Village Maluhia
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Village Maluhia
Building Overview
Village Maluhia in Downtown-Chinatown offers a pool and ocean/mountain views.
About Village Maluhia
Village Maluhia is located in the Downtown–Chinatown neighborhood and was built in 1967. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete. Size and unit count are not provided in the MLS data.
The building's reported amenities include a pool, fitness center, BBQ area, and a resident manager. Units are noted as having window air conditioning. Views from the property are listed as ocean and mountain.
Parking is described as available, covered, and assigned. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all building details, rules, and any applicable fees with the managing agent or condominium association.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for owner-occupancy percentages or descriptive phrases indicating a high owner-occupied ratio, but none appeared. References to "first-time buyer," "homeowner story," and similar marketing language do not establish the building's owner-occupancy rate.
I searched the remarks for explicit elevator counts or phrases indicating multiple elevators, but none were provided. The building is clearly served by at least one elevator, yet the number cannot be determined from these listings alone.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence that cable TV is included. One remark states, "Cable TV and internet are included in the maintenance fee," and the MLS shows CABTV in 16/20 recent listings. This looks consistent across multiple listings rather than a one-off agent error.
Evidence points away from common electricity being included. Remarks say, "Electricity expense is separately listed on the monthly maintenance fee statement" and "Electricity is sub-metered," which indicates power costs are not covered by the maintenance fee. The MLS checkbox data is inconsistent (11/20 OTCOEX), so this appears likely to be agent copy/paste noise rather than a building-wide benefit.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Present in several listings: although only 2/20 MLS checkboxes show GAS, there are explicit remarks noting "gas" is included with maintenance fees (phrases like "includes ... gas"). Evidence is less ubiquitous than water/sewer but explicit repeated mentions support inclusion at the building level.
Hot water appears to be included in the maintenance fee. Multiple remarks say, "Maintenance fee includes hot water" or list "Hot Water" among included items, and the MLS shows HOTWAT in 15/20 listings. The consistency across listings supports this as a real building feature.
One public remark clearly states 'Cable TV and internet are included in the maintenance fee!' and a small number of MLS records list INTSER. Evidence is limited to a single explicit remark in this corpus and sparse MLS checks, so inclusion is plausible but confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is very strong and consistent. Remarks directly say, "Maintenance fee includes ... sewer" and the MLS checkbox shows SEWER in 20/20 listings. This is highly reliable building-level information.
Water is clearly included in the maintenance fee. Several remarks state, "Maintenance fee includes ... water," and the MLS shows WATER in 20/20 listings. The evidence is strong across multiple listings and agents, with no meaningful contradiction.
Strong evidence across the supplied remarks: approximately 15–17 listings explicitly mention 'BBQ', 'BBQ area', or 'barbecue area' (e.g., 'barbecue area', 'BBQ area', 'barbecue area, resident manager'). Mentions appear across multiple agent remarks rather than a single isolated posting, indicating the building offers shared BBQ/grilling facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Limited but present evidence: 2–3 listings explicitly mention 'clubhouse'/'club house' in agent remarks. Evidence is not widespread across listings, so inclusion is warranted for buyers but with moderate confidence; some agent copy/paste cannot be ruled out.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence: roughly 12–15 public remarks explicitly reference a gym/fitness center/weight room (phrases include 'gym', 'exercise room', 'fitness center', 'weight room'). Mentions appear across many agent remarks rather than a single copy/paste, providing high confidence that the building offers an exercise room.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple unit remarks explicitly mention lanais/balconies—examples include "two private lanais," "private lanai," "screened lanai," and "covered lanai." At least 10 separate listing remarks in the provided data reference a lanai or balcony, and the historical MLS checkboxes (PATDEC/COVPAT) also indicated this amenity for several listings, so evidence is strong and consistent across agents rather than appearing to be a single copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Public remarks repeatedly describe shared amenities including a 'recreation area,' 'recreation area, whirlpool,' and 'open green space.' The feature appears in several listings for the building, often alongside pool, sauna, and BBQ amenities, which supports that it is a genuine common building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sauna is mentioned across a large share of the listings, often in the same amenity set as pool, gym, whirlpool, and BBQ area. The repetition across multiple remarks strongly indicates this is a real building amenity rather than copied MLS boilerplate.
