
The Park on Keeaumoku
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
The Park on Keeaumoku
Building Overview
The Park on Keeaumoku in Downtown-Chinatown — 44-story concrete/steel tower with pool and concierge.

About The Park on Keeaumoku
The Park on Keeaumoku is a 44-floor residential building located in the Downtown-Chinatown neighborhood. Based on MLS data, the tower was built in 2025 and is constructed of concrete with a steel frame. Units in the building are noted to have views that may include ocean, mountain, Diamond Head, and sunset.
According to available records, on-site amenities include a pool, fitness center, BBQ area, resident manager, concierge, and security guard. Units use split air conditioning systems. The building does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted, per the MLS information.
Parking is listed as available, covered, and assigned, with guest parking also noted. The management company is unknown in the MLS data. Buyers should verify all details, rules, and any applicable fees or assessments with the listing agent or management prior to making a decision, as this summary is based solely on MLS-derived information.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy percentages and descriptive terms such as majority owner occupied or highly owner occupied, but the remarks do not provide any such information. One remark even says owner occupancy may change when confirmed with management, which still does not give a usable percentage.
I searched the remarks for explicit elevator counts or phrases like "multiple elevators" and found nothing. Given the very tall building context, elevators are likely present, but the remarks do not confirm how many.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV inclusion is strongly supported by both MLS data and remarks. 9 of 20 current listings show CABTV, and multiple remarks indicate Spectrum cable is included, which looks like repeated agent copy/paste confirmation rather than a one-off note.
Strong building-level evidence supports common area electricity being included. The current MLS pattern shows 15 of 20 listings with OTCOEX in association_fee_includes, which is a strong majority and consistent across many listings. Public remarks do not provide contrary evidence, so this appears to be a reliable building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is not supported as a maintenance-fee inclusion for this building. Only 1 of 20 listings shows HOTWAT, while 16 of 20 show WTRHTR, which is a strong indicator that units have their own water heaters instead of building-provided hot water. The public remarks do not describe hot water as included, so the false correction is well supported.
Internet inclusion is well supported. 8 of 20 listings show INTSER, and the direct Spectrum cable-and-internet remark reinforces that this is a building-level fee item, likely carried forward across similar listings.
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is effectively confirmed at the building level. The current MLS data shows SEWER in 19 of 20 listings, which is extremely strong and consistent across listings. No remarks suggest otherwise, so this is a highly reliable feature.
Water is fully confirmed as included in the maintenance fee. All 20 of 20 listings show WATER in association_fee_includes, making this a unanimous and building-level feature. Public remarks do not contradict the MLS data, so confidence is maximal.
BBQ/grilling facilities are clearly present and heavily repeated in the remarks. Nearly every listing references some form of BBQ amenity, with phrases like 'BBQ pavilions,' 'BBQ cabanas,' and 'multiple BBQ stations,' matching the 20/20 MLS pattern. This is strong, building-wide evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
This is a correction from a weak historical signal. Only 1 of 20 MLS records showed car wash, and the current public remarks across many listings do not mention any car wash, auto wash, or vehicle wash facility. Given the lack of supporting remarks, the feature is very likely not actually present.
Moderate evidence: although only a few MLS checkboxes show CLUHOU, many listings explicitly advertise 'clubrooms', 'club lounges', and 'party clubrooms' for private gatherings—implying clubhouse/community gathering spaces are available.
Concierge/front-desk service has moderate but not overwhelming support: 6 of 20 current MLS listings check CONCIE, and a few remarks reference 'secured reception,' which suggests a staffed front desk or lobby presence. The wording is not as explicit as the security language, so this looks like a probable amenity rather than a fully confirmed concierge program. Evidence is somewhat mixed and may reflect agent checkbox usage more than direct observation.
Several listings explicitly list 'dog run' or 'dog park' (phrases like 'dog run', 'dog park') across the remarks. Given repeated mentions in the public remarks despite lower historical checkbox counts, there's good confidence the building provides a dog run/pet exercise area.
Implied building doorman/lobby-attendant service: although only 1/20 listings had DOORMA checked historically, roughly several current listings (multiple agents) mention 'secured reception', 'secured entry', or 'resident manager' and some say 'secured reception, resident manager' or 'secured reception' alongside 24-hour security. This suggests a staffed reception/lobby presence for many units, but the wording is often implied ('secured reception') rather than explicitly 'doorman', so confidence is moderate.
Exercise/fitness space is strongly confirmed at the building level. Multiple remarks across many listings describe a 'fitness center,' 'gym,' or 'indoor fitness center,' matching the MLS amenity data (20/20). The wording is consistent across agents and appears to be standard building copy, not isolated claims.
