Waikiki Landmark

MLS property data overwhelmingly lists 1992 as the year built (36 of 37 listings), with one outlier at 1999. In the absence of any remarks contradicting this, 1992 is taken as the construction year.

Remarks state the building 'features two, 38-story towers bridged together at the penthouse levels,' which directly establishes a 38-floor height. Other listings referencing high floors and penthouses align with this count, with no conflicting floor totals mentioned.

A listing explicitly notes the building as 'only 196 residential units,' implying this is the total unit count for the project. No other remarks or data contradict this figure, so it is adopted as the building's unit_total.

I searched for owner-occupancy language, including explicit percentages and qualitative phrases like majority owner occupied or highly owner occupied. The remarks do not provide any ownership-occupancy percentage, so I retained the current value of 52.00.

I found references to elevator access and separate elevators for privacy, but no remark explicitly states how many elevators the building has. Since the current value is already set and 38 floors/196 units makes 6 elevators plausible, I kept 6. No evidence in the remarks confirms or contradicts the exact count.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Central A/C is well supported across the building. Current MLS data shows 11/20 listings include ACCEN, and public remarks repeatedly confirm it with phrases like "complete with central AC" and "3 central air conditioning units." The evidence appears consistent across multiple listings and not like a one-off copy-paste error.

7 of 20 current MLS listings flag cable (CABTV) and an agent remark explicitly notes "Other fee of $52/mo. is for basic TV cable." Cable inclusion appears in multiple listings but is not universal across agents, so the evidence is moderate rather than definitive.

There is moderate evidence that common-area electricity is included. The MLS checkbox OTCOEX appears in 11/20 current listings, and one public remark explicitly states maintenance fees include "EVERY utility including... electricity, water, trash and sewer." The support is less direct than for water or sewer, but it is present across the building record.

Remarks repeatedly reference fee-simple ownership and condo-style amenities, never co-op terminology or co-op tax obligations. The complete absence of COOTAX in the MLS confirms that cooperative taxes are not part of the maintenance fees.

A detailed, non-boilerplate remark specifically lists electricity as included in the maintenance fees along with water, trash, and sewer. Even though MLS checkboxes do not consistently reflect this, the explicit narrative description provides strong evidence that electricity is included building-wide.

The building appears to be an all-electric high-rise, with no gas ranges or gas infrastructure mentioned in any listing. With no MLS records indicating gas in the HOA, it is very likely that gas is not provided or included in the maintenance fees.

Hot water appears to be included in the maintenance fee based on current MLS data: 16/20 listings check HOTWAT. Public remarks rarely call it out directly, and while one listing shows WTRHTR elsewhere in the data, the overall record still favors inclusion. This is strong building-level evidence, though mostly from MLS checkboxes rather than remarks.

6 of 20 listings flag internet service, but public remarks and marketing consistently list included utilities ("electricity, water, trash and sewer") while omitting internet/Wi‑Fi. Multiple agents' remarks and the low MLS checkbox prevalence indicate internet is not reliably included in the maintenance fee.

Across all remarks, there is no mention of marina facilities, boat slips, or marina-related amenities. Combined with the complete absence of MARINA in the MLS data, this indicates marina fees or access are not part of the association dues.

Sewer inclusion is strongly supported. Current MLS data shows 18/20 listings with SEWER, and public remarks explicitly mention fees covering "sewer" in several cases. The evidence is consistent and looks reliable across multiple agents and listings.

Water is clearly included in the maintenance fee. Current MLS data shows 19/20 listings with WATER, and remarks repeatedly confirm it with explicit wording like "water" and "electricity, water, trash and sewer." This is one of the strongest signals in the dataset.

BBQ is one of the clearest shared amenities in the building. Many listings across different agents mention BBQ areas, grills, cabanas, or BBQ entertainment space, matching the MLS checkbox data closely and consistently.

0/20 listings reference any form of bicycle storage, and the amenity descriptions consistently omit bike rooms or racks while highlighting many other facilities. Given the breadth of detail agents provide for this luxury building, the absence of any bike-storage mention strongly indicates that dedicated bike storage is not available.

