Su Casa
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Su Casa
Building Overview
Su Casa in Waipahu — concrete building (1968) with on-site security guard; parking available. Pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Su Casa
Su Casa is a residential building located in the Waipahu neighborhood. According to available records the building was constructed in 1968 and is of concrete construction. Specific unit sizes and total number of units are not provided in the MLS data.
Key features listed in the MLS include an on-site security guard. Building management details are unknown in the available data.
Parking is indicated as available. Pet ownership and short-term rentals are not allowed per the MLS information. Buyers should verify all building details, fees, policies and management information independently; this summary is based on MLS data available for Su Casa.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for owner-occupancy percentages and descriptions such as majority owner occupied or highly owner occupied. No relevant information was found, so the owner-occupancy percentage remains unknown.
The remarks include a direct reference to a "three story walk-up" and repeatedly describe ground-, second-, and top-floor access by stairs. No listing mentions elevators, so the current value of 0 is supported.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The current MLS data supports inclusion of common area electricity in 11 of 20 listings through the OTCOEX code. No public remarks explicitly state that common area electricity is included, so this appears moderately supported and may partly reflect copied MLS checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence strongly indicates hot water is not included in the maintenance fee. Fourteen of 20 listings list WTRHTR, and the remarks explicitly reference "a water heater," while HOTWAT appears in only 1 of 20 listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is strongly supported across the building, with SEWER checked in 17 of 20 listings. The explicit phrase "the low maintenance fee includes water, sewer" confirms the feature in public remarks.
Water inclusion is strongly supported, with WATER checked in 17 of 20 listings. A public remark directly confirms that the maintenance fee includes "water, sewer," providing corroboration beyond MLS checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit surfboard or board-storage facilities. No qualifying mention was found in the public remarks.
No analysis available
None of the 30 public remarks mention a trash chute or related system. The feature appears in only 1 of 20 MLS amenity records, with no corroboration from multiple listings or detailed remarks, so it is omitted as likely checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit saltwater-pool terminology. No such language was found, and the available context lists pool=false.
No analysis available
Community laundry is supported by all 20 of 20 current MLS listings through the COMLAU amenity field. One current remark explicitly states "Community Laundry," confirming shared laundry facilities; the strong historical record and consistent MLS data support including this building feature.
I searched for coin laundry, paid laundry, laundry fees, card-operated laundry, quarters, and coin-op language. No payment requirement was identified.
I searched for "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," and similar floor-by-floor wording. No qualifying mention was found, so this feature is not supported.
Strong evidence across multiple listings that the building offers parking: numerous remarks state “1 parking stall,” “assigned parking,” “assigned open parking,” or “parking directly behind the unit.” Historical MLS checkbox data also indicates parking present in all 20 listings. Evidence is consistent across different agents and listings.
Assigned parking is strongly supported across multiple listings and agents: at least 8 remarks explicitly use phrases such as 'assigned parking,' '1 assigned parking stall,' 'one assigned parking space,' or '1 assigned open parking.' Other listings describe parking directly behind, below, or belonging to the unit, consistent with the historical MLS evidence showing ASSIGN in 14 of 20 listings.
No analysis available
Multiple listings mention an assigned parking stall, including parking directly below or behind the unit. None state that the stall is deeded, owned, or included in the unit’s deed.
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for parking fees, monthly parking charges, rental charges, and additional parking costs. No specific parking fee was provided; one listing only states that the maintenance fee includes one assigned parking space.
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly mention gated or secured entry—phrases include “Gated building,” “gated and secure building,” “secured, gated community,” and “secured Su Casa community.” At least a dozen separate remarks reference gated/secure entry across the listings, indicating the building has secured entry for parking/common access.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings consistently describe assigned or open parking stalls. No remark mentions a parking waitlist, waiting list, or the need to join a list.
No analysis available
I searched for key card access, fob access, card readers, and keycard entry. Gated or secured entry alone does not establish a card-based security system.
Multiple listing remarks repeatedly describe the property as a gated/secured community; one remark explicitly states 'gated community with CCTV and Security Guard.' MLS checkbox SECGUA appears in 9 of 20 recent listings and many agent remarks independently reference 'gated,' 'secured,' or 'security guard,' indicating consistent, strong evidence across listings rather than a single copy-paste error.
The public remarks support the presence of a security guard and surveillance. No explicit patrol-service language was found, so security patrol is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction is supported by 17 of 20 current MLS listings. Multiple remarks explicitly state "Solid concrete construction" and "fully concrete structure," confirming that the MLS designation is not merely copied checkbox data.
No analysis available
No public remarks reference 'hollow tile' despite 6/20 MLS checkboxes indicating HOLTIL. Because remarks (multiple agent entries) make no mention and there is no owner/site verification describing hollow-tile construction, there is insufficient evidence to include this feature—MLS checkbox prevalence may reflect agent copy/paste rather than true building construction.
Masonry/stucco construction appears in 3 of 20 current MLS records, with no public remarks explicitly mentioning "masonry" or "stucco." The evidence is much weaker than for concrete, but the prior high-confidence assessment supports retaining the feature absent clear contradictory evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for short-term rental, STR, vacation rental, NUC, TVU, and related rental-permission language. No listing indicates that short-term rentals are allowed, so STR allowance is not supported by the remarks.
No remarks reference a hotel rental pool, hotel rental program, hotel management, or a branded hotel pool. Because STR allowance is not supported, hotel-pool participation must also be false.
The remarks contain no statement that units must participate in a hotel rental program or cannot opt out. Because STR allowance is not supported, mandatory hotel-pool participation must also be false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for leasehold, land lease, ground lease, lease expiration, and renewal language. No specific lease-expiry year or land-tenure information was found.
The remarks were searched for VA approval, VA financing, and VA loans accepted. No listing mentions VA loan approval or acceptance, so VA financing is not supported by the available remarks.
The remarks were searched for fully insured, full insurance, comprehensive building insurance, walls-in coverage, and equivalent wording. No insurance coverage information was found in the public remarks.
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for fire/life safety evaluation results, FLSE, fire safety certification, passed fire inspections, and life-safety compliance. No such statements were found, so there is no public-remark evidence that the building passed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings mention sunset views, western exposure, evening sun, or related phrases. Eighteen of 20 listings explicitly report the view as 'None,' and the remaining remarks also omit sunset-related features, providing strong multi-listing evidence that the building does not offer sunset views.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit fireworks-view language, including viewing fireworks from a unit, lanai, or the building. No qualifying mention was found.
No analysis available
1 of the provided listings explicitly mentions an "On-site building manager," while current MLS amenities show RESMAN in 4/20 listings. The evidence supports a resident manager, though the limited number of detailed remarks means it is not confirmed consistently across multiple agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.