Village Maluhia
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Village Maluhia
Building Overview
Village Maluhia in Downtown-Chinatown offers a pool and ocean/mountain views.
About Village Maluhia
Village Maluhia is located in the Downtown–Chinatown neighborhood and was built in 1967. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete. Size and unit count are not provided in the MLS data.
The building's reported amenities include a pool, fitness center, BBQ area, and a resident manager. Units are noted as having window air conditioning. Views from the property are listed as ocean and mountain.
Parking is described as available, covered, and assigned. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all building details, rules, and any applicable fees with the managing agent or condominium association.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy figures like "80% owner occupied" or descriptive statements such as "majority owner occupied," but nothing appeared. The remarks mention owners, investors, and first-time buyers, yet those are not evidence of the building's owner-occupancy rate.
I found references to a secured lobby and elevator, plus one listing that says the building has elevators, but none of the remarks gave a specific number like "4 elevators" or "multiple elevators." Because this is a numeric field and no count was stated, I cannot infer the total from the remarks alone.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence that cable TV is included. One remark states, "Cable TV and internet are included in the maintenance fee," and the MLS shows CABTV in 16/20 recent listings. This looks consistent across multiple listings rather than a one-off agent error.
Evidence points away from common electricity being included. Remarks say, "Electricity expense is separately listed on the monthly maintenance fee statement" and "Electricity is sub-metered," which indicates power costs are not covered by the maintenance fee. The MLS checkbox data is inconsistent (11/20 OTCOEX), so this appears likely to be agent copy/paste noise rather than a building-wide benefit.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Present in several listings: although only 2/20 MLS checkboxes show GAS, there are explicit remarks noting "gas" is included with maintenance fees (phrases like "includes ... gas"). Evidence is less ubiquitous than water/sewer but explicit repeated mentions support inclusion at the building level.
Strong, repeated evidence indicates hot water is included in the maintenance fee. Historical MLS data shows HOTWAT in 15/20 listings, and multiple public remarks explicitly say 'Maintenance fee includes hot water' or similar phrasing. There is also one WTRHTR inclusion, but the overall pattern still strongly supports inclusion.
Internet inclusion is supported by at least one clear public remark stating 'Cable TV and internet are included in the maintenance fee!' Historical MLS data is weaker than water/sewer/hot water, with only 4/20 listings showing INTSER, so this appears present but not consistently copied into the MLS.
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is highly consistent across the building. The MLS data shows SEWER in 20/20 listings, and remarks repeatedly confirm it with phrases like 'Maintenance fee includes ... sewer.'
Water inclusion is highly consistent across the building. The MLS data shows WATER in 20/20 listings, and remarks explicitly confirm it with phrases like 'Maintenance fee includes ... water.'
The building clearly offers BBQ/grilling facilities. About 12+ remarks reference 'BBQ,' 'barbecue area,' or similar phrasing, and the amenity appears repeatedly alongside pool, sauna, and gym in different listings. This is strong cross-listing corroboration rather than isolated copy-paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Limited but present evidence: 2–3 listings explicitly mention 'clubhouse'/'club house' in agent remarks. Evidence is not widespread across listings, so inclusion is warranted for buyers but with moderate confidence; some agent copy/paste cannot be ruled out.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence supports an exercise room/fitness center. Across the remarks, roughly 10+ listings explicitly use phrases like 'exercise room,' 'gym,' 'fitness center,' 'workout room,' and 'weight room,' which is consistent with the high-confidence MLS data. The repeated wording across multiple listings suggests a real shared amenity rather than a one-off agent copy.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple unit remarks explicitly mention lanais/balconies—examples include "two private lanais," "private lanai," "screened lanai," and "covered lanai." At least 10 separate listing remarks in the provided data reference a lanai or balcony, and the historical MLS checkboxes (PATDEC/COVPAT) also indicated this amenity for several listings, so evidence is strong and consistent across agents rather than appearing to be a single copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Public remarks repeatedly describe shared amenities including a 'recreation area,' 'recreation area, whirlpool,' and 'open green space.' The feature appears in several listings for the building, often alongside pool, sauna, and BBQ amenities, which supports that it is a genuine common building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sauna is very strongly supported as a building amenity. Well over a dozen remarks mention 'sauna,' often alongside pool, gym, and hot tub, which aligns with the high MLS hit rate. The consistency across many listings indicates this is a real shared feature.
