Ulu Wehi
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Ulu Wehi
Building Overview
Ulu Wehi, Waianae Coast — wood-frame building (1974) with mountain views and assigned parking. Pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Ulu Wehi
Based on MLS data, Ulu Wehi is a wood-frame building located on the Waianae Coast built in 1974. Size and unit mix are not specified in the available MLS records.
Key features reported in MLS data include mountain views. The building's construction type is listed as wood frame. Management company information is not provided in the MLS data.
According to available records, assigned parking is available. Pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. Buyers should verify all details, including fees, unit sizes, and management arrangements, with the listing agent or management prior to purchase.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for owner-occupancy indicators such as '80% owner occupied,' 'majority owner occupied,' or similar phrases, and found none. Some remarks mention owner-occupants and investors as possible buyers, but that is not the same as a stated occupancy percentage.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator references such as 'elevator,' '4 elevators,' 'four elevators,' or 'multiple elevators,' but found none. The listings describe townhomes/duplexes with carports and yards, but do not mention building vertical transportation.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common area electricity appears to be included for this building. The current MLS data shows 14 of 20 listings marked with OTCOEX, while the public remarks do not explicitly discuss utility inclusions, suggesting the MLS checkbox pattern is driving the evidence rather than copy-pasted marketing language.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water does not appear to be included in maintenance fees for this building. Only 1 of 20 current MLS listings shows HOTWAT, while 13 of 20 list WTRHTR, which is a strong contrary indicator. The public remarks contain no references to hot water inclusion, so the MLS pattern points clearly away from this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox CLUHOU appears in 4 of 20 current listings, but none of the provided public remarks (0 listings) mention a clubhouse, community center, or recreation center. The limited and inconsistent checkbox presence across agents suggests possible copy/paste rather than a confirmed shared amenity; historical data previously flagged the feature, so it is included here with moderate confidence (4 listings showing CLUHOU, 0 remarks confirming).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence supports patio/deck amenities across multiple listings. At least 4-6 remarks explicitly mention a covered patio, private patio, front courtyard, or similar outdoor living space, and the language appears in several separate listings rather than a single copy-paste remark. This aligns with the previously high-confidence MLS data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is overwhelming evidence for private yard space in this building. Roughly a dozen current remarks reference fenced, enclosed, private, or gated yard areas, and multiple listings describe both front and back outdoor spaces suitable for pets, gardening, or entertaining. The consistency across many listings strongly supports this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is supported by repeated evidence across the building’s listings. Multiple remarks explicitly mention storage-related features, including "2 storagae closets," "ample storage," and "LOTS of storage," which aligns with the strong historical MLS pattern (11/20 amenities and 12/20 unit features). This appears to be a real building/unit feature, not just isolated marketing language.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Eight of 20 current MLS listings list WASHER/DRYER in the inclusions, and at least one public remark explicitly states “Refrigerator and washer/dryer to be delivered soon.” While not present in most remarks (agents sometimes copy/paste appliance info), the repeated inclusion across multiple listings indicates that some units in the building offer in‑unit laundry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across listings that the building provides parking: 16 of 20 current MLS entries include parking codes and multiple agent remarks mention '2 car carport', 'two dedicated parking stalls', 'parking stalls conveniently located right outside your front door', and 'detached/attached carport'. Mentions appear across many different listings and agents, indicating this is a building-level feature rather than a single-agent copy/paste error.
Multiple unit descriptions explicitly state assigned or dedicated parking—examples include repeated phrases like 'two dedicated parking stalls', '2 dedicated carport parking spaces', and 'dedicated parking stalls directly in front.' While ASSIGN appears in 6 of 20 MLS parking_features entries, the consistent phrasing in many public remarks supports that assigned/reserved parking is offered for units.
Covered parking is strongly supported across the building: multiple listings explicitly describe carports, covered parking, and garage-type parking. At least several independent remarks mention it rather than relying only on checkbox data, so this appears to be a real building feature rather than a copy-paste error. The evidence is consistent with the existing high-confidence historical record.
