The Park on Keeaumoku
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
The Park on Keeaumoku
Building Overview
The Park on Keeaumoku in Downtown-Chinatown — 44-story concrete/steel tower with pool and concierge.
About The Park on Keeaumoku
The Park on Keeaumoku is a 44-floor residential building located in the Downtown-Chinatown neighborhood. Based on MLS data, the tower was built in 2025 and is constructed of concrete with a steel frame. Units in the building are noted to have views that may include ocean, mountain, Diamond Head, and sunset.
According to available records, on-site amenities include a pool, fitness center, BBQ area, resident manager, concierge, and security guard. Units use split air conditioning systems. The building does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted, per the MLS information.
Parking is listed as available, covered, and assigned, with guest parking also noted. The management company is unknown in the MLS data. Buyers should verify all details, rules, and any applicable fees or assessments with the listing agent or management prior to making a decision, as this summary is based solely on MLS-derived information.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy percentages and descriptive phrases, but the remarks only include a note that owner occupancy may be confirmed with management later. That is not an actual percentage, so the value remains unknown from the remarks.
I looked for explicit elevator counts such as "4 elevators," "multiple elevators," or similar wording, but found none. The remarks only reference proximity to an elevator, which does not confirm the number of elevators in the building.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV inclusion is strongly supported by both MLS data and remarks. 9 of 20 current listings show CABTV, and multiple remarks indicate Spectrum cable is included, which looks like repeated agent copy/paste confirmation rather than a one-off note.
Strong building-level evidence supports common area electricity being included. The current MLS pattern shows 15 of 20 listings with OTCOEX in association_fee_includes, which is a strong majority and consistent across many listings. Public remarks do not provide contrary evidence, so this appears to be a reliable building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I found no current listing remarks that explicitly say maintenance fees include hot water. Historical MLS data strongly points the other way: only 1 of 20 listings shows HOTWAT, while many list WTRHTR in inclusions, which is a strong sign the building does not provide hot water as a fee inclusion. The repeated wording across listings appears to be standard copy-paste amenity descriptions, not evidence of hot-water service being included.
Internet inclusion is well supported. 8 of 20 listings show INTSER, and the direct Spectrum cable-and-internet remark reinforces that this is a building-level fee item, likely carried forward across similar listings.
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is effectively confirmed at the building level. The current MLS data shows SEWER in 19 of 20 listings, which is extremely strong and consistent across listings. No remarks suggest otherwise, so this is a highly reliable feature.
Water is fully confirmed as included in the maintenance fee. All 20 of 20 listings show WATER in association_fee_includes, making this a unanimous and building-level feature. Public remarks do not contradict the MLS data, so confidence is maximal.
This amenity is heavily and repeatedly cited across the remarks. Multiple listings describe "BBQ pavilions," "BBQ cabanas," and "outdoor barbecue areas," showing strong building-level confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
This is a correction from a weak historical signal. Only 1 of 20 MLS records showed car wash, and the current public remarks across many listings do not mention any car wash, auto wash, or vehicle wash facility. Given the lack of supporting remarks, the feature is very likely not actually present.
Moderate evidence: although only a few MLS checkboxes show CLUHOU, many listings explicitly advertise 'clubrooms', 'club lounges', and 'party clubrooms' for private gatherings—implying clubhouse/community gathering spaces are available.
Concierge/front-desk service has moderate but not overwhelming support: 6 of 20 current MLS listings check CONCIE, and a few remarks reference 'secured reception,' which suggests a staffed front desk or lobby presence. The wording is not as explicit as the security language, so this looks like a probable amenity rather than a fully confirmed concierge program. Evidence is somewhat mixed and may reflect agent checkbox usage more than direct observation.
Several listings explicitly list 'dog run' or 'dog park' (phrases like 'dog run', 'dog park') across the remarks. Given repeated mentions in the public remarks despite lower historical checkbox counts, there's good confidence the building provides a dog run/pet exercise area.
Implied building doorman/lobby-attendant service: although only 1/20 listings had DOORMA checked historically, roughly several current listings (multiple agents) mention 'secured reception', 'secured entry', or 'resident manager' and some say 'secured reception, resident manager' or 'secured reception' alongside 24-hour security. This suggests a staffed reception/lobby presence for many units, but the wording is often implied ('secured reception') rather than explicitly 'doorman', so confidence is moderate.
