University Villa
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
University Villa
Building Overview
University Villa in McCully-Moiliili — concrete building (1976) with Diamond Head views and a resident manager.
About University Villa
University Villa is located in the McCully-Moiliili neighborhood and was built in 1976. Size information (unit mix/square footage) is not provided in the available MLS data. The building is of concrete construction and is noted to have Diamond Head views in some units according to MLS records.
Key features reported in MLS data include an on-site resident manager. No additional common-area amenities are listed in the provided records. Information about management company or association details is listed as unknown in the MLS data.
According to available MLS records, parking is available and assigned. Pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted per the MLS information. Buyers should verify all building details, rules, fees and availability with the seller, management or association, as this narrative is based solely on the MLS data provided.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy percentages and descriptive phrases such as "80% owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied." The remarks do not provide any owner-occupancy data, so the percentage cannot be determined from this evidence.
I searched the remarks for an explicit elevator count such as "4 elevators," "multiple elevators," or similar wording. The listings confirm the building has elevators and that they were updated, but none provide a numeric count, so the exact number remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing clearly states common area electricity is included in the maintenance fee. Several remarks mention 'common elements' or 'common area maintenance,' but that is not the same as explicit common-area electric coverage, so this remains unconfirmed.
No analysis available
Electricity is explicitly mentioned in many separate public remarks, including phrases like 'Maintenance fees include electricity' and 'Maintenance Fee includes electricity.' The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, matching the strong MLS pattern.
No analysis available
Hot water is explicitly named in several remarks as part of the maintenance fee package. While some MLS records also show WTRHTR in inclusions, the public remarks here consistently say hot water is included, which strongly supports the feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is one of the most consistently confirmed utilities in the remarks, with multiple listings explicitly stating it is included. This aligns with the very strong MLS pattern and appears reliable across agents.
Water is explicitly included in numerous remarks and is supported by the strong MLS history. The phrasing is consistent across listings, making this a high-confidence building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the 14 listings reviewed, zero public remarks explicitly mention a trash chute, garbage chute, or refuse chute. The only evidence is the minority MLS amenity checkbox (2/14), which is weak and appears inconsistent with the otherwise detailed amenity descriptions, so I would not treat trash chute as a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Community laundry is strongly supported. Multiple current listings explicitly say "community laundry," "the nice clean laundry room is right there," "community laundry on site," and "on-site community laundry." This appears consistent across many listings and agents, not just copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 12/12 current MLS entries indicate a parking option and none indicate 'no parking'. At least 5 listings explicitly mention a parking stall included with the unit, confirming that the building provides parking for residents across multiple agents and time frames.
Assigned parking is strongly supported across multiple listings. At least several remarks explicitly say '1 assigned parking stall,' 'assigned parking,' or 'designated parking stall,' and the MLS data shows 10/14 listings with assigned parking checked. The consistency across listings suggests this is a real building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
Covered parking is supported by multiple listings that specifically mention 'covered parking stall' and 'parking stall in the garage.' The MLS data also shows 5/14 listings with covered parking-related indicators, matching the remarks. This appears to be a genuine building amenity rather than a transient agent checkbox.
The listings consistently describe assigned, dedicated, or covered parking stalls, which shows parking is included or assigned to the unit. However, none of the remarks explicitly say the parking is deeded or owned with the unit, so this cannot be confirmed.
No analysis available
I searched for any mention of parking rent, monthly parking cost, or additional parking charge and found none. The remarks refer to parking stalls being assigned or included, but do not state a separate fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for language about a parking waitlist, parking waiting list, or joining a waitlist for parking and found nothing. The remarks instead describe assigned parking stalls, which suggests immediate parking availability for these listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS data: 14 of 14 current listings flag CONCRE. While the remarks do not usually spell out the structure, nothing in the listing remarks contradicts concrete construction, and the consistency across all listings makes this highly reliable.
Double-wall construction appears inconsistently in the MLS materials field, with 6 of 14 listings checking DOUWAL. The remarks are silent on this feature, so this looks like a possible MLS copy/paste item rather than a clearly verified building trait, though it may still apply to some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete slab foundation is supported by a subset of the current MLS listings, with 5 of 14 marking SLAB. The remarks do not explicitly confirm it, but they also do not contradict it, so this is a plausible building-level feature with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Above-ground construction is only lightly supported by the MLS data, with 2 of 14 listings marked ABOGRO. Because the remarks never mention this feature and there is no corroborating detail, confidence is low and this may be an unchecked or copied MLS attribute.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for evidence that short-term rentals are allowed, such as STR permitted, vacation rental allowed, NUC, or TVU, and found none. There is also no wording suggesting 30-day minimums or owner-occupant-only restrictions, so based on the remarks alone this remains unconfirmed and is treated as not evidenced.
I looked for references to hotel rental pools or hotel-managed rental programs such as Hilton, Ritz, or Trump pool participation and found none. Because there is no evidence that STR is allowed either, hotel pool participation is not supported by the remarks.
I searched for language stating owners must participate in a rental program, must be in a hotel pool, or cannot opt out, and found nothing. Since there is no evidence of a hotel pool or STR allowance, mandatory pool participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold language such as lease expires, ground lease ends, renewed through, or a 4-digit expiry year, but found nothing. There is no evidence in the remarks to identify a lease expiration date.
I searched the public remarks for any reference to VA loan eligibility or VA-approved status and found none. The listings focus on unit features, parking, views, and building updates, but do not mention financing options.
I searched the remarks for language indicating the HOA provides full or walls-in insurance coverage. The listings do not mention insurance coverage at all, so there is no evidence that the building is fully insured from the remarks.
No analysis available
I looked for references to fire/life safety evaluation passed, FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection. There were no such mentions in the public remarks, so I cannot verify this as a positive building feature.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Diamond Head views are clearly a building-level feature for this property. At least 11 of 14 MLS listings show DIAHEA, and the remarks repeatedly and specifically describe 'stunning Diamond Head views' and 'unobstructed views of Diamond Head' from multiple units. The consistency across listings suggests this is not a one-off or copy-paste error.
City views appear to be available in this building based on MLS data: 11 of 14 listings include CITY, with only 2 showing NONE. The public remarks do not explicitly call out cityscape views, but the repeated town/downtown location language and the MLS view coding support this feature for some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no meaningful evidence that this building offers golf course views. The MLS data shows only 1 of 14 listings with GOLCOU, and no remarks reference a golf course or fairway view. Based on the absence of supporting remarks and the very sparse MLS signal, this feature is best treated as not present.
No analysis available
There is insufficient evidence that the building offers sunrise views as a recognized feature. Only 2 of 14 listings include SUNRIS in MLS data, and the public remarks do not mention sunrise, morning sun, or eastern exposure. This appears weak and likely not reliable enough to include.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is confirmed in many current public remarks for University Villa, with phrases like “resident manager,” “on-site resident manager,” and “resident manager lives in the building.” The feature appears consistently across a large share of listings and is reinforced by the historical MLS data, so this is strong building-level evidence rather than a one-off agent note.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.