Three Regents
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Three Regents
Building Overview
Three Regents in Aliamanu‑Salt Lake: concrete building (1974) with pool, window AC, assigned parking; pets allowed. Based on MLS data.
About Three Regents
Three Regents is located in the Aliamanu‑Salt Lake neighborhood and was built in 1974. According to available records, the building is of concrete construction.
Key features include an on‑site pool, window air conditioning units, and a pet‑friendly policy. Short‑term rentals are not allowed per the MLS data. The management company is listed as Unknown in available records.
Parking is available and assigned. Buyers should verify all details, including fees, management, and rules, as this summary is based on MLS data and may not reflect recent changes.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy ratios, percentages, and descriptive phrases about owner-occupied versus renter-occupied units. None were mentioned in the public remarks, so this remains unknown.
The public remarks strongly support that this is a walk-up/low-rise building, which is consistent with no elevators. I also looked for explicit elevator counts such as '1 elevator,' 'multiple elevators,' or '4 elevators,' but found none.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Most recent MLS records for this building indicate common-area electricity is included, with 9 of 10 listings marked OTCOEX. The public remarks are silent on this item, so the evidence is MLS-driven rather than text-confirmed. Still, the consistency across nearly all current listings makes this a likely building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no current MLS support for hot water being included, and the dominant pattern is the opposite: 7 of 10 listings include WTRHTR. Multiple remarks mention a 'new water heater' or 'water heater,' which aligns with unit-owned water heating rather than hot water paid through maintenance fees. This is strong negative evidence that hot water is not included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Every recent MLS listing reviewed for this building includes sewer in the association fee inclusions. No public remarks contradict this, and there is no sign of agent disagreement or copy-paste inconsistency. This is a very strong, stable feature for the building.
All recent MLS listings for this building list water as included in the association fee. The public remarks do not provide contrary evidence, and the inclusion appears consistent across agents and listings. This is a highly reliable building-wide amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current listing remarks describe a recreation room or any equivalent shared entertainment space. The feature appears absent from the remarks set, while the MLS checkbox data is sparse and looks like a possible copy-paste or unverified entry rather than a confirmed amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Out of 9 recent listings, 1 explicitly mentions a 'separate-entrance storage unit for all your extra gear,' and that listing is also the only one with the STORAG checkbox in unit_features. This consistency between remarks and MLS data strongly indicates that at least some units in the building include dedicated storage space. Buyers seeking units with storage in this building would have viable options.
Listings were checked for terms like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', or 'bike and surfboard storage'. Only general storage was mentioned, with nothing to indicate dedicated surfboard storage facilities in the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Whirlpool/hot tub access is directly mentioned in 2 listings, including phrases like 'the building features a great pool, shallow pool and a whirlpool' and 'a pool, and a whirlpool.' The repeated mention across multiple listings supports that this is a real building amenity rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
Pool is strongly supported by both historical MLS data and current remarks. Multiple listings explicitly describe a shared amenity using phrases like "refreshing pool," "community pool," and "great pool, shallow pool," with one remark also noting a whirlpool. This appears to be a consistent building feature rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
Public remarks clearly confirm the presence of pools but never specify that any are saltwater. Searched for terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater pool', 'salt pool', and 'saline pool' and found no matches, so the pool type is assumed not to be saltwater based on available information.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported: multiple listings explicitly mention “in-unit full-size washer and dryer,” “new washer/dryer,” and “washer and dryer in unit.” This aligns with the historical MLS pattern of 10/10 current listings including washer/dryer in the inclusions, suggesting consistent building-level availability rather than a one-off agent error.
No analysis available
The listings do not reference any paid or coin-op laundry, such as 'coin laundry', 'card operated', or 'laundry fee'. Since only in-unit laundry is mentioned and no paid community laundry terms appear, this feature is presumed absent, though not definitively disproven.
The remarks discuss in-unit washers and dryers but never mention any shared or community laundry rooms, let alone on every floor. Phrases like 'laundry on each floor' or 'community laundry room on every floor' do not appear, so it's likely this feature does not exist, but this cannot be confirmed with high certainty.
Parking is clearly available in this building. All 10/10 current listings show a parking type in MLS, and several remarks independently confirm it with phrases like 'two assigned parking stalls' and '2 PARKING STALLS.'
