Village on the Green 1B
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Village on the Green 1B
Building Overview
Village on the Green 1B in Waipahu — built 1995; pets allowed; short-term rentals not permitted.
About Village on the Green 1B
Based on MLS data, Village on the Green 1B is a condominium community located in Waipahu. According to available records the building was built in 1995. Size and construction type are not listed in the provided MLS information.
Key policies and features reported in the MLS include that pets are allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The MLS does not specify onsite amenities, common area features, or other building services.
The MLS data does not identify a management company, nor does it provide details on parking, maintenance fees, or special assessments. Buyers should verify all specifics, including unit size, construction details, amenity availability, parking arrangements, association rules, and fees, with the listing agent or the condominium association.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The public remarks explicitly state a 75% owner-occupancy rate for the complex, so I use that value. This is taken directly from the listing language and reported with high confidence.
I searched the remarks for any explicit mention of elevators (e.g., '4 elevators', 'multiple elevators', 'elevator') but found none. Because there is no prior numeric value and no explicit mention in the remarks, the number of elevators is unknown and left as null.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
4 of 5 current listings include the OTCOEX MLS code suggesting common area electricity is included. No public remarks explicitly state 'common area electricity' or similar, so the support is based on MLS checkbox data across multiple listings and appears implied rather than directly confirmed in agent remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 5 listings include WTRHTR in inclusions and none include HOTWAT in association fee codes; one remark explicitly lists a 'water heater' as part of the unit. This strongly indicates hot water is provided by in-unit heaters and not included in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 5 current listings have the SEWER association_fee_includes code, indicating sewer is included in HOA fees across listings. No agent remarks explicitly say 'sewer included', so the evidence is MLS-derived and therefore given moderate (implied) confidence.
All 5 listings contain the WATER association_fee_includes code, suggesting water is included in maintenance fees. Because agent remarks do not explicitly confirm 'water included,' the determination relies on consistent MLS flags and is given moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks do not include 'clubhouse', 'club house' or 'community center'. With only 1/5 MLS listings reportedly checking the clubhouse amenity and no supporting language in the public remarks, this appears to be an unsupported MLS checkbox rather than a confirmed building clubhouse.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No mention of 'meeting room', 'conference room', 'board room', or similar in the public remarks. Given agents sometimes check MLS amenity boxes without remarks to back them up (only 1/5 listings have the checkbox), there is insufficient evidence to mark a meeting room as present.
MLS checkbox data shows 3 of 5 listings indicating patio/deck amenities, and at least one listing's remarks explicitly state a 'lanai'. However, most public remarks do not describe patios or covered patios, suggesting incomplete agent remarks or copy/paste. Evidence is moderate across agents (MLS checks + one explicit mention), so patio/deck is included with implied confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listings' remarks explicitly mention unit-level private yard features: 'private fenced yard', 'private court yard', and 'large private yard' appear in separate listing blocks. Though MLS checkbox use is limited (2/5), the repeated explicit descriptions from multiple agent listings indicate the building offers private yard spaces for at least some units, so include private_yard with high confidence.
Remarks reference nearby Waikele golf course but do not state the building has a 'putting green' or 'practice putting green'. With only one MLS listing checking PUTGRE and no supporting language across the public remarks, there is weak evidence for an on-site putting green.
No analysis available
No listings' remarks mention a recreation room, rec room, game room, or similar. The provided public remarks reference an HOA community pool and nearby Waikele golf course but contain no phrases like 'recreation room' or 'game room' across the listing, suggesting the single MLS checkbox (1/5 listings) is likely a copy-paste; evidence is weak.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple MLS entries indicate storage: 2 of 5 listings checked STORAG/ADDLVSTORAG in amenities and 3 of 5 checked STORAG in unit_features. Public remarks include an explicit line noting "washer/dryer, extra storage and it’s own private court yard," supporting that some units/building offer additional storage. Evidence is consistent across several listings but not ubiquitous, so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Three of five current MLS listings have the pool amenity checked, and at least one listing remark explicitly states 'HOA community pool,' confirming a building/shared pool. While agent copy/paste is possible, the combination of multiple MLS checks and an explicit remark provides strong evidence that the building offers a pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 5 current MLS listings list WASHER/DRYER in the inclusions and several public remarks explicitly mention in-unit machines, including "new washer/dryer installed in Oct. 2021" and repeated "washer/dryer" references. This feature is described across multiple listings (not just a single ad), so it appears to be a building-level offering rather than a single-unit anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All listings indicate parking is available (MLS shows OPEN/CO/GARAGE codes for 5/5). Public remarks repeatedly note '2 parking', '2 parking stalls', and stalls in front of the unit, so building-level parking is clearly offered across units.
