Tahitienne Inc
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Tahitienne Inc
Building Overview
Tahitienne Inc in Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis: concrete building (1957) with ocean and mountain views and split AC.
About Tahitienne Inc
Tahitienne Inc is located in the Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis neighborhood. According to available records the building was constructed in 1957 and is of concrete construction.
Key features noted in MLS data include ocean, mountain and sunset views and split air-conditioning. Pet ownership and short-term rentals are not allowed per the provided listing information.
Parking is available and assigned. Management company information is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all details, rules and any fees with the seller or managing agent before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Electricity does not appear to be a consistent maintenance-fee inclusion for this building. Current MLS data is sparse here: just 1 of 5 listings checks ELECTR, while the remarks focus on the oceanfront setting and renovations rather than utility coverage.
No analysis available
Hot water appears to be included in the association/maintenance fees across the building. All 5 current MLS listings report HOTWAT, and none list WTRHTR, which strongly supports a stable building-level utility inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is consistently included in the maintenance fees for this building. The current MLS set is unanimous at 5 of 5 listings, reinforcing the earlier high-confidence finding.
Water is included in the association fees for this building. All 5 current MLS listings report WATER, making this a stable and highly consistent building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
2 of the provided remarks explicitly mention a lanai, including "a spacious lanai" and "oceanfront primary suite with lanai." The rest describe oceanfront living without contradicting outdoor space, so the evidence is consistent though not universal across all listings. This looks like genuine building/unit outdoor space rather than a one-off agent checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no remark-based evidence for private yard space in any of the listings reviewed. The descriptions focus on lanai/oceanfront living and direct ocean access, not yard access or fenced/private yard areas. With only 1 of 5 listings showing PRIYAR and no corroborating remarks, the feature should be omitted.
No analysis available
Across three listings for this building, 0/3 public remarks mention any recreation area, recreation deck, amenity deck, or shared recreation space. One listing’s MLS checkbox shows RECARE, but the absence of any remark-level references suggests this is likely an agent checkbox error rather than a true building amenity, so a common recreation area is probably not present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is strongly supported for this building. One current remark explicitly says "Separate storage area," and historical MLS data shows storage in 4 of 5 listings (mostly as an amenity, with one unit feature entry), which suggests this is a real building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
I looked for surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, or similar shared amenity language and found nothing. The remarks mention surf and paddle boarding activity out front, but not storage facilities for boards.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for any reference to a pool, including salt water, saltwater pool, or saline pool, and found none. The building context also indicates there is no pool, so there is no evidence supporting a salt pool.
In-unit laundry is clearly supported for this building. The feature is explicitly mentioned in multiple remarks with the phrase 'in-unit washer and dryer,' and the current MLS inclusions also show washer/dryer across all listings. This looks consistent across agents rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
There is no remark-based evidence for a shared laundry room, coin laundry, or laundry on each floor. Although 2/4 MLS listings check COMLAU, the absence of supporting language across multiple remarks makes this look like possible copy/paste or checkbox noise, so community laundry is not confirmed.
I searched for coin laundry, quarters, card-operated machines, laundry fees, or other paid laundry language and found nothing. The only laundry reference is an in-unit washer and dryer, so there is no evidence of paid community laundry.
I looked for wording such as "laundry on every floor," "community laundry," or "floor laundry room" and found none. The remarks instead mention an in-unit washer and dryer, which does not indicate shared laundry on each floor.
Parking is strongly supported for this building. All 5 current MLS listings include a parking type in parking_features, and one listing explicitly mentions "2 parking spaces," confirming the building offers parking. The evidence is consistent across listings and does not appear to rely on a single agent note.
Assigned parking appears to be available in the building. Four of the five current MLS listings mark ASSIGN in parking_features, and the listing remarks also support parking availability with "2 parking spaces." This is strong enough to treat assigned/reserved parking as a building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for key card access, fob entry, card reader, electronic access, or keycard language and found none. The remarks only say the building is secure, which does not confirm a card-based security system.
No analysis available
I searched for security patrol, roving security, patrol service, or patrolled-building language and found none. The remarks mention a secure building but do not describe any active patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, split AC is never explicitly mentioned, while one listing specifically says 'Central AC.' The current MLS ACSPL checkbox appears in only 2 of 5 listings and is not reinforced by the remarks, which suggests weak/possibly copied data rather than verified building equipment.
No analysis available
Concrete construction is consistently indicated in the MLS data across all current listings (5/5 marked CONCRE). The public remarks do not discuss construction, but the repeated MLS coding across multiple listings supports this as a building-level feature with very high confidence.
Double wall construction appears in 3 of 5 current MLS listings via the DOUWAL code. The remarks across listings do not explicitly confirm or contradict it, so this looks like moderate-confidence MLS evidence rather than a fully verified feature.
No analysis available
Two of the three current listings list masonry/stucco (MASSTU) in the MLS, indicating it is likely part of the building’s construction. The absence of any conflicting remarks and typical construction patterns for similar oceanfront condos support including this feature with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Two of three listings mark above-ground construction (ABOGRO) in the MLS data, implying a consistent building characteristic. The oceanfront high-rise context and lack of any conflicting description in remarks support treating this as an accurate, building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Previously the building was recorded as having fire sprinklers (1 of 3 past MLS entries flagged FIRSPR) and historical confidence was High. In the current set, 0 of 3 listings check the FIRSPR amenity and none of the public remarks mention 'fire sprinkler' or related terms. The absence of remarks and recent unchecked boxes could be agent copy/paste corrections, but not enough to contradict the prior High-confidence record, so the feature is retained with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are clearly a building-level feature. All current listings indicate ocean views, and multiple remarks explicitly reinforce this with phrases like 'direct oceanfront,' 'endless blue water views,' and 'expansive ocean views.'
Mountain views appear to be available in some units in the building based on current MLS data. The public remarks do not emphasize mountain views, but the MLS view field suggests this is a legitimate building offering rather than a one-off error.
Diamond Head views are strongly supported by both MLS data and remarks. Multiple listings situate the building at the base/foot of Diamond Head, and current records show Diamond Head in the view descriptions for several units.
No analysis available
Coastline views appear to be present in most listings and are consistent with the building’s Gold Coast/oceanfront setting. The remarks do not use the exact phrase 'coastline view' often, but they repeatedly describe coastal and waterfront living, supporting the MLS pattern.
Across 3 listings, remarks focus entirely on oceanfront, water, and park proximity, with no mention of garden, courtyard, or landscaped views. Given the complete absence of garden-view language, this feature is not currently supported by available data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views are a clear building-level feature. Every current listing shows sunset in the view data, and the remarks consistently confirm it with multiple direct references to sunsets and evening light.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit references to viewing Friday night fireworks from the unit, lanai, or building and found none. The remarks mention ocean, sunset, surf, and waterfront views, but not fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
This is very strong cooperative evidence across all 5 listings: the MLS includes COOTAX in association_fee_includes, and multiple remarks say "Coop taxes are included in the maintenance fee." The consistency across listings suggests this is not copy-paste noise but a true building-level cooperative structure. Confidence is very high.
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.