Su Casa
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Su Casa
Building Overview
Su Casa in Waipahu — concrete building (1968) with on-site security guard; parking available. Pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Su Casa
Su Casa is a residential building located in the Waipahu neighborhood. According to available records the building was constructed in 1968 and is of concrete construction. Specific unit sizes and total number of units are not provided in the MLS data.
Key features listed in the MLS include an on-site security guard. Building management details are unknown in the available data.
Parking is indicated as available. Pet ownership and short-term rentals are not allowed per the MLS information. Buyers should verify all building details, fees, policies and management information independently; this summary is based on MLS data available for Su Casa.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for owner-occupancy percentages and descriptions such as majority owner occupied or highly owner occupied. No owner-occupancy information was found, so the percentage is unknown.
Multiple listings characterize the property as a three-story walk-up, with no mention of elevators. This is consistent with the current value of zero elevators.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The current MLS data supports inclusion of common area electricity in 11 of 20 listings through the OTCOEX code. No public remarks explicitly state that common area electricity is included, so this appears moderately supported and may partly reflect copied MLS checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence strongly indicates hot water is not included in the maintenance fee. Fourteen of 20 listings list WTRHTR, and the remarks explicitly reference "a water heater," while HOTWAT appears in only 1 of 20 listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is strongly supported across the building, with SEWER checked in 17 of 20 listings. The explicit phrase "the low maintenance fee includes water, sewer" confirms the feature in public remarks.
Water inclusion is strongly supported, with WATER checked in 17 of 20 listings. A public remark directly confirms that the maintenance fee includes "water, sewer," providing corroboration beyond MLS checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings discuss assigned parking, community laundry, and general unit features. No qualifying reference to facilities for storing surfboards or boards was found.
No analysis available
None of the 30 public remarks mention a trash chute or related system. The feature appears in only 1 of 20 MLS amenity records, with no corroboration from multiple listings or detailed remarks, so it is omitted as likely checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks do not mention a swimming pool or describe one as salt water, saltwater, saline, or a salt pool. The building context lists pool=false, but public remarks provide no independent confirmation.
No analysis available
Community laundry is supported by all 20 of 20 current MLS listings through the COMLAU amenity field. One current remark explicitly states "Community Laundry," confirming shared laundry facilities; the strong historical record and consistent MLS data support including this building feature.
The listings do not establish that the community laundry requires payment. No references to coins, quarters, laundry fees, cards, or coin-op machines were found.
The listings include a generic reference to community laundry only. No qualifying language such as laundry on each floor, a laundry room on every floor, or floor-by-floor laundry was found.
Strong evidence across multiple listings that the building offers parking: numerous remarks state “1 parking stall,” “assigned parking,” “assigned open parking,” or “parking directly behind the unit.” Historical MLS checkbox data also indicates parking present in all 20 listings. Evidence is consistent across different agents and listings.
Assigned parking is strongly supported across multiple listings and agents: at least 8 remarks explicitly use phrases such as 'assigned parking,' '1 assigned parking stall,' 'one assigned parking space,' or '1 assigned open parking.' Other listings describe parking directly behind, below, or belonging to the unit, consistent with the historical MLS evidence showing ASSIGN in 14 of 20 listings.
No analysis available
Several listings mention an assigned parking stall, including parking directly below or behind the unit. However, assigned parking alone does not establish deeded ownership, and no deeded-parking language was found.
No analysis available
The listings discuss assigned parking and generally describe it as included with the unit or covered by maintenance fees. No specific monthly parking charge or additional parking cost appears in the remarks.
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly mention gated or secured entry—phrases include “Gated building,” “gated and secure building,” “secured, gated community,” and “secured Su Casa community.” At least a dozen separate remarks reference gated/secure entry across the listings, indicating the building has secured entry for parking/common access.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings consistently refer to assigned or open parking stalls. The remarks contain no indication that parking is subject to a waitlist.
No analysis available
Multiple listings confirm general secured or gated access. No evidence establishes a card- or fob-based security system, so this feature is not confirmed.
Multiple listing remarks repeatedly describe the property as a gated/secured community; one remark explicitly states 'gated community with CCTV and Security Guard.' MLS checkbox SECGUA appears in 9 of 20 recent listings and many agent remarks independently reference 'gated,' 'secured,' or 'security guard,' indicating consistent, strong evidence across listings rather than a single copy-paste error.
The listings support the presence of a security guard and surveillance, consistent with the building context. However, no qualifying reference to patrol service was found.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction is supported by 17 of 20 current MLS listings. Multiple remarks explicitly state "Solid concrete construction" and "fully concrete structure," confirming that the MLS designation is not merely copied checkbox data.
No analysis available
No public remarks reference 'hollow tile' despite 6/20 MLS checkboxes indicating HOLTIL. Because remarks (multiple agent entries) make no mention and there is no owner/site verification describing hollow-tile construction, there is insufficient evidence to include this feature—MLS checkbox prevalence may reflect agent copy/paste rather than true building construction.
Masonry/stucco construction appears in 3 of 20 current MLS records, with no public remarks explicitly mentioning "masonry" or "stucco." The evidence is much weaker than for concrete, but the prior high-confidence assessment supports retaining the feature absent clear contradictory evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks describe the units as suitable for homeowners and long-term investors but do not state that short-term rentals are permitted. Because no supporting STR language appears, short-term-rental allowance is not supported.
The remarks contain no references to a hotel rental pool, hotel management, Hilton/Trump/Ritz participation, or similar program. Since short-term rental permission is not established, hotel-pool participation is false.
The listings do not state that owners must participate in a rental pool or cannot opt out. The prerequisite STR allowance is also absent, so mandatory hotel-pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks do not identify the property as leasehold or provide a ground-lease expiration date. No four-digit lease-expiry year or renewal date could be extracted.
The remarks were searched for references to VA-approved status and VA loan eligibility. None were found, so VA financing is not supported by the available public remarks.
The remarks were searched for fully insured, full insurance, comprehensive building insurance, walls-in coverage, and equivalent wording. No insurance information was provided, so full HOA insurance cannot be confirmed.
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for fire/life safety evaluation results, FLSE passage, fire safety certification, life-safety compliance, and passed fire inspections. None of these were mentioned, so there is no evidence that the building has passed an FLSE.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings mention sunset views, western exposure, evening sun, or related phrases. Eighteen of 20 listings explicitly report the view as 'None,' and the remaining remarks also omit sunset-related features, providing strong multi-listing evidence that the building does not offer sunset views.
No analysis available
The listings focus on Waipahu location, transportation, shopping, and nearby amenities. No qualifying language describing fireworks views from a unit, lanai, or the building was found.
No analysis available
1 of the provided listings explicitly mentions an "On-site building manager," while current MLS amenities show RESMAN in 4/20 listings. The evidence supports a resident manager, though the limited number of detailed remarks means it is not confirmed consistently across multiple agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.