Waialae Gardens
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Waialae Gardens
Building Overview
Waialae Gardens in Waialae-Kahala — 1972 concrete building with ocean views, pool and resident manager.
About Waialae Gardens
Waialae Gardens is a residential building located in the Waialae-Kahala neighborhood. According to available records the building was constructed in 1972 using concrete. Specific building size or unit count is not provided in the MLS data.
Key amenities reported in the MLS include an on-site pool and a resident manager. Units are noted to have window air conditioning and the building offers ocean views as a feature of some residences.
Parking is available and assigned. Pets and short-term rentals are not permitted per the MLS listing. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for owner-occupancy clues such as percentages, 'highly owner occupied,' or 'majority owner occupied,' but found none. The remarks do mention investor potential and a tenant-occupied unit, but that is not enough to estimate the building's overall owner-occupancy rate.
I searched the remarks for an explicit elevator count such as '1 elevator,' '4 elevators,' or 'multiple elevators,' but did not find a number. The building is clearly described as having an elevator, likely a single one in this low-rise tower, but the exact count is not stated anywhere in the public remarks.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable inclusion is strongly supported across the building. At least 2 public remarks explicitly mention cable being included, and the MLS pattern is highly consistent at 17 of 20 listings. This looks like a real building-level fee inclusion rather than a one-off agent checkbox.
Common-area electricity appears to be a building-level expense included in maintenance fees based on the MLS pattern. No public remarks directly call it out, so this is supported mainly by the consistent checkbox data rather than text confirmation. It still looks more likely to be real than a copy-paste error given the 16 of 20 frequency.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water inclusion is not supported. The MLS pattern is very clear: 0 of 20 listings show HOTWAT, while 14 of 20 explicitly include WTRHTR (water heater) in the unit, which argues against maintenance-fee hot water being provided.
Internet inclusion is explicitly confirmed in the remarks, including the phrase "Maintenance fees include sewer, water, cable, and internet" and another listing saying "Internet and Cable included." Even though only 4 of 20 MLS records currently flag INTSER, the direct remark evidence is enough to support this as a building feature. This may indicate inconsistent checkbox use across agents.
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is very strongly confirmed. One public remark explicitly says "Maintenance fees include sewer," and the MLS data is consistent at 18 of 20 listings. This is high-confidence building-level evidence.
Water inclusion is very strongly confirmed. A public remark explicitly says "Maintenance fees include... water," and the MLS checkbox pattern is highly consistent at 18 of 20 listings. This appears to be a genuine building-level inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is strongly supported across the remarks and appears in numerous listings from different agents, not just a single copy-paste description. At least 8-10 listings explicitly mention storage via phrases like 'large Storage Unit,' 'assigned extra storage space,' 'additional storage space,' 'spacious attic for addtl storage,' and 'includes storage in the easily accessible attic,' confirming the building offers storage units/lockers or equivalent extra storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no explicit remark evidence for a trash chute in any of the provided listings. Mentions of "trash rooms" and daily trash pickup suggest a different service, while the lone MLS checkbox appearance (1/20) is too weak to trust and appears inconsistent with the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly confirmed for this building. Across many listings, multiple agents explicitly mention shared amenity access with phrases like "pool," "community pool," "onsite pool," and "sparkling 60 foot pool." The evidence is consistent across remarks and aligns with the strong MLS history, so this should remain included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence confirms in-unit laundry across the building. Multiple listings explicitly mention washer/dryer in the unit, including 'Washer/Dryer in the unit,' 'full-size washer and dryer,' 'new LG stacked washer and dryer,' and 'new washer/dryer,' showing consistent confirmation from many listings rather than a one-off agent note.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is strongly confirmed across the building. Multiple remarks mention "1 dedicated parking spot," "1 open parking," "1 assigned parking stall," "2 assigned parking stalls," "2 parking," and "covered parking," showing the feature appears in many listings rather than a one-off note. Current MLS data also supports this with 20/20 listings showing parking features and 0/20 showing NONE.
Assigned parking is strongly supported across the listings. At least 12 listings explicitly mention assigned, dedicated, reserved, or deeded parking, and the MLS checkbox pattern (18/20) matches the remarks closely. This appears to be consistent building-level information rather than a one-off agent error.
Covered parking is only explicitly mentioned once in the remarks, but the phrase 'covered parking' is clear and direct. Because the MLS data now shows one listing with a covered-parking code, this may reflect a legitimate building feature available in some units or stalls. The evidence is suggestive rather than broad, so confidence is moderate.
I searched for deeded or owned-parking language like "deeded parking" or "parking stall included in deed" and found none. The listings consistently describe parking as assigned or dedicated, which is not the same as deeded ownership.
