Waikiki Beach Tower
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Waikiki Beach Tower
Building Overview
Waikiki Beach Tower in Waikiki — 39-story concrete building with ocean and mountain views.
About Waikiki Beach Tower
Waikiki Beach Tower is a residential high-rise in the Central Waikiki neighborhood. According to available records, the building was completed in 1983, has 39 floors and 142 total units, and is constructed of concrete.
The building offers on-site amenities including a pool, fitness center, and BBQ area. On-site staffing and services listed in MLS data include a resident manager, concierge, and security guard. The building has central air conditioning and four elevators.
Additional details from MLS data note that parking is available, covered, and assigned with guest parking provided. Pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are permitted. The management company is listed as Aqua Aston. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all information and current policies with the managing agent or condominium association.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy indicators, including a percentage or descriptive phrases like majority owner occupied. No such evidence appears in the remarks, so the current value is retained with low confidence.
The public remarks directly confirm that the building has 2 elevators, matching the current value. This is repeated across multiple listings, so confidence is very high.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
Central air conditioning is directly confirmed in the remarks. Several listings explicitly say 'central AC' or 'a central AC system,' and the MLS pattern is moderately strong, so this appears to be a real building feature rather than copy-paste noise.
Cable TV inclusion is strongly supported at the building level. The current MLS pattern is overwhelming, with 20 of 20 listings showing CABTV in association_fee_includes, which looks like a consistent building amenity rather than a one-off agent checkbox.
Common area electricity has some MLS support, but it is not especially strong. With only 8 of 20 listings showing OTCOEX and no explicit remark confirmation, this looks inconsistent and may reflect agent-level checkbox variation.
No analysis available
Electricity inclusion is extremely well supported. Every current MLS listing shows ELECTR in association_fee_includes, making this one of the clearest building-level fee inclusions.
No analysis available
Hot water inclusion appears inconsistent and is not well supported. The presence of WTRHTR in the MLS data is a strong counter-signal, and the public remarks do not provide any explicit confirmation of hot water being included in the maintenance fee.
Internet inclusion is strongly supported by the MLS records. With 17 of 20 current listings showing INTSER, this looks like a consistent building amenity even though the public remarks do not mention it directly.
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is strongly supported at the building level. The MLS pattern is consistent across most current listings, and there is no contradictory evidence in the public remarks.
Water inclusion is extremely well supported. All 20 current MLS listings show WATER in association_fee_includes, making this a highly reliable building feature.
BBQ/grilling facilities are consistently confirmed in the remarks and strongly reinforced by MLS history. Listings repeatedly reference "BBQ cabanas," "BBQ pavilions," and "BBQ area/stations," showing broad agreement across multiple agents. This is a clear shared amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Clubhouse availability is explicitly stated in at least one listing, and the building’s shared amenity language is consistent with that. The evidence is not widespread, but it is direct.
Concierge service is strongly supported by both MLS data and public remarks. Numerous listings describe 'concierge service,' '24-hour valet and concierge service,' or 'full-service concierge/valet,' showing consistent building-level service. The evidence appears broad and repeated, not limited to a single agent's wording.
No analysis available
I do not see direct evidence of a doorman or lobby attendant in the public remarks. References are instead to valet, concierge, or security, suggesting the DOORMA checkbox may be inconsistent or copy-pasted rather than a confirmed building feature.
Exercise-room/fitness-center access is well supported across many listings. Multiple remarks explicitly say "fitness center," "gym," and "yoga room," which matches the high-confidence MLS history. This appears to be a real shared building amenity rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
Meeting-room access is supported by both MLS history and at least one explicit remark. The clearest phrasing is "conference room," which fits the building-level meeting room/board room concept. This is enough to include the feature with high confidence.
Evidence for patio/deck-style outdoor space is very strong and consistent. Multiple listings describe a 'large lanai,' 'spacious private lanai,' 'covered lanai,' and even 'deck' or 'outdoor living space,' confirming this as a building-level amenity available to buyers. The repeated language across many remarks looks broad and not like a one-off agent copy.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
A recreation-area type amenity is strongly supported by the MLS pattern and the public remarks. While the wording varies, listings repeatedly describe "lounge areas," "sun deck/sundeck," "deck," and "pavilions," which function as recreation-space equivalents. The evidence is broad and consistent enough to treat this as a building amenity.
Confidence 88%: 4/6 MLS listings include RECROO, and remarks about a 'club house' and 'meeting room' suggest enclosed recreation/club spaces.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sauna is not supported by the public remarks. Even though a few MLS records check the box, the repeated absence of any sauna/steam-room language across many listings suggests the amenity is likely not present or not reliably advertised.
