Village on the Green 2A
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Village on the Green 2A
Building Overview
Village on the Green 2A in Waipahu — built 1998, wood frame construction; covered assigned parking; no pets or short-term rentals.
About Village on the Green 2A
Based on MLS data, Village on the Green 2A is a residential building located in the Waipahu neighborhood. According to available records the building was built in 1998 and is of wood frame construction.
Key features noted in the MLS records include on-site parking that is available, covered, and assigned. The listing data also indicates that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted.
Additional administrative details such as the property management company are listed as unknown in the MLS data. Buyers should verify parking arrangements, policies, and any applicable fees or condominium rules with the association or their agent, as this summary is based solely on available MLS information.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox evidence: 5/8 listings list OTCOEX (common area electricity) in association_fee_includes. None of the public remarks mention 'common area electricity', 'building power included', or similar phrases. The MLS prevalence suggests the building likely includes common electric in fees but the lack of remarks means the evidence is moderate and possibly due to agents copying checkboxes.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across 7 listings, none list hot water as part of the association/maintenance fee, and 6 explicitly include individual water heaters (WTRHTR), implying each unit heats its own water. Public remarks do not mention hot water being included in HOA fees or as a building-provided utility. Together, this strongly supports that hot water is not included in the maintenance fee for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox evidence: 5/8 listings include SEWER in association_fee_includes. Public remarks across the provided listings do not state 'sewer included' or 'sewer in HOA fees'. The feature is likely based on MLS entries but is not corroborated in agent remarks, so confidence is moderate and could reflect checkbox copy/paste.
MLS checkbox evidence: 6/8 listings list WATER in association_fee_includes. None of the public remarks explicitly mention 'water included' or similar. The higher MLS prevalence gives somewhat stronger implied evidence than the other fees, but absence of explicit remarks means confidence remains below high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 of 8 public remarks mention any car wash or vehicle-wash facility. The MLS amenity CRWSH is checked in 2 of 8 current listings, but there are no remarks like 'car wash' or 'auto wash' describing installation or availability. Given the absence of corroborating remarks and no historical confidence, the checked boxes appear to be agent copy/paste errors, so the building is not being treated as offering a car wash.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 3 listings explicitly mention patios/decks: 'private outdoor lanai', 'large 93 sq. ft. lanai', and 'Small backyard and patio'. MLS checkbox data also shows PATDEC/COVPAT on 4 of 8 listings. Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks (not solely a single copy/paste), so the building should be listed as offering patio/deck amenities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Three separate listings reference private yard space: 'fenced-in yard', 'very spacious enclosed yard', and 'Small backyard and patio'. MLS amenity checks (3/8) align with remarks, and the descriptions come from multiple listings rather than a single copy/paste, supporting inclusion of private yard as a building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least one listing's public remarks explicitly states 'the unit also has two outdoor storage closets.' Additionally, 3 of 8 listings have STORAG in unit_features (while 0 of 8 list storage in building amenities). Evidence indicates some units offer storage lockers/closets; mentions are limited to a subset of listings and may reflect unit-level storage rather than a building-level locker room.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple recent MLS listings (7/8) list washer/dryer in the inclusions, and at least one public remark explicitly states "Washer and dryer in unit for added convenience." Evidence is strong across listings and is corroborated by agent remarks, indicating the building offers in-unit laundry in some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence that the building offers parking: 8/8 current listings have parking_features set (OPEN/OP1/OP2/OP3PLUS/COVERE/GARAGE/ASSIGN/etc.), and public remarks repeatedly state 'two assigned parking stalls', 'two-car garage', 'attached ... two-car garage', and '2 parking stalls'. Evidence is strong across multiple agents and listings.
Multiple listings describe reserved parking, including '2 assigned, parking stalls', 'two deeded parking stalls', and 'TWO ASSIGNED PARKING'. With 5/7 MLS entries marked ASSIGN, the evidence strongly supports that this building offers assigned/deeded parking stalls. This pattern appears across different units and agents, not just a single listing.
