Waikiki Landmark

MLS property data overwhelmingly lists 1992 as the year built (36 of 37 listings), with one outlier at 1999. In the absence of any remarks contradicting this, 1992 is taken as the construction year.

Remarks state the building 'features two, 38-story towers bridged together at the penthouse levels,' which directly establishes a 38-floor height. Other listings referencing high floors and penthouses align with this count, with no conflicting floor totals mentioned.

A listing explicitly notes the building as 'only 196 residential units,' implying this is the total unit count for the project. No other remarks or data contradict this figure, so it is adopted as the building's unit_total.

The remarks were searched for specific percentages and phrases such as "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," and "highly owner occupied." They include references to owners, investors, summer homes, and rentals, but none establish the building-wide owner-occupancy rate. Per the numeric-field rule, the current value of 52.00 is retained with low confidence because there is no evidence in the remarks to confirm or deny it.

The remarks were searched for explicit counts such as "6 elevators," "six elevators," or "multiple elevators." They mention separate elevators for penthouse access but do not confirm or contradict the current value of 6. Per the numeric-field rule, the current value is retained with low confidence.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

At least 7 of 20 current listings identify central AC in the association-fee data. Multiple independent remarks reference central or association-supplied AC, including "Two central AC outlets provide association supplied cooling" and "3-zones of central AC," making the evidence strong.

Cable inclusion is explicitly documented in 1 listing, which states that the $52 monthly other fee is for basic TV cable. The evidence is supported by the current MLS checkbox appearing in 9 of 20 listings and by the prior high-confidence history.

Thirteen of 20 current listings include OTCOEX or an electricity-related inclusion. The explicit statement that maintenance fees include "every utility ... electricity" supports common-area electricity coverage, although most other remarks rely on recurring MLS inclusion data.

Remarks repeatedly reference fee-simple ownership and condo-style amenities, never co-op terminology or co-op tax obligations. The complete absence of COOTAX in the MLS confirms that cooperative taxes are not part of the maintenance fees.

A detailed, non-boilerplate remark specifically lists electricity as included in the maintenance fees along with water, trash, and sewer. Even though MLS checkboxes do not consistently reflect this, the explicit narrative description provides strong evidence that electricity is included building-wide.

The building appears to be an all-electric high-rise, with no gas ranges or gas infrastructure mentioned in any listing. With no MLS records indicating gas in the HOA, it is very likely that gas is not provided or included in the maintenance fees.

Sixteen of 20 current listings identify hot water as included in association fees, substantially outweighing the 2 listings with WTRHTR. The remarks do not provide a strong contrary explanation, so the established building-level inclusion remains supported.

No supplied listing explicitly says that internet or Wi-Fi is included in the fees. The only support is the INTSER checkbox appearing in 6 of 20 current listings and the prior MLS-based high-confidence history, making this substantially weaker than the cable and central-AC evidence.

Across all remarks, there is no mention of marina facilities, boat slips, or marina-related amenities. Combined with the complete absence of MARINA in the MLS data, this indicates marina fees or access are not part of the association dues.

Eighteen of 20 current listings identify sewer as included in association fees. The explicit phrase "maintenance fees includes EVERY utility including ... sewer" independently confirms the feature across the strong MLS pattern.

Nineteen of 20 current listings identify water as included in association fees. The detailed current remark stating that fees include "every utility ... electricity, water, trash and sewer" directly confirms the inclusion.

BBQ facilities are overwhelmingly corroborated, with remarks citing “BBQ areas,” “gas BBQ's,” “BBQ grills,” “BBQ pavilions,” “barbecue,” and outdoor BBQ/cabana areas. The repeated, detailed references across many listings confirm a shared building amenity rather than isolated unit marketing.

0/20 listings reference any form of bicycle storage, and the amenity descriptions consistently omit bike rooms or racks while highlighting many other facilities. Given the breadth of detail agents provide for this luxury building, the absence of any bike-storage mention strongly indicates that dedicated bike storage is not available.

