
The Collection
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
The Collection
Building Overview
The Collection in Downtown-Chinatown (built 2016) — concrete construction with pool and fitness center, ocean and mountain views.

About The Collection
The Collection is a concrete high-rise located in the Downtown-Chinatown neighborhood, built in 2016. According to available records, the building offers views that include ocean, mountain, Diamond Head and sunsets.
Key on-site amenities recorded in the MLS include a pool, fitness center, BBQ area, a resident manager and a security guard. Units use split-system air conditioning. Short-term rentals are not permitted and pets are not allowed per the provided data.
Parking is available with covered, assigned spaces and guest parking. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS information. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all building features, rules, and any applicable fees with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for exact percentages and phrases like "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," and "highly owner occupied." The remarks do not mention owner-occupancy levels, so this remains unknown from the provided listing text.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator-count language such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," and "multiple elevators," but found no building-wide count. The remarks only reference convenience around elevators or being near an elevator, which does not establish how many elevators the building has.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
Historical MLS data indicated the association fee included central AC (ACCEN present in 1/20 current listings and prior high-confidence summaries). None of the public remarks explicitly say ‘maintenance fee includes central air conditioning’ (many instead list cable, internet, water, sewer). A handful of unit remarks mention central or split AC as an in-unit feature, suggesting AC is present in the building, but there is no clear, repeated agent language confirming the fee covers central AC—evidence is therefore implied and not strongly corroborated across multiple listings.
Cable inclusion is strongly supported for The Collection. Several remarks explicitly state the HOA or maintenance fee includes cable, such as 'Maintenance fee included Cable tv' and 'includes cable, internet Wi-Fi, water, sewer & common area upkeep.' The evidence is repeated across multiple listings and appears consistent rather than a one-off agent copy-paste error.
Common-area expense coverage is well supported for this building. At least one current remark says the maintenance fee includes 'common area upkeep,' and another lists 'common area expenses,' matching the MLS pattern. The repeated references across listings make this a strong building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water does not appear to be included in the maintenance fee. There are no current remarks explicitly saying hot water is included, while the MLS pattern shows WTRHTR in most listings, which is a strong indicator against building-supplied hot water. This is consistent with the current data and should remain false.
Internet inclusion is very strongly supported for The Collection. Multiple listings state the fee includes 'internet,' 'internet Wi-Fi,' or 'high speed internet,' including direct mentions in the maintenance-fee remarks. This is consistent across many listings and appears reliable.
No analysis available
Sewer is one of the most consistently confirmed fee items for this building. Several remarks explicitly list sewer among the covered maintenance items, including 'includes cable, internet Wi-Fi, water, sewer & common area upkeep.' The volume and consistency of references make this a near-certain feature.
Water inclusion is very strongly supported for The Collection. Numerous remarks explicitly mention water being included in the HOA or maintenance fee, often alongside cable, internet, and sewer. The evidence is broad across listings and consistent with the MLS data.
BBQ/grilling facilities are repeatedly confirmed across the remarks. Dozens of listings mention 'BBQ cabanas,' 'BBQ areas,' 'grill stations,' or 'barbecue area,' making this one of the strongest features in the dataset. Evidence is broad and consistent across agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderately strong evidence the building offers concierge service: several different listings (at least six) explicitly mention 'concierge', '24/7 desk concierge', or 'attentive concierge and security'. While the MLS checkbox historically appeared on only a few listings, the repeated explicit mentions in current remarks across multiple agents support including concierge as a building feature.
Pet-specific outdoor space is repeatedly confirmed in the listings. Numerous remarks describe a 'dog park,' 'dog run,' 'pet park,' or dedicated pet area, sometimes with wash stations. This appears to be a genuine shared amenity rather than a checkbox error.
No analysis available
Exercise amenities are consistently supported across the listings. Roughly 20+ remarks reference a 'fitness center,' 'gym,' 'exercise room,' 'workout room,' or similar wording, often from different agents. This looks like a true shared building amenity, not a copy-paste artifact.
