Town Homes at Fairways Edge
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Town Homes at Fairways Edge
Building Overview
Town Homes at Fairways Edge in Ewa — steel-frame townhomes (2008) with central AC and pool.
About Town Homes at Fairways Edge
Based on MLS data, Town Homes at Fairways Edge is a townhome community located in the Ewa neighborhood. The community was built in 2008 and is constructed with a steel frame. Specific unit sizes and counts are not provided in the available MLS information.
According to available records, the development offers mountain views and on-site amenities that include a pool and a BBQ area. Units are equipped with central air conditioning.
Additional details from the MLS indicate covered parking is available. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Buyers should verify all information, including HOA fees, unit counts, and management details, with the listing agent or applicable records.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for owner-occupancy clues such as exact percentages, "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied," but none appear in the remarks. The listings repeatedly mention amenities and occupancy-friendly features, yet provide no direct owner-occupancy percentage or equivalent statement.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator language such as "elevators," "lifts," "multiple elevators," or a stated count, but found none. The listings describe townhomes with garages, yards, and community amenities, but nothing about elevator access.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence supports common area electricity being included. The current MLS data is near-unanimous at 19/20 listings with OTCOEX checked, and the public remarks consistently reference shared amenities and maintained common areas across many listings. This looks like a stable building feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current listings show HOTWAT in association fee inclusions, while most current listings instead include WTRHTR, a strong sign the building does not provide hot water as a fee-included amenity. Across the remarks, mentions are about unit-level equipment like 'new hot water heater' or 'water heater installed in 2021,' not building-supplied hot water. Evidence is consistent across many listings and appears to reflect standardized MLS copy-paste of unit appliances rather than a shared building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Public remarks do not support sewer being included in the HOA/maintenance fee. Only one listing explicitly states, 'Water and sewer are sub-metered and billed based on usage,' and the rest of the remarks are silent on sewer inclusion. Overall, the evidence points to the MLS checkbox being a copy/paste inconsistency rather than a real building feature.
Public remarks do not support water being included in the HOA/maintenance fee. The only direct mention says water is sub-metered and billed by usage, while the other listings do not mention water being covered. This looks inconsistent in MLS entries and not supported by the remarks across multiple agents.
BBQ/grilling facilities are strongly supported across many listings, with roughly all recent remarks mentioning them in some form. The language is consistent across multiple agents and appears to be genuine building-level amenity data rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no supporting evidence in the public remarks for a car wash facility. Unlike BBQ, pool, or hot tub, no listing text references a car wash station, vehicle wash area, or auto wash, and the MLS signal is very sparse (1/20). Based on the available evidence, this feature appears unlikely to exist as a shared building amenity.
There is solid evidence of a clubhouse/community-center type amenity in the building. Multiple remarks mention a 'clubhouse' or 'community center,' matching the MLS amenity data in several listings. While not universal across all units, the feature is clearly advertised by enough listings to include.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence supports patio/deck features in this building. Across many listings, agents describe "covered lanai," "covered patio," "back lanai," and "private covered lanai," suggesting this is a common building/unit feature rather than a one-off copy-paste error. The current remarks consistently reinforce the historical MLS data.
Walking/jogging path amenities are strongly confirmed by many listings. Multiple remarks independently reference 'walking paths' and similar phrases, indicating a shared community feature that is consistently described across agents.
No analysis available
Very strong evidence supports private yard space in this building. Multiple remarks from different listings explicitly mention "private, fenced-in yard," "private enclosed yard," "private yard," "fenced yard," and "private outdoor space," which aligns with the strong historical MLS pattern. The consistency across many agents suggests this is a real building-level feature, not just checkbox noise.
No analysis available
The community offers a recreation area/rec center. Multiple remarks explicitly mention "recreation area," "rec center," and "recreation center," which supports a real shared amenity even though it appears less frequently than BBQ or pool references.
There is moderate-to-strong evidence for a recreation room/recreation facility, with several listings mentioning 'rec room,' 'recreation area,' or 'rec center.' While not as consistently documented as BBQ or walking paths, the repeated references across multiple remarks suggest this is a real shared amenity rather than an MLS checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is supported by many remarks across the building, not just MLS checkboxes. At least several listings explicitly mention "extra storage," "ample storage," or garage storage, and the pattern appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a single copy-paste remark. This aligns with the historical MLS signal that storage units/lockers or extra storage are available in the building.
