Waialae Gardens
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Waialae Gardens
Building Overview
Waialae Gardens in Waialae-Kahala — 1972 concrete building with ocean views, pool and resident manager.
About Waialae Gardens
Waialae Gardens is a residential building located in the Waialae-Kahala neighborhood. According to available records the building was constructed in 1972 using concrete. Specific building size or unit count is not provided in the MLS data.
Key amenities reported in the MLS include an on-site pool and a resident manager. Units are noted to have window air conditioning and the building offers ocean views as a feature of some residences.
Parking is available and assigned. Pets and short-term rentals are not permitted per the MLS listing. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit owner-occupancy clues, including percentages and phrases like majority owner occupied, but found none. A few units are described as tenant occupied or ideal for investment, but that does not establish the building's overall owner-occupancy rate.
I searched the remarks for explicit elevator counts and only found generic references to an elevator as a building amenity. Because the listings do not provide a number, I cannot determine how many elevators the building has from the remarks alone.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable inclusion is strongly supported across the building. Current MLS data shows 16 of 20 listings with CABTV, and at least one remark explicitly states 'Cable included' / 'Maintenance fees include... cable'. This looks like consistent building-level information rather than a one-off agent error.
Common-area electricity is supported by a strong MLS pattern, though the public remarks do not explicitly call it out. With 15 of 20 recent listings marking OTCOEX, this appears to be a building-level fee inclusion that agents may be copying consistently.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water inclusion is not supported. The MLS pattern is very clear: 0 of 20 listings show HOTWAT, while 14 of 20 explicitly include WTRHTR (water heater) in the unit, which argues against maintenance-fee hot water being provided.
Internet inclusion is explicitly confirmed in the remarks, including the phrase "Maintenance fees include sewer, water, cable, and internet" and another listing saying "Internet and Cable included." Even though only 4 of 20 MLS records currently flag INTSER, the direct remark evidence is enough to support this as a building feature. This may indicate inconsistent checkbox use across agents.
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is strongly confirmed. Current MLS data shows 17 of 20 listings including SEWER, and the remarks directly say maintenance fees include sewer. This is consistent across sources and appears to be true building-level data.
Water inclusion is strongly confirmed. Current MLS data shows 17 of 20 listings with WATER, and the remarks directly confirm that water is included in maintenance fees. This is high-confidence building-level evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is strongly supported across the remarks and appears in numerous listings from different agents, not just a single copy-paste description. At least 8-10 listings explicitly mention storage via phrases like 'large Storage Unit,' 'assigned extra storage space,' 'additional storage space,' 'spacious attic for addtl storage,' and 'includes storage in the easily accessible attic,' confirming the building offers storage units/lockers or equivalent extra storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no explicit remark evidence for a trash chute in any of the provided listings. Mentions of "trash rooms" and daily trash pickup suggest a different service, while the lone MLS checkbox appearance (1/20) is too weak to trust and appears inconsistent with the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly confirmed for this building. Across many listings, agents explicitly describe a shared amenity, with remarks such as "pool," "community pool," "sparkling 60 foot pool," and "take a dip" appearing in multiple listings. The current remarks match the historical MLS pattern (18/20 listings showing pool-related amenities), so this is high-confidence building-level evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence confirms in-unit laundry across the building. Multiple listings explicitly mention washer/dryer in unit, including phrases like "washer/dryer in the unit," "full-size washer and dryer," "new LG stacked washer and dryer," and "new washer/dryer." The consistency across many listings suggests this is a real building feature, not copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence that the building offers parking. Across the provided remarks, parking is mentioned in many listings and appears in both MLS data and agent remarks, including phrases like "1 Open Parking," "1 dedicated parking stall," "1 parking stall," and "2 parking." This is consistent across multiple agents and is not just a one-off mention.
Assigned parking is strongly supported across the listings. At least 12 listings explicitly mention assigned, dedicated, reserved, or deeded parking, and the MLS checkbox pattern (18/20) matches the remarks closely. This appears to be consistent building-level information rather than a one-off agent error.
Covered parking is only explicitly mentioned once in the remarks, but the phrase 'covered parking' is clear and direct. Because the MLS data now shows one listing with a covered-parking code, this may reflect a legitimate building feature available in some units or stalls. The evidence is suggestive rather than broad, so confidence is moderate.
I searched for deeded/owned parking language such as 'deeded parking' or 'parking stall included in deed' and did not find it. The listings consistently describe assigned, dedicated, or covered parking, which does not prove deeded ownership.