No analysis available
A meeting/conference-style common room is reasonably supported, though remarks use varied wording. Multiple listings cite a "party room," "club room," "resident lounge," or "gathering spaces," which are commonly used MLS proxies for a meeting room. The evidence is somewhat indirect but consistent with the historical amenity pattern.
The Collection has strong evidence of patio/deck-style outdoor living spaces. Multiple listings mention a 'covered lanai,' 'private lanai,' 'large lanai,' and amenity/recreation deck areas, with many also referencing BBQ cabanas and outdoor gathering spaces. The feature appears broadly supported across numerous remarks from different agents, reinforcing the prior high-confidence status.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Shared recreation-area amenities are repeatedly described in the remarks, especially as a 'recreation deck' or 'amenity deck.' Several listings also mention 'recreation spaces' or 'social spaces' alongside BBQs and pools. This is strong enough to confirm a building-level recreation area.
A recreation-room-type shared space is well supported by the remarks. Many listings refer to a 'recreation room,' 'party room,' 'club room,' or 'entertainment room with a full kitchen,' showing consistent building-level availability. The wording varies, but the amenity is clearly recurring.
Although the neighborhood is rich with nearby restaurants, there is no substantive evidence in public remarks of an on-site restaurant or café. MLS checkboxes (4/20) appear to reflect neighborhood proximity or inconsistent agent entries rather than a building-hosted dining facility.
No analysis available
A few detailed listings specifically advertise a 'sauna' together with the pool, whirlpool/hot tub, and fitness center, indicating a dedicated sauna facility in the common amenity area. Even though the MLS checkbox is less frequently used, these explicit textual mentions from multiple agents strongly support that a sauna is available to residents.
Storage is strongly confirmed at The Collection. Across the provided remarks, well over 20 listings mention it in varied forms, including "private storage locker," "storage locker," "large storage locker," "storage room," "extra storage," and "additional storage." The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and appears to be a genuine building feature, not a copy-paste artifact.
This feature is directly and repeatedly advertised across multiple public remarks. The building clearly offers dedicated surfboard storage facilities, often paired with bike storage.
No analysis available
Trash chute is strongly supported by the MLS pattern even though public remarks usually do not mention it. The high checkbox rate across listings suggests this is a real building utility rather than agent copy. Lack of remark mentions does not materially weaken it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Whirlpool/hot tub/spa amenities are strongly and repeatedly supported. Many listings explicitly call out 'whirlpool spa,' 'hot tub,' 'jacuzzi,' or even '2 hot tubs,' confirming the feature across multiple remarks. This is highly reliable building-level evidence.
The pool amenity is very strongly confirmed for The Collection. Far more than the threshold number of current listings mention it directly, with phrases like 'swimming pool,' 'infinity pool,' 'heated pool,' and 'resort-style amenities including a pool.' The consistency across many different remarks suggests this is a real shared building amenity, not a copy-paste error.
Heated pool is supported by both MLS history and current public remarks. Multiple listings explicitly describe a "heated pool," while others reference pool amenities without repeating the heating detail, indicating the heated feature is real and consistently marketed.
A public remark directly identifies the pool as a salt water pool. That is clear evidence supporting the salt-water pool feature.
In-unit laundry is strongly and consistently supported across the building. Multiple independent listings explicitly mention it, including “in-unit washer and dryer,” “full size washer and dryer,” “washer/dryer in unit,” and “stackable washer/dryer in unit,” indicating this is not a copy-paste anomaly. The evidence is robust across many agents and unit types, so this feature should be included.
No analysis available
I looked for public remarks indicating that shared laundry requires payment, such as coin laundry, card-operated machines, or quarters. No such wording appeared in the listings, so there is no evidence to confirm paid community laundry.
I searched the public remarks for wording like "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," and similar phrases. The only laundry references were to in-unit washer/dryer or a general mention of community laundry, with no evidence that laundry exists on every floor.
