Town Homes at Fairways Edge
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Town Homes at Fairways Edge
Building Overview
Town Homes at Fairways Edge in Ewa — steel-frame townhomes (2008) with central AC and pool.
About Town Homes at Fairways Edge
Based on MLS data, Town Homes at Fairways Edge is a townhome community located in the Ewa neighborhood. The community was built in 2008 and is constructed with a steel frame. Specific unit sizes and counts are not provided in the available MLS information.
According to available records, the development offers mountain views and on-site amenities that include a pool and a BBQ area. Units are equipped with central air conditioning.
Additional details from the MLS indicate covered parking is available. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Buyers should verify all information, including HOA fees, unit counts, and management details, with the listing agent or applicable records.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for owner-occupancy clues such as exact percentages, "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied," but the remarks do not provide any ownership-rate information. Based on the listings alone, owner occupancy cannot be determined.
I searched the public remarks for elevator-related terms such as "elevators," "lifts," "multiple elevators," and explicit counts, but found nothing. The listings repeatedly describe townhomes with detached garages and split-level or single-level layouts, which do not indicate building elevators.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence supports common area electricity being included. The current MLS data is near-unanimous at 19/20 listings with OTCOEX checked, and the public remarks consistently reference shared amenities and maintained common areas across many listings. This looks like a stable building feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current listings show HOTWAT in association_fee_includes, and most instead show WTRHTR. Public remarks repeatedly mention individual water heaters, including phrases like 'new hot water heater' and 'new water heater installed,' which is a strong sign the building does not supply hot water. This is consistent across many listings and appears to be a real building characteristic rather than copy-paste MLS noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence does not support sewer being included in the HOA/maintenance fee. One listing explicitly says, "Water and sewer are sub-metered and billed based on usage," which is the strongest clue and points to separate billing rather than inclusion. The remaining remarks do not contradict that statement, so sewer should be treated as not included.
Water inclusion appears inconsistent in MLS, but the best public evidence says it is not included: "Water and sewer are sub-metered and billed based on usage." Since other remarks generally do not mention water being included, the balance of evidence supports water as separately billed. This is more consistent with a copy-paste MLS issue than a building-wide included utility.
Strong building-level evidence across many listings confirms BBQ/grilling facilities. Remarks consistently reference 'BBQ area,' 'BBQ grills,' 'BBQ cabanas,' and 'barbecue areas,' indicating this is not a copy-paste anomaly. This amenity appears throughout the community and is well-supported by both MLS data and public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no supporting evidence in the public remarks for a car wash facility. Unlike BBQ, pool, or hot tub, no listing text references a car wash station, vehicle wash area, or auto wash, and the MLS signal is very sparse (1/20). Based on the available evidence, this feature appears unlikely to exist as a shared building amenity.
There is solid evidence of a clubhouse/community-center type amenity in the building. Multiple remarks mention a 'clubhouse' or 'community center,' matching the MLS amenity data in several listings. While not universal across all units, the feature is clearly advertised by enough listings to include.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence supports patio/deck features in this building. Across many listings, agents describe "covered lanai," "covered patio," "back lanai," and "private covered lanai," suggesting this is a common building/unit feature rather than a one-off copy-paste error. The current remarks consistently reinforce the historical MLS data.
The community clearly offers walking/jogging paths. Remarks repeatedly describe 'walking paths,' 'walking/jogging paths,' and 'jogging paths,' and the MLS amenity appears in about half of the listings. This is consistent across multiple agents and strongly supports the feature.
No analysis available
Very strong evidence supports private yard space in this building. Multiple remarks from different listings explicitly mention "private, fenced-in yard," "private enclosed yard," "private yard," "fenced yard," and "private outdoor space," which aligns with the strong historical MLS pattern. The consistency across many agents suggests this is a real building-level feature, not just checkbox noise.
No analysis available
The building/community clearly offers a recreation area or rec center. Several remarks directly reference a 'rec center' or 'recreation area,' and the MLS amenity appears in multiple listings, which supports this as a real shared feature rather than a checkbox mistake. The evidence is consistent across different listings and agents.
I did not find any remarks describing a recreation room, game room, or entertainment room in the listings reviewed. Because the feature appears in only a minority of MLS records and is absent from the public descriptions, confidence is high that it is not a reliably advertised building amenity. If it exists at all, it is not supported by the current remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is supported by many remarks across the building, not just MLS checkboxes. Multiple listings explicitly mention "extra storage" in the garage, "ample storage," "plenty of storage space," and other storage solutions, with the historical MLS data also showing storage marked in both amenities and unit features on a meaningful share of listings. This is strong evidence that storage units/locker-style storage or extra storage space is available in the building or in some units.