The building overlooks the canal but is not marketed with dock or marina access. The consistent absence of any 'boat dock' or 'marina' language suggests there is no boat docking amenity for residents.

The car wash is directly confirmed in multiple remarks, including “car wash in the garage,” “parking garage offers ... a car wash,” “convenient car wash in the garage for residents,” and “a car wash.” Although it appears in fewer listings than the gym or BBQ, the specific repeated descriptions strongly support its existence.

I did not find convincing evidence of a true clubhouse amenity in the remarks. The building is repeatedly described with pools, gym, lounge, meeting room, and community/recreation spaces, but not a dedicated clubhouse, so this appears unsupported.

Concierge service is clearly established, appearing in 6 of 20 current MLS listings and in numerous detailed remarks. Repeated phrases such as 'concierge services with multilingual staff,' 'multi-lingual concierge,' and 'concierge level staff' provide strong confirmation across multiple listings.

Listings frequently note that the building is pet-friendly but never reference a dedicated dog park or run. Given the lack of textual evidence and almost no MLS support, the building likely does not offer a formal dog park.

Doorman or lobby-attendant service is supported by 9 of 20 current MLS records and multiple remarks. Key evidence includes an explicit 'doorman' reference plus recurring descriptions of a staffed lobby, 'Residential Specialist,' and dedicated personnel at the lobby entrance.

Exercise facilities are repeatedly confirmed across many listings, including “state-of-the-art fitness center,” “fully equipped fitness facility,” “newly updated fitness center,” “spacious gym,” and “top quality fitness center.” The consistency across numerous agents and detailed amenity descriptions strongly supports a building-level fitness room or gym.

The building offers concierge and 24-hour security, but there is no indication of any limousine, town car, or similar transportation service. The silence on this specific luxury feature suggests it is not available.

Meeting facilities are independently mentioned in numerous listings, including “conference room,” “meeting room,” “beautiful meeting room,” “community room,” and “exclusive community room.” The repeated references across penthouse, mid-floor, and standard-unit listings establish this as a building-level amenity.

Patio/deck space is strongly confirmed across the building: well over 13 listings mention features such as a “private lanai,” “covered lanai,” “broad lanai,” “3 HUGE lanais,” or lanai areas ranging from 144 to 840 sq. ft. Multiple listings also describe shared outdoor amenities including the “outdoor recreation deck,” “pool deck,” BBQ areas, cabanas, and landscaped grounds. The consistency across many units and agents, together with 13/20 current MLS amenity records, indicates this is a legitimate building feature rather than simple checkbox copy-paste.

The building is near outdoor areas where residents can walk or jog, but no remarks indicate a dedicated jogging or fitness path as part of the property. The lack of any such mention strongly suggests this amenity does not exist.

Amenities like a kids pool are mentioned but no outdoor play structure or playground is described. The consistent omission plus zero MLS checkmarks indicate there is no children's playground amenity.

No analysis available

Extensive amenity descriptions cover pools, gym, BBQ, lounges, and meeting rooms, but never any putting green. This makes it very likely that a putting green is not part of the building amenities.

Recreation areas are repeatedly confirmed through phrases such as “expansive Rec Deck,” “outdoor recreation deck,” “wonderful recreation deck,” and “resort-style amenity deck.” These descriptions consistently identify a shared building-level recreation area, not a private unit amenity.

The building offers shared recreation-style indoor spaces, with remarks citing a “party area,” “stylish lounge,” “entertainment area,” “lounge with flat-screen TV,” and “exclusive community room.” Although the exact phrase “recreation room” is less frequent, multiple descriptions confirm equivalent shared recreational and entertainment facilities.

No listing explicitly mentions an in-building restaurant, café, or on-site dining facility. References such as "world-class dining," "gourmet dining," and "restaurants within walking distance" clearly describe surrounding Waikiki amenities, so the isolated 1/20 MLS checkbox should not establish a building restaurant.

