Su Casa
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Su Casa
Building Overview
Su Casa in Waipahu — concrete building (1968) with on-site security guard; parking available. Pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Su Casa
Su Casa is a residential building located in the Waipahu neighborhood. According to available records the building was constructed in 1968 and is of concrete construction. Specific unit sizes and total number of units are not provided in the MLS data.
Key features listed in the MLS include an on-site security guard. Building management details are unknown in the available data.
Parking is indicated as available. Pet ownership and short-term rentals are not allowed per the MLS information. Buyers should verify all building details, fees, policies and management information independently; this summary is based on MLS data available for Su Casa.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The listing floor fields, county parcel record, and state registration all support 3 floors. The unit-number-derived values were set aside because they disagree with the MLS floor fields in this low-rise building.
The county parcel record and the state registration independently report 192 residential units, and the parcel and registration each cover this single building.
Owner occupancy from AOUO registration(s) 2170. Refreshed by Real_Estate_Scraper/reb_registry/propagate_owner_occupancy.py, which this lock does not block.
The three-story walk-up description supports a building without elevators and is consistent with the current value of 0. No remarks indicate any elevator installation or elevator service.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Thirteen of 20 listings list OTCOEX, the MLS code associated with common-area electricity. No listing remarks explicitly says that common electricity or building power is included, so the evidence is primarily checkbox-based and may partly reflect copied MLS data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only one of 20 listings includes HOTWAT, compared with 16 of 20 listing WTRHTR. Public remarks also refer to individual water heaters, supporting the conclusion that hot water is unit-supplied rather than included in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Eighteen of 20 listings identify sewer as included in the association fee. The explicit remark confirming that the low maintenance fee includes sewer, together with consistent MLS data across many listings, provides strong building-level evidence.
Eighteen of 20 listings identify water as included in the association fee. A listing directly states that the low maintenance fee includes water, and the same inclusion is consistently reported across multiple listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings mention assigned parking, community laundry, and general unit features, but no dedicated surfboard-storage facility. Surfboard storage is therefore not established.
No analysis available
None of the 30 public remarks mention a trash chute or related system. The feature appears in only 1 of 20 MLS amenity records, with no corroboration from multiple listings or detailed remarks, so it is omitted as likely checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings do not describe a swimming pool or any saltwater pool terminology. The current building context also indicates that the property has no pool.
No analysis available
Community laundry is strongly supported: 20/20 current listings include the COMLAU amenity, and one listing explicitly states "Community Laundry." The consistent MLS reporting and explicit remark support a shared building laundry facility rather than in-unit laundry.
Community laundry is referenced in one listing, but there is no evidence that residents must pay to use it. Payment-based laundry cannot be confirmed.
The listings confirm community laundry generally, but no qualifying phrases such as laundry on each floor, laundry room on every floor, or floor-by-floor laundry were found. Therefore, every-floor laundry is not established.
Parking is consistently documented across all 20 listings through MLS data, with many remarks explicitly mentioning assigned, open, or below-building parking. The evidence is strong across multiple listings and agents, not dependent on a single copied remark.
Assigned parking is strongly supported across multiple listings and agents: at least 8 remarks explicitly use phrases such as 'assigned parking,' '1 assigned parking stall,' 'one assigned parking space,' or '1 assigned open parking.' Other listings describe parking directly behind, below, or belonging to the unit, consistent with the historical MLS evidence showing ASSIGN in 14 of 20 listings.
No analysis available
Multiple listings confirm assigned parking, including parking directly below or behind some units. Assigned parking does not establish deeded ownership, and no remark states that the stall is included in the deed.
No analysis available
The remarks mention assigned parking and indicate in one listing that the maintenance fee includes one assigned parking space. No specific monthly parking fee was found, so the exact fee amount is unknown.
No analysis available
More than 15 current remarks mention a gated, secured, or security-controlled building/community, and multiple listings specifically associate the parking location with the gated or secured entry. Although some remarks may use repeated community language, the repeated explicit descriptions and MLS SECENT entries provide strong evidence that parking access is secured.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings consistently describe assigned or open parking stalls. None mentions limited parking availability, a parking waiting list, or a waitlist enrollment process.
No analysis available
Controlled or secured access is documented, but the access method is not. No card- or fob-based security system was found in the remarks.
Multiple listing remarks repeatedly describe the property as a gated/secured community; one remark explicitly states 'gated community with CCTV and Security Guard.' MLS checkbox SECGUA appears in 9 of 20 recent listings and many agent remarks independently reference 'gated,' 'secured,' or 'security guard,' indicating consistent, strong evidence across listings rather than a single copy-paste error.
The listings support the presence of security personnel and surveillance. They do not establish that the property has a security patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction is strongly supported by 17 of 20 current listings. Multiple independent remarks explicitly describe the building as having "solid concrete construction" or being a "fully concrete structure," confirming that the MLS data is not merely copy-pasted checkbox information.
No analysis available
No public remarks reference hollow tile construction across the listings. The feature appears in 7 of 20 MLS records, but this conflicts with the complete absence of supporting agent descriptions and the previously low confidence, so it should not be included as a validated building feature.
Masonry/stucco construction appears in 3 of 20 current MLS records, with no public remarks explicitly mentioning "masonry" or "stucco." The evidence is much weaker than for concrete, but the prior high-confidence assessment supports retaining the feature absent clear contradictory evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the supplied remarks mention above-ground construction or materials. Only 5 of 20 MLS listings contain the ABOGRO checkbox, with no corroborating descriptions, so this appears insufficiently supported and may reflect unverified MLS entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks discuss homeowners, first-time buyers, investors, and long-term tenants or current rents, but do not authorize short-term rentals. Therefore, STR permission is not supported by the public remarks.
The listings contain no reference to a hotel rental pool or managed hotel rental program. Because STR permission is not supported, hotel-pool participation must also be false.
The remarks do not state that owners must participate in a hotel rental pool or rental program. Since STR permission and hotel-pool participation are not supported, mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks do not identify the property as leasehold or provide a land-lease expiration date. No specific four-digit lease-expiry year or renewal year was found.
The remarks were searched for VA-approved status, VA financing, and VA loan eligibility. None of these references appear, so VA financing is not supported by the available public remarks.
The remarks were searched for full or comprehensive HOA insurance and walls-in coverage. No insurance information was provided, so full building insurance cannot be confirmed.
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for fire/life safety evaluation results, FLSE passage, fire safety certification, life-safety compliance, and passed fire inspection. Although some listings mention security features and a new smoke detector, none confirm that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the provided listings mention sunset views or related phrases such as “evening sun” or “western exposure.” The evidence is consistent across many listings and supports that sunset views are not an established building feature.
No analysis available
The listings focus on Waipahu location, transportation, shopping, and nearby amenities. No building or unit fireworks view was mentioned.
No analysis available
1 of the provided listings explicitly mentions an "On-site building manager," while current MLS amenities show RESMAN in 4/20 listings. The evidence supports a resident manager, though the limited number of detailed remarks means it is not confirmed consistently across multiple agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.