Parking is clearly a building-wide feature at The Collection. Dozens of remarks mention "2 assigned parking stalls," "side-by-side parking," "covered parking stall," "garage parking," and even guest parking, showing consistent support across many agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
Assigned/reserved parking is very well supported across the building. Numerous listings explicitly call out "assigned," "reserved," or specific stall numbers, including side-by-side and adjacent stalls, which appears consistent across many agents rather than a one-off copy/paste error. This is a stable building-level feature.
Covered parking is extremely well supported for The Collection. Many listings explicitly say "covered parking stall," "2 covered parking stalls," "secured/covered parking," or "garage" parking, confirming this as a consistent building feature across multiple remarks and agents.
I looked for explicit language like deeded parking, owned stall, parking included in the deed, or stall included with title. The remarks consistently say assigned, covered, or included stalls, but do not explicitly state that parking is deeded, so this should remain false based on public remarks only.
No analysis available
A specific monthly parking cost is explicitly stated in the remarks. The only clear fee found is for a second parking stall rented at $185 per month. That is the value supported by the public remarks.
Guest parking appears to be available in the building. Multiple listings directly mention "guest parking" or "ample guest parking stalls," which suggests this is not just a checkbox artifact. The evidence is strong enough to include for buyers searching for visitor parking.
Secured-entry parking is supported by both remarks and MLS indicators. Listings describe parking near a "secured entry gate" or past the "parking gate," which indicates controlled access rather than open parking. Evidence is consistent enough to treat as a building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit references to a parking waitlist system in the public remarks and found none. The listings instead consistently describe assigned stalls, guest parking, and storage, but do not indicate a waitlist process for parking.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for access-control language like keycard entry, fob access, or electronic/card-reader security. The listings mention security, concierge, and secured building/lobby, but nothing explicitly indicates card/fob access.
Security guard service is strongly supported for The Collection. Roughly 20+ public remarks mention it directly, including repeated wording such as "24-hour security," "24/7 security," and "security & concierge service," which suggests consistent building-wide service rather than a one-off agent note. The evidence is broad across multiple listings and appears repeatedly in different copy, reinforcing the feature with very high confidence.
I looked for explicit references to patrol service or roving security and found none. The remarks consistently mention 24-hour security, concierge, or security staff, but not a patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Split AC is strongly confirmed for The Collection. Across many current listings, numerous agents explicitly mention it in unit remarks, often with details such as "3 split AC units," "split AC through out," "split AC in every room," and "Mitsubishi split AC unit." The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and does not look like a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS history for The Collection. The current dataset shows 17 of 20 listings using CONCRE in construction_materials, which is a strong building-level signal and likely reflects repeated, consistent MLS input rather than a one-off entry. No public remarks explicitly dispute this, and the building’s type and scale are consistent with concrete construction.
Double wall construction has very weak support: only 3 of 20 current MLS listings check DOUWAL, and none of the public remarks mention double walls or any equivalent description. The evidence points to a likely MLS copy/paste error rather than a true building characteristic.
No analysis available
Only 1 of 20 current listings has MASSTU in construction_materials, while the public remarks across the listings focus on views, finishes, and amenities and do not describe the building’s exterior construction. Because there is no repeated remark evidence from multiple agents and the checkbox appears isolated, confidence is low and the feature is not validated.
Across 20 listings, there are 0 public-remark mentions of "steel frame" or similar wording. The listings consistently describe views, finishes, amenities, and parking, but never construction type details that would support steel-frame construction.
Across the provided listings, there are 0 public-remark mentions of "concrete slab" or "solid concrete foundation." The remarks focus on unit upgrades and amenities, so there is no evidence from the listing text that this building feature should be included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (including penthouse and high-floor units) describe a tall condo tower with views in every direction, indicating the residential structure is fully above ground. While only 4 of 20 MLS records explicitly check ABOGRO, nothing in the remarks or data suggests any below‑grade residential construction, so above‑ground construction is inferred for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for short-term rental indicators such as STR allowed/permitted, legal vacation rental, NUC, TVU, or related policy language, and found nothing. With no affirmative STR permission in the listings, the safest interpretation from the remarks is that STR is not allowed or at least not evidenced.