Strongly confirmed across many listings. Remarks repeatedly reference a "fitness center," "gym," "exercise gym," and similar wording, so this is clearly a shared building amenity rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
Meeting/conference-style space is well supported. One listing explicitly says "meeting room," while many others describe co-working lounges and club rooms that function as shared meeting space.
Strong building-level evidence supports patio/deck amenities. Dozens of current remarks mention "private lanai," "wraparound lanai," "large lanai," "private balcony," and "amenity deck," and the references appear across multiple listings and agents rather than a single copy-paste source. This aligns with the current MLS data showing 17/20 listings coded with PATDEC/COVPAT.
Remarks include 'walking paths' as a specific amenity in the development and describe a 'private central park' and 'beautifully landscaped park' within the project, implying internal paths for walking/jogging. Despite only 4/20 MLS entries checking WAJOPA, the explicit 'walking paths' language provides strong evidence of on-site walking/jogging paths.
No analysis available
There is moderate evidence for private or resident-accessible yard-like outdoor space, but the remarks more often describe shared landscaped areas than true private fenced yards. Multiple listings reference "private central park," "green space," "residents' lawn," and "landscaped gardens," which supports a building amenity rather than a unit-exclusive yard. This appears to be a real shared outdoor feature, though less explicit than the patio/deck evidence.
No analysis available
There is clear shared recreation-area evidence across the listings. Remarks mention an "amenity deck," "rec deck," "recreation decks," and landscaped gathering spaces, indicating a common outdoor amenity area.
The building’s recreation-room-type amenity is well supported by the remarks, though the wording varies. Listings repeatedly reference "club rooms," "party rooms," and "party clubrooms," which is consistent with a shared recreation room function.
This feature is supported by several remarks, though less uniformly than the major amenities. Multiple listings cite on-site dining, "restaurants and cafes," and the "MidTown Eats Food Court," making building-level restaurant/dining access credible.
No analysis available
Sauna is consistently referenced across the listings and is strongly supported by the MLS data. Many remarks explicitly say 'sauna,' 'sauna room,' or mention spa areas as part of the amenity set. This appears to be a genuine shared building amenity rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I searched all remarks for terms like surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, and bike and surfboard storage and found no mentions. Given how detailed and repetitive the amenity descriptions are across many listings, this absence suggests the building does not offer dedicated surfboard storage.
No analysis available
Trash chute is strongly supported at the MLS level, with 20/20 listings showing the amenity. The public remarks are silent on it, but there is no indication the feature has changed or been removed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Whirlpool/spa amenities are strongly confirmed. The remarks repeatedly use direct terms like "whirlpool spa," "hot tub," and "jacuzzi," leaving little doubt this amenity is present.
The building clearly has a shared pool amenity. The current remarks mention it dozens of times across multiple listings and agents, most commonly as an 'infinity pool' or 'infinity-edge pool,' often paired with a spa and cabanas. This is consistent with the historical MLS data showing 20/20 listings with pool-related amenities, so confidence is extremely high.
Implied evidence for heating: 1/20 current MLS listings include the heated-pool checkbox and numerous remarks mention 'whirlpool spa', 'hot tub' or 'spa' though none explicitly say 'heated pool'. This suggests the pool/spa complex likely includes heated components (spa/hot tub) and possibly a heated pool, but explicit 'heated pool' language is not present.
I searched all public remarks for any indication the pool is salt water, including terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater', 'salt pool', and 'saline'. None were found, despite many detailed amenity descriptions, so it is likely the pool is not salt water.
In-unit laundry is strongly confirmed across the building. Multiple current listings explicitly mention "in-unit washer and dryer," "washer/dryer in unit," or "separate laundry room," and this appears across numerous agents and unit types rather than copy-paste noise. The evidence aligns with the existing high-confidence MLS data, so this feature should be retained.
No analysis available
Because the building descriptions focus exclusively on in-unit laundry and never reference a shared or paid laundry room, there is no evidence that a paid community laundry exists. Searches for coin/card-operated or fee-based laundry terms in the remarks returned no results, so this feature is treated as not present.
The listings consistently emphasize in-unit laundry rooms and washers/dryers, which is typical of new luxury towers. There are no mentions of any community or per-floor laundry rooms, so it is likely that there is no community laundry on every floor. This conclusion is based solely on the absence of such mentions in extensive public remarks.
