Su Casa
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Su Casa
Building Overview
Su Casa in Waipahu — concrete building (1968) with on-site security guard; parking available. Pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Su Casa
Su Casa is a residential building located in the Waipahu neighborhood. According to available records the building was constructed in 1968 and is of concrete construction. Specific unit sizes and total number of units are not provided in the MLS data.
Key features listed in the MLS include an on-site security guard. Building management details are unknown in the available data.
Parking is indicated as available. Pet ownership and short-term rentals are not allowed per the MLS information. Buyers should verify all building details, fees, policies and management information independently; this summary is based on MLS data available for Su Casa.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit owner-occupancy indicators (e.g., '80% owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied', 'highly owner occupied') and found none. Because there is no current numeric value and no remarks to infer a percentage, the owner_occupancy is unknown (null) with low confidence.
Multiple listings describe the property as a 'three story walk-up' and reference stairways and top-floor units, which strongly indicates there are no elevators in the building. Based on those explicit remarks and the existing current value of 0, I retain 0 elevators with high confidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
11 of 20 current MLS listings have OTCOEX (common area electric) checked, but public remarks do not explicitly state 'common area electricity' or 'building power included.' The evidence is primarily from MLS checkboxes across multiple listings (possible agent copy/paste), so inclusion is implied rather than directly confirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence hot water is not included: 13/20 listings list WTRHTR (water heater) in inclusions and the public remarks here state the unit has a 'water heater.' Only 1/20 listings had HOTWAT checked, so building-level hot water-included is unsupported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong and consistent evidence sewer is included: 17 of 20 listings have SEWER checked in association_fee_includes and the public remarks explicitly state 'low maintenance fee includes ... sewer,' confirming building-level inclusion across multiple agents/listings.
Clear evidence water is included in the maintenance fee: 17 of 20 listings have WATER checked in MLS and the public remarks for this property explicitly state 'low maintenance fee includes water,' indicating strong, consistent confirmation across listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for terms like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', and related phrases and found none. There is no evidence of designated surfboard storage in the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks contain no references to a pool, and building context lists pool=False. I searched for 'salt water pool', 'saltwater', 'saline pool' and found nothing.
No analysis available
All 20 of 20 current MLS listings for this building include COMLAU in the amenities and the public remarks explicitly state "Community Laundry. On-site building manager." The mention appears consistently across listings (likely copy-pasted by agents) and directly confirms a building-level shared laundry room, so confidence is high.
Listings reference 'Community Laundry' but do not specify whether machines are coin-operated, card-operated, or free. I searched for terms like 'coin', 'card', 'paid', 'coin-op', and related phrases and found nothing.
Public remarks explicitly state 'Community Laundry' but contain no language indicating laundry is available on every floor. I searched for phrases such as 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and 'floor-by-floor laundry' and found none.
Strong evidence across multiple listings that the building offers parking: numerous remarks state “1 parking stall,” “assigned parking,” “assigned open parking,” or “parking directly behind the unit.” Historical MLS checkbox data also indicates parking present in all 20 listings. Evidence is consistent across different agents and listings.
Strong building-level evidence: MLS checkbox indicates assigned parking in 14 of 20 listings, and numerous remarks explicitly state 'assigned parking', 'assigned parking stall', or '1 assigned open parking' (appearing across many agent remarks rather than a single copy/paste). This consistent, explicit mentioning across listings supports including parking_assigned = true with high confidence.
No analysis available
I searched for wording such as 'deeded parking', 'owned parking', or 'parking included in deed'. Listings repeatedly say 'assigned parking stall' or 'assigned open parking,' which indicates reserved parking but does not indicate deeded ownership.
No analysis available
Searched for explicit 'parking fee', 'monthly parking charge', or similar phrases. The remarks note 'low maintenance fee includes water, sewer, and one assigned parking space' but do not state a separate monthly parking fee, so a parking fee amount is not available from the remarks.
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly mention gated or secured entry—phrases include “Gated building,” “gated and secure building,” “secured, gated community,” and “secured Su Casa community.” At least a dozen separate remarks reference gated/secure entry across the listings, indicating the building has secured entry for parking/common access.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 'parking waitlist' or similar language. Listings consistently reference an assigned stall and do not mention any waiting list system, so there is no evidence of a parking waitlist in the public remarks.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like 'key card access', 'fob access', or 'card reader' and found none. While the complex is described as gated and secured with a security guard and CCTV, there is no evidence of card/fob access in the remarks.
Multiple listing remarks repeatedly describe the property as a gated/secured community; one remark explicitly states 'gated community with CCTV and Security Guard.' MLS checkbox SECGUA appears in 9 of 20 recent listings and many agent remarks independently reference 'gated,' 'secured,' or 'security guard,' indicating consistent, strong evidence across listings rather than a single copy-paste error.
Public remarks explicitly reference security presence ('Security Guard', 'CCTV') and multiple listings call the complex gated and secured. This supports that there is an active security/patrol presence or on-site security.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
High confidence that the building is concrete: 17 of 20 current MLS listings mark CONCRE and at least one agent remark explicitly states "fully concrete structure." The explicit phrase in the public remarks aligns with the strong historical checkbox prevalence, suggesting the building is constructed of concrete across multiple listings rather than a one-off error.
No analysis available
No public remarks reference 'hollow tile' despite 6/20 MLS checkboxes indicating HOLTIL. Because remarks (multiple agent entries) make no mention and there is no owner/site verification describing hollow-tile construction, there is insufficient evidence to include this feature—MLS checkbox prevalence may reflect agent copy/paste rather than true building construction.
Across roughly 20 listings for this building, only 2 show MASSTU in the construction materials while 18 do not, and no remarks reference masonry or stucco construction. There is also no mention of any recent structural renovation or recladding to masonry/stucco. Taken together, this strongly suggests the few MASSTU entries are MLS data entry errors rather than an accurate building-wide feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for terms indicating short-term rental permission or hotel/TVU programs. The public remarks contain no indication that STRs are allowed, so based solely on the remarks STRs are not shown as permitted.
Looked for 'hotel rental pool' or hotel management language; found none. Because there is no evidence STRs are allowed, there is no basis in the remarks to indicate participation in a hotel rental pool.
Searched for phrases like 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or 'must be in rental program' and found none. Given no evidence of STR or hotel pool programs, there is no indication of any mandatory pool participation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for terms like 'lease expires', 'land lease', 'leasehold', and explicit years (e.g., 2050). The remarks contain no leasehold or lease-expiry information, so the lease expiry year cannot be determined from these remarks.
Searched the remarks for phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', or 'VA loans accepted'. No listings reference VA loan approval or acceptance, so there is no evidence the building is VA-approved in the public remarks.
I reviewed the public remarks for indications the HOA provides full/walls-in building insurance (e.g., 'fully insured', 'walls-in coverage', 'comprehensive building insurance') and found no such statements. With no explicit mention, set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for phrases such as 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE passed', 'fire safety certified', 'passed fire inspection', and related language but found no references. In the absence of any remarks, the field is set to false with medium confidence (absence of mention is common for this data).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0/20) mention sunset or western exposure and 4/20 listings explicitly list the view as 'None'. Public remarks repeatedly describe breezes and natural light but contain no phrases like 'sunset view', 'western exposure', or 'evening sun'. Evidence is consistent across multiple agents and appears to reflect the building does not offer sunset views.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit statements such as 'view fireworks', 'watch fireworks from lanai', or 'see fireworks from unit' and found none. There is no evidence in the remarks that units have fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.