Two of 20 current MLS listings include STORAG/ADDLVSTORAG in the building amenities, but none of the 20 public remarks explicitly mention storage lockers or additional storage and no unit_features list storage. Evidence is therefore limited and possibly due to agents checking a box via copy/paste; include the feature with moderate confidence (0.70) pending stronger confirmation or user verification.
I looked for amenity language like surfboard storage, board storage, or bike-and-surf storage. The remarks list amenities such as pool, gym, sauna, and storage-related conveniences, but nothing specifically for surfboards.
No analysis available
Trash chute is strongly supported by the current MLS checkbox data, with 19 of 20 listings marking the amenity. While the public remarks in this sample do not call it out directly, the near-unanimous current MLS pattern makes it likely to be a real building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong corroboration: approximately 10–14 public remarks explicitly reference 'hot tub', 'whirlpool', or 'jacuzzi' (e.g., 'hot tub', 'whirlpool', 'jacuzzi'). Mentions are repeated across multiple agent remarks, supporting high confidence that the building provides a whirlpool/hot tub.
The pool feature is strongly supported: many current listings mention it, and it appears in multiple forms such as 'pool,' 'swimming pool,' 'sparkling pool,' 'salt-water pool,' and 'resort-style amenities.' The evidence is consistent across numerous listings and agents, so this looks like a real shared building amenity rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
One public remark directly states that the building has a "salt-water pool." This is strong, explicit evidence that the pool is salt water.
In-unit laundry is strongly confirmed for Village Maluhia. Multiple current listings explicitly mention it, including phrases such as 'in-unit washer/dryer,' 'washer and dryer inside unit,' 'washer/dryer are inside the unit,' and 'washer/dryer for added convenience.' The evidence is consistent across many remarks and does not look like a one-off agent copy; it matches the already high-confidence MLS data.
No analysis available
I looked for public remarks indicating shared laundry is pay-per-use, such as coin laundry or card-operated machines. The remarks mention in-unit washer/dryer and other amenities, but nothing about a paid community laundry room.
I searched the public remarks for wording like "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," or similar floor-specific laundry references. The listings only mention in-unit washer/dryer, not shared laundry located on every floor.
Strong evidence building offers parking: 20 of 20 current MLS listings indicate some form of parking (open/covered/garage). Remarks repeatedly mention covered parking, garage parking, and parking stalls (e.g., "covered parking", "garage parking", "open parking"), consistent across multiple agents rather than isolated copy/paste errors.
Assigned parking is strongly supported across the remarks, with many listings explicitly saying "assigned parking stall," "assigned covered parking," or "designated parking space." This aligns with the current MLS data showing ASSIGN in most listings, so the evidence appears consistent rather than a one-off agent error.
Covered parking is well supported by multiple listings, including explicit phrases like "assigned covered parking," "covered parking," "covered, secured parking," and "garage parking." The evidence spans many remarks and agents, suggesting this is a real building feature rather than copied MLS checkbox noise.
The public remarks consistently describe parking as assigned and included with the unit, and one listing explicitly calls it a "fee simple unit." That supports a deeded/owned parking interpretation.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee, monthly parking charge, additional parking cost, and parking rental language. The listings describe parking as assigned, covered, or garage parking, but do not mention any separate monthly fee.
No analysis available
Strong evidence despite MLS checkbox discrepancy: while only 1/20 MLS entries list SECENT, many listings' remarks state 'secured entry', 'secured building entry', 'fob entry', and 'security cameras', indicating building access control and secure parking access are being advertised consistently by agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for parking waitlist, parking waiting list, and join the waitlist for parking. None of the remarks indicate a waitlist, so there is no evidence that the building uses one.
No analysis available
I looked for card/fob access language such as keycard entry, card reader access, or electronic entry. Multiple remarks mention fob entry and secured entry, which supports a card/fob-based security system.
