Village on the Green 1A
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Village on the Green 1A
Building Overview
Village on the Green 1A in Waipahu — concrete construction, built 1995; pets and short-term rentals not allowed (based on MLS data).
About Village on the Green 1A
Based on MLS data, Village on the Green 1A is located in the Waipahu neighborhood and was built in 1995. The building is noted as concrete construction. Size and unit count are not provided in the available MLS records.
According to available records, specific on-site amenities and common-area features are not listed in the MLS data. The property’s construction type (concrete) and year built are provided, but amenity details such as pools, fitness centers, or community spaces are not included in the source data.
MLS data indicate that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS record. Additional details such as parking, maintenance fees, homeowner association rules, and other policies are not specified in the provided data. Buyers should verify all property specifics, rules, and fees with the listing agent or management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for any owner-occupancy indicators such as percentages or phrases like "majority owner occupied," but found nothing. Because this is a numeric field and the remarks provide no explicit percentage, the value cannot be determined from the listings.
I searched the public remarks for any elevator references, but none were included. Because this is a numeric field and the remarks do not provide explicit evidence, the elevator count remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
15 of 20 current listings include OTCOEX, suggesting common area electricity is part of the maintenance fee. Public remarks do not explicitly call out common electric/common area electricity, so the evidence is moderate and appears driven by MLS consistency rather than agent descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings list HOTWAT in association_fee_includes (0/19) while 16/19 include WTRHTR and remarks mention individual water heaters/solar water heater and a replaced water heater. Strong evidence across listings that hot water is unit-supplied and not included in maintenance fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 20 current listings include SEWER in association_fee_includes. No remarks contradict sewer being HOA-covered, and the agreement is consistent across multiple listings/agents, making this very strong evidence.
All 20 current listings include WATER in association_fee_includes. Public remarks do not dispute water being HOA-covered, and the multi-listing agreement is strong across agents, so confidence is very high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks mention a car wash facility in any of the listings reviewed. The feature appears only as a sparse MLS checkbox signal, which is weak evidence and may reflect copy-paste or unverified data rather than an actual building amenity.
At least one remark explicitly mentions a "community center with pool" and other listings note the community "provides a pool," supporting the presence of a clubhouse/community center. This explicit language from multiple listings (though from few agents) provides strong evidence for including the clubhouse feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS shows 1/18 listings checked for a putting green, but none of the public remarks reference a putting or practice green. The building is adjacent to a golf course (several remarks mention golf course frontage), which may have led some agents to check the box; however there is no direct remark confirming a putting green on-site.
Recreation area is supported by multiple listings and prior high-confidence MLS data. Remarks explicitly mention a "community center with pool" and community/planned-development amenities, which aligns with a shared recreation amenity available to residents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Although one MLS listing has WHIRLP checked, none of the public remarks mention a whirlpool/hot tub/jacuzzi/spa. No agents explicitly describe a spa amenity, so there is insufficient corroboration to mark this building as offering a whirlpool.
Pool appears to be a genuine community amenity for this building/community. It is explicitly mentioned in 2 current remarks and the MLS checkbox is still present in 9 of 20 current listings, which supports that this is not just a one-off copy/paste error. The historical record was also positive, so the evidence aligns across past and current listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence supports in-unit laundry. Across the remarks, multiple listings explicitly mention washer/dryer in the unit or within the unit's garage space, and one says a "large stacked stainless steel washer/dryer located in the unit." This aligns with the current MLS pattern of 18/20 listings including washer/dryer, so this appears to be a consistent feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly available at this building. Across the remarks, many listings mention dedicated stalls, garages, driveway parking, or other on-site parking; this aligns with the current MLS data showing parking on all 20/20 listings and no 'NONE' entries. The evidence is strong and appears consistent across multiple agents rather than copy-paste noise.
Multiple listings for Village on the Green repeatedly state unit-specific parking: phrases include "two dedicated parking stalls", "two parking stalls located right in front of your unit", and "enclosed 2-car garage plus two open driveway parking." At least 14 of 19 listing remarks reference parking stalls/garage assigned to the unit, and MLS checkbox shows ASSIGN on some listings (6/19), indicating building units generally have assigned/reserved stalls. Evidence is consistent across many agent remarks rather than a single copy/paste.