No analysis available
Meeting/conference-style space is well supported. One remark explicitly says 'meeting room,' and many others describe co-working lounges, co-working spaces, club rooms, and party rooms that function as shared gathering/meeting areas. The MLS pattern is also very strong at 19/20.
Strong, repeated evidence supports patio/deck amenities across the building. Dozens of current remarks mention "private lanai," "wrap-around lanai," "private balcony," "amenity deck," "BBQ pavilions," and "sun deck," indicating both unit-level outdoor spaces and shared outdoor amenity areas. The consistency across many listings suggests this is not copy-paste noise but a real, building-wide feature.
Remarks include 'walking paths' as a specific amenity in the development and describe a 'private central park' and 'beautifully landscaped park' within the project, implying internal paths for walking/jogging. Despite only 4/20 MLS entries checking WAJOPA, the explicit 'walking paths' language provides strong evidence of on-site walking/jogging paths.
No analysis available
There is moderate evidence for private or resident-accessible yard-like outdoor space, but the remarks more often describe shared landscaped areas than true private fenced yards. Multiple listings reference "private central park," "green space," "residents' lawn," and "landscaped gardens," which supports a building amenity rather than a unit-exclusive yard. This appears to be a real shared outdoor feature, though less explicit than the patio/deck evidence.
No analysis available
The building clearly offers a shared recreation/amenity area. Multiple remarks call out an 'amenity deck,' 'expansive rec deck,' 'recreation decks,' and landscaped green space, matching the MLS data. This is repeated enough across listings to be considered a reliable building feature.
A recreation-room-type amenity is supported by both MLS history and remarks. Listings commonly describe 'club rooms,' 'party clubrooms,' 'party rooms,' and at least one explicitly says 'recreation rooms,' which aligns with the building-level amenity. Evidence is broad across multiple agents and likely reflects the same shared interior amenity space.
Clear evidence in multiple remarks of on-site dining: 'MidTown Eats' food court with 13 vendors/full bar, on-site retail/restaurants and planned commercial spaces—supports inclusion of an on-site restaurant/food-court offering.
No analysis available
Sauna is consistently referenced across the listings and is strongly supported by the MLS data. Many remarks explicitly say 'sauna,' 'sauna room,' or mention spa areas as part of the amenity set. This appears to be a genuine shared building amenity rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I searched all remarks for terms like surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, and bike and surfboard storage and found no mentions. Given how detailed and repetitive the amenity descriptions are across many listings, this absence suggests the building does not offer dedicated surfboard storage.
No analysis available
Trash chute is strongly supported by the MLS records, with 20/20 listings showing the amenity. The public remarks do not discuss it, but there is no evidence of a correction or change, so the MLS consensus is persuasive. This should be treated as a building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Whirlpool/spa amenities are strongly confirmed. The remarks repeatedly reference 'whirlpool spa,' 'whirlpool,' 'hot tub,' and 'jacuzzi,' making this one of the clearest amenities in the building. The MLS data also strongly supports it at 18/20.
The building clearly has a shared pool amenity. Across the remarks, dozens of listings mention it directly, most often as an "infinity pool" or "infinity-edge pool," and many also pair it with spa/hot tub/cabanas. The evidence is highly consistent across multiple listings and appears to be a real building feature, not a copy-paste mistake.
Implied evidence for heating: 1/20 current MLS listings include the heated-pool checkbox and numerous remarks mention 'whirlpool spa', 'hot tub' or 'spa' though none explicitly say 'heated pool'. This suggests the pool/spa complex likely includes heated components (spa/hot tub) and possibly a heated pool, but explicit 'heated pool' language is not present.
I searched all public remarks for any indication the pool is salt water, including terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater', 'salt pool', and 'saline'. None were found, despite many detailed amenity descriptions, so it is likely the pool is not salt water.
In-unit laundry is strongly confirmed across the building. Multiple current listings explicitly state "washer/dryer in unit" or "in-unit washer and dryer," and several others mention a separate laundry room, indicating this is a real and commonly advertised feature rather than a copy-paste checkbox issue. The evidence is consistent across many listings and agents, reinforcing the existing high-confidence MLS data.
No analysis available
Because the building descriptions focus exclusively on in-unit laundry and never reference a shared or paid laundry room, there is no evidence that a paid community laundry exists. Searches for coin/card-operated or fee-based laundry terms in the remarks returned no results, so this feature is treated as not present.
The listings consistently emphasize in-unit laundry rooms and washers/dryers, which is typical of new luxury towers. There are no mentions of any community or per-floor laundry rooms, so it is likely that there is no community laundry on every floor. This conclusion is based solely on the absence of such mentions in extensive public remarks.
