Waiau Gardens Kai D
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Waiau Gardens Kai D
Building Overview
Waiau Gardens Kai D in Pearl City — built 1973, offers a pool and on-site resident manager.
About Waiau Gardens Kai D
Waiau Gardens Kai D is a residential building located in the Pearl City neighborhood. According to available records, the building was built in 1973. MLS-provided data does not include unit size ranges or construction type, so those details should be confirmed with the listing agent or management.
Based on MLS data, on-site amenities include a pool and a resident manager. The building's pet policy and short-term rental policy are recorded as not allowed.
Parking is available and assigned. The management company is listed as unknown in MLS records. Buyers should verify current fees, rules, maintenance assessments, and any additional building details with the managing agent or through official condominium documentation.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit percentages (e.g., 70% owner occupied) or qualitative phrases indicating high owner occupancy but found none. Without any such reference, the owner-occupancy rate for this building cannot be determined from the available remarks.
The remarks describe 2-story townhomes, layouts, renovations, and amenities like pool and parks but never reference elevators or lifts. Because there is no explicit statement about elevators, the number of elevators for this building remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
At least one listing’s remarks clearly say “The $611 monthly maintenance fee includes $65 for the Spectrum bulk cable fee,” indicating cable is bundled into the HOA. This is reinforced by 4 of 7 MLS listings checking the cable TV inclusion box, suggesting a consistent building-level bulk cable arrangement rather than an isolated case.
A majority (5/7) of MLS listings show common area electricity included in the association fee, which is typical for townhome complexes like this. Although remarks don’t mention it explicitly, the consistent MLS checkbox data across multiple agents indicates that common-area electric is paid through the maintenance fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across all 7 listings, hot water is never marked as an HOA-included utility, and every unit instead shows its own water heater in the inclusions. This pattern strongly supports that residents heat their own water and hot water is not covered by the maintenance fees.
Across current listings, 2 of 7 have the INTSER checkbox marked, similar to prior MLS patterns indicating internet as part of the association fee. Remarks do not explicitly mention internet, but one unit’s fee breakdown references a Spectrum bulk cable fee, implying a shared telecom arrangement. Given recurring MLS indications and no statements that internet is separately billed, it is moderately likely that internet is included in the maintenance fees for this complex.
No analysis available
Every recent listing (7/7) marks sewer as included in the maintenance fee, which is standard for similar townhouse complexes. The unanimity across multiple agents and units provides strong evidence that sewer charges are covered by the HOA dues.
Water is consistently shown as included in the association fee in all 7 available MLS records. This uniform data across multiple listings and agents strongly supports that domestic water charges are paid through the maintenance fees for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings for this building reference private outdoor spaces, including phrases like "covered Lanai," "private back porch that sits above the other units," and "your own covered lanai." Along with 5 of 7 MLS entries checking patio/deck-related amenities, this indicates that units in the building commonly offer patio or deck-style outdoor areas. Buyers seeking homes with patios/decks would reasonably consider this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks discuss features like pet-friendliness, pool, parks, parking, and interior renovations but do not mention any surfboard-specific storage. I searched for terms such as 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', and 'bike and surfboard storage' and found no evidence that such a facility exists in the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Two separate listings explicitly describe access to a shared pool, including 'close to the neighborhood park and pool' and 'Take a swim in the community's pool,' indicating a common/community pool for residents. This aligns with 7 of 7 current MLS records marking a pool amenity, suggesting consistent agent reporting rather than an isolated checkbox error. Overall evidence strongly supports that the building complex offers a community pool.
No analysis available
Multiple listings reference a pool (e.g., 'neighborhood park and pool', 'Take a swim in the community's pool') but none describe it as salt water. Searched for 'salt water pool', 'saltwater', 'saline', and similar wording and found no matches, so the presence of a salt water pool cannot be confirmed.
Multiple listings for this building indicate in-unit laundry, with 7/7 current MLS entries including washer/dryer in the inclusions. One listing’s remarks specifically note a newly installed in-unit "washer & dryer" as part of an interior renovation, with no evidence that laundry is limited to a common area. This provides strong building-level evidence that at least some units offer in-unit laundry, making the feature relevant for buyers searching this amenity.
No analysis available
I looked for terms like 'coin-op', 'coin laundry', 'card-operated', or 'paid laundry' and did not find any references. Listings instead highlight in-unit appliances, so there is no evidence that any community laundry, if present, requires payment.
I searched the remarks for any references to community or shared laundry, including phrases like 'laundry on each floor' or 'community laundry room', and found none. The presence of in-unit laundry suggests shared laundry on every floor is unlikely, but this is not definitively ruled out.
