Waikiki Landmark

MLS property data overwhelmingly lists 1992 as the year built (36 of 37 listings), with one outlier at 1999. In the absence of any remarks contradicting this, 1992 is taken as the construction year.

Remarks state the building 'features two, 38-story towers bridged together at the penthouse levels,' which directly establishes a 38-floor height. Other listings referencing high floors and penthouses align with this count, with no conflicting floor totals mentioned.

A listing explicitly notes the building as 'only 196 residential units,' implying this is the total unit count for the project. No other remarks or data contradict this figure, so it is adopted as the building's unit_total.

Public remarks were searched for phrases like 'owner occupied', 'percent owner occupied', or similar but none were found. Per the rules, the current value of 52.00 is retained but assigned low confidence due to lack of corroborating remarks.

Public remarks mention 'separate elevators' and privacy with elevator access, confirming elevators are present, but no listing states a numeric count. Per rules, kept the existing numeric value of 6 with low-to-moderate confidence due to lack of explicit number in remarks.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

12 of 20 MLS records show central AC (ACCEN) and numerous remarks explicitly reference "central AC" or "zoned AC systems" (e.g., "3-zones of central AC", "New zoned AC systems"), indicating strong and consistent evidence across listings and agents.

7 of 20 current MLS listings flag cable (CABTV) and an agent remark explicitly notes "Other fee of $52/mo. is for basic TV cable." Cable inclusion appears in multiple listings but is not universal across agents, so the evidence is moderate rather than definitive.

MLS checkbox OTCOEX appears in 12 of 20 current listings and public remarks explicitly state maintenance includes common/building electricity (e.g., "maintenance fees includes EVERY utility including... electricity"). Evidence is strong and consistent across multiple listings and agents, indicating common-area electricity is included in the association fee.

Remarks repeatedly reference fee-simple ownership and condo-style amenities, never co-op terminology or co-op tax obligations. The complete absence of COOTAX in the MLS confirms that cooperative taxes are not part of the maintenance fees.

A detailed, non-boilerplate remark specifically lists electricity as included in the maintenance fees along with water, trash, and sewer. Even though MLS checkboxes do not consistently reflect this, the explicit narrative description provides strong evidence that electricity is included building-wide.

The building appears to be an all-electric high-rise, with no gas ranges or gas infrastructure mentioned in any listing. With no MLS records indicating gas in the HOA, it is very likely that gas is not provided or included in the maintenance fees.

15 of 20 current MLS records flag HOTWAT included, providing consistent checkbox evidence though public remarks rarely call it out. One listing shows a water heater (WTRHTR) which could indicate unit-level hot water in a minority of cases, so evidence for building-supplied hot water is moderate rather than definitive.

6 of 20 listings flag internet service, but public remarks and marketing consistently list included utilities ("electricity, water, trash and sewer") while omitting internet/Wi‑Fi. Multiple agents' remarks and the low MLS checkbox prevalence indicate internet is not reliably included in the maintenance fee.

Across all remarks, there is no mention of marina facilities, boat slips, or marina-related amenities. Combined with the complete absence of MARINA in the MLS data, this indicates marina fees or access are not part of the association dues.

19 of 20 MLS listings flag sewer included and several public remarks explicitly state maintenance fees include sewer (e.g., "maintenance fees includes EVERY utility including... sewer"). The evidence is strong and consistent across listings and agents.

19 of 20 MLS listings indicate water is included and public remarks explicitly mention maintenance includes water ("electricity, water, trash and sewer"). This is strong, consistent evidence across multiple listings that water is included in the association fee.

Strong evidence: 19/20 MLS records include BBQ and multiple public remarks repeatedly mention BBQ/grills and cabana BBQ areas (e.g., 'BBQ areas', 'gas BBQs', 'BBQ/entertainment areas'). The feature is widely and consistently represented across listings.

0/20 listings reference any form of bicycle storage, and the amenity descriptions consistently omit bike rooms or racks while highlighting many other facilities. Given the breadth of detail agents provide for this luxury building, the absence of any bike-storage mention strongly indicates that dedicated bike storage is not available.

The building overlooks the canal but is not marketed with dock or marina access. The consistent absence of any 'boat dock' or 'marina' language suggests there is no boat docking amenity for residents.