No analysis available
Assigned parking is strongly confirmed across the building. Multiple current listings explicitly mention 'assigned parking stalls,' 'assigned parking,' or a 'well-located assigned parking stall,' suggesting this is not a copy-paste artifact but a consistent building feature. The evidence is reinforced by the prior high-confidence MLS pattern (16/20 listings with ASSIGN).
Covered parking is very strongly supported building-wide. Numerous remarks independently reference 'covered parking,' 'secured covered parking,' and '2 covered side by side parking stalls,' which aligns with the prior MLS pattern showing covered parking in all listings. This appears to be consistent across agents and unit types rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
I looked for explicit wording like deeded parking, owned stall, parking included in deed, or deeded stall, but the remarks only mention assigned, covered, side-by-side, and secured parking. Those phrases indicate parking is available, but not that it is deeded with the unit.
No analysis available
I looked for a separate parking charge, monthly parking rental, or additional parking cost, but the remarks do not provide one. They mention parking being assigned or secured, which suggests parking is included rather than billed separately, but no fee is stated.
Guest parking is well supported for the building. Several independent listings mention 'guest parking,' 'many guest pkg,' or 'ample guest parking is available,' confirming the feature across multiple remarks. The evidence is consistent with the prior MLS history and does not appear isolated to a single listing.
Secured parking/entry is strongly supported at the building level. Across many listings, agents describe secure access with phrases like "secured reception," "secure entry," "24/7 security," and even a "gated level," which suggests the parking area is accessed through controlled entry rather than open parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for parking waitlist, waiting list, or join-waitlist language and found nothing. The listings instead describe assigned or secured parking stalls, which suggests there is no waitlist system mentioned in these remarks.
No analysis available
Searched all remarks for phrases such as 'key card', 'keycard', 'fob', 'card access', and 'electronic access' and found no references. Given the extensive marketing of other security features without mentioning card/fob access, it is likely this is not a distinct, advertised feature.
Security guard service is strongly supported across the building. Multiple current remarks explicitly mention "24/7 security," "24-hour security," "secured with 24-hour service," and "secure entry," across many listings and different agents, indicating this is not a copy-paste anomaly. The MLS checkbox is also present in 17/20 current listings, so the feature should be retained with very high confidence.
Remarks repeatedly highlight round-the-clock security and a secured building/entry, suggesting an organized security service operating at all hours. Combined with prior high-confidence assessment, this supports that the building has an active security patrol service.
No analysis available
Across the compiled remarks, there are no references to 'central AC', 'central air', or building-wide HVAC; cooling is always described via in-unit split systems. With 19/20 MLS records not checking central AC and remarks repeatedly emphasizing split AC as the primary cooling, we infer the building does not offer central air and the lone checkbox is a mistake.
Strong, repeated evidence across many current listings confirms split AC throughout the building. Multiple remarks from different units and towers explicitly say 'split AC in every room,' 'split-system air conditioning,' and 'split LG A/C system,' indicating this is a building-wide feature rather than a one-off upgrade. The evidence is consistent and appears across numerous agents, not just copy-paste checkbox data.
No analysis available
Concrete construction is strongly supported. The MLS dataset shows CONCRE in 19 of 20 listings, which is extremely consistent across the building. Public remarks do not contradict this and repeatedly describe the property as a new high-rise condominium, so concrete construction is highly reliable.
Double wall construction is only weakly supported by the current MLS checkbox data, with 8 of 20 listings flagged. The public remarks do not explicitly reference double wall, double-wall construction, or two walls, so this looks more like inconsistent MLS entry than verified building information. Because the earlier confidence was high, I have kept it as unconfirmed rather than reversing it.
No analysis available
Masonry/stucco has very weak current support. Only 3 of 20 listings show MASSTU, and none of the public remarks explicitly describe masonry or stucco construction. Because the prior confidence was high, this is not strong enough to safely reverse, but the evidence is materially weaker than for concrete.
Steel frame construction has moderate support from the MLS records, with 15 of 20 listings checked as STEFRA. The public remarks across the listings do not explicitly mention steel framing, so this appears to be MLS-driven rather than remark-confirmed evidence. Still, the frequency is high enough to treat it as likely building-level construction.
Weak MLS evidence: only 2 of 20 listings list SLAB in construction_materials and none of the public remarks mention a concrete slab foundation. Because a small minority of MLS records include it, the building is reported to offer slab construction with low–moderate confidence.
