Sunset Lakeview
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Sunset Lakeview
Building Overview
Sunset Lakeview in Downtown-Chinatown — 1972 concrete building with ocean and sunset views and on-site pool.
About Sunset Lakeview
Sunset Lakeview is a residential building located in the Downtown-Chinatown neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1972 and is of concrete construction. Elevators: 3. Air conditioning is provided via split systems.
Key amenities include a pool, fitness center, BBQ area, a resident manager, and a security guard. The property offers ocean, mountain, and sunset views. Short-term rentals are not allowed and pets are not allowed, per the MLS data.
Parking is available on-site with covered, assigned stalls and guest parking. Management company information is listed as unknown in the MLS. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all building details, rules, and any fees with the listing agent or building management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for explicit owner-occupancy language such as a percentage, "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied," but found nothing. The listings focus on amenities, renovations, security, and location, not ownership composition, so there is no reliable evidence to estimate this percentage.
Multiple remarks directly identify Sunset Lakeview as having 3 elevators, matching the current building context. I looked for any conflicting elevator count or language like "multiple elevators," but found none.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV inclusion is not evidenced in the remarks. Only 1 of 20 current MLS listings checks CABTV, and none of the listings explicitly say cable is included in the HOA/maintenance fee. This looks like either a one-off agent checkbox or an unverified entry, so the feature should not be treated as building-level included.
Common area electricity appears to be included in the maintenance fee. Current MLS checkbox data supports this strongly, with 16 of 20 listings showing OTCOEX. The remarks do not explicitly restate it, but the volume of checkbox agreement across multiple listings is strong and consistent.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water does not appear to be included in the maintenance fee. Only 1 of 20 current listings checks HOTWAT, while many list WTRHTR, which is a strong indicator that hot water is produced by unit water heaters instead of building service. Several remarks even mention a new water heater in the unit, making the building-supplied hot water interpretation unlikely.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is very likely included in the HOA/maintenance fee. This is backed by 18 of 20 current MLS listings checking SEWER, which is extremely strong building-level evidence. The remarks do not contradict it, and the checkbox pattern is consistent enough to treat as confirmed.
Water appears to be included in the maintenance fee. The current MLS data is very strong, with 18 of 20 listings checking WATER. No public remarks contradict this, so this should be treated as a confirmed building feature.
BBQ/grilling facilities are well supported by the listing remarks, with repeated phrases such as 'BBQ area' and 'BBQ grilling area.' The current MLS amenity data also shows 18/20 listings checking BBQ, indicating strong and recurring evidence across multiple agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Limited evidence: MLS shows car wash checked in a few listings (~4/20) and at least one public remark explicitly lists 'car wash'. Because mentions are sparse and may reflect limited/common-area facility, confidence is moderate.
Across extensive remarks for many units, agents consistently list amenities like pool, gym, recreation room/area, game room, BBQ, dog park, and playground but never mention a 'clubhouse' or 'community center.' Given the low MLS checkbox frequency (2/20) and the repeated omission from detailed amenity descriptions, it is very likely the building does not have a clubhouse.
No analysis available
Dog park/pet area is clearly part of the building offerings. About 10 of 20 historical listings check the amenity, and many remarks explicitly describe a 'dog park' or 'mini dog park,' making this a reliable building-level feature.
No analysis available
Exercise room support is very strong across the listings: many remarks explicitly say 'fitness center,' 'exercise room,' 'gym,' or 'weight room.' This aligns with the current MLS data showing 18/20 listings including the amenity, so this appears to be a consistently present building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
Meeting room evidence is present but limited. The MLS data shows only 3/20 listings checking the amenity, but one remark explicitly includes 'meeting room' along with other building amenities, so this is supported but less consistently than the other features.
Strong, consistent evidence across many listings indicates the building offers patios/decks (lanais). At least 15 separate remarks explicitly mention 'lanai', 'covered lanai', 'extra-large lanai', or 'patio' (examples: 'extra-large lanai', '48-square-foot covered lanai', 'large covered lanai'). Evidence is present across multiple agent listings and matches prior high-confidence historical data, so include the feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Recreation-area evidence is strong and recurring. The remarks include several direct references such as 'recreation area,' 'rec room,' 'recreation rooms,' and 'recreation deck,' which matches the MLS pattern of 15/20 listings including the amenity.
Recreation room is supported by both MLS history and recurring remarks. Around 9 of 20 listings check RECROO, while multiple descriptions mention 'rec room,' 'recreation room,' 'game room,' and 'entertainment room,' suggesting a real shared amenity even if not every agent lists it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sauna is strongly supported across the data. Roughly 14 of 20 listings include it in MLS, and the public remarks repeatedly list 'sauna' among the building amenities, so this appears consistent and reliable.
