
Summer Villa
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Summer Villa
Building Overview
Summer Villa in Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis — 1979 concrete building with ocean and Diamond Head views and on-site pool.

About Summer Villa
Based on MLS data, Summer Villa is located in the Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis neighborhood. The building was constructed in 1979 of concrete. Size and unit count are not provided in the available MLS data.
Key features reported include ocean, mountain, Diamond Head and sunset views. On-site amenities listed in MLS records include a pool, a BBQ area and a resident manager.
Additional details from the MLS indicate covered, assigned parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS. Buyers should verify all information and any fees, rules or other details with listing agents or management, as this summary is based on available MLS data.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for any owner-occupancy statements (e.g., '80% owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied', 'highly owner occupied') and found no such language. Because owner-occupancy is a numeric/percentage field and no explicit value appears in the public remarks, I will not estimate and leave the value unknown.
I searched all public remarks for explicit mentions of elevators (e.g., '4 elevators', 'four elevators', 'multiple elevators') and found no references. Because there is no explicit elevator count in the remarks and no current numeric value provided, I cannot infer a number and will not guess.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Both historical MLS data (12/18 listings flagged OTCOEX) and current public remarks confirm common-area/common-expense coverage. Multiple remarks explicitly state 'other common expenses', 'common expenses', or 'common area insurance' are included in the maintenance fee, indicating consistent, building-level coverage rather than isolated or erroneous entries.
No analysis available
Historical MLS flags (17/18) and many agent remarks explicitly state electricity is included in the maintenance fee (e.g., 'Maintenance fee includes electricity', 'electricity INCLUDED in its maintenance fee'), showing consistent confirmation across multiple listings rather than isolated copy/paste.
No analysis available
Current remarks and MLS flags (14/18) repeatedly list 'hot water' among the utilities included ('Maintenance fee includes ... hot water'), and there are no indications of unit-level water heaters (WTRHTR) that would contradict this, supporting building-level hot water inclusion.
MLS data shows internet flagged in 6/18 listings and the public remarks explicitly include 'internet' in the list of included utilities in multiple places (e.g., 'ALL UTILITIES ... & internet', 'Maintenance fee includes ... Internet'), indicating building-level internet is offered in at least some units and is confirmed by agent remarks.
No analysis available
Both MLS flags (17/18) and many agent remarks explicitly list sewer as included ('Maintenance fee includes ... sewer'), consistently confirming that sewer costs are covered by the maintenance fee across the building's listings.
MLS data (17/18) and multiple agent remarks confirm water is included in the maintenance fee ('Maintenance fee includes ... water'), with consistent, cross-listing confirmation indicating building-level water coverage.
Multiple agent remarks (about 8 listings) explicitly reference BBQ or 'BBQ area'/'BBQ on site' and cabana grills/tables for get-togethers, matching historical high confidence that the building offers common BBQ/grilling facilities. Mentions come from several different listings/agents rather than a single isolated remark.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only one listing's public remarks explicitly mention a 'car wash' on site, while most other remarks do not mention it. MLS checkbox data shows some units listing car wash, but the sparse mention across agent remarks suggests possible agent checkbox/copy-paste; included because at least one remark asserts the amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple agent remarks (about 4) describe a 'recreation area' or pool-side recreation/cabana space for gatherings, supporting the historical finding that the building offers outdoor/common recreation area amenities.
Several listings (about 4) explicitly mention a recreation or meeting room (e.g., 'recreation room', 'meeting room', 'pool & meeting room'), corroborating historical data that the building has an indoor common recreation room available to residents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', and related terms. Amenities and storage mentions focus on in-unit storage, parking, guest parking, and common areas; there is no evidence of dedicated surfboard storage.
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence across listings: multiple remarks explicitly note 'trash chute' or 'trash chute on every floor' (and MLS shows 18/18). This provides high-confidence confirmation that the building has a trash chute system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All current MLS listings (18/18) list a pool amenity and numerous unit remarks explicitly mention 'pool' or 'swimming pool' (examples: 'amenities including pool,' 'swimming pool,' 'Outdoor pool on property'). Evidence is consistent across multiple agents and listings and aligns with prior high-confidence data that the building offers a shared swimming pool.