Two of 20 current MLS listings include STORAG/ADDLVSTORAG in the building amenities, but none of the 20 public remarks explicitly mention storage lockers or additional storage and no unit_features list storage. Evidence is therefore limited and possibly due to agents checking a box via copy/paste; include the feature with moderate confidence (0.70) pending stronger confirmation or user verification.
I looked for surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, or bike-and-surf storage references. The remarks list amenities like pool, sauna, gym, and bike storage, but nothing about surfboard storage.
No analysis available
Trash chute appears to be a building-wide amenity based on the MLS data, with 19 of 20 listings marking it. The current public remarks are silent on the feature, but the extremely strong checkbox pattern suggests this is not a mistaken agent entry. Confidence remains high because the historical signal is unusually strong.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is solid evidence that the building has a whirlpool/hot tub/spa amenity. Multiple listings mention 'hot tub,' 'whirlpool,' or 'jacuzzi,' and the wording appears in amenity lists rather than only marketing fluff. The recurring references support the current MLS amenity flag.
The pool feature is very strongly supported. Multiple listings mention it explicitly, including phrases like "pool," "swimming pool," "sparkling pool," "salt-water pool," and "large pool," appearing across a large share of the remarks. This looks like a stable building amenity rather than a copy-paste error, and the current data aligns with the historical 20/20 MLS amenity support.
No analysis available
One remark directly states the building has a "salt-water pool," which is strong explicit evidence. This supports a high-confidence true value.
In-unit laundry is strongly confirmed for Village Maluhia. Across the provided remarks, many listings explicitly mention it, including phrases like 'washer-dryer in the unit,' 'in-unit washer/dryer,' 'Washer and dryer inside the unit,' and 'washer and dryer right in the unit.' The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, aligning with the current MLS data showing 20/20 inclusions.
No analysis available
I looked for terms like coin laundry, quarters, card-operated machines, or laundry fees. The public remarks only mention in-unit washer/dryer, so there is no evidence of paid shared laundry.
I searched for floor-specific shared laundry wording such as "laundry on each floor" or "laundry room on every floor" and found nothing. The remarks consistently emphasize in-unit laundry, which does not confirm community laundry facilities on each floor.
Parking is strongly confirmed for the building. Across the provided listings, remarks explicitly mention parking in many forms, including assigned, covered, open, garage, and larger stalls. This looks like consistent building-level information rather than a one-off agent error.
Assigned parking is very strongly supported across the listings. Multiple remarks from different listings explicitly reference assigned or designated parking, which aligns with the MLS feature flags. The evidence is broad and consistent, not just copy-paste from a single agent.
Covered parking is well supported by multiple listings, including explicit phrases like "assigned covered parking," "covered parking," "covered, secured parking," and "garage parking." The evidence spans many remarks and agents, suggesting this is a real building feature rather than copied MLS checkbox noise.
I searched for explicit deeded/owned parking language such as deeded parking, parking included in deed, or owned stall. The listings consistently describe assigned or covered parking, which is not the same as explicitly deeded, so there is no direct evidence to mark this true.
No analysis available
I looked for parking fee, monthly parking charge, additional parking cost, and parking rental wording. The remarks only describe assigned, covered, or open parking, so no specific monthly parking fee can be extracted.
No analysis available
Strong evidence despite MLS checkbox discrepancy: while only 1/20 MLS entries list SECENT, many listings' remarks state 'secured entry', 'secured building entry', 'fob entry', and 'security cameras', indicating building access control and secure parking access are being advertised consistently by agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist, parking waiting list, and join-the-waitlist language. Nothing in the public remarks suggests a waitlist system, so this is set to false by absence of evidence.
No analysis available
I found clear security-access language in the remarks, including "fob entry" and "secured entry." That is strong evidence the building has a card/fob access security system.