No analysis available
Assigned parking is strongly confirmed across the building. Multiple current listings explicitly mention 'assigned parking stalls,' 'assigned parking,' or a 'well-located assigned parking stall,' suggesting this is not a copy-paste artifact but a consistent building feature. The evidence is reinforced by the prior high-confidence MLS pattern (16/20 listings with ASSIGN).
Covered parking is strongly supported building-wide. Multiple independent listings explicitly mention "secured covered parking," "covered parking stall," and "two covered parking stalls," indicating this is not just checkbox noise. The evidence is consistent across many remarks and aligns with the existing high-confidence MLS data.
I looked for public-remark wording like deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included with the unit. The listings consistently describe assigned, secured, or covered stalls instead, which supports parking existing but not deeded ownership.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit parking cost language such as monthly parking fee, parking rental, or extra parking charge. The remarks mention stalls and parking availability, but no fee amount or charge was stated.
Guest parking is well supported for the building. Several independent listings explicitly reference "guest parking," "Ample guest parking is available," and "many guest pkg," suggesting broad availability rather than a unit-specific perk. The repeated mentions across different remarks reinforce the current MLS indicator.
Secured parking/entry is strongly supported at the building level. Across many listings, agents describe secure access with phrases like "secured reception," "secure entry," "24/7 security," and even a "gated level," which suggests the parking area is accessed through controlled entry rather than open parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for 'parking waitlist,' 'parking waiting list,' or similar wording, but found nothing. The listings describe assigned or secured stalls, not a waitlist system.
No analysis available
Searched all remarks for phrases such as 'key card', 'keycard', 'fob', 'card access', and 'electronic access' and found no references. Given the extensive marketing of other security features without mentioning card/fob access, it is likely this is not a distinct, advertised feature.
Security guard service is strongly supported across the building. Dozens of current remarks explicitly reference "24-hour security," "24/7 security," "secured access," and "secured reception," which aligns with the high-confidence historical MLS data (18/20 listings checked SECGUA). The evidence appears consistent across multiple listings and agents, not just a one-off mention.
Remarks repeatedly highlight round-the-clock security and a secured building/entry, suggesting an organized security service operating at all hours. Combined with prior high-confidence assessment, this supports that the building has an active security patrol service.
No analysis available
Across the compiled remarks, there are no references to 'central AC', 'central air', or building-wide HVAC; cooling is always described via in-unit split systems. With 19/20 MLS records not checking central AC and remarks repeatedly emphasizing split AC as the primary cooling, we infer the building does not offer central air and the lone checkbox is a mistake.
Strong, repeated evidence across many current listings confirms split AC throughout the building. Multiple agents across both towers and many floor plans explicitly describe it, often with details like 'split AC in every room' and 'split LG A/C system,' which makes this far more than a copy-paste checkbox issue.
No analysis available
Concrete construction is very strongly supported by the MLS history, with CONCRE appearing in 20 of 20 listings. The public remarks across the listings describe a new high-rise condominium building and never suggest any alternate structural material, so this appears to be reliable building-level information rather than copy-paste noise.
Double wall construction is only weakly supported in the structured data, with just 6 of 20 listings flagged, and the public remarks do not mention it at all. Because there is no remark-based confirmation and the MLS evidence is sparse, this is best treated as not supported for this building.
No analysis available
Masonry/stucco has very weak current support. Only 3 of 20 listings show MASSTU, and none of the public remarks explicitly describe masonry or stucco construction. Because the prior confidence was high, this is not strong enough to safely reverse, but the evidence is materially weaker than for concrete.
Steel frame construction has moderate support from the MLS records, with 13 of 20 listings marked STEFRA. The public remarks do not explicitly confirm steel framing, but they consistently describe the same building and do not provide evidence against it.
Weak MLS evidence: only 2 of 20 listings list SLAB in construction_materials and none of the public remarks mention a concrete slab foundation. Because a small minority of MLS records include it, the building is reported to offer slab construction with low–moderate confidence.
No analysis available
Wood frame (WOOFRA) appears in just 1 of 20 current MLS entries, versus 19 of 20 that mark concrete, in a building repeatedly marketed as a brand-new high-rise tower with floors into the 40s. No public remarks mention wood-frame construction, which would be atypical for this type of structure, so the isolated WOOFRA checkbox is likely a mistaken or copy-paste entry rather than a real building feature. On this basis, wood-frame construction is treated as not present at the building level.