Across 7 of 7 recent listings, MLS ParkingFeatures always indicates some form of parking and never 'NONE,' strongly implying that units in this building come with at least one stall. While the public remarks are mostly silent on resident parking, one listing mentions 'ample street parking for guests,' which supports the presence of on-site resident parking plus additional guest options. The consistency across multiple agents and listings suggests this is a real building feature, not a one-off checkbox error.
The ASSIGN flag appears in the ParkingFeatures field for every one of the 7 analyzed listings, indicating that stalls are specifically assigned or reserved to units. Even though the public remarks do not spell this out, the uniform MLS coding across multiple listings and agents is strong evidence that assigned parking is a standard feature here. In the absence of any contradictory descriptions, this is very likely an accurate reflection of the building's parking setup.
No analysis available
None of the public remarks state that any parking stall is deeded, owned with the unit, or included in the unit's title. Because marketing copy typically highlights deeded parking when present, the absence of such language suggests it is likely not deeded, but this is not certain.
No analysis available
The listings do not specify any additional monthly cost for parking beyond the maintenance fee. Since a distinct parking fee is never identified, we cannot infer an amount. This field remains unknown until a listing explicitly states a parking charge.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Agents typically disclose parking waitlists because they affect usability and expectations. The complete lack of references to any waitlist suggests there may not be such a system, but this cannot be confirmed definitively from the text alone.
No analysis available
The remarks focus on renovations, layout, location, and nearby amenities such as parks and the community pool, but do not reference any type of card or fob access system. I searched for terms like key card, keycard, fob, electronic access, and controlled entry and found no evidence that such a system exists, so this feature is assumed not present.
No analysis available
All listings describe the unit condition, remodels, pet-friendliness, and proximity to malls, schools, and parks, but say nothing about security patrol services. I specifically looked for phrases like security patrol, roving security, on-site security, and patrolled and found no references, so this feature is assumed not present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Double-wall construction appears consistently in the MLS data, with 7/7 listings checking DOUWAL. No public remarks explicitly mention double-wall construction, but the uniform checkbox selection across all units strongly indicates the building is of double-wall construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Above-ground construction is not mentioned in any of the 7 listings’ public remarks, and only 2/7 listings have the ABOGRO checkbox selected while most do not. This inconsistent MLS usage suggests it is not a reliable or defining construction feature for the building, so it is treated as not present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The marketing emphasizes homeownership, renovations, and everyday living, with no sign of vacation or short-term rental positioning. In the absence of explicit STR language, it is safer to assume short-term rentals are not allowed or at least not actively supported. This remains a moderate-confidence inference pending explicit confirmation.
The building operates as a residential townhome community, not a condo-hotel. There is no indication of any hotel rental pool program associated with the project, so this feature is considered not present.
Since there is no hotel pool or formal rental program described, there cannot be a mandatory participation requirement. All evidence points to standard residential ownership with flexibility for owners, not compulsory hotel-style pooling.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All listings read like standard fee simple townhomes and never reference any ground lease or leasehold terms. Without an explicit lease expiry year, this field must remain unknown. If the project is fee simple, there would be no lease expiry to record.
Multiple listings describe an existing VA assumable loan on a unit, which strongly implies the building is approved for VA financing. While they do not literally say "VA project approved," VA loans on condos/townhomes require such approval. Taken together, this supports marking the building as VA-financeable.
The remarks do not reference full insurance, fully insured building, comprehensive HOA insurance, or walls-in coverage. Since this type of coverage is not mentioned at all, it is treated as not confirmed/likely not present rather than assumed true.
No analysis available
I searched for terms such as fire life safety evaluation, FLSE, fire inspection, life safety compliant, or similar language and found none. In the absence of any mention, it is assumed the building has not explicitly advertised passing a fire/life safety evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of seven current MLS listings for this building has CITY checked in the view field, while one listing specifies no view and the rest do not comment on view. No public remarks explicitly describe city or downtown views, so this feature is inferred primarily from the MLS checkbox data and treated as available in at least some units but with modest confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Listings describe interior renovations, layouts, location, and amenities like parks and a pool, but do not reference any fireworks views. Since such a selling point is typically highlighted if present, the building is assumed not to have notable fireworks views from units based on current remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox data shows RESMAN selected in 6/7 current listings, indicating the presence of a resident/on-site manager for the complex. None of the remarks explicitly reference a resident manager, but they focus mainly on unit renovations, layout, and location, and do not contradict the amenity. The consistency across multiple listings from likely different agents supports treating resident_manager as a valid building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.