I looked for hotel rental pool, hotel-managed rental program, brand pool, or similar wording and found nothing. Because there is no evidence that STR is allowed, this feature must be false.
I searched for mandatory hotel-pool wording such as required participation, cannot opt out, or must be in the rental program and found nothing. Since STR is not evidenced as allowed, mandatory pool participation is also false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for leasehold language such as lease expires, ground lease ends, leasehold expiring, renewed through, or an explicit lease expiry year, and found nothing. Because no lease-related timing was mentioned, the expiry year remains unknown.
Public remarks directly mention an assumable VA mortgage, which is strong evidence that VA financing is accepted. No conflicting remarks were found. This is enough to mark the building as VA loan approved from the remarks alone.
The remarks repeatedly and explicitly indicate full building insurance coverage, including walls-in style language and direct statements that the building is "100% insured." This is strong, repeated evidence and supports a high-confidence true value.
Fire sprinkler coverage appears supported by the current MLS amenities data, with 14 of 20 listings showing FIRSPR. The public remarks do not explicitly call out sprinkler systems, but the repeated MLS amenity flag across many listings suggests this is a building feature rather than a one-off unit description.
I looked for explicit fire/life safety evaluation language, including "FLSE passed," "fire life safety evaluation passed," "life safety compliant," and "passed fire inspection." None of the public remarks included that type of certification or inspection result, so there is no evidence here that the building has passed FLSE.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are consistently and repeatedly confirmed across the building. Current remarks mention phrases like "ocean views," "Pacific Ocean," "Makai (Ocean)," "coastline views," and "front-row" views in many listings, with multiple agents describing unobstructed or panoramic ocean vistas. This appears to be strong building-level evidence rather than a one-off copy-paste.
Mountain views are clearly supported by multiple listings and multiple wording variants. Remarks reference “mountains,” “Koolau Mountains,” “mountain breezes,” and “views from the mountains to the ocean,” indicating this is not a one-off agent error.
Diamond Head is repeatedly called out in many listings: 'Diamond Head view', 'full Diamond Head view', 'view the Diamond Head crater', 'sunrise over Diamond Head' — evidence appears in many separate remarks and agent listings, confirming building offers Diamond Head views.
City views are strongly established at the building level. Multiple remarks reference "city skyline," "city lights," "downtown Honolulu," and combined ocean/city panoramas, confirming that some units offer city-facing views. The evidence appears repeatedly across listings from different agents and is not limited to a single unit.
Coastline/shoreline views are repeatedly confirmed in the current remarks. Listings mention “coastline views,” “southern coastline,” “coastal elegance,” and “ocean and coastline views,” supporting this as a legitimate building feature.
Across the entire set of public remarks there are no mentions of 'garden view', 'courtyard view' or 'landscaped view'. With no historical or current evidence and repeated other view mentions, there is high confidence the building does not advertise garden/courtyard views.
No analysis available
Harbor/marina-type views are present in the marketing (CURRENT: 5/20 mention harbor/marina). Several listings explicitly mention 'harbor views', 'Honolulu Harbor', and 'watch the cruise ships come in', supporting inclusion of marina/harbor views as a building feature.
Sunrise views/eastern exposure are explicitly called out in several listings (CURRENT: 5/20). Phrases like 'Waking up to the sunrise over Diamond Head', 'east-facing', and 'catch both the sunrise and the sunset' appear across multiple listings, indicating some units have sunrise views.
Sunset views are strongly supported by the remarks and historical MLS data. Around 10/20 listings explicitly include sunset views, with phrases like “sunset views,” “spectacular sunsets,” “nightly sunset,” and “Friday night fireworks.” This is consistent across many listings and appears to reflect a genuine feature of the building.
No analysis available
There are direct public remarks confirming fireworks views from units/lanai. This is strong, explicit evidence that residents can view Friday night fireworks from the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is supported by the current MLS amenities data, with 16 of 20 listings checking RESMAN. The public remarks mostly do not mention management staff directly, so the evidence is driven by the MLS checkbox pattern rather than repeated narrative descriptions. No contrary remarks suggest the feature was removed or misstated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.