I looked for explicit surfboard storage, surf storage, or combined board-storage amenities. The listings mention surfing nearby, wave pools, and beach access, but there is no evidence of dedicated surfboard storage in the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Whirlpool/hot tub/spa is strongly supported by the remarks. Multiple listings describe amenities such as “hot tub,” “jacuzzi,” “spa,” and even “whirlpool,” often alongside pool and BBQ areas, indicating this is a real shared amenity in the community. The remarks are consistent across many agents, so this looks legitimate rather than copy/paste noise.
The building/community clearly has a swimming pool. Pool access is mentioned in a very large number of listings, with repeated references such as "community pool," "resort-style pool," "private gated swimming pool," and "heated swimming pool." The evidence is consistent across many different listings and appears to be broadly confirmed rather than copy-paste error.
Limited but explicit evidence: one listing explicitly states "heated swimming pool" and one MLS listing flags HEAPOO, while most other remarks mention a pool or hot tub without stating heating. Evidence is therefore present but limited to a small number of listings/agents.
I looked for descriptions like saltwater pool, salt pool, or saline pool. The public remarks consistently mention a pool, hot tub, spa, or resort-style amenities, but never identify the pool as saltwater.
Strong building-level evidence supports in-unit laundry. Across many current listings, agents explicitly mention washer/dryer or a dedicated laundry room, and the historical MLS data is already high confidence at 18/20 listings. The consistency across multiple remarks suggests this is a real feature, not just copy-paste checkbox noise.
No analysis available
I looked for terms like coin laundry, paid laundry, quarters, card-op, or laundry fees. The listings do not describe any paid common laundry system; instead, they reference private washers and dryers in units or garages.
I searched for references to community laundry on each floor, floor-by-floor laundry rooms, or any shared laundry facility in the building. The remarks only mention in-unit laundry, washer/dryer in the garage, or laundry room language tied to specific homes, not a communal laundry amenity.
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly state each unit includes a private 2-car garage (phrases like "private two-car garage", "detached 2-car garage", "attached 2-car garage")—this appears across the majority of unit remarks. While only 2/20 MLS parking_features currently show ASSIGN, the consistent language in many agent remarks indicates assigned/reserved garage parking is provided to units.
Covered parking is strongly confirmed across the building. Dozens of remarks mention a "2-car garage," "detached 2 car garage," "attached 2-car garage," or "enclosed garage," indicating this is a consistent building feature rather than a copy-paste error. The current remarks fully support the existing high-confidence MLS data.
I looked for explicit deeded-parking language such as deeded parking, owned stall, parking included in deed, or owned parking. The remarks consistently describe the home as having its own garage, which supports unit-specific parking, but there is no direct deeded-parking statement.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee, monthly parking charge, add-on stall cost, and parking rental language. No separate parking cost appears in the listings; the remarks only reference garages, guest parking, and parking permits.
Guest parking is well supported by the remarks, with many listings explicitly stating guest parking is available nearby or directly across from the unit. Several descriptions mention multiple guest stalls, parking permits, or ample guest/street parking, suggesting a shared community amenity. The evidence is strong across multiple agents and appears consistent rather than incidental.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist, waiting list, or join the waitlist for parking. The listings instead mention private garages, guest parking, and parking permits, but nothing suggests a parking waitlist system.
No analysis available
I searched for key card access, fob entry, card reader systems, or other electronic access language. The remarks mention security patrol, gated areas, and security systems, but not a card-based building access system.
No analysis available
The public remarks directly and repeatedly confirm security patrol service in the community. One listing even specifies an active 24/7 security patrol, which is strong evidence for this feature.
No analysis available
Central AC is strongly supported across the building. Multiple listings explicitly mention it in remarks, with at least a dozen phrases such as 'central AC,' 'new Air Conditioning,' 'newer central a/c system (2019),' and 'new central air conditioning unit was recently installed,' which suggests this is not just checkbox copy-paste. Historical MLS data also strongly supports it, so this feature should be included with very high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
7 of 20 current MLS records list 'concrete' in construction_materials but zero public remarks mention concrete (no phrases like 'concrete construction' or 'reinforced concrete'). Evidence is weak and inconsistent across agents, so concrete construction is not supported by the public remarks.