No analysis available
I specifically searched for 'salt water', 'saltwater', 'saline', and similar terms in the public remarks. While a pool is repeatedly mentioned, there is no indication that it is a saltwater pool.
Strong and consistent evidence: all 18 current MLS listings note in-unit laundry. Remarks repeatedly state "in-unit washer/dryer", "washer & dryer in the unit", or "stackable washer-dryer" across multiple agent listings, supporting a high-confidence determination that units in this building offer in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for 'coin laundry', 'paid laundry', 'coin-op', 'card operated', and similar terms. All listings emphasize in-unit washer/dryer and contain no references to paid community laundry.
I searched for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and 'floor-by-floor laundry'. Listings repeatedly highlight in-unit washer/dryer and do not describe community laundry on any floor, so there is no evidence of laundry on every floor.
All 18 current MLS listings include parking features and multiple agent remarks explicitly reference assigned and covered stalls and garage access (examples: '1 assigned parking stall', 'secured covered parking', 'gated garage stall'). Evidence is consistent across many listings and agents, indicating the building provides parking.
Assigned/reserved stalls are repeatedly mentioned in agent remarks (phrases like '1 assigned parking stall', '1-assigned/secured parking stall', 'assigned covered parking in a secured garage') and 17 of 18 MLS records include ASSIGN, providing strong, consistent evidence that the building offers assigned parking.
Many listings and remarks describe covered or garage parking (for example 'one assigned covered parking in a secured garage', 'secured covered parking', 'covered parking stall'), and 15 of 18 MLS records list covered/garage options—strong corroboration that covered parking is available.
Multiple listings describe assigned/covered/secured parking stalls, but none explicitly state the parking is deeded (included in the property deed). Without explicit wording indicating deeded parking, we cannot conclude it is deeded.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for terms like 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', and 'parking rental' but found no references. Because there is no evidence either way, the monthly parking fee is unknown.
Guest parking is called out in multiple remarks (e.g., 'guest parking', 'Even your guest parking is secure!') and 10 of 18 MLS listings include a GUEST checkbox, indicating the building provides guest/visitor parking for residents' guests.
Security features for parking are frequently mentioned across remarks—phrases such as 'secured garage entry', 'gated parking', 'secured access to the building and parking' appear repeatedly—and 12 of 18 MLS records include secured-entry flags, providing strong evidence that parking has secured entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for phrases such as 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list', or 'join waitlist for parking' and found nothing. Listings describe assigned or guest parking but do not reference a waitlist system.
No analysis available
I looked for 'key card access', 'fob access', 'card reader', 'keycard entry' and similar terms. The remarks mention secured entry, gated garage, and a Lockly smart lock on an entry door, but do not explicitly describe a building-wide card/fob access system.
No analysis available
I searched for 'security patrol', 'roving security', 'patrol service', and similar phrases. The public remarks only reference a resident manager and secured entry, with no indication of a security patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across 17 of 18 recent MLS listings agents marked the building's construction as concrete (e.g., CONCRE). Public remarks for individual units do not explicitly mention construction type, but the high and consistent MLS checkbox usage across many listings indicates strong evidence the building is constructed of concrete rather than being an agent error.
Only 2 of 18 MLS listings include double-wall (DOUWAL) and none of the public remarks mention double-wall construction. With no supporting remarks and low prevalence across listings, evidence for double-wall construction is weak and likely inconsistent agent reporting.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 1 of 18 MLS listings includes steel frame (STEFRA) and none of the public remarks mention 'steel frame' or similar. Given the absence of corroborating remarks and the very low prevalence among listings, there is weak evidence for steel-frame construction and it is likely an agent checkbox anomaly.