The building overlooks the canal but is not marketed with dock or marina access. The consistent absence of any 'boat dock' or 'marina' language suggests there is no boat docking amenity for residents.

Good evidence: 17/20 MLS records list car wash and multiple public remarks explicitly mention 'car wash in the garage' or 'convenient car wash', indicating the building provides resident car wash facilities.

I did not find convincing evidence of a true clubhouse amenity in the remarks. The building is repeatedly described with pools, gym, lounge, meeting room, and community/recreation spaces, but not a dedicated clubhouse, so this appears unsupported.

Concierge service is explicitly mentioned in numerous remarks, despite being checked in only 5 of 20 MLS records. Key phrases include 'concierge services with multilingual staff,' 'multi-lingual concierge,' 'dedicated concierge,' and 'Residential Specialist' at the lobby/front entry, which together indicate staffed front-desk style service. The evidence is strong and appears across multiple listings rather than a single copied description.

Listings frequently note that the building is pet-friendly but never reference a dedicated dog park or run. Given the lack of textual evidence and almost no MLS support, the building likely does not offer a formal dog park.

Evidence indicates a staffed lobby/attendant presence: many listings describe 'concierge services', 'Residential Specialist available', 'multilingual staff', and 'Residential Specialist at the front entry.' While only ~7/20 current MLS records show the DOORMA checkbox, more than a dozen remarks across different agents describe front-lobby staffing, supporting inclusion of a doorman/lobby-attendant feature at high confidence.

Exercise room/fitness center is well supported across the building. At least 15+ remarks reference a 'fitness center,' 'gym,' or 'fitness facility,' which aligns with the MLS amenities and shows consistent copy across multiple agents rather than a one-off mention.

The building offers concierge and 24-hour security, but there is no indication of any limousine, town car, or similar transportation service. The silence on this specific luxury feature suggests it is not available.

Meeting room availability is consistently supported by the remarks and MLS data. Listings repeatedly cite 'meeting room,' 'conference room,' 'beautiful meeting room,' and 'conference room & more,' suggesting this is a genuine shared building amenity.

Strong evidence across the listings supports patio/deck amenities: roughly 25+ remarks mention "lanai," "private lanai," "balcony," "covered lanai," or the building’s "recreation deck" / "pool deck." This appears consistently across multiple agents and unit types, so it is not just copy-paste checkbox data.

The building is near outdoor areas where residents can walk or jog, but no remarks indicate a dedicated jogging or fitness path as part of the property. The lack of any such mention strongly suggests this amenity does not exist.

Amenities like a kids pool are mentioned but no outdoor play structure or playground is described. The consistent omission plus zero MLS checkmarks indicate there is no children's playground amenity.

No analysis available

Extensive amenity descriptions cover pools, gym, BBQ, lounges, and meeting rooms, but never any putting green. This makes it very likely that a putting green is not part of the building amenities.

Moderately strong evidence: while MLS checkbox shows 6/20, numerous remarks highlight an 'expansive rec deck' or 'outdoor recreation deck' with pools, cabanas, kitchenette and entertainment areas (phrases include 'expansive Rec Deck', 'outdoor recreation deck', 'recreation area'). Several agents independently reference the shared recreation deck, so confidence is solid.

Remarks frequently mention an expansive 'Rec Deck' plus indoor/outdoor social spaces such as a 'stylish lounge with seating and TV,' 'lounge with kitchenette,' 'entertainment area with a flat-screen TV,' 'recreation area,' 'conference room,' and 'exclusive community room.' These spaces fit the definition of shared recreation/entertainment rooms available to residents. With explicit references in multiple listings and MLS amenities often marking RECROO, a building recreation room/area is strongly supported.

Remarks emphasize nearby 'gourmet dining' and 'gourmet level restaurants' but clearly position them as neighborhood amenities, not part of the building. With no explicit reference to an in-building restaurant, this amenity should be considered absent.

The phrase 'deluxe rooftop pool with panoramic ocean and city views' directly indicates rooftop-level amenities. While MLS checkboxes omit ROOFDCK, detailed remarks from at least one agent plus descriptions of elevated pool decks support treating rooftop access/amenities as present.

