Valleyview Melemanu
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Valleyview Melemanu
Building Overview
Valleyview Melemanu in Mililani-Waipio (built 1973) with mountain views, pool and BBQ area.
About Valleyview Melemanu
Valleyview Melemanu is a residential building located in the Mililani-Waipio neighborhood. According to available records the building was constructed in 1973 using concrete construction. MLS data do not include unit count or typical unit sizes, so those details should be verified with the listing or management.
Key on-site features recorded in MLS data include a swimming pool, a shared BBQ area, and a resident manager. Mountain views are noted for the property. The building data do not list additional amenity details beyond those items.
Parking is listed as covered. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed, per the MLS information. The management company is listed as unknown in available records. Based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details with the listing agent, management, or condominium documents before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for any owner-occupancy indicators such as a percentage, a majority-owner-occupied statement, or similar language. The remarks do not provide any owner-occupancy information, so the percentage remains unknown.
I searched the remarks for an explicit elevator count like "1 elevator" or "4 elevators." No exact count was stated, but several listings refer to a singular elevator access point, which suggests the building has one elevator. Because the count is not explicitly confirmed, confidence remains low.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common area electricity is strongly supported at the building level. The current MLS sample shows 17/20 listings with OTCOEX checked, and there are no remarks indicating a change or exception. This appears to be consistent across multiple listings rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water does not appear to be included in the maintenance fee. The current MLS data is very consistent: 0/20 listings check HOTWAT, and many units explicitly have water heaters (WTRHTR), which usually means unit-owned hot water rather than building-supplied hot water. No public remarks describe a building-wide hot water service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is well supported across the current listing set. The MLS history is strong at 17/20, and at least one remark explicitly states the HOA fee includes 'water, sewer.' This looks like a building-level amenity that agents are consistently carrying forward.
Water inclusion is strongly supported by both MLS data and remarks. The current sample shows 17/20 listings with WATER checked, and a remark explicitly notes the fee includes 'water, sewer.' The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents.
BBQ facilities are strongly supported across many remarks and align with the current MLS pattern. At least 8+ listings explicitly reference BBQ amenities, often in the exact phrase "BBQ area" or "covered BBQ/picnic area," which looks consistent rather than a copy-paste error. This is high-confidence building-level evidence that BBQ/grilling is available.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Direct clubhouse mentions are sparse, but the community is repeatedly described as having a "rec center" or "recreation center," which suggests a shared clubhouse/community center function. Because explicit clubhouse wording is limited, this is a moderate-confidence inference rather than a high-confidence explicit match. The evidence supports a common community amenity space, but not as strongly as BBQ or recreation area.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building offers patio/deck-style outdoor spaces. Dozens of listings mention lanais, balconies, private lanais, dual lanais, and even a covered patio, with multiple agents describing them in different units. The evidence is consistent across the listing set and aligns with the prior high-confidence MLS data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Recreation area is strongly supported across the listing set: at least 4-6 remarks explicitly mention a recreation center/area, recreation areas, or an amenity space near the pool and BBQs. This lines up with the MLS pattern (14/20 current listings checked RECARE), so the evidence appears consistent and not just copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listing remarks reference on-unit or assigned storage: at least 4 separate listings explicitly mention storage (quotes include “dedicated storage shed,” “extra hallway storage,” and “two storage sheds on the lanai”). MLS checkbox data is sparse (1/20 amenities, 2/20 unit_features) but the consistent agent remarks across different listings indicate the building offers storage/lockers for some units.
I searched for surfboard-specific storage references such as "surfboard storage" or "board storage" and found none. The remarks do mention general storage sheds and lanai storage, but nothing surfboard-specific.
Tennis court access appears in a small number of listings, but the phrasing is explicit rather than implied. The strongest current remark says the community has a "pool, park, tennis court, guest parking, resident manager, and 24-hour security patrol." Evidence is limited but sufficient to support the amenity at building/community level.
Trash chute has moderate but real support: one remark explicitly mentions a 'Convenient trash chute,' and 6/20 current MLS listings have TRACHU checked. The evidence is not widespread in remarks, but the explicit mention plus ongoing MLS checkbox support suggests the building does have a chute system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool access is strongly supported across the building’s recent listings. Multiple remarks explicitly reference a “large pool,” “community pool,” “association pool,” “recreation center with beautiful pool,” and “swimming pool to swim some laps,” which confirms the amenity is not just an MLS checkbox artifact. Evidence is consistent across many listings and appears to reflect a shared building amenity rather than a one-off unit feature.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit salt-pool language such as "salt water pool" or "saltwater pool" and found nothing. The remarks mention a community pool frequently, but never identify it as salt water.
In-unit laundry is overwhelmingly supported: roughly 19 of 20 current listings include washer/dryer in inclusions, and many remarks explicitly say “in-unit washer and dryer,” “full size washer/dryer,” or “washer/dryer in unit.” The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents and listings, so this feature should be treated as present in the building.
No analysis available
I searched for references to paid shared laundry, including coin laundry, quarters, card-operated machines, or laundry fees, and found no evidence. The listings repeatedly mention in-unit washer/dryer, which points away from paid community laundry being a notable building feature.
I looked for public remarks describing shared laundry facilities on each floor, such as "laundry on every floor" or "floor-by-floor laundry," and found nothing. The remarks instead emphasize in-unit washer/dryer in many listings, which does not support community laundry on every floor.
Parking is clearly present across the building. The current MLS data shows 20/20 listings with parking features, and the remarks repeatedly mention phrases like "parking stall," "two parking stalls," "covered parking," and "garage parking stall." The evidence is strong and consistent across multiple listings, not just a single agent remark.