Both MLS checkbox data and listing remarks support that the building provides storage. At least 8 separate public-remarks entries mention lanai storage or an extra storage closet (quotes include 'storage closet on the lanai', 'extra storage closet', and 'storage room on the lanai'), and multiple agents consistently list storage as a unit/lanai feature rather than a single isolated mention.
I looked for surfboard storage-related wording such as surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, or bike-and-surfboard storage and found nothing. The remarks mention storage closets and lanai storage, but not any surfboard-specific facility.
No analysis available
Trash chute is well supported by the MLS data and at least one explicit public remark. With 16/20 listings checking TRACHU and a remark naming a 'trash chute,' this appears to be a genuine building feature rather than an MLS copy-paste artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence confirms Sunset Lakeview has a shared swimming pool amenity. Across the provided remarks, roughly 30+ listings explicitly mention "pool," "two pools," or "large pool," often alongside other shared amenities like sauna and gym, suggesting consistent building-level access rather than copy-paste error. Current remarks reinforce the existing high-confidence MLS amenity data with no meaningful contradiction.
No analysis available
I searched for terms like salt water pool, saltwater pool, salt pool, or saline pool and found no evidence. The building is repeatedly described as having pools, but the water type is never specified.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the listings: many separate remarks explicitly say 'washer and dryer in unit,' 'full size washer and dryer in unit,' or similar wording. This appears consistent across multiple agents and listings rather than a copy-paste anomaly, and the current data aligns with the historical MLS pattern of 19/20 listings showing washer/dryer inclusions.
No analysis available
I looked for public remarks indicating paid community laundry, such as coin laundry, coin-op, card-operated machines, or quarters, and found nothing. The remarks focus on in-unit laundry convenience instead of shared paid laundry facilities.
I searched for wording like "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," or similar floor-by-floor laundry references and found none. The public remarks consistently describe washer/dryer in the unit, which does not support community laundry on every floor.
Parking is strongly confirmed across the building. Multiple listings mention phrases like "2 pkg (tandem)", "1 open Parking", "assigned parking stall", and "guest parking," while current MLS data shows parking features on all 20 listings. The evidence is consistent across many remarks and appears to reflect the building reliably rather than a one-off agent error.
Assigned parking is well supported at the building level. About 16 of 20 current listings flag assigned parking, and many remarks explicitly describe designated or assigned stalls, including tandem and single-stall examples. The consistency across multiple listings suggests this is a real and common building feature, not just copy-paste noise.
Although fewer listings note covered parking, several remarks explicitly mention covered/tandem stalls and parking under PV panels (at least 4–6 listings), e.g., 'two covered tandem parking stalls' and 'tandem pkg under the PV panels', which supports including covered parking at the building level.
I looked for explicit deeded-parking language such as deeded parking, owned stall, parking included in deed, or parking stall included. Instead, the listings refer to assigned parking, guest parking, and the ability to rent a second stall or additional stalls, which points away from deeded parking.
No analysis available
A specific monthly parking cost is stated in the remarks, so this is a documented parking fee. The public remarks do not indicate a building-wide mandatory parking fee, but they do provide a clear monthly rental amount for an extra stall.
Guest parking is clearly supported for Sunset Lakeview. Roughly 11 of 20 current listings include GUEST in MLS, and multiple remarks explicitly reference guest stalls, visitor parking, or plenty of guest parking. This appears to be a genuine shared amenity consistently advertised by different agents.
No analysis available
Tandem parking is strongly confirmed at the building. Around 9 of 20 current listings flag TANDEM, and the remarks repeatedly and explicitly describe tandem stalls, including covered tandem, extra-large tandem, and assigned tandem parking. The repeated phrasing across several listings supports this as a real building-level parking option.
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist, waiting list, or join the waitlist for parking and found no such references. The remarks describe renting an extra stall from another owner or from neighbors, which suggests informal rental arrangements rather than a formal waitlist system.
No analysis available
The remarks clearly support card/fob access security. Multiple listings reference secure FOB entry or fob-required entry, which matches a building-level electronic access system.
Security service is strongly supported across the listing set: well over half of the listings explicitly mention 24-hour security, security patrols, on-site security, or a security office, and several remarks repeat the same amenity across different agents. This looks like a real building-level feature rather than a copy/paste error, so it should remain included.
The listings repeatedly describe patrol-based security, including 24-hour security patrol and security patrols. This is strong public-remark evidence that the building has security patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Split AC is explicitly mentioned in several current remarks, including the phrase "split A/C system." Historical MLS data also shows ACSPL checked in 3 of 20 listings, which is consistent with the remarks and suggests this is a real building feature offered in at least some units. The repeated wording across listings looks like agent copy-paste, but the feature itself is clearly supported.
