fire sprinklers (FIRSPR) on 15 of 20 current listings, providing strong historical checkbox evidence for a building-wide sprinkler system. None of the public remarks explicitly reference a fire sprinkler or suppression system, so the conclusion relies on the majority of MLS amenity entries rather than explicit agent remarks; evidence is therefore implied rather than directly confirmed in multiple remarks.

I searched the public remarks for terms such as 'fire life safety evaluation', 'FLSE passed', 'passed fire inspection', 'fire safety certified', and 'life safety compliant' and found no references. With no explicit mention and no current value indicating pass, this is recorded as false with medium confidence (absence of mention suggests no public statement of a passed FLSE).

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Over a dozen listings explicitly mention ocean or partial ocean views (phrases include “partial ocean vistas,” “panoramic Ocean,” “sparkling ocean,” and “peek-a-boo ocean”), with confirmations from multiple agents and units on high floors. Evidence is strong and repeated across different listings/agents, indicating the building does offer units with ocean views.

Numerous listings explicitly advertise mountain/Koolau or mauka views (examples: “unobstructed views of the Koolaus,” “majestic Koolau Mountain vistas,” “mountain and canal views”), appearing across many units and agents. This is consistent and strong evidence that the building offers mountain views.

Diamond Head is named in multiple remarks as part of the view corridor (e.g., 'iconic Diamond Head,' 'DH View,' 'views of Diamond Head, Waikiki, Ocean, and Mountains'). These references span different units and directions, showing that select units in the building do enjoy Diamond Head views.

Multiple listings mention sweeping city or downtown views (phrases like “city views,” “cityscape,” and “sweeping city and mountain views”), frequently paired with ocean and mountain descriptions. The recurring, explicit mentions across different unit remarks indicate city views are available in the building.

Agents frequently describe “panoramic Ocean…views,” “breathtaking panoramic views of the Ocean, Diamond Head, Canal, and Mountains,” and similar phrases but never mention extended “coastline,” “shoreline,” or “coastal” vistas. Even the most expansive high-floor views are framed as ocean views only, so coastline views are not a clearly advertised building feature.

Listings describe residents enjoying a 'lushly landscaped garden oasis' and a 'beautifully landscaped garden retreat' in conjunction with building amenities. These phrases imply that at least some units or common areas look out onto landscaped garden spaces, making garden views a real feature of the property.

No listings describe golf course/fairway/greens views; only a location mention (“near ... Golf Course”) appears once without claiming a view. Given the absence of any explicit golf-course-view remarks across all listings and prior checks, there is strong evidence the building does not offer golf-course views.

Multiple listings explicitly reference views of the Ala Wai Canal or canal/harbor (phrases like “Ala Wai Canal,” “canal views,” and “Ala Wai canal, mountain, City & Waikiki views”), appearing across several units. This consistent, explicit wording supports inclusion of marina/canal views for the building.

Several listings explicitly reference sunrise or morning-sun exposure (examples: “sunrise highlighting serene mountain views,” “sweeping sunrise, sunset, city, and mountain views,” “Gorgeous views of sunrise…”), repeated across units and agents. This provides strong evidence the building offers sunrise-facing units.

One recent listing clearly describes 'sweeping sunrise, sunset, city, and mountain views' from a high-floor residence, directly confirming sunset visibility from that stack. Other units are described as 'not exposed to the hot afternoon sun' or on the 'cool side', implying that different sides of the building face the afternoon/sunset direction. This new explicit evidence shows that some units do offer sunset views, so the building should be treated as offering sunset-view options.

Agents describe a wide variety of views (ocean, mountains, Diamond Head, city, canal, gardens) but never mention cemeteries or any similar feature. Given the volume and detail of the marketing remarks, it's very likely that cemetery views are not present or relevant for this building.

Listings describe many view types yet do not mention viewing fireworks from lanais or units. Without explicit statements about fireworks visibility, this feature is marked as not present by default.

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

Numerous listings explicitly mention on-site management: phrases include 'General Manager on-site', 'Residential Specialist' or 'Residential Specialists', and 'concierge services' with multilingual staff and 24-hour security; at least a dozen separate listings reference a dedicated on-site/residential specialist or general manager. Combined with historical MLS RESMAN checkbox presence (about 10/20), this provides strong, corroborating evidence that the building has on-site/resident management.

No analysis available

No analysis available