The phrase 'deluxe rooftop pool with panoramic ocean and city views' directly indicates rooftop-level amenities. While MLS checkboxes omit ROOFDCK, detailed remarks from at least one agent plus descriptions of elevated pool decks support treating rooftop access/amenities as present.

Agents frequently describe pools, jacuzzies, spas, and gyms, but never a sauna or steam room. Given how often amenities are itemized, this omission strongly indicates that a sauna is not part of the building's offerings.

0/20 recent listings advertise building storage units or lockers, and none check storage-related amenities in the MLS. Remarks repeatedly list extensive amenities (pools, cabanas, gym, meeting room, car wash, concierge, etc.) but never mention common-area storage, suggesting such facilities are not provided or are not a marketed feature.

The remarks were searched for surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, and combined bike-and-surfboard storage. No such facility was described.

Tennis court access is weakly evidenced in the current remarks, but the historical MLS data still shows it in a small number of listings. There are no explicit current mentions of a tennis court or tennis facilities, so this looks more like sparse MLS support than a fully confirmed amenity. I would keep it tentatively, but with much lower confidence than the other shared amenities.

Trash chute availability is represented in 14 of 20 current MLS listings, consistent with the previously high-confidence building record. No supplied public remark explicitly quotes “trash chute” or “garbage chute,” so support is primarily MLS-based rather than independently verified in these remarks.

No analysis available

The remarks focus on the grand lobby, recreation deck, pools, and location at the 'gateway to Waikiki' but never describe the property as gated, fenced, or walled. With just a single MLS instance of a gated/wall/fence amenity against 19 without it and no textual support, the best interpretation is that the building does not have a defined perimeter wall/fence or gated-community setup. The feature is therefore treated as absent.

Whirlpool facilities are very strongly supported by repeated phrases such as “two whirlpool spas,” “heated pools, whirlpools,” “Jacuzzi,” “2 jacuzzies,” “adult spa,” “hot tubs,” and “whirlpool.” These references consistently describe shared recreation-deck amenities available to building residents.

Swimming pools are repeatedly mentioned across many listings, including phrases such as "adult and keiki swimming pools," "three resort-style pools," "multi-level pools," and "expansive Rec Deck featuring a large pool." The evidence is strong across multiple remarks and fully consistent with the 20/20 current MLS amenity selections.

At least five distinct public remarks explicitly mention heated pools, including "heated pools," "Largest residential heated pool with spa," "3 heated pools," and "luxury swimming pools, a heated pool." The explicit remarks from multiple listings, together with HEAPOO selected in 12/20 current MLS records and high historical confidence, provide strong evidence that heated pools remain a building amenity.

The remarks repeatedly describe heated, lap, adult, children's, resort-style, and waterfall pools. No listing states that any pool is saltwater, saline, or salt-based.

In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the building: 20 of 20 current MLS listings include washer/dryer in the inclusions. Multiple remarks from separate listings explicitly mention "in-unit laundry," a "stacked Miele washer & ventless dryer," and a "built in washer and dryer," confirming this is not merely unsupported checkbox or copy-paste data.

Across all provided remarks, there are no mentions of community or shared laundry rooms, coin laundry, or laundry facilities on any floor, despite detailed descriptions of amenities. Instead, multiple listings focus on in-unit washer/dryers, making it unlikely that a separate community laundry is a notable building feature. The lone MLS COMLAU entry is likely an agent mistake rather than evidence of a true shared laundry amenity.

The remarks were searched for coin-operated, card-operated, fee-based, paid, quarter-operated, and similar laundry terms. No paid community laundry was mentioned.

The remarks were searched for laundry on each floor, laundry rooms on every floor, and floor-by-floor laundry. No such community laundry arrangement was described.

Nearly all listings reference at least one parking stall and a shared parking garage, confirming building parking is universally available. Phrases like “two parking stalls included” and “parking garage” appear across multiple independent listings, so this is not a one-off agent error.