Agents frequently describe pools, jacuzzies, spas, and gyms, but never a sauna or steam room. Given how often amenities are itemized, this omission strongly indicates that a sauna is not part of the building's offerings.

0/20 recent listings advertise building storage units or lockers, and none check storage-related amenities in the MLS. Remarks repeatedly list extensive amenities (pools, cabanas, gym, meeting room, car wash, concierge, etc.) but never mention common-area storage, suggesting such facilities are not provided or are not a marketed feature.

The public remarks list many amenities (multiple pools, gym, BBQ areas, cabanas, car wash, meeting rooms, security, etc.) but never mention any type of surfboard or board storage. I specifically searched for phrases like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', and 'bike and surfboard storage' and found none, so it is likely this building does not offer dedicated surfboard storage.

Across all provided remarks, amenities such as multiple pools, spas, gym, BBQ areas, lounges, and meeting rooms are described in detail, but tennis courts are never referenced. The near-total absence of tennis in both historical and current narrative descriptions, combined with just 1/20 MLS records checking the tennis box, indicates the building does not offer tennis court facilities. This appears to be a case of occasional MLS miscoding rather than a missing or new feature.

I could not verify a trash chute from the public remarks. Unlike the other amenities, there are no explicit references to a trash/garbage chute in the descriptions, so this looks more like unchecked MLS copy-paste than a confirmed building feature.

No analysis available

The remarks focus on the grand lobby, recreation deck, pools, and location at the 'gateway to Waikiki' but never describe the property as gated, fenced, or walled. With just a single MLS instance of a gated/wall/fence amenity against 19 without it and no textual support, the best interpretation is that the building does not have a defined perimeter wall/fence or gated-community setup. The feature is therefore treated as absent.

Whirlpool/spa amenities are clearly present in the building. Multiple listings mention jacuzzies, whirlpools, hot tubs, or spa areas, and the language is consistent across many agents, indicating a real shared amenity rather than MLS copy-paste noise.

Strong, repeated evidence across the listing set confirms this building has a swimming pool. Roughly every remark batch references the pool amenity in some form, including phrases like 'three resort-style pools,' 'large pool,' 'swimming pool deck,' and 'multi-level pools,' which suggests this is a stable building-wide feature rather than a copy-paste error.

There is strong evidence that the building’s pool is heated, with multiple remarks explicitly saying 'heated pool' and '3 heated pools.' While not every listing mentions it, the repeated wording across several agents supports this as a real amenity rather than a mistaken MLS checkbox.

All provided public remarks were searched for any indication that the swimming pools are salt water (terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater', 'saline', or 'salt pool'). None of the many detailed descriptions of the amenity deck and multiple pools referenced salt water systems, so the pool is assumed not to be salt water based on available remarks. This could be updated if future listings explicitly describe the pool as salt water.

Strong, repeated evidence supports in-unit laundry at Waikiki Landmark. Historical MLS data showed washer/dryer included in 19 of 20 listings, and current public remarks explicitly mention it in multiple units with phrases like "stacked Miele washer & ventless dryer" and "built in washer and dryer." This appears to be consistent across listings and not just a one-off copy-paste error.

Across all provided remarks, there are no mentions of community or shared laundry rooms, coin laundry, or laundry facilities on any floor, despite detailed descriptions of amenities. Instead, multiple listings focus on in-unit washer/dryers, making it unlikely that a separate community laundry is a notable building feature. The lone MLS COMLAU entry is likely an agent mistake rather than evidence of a true shared laundry amenity.

I looked for terms such as 'coin-op', 'coin laundry', 'card-operated laundry', 'paid laundry', and 'laundry fee' and found no matches. Given the focus on in-unit laundry and the lack of any mention of paid common laundry, it's likely there is no notable paid community laundry facility.

I searched the public remarks for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and 'community laundry' and found none. Multiple listings instead highlight in-unit washer/dryer and other amenities, suggesting there is no notable floor-by-floor community laundry setup.

Nearly all listings reference at least one parking stall and a shared parking garage, confirming building parking is universally available. Phrases like “two parking stalls included” and “parking garage” appear across multiple independent listings, so this is not a one-off agent error.