Multiple listings and remarks confirm covered parking: 7/8 listings have covered/garage parking_features and remarks include phrases like 'two-car garage', 'attached ... two-car garage', and 'one covered, one open'. Coverage is confirmed across several units and agents.
Several listings explicitly reference deeded parking (e.g., 'Unit comes with two deeded parking stalls' and 'two deeded parking stalls'), providing strong evidence that the parking stalls are deeded with the unit.
No analysis available
I searched for references to monthly parking fees or additional parking charges but found none; listings describe assigned/deeded stalls and garages without any fee information, so monthly parking fee is unknown from these remarks.
MLS checkbox data suggests guest parking (5/8 listings include GUEST in parking_features), but public remarks provided do not explicitly mention 'guest' or 'visitor' parking. Inclusion is based on MLS flags and should be treated as probable but not strongly confirmed in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for indications of limited parking and a waiting list (phrases like 'parking waitlist' or 'waiting list') but found none; listings describe assigned or deeded stalls, so there is no evidence of a waitlist.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 7 listings explicitly mention split or ductless AC; the only AC references are generic (e.g., 'AC in living room', 'There is an AC unit in the living room') without specifying mini-split systems. Although 2 of 7 listings check the ACSPL box, the lack of corroborating remarks suggests these are likely copy/paste or checkbox errors, so the building is not reliably offered or marketed with split AC units. Based on this, split AC should not be treated as a building feature at this time.
5 of 8 current listings check the ACWIUN inclusion and at least two separate listing remarks explicitly note 'AC in living room.' While agents sometimes copy/paste checklist items, the explicit mentions across multiple listings indicate that some units in the building do have window/room AC units, so the building should be listed as offering window AC.
No analysis available
No public remarks (0 of 8 provided listings) mention double wall or "double-wall" construction. The MLS currently has DOUWAL checked on several listings (5/8), but with no corroborating agent remarks or owner/site-visit verification, the evidence is weak and suggests the checkbox may be inaccurate or unverified.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Five of seven recent MLS listings for Village on the Green indicate wood frame construction via the WOOFRA checkbox. Although none of the public remarks explicitly say ‘wood frame construction,’ there is no conflicting information, and the structure type fits common wood-frame townhome construction in this area. Taken together, this provides moderately strong evidence the building is wood frame.
No public remarks (0 of 8 provided listings) reference above-ground construction or "above ground" materials. While multiple MLS entries currently check ABOGRO (4/8), the lack of any explicit mention in agent remarks or owner verification makes this feature unsubstantiated for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit language permitting short-term rentals or indicating transient/vacation rental status. The remarks focus on residential use, assigned/deeded parking, and community amenities, with no mention of STRs, so STR allowance cannot be confirmed and is treated as not allowed based on lack of evidence.
Because there is no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed, and no listings reference a hotel rental pool or hotel-managed program, hotel rental pool participation is not applicable and is marked false with high confidence.
There is no evidence of a hotel rental pool or any mandatory participation in a rental program. Given STRs are not mentioned, mandatory pool participation is not applicable and is set to false with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for language such as 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'leasehold', or a four-digit lease expiry year. None of the listings reference leasehold status or a lease expiration year, so the lease expiry is unknown from these remarks.
I searched the public remarks for explicit references to VA approval or VA financing (phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', 'VA loans accepted'). There are no such mentions in any listing, so VA approval cannot be confirmed from the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 of 8 current listings include GARDEN in the view_descriptions and 2 of 8 explicitly list NONE. Across all public remarks there is no mention of 'garden', 'courtyard', or 'landscaped' views—comments reference 'private outdoor lanai', 'fenced-in yard', 'small backyard', and 'tree top views' instead. Given the lack of any garden/courtyard language and MLS checkboxes showing no garden views, confidence is high that the building does not have garden views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 7 analyzed listings include sunrise or eastern exposure in the MLS view descriptions, and 2 explicitly note the view as "NONE." Remarks reference only generic or treetop views (e.g., "tree top views"), with no mention of sunrise or morning sun, suggesting the building is not recognized for sunrise views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.