Valleyview Melemanu
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Valleyview Melemanu
Building Overview
Valleyview Melemanu in Mililani-Waipio (built 1973) with mountain views, pool and BBQ area.
About Valleyview Melemanu
Valleyview Melemanu is a residential building located in the Mililani-Waipio neighborhood. According to available records the building was constructed in 1973 using concrete construction. MLS data do not include unit count or typical unit sizes, so those details should be verified with the listing or management.
Key on-site features recorded in MLS data include a swimming pool, a shared BBQ area, and a resident manager. Mountain views are noted for the property. The building data do not list additional amenity details beyond those items.
Parking is listed as covered. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed, per the MLS information. The management company is listed as unknown in available records. Based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details with the listing agent, management, or condominium documents before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy statements (percentages or clear descriptors) across all listings and found none. Because there is no prior numeric value and no explicit mention, the owner-occupancy percentage is unknown and cannot be inferred.
Multiple listings reference elevator access and parking located near or next to elevators, confirming elevators exist, but no remarks provide an explicit count. Per rules, cannot infer a numeric value without an explicit number in the public remarks.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox data indicates OTCOEX (common area electricity) is included in association fees in 17 of 20 current listings. None of the public remarks explicitly state that common area electricity is billed separately or mention a change; evidence is strong across multiple MLS listings, though remarks appear silent (likely copy/paste by agents).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 90%: HOTWAT is absent from association_fee_includes in all 20 MLS listings, while 15/20 list individual water heaters (WTRHTR) in inclusions, indicating hot water is provided per-unit rather than as a central association-paid utility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS data shows sewer is included in the HOA/association fees in 18 of 20 current listings. Public remarks across listings contain no statements that sewer is separately metered or newly changed, so the MLS pattern (multiple agents) supports inclusion.
MLS checkbox data indicates water is included in association fees in 18 of 20 current listings. There are no public remarks contradicting this or describing a recent change, so the consistent MLS entries across listings support marking water as included.
Building-level BBQ/grilling facilities are consistently reported: historical MLS checkbox data indicated BBQ in 17 of 20 listings, and the current public remarks mention BBQ/BBQ area/BBQ and recreation area in numerous listings (at least 10 separate remarks), with phrases like "BBQ area," "BBQ and recreation area," and "friendly BBQ area." Evidence is strong and appears across multiple agent remarks rather than being a single outlier.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 97%: Remarks refer to a 'rec center with large pool, BBQ area, basketball courts', 'recreation center', and 'recreation areas', and 14/20 MLS listings include RECARE.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', and related phrases. The remarks describe storage sheds on lanais and general storage but do not reference dedicated surfboard storage, so no evidence was found.
No analysis available
Confidence 90%: One listing explicitly notes a 'Convenient trash chute', and 6/20 MLS listings have TRACHU checked, which is consistent with a building-level system rather than a unit-specific feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence across listings that the complex offers a pool: multiple listings (20 of the recent MLS records and many public remarks) mention amenities like 'community pool', 'association swimming pool', 'rec center with large pool', and 'large pool'. Mentions appear across different agent remarks rather than a single outlier, so confidence remains high that the building has a shared swimming pool.
No analysis available
Searched for 'salt water pool', 'saltwater', 'saline pool' terms. Remarks only reference a community/association pool with no description of salt water, so no evidence it is a salt pool.
Strong evidence that some units have in-unit laundry: over 20 separate listing remarks explicitly state in-unit washer/dryer (examples: 'in-unit washer and dryer', 'full-size washer/dryer were all purchased in 2025', 'new washer/dryer installed-2024'). Evidence is consistent across many agent listings (likely some copy-paste but also specific install dates and appliance details in several remarks), so include laundry_in_unit = true with high confidence.
No analysis available
Searched for 'coin laundry', 'paid laundry', 'card operated', 'quarters', and related phrases. No public remarks indicate paid/common coin/card-operated laundry; many units have in-unit washers/dryers instead.
Searched for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', or 'floor-by-floor laundry'. Public remarks consistently describe in-unit washer/dryer or community laundry access (not floor-by-floor), so there is no evidence that laundry facilities are on every floor.
All 20 current MLS entries include parking features and the public remarks repeatedly reference parking: many listings state "two parking stalls", others note an "assigned covered parking stall" or "parking stall located near the lanai/elevator." Evidence is strong and consistent across multiple listings and agents, indicating the building offers parking.