Strong evidence across listings: 19 of 20 MLS records list assigned parking and many remarks explicitly state 'two assigned parking stalls' or 'two assigned, covered parking stalls.' Mentions appear in multiple agent remarks (not isolated), indicating the building offers assigned/reserved parking stalls.

Covered parking is strongly confirmed across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly mention "two covered stalls," "2 assigned, covered parking stalls," "two covered parking stalls in a secure garage," and a "parking garage," showing consistent evidence from many different listings/agents rather than a one-off copy-paste. This aligns with the existing MLS data that all 20 records include covered/garage parking.

I searched for phrases like "deeded parking," "owned stall," or parking included in the deed. The remarks only confirm assigned/covered parking stalls, which supports parking availability but not deeded ownership.

At least one current listing clearly advertises EV charging in the garage (“parking garage offers EV stations”), which is unlikely to be fabricated given its specificity. The absence of the EVCHRG MLS checkbox appears to be an agent oversight rather than proof the stations don’t exist.

I looked for parking fee language such as a monthly charge, rental amount, or additional parking cost. None was mentioned, so there is no evidence of a separate parking fee in the public remarks.

Moderately strong evidence: 13 of 20 MLS records include guest parking and several remarks explicitly mention 'guest parking', 'guest parking and 24/7 security', or 'plenty of parking for your guests.' The amenity is consistently listed across many agent remarks, indicating guest parking is available in the building.

Good evidence of secured-entry parking: 13 of 20 MLS records list secured-entry parking and multiple public remarks explicitly reference a 'secured/secure parking garage' or 'secured parking garage' and 24-hour security. The consistency across several agent remarks supports inclusion of secured-entry parking for the building.

While remarks do not explicitly use the word “tandem,” multiple MLS records flag TANDEM, which is typically tied to the specific deeded stall configuration and less likely to be a generic copy-paste. This suggests at least some units in the building have tandem-style parking stalls.

The building is repeatedly advertised with concierge, security, and guest parking but no listing ever mentions valet or attended parking service. Given both the complete absence of VALET in MLS data and in remarks, it is very likely the building does not offer valet parking.

I searched for any mention of a parking waitlist, parking queue, or instructions to join a waitlist. The listings discuss assigned stalls, guest parking, and a secured garage, but nothing about a waitlist.

Listings emphasize privacy (only three units per floor and separate elevators for certain penthouses) but never reference keyed or fob-access elevators. With no ELEVAT-type security amenity checked in any MLS entry, there is no solid evidence of a dedicated keyed elevator security system as a general building feature. Any potential restricted access appears limited and is not marketed as a building amenity.

Remarks repeatedly note security (e.g., '24-hour security', 'well-managed with 24-hour security', 'secured parking garage') but never mention key card, fob, card reader, or electronic access control. Based on the requirement to rely only on explicit public-remark evidence for this feature, card/fob access cannot be confirmed and is treated as not present.

Security guard service is well supported across the building. Roughly 18 of 20 current MLS records include SECGUA, and many remarks explicitly say '24-hour security,' '24/7 security,' or 'on-site security.' The repetition across many listings and agents makes this a high-confidence building feature.

Listings consistently highlight strong security (e.g., '24-hour security', 'vigilant 24-hour security') but do not describe a patrolling or roving security service. In the absence of explicit references to patrols in the remarks and no prior data, this feature is assumed not present.

Despite very detailed amenity descriptions (security, pools, gym, concierge, etc.), none of the listings mention security cameras, CCTV, or video monitoring. With SECSYS unchecked in all 20 MLS records, the weight of evidence indicates video security is not a defined building amenity for residents. This is treated as absent at the building-amenity level.

Central AC is explicitly mentioned in multiple current remarks across many listings, not just one agent’s copy. Phrases like 'complete with central AC,' 'Central A/C,' '3-zones of central AC,' and 'new zoned AC systems' indicate the feature is real and actively marketed. This aligns with the historically strong MLS consistency and there is no credible evidence of a change away from central air.