Both MLS checkbox data (ASSIGN on 5/5 listings) and remarks explicitly state assigned stalls ('two assigned parking stalls'), indicating reserved/assigned parking is provided.
MLS shows covered/garage parking for all listings and remarks explicitly describe '1 covered, 1 open' stalls, confirming the building offers covered parking (garage/carport/covered stalls).
The listing explicitly notes assigned parking stalls, but there is no wording indicating parking is deeded/owned. In absence of an explicit 'deeded' statement, parking_deeded is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
Searched the remarks for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', or similar. No information provided about any parking fee, so the monthly parking fee is unknown from the public remarks.
MLS indicates guest parking in most listings (4/5) and remarks explicitly mention 'guest parking stalls are available', supporting inclusion of guest/visitor parking for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Looked for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list', or similar phrasing. There is no mention of a waitlist, so parking_waitlist is assumed false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (at least 4) explicitly mention window or multiple AC units: quotes include "window A/C units", "Multiple window AC units", and "newer 3 AC units". The MLS inclusion ACWIUN is checked on 4 of 5 listings and public remarks from different listings consistently reference window/split AC, indicating strong evidence that some units in the building have window AC units.
No analysis available
No listings' public remarks include phrases like 'double wall' or 'double-wall construction'. MLS shows DOUWAL checked in 4 of 5 listings but without any supporting remarks; given the lack of descriptive confirmation across agents, the evidence that the building actually has double-wall construction is weak.
No analysis available
No listings' public remarks mention masonry or stucco (search terms 'masonry', 'stucco', 'masonry and stucco' not found). MLS construction_materials currently has MASSTU in 1 of 5 listings, but with no corroborating agent remarks this appears inconsistent and likely copy/paste; evidence is weak across multiple agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched the public remarks for explicit statements about STR allowance or restrictions. There is no STR information provided, so STR allowance is assumed false (no evidence of STR being permitted) with medium confidence.
Looked for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel program', or hotel brand management statements. None were found. Because STR is not indicated as allowed, hotel pool participation is set to false.
Searched for 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or any language about compulsory rental programs. No such language appears in the remarks, so str_mandatory_pool is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'leasehold expiring', or a 4-digit expiry year. There is no reference to leasehold or lease expiry in the public remarks, so the lease expiry year is unknown.
The remarks explicitly reference a VA assumable loan, which is strong evidence of VA-related financing being available for this listing. This was taken as indication of VA loan approval/availability for the property.
I searched the remarks for explicit statements that the HOA/building provides full (walls-in) insurance or is fully insured and found none. Because there is no current value and no mention in the remarks, I report false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit language indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation (FLSE) or similar certifications and found no such statements. With no current value and no mention in the remarks, I report false with medium confidence (absence of mention suggests it is likely not stated publicly).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Majority of current MLS records (3 of 5) indicate garden views, and the public remarks repeatedly reference outdoor/landscaped features: "private fenced yard", "private court yard", "nice green space between buildings" and "lush landscaping." Evidence is present across multiple listings/agents and consistently describes yard or courtyard views, so the building should be marked as offering garden views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Two of five current MLS listings for this building include the RESMAN amenity checkbox, but none of the public remarks mention a resident or on-site manager (no phrases like 'resident manager' or 'on-site manager'). This is moderate, indirect evidence (likely agent-entered amenity data) so the feature is included as potentially available but with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.