Across the provided remarks, 0 listings explicitly mention window air conditioning, window units, or wall AC. Multiple listings instead mention split A/C or rely on trade winds/natural breezes, which does not support window AC for the building. Based on the weak historical MLS signal and lack of remark confirmation, this feature appears unsupported.
Concrete construction is strongly supported across the listings. Historical MLS data shows 18/20 listings marked CONCRE, and current remarks include an explicit phrase like "concrete walls" plus references to a solid, quiet building. This looks consistent across multiple agents rather than a copy-paste error, so the feature should be retained.
Unclear evidence for double-wall construction: 3 of 20 current MLS records check double-wall, but none of the provided public remarks mention "double wall" or similar phrasing. Because past data indicated the feature and there is no overwhelming contradictory evidence in remarks, the feature is retained with moderate confidence pending owner/site verification.
No analysis available
There is no public-remark support for masonry and stucco construction across the listings reviewed. The remarks consistently focus on concrete/CMU construction details instead, and the low current MLS usage (2/20) looks more like inconsistent checkbox data than a verified feature. This is a high-confidence correction to false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Three of 20 current MLS listings (per construction_materials) list BRICK, but none of the aggregated public remarks mention brick construction; many remarks instead reference concrete/CMU walls. Because only a small subset of listings check the brick box and there is no corroborating language in agent remarks or owner verification, inclusion of 'brick' is possible but uncertain—low confidence (3/20 listings, no supporting remarks; may be copy/paste error).
No analysis available
I looked for short-term rental indicators such as STR permitted, vacation rental allowed, NUC, TVU, or 30-day minimum language, but found none. Since the listings consistently present this as a standard residential condo building with no rental-program references, the evidence supports STR not being allowed.
I searched for hotel rental pool, hotel program, branded rental management, and similar terms, but found nothing. Because there is no evidence that STR is allowed, this feature must also be false.
I looked for language like mandatory hotel pool, required participation, cannot opt out, or must rent through a program, but found none. With no indication of any hotel rental pool and no evidence that STR is allowed, this feature is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for phrases like lease expires, land lease to, ground lease, and renewal/extension terms, but found nothing. The listings only describe the building, amenities, and parking, so there is no evidence to extract a lease expiry year.
Public remarks provide direct evidence that VA financing is allowed. Multiple listings reference VA approval and VA assumption, which is strong building-level support. This is not just one offhand mention; it appears repeatedly across remarks.
The remarks directly say the building has 100% hurricane insurance, which is strong evidence of full building insurance coverage. I searched for any indication of partial or limited coverage and found none.
Multiple listings explicitly describe a building-wide sprinkler retrofit: examples include “completed fire sprinkler system,” “recently installed SPRINKLER SYSTEM,” and “new fire sprinkler system has been recently installed.” While the MLS checkbox currently appears on 3 of 20 listings, at least 4–5 independent public remarks from different listings reference the system and some describe it as newly completed, providing strong corroborating evidence that the building has a fire sprinkler system.
I found repeated public remarks indicating major fire/life-safety upgrades, including a new fire alarm system and a completed fire sprinkler system. While the remarks do not use the exact phrase "FLSE passed," the evidence strongly supports a passed/compliant fire life safety status.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are supported by both history and current remarks. At least one listing explicitly mentions 'Pacific Ocean' views, and the prior summary also referenced ocean/Pacific views. This appears to be a real building-level offering rather than a one-off checkbox artifact.
Mountain views are strongly supported across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly say 'mountain views' and one describes 'Ko'olau Mountains,' confirming this is a genuine building feature available to some units. The consistency across agents suggests reliable data rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
City views are clearly supported by the listing remarks. At least 2 listings explicitly say "city views" or "mountain and city views," and the historical MLS pattern shows city view data recurring across the building. This is strong building-level evidence that some units offer city views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views are repeatedly confirmed in current remarks, including phrases like 'offers mountain, rainbows, and sunset views' and 'beautiful sunset lake views.' At least several listings mention sunset-related views, indicating this is a genuine feature of the building for some units. The evidence is strong and consistent across multiple remarks.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit references to seeing Friday night fireworks from the building or unit, including lanai views, and found none. The remarks mention mountain, sunset, ocean, city, and skyline views, but not fireworks views.
No analysis available
Resident manager is strongly supported across the listing history. At least 2 current remarks explicitly say 'Resident Manager' / 'Manager on Property,' and the MLS data shows the RESMAN amenity in 16 of 20 listings. This is consistent across multiple agent remarks, so it appears to be a genuine on-site building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.