Valleyview Melemanu
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Valleyview Melemanu
Building Overview
Valleyview Melemanu in Mililani-Waipio (built 1973) with mountain views, pool and BBQ area.
About Valleyview Melemanu
Valleyview Melemanu is a residential building located in the Mililani-Waipio neighborhood. According to available records the building was constructed in 1973 using concrete construction. MLS data do not include unit count or typical unit sizes, so those details should be verified with the listing or management.
Key on-site features recorded in MLS data include a swimming pool, a shared BBQ area, and a resident manager. Mountain views are noted for the property. The building data do not list additional amenity details beyond those items.
Parking is listed as covered. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed, per the MLS information. The management company is listed as unknown in available records. Based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details with the listing agent, management, or condominium documents before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for an explicit percentage and descriptions such as '80% owner occupied,' 'majority owner occupied,' and 'highly owner occupied.' None were mentioned, so owner occupancy cannot be determined.
I searched for an explicit number of elevators, such as '4 elevators' or 'multiple elevators.' The remarks only describe elevator proximity or indicate that some units do not require elevator access, so the building's elevator count remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks explicitly mention common-area electricity or building power. However, 17/20 current listings mark OTCOEX, providing strong multi-listing evidence that common-area expenses are included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No reviewed public remarks mention hot water being included in the maintenance fee. The strong presence of WTRHTR (15/20 listings) and near-absence of HOTWAT (1/20) indicate that units generally have individual water heaters rather than building-supplied included hot water.
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least one listing directly states that the monthly maintenance fee '$830/month includes water, sewer.' SEWER is also reported in 17 of 20 current listings, providing strong agreement across the MLS data despite the limited number of explicit remarks.
A public remark explicitly says the '$830/month includes water, sewer,' directly confirming water inclusion. WATER is checked in 17 of 20 current listings, indicating strong building-level support across multiple listings.
At least 10 listings explicitly mention BBQ amenities, using phrases such as 'barbecue areas,' 'covered BBQ/picnic area,' and 'friendly BBQ area.' The repeated references across multiple listings and alignment with 14/20 MLS amenity records strongly establish that the building offers BBQ facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Direct clubhouse mentions are sparse, but the community is repeatedly described as having a "rec center" or "recreation center," which suggests a shared clubhouse/community center function. Because explicit clubhouse wording is limited, this is a moderate-confidence inference rather than a high-confidence explicit match. The evidence supports a common community amenity space, but not as strongly as BBQ or recreation area.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building offers patio/deck-style outdoor spaces. Dozens of listings mention lanais, balconies, private lanais, dual lanais, and even a covered patio, with multiple agents describing them in different units. The evidence is consistent across the listing set and aligns with the prior high-confidence MLS data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 9 listings explicitly mention a recreation center, recreation area, recreational area, or related shared amenity space. Examples include 'rec center with large pool,' 'relax at the recreation center,' and 'pool, BBQ, recreation areas,' with consistent references across multiple agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listing remarks reference on-unit or assigned storage: at least 4 separate listings explicitly mention storage (quotes include “dedicated storage shed,” “extra hallway storage,” and “two storage sheds on the lanai”). MLS checkbox data is sparse (1/20 amenities, 2/20 unit_features) but the consistent agent remarks across different listings indicate the building offers storage/lockers for some units.
The listings support the existence of general storage sheds and storage for beach-related items. No public remark specifically confirms a surfboard storage facility.
At least two current remarks explicitly reference tennis facilities, including 'tennis and basketball courts' and 'community amenities like a pool, park, tennis court.' Although fewer listings mention tennis than BBQ or recreation amenities, the explicit wording and 3/20 MLS matches support that the building offers access to a tennis court.
One listing directly states 'Convenient trash chute,' while 8/20 current MLS records include the TRACHU amenity. Public remarks mention this feature less often than the other amenities, but the explicit reference plus historical high confidence supports inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 18 current listing remarks explicitly mention a shared swimming pool or pool access, including descriptions of a "large pool," "huge community association pool," and an "expansive pool and gathering area." The evidence is strong across numerous listings and agents and consistently corroborates the historical MLS data, rather than appearing to be an isolated copied checkbox.
No analysis available
A pool is clearly present and consistent with the building context. No public-remarks evidence establishes that the pool uses salt water.
More than 20 listings mention in-unit laundry, including “in-unit washer and dryer,” “full-size washer and dryer,” “washer/dryer in the unit,” and “in-unit laundry.” The evidence is strong across many listings and agents, while current MLS data confirms washer/dryer inclusions in 19 of 20 listings.
No analysis available
The listings emphasize in-unit laundry, with no indication that residents use shared laundry facilities. No mentions were found of coins, quarters, laundry fees, or payment cards.
The listings consistently describe private in-unit laundry rather than community laundry facilities. No public remarks support floor-by-floor laundry rooms.
Parking is clearly present across the building. The current MLS data shows 20/20 listings with parking features, and the remarks repeatedly mention phrases like "parking stall," "two parking stalls," "covered parking," and "garage parking stall." The evidence is strong and consistent across multiple listings, not just a single agent remark.
Assigned/reserved parking is strongly supported across the listings, with many remarks explicitly mentioning 'assigned parking stall,' 'dedicated parking stall,' or 'ASSIGNED parking close to the unit.' The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error, and there is no meaningful indication that this feature has been removed.
