Waiau Gardens Kai D
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Waiau Gardens Kai D
Building Overview
Waiau Gardens Kai D in Pearl City — built 1973, offers a pool and on-site resident manager.
About Waiau Gardens Kai D
Waiau Gardens Kai D is a residential building located in the Pearl City neighborhood. According to available records, the building was built in 1973. MLS-provided data does not include unit size ranges or construction type, so those details should be confirmed with the listing agent or management.
Based on MLS data, on-site amenities include a pool and a resident manager. The building's pet policy and short-term rental policy are recorded as not allowed.
Parking is available and assigned. The management company is listed as unknown in MLS records. Buyers should verify current fees, rules, maintenance assessments, and any additional building details with the managing agent or through official condominium documentation.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit percentages (e.g., 70% owner occupied) or qualitative phrases indicating high owner occupancy but found none. Without any such reference, the owner-occupancy rate for this building cannot be determined from the available remarks.
The remarks describe 2-story townhomes, layouts, renovations, and amenities like pool and parks but never reference elevators or lifts. Because there is no explicit statement about elevators, the number of elevators for this building remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable is confirmed by an explicit remark: "The $611 monthly maintenance fee includes $65 for the Spectrum bulk cable fee." Current MLS data also shows 5 of 8 listings with CABTV, which is consistent across multiple agents and not just a one-off checkbox. Confidence is very high that cable TV is included in the fee.
There are no explicit remarks about common area electricity or building power being included. Although current MLS data shows 6 of 8 listings with OTCOEX, that is not enough to override the absence of supporting remarks, especially given the likelihood of checkbox copy/paste errors. Confidence is high enough to omit the feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is not supported by the listings: 0 of 8 MLS records mark HOTWAT, while all 8 show WTRHTR. The remarks also mention a washer/dryer and water heater in the unit, which aligns with unit-supplied hot water rather than building-included hot water. Confidence is very high that hot water is not included in the maintenance fee.
Across current listings, 2 of 7 have the INTSER checkbox marked, similar to prior MLS patterns indicating internet as part of the association fee. Remarks do not explicitly mention internet, but one unit’s fee breakdown references a Spectrum bulk cable fee, implying a shared telecom arrangement. Given recurring MLS indications and no statements that internet is separately billed, it is moderately likely that internet is included in the maintenance fees for this complex.
No analysis available
Sewer is consistently included across all available MLS records: 8 of 8 listings show SEWER. There are no remarks contradicting this, so this appears to be a stable building expense included in the maintenance fee. Confidence is extremely high.
Water is included across all current MLS records, with 8 of 8 listings showing WATER. The public remarks do not contradict this, and the repeated MLS pattern suggests it is a standard building inclusion rather than an agent-specific entry. Confidence is extremely high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings for this building reference private outdoor spaces, including phrases like "covered Lanai," "private back porch that sits above the other units," and "your own covered lanai." Along with 5 of 7 MLS entries checking patio/deck-related amenities, this indicates that units in the building commonly offer patio or deck-style outdoor areas. Buyers seeking homes with patios/decks would reasonably consider this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks discuss features like pet-friendliness, pool, parks, parking, and interior renovations but do not mention any surfboard-specific storage. I searched for terms such as 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', and 'bike and surfboard storage' and found no evidence that such a facility exists in the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly supported across multiple current listings, not just one agent remark. At least 3 listings explicitly mention a shared/community pool, which aligns with the prior high-confidence MLS amenity data and suggests this is a real building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
Multiple listings reference a pool (e.g., 'neighborhood park and pool', 'Take a swim in the community's pool') but none describe it as salt water. Searched for 'salt water pool', 'saltwater', 'saline', and similar wording and found no matches, so the presence of a salt water pool cannot be confirmed.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the listings. Historical MLS data shows 8/8 entries including washer/dryer, and current remarks explicitly mention a "custom-built laundry center" plus "washer & dryer." The evidence is consistent and appears to be repeated by multiple agents rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
I looked for terms like 'coin-op', 'coin laundry', 'card-operated', or 'paid laundry' and did not find any references. Listings instead highlight in-unit appliances, so there is no evidence that any community laundry, if present, requires payment.
I searched the remarks for any references to community or shared laundry, including phrases like 'laundry on each floor' or 'community laundry room', and found none. The presence of in-unit laundry suggests shared laundry on every floor is unlikely, but this is not definitively ruled out.
Parking is strongly supported across the listings: current MLS data shows 8 of 8 listings with some form of parking feature and none marked NONE. Remarks explicitly mention "1 assigned parking stall" and also note "ample street parking for guests," indicating parking is available at the building/unit level rather than being a copied checkbox without support.
