Su Casa
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Su Casa
Building Overview
Su Casa in Waipahu — concrete building (1968) with on-site security guard; parking available. Pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Su Casa
Su Casa is a residential building located in the Waipahu neighborhood. According to available records the building was constructed in 1968 and is of concrete construction. Specific unit sizes and total number of units are not provided in the MLS data.
Key features listed in the MLS include an on-site security guard. Building management details are unknown in the available data.
Parking is indicated as available. Pet ownership and short-term rentals are not allowed per the MLS information. Buyers should verify all building details, fees, policies and management information independently; this summary is based on MLS data available for Su Casa.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Searched the remarks for any numerical or descriptive statements about owner-occupancy (e.g., percentage values or 'majority owner occupied') and found none. Because there is no current value and no explicit evidence in the remarks, owner_occupancy is unknown (null) with low confidence.
Multiple listings explicitly describe the property as a 'three story walk-up' and mention stairways, which indicates the building does not have elevators. Based on these explicit remarks, the number of elevators is set to 0 with high confidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence indicates hot water is not included in HOA fees: 12/20 listings list WTRHTR (water heater) in inclusions and multiple remarks reference a unit water heater. Only 1/20 listings show HOTWAT in association_fee_includes, suggesting the building does not supply hot water and agents who checked HOTWAT are likely inconsistent/copy-paste errors.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that sewer is included: 17/20 listings have SEWER checked in association_fee_includes and at least one public remark explicitly states 'maintenance fee includes water, sewer,' with that language appearing consistently across listings, indicating broad agent agreement rather than an isolated error.
Strong evidence that water is included: 17/20 listings have WATER in association_fee_includes and listings' public remarks explicitly mention 'maintenance fee includes water, sewer,' indicating the building's HOA fee covers water for units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for 'surfboard', 'board storage', 'surf storage' and related terms and found nothing. With no explicit mention, there's no evidence the building provides surfboard storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no pool described in the remarks and the building context shows pool=False. I searched for 'salt water pool', 'saltwater', 'saline pool' and found nothing; therefore a salt pool is not present.
No analysis available
MLS amenities show COMLAU in 20 of 20 current listings for this building. Public remarks explicitly include the phrase "Community Laundry. On-site building manager." Evidence is consistent across MLS data and at least one agent remark, supporting high confidence that the building has shared laundry facilities.
Remarks mention 'Community Laundry' but contain no indication of payment method. I searched for 'coin', 'card', 'paid', 'coin-op', and related terms and found none, so there is no evidence the laundry requires payment.
Public remarks explicitly mention 'Community Laundry.' I searched for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and similar wording but found none, so there is no evidence the laundry is on every floor.
Multiple listings describe assigned on-site parking, such as “1 assigned open parking stall,” “assigned parking,” and “parking stall conveniently located below the building,” indicating that resident parking is a consistent feature. MLS checkbox data aligns with the remarks, with all 20 listings showing a parking type and none indicating no parking. Evidence is strong and consistent across many different units and agents, confirming that the building offers parking.
Strong building-level evidence: MLS checkbox indicates assigned parking in 14 of 20 listings, and numerous remarks explicitly state 'assigned parking', 'assigned parking stall', or '1 assigned open parking' (appearing across many agent remarks rather than a single copy/paste). This consistent, explicit mentioning across listings supports including parking_assigned = true with high confidence.
No analysis available
Multiple remarks consistently describe 'assigned' parking stalls linked to units (e.g., 'assigned parking stall is directly below the unit', 'one assigned parking space' included in maintenance). However, the term 'deeded' is not explicitly used, so ownership-as-deed cannot be confirmed; retaining prior value with low confidence.
No analysis available
Searched for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking charge', or similar phrases. Remarks reference an assigned stall and note maintenance fees include water/sewer and one assigned parking space, but no separate parking fee amount is stated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Looked for 'parking waitlist' or 'waiting list' language. None found; listings consistently reference an assigned/open parking stall for the unit, indicating no stated waitlist system in the public remarks.
No analysis available
I searched for 'key card', 'fob', 'card access', 'card reader' and similar phrases and found no mentions. While the complex is described as gated and having a security guard, there is no evidence of card/fob electronic access.
Multiple listing remarks repeatedly describe the property as a gated/secured community; one remark explicitly states 'gated community with CCTV and Security Guard.' MLS checkbox SECGUA appears in 9 of 20 recent listings and many agent remarks independently reference 'gated,' 'secured,' or 'security guard,' indicating consistent, strong evidence across listings rather than a single copy-paste error.
The listings repeatedly state the complex has a security guard and CCTV and call it a gated, secured community. Although the term 'security patrol' or 'roving patrol' is not used, the presence of an on-site security guard and CCTV indicates active security presence, supporting a determination of security patrol/service with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building is concrete: 17/20 current MLS listings mark CONCRE and at least one MLS remark explicitly says 'fully concrete structure.' The concrete description appears across multiple agent listings and aligns with the high proportion of MLS checkboxes, supporting high confidence.
No analysis available
No public remarks reference 'hollow tile' despite 6/20 MLS checkboxes indicating HOLTIL. Because remarks (multiple agent entries) make no mention and there is no owner/site verification describing hollow-tile construction, there is insufficient evidence to include this feature—MLS checkbox prevalence may reflect agent copy/paste rather than true building construction.
Across roughly 20 listings for this building, only 2 show MASSTU in the construction materials while 18 do not, and no remarks reference masonry or stucco construction. There is also no mention of any recent structural renovation or recladding to masonry/stucco. Taken together, this strongly suggests the few MASSTU entries are MLS data entry errors rather than an accurate building-wide feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 'short-term rental', 'vacation rental', 'STR', '30-day minimum', 'NUC', or similar. No listings indicate STR permission or hotel/TVU arrangements, so STR is not supported by the public remarks.
Because short-term rentals are not referenced in the remarks, there is no basis for a hotel rental pool. No terms like 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel program', or 'managed by [hotel]' appear in the listings.
No listings reference a mandatory hotel rental pool or required participation. Given no STR/hotel pool presence in the remarks, mandatory pool participation is not applicable.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 'lease expires', 'land lease', 'leasehold', 'ground lease ends', or explicit years. No lease expiry year or renewal information appears in the public remarks.
Searched for phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', or 'VA loans accepted'. No listings reference VA loan approval or acceptance, so VA financing is not indicated in the public remarks.
Reviewed all remarks for indications the HOA provides full/walls-in building insurance (phrases such as 'fully insured' or 'walls-in coverage') and found none. With no explicit confirmation, this is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
Searched the public remarks for phrases like 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE passed', 'fire safety certified', and 'passed fire inspection' and found no references. In the absence of any explicit statement, this field is set to false with medium confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0/20) mention 'sunset', 'western exposure', 'evening sun', or similar; 4/20 listings explicitly set view to 'None'. The aggregated public remarks contain no references to sunset or western views across multiple agent listings, so there is strong, consistent evidence the building does not offer sunset views.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit statements like 'view fireworks', 'watch fireworks from', or 'lanai views of fireworks' and found none, so there's no evidence the building offers fireworks views from units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.