Across all 20 listings, there are no references to split, ductless, or mini‑split AC, and the MLS never flags split AC. Remarks that discuss cooling consistently describe multi‑zone central AC rather than individual split systems, so this building should not be considered to offer split AC as a feature.

None of the many listings reference window or wall AC, and the MLS never marks window units for this building. Given the strong evidence of central AC throughout and the building’s luxury profile, it is very unlikely that window AC is a building feature available to residents.

Strong building-level evidence supports concrete construction. Historical MLS data shows 16/20 listings with CONCRE checked, indicating this is likely a consistent property characteristic rather than a one-off agent entry. The current remarks across multiple listings focus on views, amenities, and renovations, and do not contradict the concrete construction indicator.

Majority-checked double-wall construction: 13/20 recent MLS records indicate double-wall and prior evaluations were High confidence. Remarks across many listings (numerous agents) do not explicitly describe construction details or note changes, but the consistent MLS selections and historical consensus support retaining this feature.

Hollow-tile construction is absent from all MLS entries and never referenced in the remarks. Given the tower’s size and typical engineering in Waikiki, hollow-tile construction is very unlikely to be a primary building method here.

Masonry/stucco construction is checked in 3 out of 20 MLS entries, and the building’s style and era make a stucco-type exterior over masonry/concrete likely. No remarks contradict this, so masonry/stucco construction is reasonably inferred.

Only a subset of MLS records (4 of 20) mark steel-frame construction, but this pattern has persisted across multiple listing batches and agents. Remarks consistently portray a tall, architecturally complex twin-tower high-rise, which is consistent with a concrete structure incorporating steel framing, and there are no comments indicating the absence of steel construction. Given this recurring though minority MLS selection and building type, steel-frame is retained as present with moderate confidence rather than being removed as an error.

A few MLS entries recognize slab construction and, given the scale of the twin 38-story towers, a concrete slab or mat foundation is structurally required. Although not marketed in remarks, slab construction is a reasonable inference for this building.

No analysis available

None of the 20 MLS listings check wood-frame construction, and the building is a tall reinforced high-rise where wood framing would not be used structurally. Remarks only mention wood flooring, not wood structure, so wood-frame construction does not apply to this building.

Moderate historical signal: 3 of 20 MLS records list ABOGRO and prior confidence was Medium. Public remarks describe a multi‑story high‑rise/tower (units on 17th, 32nd, 35th floors etc.), implying above‑ground units but do not explicitly state 'above ground construction' or 'above ground materials'. Evidence is limited and appears inconsistent across agents (possible copy‑paste), so overall confidence is low.

Across all listings reviewed, brick construction is never checked in MLS and never mentioned in marketing remarks. Given local building practices and the high-rise design, brick construction can be confidently excluded for this building.

No listings mark single-wall construction and the building is a modern high-rise, where single-wall methods are not used. Both MLS data and basic engineering constraints strongly indicate there is no single-wall construction here.

The remarks clearly indicate short-term rentals are allowed at the 30-day minimum level. That is affirmative evidence that STR is permitted under the building rules referenced in the listings.

I searched for hotel-pool wording such as "hotel rental pool," "hotel program," or brand-managed rental pools (Hilton/Trump/Ritz). None appeared in the remarks, so there is no evidence the building participates in a hotel rental pool.

I looked for language indicating mandatory participation, such as "must participate," "required rental program," or "cannot opt out." The remarks instead suggest optional or owner-controlled rental use, so mandatory pool participation is not supported.

At least one listing clearly advertises 'Fee-simple ownership,' confirming that fee simple units exist in Waikiki Landmark. No remarks refer to lease rent, lease expiry, or leasehold, so the building is documented as offering fee simple ownership (no FS/LH ratio is available because no LH units are described).

Across all collected remarks there are zero references to leasehold, lease rent, or lease expiration, and one listing explicitly promotes 'Fee-simple ownership.' Given how prominently leasehold terms are normally disclosed, this strongly indicates that the building does not offer leasehold units.

I looked for any leasehold language such as lease expiration years, ground lease end dates, or renewal extensions. Instead, the listings explicitly describe the property as fee-simple ownership, which means a lease expiry does not apply here.