No analysis available
I searched for public remarks describing a patrol service or roving security presence. The listings mention secured entry, security cameras, and a resident manager, but no security patrol.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is strongly supported for this building. Public remarks mention it across multiple listings, including explicit phrases like 'window a/c in bedroom,' 'AC & Parking,' and 'energy-efficient AC units in both the bedroom and living room.' This aligns with the MLS inclusions history, so the feature should be kept as true with high confidence.
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS data: all 20 current listings list CONCRE. The remarks across many agents focus on amenities and unit upgrades, and do not suggest any different building construction, so this appears consistent and reliable.
Double-wall construction has only a single MLS checkbox mention out of 20 listings, with no supporting remarks from any agent. That pattern is most consistent with an isolated MLS error or unverified entry rather than an established building feature.
No analysis available
Masonry/stucco is not supported by the remarks and appears only in a small minority of current MLS records (3/20). The lack of any agent descriptions mentioning stucco or masonry suggests this is likely a copy-paste or data-entry inconsistency, so it should not be treated as a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
A single out of 20 listings checks 'SLAB', while all others leave this unchecked and no remarks discuss the foundation. Given the guidance to omit features with low historical confidence and no narrative support, slab construction is treated as not a confirmed building feature here.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR indicators such as short-term rental allowed, legal vacation rental, NUC, TVU, and 30-day minimum language. The remarks do not reference any STR permission, so I treat STR as not allowed based on available public remarks.
I looked for hotel rental pool, hotel program, managed by hotel, and brand-pool references like Hilton or Ritz pool. No such remarks appear, and since STR is not shown as allowed, this must be false.
I searched for mandatory pool wording such as required participation, cannot opt out, or must rent through a program. The listings contain none of that language, so there is no evidence of a mandatory rental pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like lease expires, ground lease ends, leasehold expiring, renewed through, and lease expiry year. The listings confirm the building is leasehold, but none provide a 4-digit expiration year, so the expiry remains unknown.
The listings directly reference VA financing eligibility, including a VA assumable loan and an explicit VA-approved remark. This is strong public evidence that the building supports VA financing.
Multiple public remarks directly state that the building is fully insured, including exact phrases like "100% hurricane insurance coverage" and "100% insured building." This is strong, repeated evidence, so confidence is very high.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases such as fire/life safety evaluation passed, FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection, and found no such confirmation. The fire alarm upgrade suggests safety work, but it does not indicate a passed evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
At least 3–4 separate listing remarks mention ocean or partial ocean views—quotes include “Enjoy breathtaking views of ... the ocean,” and “See a tiny bit of ocean.” References come from different unit remarks rather than a single copy/paste, so evidence is strong that some units in the building have ocean views.
At least 3 distinct listings reference mountain or mauka views—examples: “Enjoy breathtaking views of ... mountains” and “lanai overlooking the mountains.” The repeated, explicit mentions across different listings indicate some units offer mountain views.
At least 4 listing remarks explicitly reference Diamond Head—quotes include “Enjoy breathtaking views of Diamond Head” and “Located on the Diamond Head side.” Multiple independent remarks support that some units in the building have Diamond Head views.
Strong evidence the building offers city-view units. Multiple listings explicitly mention "city views," "city skyline," and views from high-floor lanais/windows, and the current MLS data shows 17/20 listings with CITY in the view descriptions. This appears to be a consistent building-level offering rather than a one-off agent error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing remarks mention sunrise or eastern exposure. While one MLS view_descriptions entry lists SUNRIS, the public remarks across many units do not reference sunrise views, so there is strong evidence that sunrise is not a confirmed building-level offering.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for direct statements like "fireworks view," "see fireworks from the unit," or watching fireworks from a lanai. The remarks mention ocean, Diamond Head, mountain, and city views, but nothing about fireworks views from the building.
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building has a resident manager. Current listings explicitly mention "resident manager" and "on-site management" across multiple remarks, aligning with historical MLS data showing RESMAN in 18 of 20 listings. This appears to be consistent across many agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.