No analysis available
Confidence 98%: Numerous remarks describe 'two covered parking stalls', 'assigned covered parking stall', and 'TWO Covered Parking Stalls', and 12/20 MLS listings indicate covered/garage parking options.
I searched for explicit phrases indicating parking is deeded (e.g., 'deeded parking', 'owned stall') and found only 'assigned' or 'dedicated' wording. Without explicit 'deeded' language, we treat deeded parking as false (medium-low confidence).
No analysis available
Searched for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', 'parking rental', etc. There is no information in the public remarks about a parking fee, so the value is unknown.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for terms like 'parking waitlist' or 'waiting list' in relation to parking; none were present. In absence of any mention, treat parking waitlist as not indicated (moderate confidence).
No analysis available
Searched for terms like 'key card access', 'fob access', or 'card reader'. The remarks mention 'security' and '24-hour security patrol' in places but do not describe card/fob electronic access, so there is no evidence of a card-based access system.
9 of 20 current MLS listings have the SECGUA amenity checked. At least two public remarks explicitly reference building security — one notes a 'resident manager, and 24-hour security patrol' and another lists 'features... security.' Mentions appear in multiple agent remarks but are not universal across listings, suggesting the service likely exists but evidence is moderate rather than overwhelming.
Remarks explicitly reference '24-hour security patrol' and other listings mention 'security' among community features. This is clear evidence that a security patrol service is present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
High-confidence evidence: 19 of 20 current MLS listings show CONCRE in construction_materials and the public remarks consistently describe a midrise/low-rise, masonry-like condominium complex without any statements contradicting concrete construction. Multiple agent listings and the strong historical checkbox consensus support including construction_concrete.
No analysis available
Confidence 88%: Only 2/20 MLS listings check HOLTIL while 19/20 specify CONCRE, and no remarks reference hollow-tile construction, suggesting the occasional HOLTIL entries are likely agent error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Weak/ambiguous evidence: 6 of 20 current MLS entries list SLAB in construction_materials, but none of the public remarks mention a 'concrete slab' or 'slab foundation.' Because remarks provide no corroboration and historical verification is absent, slab foundation is possible per MLS checkboxes but remains low-confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 'short-term rental', 'vacation rental', 'TVU', 'NUC', and '30-day minimum' wording. There are no STR-related mentions in the public remarks, so STR is treated as not indicated (moderate confidence).
Because public remarks contain no STR references and no hotel rental pool language (e.g., 'hotel rental pool', 'part of hotel operations'), hotel-pool participation is set to false. This is dependent on STR being not allowed/unspecified.
Searched for 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', and related language. No evidence found; since STR is not indicated, mandatory hotel-pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'leasehold expiring in', and specific years. No leasehold/lease-expiry information appears in the remarks, so the expiry year is unknown.
Multiple public remarks across listings explicitly state VA approval and VA-assumable options. This strongly supports that the building is VA loan approved.
I searched all remarks for explicit insurance coverage language (e.g., 'fully insured', 'walls-in coverage', 'comprehensive building insurance') and found none. Therefore the building is recorded as not (explicitly) fully insured by HOA in the public remarks, with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for phrases like 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE', 'passed fire inspection', and similar terms; none were found. With no explicit statements, the feature is set false with medium confidence (absence likely means not stated publicly).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 90%: One listing explicitly advertises 'a lanai with a mountain view', and several others reference treetop, forest, or valley views, showing that at least some units enjoy a mountain/valley backdrop even though 0/20 MLS view_descriptions use the MOUNTA code.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 1 of 20 current MLS view_descriptions includes 'SUNSET', while 4/20 explicitly list NONE. None of the public remarks in these listings mention 'sunset', 'evening sun', or 'western exposure'—remarks instead note 'treetop', 'garden', 'mountain', and 'sunrise' views. Evidence is minimal and appears isolated to a single MLS field entry, so the building may offer some sunset-viewing units but the feature is weakly supported across listings.
No analysis available
Looked for explicit wording such as 'watch fireworks from lanai', 'fireworks view from unit/building', or similar. There are no such mentions in the provided remarks, so no evidence of a fireworks view.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 95%: At least one listing explicitly mentions a 'dedicated resident manager', another notes 'resident manager' with security, and 14/20 MLS listings have RESMAN checked.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.