Covered parking is well supported for this building. Multiple remarks explicitly describe garages or covered stalls, and the current MLS data shows 18/20 listings with covered/garage-type parking features. This is consistent across several listings and looks reliable.
I looked for wording such as deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in deed. The listings describe parking availability, but nothing indicates the stalls are deeded to the unit.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee language such as monthly parking charge, parking rental, or additional cost for stalls. The remarks only discuss the number and type of parking spaces, not any fee.
Guest parking appears to be available in the building/community, though not every listing mentions it. About 12 of 20 MLS records include guest parking, and multiple remarks independently reference guest stalls or nearby guest parking. The evidence is solid, but slightly less universal than basic parking or covered parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to parking waitlists, joining a list, or limited assigned parking. The remarks instead emphasize readily available stalls and garages, with no waitlist language.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
11 of 18 current MLS listings include the ACSPL checkbox and at least four separate public remarks explicitly mention split/ductless systems with phrases like "split AC units", "2 split AC systems", and "efficient split AC system". A few other listings mention AC without specifying type (e.g., "window AC units" or "AC units in bedrooms"), but the combination of multiple agent remarks and the majority of MLS checkboxes provides strong, building-level evidence that some units have split (ductless) AC systems.
13 of 19 current MLS listings include ACWIUN in inclusions, and at least one remark explicitly states "Equipped with window AC units for added comfort." Several other listings note AC in living/bedrooms or split AC systems, showing AC presence across multiple units rather than a single isolated listing. Evidence indicates the building offers window AC units in some units and is consistent across multiple agents/listings.
No public remarks explicitly mention concrete, reinforced concrete, or a concrete building. While 8/20 current MLS records have CONCRE, the lack of supporting remarks across multiple agents suggests weak evidence and possible copy/paste data entry rather than a confirmed construction type.
Double-wall construction is strongly supported by the MLS checkbox data, with 19/20 current listings marked DOUWAL. The absence of remarks is not concerning here because the MLS pattern is overwhelmingly consistent across listings and agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Wood-frame construction is supported by the MLS pattern, with 14/20 current listings checked for WOOFRA. The remarks do not spell it out, so this is inferred from the building-level MLS data rather than explicit agent descriptions.
Above-ground construction is not supported by the public remarks, and only 6/20 current listings have ABOGRO checked. That weak, inconsistent pattern suggests this is likely not a reliable building-level feature for buyers.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental language such as STR allowed, NUC, TVU, vacation rental, or 30-day minimum rules. None were found, so there is no public remark evidence that STR is allowed.
I looked for hotel rental pool references such as Hilton pool, Ritz pool, hotel-managed units, or rental program participation. There were no such mentions, and because STR is not evidenced, this must be false.
I searched for language indicating a required hotel pool or mandatory rental program. There are no public remarks suggesting any compulsory rental arrangement, so this is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like lease expiry, ground lease, leasehold, and renewal/extension years. The remarks do not mention any land lease term, so the expiry year remains unknown.
The remarks directly indicate VA financing is accepted and the building is VA approved. This is strong public evidence, so the feature is set to true with high confidence.
One of the remarks directly says the building is "100% insured," which is strong evidence of full HOA insurance coverage. This is an explicit statement from the listing remarks, so it overrides the absence of other insurance references.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit fire/life safety or fire inspection approval language, but the remarks do not mention any such certification or pass status. Since there is no evidence in the listings, this is treated as not established from the remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 7 listings' remarks explicitly advertise golf-course or fairway views (quotes include "bordering the second hole of Waikele Golf Course" and "overlooking the lush & serene fairways"). MLS view_descriptions also list GOLCOU on 4 of 18 records. Evidence is strong across multiple unit listings and agents, so the building should be marked as offering golf course views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no strong evidence that this building offers sunset views. Across the provided remarks, 0 listings explicitly mention sunset or western exposure, while many instead describe golf course or fairway views; current MLS data shows only 1 of 20 listings tagged SUNSET and 11 of 20 marked NONE, suggesting the sunset tag is likely a copy/paste or unchecked/checked inconsistency rather than a verified feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.