I looked for surfboard storage or related amenity language such as board storage and surf storage. The remarks reference nearby surfing and wave pool activities, but do not describe any surfboard storage facility in the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Whirlpool/hot tub/spa is clearly supported by the remarks. Listings mention "hot tub," "jacuzzi," "spa," and "whirlpool" across multiple agents, so this appears to be a genuine shared amenity rather than an MLS checkbox error.
Pool is strongly confirmed. Roughly all current listings reference it, with phrases like "community pool," "resort-style pool," "gated swimming pool," and "pool, spa, BBQ areas." The repeated mentions across many agents look consistent rather than copy-paste noise, and they align with the existing MLS amenity data.
Limited but explicit evidence: one listing explicitly states "heated swimming pool" and one MLS listing flags HEAPOO, while most other remarks mention a pool or hot tub without stating heating. Evidence is therefore present but limited to a small number of listings/agents.
I looked for terms such as saltwater pool, salt pool, or saline pool. The listings repeatedly mention a pool, spa, jacuzzi, or hot tub, but never identify the pool as salt water.
Strong, repeated evidence supports in-unit laundry for this building. Across many listings, agents explicitly mention 'washer, dryer,' 'in-unit laundry,' 'new washer and dryer,' and 'full size washer and dryer in the enclosed garage area,' which appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I looked for references to coin laundry, paid laundry, laundry fees, or card/quarter-operated machines. The remarks only describe private laundry appliances inside the units, so there is no evidence of a paid community laundry facility.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like laundry on each floor, shared laundry room, or floor-by-floor laundry access. The listings instead mention in-unit washer/dryer, laundry room, or laundry in the garage, which does not indicate a community laundry setup.
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly state each unit includes a private 2-car garage (phrases like "private two-car garage", "detached 2-car garage", "attached 2-car garage")—this appears across the majority of unit remarks. While only 2/20 MLS parking_features currently show ASSIGN, the consistent language in many agent remarks indicates assigned/reserved garage parking is provided to units.
Covered parking is strongly confirmed throughout the building. Across the remarks, dozens of listings mention a "2-car garage," "attached garage," "detached 2 car garage," or even "enclosed garage," showing this is not a one-off agent error but a consistent building feature.
I looked for wording like deeded parking, owned stall, parking included in the deed, or stall included with the unit, but the remarks only describe detached/attached 2-car garages, guest parking, and parking permits. That is useful for availability, but it does not explicitly confirm deeded parking.
No analysis available
I searched for monthly parking charges, parking rental fees, or any additional cost for parking and found none. The remarks discuss garages, guest parking, and permits, but do not mention a separate parking fee.
Guest parking is well supported across many listings and repeatedly appears in the public remarks. Multiple agents mention it in different ways—"guest parking nearby," "plenty of guest parking," "four guest parking stalls nearby," and "ampl[e] guest parking"—which strongly supports that this is a shared building/community feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist or waiting list system and found none. The listings instead suggest parking is readily available through garages and guest spaces, with no public evidence of a waitlist.
No analysis available
I searched for card/fob-based access language such as electronic entry, keycard access, or card reader security. The remarks mention security patrol and a security system in one listing, but not a card-access security system.
No analysis available
The remarks directly and repeatedly confirm security patrol service in the community, including an explicit 24/7 patrol reference. This is strong public-remark evidence for the feature.
No analysis available
Central AC is strongly supported for this building. Multiple listings explicitly mention it in remarks, with at least a dozen references such as "central AC," "newer central a/c system (2019)," "NEW Central Air Conditioner," and "new Air Conditioning," which looks consistent across many agents rather than a single copy-paste note. The historical MLS data also showed high confidence, so this feature should remain included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
7 of 20 current MLS records list 'concrete' in construction_materials but zero public remarks mention concrete (no phrases like 'concrete construction' or 'reinforced concrete'). Evidence is weak and inconsistent across agents, so concrete construction is not supported by the public remarks.
Double wall construction is strongly supported by the current MLS data pattern, with 19 of 20 listings showing DOUWAL in construction materials. None of the public remarks explicitly reference or dispute it, which suggests the MLS indicator is consistent across listings rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
No analysis available
A minority of current MLS records (5 of 20) list masonry/stucco construction. No public remarks explicitly reference masonry or stucco, so this feature is supported only by the MLS material field and may reflect inconsistent agent entry.