Assigned parking is strongly confirmed across the building: at least 12 listings explicitly mention phrases such as "one dedicated parking stall," "two assigned parking stalls," "two dedicated parking stalls," or "2 assigned, covered parking stalls." The evidence comes from multiple distinct remarks and is consistent with the current MLS data.

Covered parking is strongly supported across the building, with explicit references in at least 10 listings and current MLS coverage in 20/20 records. Key remarks include "two separate covered parking stalls," "two assigned covered parking stalls," and "two covered stalls in a secure garage," indicating this is a consistent building offering rather than isolated or copied wording.

Parking is repeatedly described as included with the residences, with several listings specifying assigned or covered stalls. The statement that stalls 'convey' strongly supports ownership or deeded parking.

At least one current listing clearly advertises EV charging in the garage (“parking garage offers EV stations”), which is unlikely to be fabricated given its specificity. The absence of the EVCHRG MLS checkbox appears to be an agent oversight rather than proof the stations don’t exist.

The remarks were searched for parking fees, monthly parking charges, parking rental costs, and additional parking expenses. No parking-specific fee was found, so the monthly amount is unknown.

Guest parking is confirmed by at least 5 current public remarks from different listing descriptions, including "ample guest parking," "guest parking," and "lots of parking for your guests." The evidence aligns with the 10/20 current MLS records and supports including guest parking as a building-level amenity.

Secured parking is strongly supported by multiple explicit remarks, including "secured parking garage" and references to the building's "secure" parking garage, in addition to 24-hour security and controlled residential access. The 13/20 current MLS records and prior high-confidence evidence confirm that parking has secured entry.

While remarks do not explicitly use the word “tandem,” multiple MLS records flag TANDEM, which is typically tied to the specific deeded stall configuration and less likely to be a generic copy-paste. This suggests at least some units in the building have tandem-style parking stalls.

The building is repeatedly advertised with concierge, security, and guest parking but no listing ever mentions valet or attended parking service. Given both the complete absence of VALET in MLS data and in remarks, it is very likely the building does not offer valet parking.

The remarks were searched for parking waitlist references and instructions to join a parking queue. Nothing indicates that the building operates a parking waitlist.

Listings emphasize privacy (only three units per floor and separate elevators for certain penthouses) but never reference keyed or fob-access elevators. With no ELEVAT-type security amenity checked in any MLS entry, there is no solid evidence of a dedicated keyed elevator security system as a general building feature. Any potential restricted access appears limited and is not marketed as a building amenity.

The remarks mention 24-hour security, secured parking, concierge services, doormen, and residential specialists. They do not mention key-card access, fob access, card readers, or electronic entry.

At least 20 current listing remarks mention building security, repeatedly using phrases such as "24-hour security," "24/7 security," and "on-site 24/7 security." The evidence is widespread across multiple listings and agents and is consistent with the 19/20 current MLS amenity records, although some wording appears standardized or copy-pasted.

The remarks consistently mention 24-hour security and security personnel or services. They do not specifically describe security patrols, roving security, or a patrol service.

Despite very detailed amenity descriptions (security, pools, gym, concierge, etc.), none of the listings mention security cameras, CCTV, or video monitoring. With SECSYS unchecked in all 20 MLS records, the weight of evidence indicates video security is not a defined building amenity for residents. This is treated as absent at the building-amenity level.

Central air conditioning is strongly and repeatedly supported across the building, with at least 9 current remarks explicitly mentioning central, zoned, or association-supplied AC. The evidence comes from multiple distinct listings and includes detailed descriptions such as '3 central air conditioning units to individually control the temperature' and '3-zones of central AC,' confirming this is not merely copied checkbox data.

Across all 20 listings, there are no references to split, ductless, or mini‑split AC, and the MLS never flags split AC. Remarks that discuss cooling consistently describe multi‑zone central AC rather than individual split systems, so this building should not be considered to offer split AC as a feature.

None of the many listings reference window or wall AC, and the MLS never marks window units for this building. Given the strong evidence of central AC throughout and the building’s luxury profile, it is very unlikely that window AC is a building feature available to residents.

