The Block 803 Waimanu
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
The Block 803 Waimanu
Building Overview
The Block 803 Waimanu in Downtown-Chinatown (built 2021) — concrete construction with ocean and mountain views, resident manager on site.
About The Block 803 Waimanu
Based on MLS data, The Block 803 Waimanu is a concrete condominium project located in the Downtown-Chinatown neighborhood. The building was completed in 2021. Size and unit count information are not provided in the available MLS records.
According to available records, key features include ocean and mountain views, a resident manager, and split air conditioning in units. The listing data indicates that short-term rentals are not allowed and pets are not permitted.
MLS data shows parking is available and is covered and assigned. The management company and any association or maintenance fee details are listed as unknown or not provided in the MLS data. Buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or association, as this summary is based solely on MLS-derived information.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Multiple listings clearly state HHFDC program restrictions mandate owner-occupancy as primary residence, indicating strong owner-occupancy requirements, but no numeric owner-occupancy percentage is provided in the public remarks. Per rules, cannot assign a percentage without explicit numeric evidence.
Multiple listings reference elevator access and FOB access to elevators, but no public remark provides a specific number of elevators. Per rules, cannot infer a numeric value without an explicit number, so the count remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Across all provided remarks, there is no mention of cable TV being included in the maintenance fee, even in boilerplate project descriptions. With just 4/20 MLS entries checking CABTV and a strong marketing focus on low fees (without listing cable), it is very likely that residents pay for cable separately. This pattern points to occasional MLS checkbox errors rather than a true building-wide included service.
Multiple listings note shared common areas and terraces plus photovoltaic systems used to reduce building operating costs, consistent with HOA-covered common-area electricity. Although only 7/20 MLS entries explicitly mark OTCOEX, this looks more like inconsistent data entry than a real difference in what the HOA covers. Given the building type and descriptions, common-area power is very likely included in the maintenance fees.
No analysis available
No public remarks explicitly state 'electricity included' or 'power included in fees' (0 of the provided listings). MLS checkboxes show ELECTR on 5/20 records, but remarks only mention photovoltaic panels once as reducing fees—not that electricity is provided in HOA. Evidence points to checkbox copy/paste rather than a building‑wide included electricity utility.
No analysis available
No remarks mention 'hot water included' (0 of the provided listings) and many listings historically list water heaters (WTRHTR), indicating hot water is unit‑supplied. MLS data also shows HOTWAT unchecked across listings, supporting that hot water is not included in the HOA fees.
No public remarks explicitly state 'internet included' or 'wifi included' (0 of the provided listings), yet 11/20 MLS records check INTSER—likely checkbox inconsistency. Without explicit remarks or user verification describing included internet service, evidence indicates internet is not a confirmed HOA‑included utility.
No analysis available
There is essentially no textual evidence that sewer is covered by the HOA, with only a single MLS checkbox suggesting otherwise. Given the marketing emphasis on low fees and the absence of any 'water and sewer included' language, sewer is very likely not part of the maintenance fee package. The lone SEWER entry appears to be an outlier.
None of the provided public remarks say 'water included' or 'water in HOA' (0 of the provided listings). With only 3/20 MLS records checking WATER and no remarks or user verification confirming water is included, the balance of evidence indicates water is not included in the HOA fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building offers patios/decks: at least 10 listings (matching MLS checkbox count) explicitly mention outdoor spaces — phrases include "large private lanai," "direct lanai access to a shared deck/community herb garden," "common courtyard," "common area access to the lanai," and "three (3) separate open outdoor terraces for recreation." References appear across multiple listings and agents, indicating a genuine building amenity rather than isolated copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
While the listings mention bike storage, there is no reference to surfboard or board storage facilities in the public remarks. No evidence was found to indicate surfboard storage exists.
No analysis available
19 out of 20 current MLS listings for 803 Waimanu include the TRACHU amenity checkbox, indicating the building likely has a trash/garbage chute. None of the public remarks explicitly mention a "trash chute", "garbage chute", or "refuse chute", so confirmation is based on consistent amenity entries across multiple agents rather than explicit remarks; evidence is moderately strong but implied.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Public remarks make no reference to any pool, and the building context indicates no pool exists. Therefore a salt pool is effectively ruled out.
Strong, consistent evidence that units offer in-unit laundry: 19 of 20 historical listings included washer/dryer and the current remarks across multiple listings repeatedly state '2-in-1 washer/dryer' and 'in-unit washer/dryer' (one even notes a 'full-size front-load washer & dryer'). The language is consistent across many agents/remarks and confirms that some units in the building include in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
Listings emphasize in-unit washer/dryer and do not reference any paid community laundry facilities. No evidence of coin-op or card-operated laundry was found in the remarks.
Public remarks repeatedly state units have in-unit 2-in-1 washer/dryer but contain no language indicating community laundry on every floor. Searched all listings for floor-by-floor laundry wording and found none.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (MLS checkboxes: 12 of 20) and numerous public remarks explicitly mention covered or assigned parking — phrases include "covered parking included", "one covered parking stall", and "assigned parking". Evidence appears across several different listings/agents and corroborates the prior High-confidence assessment that the building offers covered parking.