Above ground construction has almost no support in the MLS data, with only 2 of 20 listings flagged, and the remarks never reference it. Given the lack of explicit confirmation and the very low checkbox frequency, this looks unverified and likely incorrect for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings say rentals require at least a 90-day lease, which is strong evidence that short-term rentals are not permitted. This is the clearest signal in the public remarks for STR policy.
I searched for hotel rental pool, hotel-managed operation, branded rental program, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool language, and found none. Because the remarks indicate rentals must be 90 days or longer, hotel pool participation is not supported.
I looked for wording like mandatory hotel pool, required participation, or cannot opt out, but found nothing. The remarks frame the building as owner-occupant/investor friendly with long-term rental rules, not a mandatory rental-pool property.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for leasehold language such as 'lease expires,' 'ground lease ends,' 'renewed through,' or any 4-digit expiration year, but found nothing. Since no leasehold timing is stated in the public remarks, the expiry year remains unknown.
The public remarks directly say the building is VA approved, which supports VA financing eligibility. I did not find any contradictory financing language in the remarks.
I looked for HOA insurance and walls-in coverage wording, but the remarks do not mention full insurance coverage. Without any explicit language confirming it, this feature is not supported by the public remarks.
Fire sprinklers appear to be a building-level feature supported by the current MLS data, with 15 of 20 recent listings including FIRSPR in amenities. The remarks do not explicitly mention sprinklers or fire suppression, but the MLS pattern is strong and consistent enough to treat this as present.
I searched the remarks for fire/life safety evaluation language and found no explicit confirmation. Because there is no current positive evidence in the listings, this is treated as not verified from the remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are strongly supported at the building level. Multiple remarks across many listings mention "ocean views," "partial ocean," "Pacific Ocean," and "sweeping ocean views," indicating this is not a one-off unit feature. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents and is reinforced by the high-frequency MLS view data.
Mountain views are strongly supported across many listings for this building. Multiple remarks explicitly mention "mountain views," "Koolau Mountain," and "sweeping" or "panoramic" mountain vistas, indicating this is a building-level feature rather than a one-off unit trait.
Diamond Head views are clearly supported by the current remarks and historical MLS pattern. Numerous listings mention "Diamond Head," often alongside city, ocean, or mountain views, showing broad and repeated agent confirmation rather than isolated copy-paste.
City views appear to be a universal feature for this building. The remarks repeatedly use variants like "city skyline," "city lights," and "urban views," making this one of the most consistently supported features in the dataset.
Solid evidence: several listings refer to 'Ewa coastline', 'coastline', or similar shoreline panoramas (explicit mentions appear across separate unit remarks). While less ubiquitous than generic 'ocean' phrasing, these specific coastline references appear in multiple listings and support inclusion.
Several listings (multiple units/remarks) reference landscaped gardens, a central park/the Grove, and residents' lawn or landscaped decks; while not always worded as an explicit 'garden view' checkbox, these repeated mentions across different listings imply garden/courtyard/park views are available from some units.
No analysis available
Marina/canal-type views are supported, though less consistently than mountain, city, or Diamond Head. The strongest explicit wording is "Ala Wai Canal," which fits the marina/canal definition, but this feature appears only in a minority of listings.
Sunrise views are clearly present for some units, especially east-facing listings. Several remarks explicitly reference "sunrise views," "golden sunrises," and east-facing exposure, indicating this is a real but not universal building-level view feature.
Sunset views are supported by multiple listings, though not as universally as city views. Current MLS data shows 8 of 20 listings with SUNSET in the view descriptions, and remarks include phrases like "enjoy the wonderful sunsets" and "evening sunsets." The feature is credible and appears to be a real building-level offering for some units.
No analysis available
Searched extensively for references to viewing fireworks from the building or lanais and found none. Given that views of ocean, Diamond Head, sunsets, and city lights are heavily marketed but fireworks are never mentioned, this feature is likely not present or not notable.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is supported by both the MLS and remark evidence. The current MLS data shows RESMAN in 14 of 20 recent listings, and at least one remark explicitly notes a "resident manager," indicating the feature is likely building-wide rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.