The ASSIGN flag appears in the ParkingFeatures field for every one of the 7 analyzed listings, indicating that stalls are specifically assigned or reserved to units. Even though the public remarks do not spell this out, the uniform MLS coding across multiple listings and agents is strong evidence that assigned parking is a standard feature here. In the absence of any contradictory descriptions, this is very likely an accurate reflection of the building's parking setup.
No analysis available
I searched for terms like deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in deed. The remarks consistently say the home has an assigned parking spot, but they do not state that the stall is deeded. Based on the public remarks, deeded parking is not supported.
No analysis available
I looked for any mention of parking rent, a monthly parking charge, or an additional parking fee. The remarks only note an assigned parking spot and guest street parking, with no cost information. There is not enough evidence to identify a parking fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for phrases such as "parking waitlist," "waiting list," or instructions to join a waitlist for parking. The listings do not mention any waitlist system. The only parking detail is that the unit has one assigned spot.
No analysis available
The remarks focus on renovations, layout, location, and nearby amenities such as parks and the community pool, but do not reference any type of card or fob access system. I searched for terms like key card, keycard, fob, electronic access, and controlled entry and found no evidence that such a system exists, so this feature is assumed not present.
No analysis available
All listings describe the unit condition, remodels, pet-friendliness, and proximity to malls, schools, and parks, but say nothing about security patrol services. I specifically looked for phrases like security patrol, roving security, on-site security, and patrolled and found no references, so this feature is assumed not present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC appears to be a real feature for this building. Across the provided remarks, 1 listing explicitly says 'each bedroom includes new AC units,' while the current MLS data shows ACWIUN in 7/8 listings, suggesting this is not a one-off copy/paste error. The evidence is strong enough to include the feature for buyers searching for units with AC.
No analysis available
Double-wall construction is strongly supported by the MLS data, with 8 of 8 listings checking DOUWAL. Public remarks do not explicitly describe it, but the repeated MLS consistency across all current listings makes this a high-confidence building feature.
No analysis available
Evidence for masonry/stucco construction is weak: 1 of 8 listings shows MASSTU in the MLS, but no public remarks mention "masonry," "stucco," or related construction details. Because the current support is sparse and unconfirmed by remarks, this should be treated cautiously.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Above-ground construction is not mentioned in any of the 7 listings’ public remarks, and only 2/7 listings have the ABOGRO checkbox selected while most do not. This inconsistent MLS usage suggests it is not a reliable or defining construction feature for the building, so it is treated as not present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I checked for short-term rental indicators such as "STR allowed," "vacation rental," "NUC," or "TVU," as well as restriction language like a 30-day minimum or owner-occupant-only rules. None of the remarks mention short-term rental permission, so there is no public evidence that STRs are allowed. Based on the available text, this is not confirmed.
I looked for hotel-pool language like "hotel rental pool," "managed by hotel," or brand-specific rental pool references. None appear, and because STR is not supported, this must be false.
I searched for phrases such as "mandatory hotel pool," "must participate," or "cannot opt out." There is no evidence of any rental pool program, so this is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for ground-lease or leasehold language such as "lease expires," "ground lease ends," "leasehold expiring," or a renewal year. The remarks read like standard townhome descriptions and do not provide any lease-expiry date. No year can be extracted from the public remarks.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA-related language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," and "VA loans accepted." None of the listings mention VA eligibility, so there is no public evidence to support it. With no current remark evidence, this is treated as not confirmed.
The remarks do not reference full insurance, fully insured building, comprehensive HOA insurance, or walls-in coverage. Since this type of coverage is not mentioned at all, it is treated as not confirmed/likely not present rather than assumed true.
No analysis available
I searched for terms such as fire life safety evaluation, FLSE, fire inspection, life safety compliant, or similar language and found none. In the absence of any mention, it is assumed the building has not explicitly advertised passing a fire/life safety evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are confirmed by at least one listing remark: "peekaboo ocean view from the dining area." Current MLS data also shows OCEAN in the view field for 1 of 8 listings, so this appears to be a real building feature available in at least some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
City views appear in the current MLS data for 3 of 8 listings. No public remarks explicitly describe a city view, so this looks more like MLS-level evidence than repeated marketing language, but it is still enough to support the feature at the building level.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views have limited evidence: 1 of 8 current MLS listings includes SUNSET in the view field. Because there are no corroborating remarks, confidence is moderate rather than strong, but it still suggests some units may offer sunset exposure.
No analysis available
Listings describe interior renovations, layouts, location, and amenities like parks and a pool, but do not reference any fireworks views. Since such a selling point is typically highlighted if present, the building is assumed not to have notable fireworks views from units based on current remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager/on-site management appears to be an existing building feature based on MLS data, with 7 of 8 current listings marking RESMAN. None of the public remarks explicitly say “resident manager” or “on-site manager,” so the evidence is stronger in the checkbox data than in the narrative remarks. Because the checkbox is repeated across most listings, this looks like a consistent building amenity rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.