Good evidence: 17/20 MLS records list car wash and multiple public remarks explicitly mention 'car wash in the garage' or 'convenient car wash', indicating the building provides resident car wash facilities.

Agents describe many amenities (rec deck, pools, gym, meeting room, community room, concierge) but do not mention any dedicated clubhouse. The few MLS checkmarks likely reflect mis-clicks rather than a true clubhouse facility.

Several listings clearly advertise 'concierge services with multilingual staff' and 'multi-lingual concierge', distinguishing this from basic security. These phrases appear across different units and agents, indicating a consistent, building-wide concierge offering. The CONCIE amenity being checked in 6 of 20 MLS records aligns with and reinforces the remarks evidence.

Listings frequently note that the building is pet-friendly but never reference a dedicated dog park or run. Given the lack of textual evidence and almost no MLS support, the building likely does not offer a formal dog park.

Evidence indicates a staffed lobby/attendant presence: many listings describe 'concierge services', 'Residential Specialist available', 'multilingual staff', and 'Residential Specialist at the front entry.' While only ~7/20 current MLS records show the DOORMA checkbox, more than a dozen remarks across different agents describe front-lobby staffing, supporting inclusion of a doorman/lobby-attendant feature at high confidence.

Strong evidence: 19/20 MLS records list an exercise room and numerous public remarks explicitly reference a gym or fitness center (phrases include 'newly updated fitness center', 'state-of-the-art fitness center', 'spacious gym'). Evidence is consistent across many agent listings and matches historical MLS checkbox data, so confidence is very high.

The building offers concierge and 24-hour security, but there is no indication of any limousine, town car, or similar transportation service. The silence on this specific luxury feature suggests it is not available.

Strong evidence: 17/20 MLS records list a meeting/conference room and many remarks state 'meeting room', 'conference room', or 'conference room & more', consistently included by multiple agents, supporting high confidence.

Evidence is strong: current MLS checkbox data lists PATDEC/COVPAT on 13/20 listings and many public remarks explicitly mention lanais/balconies and shared outdoor decks. Representative phrases include "private lanai", "expansive Rec Deck", and "outdoor recreation deck with three resort-style pools"—the feature is consistently described across multiple agent listings rather than appearing as a single copy/paste anomaly.

The building is near outdoor areas where residents can walk or jog, but no remarks indicate a dedicated jogging or fitness path as part of the property. The lack of any such mention strongly suggests this amenity does not exist.

Amenities like a kids pool are mentioned but no outdoor play structure or playground is described. The consistent omission plus zero MLS checkmarks indicate there is no children's playground amenity.

No analysis available

Extensive amenity descriptions cover pools, gym, BBQ, lounges, and meeting rooms, but never any putting green. This makes it very likely that a putting green is not part of the building amenities.

Moderately strong evidence: while MLS checkbox shows 6/20, numerous remarks highlight an 'expansive rec deck' or 'outdoor recreation deck' with pools, cabanas, kitchenette and entertainment areas (phrases include 'expansive Rec Deck', 'outdoor recreation deck', 'recreation area'). Several agents independently reference the shared recreation deck, so confidence is solid.

Remarks frequently mention an expansive 'Rec Deck' plus indoor/outdoor social spaces such as a 'stylish lounge with seating and TV,' 'lounge with kitchenette,' 'entertainment area with a flat-screen TV,' 'recreation area,' 'conference room,' and 'exclusive community room.' These spaces fit the definition of shared recreation/entertainment rooms available to residents. With explicit references in multiple listings and MLS amenities often marking RECROO, a building recreation room/area is strongly supported.

Remarks emphasize nearby 'gourmet dining' and 'gourmet level restaurants' but clearly position them as neighborhood amenities, not part of the building. With no explicit reference to an in-building restaurant, this amenity should be considered absent.

The phrase 'deluxe rooftop pool with panoramic ocean and city views' directly indicates rooftop-level amenities. While MLS checkboxes omit ROOFDCK, detailed remarks from at least one agent plus descriptions of elevated pool decks support treating rooftop access/amenities as present.

Agents frequently describe pools, jacuzzies, spas, and gyms, but never a sauna or steam room. Given how often amenities are itemized, this omission strongly indicates that a sauna is not part of the building's offerings.

0/20 recent listings advertise building storage units or lockers, and none check storage-related amenities in the MLS. Remarks repeatedly list extensive amenities (pools, cabanas, gym, meeting room, car wash, concierge, etc.) but never mention common-area storage, suggesting such facilities are not provided or are not a marketed feature.

