Three Regents
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Three Regents
Building Overview
Three Regents in Aliamanu‑Salt Lake: concrete building (1974) with pool, window AC, assigned parking; pets allowed. Based on MLS data.
About Three Regents
Three Regents is located in the Aliamanu‑Salt Lake neighborhood and was built in 1974. According to available records, the building is of concrete construction.
Key features include an on‑site pool, window air conditioning units, and a pet‑friendly policy. Short‑term rentals are not allowed per the MLS data. The management company is listed as Unknown in available records.
Parking is available and assigned. Buyers should verify all details, including fees, management, and rules, as this summary is based on MLS data and may not reflect recent changes.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy percentages and descriptions such as majority owner occupied or highly owner occupied. None were found, so the owner-occupancy percentage is unknown.
The walk-up and low-rise descriptions strongly support that the building has no elevators. This is also consistent with the current value of 0 and the four-story building context.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 11 public remarks explicitly mentions common-area electricity, common electric, or building power. However, 10 of 11 current MLS records include OTCOEX, indicating the feature is likely consistently reported and should be included, though the lack of remark confirmation keeps confidence below the high-confidence level.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no current MLS support for hot water being included, and the dominant pattern is the opposite: 7 of 10 listings include WTRHTR. Multiple remarks mention a 'new water heater' or 'water heater,' which aligns with unit-owned water heating rather than hot water paid through maintenance fees. This is strong negative evidence that hot water is not included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks explicitly mention sewer inclusion. Nevertheless, all 11 of 11 current MLS listings list SEWER in the association fee inclusions, providing strong, consistent building-level evidence across the reviewed listings.
None of the public remarks explicitly states that water is included in the maintenance fee. Still, WATER is listed in 11 of 11 current MLS records, making the evidence uniform and strong across listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current listing remarks describe a recreation room or any equivalent shared entertainment space. The feature appears absent from the remarks set, while the MLS checkbox data is sparse and looks like a possible copy-paste or unverified entry rather than a confirmed amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Out of 9 recent listings, 1 explicitly mentions a 'separate-entrance storage unit for all your extra gear,' and that listing is also the only one with the STORAG checkbox in unit_features. This consistency between remarks and MLS data strongly indicates that at least some units in the building include dedicated storage space. Buyers seeking units with storage in this building would have viable options.
Listings were checked for terms like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', or 'bike and surfboard storage'. Only general storage was mentioned, with nothing to indicate dedicated surfboard storage facilities in the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Whirlpool/hot tub access is directly mentioned in 2 listings, including phrases like 'the building features a great pool, shallow pool and a whirlpool' and 'a pool, and a whirlpool.' The repeated mention across multiple listings supports that this is a real building amenity rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
The building's pool is strongly confirmed by both historical MLS data and current remarks. Seven listings explicitly mention the amenity across multiple descriptions, consistently characterizing it as a community or building pool, with one also noting a shallow pool and whirlpool.
No analysis available
Public remarks clearly confirm the presence of pools but never specify that any are saltwater. Searched for terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater pool', 'salt pool', and 'saline pool' and found no matches, so the pool type is assumed not to be saltwater based on available information.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the listings: at least 6 remarks explicitly mention an in-unit washer/dryer or a new washer/dryer, while current MLS inclusions show WASHER/DRYER in all 11 of 11 listings. The repeated detailed references across multiple listings, consistent with the previously high-confidence determination, confirm that the building offers units with in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
The listings do not reference any paid or coin-op laundry, such as 'coin laundry', 'card operated', or 'laundry fee'. Since only in-unit laundry is mentioned and no paid community laundry terms appear, this feature is presumed absent, though not definitively disproven.
The remarks discuss in-unit washers and dryers but never mention any shared or community laundry rooms, let alone on every floor. Phrases like 'laundry on each floor' or 'community laundry room on every floor' do not appear, so it's likely this feature does not exist, but this cannot be confirmed with high certainty.
All 11 current listings indicate some form of parking in the MLS data. Multiple listings explicitly mention "two assigned parking stalls" or "2 parking stalls," providing strong independent confirmation across several listings.