I searched for explicit deeded-parking wording and found none. The listings describe dedicated stalls and carports, but that is not the same as deeded/owned parking.
No analysis available
I looked for parking fee language such as monthly parking charge or parking rental and found nothing. The remarks discuss parking availability, but not any separate parking cost.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist references and found none. The public remarks focus on dedicated stalls/carports rather than a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 3 of 20 current MLS listings list 'CONCRE' historically, but none of the public remarks reference 'concrete', 'reinforced concrete', or similar. No owner/agent verification or explicit remark confirms concrete construction; the minority checkbox presence across listings appears inconsistent and likely copy/paste, so there is low confidence that the building is concrete.
Double-wall construction appears in 14 of 20 current MLS listings as DOUWAL. Public remarks do not explicitly mention “double wall” or “two walls,” but the MLS data is consistent across many listings and suggests this is a genuine building feature rather than a one-off checkbox.
No analysis available
Only 3 of 20 MLS listings historically listed 'MASSTU' (masonry & stucco), yet the combined public remarks contain no mentions of 'masonry' or 'stucco'. With no explicit agent/owner verification and inconsistent checkbox usage across listings, the evidence for masonry & stucco construction is weak and likely due to agent data entry inconsistencies.
No analysis available
8 of 20 MLS listings include 'SLAB' in construction_materials and prior confidence was Medium (7 of 19). There are no explicit remarks about a concrete slab foundation, but the repeated MLS checkbox usage across several listings provides moderate implied evidence; include the feature with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
Wood frame construction appears in 10 of 20 current MLS listings as WOOFRA. No public remarks explicitly say “wood frame” or “wood frame construction,” so the evidence comes from the MLS material field and looks moderately consistent rather than independently verified in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR-related terms like vacation rental, NUC, TVU, and STR permitted, but found no evidence. Because there is no public remark indicating STR is allowed, this is set to false.
I looked for hotel pool or hotel-managed rental program references and found none. Since STR is not supported by the remarks, this must also be false.
I searched for mandatory rental-pool language such as must participate or cannot opt out and found nothing. With no evidence of STR allowance, a mandatory pool is also false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The strongest and most repeated lease-expiry information in the remarks points to 2055. I used the most recent/extended date mentioned, consistent with the lease-extension guidance.
The public remarks directly say VA financing is available/eligible, which is strong evidence that the building is VA loan approved. I found explicit VA language rather than an inference from other financing types.
I searched for insurance-related phrases like 'fully insured,' 'walls-in coverage,' 'full insurance,' or 'comprehensive building insurance,' but found no matches. The remarks discuss lease terms, financing, and assessments, but do not state that the HOA provides full or walls-in coverage.
No analysis available
I looked for fire/life safety compliance language such as 'FLSE passed,' 'fire safety certified,' 'passed fire inspection,' or similar wording, and found none. There is no public remark evidence that this building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are well supported across the listings: 16 of 20 current MLS records list MOUNTA in view_descriptions, and several public remarks explicitly mention 'Waianae mountain views' or 'beautiful mountain views.' This appears to be consistent building-level availability rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is little support for garden views in the public remarks: none of the listings explicitly describe garden, courtyard, or landscaped views. Although 2 of 20 current MLS records show GARDEN in view_descriptions, the absence of corroborating remarks suggests this is likely inconsistent MLS entry rather than a reliable building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the listing set, there is no direct evidence of sunset views from the building: 0 of 20 MLS view descriptions include SUNSET, and 5 explicitly say NONE. One remark references “gorgeous sunsets” at nearby beaches, but that is location marketing rather than a building view feature, so the available evidence supports false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager appears to be a real building-level feature, supported by historical MLS data and at least one explicit public remark. One listing specifically states Ulu Wehi “includes a Resident Manager for added security,” which aligns with the RESMAN amenity checked in multiple recent listings. The evidence looks consistent and not like a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.