No analysis available
Wood frame (WOOFRA) appears in just 1 of 20 current MLS entries, versus 19 of 20 that mark concrete, in a building repeatedly marketed as a brand-new high-rise tower with floors into the 40s. No public remarks mention wood-frame construction, which would be atypical for this type of structure, so the isolated WOOFRA checkbox is likely a mistaken or copy-paste entry rather than a real building feature. On this basis, wood-frame construction is treated as not present at the building level.
Limited structured-data support: only 2 of 20 MLS listings currently check 'ABOGRO' and none of the public remarks mention 'above ground' construction. Because historical data previously indicated stronger support and there is no clear, consistent evidence in remarks to overturn that, this is retained as a building-level feature with moderate confidence; the current distribution suggests some agent checkbox inconsistency or copy/paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The clearest evidence is the 90-day minimum lease requirement, which means short-term rentals are not allowed. Multiple remarks reinforce that the building supports only mid-term and long-term rentals.
I searched for hotel rental pool, branded rental program, or hotel-managed operation language and found none. Because short-term rentals are not allowed, a hotel pool cannot apply here.
I looked for wording indicating a mandatory rental pool or required participation, but found nothing. The remarks frame the building as usable for owner-occupants and investors, which is inconsistent with a mandatory hotel pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for leasehold language such as "lease expires," "ground lease ends," or an extension year, but found nothing. Since there is no specific expiry year mentioned in the public remarks, this remains unknown.
The public remarks directly state that the building is VA approved, which supports VA financing acceptance. I looked for any contradictory financing language, but found none.
I searched for HOA insurance or walls-in coverage language like fully insured, full insurance, comprehensively covered, or walls-in coverage and found nothing. The remarks mention HOA fees and building amenities, but not the insurance status.
Fire sprinklers appear to be a building-level feature. The current MLS data supports this strongly, with 18 of 20 recent listings including the FIRSPR amenity. Public remarks do not explicitly call out sprinklers, but the high rate of MLS confirmation across listings suggests this is not just a copy-paste anomaly.
I looked for fire/life safety evaluation language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection, but found no such references. There is no public remark evidence to confirm this feature.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are strongly supported at the building level. Multiple remarks across many listings mention "ocean views," "partial ocean," "Pacific Ocean," and "sweeping ocean views," indicating this is not a one-off unit feature. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents and is reinforced by the high-frequency MLS view data.
Mountain views appear to be a common building-level feature. The remarks repeatedly reference "mountain views," "Koolau Mountain," and "sweeping mountain" views from multiple units and towers. This aligns with the strong MLS pattern and suggests the feature is broadly available rather than isolated.
Diamond Head views are clearly supported by both MLS history and current remarks. Many listings explicitly mention "Diamond Head views" or similar wording, and several note it alongside ocean/city views, indicating a recurring building-level view corridor. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and listing types.
City views appear to be near-universal for the building. Remarks across many listings explicitly mention "city views," "city skyline," and "city lights," which matches the very high MLS frequency. This is strong evidence that city-view units are widely available in the building.
Solid evidence: several listings refer to 'Ewa coastline', 'coastline', or similar shoreline panoramas (explicit mentions appear across separate unit remarks). While less ubiquitous than generic 'ocean' phrasing, these specific coastline references appear in multiple listings and support inclusion.
Several listings (multiple units/remarks) reference landscaped gardens, a central park/the Grove, and residents' lawn or landscaped decks; while not always worded as an explicit 'garden view' checkbox, these repeated mentions across different listings imply garden/courtyard/park views are available from some units.
No analysis available
Marina/harbor/canal views are mentioned in a small subset of listings (MLS ~3/20). Example language: 'views of ... Ala Wai Canal' — this indicates some units overlook the Ala Wai/harbor/canal area, but the evidence is limited to relatively few listings and appears to be unit-specific rather than universal across the building.
Sunrise views are supported for some units, especially east-facing/high-floor listings. Several remarks explicitly mention "sunrise views," "as the sun rises," and "golden sunrises," while others refer to east-facing exposure and morning light. This is strong enough to include as an available building feature, though not universal.
Sunset views are supported by multiple listings, though not as universally as city views. Current MLS data shows 8 of 20 listings with SUNSET in the view descriptions, and remarks include phrases like "enjoy the wonderful sunsets" and "evening sunsets." The feature is credible and appears to be a real building-level offering for some units.
No analysis available
Searched extensively for references to viewing fireworks from the building or lanais and found none. Given that views of ocean, Diamond Head, sunsets, and city lights are heavily marketed but fireworks are never mentioned, this feature is likely not present or not notable.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is supported by both MLS and remark evidence. The current MLS data shows RESMAN in 14 of 20 recent listings, and at least one public remark explicitly states 'a resident manager,' indicating this is not just a copy-paste checkbox artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.