I searched the public remarks for explicit language such as "VA approved," "VA loans accepted," or similar VA financing references and found none. With no evidence supporting VA eligibility, this is set to false based on the absence of mentions in the listings.

Multiple listings explicitly describe full/complete insurance coverage, including 100% insured and 100% hurricane coverage. That language strongly supports walls-in/full building insurance, so this feature is set to true with high confidence.

Fire sprinklers appear to be a building feature based on the MLS, with FIRSPR checked in 14 of 20 current listings. None of the public remarks explicitly mention sprinkler systems or fire suppression, so the evidence looks like checkbox-level MLS data rather than agent remark confirmation. Still, the repeated current checkbox pattern across many listings is enough to support inclusion.

I searched the public remarks for FLSE/pass language, fire life safety evaluation, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, and passed fire inspection. Nothing in the listings explicitly indicates the building passed this type of evaluation, so I cannot mark it true from the available remarks.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Ocean views are strongly supported across many listings. At least 9 current remarks mention ocean views directly, with phrases like 'panoramic Ocean,' 'partial ocean vistas,' 'beautiful ocean view,' and 'glimpse of the ocean,' suggesting this is a real building-level offering rather than a one-off copy-paste claim.

Numerous listings explicitly advertise mountain/Koolau or mauka views (examples: “unobstructed views of the Koolaus,” “majestic Koolau Mountain vistas,” “mountain and canal views”), appearing across many units and agents. This is consistent and strong evidence that the building offers mountain views.

Diamond Head views are confirmed by multiple listings and are repeatedly paired with ocean/city/mountain views. The language is explicit—such as 'DH view' and 'iconic Diamond Head'—which makes this high-confidence for building search purposes.

City views are one of the most consistently mentioned features in the listing remarks. With 14/20 MLS entries showing city-related view terms and multiple explicit phrases like 'sweeping city views' and 'cityscape,' this is highly reliable.

Agents frequently describe “panoramic Ocean…views,” “breathtaking panoramic views of the Ocean, Diamond Head, Canal, and Mountains,” and similar phrases but never mention extended “coastline,” “shoreline,” or “coastal” vistas. Even the most expansive high-floor views are framed as ocean views only, so coastline views are not a clearly advertised building feature.

Listings describe residents enjoying a 'lushly landscaped garden oasis' and a 'beautifully landscaped garden retreat' in conjunction with building amenities. These phrases imply that at least some units or common areas look out onto landscaped garden spaces, making garden views a real feature of the property.

I am correcting this to false because the remarks do not support any golf course view. The available text mentions proximity to a golf course at most, but no listing says the building or units have fairway, greens, or golf course views.

Several public remarks explicitly reference the Ala Wai Canal/canal views (phrases include 'Ala Wai Canal,' 'canal views,' and 'overlooking the scenic Ala Wai Canal'), and historical summaries showed multiple listings mentioning the canal/harbor. Evidence is consistent across listings and supports inclusion of marina/harbor/canal views for the building.

Sunrise views are well supported by the remarks. At least 9 listings mention sunrise or morning light directly, and the phrasing is explicit enough to treat this as a real view orientation available in the building.

Sunset views are confirmed, though less frequently than ocean or city views. The strongest evidence is the explicit phrase 'sweeping sunrise, sunset, city, and mountain views,' which directly validates sunset exposure in the building.

Agents describe a wide variety of views (ocean, mountains, Diamond Head, city, canal, gardens) but never mention cemeteries or any similar feature. Given the volume and detail of the marketing remarks, it's very likely that cemetery views are not present or relevant for this building.

Listings describe many view types yet do not mention viewing fireworks from lanais or units. Without explicit statements about fireworks visibility, this feature is marked as not present by default.

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

Multiple public remarks across listings explicitly mention on-site management: quotes include 'General Manager on-site', 'Residential Specialists', and 'Residential Specialist available to assist owners and guests at the lobby entrance'. Combined with prior MLS checkbox prevalence for RESMAN, evidence is strong and consistent across different listings and agents that the building has resident/on-site management.

No analysis available

No analysis available