No analysis available
I searched for surfboard storage and related amenity wording like board storage or surf storage. The remarks do mention surfing nearby and beach activities, but nothing about a dedicated surfboard storage facility.
Tennis courts are explicitly mentioned in at least one listing, which is enough to support the feature for a building-level amenity. The evidence is limited, so confidence is moderate rather than high.
Trash chute appears to be a real building feature based primarily on the strong MLS history. Public remarks do not mention it, but the high rate of checked listings makes it likely to exist as a shared amenity. There is no evidence of a correction or building change that would justify removing it.
Valet service is overwhelmingly supported by both MLS data and remarks. At least several listings explicitly mention '24-hour valet and concierge service,' 'valet parking available,' or 'full-service concierge/valet,' which is consistent with a true building amenity rather than a checkbox error. The consistency across many listings makes this highly reliable.
No analysis available
Whirlpool/hot tub/spa access is strongly supported. Remarks use equivalent language such as "jacuzzi," "whirlpool," "hot tub," and "hot tubs," and the MLS history also shows a strong share of listings checked for the feature. This is clearly a shared amenity.
The evidence strongly supports that Waikiki Beach Tower has a pool. Dozens of current remarks across many listings explicitly mention a pool, including "heated pool," "swimming pool," "newly renovated pool," and "brand-new remodeled pool," often alongside other shared amenities like jacuzzi/whirlpool and BBQ areas. This is consistent across multiple agents and appears to reflect a real building amenity rather than a copy-paste error.
There is solid evidence that the building's pool is heated. At least one current remark explicitly says "heated pool," and the historical amenity pattern already indicated heat-pool support. The evidence is consistent with a true building-level feature rather than an isolated unit claim.
I looked for explicit references to a saltwater or saline pool. The pool is described as heated, renovated, or part of resort amenities, but there is no wording confirming salt water.
Evidence is overwhelming that Waikiki Beach Tower offers in-unit laundry. Multiple listings explicitly mention "in unit washer and dryer," "in-unit washer/dryer," and "washer/dryer in unit," which matches the current MLS inclusions showing washer/dryer on 20 of 20 listings. The consistency across many remarks and agents indicates this is a real building feature, not a checkbox mistake.
No analysis available
I looked for language indicating coin laundry, laundry fees, or other paid laundry access. The remarks repeatedly mention in-unit washer and dryer instead, with no evidence of a shared paid laundry facility.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," and similar floor-by-floor laundry references. The listings only mention in-unit washer/dryer, so there is no evidence that community laundry is available on every floor.
No analysis available
Assigned parking is clearly supported across many listings, with numerous remarks explicitly stating 'one assigned parking stall' or '1 assigned parking.' The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error. This is a high-confidence building feature.
Covered parking is strongly supported across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly say "one assigned covered parking," "one covered parking spot," or note valet parking/assigned stalls, and the feature appears in many separate listings rather than a single copy-paste mention. This is consistent with the historical high-confidence MLS data and does not appear to have changed.
I searched for wording like deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included by deed and found no explicit match. The listings only reference assigned parking stalls and valet service, which is not enough to call the parking deeded.
No analysis available
I looked for a parking charge, monthly parking fee, or rental cost and found nothing. The remarks mention parking availability and valet service, but no explicit parking cost.
Guest parking is not corroborated by the public remarks: none of the listings clearly mention guest or visitor parking availability. The MLS checkbox appears in only a small subset of records, which looks more like inconsistent agent input than verified building information. This feature is best treated as not supported by the available remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like "parking waitlist," "parking waiting list," or instructions to join a parking waitlist and found none. The listings discuss assigned parking and valet parking instead.
No analysis available
I searched for card/fob access language such as keycard entry or electronic access. The remarks mention 24-hour security, concierge, valet, and a private secure entrance, but not a card-based access system.
Security guard service is strongly supported across the building. Multiple listings explicitly mention '24-hour security,' '24-hr security,' or similar wording, and the MLS is checked in 18/20 listings. The repeated mentions across different remarks indicate this is not just copy-paste noise.
I looked for public remarks describing patrol service or roving security. The listings only reference 24-hour security and concierge/valet service, with no explicit mention of security patrol.