No analysis available
I looked for any parking-specific cost language, including monthly charges, rental fees, or extra parking costs, and found nothing. The remarks only describe parking as assigned, dedicated, or covered, without mentioning a separate fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like "parking waitlist," "parking waiting list," or instructions to join a parking list and found no evidence. The listings describe parking availability directly instead of implying a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is direct evidence that the building has split AC in some units. At least 1 listing explicitly says "new Mitsubishi split A/C unit" and another states "board approved split AC units installed." Because this is a building-level feature that can appear in only some units, these explicit remarks are enough to include it even though most other listings mention window AC instead.
Window AC is strongly supported. Multiple current remarks explicitly say "window AC," "new window AC," and "window air conditioners," across different listings and agents, which aligns with the historical MLS inclusion data (13/20). This appears to be a consistent building feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
Concrete construction is supported by current MLS data rather than the public remarks: 9 of 20 listings explicitly show CONCRE in construction_materials. The remarks across the listings focus on unit features and amenities and do not contradict concrete construction, but they also do not independently confirm it. This looks like repeated MLS data from multiple agents rather than a remark-based claim.
Across the provided remarks, 0 listings explicitly mention double wall construction. Although some MLS records currently mark DOUWAL, the public descriptions do not confirm it, so the evidence looks like unverified MLS checkbox data rather than consistent agent-reported construction details.
Across the provided remarks, 0 listings explicitly mention hollow tile or hollow tile construction. The evidence does not support keeping this feature, and the remarks read like generic copy-paste descriptions of interiors and amenities rather than construction materials.
Across the 20 remarks, 0 listings explicitly mention masonry/stucco construction. The current text focuses on unit updates, views, and building amenities, which suggests the MLS material checkbox may be unreliable here.
No analysis available
Several listings (4/20) specify SLAB as a construction material, and one listing notes "known structural issues and foundation settlement," which aligns with slab-type foundations. While not explicitly described in remarks as a concrete slab, the MLS pattern and foundation reference indicate that at least part of the project is built on a slab foundation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
About 8 of 20 MLS entries currently identify the building as above ground, and several remarks reinforce that idea by calling it an "elevated mid-rise building" and a "low rise building" perched on the hillside. While not every listing says it directly, the pattern across multiple agents supports the feature with solid confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for short-term rental clues like NUC, TVU, vacation rental, nightly rental, or minimum-stay exceptions and found none. With no public evidence that STR is allowed, this is treated as not indicated by the remarks.
I looked for hotel pool references such as hotel rental program, managed by hotel, or brand pool participation and found none. Since there is also no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed, this must remain false.
I searched for wording like "required to participate," "cannot opt out," or "must be in rental program" and found nothing. There is no public remark evidence of any mandatory hotel or rental pool arrangement.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold wording such as "lease expires," "ground lease," or any 4-digit lease-end year and found nothing. The one explicit tenure reference says "fee simple," so there is no public evidence of a leasehold expiry date.
I searched the listings for explicit VA-loan language such as "VA approved" or "VA financing accepted" and found none. With no public evidence supporting VA approval, this remains unconfirmed and is treated as not indicated by the remarks.
I searched for signs of full HOA insurance coverage, including 'fully insured,' 'fully covered,' and 'walls-in coverage,' but found no direct match. The only insurance-related text refers to a special assessment for AOAO insurance premiums, which does not establish that the building is fully insured.
No analysis available
I looked for terms like fire/life safety evaluation passed, FLSE, fire safety certified, and passed fire inspection, but found none. The remarks instead mention unrelated items like pre-inspection, structural issues, and insurance assessments, which do not confirm a passed fire/life safety evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are strongly supported across the listing set. Well over a dozen remarks explicitly reference 'ocean view(s)' or similar language such as 'partial Ocean,' 'sweeping ocean views,' and 'breathtaking Kahala ocean views,' coming from multiple listings and agents. The evidence is consistent and widespread, so view_ocean should be treated as present for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
City views have moderate support, with at least one explicit remark calling out a "GREAT OPEN VIEW of City" alongside partial ocean views. The MLS data also shows CITY in 7/20 listings, suggesting the feature appears in some units, though the evidence is not as strong or repeated as for ocean views. This looks plausible, but may be more limited to certain stacks or elevations.
No analysis available
Several listings describe garden-oriented surroundings, including "lush garden entry," "backyard with trees, plants and nature," and other references to a landscaped, nature-rich setting. While the MLS view descriptions are mixed, the repeated remarks across multiple agents suggest garden views are available in at least some units rather than being a one-off copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across 20 recent listings, zero mention 'sunset', 'western exposure', or similar (MLS view_descriptions: 0/20 SUNSET, 4/20 NONE). The public remarks repeatedly cite 'ocean views', 'Diamond Head', and 'city views' but contain no phrases like 'sunset view' or 'evening sun', indicating no evidence of sunset views in multiple agent listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence is very strong that Waialae Gardens has a resident/on-site manager. Multiple current remarks explicitly mention it in plain language—e.g. "resident manager," "on-site manager," and "helpful resident manager"—across several different listings, not just one agent's copy-paste. This aligns with the prior high-confidence MLS amenity data and reinforces that the feature is present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.