Several listings independently state that the unit includes "two assigned parking stalls," while 8/11 current MLS records contain ASSIGN. The repeated, specific wording across multiple listings strongly supports assigned building parking rather than a copied checkbox alone.
No analysis available
The remarks consistently describe assigned parking rather than deeded or owned parking. Because no explicit deeded-parking language was found, this is treated as false, though assignment does not definitively establish ownership status.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fees, monthly charges, rental costs, and additional parking expenses. The remarks mention assigned stalls but provide no parking fee information.
Four of 11 current listings identify guest parking in MLS data, but none of the supplied remarks mention "guest parking" or "visitor parking." This supports possible building availability, though confidence is limited because the evidence appears checkbox-based rather than independently described.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched all remarks for parking waitlist or waiting-list language. No such system was described.
No analysis available
None of the public remarks reference card or fob-based access systems, electronic entry, or similar controlled entry features. Searched for terms like key card, fob, card reader, and electronic access but found no evidence that such a system is present.
No analysis available
The listings do not describe any type of roving or patrolled security service for the building or complex. Searched for terms such as security patrol, roving security, and patrolled building, with no references found.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window A/C is strongly supported: 1 of 11 current public remarks explicitly mentions window A/C units in each room, while 9 of 11 listings include ACWIUN in the MLS inclusions. This confirms the historically high-confidence feature across multiple listings, although the detailed description appears in only one remark.
Concrete construction is strongly supported across the building data, with CONCRE reported in 10 of 11 current MLS listings. One public remark explicitly calls it a "concrete building," and the consistency across listings indicates this is a building-level feature rather than an isolated or copied remark.
No analysis available
There is no remark-based support for hollow tile construction in the provided listings. Only 1 of 10 MLS records carries HOLTIL, while the rest and the remarks point to a concrete building. This looks like a likely MLS miscoding rather than a verified building characteristic.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings describe the properties as suitable for owners or investors but do not explicitly address short-term rental permissions. With no supporting STR language, this is treated as false under the provided rules.
I searched for hotel rental-pool and hotel-operated rental-program references and found none. Because short-term rental permission is not established, this prerequisite feature is false.
I searched for language requiring participation in a hotel rental pool or prohibiting owners from opting out. No such language was found, and the prerequisite STR feature is not established.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language, lease expiration dates, ground leases, and renewal information. No specific four-digit lease expiry year was found, so the value remains unknown.
A listing directly confirms that the building is VA approved, satisfying the financing_va definition. No conflicting remarks were found.
The remarks directly describe the building as fully insured. This explicit statement supports a high-confidence true value.
No analysis available
I searched for references to fire/life safety evaluation, FLSE, fire safety certification, life safety compliance, and passed fire inspections. None were found, so there is no evidence that the building has passed an FLSE.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are clearly supported across multiple listings. At least 3 current remarks explicitly reference mountains, including phrases like "the mountains" and "faces the mountains," and the MLS data shows MOUNTA in view descriptions. This appears to be consistent across agents rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no meaningful evidence of garden, courtyard, or landscaped views in the current remarks. While some listings mention private yards, that is not the same as a garden view, and the historical summary already indicated no garden-view language across prior listings. The current GARDEN MLS flags therefore look unreliable.
Golf course views are very well established for this building. Multiple listings explicitly say the unit is on the perimeter of the golf course or overlooks the Honolulu Country Club course, and current MLS data shows GOLCOU in several view descriptions. The evidence is strong and consistent across separate listings/agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings mention sunset views, while 6 of 11 list no view. Remarks consistently describe golf course and mountain views instead, so there is no supporting evidence that the building offers sunset views.
No analysis available
Searched remarks for terms like 'fireworks view', 'watch fireworks from lanai', or similar and found no references. Without explicit mention, a fireworks view from the building is considered unlikely.
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of the 11 current listings explicitly mentions a manager on-site ('Site manager on property'), while RESMAN appears in 4/11 MLS amenity records. The evidence is consistent with the previously high-confidence determination, though most remarks do not independently discuss building management.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.