Steel frame construction appears in 17 of 20 current MLS entries, which is strong building-level evidence. The public remarks do not mention it explicitly, suggesting agents may be copying MLS construction data rather than describing the structure in the remarks. Still, the current MLS majority supports including it for buyers searching for steel frame buildings.
Concrete slab construction appears in 9 of 20 current MLS entries, so there is some support but not a clear majority. No public remarks mention a concrete slab or solid concrete foundation, so this looks like a lower-confidence MLS feature rather than a remark-confirmed fact. It should still be included for buyers searching for slab construction, but with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
A small minority (3 of 20) of MLS records indicate wood frame construction, but none of the public remarks mention 'wood frame'. The lack of corroborating remarks across many listings suggests this is unlikely to be a verified building-level feature.
Above-ground construction is not supported by the public remarks, and only 5 of 20 current MLS listings show ABOGRO in construction materials. The lack of any remark-level confirmation, combined with the low MLS frequency, suggests this is likely agent copy/paste noise or an unverified entry rather than a dependable building characteristic.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit short-term rental indicators such as STR allowed, vacation rental permitted, NUC/TVU, or legal transient rental language, and found none. There was also no language suggesting the building permits short-term rentals, so the safest interpretation from these remarks is that STR is not supported.
I looked for hotel rental pool terms such as Hilton/Trump/Ritz-style pool participation or hotel-managed operations and found nothing. Since there is no evidence of STR allowance, this also must remain false.
I searched for language indicating owners must participate in a rental pool or cannot opt out, but found no such references. With no STR/hotel-pool evidence in the remarks, mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for leasehold language such as leasehold, ground lease, lease expiry, lease ends, or renewed-through dates, but found nothing. There is no public evidence here to identify a lease expiration year.
The public remarks repeatedly advertise VA assumable financing and VA loan assumption options, which is strong evidence the building/unit inventory supports VA financing-related transactions. This is the clearest and most consistent feature across the listings.
I searched for HOA insurance descriptors like "fully insured," "full insurance," "walls-in coverage," or "comprehensive building insurance," but the remarks do not mention insurance coverage. No public listing text provides evidence that the building is fully insured by the HOA.
No analysis available
I looked for fire/life safety wording such as "FLSE passed," "fire life safety evaluation passed," "fire inspection passed," or similar compliance language, and found none. The remarks focus on renovations, amenities, and financing, not building safety certification.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 2 listings explicitly mention mountain views, with quotes such as “garden, mountain views!” and “mountain and two separate water views.” Historical data indicated High confidence for mountain views, and current remarks from multiple agents corroborate that some units/buildings offer mountain vistas rather than being a single copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings describe garden-style views or settings across the building, not just a single one-off remark. At least several listings explicitly mention "garden views," "private garden views," "landscaped grounds," "courtyard," or "park-like"/"lush tropical" surroundings, suggesting this is a real building-level feature for some units. The evidence appears consistent across many agents and is reinforced by the historical MLS pattern rather than copy-paste noise.
Numerous listings (at least 10–15) reference golf course frontage/views (phrases include “golf course frontage,” “overlooking the golf course,” “private gate to Hoakalei Golf Course,” and references to lanais facing the course). Evidence is consistent across many agent remarks, indicating the building offers golf course views for some units.
No analysis available
No listings in the provided public remarks mention sunrise, morning sun, or eastern exposure. Current MLS checkbox data indicates SUNRIS is unchecked across listings and there is no agent language indicating new sunrise views, so there is strong evidence the building does not offer sunrise-facing views.
Strong evidence that Town Homes at Fairways Edge offers sunset views in some units. At least several current remarks explicitly describe 'sunset views,' 'gorgeous sunsets,' and 'spectacular sunsets,' with some tying the view to golf course frontage and lanais. This appears consistent across multiple listings and agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit language about seeing Friday night fireworks from the units, lanais, or balconies. The remarks discuss sunset views, golf course views, and nearby attractions, but nothing indicates a fireworks view from the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No remarks in this set support an on-site/resident manager, despite a few MLS amenity checkboxes showing RESMAN. The evidence pattern is weak and appears inconsistent with the remarks, which repeatedly describe amenities like pool, BBQ, and security patrol but never a manager on property. Based on the public remarks, this feature is not substantiated for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.