No analysis available
Central air conditioning is strongly supported across the building. Multiple remarks explicitly mention “central AC” / “a central AC system,” and the existing MLS data is overwhelmingly consistent with that feature (17/20 listings in unit_features, 19/20 in inclusions). The evidence appears to be broad across listings rather than a one-off copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence supports concrete construction for Waikiki Beach Tower. Current MLS data shows 20 out of 20 listings marked CONCRE, while the public remarks consistently reference the same building and do not contradict the material. This appears to be stable, building-wide MLS information rather than a unit-specific or agent copy/paste issue.
Double-wall construction is supported by MLS data, though less consistently than concrete. Current listings show DOUWAL in 10 of 20 records, and earlier MLS history was 4 of 6, indicating a recurring building-level entry rather than a one-off mistake. No remarks explicitly describe double-wall construction, so confidence is solid but below the concrete feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks consistently state that short-term rentals are legally allowed in this building. Several listings mention resort zoning, legal daily/nightly vacation rentals, and the ability to Airbnb or use a vacation rental company.
There is strong evidence that the building participates in a hotel rental pool/program. Multiple listings mention the Aston Hotel Rental Program, Aqua-Aston program, or being in the hotel pool.
The remarks clearly show hotel-pool participation is optional rather than mandatory. Several listings say owners may use the Aston program, hire an outside manager, or self-manage, which rules out a required pool arrangement.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for ground lease, leasehold, lease expiry, or renewal language and did not find a specific expiration year. The remarks repeatedly describe the building as fee simple, and while some listings mention easement rent, none provide a lease termination date.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA-loan language such as "VA approved" or "VA financing accepted" and found none. The listings discuss short-term rental and hotel-program flexibility, but do not mention VA eligibility.
I searched the remarks for HOA insurance wording like fully insured, full coverage, walls-in coverage, or comprehensive building insurance. There were no references, so this feature cannot be confirmed from the public remarks.
Fire sprinklers are only weakly supported for this building. There are 6 of 20 current listings with FIRSPR checked, but the remarks across the listings do not mention any sprinkler system, fire sprinklers, or fire suppression details. This looks more like inconsistent MLS checkbox data than strong building-level confirmation.
I searched the remarks for fire/life-safety compliance language such as FLSE passed, fire inspection passed, life safety compliant, and fire safety certified. Nothing in the provided listings confirms this feature, so it remains unverified.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are overwhelmingly established for this building. Multiple remarks explicitly mention “breathtaking panoramic ocean views,” “direct views of the Pacific Ocean,” “unobstructed ocean views,” and “direct ocean view,” appearing across many listings from different agents rather than a single copy-paste source.
Mountain views appear to be available in some units, though not as universally as ocean views. Remarks include phrases like "Koolau Mountains" and "mountain view from the bedrooms," matching the MLS data that 5/20 listings code mountain views. This is solid building-level evidence that some buyers could seek.
Diamond Head views are clearly supported for some units in the building. Remarks mention "breathtaking ocean and Diamond Head views," "unobstructed view of the ocean, Diamond Head," and "iconic Diamond Head just moments away," with the strongest support coming from multiple explicit view statements. The MLS data also shows 7/20 listings with DIAHEA.
City views are well supported across the listings. Remarks describe "Waikiki's dazzling city skyline," "sparkling city skyline," "beautiful ocean and city views," and "mountain and city views," while MLS data shows CITY in 10/20 listings. This is strong evidence that city-facing units are available in the building.
Coastline views are well supported by both MLS data and remarks. Listings describe "the coastline," "directly across from Waikiki's coastline," and "shoreline" views, aligning with 8/20 listings coded COASTL. This indicates coastline-oriented units are a real and recurring feature of the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunrise/morning views have moderate support, but the evidence is less explicit than for ocean or sunset views. A few MLS listings are coded SUNRIS, and some remarks describe east-side or corner units with strong natural light, which suggests morning exposure. However, direct sunrise mentions are sparse, so confidence is lower.
Sunset views are strongly supported for this building. Remarks across multiple listings describe “stunning sunsets,” “golden sunsets,” and “ocean and Sunset views,” which aligns with the current MLS view data and does not look like an isolated error or agent copy-paste issue.
No analysis available
I searched for wording such as "fireworks view," "watch fireworks from the lanai," or similar explicit view references. The remarks describe ocean, sunset, Diamond Head, and city views, but do not state that units can see fireworks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks mention a resident manager, on-site manager, live-in manager, or building manager on property. Despite 3 of 20 current MLS listings showing RESMAN checked, the absence of any supporting remarks across many listings makes this look like inconsistent or copied MLS data rather than a verified amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.