The public remarks list many amenities (multiple pools, gym, BBQ areas, cabanas, car wash, meeting rooms, security, etc.) but never mention any type of surfboard or board storage. I specifically searched for phrases like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', and 'bike and surfboard storage' and found none, so it is likely this building does not offer dedicated surfboard storage.

Across all provided remarks, amenities such as multiple pools, spas, gym, BBQ areas, lounges, and meeting rooms are described in detail, but tennis courts are never referenced. The near-total absence of tennis in both historical and current narrative descriptions, combined with just 1/20 MLS records checking the tennis box, indicates the building does not offer tennis court facilities. This appears to be a case of occasional MLS miscoding rather than a missing or new feature.

Mixed evidence: MLS checkbox data lists trash chute in 18/20 records, but public remarks in this dataset do not explicitly mention a trash/garbage chute. Given the MLS prevalence and no agent corrections or explicit contradictory remarks, the feature is kept true but with moderate confidence pending explicit confirmation.

No analysis available

The remarks focus on the grand lobby, recreation deck, pools, and location at the 'gateway to Waikiki' but never describe the property as gated, fenced, or walled. With just a single MLS instance of a gated/wall/fence amenity against 19 without it and no textual support, the best interpretation is that the building does not have a defined perimeter wall/fence or gated-community setup. The feature is therefore treated as absent.

Strong evidence: 15/20 MLS records list whirlpool features and numerous remarks mention 'Jacuzzi', '2 whirlpool spas', 'hot tubs' or similar phrasing across agent listings, indicating multiple spa/whirlpool amenities on the recreation/pool deck.

Strong evidence: 20/20 current MLS listings include pool amenities and the public remarks repeatedly reference pools (e.g., 'three resort-style pools', 'large pool', 'sparkling pool', 'pool deck'). Mentions come from multiple agent remarks across listings and consistently describe shared, multi-level/resort-style pools available to residents.

Moderately strong evidence: 14/20 MLS records include the heated-pool flag and several agent remarks explicitly mention heated pools (quotes include 'Largest residential heated pool', '3 heated pools', and '3 heated pools, BBQ areas'). The heated status is confirmed across multiple listings and agent descriptions, indicating the building's pools are heated.

All provided public remarks were searched for any indication that the swimming pools are salt water (terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater', 'saline', or 'salt pool'). None of the many detailed descriptions of the amenity deck and multiple pools referenced salt water systems, so the pool is assumed not to be salt water based on available remarks. This could be updated if future listings explicitly describe the pool as salt water.

Strong evidence that some units in the Waikiki Landmark have in-unit laundry: historical MLS data recorded washer/dryer in 19 of 20 listings, and multiple current remarks explicitly mention "stacked Miele washer & ventless dryer", "in-unit laundry", "built in washer and dryer", and "new washer/dryer". The confirmations come from multiple listings/agents and align with the historical checkbox data, indicating the building offers units with in-unit laundry.

Across all provided remarks, there are no mentions of community or shared laundry rooms, coin laundry, or laundry facilities on any floor, despite detailed descriptions of amenities. Instead, multiple listings focus on in-unit washer/dryers, making it unlikely that a separate community laundry is a notable building feature. The lone MLS COMLAU entry is likely an agent mistake rather than evidence of a true shared laundry amenity.

I looked for terms such as 'coin-op', 'coin laundry', 'card-operated laundry', 'paid laundry', and 'laundry fee' and found no matches. Given the focus on in-unit laundry and the lack of any mention of paid common laundry, it's likely there is no notable paid community laundry facility.

I searched the public remarks for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and 'community laundry' and found none. Multiple listings instead highlight in-unit washer/dryer and other amenities, suggesting there is no notable floor-by-floor community laundry setup.

Nearly all listings reference at least one parking stall and a shared parking garage, confirming building parking is universally available. Phrases like “two parking stalls included” and “parking garage” appear across multiple independent listings, so this is not a one-off agent error.

Strong evidence across listings: 19 of 20 MLS records list assigned parking and many remarks explicitly state 'two assigned parking stalls' or 'two assigned, covered parking stalls.' Mentions appear in multiple agent remarks (not isolated), indicating the building offers assigned/reserved parking stalls.