Covered parking is strongly supported across numerous listings from different agents, with well over 10 remarks explicitly mentioning covered stalls or garage parking. Key phrases include 'two covered garage parking stalls,' 'two covered assigned parking stalls,' and 'assigned covered parking stall,' confirming this is a building-level feature rather than an isolated checkbox.
The listings confirm that many units have assigned or covered stalls, sometimes two stalls, but assigned parking does not establish deeded ownership. No explicit deeded-parking language was found.
No analysis available
The remarks discuss assigned, covered, garage, guest, and multiple parking stalls but do not identify a parking charge. The monthly parking fee is therefore unknown.
Guest parking is clearly available throughout the complex and is mentioned by many independent listings. Remarks repeatedly use phrases such as 'ample guest parking nearby,' 'several guest parking nearby,' 'plenty of Guest Parking around complex,' and 'ample visitor parking,' providing strong corroboration beyond copied MLS fields.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings describe parking availability and guest parking but contain no waitlist-related language. There is no public-remarks evidence of a parking waitlist.
No analysis available
The listings provide some evidence of general security and code-based smart-lock access. The requested card- or fob-based security system is not mentioned.
Security is mentioned explicitly in at least 2 listings, including "24-hour security patrol" and "building amenities galore" with "security." Combined with the historically high-confidence evidence and SECGUA checked on 8/20 current listings, this supports an active building security service rather than an isolated or unsupported checkbox.
Security patrol is directly confirmed in the public remarks. This is also consistent with the building context indicating security personnel.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 5 listings explicitly mention unit-level AC, including window air conditioners, bedroom/living-room A/C, and approved AC units; current MLS data also shows ACWIUN in 7 of 20 listings. The repeated detailed references across different remarks strongly indicate that window/room AC is available in the building, rather than being a single copied checkbox error.
Nineteen of 20 listings identify concrete in the construction materials, and one listing explicitly states "solid concrete construction." This is strong, repeated building-level evidence across the MLS data and is consistent with the prior high-confidence determination.
Five listings contain the DOUWAL checkbox, yet none of the many public remarks describe double-wall construction. The checkbox appears potentially copied or unverified, while the stronger building-level evidence supports concrete construction rather than specifically double-wall construction.
Public remarks do not support hollow-tile construction, and the current MLS pattern is overwhelmingly concrete (19 of 20) with only a small minority checking HOLTIL. Because no remarks reference hollow tile and concrete is repeatedly confirmed, the hollow-tile flag appears to be an MLS inconsistency rather than a genuine building attribute.
Three listings contain the MASSTU construction checkbox, but no public remarks mention masonry or stucco construction. Because the evidence is limited to a small minority of MLS entries and lacks independent remark confirmation, this feature is not supported.
No analysis available
Seven MLS entries check SLAB, but the extensive public remarks contain no references to a concrete slab or solid concrete foundation. Without remark support, the minority checkbox evidence is not sufficient to validate this feature.
No analysis available
No public remarks support wood-frame construction, while the dominant building description is concrete. With only 2 of 20 MLS entries checking WOOFRA and repeated concrete references, wood-frame is unlikely to be a genuine building feature. This is best treated as a false/erroneous MLS flag.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for short-term-rental terminology and rental restrictions. No allowance or authorization was identified; under the no-evidence rule, STR is treated as false with medium-low confidence.
The referenced pools are standard association swimming pools, not hotel rental pools. Because STR is not established or allowed and no hotel program is described, this value is false.
No mandatory rental-pool requirement appears in the remarks. Since STR and hotel-pool participation are not established, mandatory hotel-pool participation must be false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for leasehold and land-tenure language, including lease-expiry and renewal dates. No specific four-digit lease-expiry year was found, so the value remains unknown.
The building is repeatedly described as VA-approved and eligible for VA financing across numerous listings. This consistent, explicit evidence supports a very high-confidence true value.
I searched for 'fully insured,' 'full insurance,' 'comprehensive building insurance,' 'fully covered insurance,' and 'walls-in coverage.' No qualifying insurance language appears in the remarks.
No analysis available
I searched for terms including FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, and passed fire inspection. None were found; references to smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors do not establish that the building passed an FLSE.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 3 listings explicitly mention mountain views, including “Mountain views,” “peaceful mountain and lush green views,” and “lanai with a mountain view.” This supports the already high-confidence MLS evidence and indicates mountain-view units are available in the building, rather than a single isolated or copy-pasted claim.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly describe garden-related views, including “peaceful garden views,” “lush tropical greenery,” “green garden and monkeypod trees,” and “garden view oasis.” The repeated descriptions across different listings, together with the high-confidence MLS history, confirm that garden-view units are offered in the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings mention sunset or western/exposure views. MLS view_descriptions currently show 0/20 with 'SUNSET' and some explicit 'NONE' entries; public remarks across the listings instead reference 'treetop', 'garden', 'mountain' or 'sunrise' views but never 'sunset' or 'evening sun'. Given prior Low confidence and consistent absence of sunset language across multiple agents' remarks and the MLS, set view_sunset = false.
No analysis available
The reviewed remarks describe natural and green-space views only. No listing states that Friday night fireworks can be viewed from a unit, lanai, or the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building has strong, repeated evidence of a resident manager: 14 of 20 current listings include the RESMAN amenity. Several remarks independently state “on-site resident manager,” “resident manager,” or “dedicated resident manager,” confirming this is a building-level feature rather than an isolated or unsupported checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.