No analysis available
I searched for wording like security patrol, roving security, or patrolled building and found nothing. The remarks mention secured entry, cameras, and resident management, but not patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is strongly supported for this building. Public remarks mention it across multiple listings, including explicit phrases like 'window a/c in bedroom,' 'AC & Parking,' and 'energy-efficient AC units in both the bedroom and living room.' This aligns with the MLS inclusions history, so the feature should be kept as true with high confidence.
Concrete construction is strongly supported: all 20 current MLS listings check CONCRE. The public remarks across many agents focus on unit updates and amenities, and none contradict the concrete designation.
Double-wall construction has only a single MLS checkbox mention out of 20 listings, with no supporting remarks from any agent. That pattern is most consistent with an isolated MLS error or unverified entry rather than an established building feature.
Hollow tile is not supported by the remarks and appears in only 1 of 20 current MLS records. No listing descriptions mention 'hollow tile' or similar language, so this looks like an unverified MLS entry.
Masonry/stucco has weak support from the MLS data only and no support from the remarks. Across the many listings reviewed, no agent explicitly describes the building as masonry or stucco, so this feature should not be treated as confirmed.
No analysis available
Concrete slab foundation is not supported by the remarks and appears only in 2 of 20 current MLS records. Because no listings mention the foundation type explicitly, this does not look like a reliable building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR indicators such as short-term rental allowed, NUC, TVU, vacation rental language, or 30-day minimum rules. The remarks do not show any STR permission, so the safest reading is that STR is not supported by the public listing remarks.
I looked for hotel rental pool references and found none. Since the remarks do not establish STR allowance either, this feature must be false.
I searched for mandatory pool wording such as required participation, must rent through a program, or cannot opt out. There is no such language in the remarks, so this is set to false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for lease expiration language such as lease expires, ground lease ends, renewed through, or an expiry year, but none was provided. The listings only confirm leasehold status, so the expiry year remains unknown.
The remarks directly indicate VA financing eligibility. The strongest evidence is the explicit "VA approved" statement, plus a VA assumable loan reference, which makes this high confidence.
Multiple listings directly describe the building as fully insured, including exact phrases like "100% hurricane insurance coverage" and "100% insured building." This is strong public-remarks evidence for full HOA/walls-in style insurance coverage.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit FLSE/pass language such as "fire/life safety evaluation passed," "FLSE passed," "fire safety certified," or "passed fire inspection," but found none. One remark says a new fire alarm system is being installed, which suggests work in progress rather than confirmation of a passed evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
At least 3–4 separate listing remarks mention ocean or partial ocean views—quotes include “Enjoy breathtaking views of ... the ocean,” and “See a tiny bit of ocean.” References come from different unit remarks rather than a single copy/paste, so evidence is strong that some units in the building have ocean views.
At least 3 distinct listings reference mountain or mauka views—examples: “Enjoy breathtaking views of ... mountains” and “lanai overlooking the mountains.” The repeated, explicit mentions across different listings indicate some units offer mountain views.
At least 4 listing remarks explicitly reference Diamond Head—quotes include “Enjoy breathtaking views of Diamond Head” and “Located on the Diamond Head side.” Multiple independent remarks support that some units in the building have Diamond Head views.
Strong evidence that Village Maluhia offers city-view units. Current remarks explicitly mention "city views," "city skyline," and views from higher floors/lanai spaces in multiple listings, including some that also reference Diamond Head and partial ocean views. The evidence appears consistent across several agents rather than a one-off copy-paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing remarks mention sunrise or eastern exposure. While one MLS view_descriptions entry lists SUNRIS, the public remarks across many units do not reference sunrise views, so there is strong evidence that sunrise is not a confirmed building-level offering.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for direct statements about seeing Friday night fireworks from the building or units. The remarks mention ocean, mountain, city, and Diamond Head views, but nothing about fireworks views.
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence that Village Maluhia has a resident manager on-site. Multiple listings explicitly say “resident manager,” and at least one also says “on-site management,” with the amenity appearing consistently across many remarks rather than as a one-off agent entry. This aligns with the historical MLS pattern of 18/20 listings showing RESMAN.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.