Just 2 of 18 MLS listings check 'slab' and none of the public remarks mention a concrete slab foundation. The low frequency and lack of explicit remarks provide only weak evidence for a slab foundation; this is likely inconsistent checkbox usage rather than confirmed building characteristic.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Remarks repeatedly reference high-floor units with expansive views (e.g., “9th floor Summer Villa unit,” “high floor one-bedroom,” “looking out over Waikiki with beautiful Diamond Head views”), showing that all residential space is in an elevated, above-grade structure. Although only 2 of 17 listings explicitly check the ABOGRO box, the physical description of a multi-story tower above a secured/covered garage strongly supports above-ground construction. This is treated as an implied but consistent building-level characteristic.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for 'short-term rental', 'vacation rental', 'STR', 'TVU', 'NUC', and '30-day minimum' across all remarks and found no evidence that STRs are allowed. In absence of explicit permission language, this is reported as false with moderate-low confidence.
I searched the remarks for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', and related phrases and found none. Because short-term rentals are not indicated and there is no hotel pool language, this is false.
I looked for wording like 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or 'must be in rental program' but found nothing. Without evidence of hotel pool participation (let alone mandatory participation), this is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Remarks describe the units/building as fee simple and do not mention any leasehold or lease expiry year. Therefore lease expiry is not applicable and no year can be extracted.
Multiple public remarks explicitly state the building is VA approved, indicating VA financing is accepted. Several independent listings repeat this wording, so this is reported as true with high confidence.
Several public remarks explicitly reference building-level insurance, including specific language that the building 'has 100% Hurricane & Flood Insurance coverage.' That explicit statement supports marking the building as fully insured by the HOA (walls-in coverage) with high confidence.
No analysis available
I reviewed the public remarks for explicit statements that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation (e.g., 'FLSE passed', 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'passed fire inspection') and found none. With no explicit mention and no current verification provided, the absence of any FLSE language leads to a default false at medium confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
At least 2 of 18 current listings list OCEAN in view_descriptions and several public remarks explicitly note 'partial ocean views' or 'ocean' from the lanai. Evidence is consistent across multiple listings/agents, supporting that some units in the building offer ocean views.
Several remarks highlight 'beautiful mountain views from the lanai' and 'expansive mauka views,' showing that mountain-facing units exist in the building. MLS data backs this up with 5/17 listings tagging mountain views and none indicating no view. Buyers seeking mountain/mauka views can find them at this property.
Diamond Head is frequently mentioned across listings (10/18 in current MLS) with lines such as 'Enjoy breathtaking Diamond Head view' and 'views of Diamond Head...from the lanai.' Multiple agents independently emphasize this view, providing strong evidence that many units have Diamond Head views.
City/Waikiki skyline views are commonly cited in the remarks and appear in 11 of 18 current MLS view_descriptions. Repeated, consistent language across multiple listings indicates the building offers city skyline views from several units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Ala Wai Golf Course views are cited across many listings (9/18 in current MLS) with phrases like 'lanai overlooking Ala Wai Golf Course' and 'Ala Wai golf course view.' Multiple agents independently reference this, indicating several units have golf course views.
No analysis available
Only 1 of 18 current MLS listings lists SUNRIS and there are no explicit 'sunrise' or 'eastern exposure' statements in the public remarks. Because the MLS checkbox is present for a small number of listings but remarks don't confirm it, sunrise is possible for a unit but evidence is weak.
Remarks include direct references to sunsets like 'ever-changing sunset sky over Waikiki skylines,' 'vibrant sunsets,' and watching the 'sunset views' from the lanai, indicating a favorable orientation in some stacks. MLS data supports this with 4/17 listings checking SUNSET and none reporting no view. The building therefore offers sunset-view units attractive to sunset-focused buyers.
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly state that the lanai/units allow viewing of Friday night fireworks (e.g., '...especially during the Friday fireworks'), providing strong evidence that the building has fireworks views from units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
High-confidence evidence that the building has a resident manager: MLS amenities show RESMAN on 18/18 listings and many public remarks explicitly state phrases like 'resident manager' and 'resident manager on site'. Multiple agents independently mention the on-site manager (e.g., 'resident manager', 'resident manager on site'), indicating the feature is consistently reported across listings rather than a lone copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.