Assigned parking is strongly supported. At least several listings independently describe 'two assigned parking stalls,' which matches the MLS assignment flags and does not look like a one-off copy/paste error.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit evidence of deeded, owned, or included parking stalls and found only references to assigned stalls. Assigned parking indicates allocation, but it does not confirm deeded ownership.
No analysis available
I searched for terms like parking fee, monthly parking charge, parking rental, or additional parking cost and found none. The remarks say the unit has assigned parking stalls, but they do not state any separate parking cost.
Guest parking appears to be available in some listings based on MLS data alone (3/10 listings with GUEST). There are no explicit remark mentions of visitor or guest parking, so this is lower confidence than the assigned-parking features.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for mentions of a parking waitlist, waiting list, or instructions to join a parking list and found nothing. The listings discuss assigned stalls, but do not indicate any waitlist system.
No analysis available
None of the public remarks reference card or fob-based access systems, electronic entry, or similar controlled entry features. Searched for terms like key card, fob, card reader, and electronic access but found no evidence that such a system is present.
No analysis available
The listings do not describe any type of roving or patrolled security service for the building or complex. Searched for terms such as security patrol, roving security, and patrolled building, with no references found.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window A/C is supported by both MLS data and remarks. One listing explicitly says "Window A/C units in each room keep the home comfortable year-round," and the current MLS checkbox is set in 8 of 10 listings. This looks like a consistent building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
Strong evidence supports concrete construction. One public remark directly says "this concrete building," and current MLS data has CONCRE in 9 of 10 listings. The consistency across multiple listings suggests this is not just a copy-paste checkbox issue.
No analysis available
There is no remark-based support for hollow tile construction in the provided listings. Only 1 of 10 MLS records carries HOLTIL, while the rest and the remarks point to a concrete building. This looks like a likely MLS miscoding rather than a verified building characteristic.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit short-term rental language such as STR permitted, vacation rental allowed, NUC, TVU, or 30-day minimum rules and found none. With no evidence that STRs are allowed, the safest reading from these public remarks is false.
I looked for references to a hotel rental pool or hotel-managed program such as Hilton, Trump, or Ritz pool participation and found nothing. Since the remarks do not establish that STR is allowed, this feature must remain false.
I searched for phrases indicating required participation, such as mandatory hotel pool, must rent, or cannot opt out, and found none. There is also no evidence that any hotel rental pool exists for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for leasehold language such as 'lease expires,' 'ground lease,' 'leasehold,' or a 4-digit expiration year and found nothing. There is no evidence to determine a lease expiry date from these listings.
The remarks explicitly state that the building is VA approved, which directly satisfies the feature definition. No conflicting language appears in the listings.
This is directly stated in the remarks, so the building appears to have full insurance coverage. The wording is explicit enough to support a high-confidence true value.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for any reference to fire/life safety evaluation passing, FLSE status, fire safety certification, or inspection compliance, and found nothing. With no public-remarks evidence, this remains unconfirmed and should not be assumed true.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are clearly supported across multiple listings. At least 3 current remarks explicitly reference mountains, including phrases like "the mountains" and "faces the mountains," and the MLS data shows MOUNTA in view descriptions. This appears to be consistent across agents rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no meaningful evidence of garden, courtyard, or landscaped views in the current remarks. While some listings mention private yards, that is not the same as a garden view, and the historical summary already indicated no garden-view language across prior listings. The current GARDEN MLS flags therefore look unreliable.
Golf course views are very well established for this building. Multiple listings explicitly say the unit is on the perimeter of the golf course or overlooks the Honolulu Country Club course, and current MLS data shows GOLCOU in several view descriptions. The evidence is strong and consistent across separate listings/agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched remarks for terms like 'fireworks view', 'watch fireworks from lanai', or similar and found no references. Without explicit mention, a fireworks view from the building is considered unlikely.
No analysis available
No analysis available
1 of the provided listings explicitly mentions a manager on site: 'Site manager on property.' The other remarks focus on unit features and amenities like pool, parking, and laundry, with no contradiction. This is strong direct evidence for an on-site manager, though it appears to come from a single agent remark rather than repeated copy-paste across multiple listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.