Double wall construction is supported by 18 of 20 current MLS listings, making it the strongest of the three features. None of the public remarks explicitly mention it, which is consistent with a building-level MLS checkbox being reused across listings. This is high-confidence building evidence and should be retained.
No analysis available
A minority of current MLS records (5 of 20) list masonry/stucco construction. No public remarks explicitly reference masonry or stucco, so this feature is supported only by the MLS material field and may reflect inconsistent agent entry.
Steel frame construction appears in 17 of 20 current MLS entries, which is strong building-level evidence. The public remarks do not mention it explicitly, suggesting agents may be copying MLS construction data rather than describing the structure in the remarks. Still, the current MLS majority supports including it for buyers searching for steel frame buildings.
Concrete slab construction appears in 9 of 20 current MLS entries, so there is some support but not a clear majority. No public remarks mention a concrete slab or solid concrete foundation, so this looks like a lower-confidence MLS feature rather than a remark-confirmed fact. It should still be included for buyers searching for slab construction, but with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
A small minority (3 of 20) of MLS records indicate wood frame construction, but none of the public remarks mention 'wood frame'. The lack of corroborating remarks across many listings suggests this is unlikely to be a verified building-level feature.
3 of 20 MLS entries include 'above ground' in construction_materials but zero public remarks mention above-ground construction. The sparse MLS checks and absence in remarks make this feature unsupported by public text.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental allowed, STR permitted, legal vacation rental, NUC, TVU, and minimum-stay clues like 30-day minimum. Nothing in the public remarks indicates STRs are allowed, so the safest read from the remarks is that STR is not allowed.
I looked for hotel pool language such as Hilton/Trump/Ritz-style rental pools or hotel-managed operations and found nothing. Since there is no STR evidence in the remarks, this must remain false.
I searched for mandatory pool participation, required rental-program language, or any indication that owners must participate in a hotel pool, and found none. With no STR or hotel-pool evidence, this is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like lease expires, ground lease ends, leasehold, lease expiry year, and renewal dates such as extended through 2075 or 2080. Nothing in the public remarks indicates this is a leasehold property or provides a 4-digit lease expiration year.
The public remarks repeatedly advertise VA assumable financing and VA loan assumption options, which is strong evidence for VA financing availability. This is mentioned many times across listings, making the signal very clear.
I searched for HOA insurance language like "fully insured," "full insurance," "walls-in coverage," and similar phrases, but found no evidence in the remarks. The listings discuss amenities, parking, and yard features, but not building insurance coverage.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit fire/life safety language such as "FLSE passed," "fire life safety evaluation passed," "fire safety certified," or similar wording, but there were no matches. Nothing in the remarks confirms a passed fire/life safety evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 2 listings explicitly mention mountain views, with quotes such as “garden, mountain views!” and “mountain and two separate water views.” Historical data indicated High confidence for mountain views, and current remarks from multiple agents corroborate that some units/buildings offer mountain vistas rather than being a single copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Garden/courtyard/landscaped views or settings are mentioned in many listings, not just one-off remarks. Key phrases include "garden views," "private courtyard," "garden-like setting," "landscaped backyard," and "lush, park-like community," which is consistent with the historical high-confidence signal. The evidence appears across multiple agents and is reinforced by the current MLS view data, so this feature should remain included.
Numerous listings (at least 10–15) reference golf course frontage/views (phrases include “golf course frontage,” “overlooking the golf course,” “private gate to Hoakalei Golf Course,” and references to lanais facing the course). Evidence is consistent across many agent remarks, indicating the building offers golf course views for some units.
No analysis available
No listings in the provided public remarks mention sunrise, morning sun, or eastern exposure. Current MLS checkbox data indicates SUNRIS is unchecked across listings and there is no agent language indicating new sunrise views, so there is strong evidence the building does not offer sunrise-facing views.
Strong evidence that Town Homes at Fairways Edge offers sunset views in some units. At least several listings explicitly say "sunset views," "breathtaking sunset views," "gorgeous sunsets," or "golden sunsets," often tied to golf course frontage and western-facing lanais. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents and is not just copy-paste MLS checkbox data.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit fireworks-view language such as watching fireworks from a lanai, balcony, or unit. The remarks mention sunsets, golf course frontage, water views, and nearby Wai Kai activities, but nothing that confirms fireworks views from the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No remarks in this set support an on-site/resident manager, despite a few MLS amenity checkboxes showing RESMAN. The evidence pattern is weak and appears inconsistent with the remarks, which repeatedly describe amenities like pool, BBQ, and security patrol but never a manager on property. Based on the public remarks, this feature is not substantiated for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.