Clear, consistent evidence: all 20 MLS records include covered/garage parking and many remarks state phrases like 'two covered stalls', 'covered parking stalls', and 'parking garage offers EV stations and a car wash.' Coverage is corroborated across many agent remarks.

I searched for explicit language like 'deeded parking' or 'parking included in deed' but found only references to 'assigned' or 'included' parking stalls (e.g., 'Two parking stalls included', 'two assigned covered parking stalls'). Without an explicit 'deeded' statement in the public remarks, cannot conclude parking is deeded.

At least one current listing clearly advertises EV charging in the garage (“parking garage offers EV stations”), which is unlikely to be fabricated given its specificity. The absence of the EVCHRG MLS checkbox appears to be an agent oversight rather than proof the stations don’t exist.

Searched for terms like 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', or numeric parking amounts. Remarks describe included/assigned stalls and guest parking but do not list a parking fee, so monthly parking fee is unknown from remarks.

Moderately strong evidence: 13 of 20 MLS records include guest parking and several remarks explicitly mention 'guest parking', 'guest parking and 24/7 security', or 'plenty of parking for your guests.' The amenity is consistently listed across many agent remarks, indicating guest parking is available in the building.

Good evidence of secured-entry parking: 13 of 20 MLS records list secured-entry parking and multiple public remarks explicitly reference a 'secured/secure parking garage' or 'secured parking garage' and 24-hour security. The consistency across several agent remarks supports inclusion of secured-entry parking for the building.

While remarks do not explicitly use the word “tandem,” multiple MLS records flag TANDEM, which is typically tied to the specific deeded stall configuration and less likely to be a generic copy-paste. This suggests at least some units in the building have tandem-style parking stalls.

The building is repeatedly advertised with concierge, security, and guest parking but no listing ever mentions valet or attended parking service. Given both the complete absence of VALET in MLS data and in remarks, it is very likely the building does not offer valet parking.

I searched for phrases such as 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list', or instructions to join a waitlist. Listings reference assigned stalls and guest parking but do not mention any waitlist system.

Listings emphasize privacy (only three units per floor and separate elevators for certain penthouses) but never reference keyed or fob-access elevators. With no ELEVAT-type security amenity checked in any MLS entry, there is no solid evidence of a dedicated keyed elevator security system as a general building feature. Any potential restricted access appears limited and is not marketed as a building amenity.

Remarks repeatedly note security (e.g., '24-hour security', 'well-managed with 24-hour security', 'secured parking garage') but never mention key card, fob, card reader, or electronic access control. Based on the requirement to rely only on explicit public-remark evidence for this feature, card/fob access cannot be confirmed and is treated as not present.

Strong evidence across listings that the building provides security guard service: 17 of 20 current MLS records list SECGUA and numerous remarks explicitly state '24-hour security', '24-hr security' or 'on-site 24/7 security'. Multiple agents independently reference this feature (not isolated to a single listing), supporting a high-confidence conclusion that building security service exists.

Listings consistently highlight strong security (e.g., '24-hour security', 'vigilant 24-hour security') but do not describe a patrolling or roving security service. In the absence of explicit references to patrols in the remarks and no prior data, this feature is assumed not present.

Despite very detailed amenity descriptions (security, pools, gym, concierge, etc.), none of the listings mention security cameras, CCTV, or video monitoring. With SECSYS unchecked in all 20 MLS records, the weight of evidence indicates video security is not a defined building amenity for residents. This is treated as absent at the building-amenity level.

MLS checkbox data is strongly consistent (18 of 20 unit_feature entries and all 20 listings include ACCEN). Multiple current remarks explicitly mention central AC or zoned/3-zone central systems (examples: 'complete with central AC for year-round comfort', '3 central air conditioning units', '3-zones of central AC', 'Central AC'), indicating building-wide central air is available. Evidence is strong across many agent remarks and aligns with the historical MLS flags.

Across all 20 listings, there are no references to split, ductless, or mini‑split AC, and the MLS never flags split AC. Remarks that discuss cooling consistently describe multi‑zone central AC rather than individual split systems, so this building should not be considered to offer split AC as a feature.

None of the many listings reference window or wall AC, and the MLS never marks window units for this building. Given the strong evidence of central AC throughout and the building’s luxury profile, it is very unlikely that window AC is a building feature available to residents.

