Town Homes at Frwys Edge 4
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Town Homes at Frwys Edge 4
Building Overview
Town Homes at Frwys Edge 4 in Ewa — built 2007, steel frame construction; on-site pool and BBQ area.
About Town Homes at Frwys Edge 4
Town Homes at Frwys Edge 4 is a residential complex located in Ewa. According to available records, the community was built in 2007 and is constructed with a steel frame. Size and unit mix information are not provided in the MLS data.
The community's listed amenities include a pool and a BBQ area. Units are served by central air conditioning. These are the primary shared features reported in the MLS data.
Parking is reported as covered with additional guest parking. Pets are allowed, and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all details, including fees, exact unit sizes, and management arrangements, with the listing agent or management company.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Both current listings support common-area electricity being included: 2 of 2 have OTCOEX in the fee inclusions field. The remarks do not contradict this and reference shared amenities, which fits a building-level utility inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Neither current listing indicates hot water is included in the maintenance fee, and both instead list WTRHTR, a strong sign the units have their own water heaters. No remarks mention hot water being provided by the building, so the best read is that hot water is not included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
2 of 2 current MLS listings state that sewer is included in the association fees via the SEWER item in association_fee_includes. The public remarks do not describe utilities, but they also do not contradict this inclusion. The consistent MLS data across all available listings strongly supports that sewer charges are covered by the maintenance fees.
2 of 2 current MLS listings indicate WATER in the association_fee_includes field, implying that water service is paid through the maintenance fees. Although the remarks focus on layout and amenities rather than utilities, they do not conflict with this data. With all current listings aligned, it is very likely that water is included in the HOA fees.
Strong evidence supports BBQ amenities for the building. Both current listings mark BBQ in MLS, and one remark directly references the shared "private BBQ/pool/jacuzzi area," which matches a building-level amenity rather than a unit-only feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Both current listings for this building have the patio/deck amenity (PATDEC/COVPAT) checked in the MLS, suggesting a consistent building/unit feature rather than a one-off error. The remarks focus on the yard and extended outdoor living space but do not explicitly say 'patio' or 'deck', so this is inferred primarily from structured MLS data rather than description text.
The building appears to offer a walking/jogging path based on MLS: both available listings include WAJOPA. While the public remarks do not mention the path directly, the across-the-board MLS selection makes this a solid building-level amenity.
No analysis available
2 of 2 current listings mention private yard space, with explicit language such as 'private fenced in yard' and 'private, enclosed, and landscaped yard.' The wording is consistent across listings and reads like direct listing copy rather than an ambiguous inference, strongly confirming this building offers private yard space.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no supporting language in the remarks for a recreation room, and the MLS evidence is weak because only one of two listings has RECROO selected. That pattern is consistent with possible copy/paste or unverified agent input rather than a confirmed shared amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is mentioned in 1 of the 2 current remarks, with one listing noting a "two-car garage with extra storage space." Historical MLS data also had 1/2 listings showing storage in unit features, while 0/2 showed it in building amenities, suggesting this is more likely unit-level storage than a shared building locker. The evidence is moderate and consistent enough to include for buyers searching for storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is supported by both current MLS amenities and public remarks. One listing specifically references a "private BBQ/pool/jacuzzi area," and the current MLS data indicates pool-related amenities in 2 of 2 entries. Evidence is strong and consistent, so the building should be marked as having a pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Laundry in unit is strongly supported. One listing explicitly says 'new washer and dryer,' and the MLS history shows 2/2 current listings include washer/dryer in the inclusions. This looks consistent across listings rather than a one-off agent checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Covered parking is strongly supported across both current listings. One remark says the home has a "detached 2 car garage" and another notes "a two-car garage with extra storage space," so this is not just checkbox-only data. The evidence is consistent and appears to be confirmed by the listing remarks, not copied blindly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Guest parking is clearly available for the building. Both current listings have the guest parking checkbox marked, and one remark directly states it is "located close to guest parking." With both MLS data and remarks aligned, this is strong evidence rather than a likely copy-paste error.
Secured-entry parking is inconsistently reported, with just 1/2 listings checking the SECENT box and no remarks referencing gated or secure parking access. Given the lack of textual confirmation and partial MLS support, this appears to be a mistaken checkbox rather than an actual building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Central AC is clearly supported by both current listings: 2/2 remarks explicitly mention 'central AC.' This is consistent with the historical MLS data showing ACCEN/CENAC in unit features and ACCEN in inclusions, so the evidence appears strong rather than a copy-paste checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of the two current MLS listings marks the building as concrete construction. The public remarks do not explicitly restate construction type, so this is supported mainly by the MLS data rather than agent commentary.
Both current MLS listings list double wall construction, making this a highly consistent building-level feature. The remarks do not mention wall type, but nothing suggests the MLS data is incorrect.
No analysis available
One of the two current MLS listings includes masonry/stucco construction in the materials field. The public remarks are silent on exterior construction, so this remains supported by the MLS entry only.
Both current MLS listings identify the building as steel frame construction. This is strong, consistent evidence across both listings, and there is no sign of a copy-paste error or contradiction in the remarks.
All current MLS listings indicate a slab foundation. The remarks focus on interior upgrades and amenities, so the slab designation is supported by the MLS data and remains unchallenged.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least one current listing explicitly notes a "landscaped yard with a garden view," confirming that some units enjoy garden views. MLS view_descriptions are split (1/2 show GARDEN, 1/2 show NONE), consistent with only some units having this view. Since buyers searching for garden views would be interested in units here, the building is marked as having garden views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Neither of the 2 listings mentions sunset views; both MLS view fields are NONE. The remarks instead describe a "garden view" and do not include any sunset, western exposure, or evening-sun wording, so there is no evidence this building offers sunset views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.