No analysis available
I looked for parking rental, monthly parking charges, or any dollar amount tied specifically to parking and found none. The remarks mention parking stalls, but not a separate parking fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for 'parking waitlist,' 'waiting list,' or similar language and found nothing. There is no public remark evidence that parking is managed through a waitlist.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is strongly supported. Multiple current remarks explicitly say "window AC," "new window AC," and "window air conditioners," across different listings and agents, which aligns with the historical MLS inclusion data (13/20). This appears to be a consistent building feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
Concrete construction is supported by current MLS data rather than the public remarks: 9 of 20 listings explicitly show CONCRE in construction_materials. The remarks across the listings focus on unit features and amenities and do not contradict concrete construction, but they also do not independently confirm it. This looks like repeated MLS data from multiple agents rather than a remark-based claim.
A subset of MLS listings (4/20) mark DOUWAL in the construction materials field, and none contradict this in the remarks. This implies that at least some of the Waialae Gardens buildings or unit types use double-wall construction, even though agents do not describe it in narrative remarks.
Across the provided remarks, 0 listings explicitly mention hollow tile or hollow tile construction. The evidence does not support adding this feature based on current public remarks, and it does not appear to be a repeated agent description.
Only 4 of 20 MLS entries currently mark masonry/stucco, and 0 public remarks explicitly use those words. Because the remarks do not corroborate the MLS checkbox, this is moderate-confidence only and could reflect inconsistent agent input.
No analysis available
Several listings (4/20) specify SLAB as a construction material, and one listing notes "known structural issues and foundation settlement," which aligns with slab-type foundations. While not explicitly described in remarks as a concrete slab, the MLS pattern and foundation reference indicate that at least part of the project is built on a slab foundation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
About 8 of 20 MLS entries currently identify the building as above ground, and several remarks reinforce that idea by calling it an "elevated mid-rise building" and a "low rise building" perched on the hillside. While not every listing says it directly, the pattern across multiple agents supports the feature with solid confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR indicators such as Airbnb, vacation rental, NUC, TVU, nightly rentals, or minimum-stay rules and found none. Based on the remarks alone, short-term rental allowance is not evidenced.
I looked for hotel pool language like 'hotel rental pool,' 'managed by hotel,' or brand pool references and found none. Since STR is not evidenced as allowed, hotel-pool participation is also not supported by the remarks.
I searched for wording such as 'required to participate,' 'cannot opt out,' or 'must be in rental program' and found nothing. With no evidence of any STR/hotel pool program, mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold wording such as 'lease expires,' 'ground lease,' or a 4-digit lease-end year and found nothing. The remarks read like a fee-simple property, but there is no explicit lease-expiry year to extract.
I searched the remarks for any VA-loan language and found none. With no public evidence indicating VA approval, this remains unconfirmed and is treated as not evidenced from the remarks.
I searched for wording that would indicate full HOA insurance coverage, including "fully insured" or "walls-in," and found no explicit match. One listing mentions a special assessment for insurance premiums, which suggests insurance activity but does not confirm full coverage.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation, such as FLSE, fire safety certified, or passed fire inspection, and found nothing. The remarks mention pre-inspection and insurance-related items, but those are not the same as an FLSE pass.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are strongly supported across the listing set. Well over a dozen remarks explicitly reference 'ocean view(s)' or similar language such as 'partial Ocean,' 'sweeping ocean views,' and 'breathtaking Kahala ocean views,' coming from multiple listings and agents. The evidence is consistent and widespread, so view_ocean should be treated as present for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
City views have moderate support, with at least one explicit remark calling out a "GREAT OPEN VIEW of City" alongside partial ocean views. The MLS data also shows CITY in 7/20 listings, suggesting the feature appears in some units, though the evidence is not as strong or repeated as for ocean views. This looks plausible, but may be more limited to certain stacks or elevations.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across 20 recent listings, zero mention 'sunset', 'western exposure', or similar (MLS view_descriptions: 0/20 SUNSET, 4/20 NONE). The public remarks repeatedly cite 'ocean views', 'Diamond Head', and 'city views' but contain no phrases like 'sunset view' or 'evening sun', indicating no evidence of sunset views in multiple agent listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence is very strong that Waialae Gardens has a resident/on-site manager. Multiple current listings explicitly mention "resident manager" or "on-site manager," and the historical MLS data was already high confidence with 15/20 listings showing RESMAN. This appears consistent across several agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.