Historic MLS checkbox data shows 16/20 listings list CONCRE (strong building-level evidence). None of the current public remarks explicitly mention construction materials or a structural change, and there is no contradictory information indicating the building is not concrete. Given the prior High confidence and lack of contrary remarks, construction_concrete is retained as true with high confidence.

Majority-checked double-wall construction: 13/20 recent MLS records indicate double-wall and prior evaluations were High confidence. Remarks across many listings (numerous agents) do not explicitly describe construction details or note changes, but the consistent MLS selections and historical consensus support retaining this feature.

Hollow-tile construction is absent from all MLS entries and never referenced in the remarks. Given the tower’s size and typical engineering in Waikiki, hollow-tile construction is very unlikely to be a primary building method here.

Masonry/stucco construction is checked in 3 out of 20 MLS entries, and the building’s style and era make a stucco-type exterior over masonry/concrete likely. No remarks contradict this, so masonry/stucco construction is reasonably inferred.

Only a subset of MLS records (4 of 20) mark steel-frame construction, but this pattern has persisted across multiple listing batches and agents. Remarks consistently portray a tall, architecturally complex twin-tower high-rise, which is consistent with a concrete structure incorporating steel framing, and there are no comments indicating the absence of steel construction. Given this recurring though minority MLS selection and building type, steel-frame is retained as present with moderate confidence rather than being removed as an error.

A few MLS entries recognize slab construction and, given the scale of the twin 38-story towers, a concrete slab or mat foundation is structurally required. Although not marketed in remarks, slab construction is a reasonable inference for this building.

No analysis available

None of the 20 MLS listings check wood-frame construction, and the building is a tall reinforced high-rise where wood framing would not be used structurally. Remarks only mention wood flooring, not wood structure, so wood-frame construction does not apply to this building.

Moderate historical signal: 3 of 20 MLS records list ABOGRO and prior confidence was Medium. Public remarks describe a multi‑story high‑rise/tower (units on 17th, 32nd, 35th floors etc.), implying above‑ground units but do not explicitly state 'above ground construction' or 'above ground materials'. Evidence is limited and appears inconsistent across agents (possible copy‑paste), so overall confidence is low.

Across all listings reviewed, brick construction is never checked in MLS and never mentioned in marketing remarks. Given local building practices and the high-rise design, brick construction can be confidently excluded for this building.

No listings mark single-wall construction and the building is a modern high-rise, where single-wall methods are not used. Both MLS data and basic engineering constraints strongly indicate there is no single-wall construction here.

Numerous listings explicitly state the building 'allows minimum 30-day rental' or '30 day minimum rental policy' (e.g., 'This building allows minimum 30 day rental as per house rules'), which indicates short-term (transient nightly) rentals are not permitted while 30+ day rentals are allowed — therefore STR (as commonly defined by nightly stays) is not allowed, but longer-term rentals (30-day minimum) are permitted. Per the feature definition, STR here is marked allowed (building permits rentals per house rules) with high confidence.

Searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', and references to hotel-managed rental pools. None of the public remarks indicate the building participates in a hotel rental pool program, so this is false.

Reviewed remarks for phrases indicating required participation in a hotel/rental pool. Several listings describe individual units being enrolled or professionally managed, implying optional participation; no listings state a mandatory hotel-pool requirement, so mandatory participation is false.

At least one listing clearly advertises 'Fee-simple ownership,' confirming that fee simple units exist in Waikiki Landmark. No remarks refer to lease rent, lease expiry, or leasehold, so the building is documented as offering fee simple ownership (no FS/LH ratio is available because no LH units are described).

Across all collected remarks there are zero references to leasehold, lease rent, or lease expiration, and one listing explicitly promotes 'Fee-simple ownership.' Given how prominently leasehold terms are normally disclosed, this strongly indicates that the building does not offer leasehold units.

Multiple listings explicitly describe the property as fee-simple/fee-simple ownership, indicating this is not a leasehold property. Therefore a lease expiry year is not applicable and returned as null.

Searched all public remarks for phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', and 'VA loans accepted'. No listings reference VA loan approval or VA financing, so cannot mark the building as VA-approved from the remarks alone.

Several public remarks explicitly indicate comprehensive/walls-in insurance and 100% hurricane coverage for the building. This explicit language supports a high-confidence true value for fully insured.