Assigned/reserved parking is strongly supported across the listings, with many remarks explicitly mentioning 'assigned parking stall,' 'dedicated parking stall,' or 'ASSIGNED parking close to the unit.' The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error, and there is no meaningful indication that this feature has been removed.
Covered parking is very well supported, with numerous listings explicitly stating 'one covered,' 'one covered and one open,' '2 covered parking stalls,' or 'assigned covered parking stall.' Several remarks also place the stall on the same level or in a parking structure/garage, indicating this is a real building feature rather than MLS checkbox noise.
I looked for explicit deeded-parking wording such as deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in deed and found none. The listings describe assigned parking and convenient access, but that is not enough to mark parking as deeded.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee language such as monthly parking charge, parking rental, or any extra stall cost and found nothing. The remarks discuss parking locations and stall counts, but not a separate fee.
Guest parking is clearly available in the building/complex. At least a dozen current remarks explicitly say "ample guest parking," "plenty of guest parking," "guest parking nearby," or "many guest parking stalls just outside the building." The repeated phrasing across multiple listings supports this as a real shared amenity rather than an MLS checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist, parking waiting list, or joining a waitlist for parking and found none. The listings only describe available or assigned stalls, so there is no evidence of a waitlist system.
No analysis available
I looked for building-access language like keycard entry, fob access, card reader systems, or electronic entry and found no clear evidence. A smart lock is mentioned for one unit door, but that is unit-level and does not establish building card access.
10 of 20 current MLS listings have the SECGUA amenity checked and at least two separate public remarks explicitly mention building security, including the phrase '24-hour security patrol' and references to 'security' in community amenities. Evidence comes from multiple agent remarks plus the MLS amenity checkbox across half the listings, indicating the building likely offers on-site/security patrol service.
This feature is directly supported by the public remarks. The listing explicitly mentions 24-hour security patrol, which is strong evidence that the building has patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is strong evidence that some units in the building have window/room AC. At least several remarks explicitly describe AC, including one listing stating "New window air conditioners have been installed in the living room and the main bedroom" and another noting a "brand new 20,000 BTU air condition unit." This aligns with the historical MLS checkbox data and appears to reflect a real unit-level feature rather than a copy-paste error.
Strong building-level evidence supports concrete construction. Current MLS data shows 19 of 20 listings marked CONCRE, and at least one public remark explicitly says 'solid concrete construction for natural sound insulation.' The consistency across listings suggests this is a real building feature rather than an agent copy/paste error.
There is no remark-level evidence for double-wall construction in the current listings. Since the stronger and repeated building description is concrete, the limited MLS double-wall checkboxes look like likely copy/paste noise. Confidence is high that this feature should not be included.
Public remarks do not support hollow-tile construction, and the current MLS pattern is overwhelmingly concrete (19 of 20) with only a small minority checking HOLTIL. Because no remarks reference hollow tile and concrete is repeatedly confirmed, the hollow-tile flag appears to be an MLS inconsistency rather than a genuine building attribute.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The current remarks do not corroborate a slab foundation at all. Although some MLS entries check SLAB, none of the public remarks mention 'concrete slab' or similar wording. This looks more like unverified MLS data than a confirmed building characteristic.
No analysis available
No public remarks support wood-frame construction, while the dominant building description is concrete. With only 2 of 20 MLS entries checking WOOFRA and repeated concrete references, wood-frame is unlikely to be a genuine building feature. This is best treated as a false/erroneous MLS flag.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators such as STR permitted, legal vacation rental, NUC, TVU, hotel program language, and minimum-rental rules, but found no such references. With no public remark support for STRs, the building is treated as not confirmed to allow them.
I looked for hotel rental pool references such as Hilton pool, Ritz pool, hotel-managed program, or similar terms and found none. Because there is no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed, this must be false.
I searched for mandatory hotel pool wording such as required participation, cannot opt out, or must be in a rental program and found none. Since there is also no evidence that STR is allowed, mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as lease expires, ground lease, leasehold, renewal, or an expiration year and found nothing. Without a specific year in the public remarks, the lease expiry remains unknown.
Public remarks repeatedly and directly confirm VA financing availability for this building. The evidence is strong, consistent, and explicit across many listings, so this feature is high confidence true.
I searched the remarks for insurance-related phrases that would indicate the HOA provides full or walls-in coverage. Nothing in the listings references building insurance coverage, so this cannot be confirmed from the remarks.
No analysis available
I looked for any language indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation, such as FLSE passed, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection. The public remarks do not mention any of these terms, so there is no evidence to confirm this feature.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain-view evidence remains strong for this building. Multiple listings explicitly mention 'mountain view,' 'treetop views,' and other elevated scenic descriptions, which is consistent with the historical MLS pattern. The repeated nature of these remarks across different listings suggests this is a real building-level offering, not just a single-agent copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Garden-view evidence is very strong across the remarks. Numerous listings describe 'garden view,' 'lush tropical greenery,' 'green garden,' and similar landscaped or courtyard-style outlooks, indicating this feature is broadly available in the building. The consistency across many listings and agents makes this a high-confidence building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings mention sunset or western/exposure views. MLS view_descriptions currently show 0/20 with 'SUNSET' and some explicit 'NONE' entries; public remarks across the listings instead reference 'treetop', 'garden', 'mountain' or 'sunrise' views but never 'sunset' or 'evening sun'. Given prior Low confidence and consistent absence of sunset language across multiple agents' remarks and the MLS, set view_sunset = false.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit statements like "see fireworks from the unit" or "watch fireworks from the lanai," and found none. The views described are consistently natural and interior to the area, not fireworks-oriented.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence strongly supports an on-site resident manager at this building. One current remark explicitly says there is a "dedicated resident manager," and the MLS amenities data still shows RESMAN in 12 of 20 listings. This appears to be a consistent building-level feature rather than a copy-paste outlier.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.