Tahitienne Inc
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Tahitienne Inc
Building Overview
Tahitienne Inc in Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis: concrete building (1957) with ocean and mountain views and split AC.
About Tahitienne Inc
Tahitienne Inc is located in the Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis neighborhood. According to available records the building was constructed in 1957 and is of concrete construction.
Key features noted in MLS data include ocean, mountain and sunset views and split air-conditioning. Pet ownership and short-term rentals are not allowed per the provided listing information.
Parking is available and assigned. Management company information is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all details, rules and any fees with the seller or managing agent before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water appears to be included in the maintenance/association fees. Current MLS data shows 4 out of 4 listings checked HOTWAT, and none show WTRHTR, so there is no indication that units rely on separately owned water heaters instead of building-supplied hot water.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is consistently included in the maintenance fees. All 4 current MLS listings checked SEWER, suggesting this is a stable building-level expense included in the association dues rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
Water is included in the association fees for this building. All 4 current listings report WATER in the fee inclusions, making this a strong, consistent building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence for patio/deck is mixed: 1 of the provided remarks clearly mentions a 'lanai,' while the rest describe oceanfront living without explicitly naming a common patio or deck. The current MLS data also shows PATDEC/COVPAT in 2 of 4 listings, which suggests the feature may be getting copy-pasted by agents rather than consistently verified.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across three listings for this building, 0/3 public remarks mention any recreation area, recreation deck, amenity deck, or shared recreation space. One listing’s MLS checkbox shows RECARE, but the absence of any remark-level references suggests this is likely an agent checkbox error rather than a true building amenity, so a common recreation area is probably not present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is supported by the current remarks in at least one listing and by MLS amenities appearing in 3 of 4 listings. Phrases like "Separate storage area" and "maximum storage" suggest the building offers storage/locker space or additional storage access. Overall this looks like a consistent building amenity, not just copy-paste noise.
I looked for surfboard storage, board storage, or related shared storage amenities and found nothing. The remarks mention surf and paddling activity, but not any dedicated storage for boards.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for any mention of a pool, including salt water or saltwater pool wording, and found none. Given the building context already says there is no pool, this remains false.
In-unit laundry is clearly supported by the listing remarks and current MLS inclusions. Multiple remarks explicitly state "in-unit washer and dryer," and current MLS data shows WASHER/DRYER in 4/4 listings, suggesting consistent agent reporting rather than a one-off checkbox.
There is no remark-based evidence for a shared laundry room, coin laundry, or laundry on each floor. Although 2/4 MLS listings check COMLAU, the absence of supporting language across multiple remarks makes this look like possible copy/paste or checkbox noise, so community laundry is not confirmed.
I searched for references to coin laundry, quarters, card-operated machines, or laundry fees and found nothing. The only laundry mention is an in-unit washer and dryer, so there is no evidence of paid community laundry.
I looked for language such as "laundry on every floor," "community laundry," or "floor laundry room" and found none. The remarks instead mention an in-unit washer and dryer, which does not support community laundry on every floor.
Parking is strongly supported: 4/4 MLS listings include a parking type in parking_features, and one remark explicitly states "2 parking spaces." This is consistent across the listings and does not look like a one-off agent error.
Assigned parking appears to be available in the building based on 3/4 current MLS listings showing ASSIGN in parking_features. While the remarks do not explicitly say "assigned" or "reserved," the repeated MLS pattern suggests this is a real building feature rather than a copy-paste artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for key card access, fob entry, electronic access, or card reader language. The only security-related wording is that the building is secure, which is not enough to confirm card-based access.
No analysis available
I searched for any reference to active security patrols or roving security and found none. The remarks only describe the building as secure, which does not indicate patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction is consistently indicated in the MLS data across all 4 current listings (4/4 marked CONCRE). None of the public remarks contradict this, so this appears to be a stable building-level characteristic rather than a copied one-off entry.
Two of the three listings report double wall construction via the DOUWAL code in MLS, which is likely a shared building construction characteristic rather than unit-specific. Remarks are silent on wall type but do not contradict this, so it is included as an implied feature.
No analysis available
Two of the three current listings list masonry/stucco (MASSTU) in the MLS, indicating it is likely part of the building’s construction. The absence of any conflicting remarks and typical construction patterns for similar oceanfront condos support including this feature with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Two of three listings mark above-ground construction (ABOGRO) in the MLS data, implying a consistent building characteristic. The oceanfront high-rise context and lack of any conflicting description in remarks support treating this as an accurate, building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Previously the building was recorded as having fire sprinklers (1 of 3 past MLS entries flagged FIRSPR) and historical confidence was High. In the current set, 0 of 3 listings check the FIRSPR amenity and none of the public remarks mention 'fire sprinkler' or related terms. The absence of remarks and recent unchecked boxes could be agent copy/paste corrections, but not enough to contradict the prior High-confidence record, so the feature is retained with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are clearly a building-level feature here. All 4/4 current listings show ocean in the view descriptions, and the remarks repeatedly use phrases like "oceanfront condo," "stunning ocean views," and "direct ocean access." This is strong consistent evidence across multiple listings and agents.
Mountain views appear in some units, based on current MLS data showing 2/4 listings with mountain-related view descriptions. The remarks themselves do not call out mountain views, so this is not as strong as the ocean/sunset evidence. It still suggests the building offers mountain-view units for some buyers.
Diamond Head views appear to be available in some units, with current MLS data showing 2/4 listings tagged with Diamond Head in the view field. The remarks strongly place the building near Diamond Head but stop short of explicitly stating a Diamond Head view, so this is moderate evidence rather than definitive.
No analysis available
Coastline-style views appear to be present in most listings, with 3/4 current MLS records showing coastline-related view descriptions. The remarks don't explicitly say "coastline view," but the repeated oceanfront/waterfront language and direct ocean access make this a reasonable inference. Evidence is fairly strong, though not as explicit as the ocean and sunset calls.
Across 3 listings, remarks focus entirely on oceanfront, water, and park proximity, with no mention of garden, courtyard, or landscaped views. Given the complete absence of garden-view language, this feature is not currently supported by available data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views are clearly supported across the listings. All 4/4 current listings show sunset in the view descriptions, and the remarks explicitly say "stunning ocean and sunset views." This looks like repeated copy-paste of a real building feature rather than an MLS error.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit references to seeing Friday night fireworks from the unit, lanai, or building. The remarks mention ocean, sunset, and waterfront views, but nothing about fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
This is very strong evidence the building is a cooperative: the listings explicitly mention 'Coop taxes are included in the maintenance fee,' and the current MLS data shows COOTAX in association_fee_includes across all 4 listings. The wording is consistent across multiple remarks and matches the historical high-confidence signal.
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.