MLS amenity checkboxes indicate fire sprinklers on 15 of 20 current listings, providing medium-strength checkbox evidence. None of the public remarks explicitly mention 'fire sprinkler', 'sprinkler system', or 'fire suppression' (remarks reference fire extinguishers instead), so the feature is included based on consistent MLS checkbox entries but lacks corroborating language in agent remarks.

Searched all public remarks for terms like 'fire life safety evaluation', 'FLSE passed', 'passed fire inspection', 'fire safety certified', and related phrasing; none were found. With no explicit mentions, set to false per guidance (absence = likely doesn't exist) with medium confidence.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Multiple public remarks explicitly reference ocean views across unit listings—examples include phrases like 'partial ocean vistas,' 'panoramic Ocean,' 'glimpse of the ocean,' and 'sparkling ocean.' Historical data indicated over a dozen listings mentioning ocean views and current remarks continue to describe ocean-facing sightlines, so evidence is strong and consistent across multiple agents/units.

Numerous listings explicitly advertise mountain/Koolau or mauka views (examples: “unobstructed views of the Koolaus,” “majestic Koolau Mountain vistas,” “mountain and canal views”), appearing across many units and agents. This is consistent and strong evidence that the building offers mountain views.

Diamond Head is named in multiple remarks as part of the view corridor (e.g., 'iconic Diamond Head,' 'DH View,' 'views of Diamond Head, Waikiki, Ocean, and Mountains'). These references span different units and directions, showing that select units in the building do enjoy Diamond Head views.

Numerous public remarks mention city or sweeping city views (phrases include 'sweeping city,' 'cityscape,' 'city views,' and 'stunning city views from every room'), confirming historical high-confidence data. Multiple listings and agents describe city-facing units, so the building offers city views for buyers.

Agents frequently describe “panoramic Ocean…views,” “breathtaking panoramic views of the Ocean, Diamond Head, Canal, and Mountains,” and similar phrases but never mention extended “coastline,” “shoreline,” or “coastal” vistas. Even the most expansive high-floor views are framed as ocean views only, so coastline views are not a clearly advertised building feature.

Listings describe residents enjoying a 'lushly landscaped garden oasis' and a 'beautifully landscaped garden retreat' in conjunction with building amenities. These phrases imply that at least some units or common areas look out onto landscaped garden spaces, making garden views a real feature of the property.

No listings describe golf course/fairway/greens views; only a location mention (“near ... Golf Course”) appears once without claiming a view. Given the absence of any explicit golf-course-view remarks across all listings and prior checks, there is strong evidence the building does not offer golf-course views.

Several public remarks explicitly reference the Ala Wai Canal/canal views (phrases include 'Ala Wai Canal,' 'canal views,' and 'overlooking the scenic Ala Wai Canal'), and historical summaries showed multiple listings mentioning the canal/harbor. Evidence is consistent across listings and supports inclusion of marina/harbor/canal views for the building.

Several listings explicitly reference sunrise or morning-sun exposure (examples: “sunrise highlighting serene mountain views,” “sweeping sunrise, sunset, city, and mountain views,” “Gorgeous views of sunrise…”), repeated across units and agents. This provides strong evidence the building offers sunrise-facing units.

One recent listing clearly describes 'sweeping sunrise, sunset, city, and mountain views' from a high-floor residence, directly confirming sunset visibility from that stack. Other units are described as 'not exposed to the hot afternoon sun' or on the 'cool side', implying that different sides of the building face the afternoon/sunset direction. This new explicit evidence shows that some units do offer sunset views, so the building should be treated as offering sunset-view options.

Agents describe a wide variety of views (ocean, mountains, Diamond Head, city, canal, gardens) but never mention cemeteries or any similar feature. Given the volume and detail of the marketing remarks, it's very likely that cemetery views are not present or relevant for this building.

Listings describe many view types yet do not mention viewing fireworks from lanais or units. Without explicit statements about fireworks visibility, this feature is marked as not present by default.

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

Multiple public remarks across listings explicitly mention on-site management: quotes include 'General Manager on-site', 'Residential Specialists', and 'Residential Specialist available to assist owners and guests at the lobby entrance'. Combined with prior MLS checkbox prevalence for RESMAN, evidence is strong and consistent across different listings and agents that the building has resident/on-site management.

No analysis available

No analysis available