Concrete construction is indicated in 17 of 20 current MLS listings through the CONCRE designation. No public remarks explicitly say "concrete construction" or "reinforced concrete," but the evidence is strong across the building's listings and consistent with the prior high-confidence assessment.

Double-wall construction is indicated in 13 of 20 current MLS listings through the DOUWAL designation. No public remarks explicitly use "double wall," "double-wall construction," or "two walls," but the feature has strong repeated MLS support and aligns with the prior high-confidence assessment.

Hollow-tile construction is absent from all MLS entries and never referenced in the remarks. Given the tower’s size and typical engineering in Waikiki, hollow-tile construction is very unlikely to be a primary building method here.

Masonry/stucco construction is checked in 3 out of 20 MLS entries, and the building’s style and era make a stucco-type exterior over masonry/concrete likely. No remarks contradict this, so masonry/stucco construction is reasonably inferred.

Only 5 of 20 current listings identify STEFRA construction materials, and 0 public remarks mention "steel frame" or "steel frame construction." The limited, checkbox-only evidence and prior low confidence suggest this feature should be omitted unless independently verified.

Concrete slab construction appears in just 2 of 20 current MLS records, with no supporting remarks. The limited checkbox evidence does not establish slab construction reliably for the building.

0 of 20 listings explicitly mention stone construction or a stone exterior. Several listings mention interior stone-related finishes, including 'natural stone marble flooring' and 'marble/stone flooring,' but these do not validate the building's construction; the lone MLS checkbox appears likely to be copy-paste or misclassified material data.

None of the 20 MLS listings check wood-frame construction, and the building is a tall reinforced high-rise where wood framing would not be used structurally. Remarks only mention wood flooring, not wood structure, so wood-frame construction does not apply to this building.

Above-ground construction has only a weak MLS signal, with just 3 of 20 listings showing ABOGRO. The current public remarks are extensive but never explicitly mention above-ground construction; they instead describe a standard tower/high-rise building, so this appears unsupported in the current record and likely reflects a prior MLS inconsistency.

Across all listings reviewed, brick construction is never checked in MLS and never mentioned in marketing remarks. Given local building practices and the high-rise design, brick construction can be confidently excluded for this building.

No listings mark single-wall construction and the building is a modern high-rise, where single-wall methods are not used. Both MLS data and basic engineering constraints strongly indicate there is no single-wall construction here.

The remarks consistently describe a 30-day minimum rental requirement. Under the specified rules, this is evidence against short-term rental eligibility, despite references to investors, vacation homes, and rental programs.

The remarks were searched for hotel rental pools, hotel management, branded rental programs, and similar arrangements. No such program is identified, and this feature must be false because STR is not allowed.

The remarks contain no language requiring all owners to participate in a hotel rental program or prohibiting opt-out. Because the building has a 30-day minimum rental policy and STR is not allowed, mandatory hotel-pool participation is false.

At least one listing clearly advertises 'Fee-simple ownership,' confirming that fee simple units exist in Waikiki Landmark. No remarks refer to lease rent, lease expiry, or leasehold, so the building is documented as offering fee simple ownership (no FS/LH ratio is available because no LH units are described).

Across all collected remarks there are zero references to leasehold, lease rent, or lease expiration, and one listing explicitly promotes 'Fee-simple ownership.' Given how prominently leasehold terms are normally disclosed, this strongly indicates that the building does not offer leasehold units.

The remarks were searched for leasehold ownership, ground leases, lease expiration, renewal, and four-digit expiry years. No lease expiry year is mentioned, and the explicit fee-simple reference indicates no applicable leasehold expiry.

The remarks were searched for explicit VA approval, VA financing, and VA loans accepted language. Although a listing offers a VA loan assumption, there is no evidence that the building itself is VA loan approved.

Several listings provide direct evidence of comprehensive building insurance. Additional remarks state the building has "100% hurricane coverage," supporting strong insurance coverage, although hurricane coverage alone would not establish walls-in coverage. The repeated explicit statements that the property is fully or 100% insured support a high-confidence true value.