Searched remarks for 'deeded parking' or 'owned stall'. Multiple listings repeatedly say parking is included/assigned/covered or 'one covered parking stall', but there is no explicit statement that parking is deeded, so deeded parking cannot be confirmed from the remarks.
No analysis available
Searched for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', 'additional parking cost', etc. The remarks only reference that parking is included or assigned; no recurring parking fee amount or charge is provided.
No analysis available
Across many listings, security is described for the building itself (e.g., 'secure building access,' 'The bldg is secure with FOB access to the entry and elevators') but there is no explicit mention of gated or secured parking. With only 3 of 20 MLS entries checking a secure-parking code and no supporting remarks, the evidence points to the building not being marketed as having separately secured parking entry. This is likely MLS checkbox noise rather than a consistent building-level amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched remarks for 'waitlist', 'waiting list for parking', and similar phrases. There is no evidence of a formal parking waitlist in the listings.
No analysis available
Listings explicitly state secure building access with FOB/key-fob to entry and elevators, which corresponds to card/fob access security.
No analysis available
Remarks mention secured access and FOBs but do not mention any security patrol or roving/patrolled service. No evidence of patrol service was found.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox ACSPL is set on 15 of 20 current listings. Multiple remarks mention air conditioning/AC and one listing explicitly states "split AC in the living room and bedroom," indicating some units have ductless mini-splits. Evidence is consistent across several agent remarks (though some copy/paste of features appears), so it's likely the building offers split/ductless AC in at least some units.
MLS inclusions indicate window AC (ACWIUN) on 5 of 20 recent listings, but 0 of ~40 public-remarks blocks explicitly mention window or wall air-conditioning; one listing explicitly states 'split AC in the living room and bedroom.' Evidence is inconsistent across agents and may reflect copy-paste checkbox errors—MLS checkbox support exists (5/20) but textual remarks do not corroborate.
Strong evidence that the building is concrete: historical MLS material flags show 16 of 20 listings listing 'CONCRE' and earlier analysis had High confidence. In the current remarks several ads explicitly call it a 'secured concrete high-rise' and many others describe it as a modern/high-rise boutique development, indicating consistent confirmation across multiple agents rather than an isolated claim.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Historical MLS data lists 'ABOGRO' on 4/20 listings and prior confidence was High. Multiple public remarks describe the property as a "secured concrete high-rise" and repeatedly reference a modern, multi-story boutique development (completed 2021), which supports that the building is constructed above ground; the language appears across several agent listings rather than a single copy/paste line.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Listings repeatedly cite HHFDC eligibility and program restrictions requiring units to be owner-occupied as the primary residence while the program is in effect. That explicit owner-occupancy requirement indicates short-term rentals are not permitted according to the public remarks.
Searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', and similar phrases. No evidence of participation in a hotel rental pool exists in the public remarks, and STRs are restricted by owner-occupancy requirements.
Looked for 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or statements about compulsory rental program participation. No such language appears; combined with owner-occupancy restrictions, there is no evidence of a mandatory rental pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Looked for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to YYYY', or renewal language. Although HHFDC program restrictions are cited, no specific 4-digit lease expiry year or leasehold expiration date is stated in the remarks.
Searched all remarks for 'VA approved', 'VA financing', and similar phrases. No listings reference VA loan approval or acceptance, so there is no evidence the building is VA-approved from the public remarks.
Public remarks explicitly state the building is fully insured (walls-in/full building coverage). This direct language supports a high-confidence true value for fully insured by HOA.
MLS amenity data lists fire sprinklers (FIRSPR) on 19 of 20 unit listings, indicating a building-wide sprinkler system. None of the public remarks explicitly mention sprinklers (0 listings mention 'sprinkler' or 'fire suppression'). The high and consistent presence of the FIRSPR checkbox across multiple listings/agents provides strong evidence the building has fire sprinklers, despite agents not mentioning it in remarks.
I searched all public remarks for explicit language indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation (FLSE) or related fire inspection certification and found no references. With no current value provided in the remarks, the field is set to false with medium confidence (absence likely means not stated publicly).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Although MLS view_descriptions currently showed 0/20 OCEAN entries, public remarks across the building repeatedly advertise ocean access: at least 5–7 separate listings say things like “peekaboo ocean view,” “partial ocean views,” and “Wake up and take in the breathtaking ocean views.” The consistency of explicit phrases across multiple listing remarks (not just a single copy/paste) supports including view_ocean = true so buyers searching for ocean-view units will find this building.
One current listing explicitly checks a mountain view in MLS view_descriptions, and none mark the view as 'none'. While public remarks emphasize ocean views and urban living rather than 'mountain views' by name, the high-rise nature and location in Kaka‘ako strongly suggest some units enjoy mountain/Koolau views. Evidence is moderate and driven mainly by MLS view data rather than repeated narrative remarks.
No analysis available
One listing flags 'CITY' in the MLS view field, and no listings indicate 'no view'. Remarks repeatedly describe the project as an urban high-rise in the heart of Kaka‘ako/Honolulu’s urban core, which is consistent with city/skyline views from at least some units. The support comes primarily from MLS view data plus the building’s setting, rather than repeated explicit 'city view' mentions in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Remarks describe partial or peekaboo ocean views from lanais but do not mention viewing Friday night fireworks from the building. No direct statements about fireworks views were found.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.