Fire sprinklers are supported by 16 of 20 current MLS listings, and one remark explicitly confirms that the "Building & apt have fire sprinklers." The strong MLS pattern plus direct building-level confirmation indicates this is a genuine building feature rather than an isolated copy-paste error.

The remarks mention that the building and apartments have fire sprinklers and that one listing states there are fire extinguishers in all units. These are related safety features but do not establish that an FLSE was passed, that the building is fire-safety certified, or that it passed a fire inspection. No explicit denial was found; under the rule for an unverified boolean with no current value, the value is false with medium-low confidence.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Ocean views are documented in 8/20 current MLS listings and are repeatedly supported by independent remarks across multiple units and stacks. Key descriptions include “sweeping views of the Pacific Ocean,” “partial ocean vistas,” “panoramic Ocean” views, and ocean sightlines from private lanais, confirming that the building offers ocean-view residences.

Mountain views appear in 11/20 current MLS listings, with strong corroboration across numerous remarks rather than a single copied description. Examples include “sweeping city and mountain views,” “stunning mountain views,” “unobstructed gorgeous mountain” views, and “Koolau Mountain vistas,” establishing that mountain-view units are available in the building.

Diamond Head views are confirmed by multiple listings and are repeatedly paired with ocean/city/mountain views. The language is explicit—such as 'DH view' and 'iconic Diamond Head'—which makes this high-confidence for building search purposes.

City views are strongly established: 16/20 current MLS listings include CITY in their view descriptions, with 0/20 marked NONE. Numerous independent remarks explicitly reference city views, city lights, city skyline, or panoramic city views, indicating this is a consistent building offering rather than a single copied description.

Coastline views are not well supported in the remarks. While many listings mention ocean and canal views, none of the current remarks explicitly say 'coastline,' 'shoreline,' or 'coastal view,' and historical support is limited to only 3 of 20 listings. This looks like a weak MLS tag rather than a reliably documented building feature.

Listings describe residents enjoying a 'lushly landscaped garden oasis' and a 'beautifully landscaped garden retreat' in conjunction with building amenities. These phrases imply that at least some units or common areas look out onto landscaped garden spaces, making garden views a real feature of the property.

Golf-course evidence is substantially weaker than for the other views. One remark references being “conveniently located near ... Golf Course,” which indicates proximity, not necessarily a view, while the current MLS count shows 4 listings with golf-course text; the feature should therefore be retained cautiously due to the prior High-confidence designation.

Marina-related views are strongly supported, with 11/20 current MLS records reporting them. Numerous listings explicitly mention the Ala Wai Canal, canal views, or paddlers on the canal, often together with mountain, city, and ocean views; this is consistent evidence that the building offers marina/canal-view residences.

Sunrise exposure is directly supported by several current listings. Roughly 10 of 20 listings mention sunrise or morning light, including phrases like 'sweeping sunrise' and 'sunrise highlighting serene mountain views.' The feature appears consistently enough to include with high confidence.

Sunset views are directly described in remarks such as “sweeping sunrise, sunset,” “unwinding at sunset,” and “unforgettable Hawaiian sunsets.” These mentions occur in multiple high-floor and corner residences, supporting sunset-view availability within the building.

Agents describe a wide variety of views (ocean, mountains, Diamond Head, city, canal, gardens) but never mention cemeteries or any similar feature. Given the volume and detail of the marketing remarks, it's very likely that cemetery views are not present or relevant for this building.

The remarks explicitly state that fireworks can be viewed from the units' lanais and identify Friday night fireworks. This directly satisfies the requirement for a fireworks view from the building.

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

Resident management is supported by 14 of 20 current MLS listings and multiple remarks from different listings describing a "General Manager on-site," "dedicated General Manager," and "responsive building manager." The repeated on-site management descriptions across agents strongly confirm the feature, although some listings use the related term Residential Specialist.

No analysis available

No analysis available