Spinnaker Place Townhome 2
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Spinnaker Place Townhome 2
Building Overview
Spinnaker Place Townhome 2 in Ewa, built 2006; concrete construction, no pets and no short-term rentals (based on MLS data).
About Spinnaker Place Townhome 2
Based on MLS data, Spinnaker Place Townhome 2 is located in the Ewa neighborhood and was built in 2006. The building is constructed of concrete. Size and unit count are not provided in the available MLS information.
According to available records, the property does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted. Management company information is listed as unknown in the MLS data. No additional amenity details are specified in the provided records.
Buyers should verify specifics such as floor plans, parking, homeowner association fees, and management contact directly, as this summary is based solely on the MLS data available and may be incomplete.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy language such as percentages ('80% owner occupied') or descriptions like 'majority owner occupied' or 'highly owner occupied.' The remarks do not mention owner occupancy, so this remains unknown from the listing text.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator references and general phrases like 'multiple elevators' but found none. Given this is a townhouse-style community and there is no remark evidence supporting elevators, I am treating the feature as not indicated in the listings.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
4 of 5 current listings list OTCOEX in association_fee_includes, implying maintenance likely covers common area electricity. None of the public remarks mention common electric explicitly, so the evidence is primarily checkbox-based across multiple agents and appears implied rather than directly stated in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0 of 5) list HOTWAT in association fee inclusions while all 5 list WTRHTR (water heater) in unit inclusions, strongly indicating hot water is provided by individual units and not included in HOA fees. Public remarks contain no statements about building-provided hot water, so the MLS inclusion/exclusion pattern is clear and consistent.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 1 of 5 current listings lists SEWER in association_fee_includes and none of the public remarks reference sewer being included in HOA fees. With no historical confirmation and minimal checkbox support, the single listing appears to be an outlier, so evidence suggests sewer is not reliably included.
Only 1 of 5 listings lists WATER in association_fee_includes while none of the public remarks state that water is included in HOA fees. Absent historical support and with minimal MLS checkbox evidence, the water-included claim appears unreliable and is omitted.
High confidence: public remarks explicitly say 'Enjoy cookouts in this pet friendly community.' Combined with the MLS trend (majority of current listings checked BBQ), evidence is strong across listings rather than a single agent copy/paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderate evidence: 3 of 5 current MLS listings have the clubhouse checkbox set, but none of the public remarks mention a 'clubhouse' or 'community center.' Included for buyers searching for a clubhouse, but confidence is moderate due to lack of descriptive remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox indicates patio/deck in 1 of 5 current listings, but 0 listings' public remarks mention 'patio', 'deck', 'lanai', or 'covered patio'. Evidence is weak and may be agent checkbox error, so the feature is included only with low confidence.
Good evidence: public remarks explicitly say 'take a lap around the walking paths' and reference walking paths in the community. Combined with MLS checkboxes indicating this amenity in multiple listings, include the jogging/walking path feature.
No analysis available
2 of the provided listings explicitly reference private outdoor space: quotes include 'Step outside to your own private yard' and 'Nicely manicured backyard'. MLS also flags PRIYAR on 2/5 listings. Multiple agents' remarks confirm private yard access for some units, so include with high confidence.
No analysis available
Low evidence: only 1 of 5 current MLS listings checks a recreation area and none of the public remarks mention 'recreation area,' 'recreation deck,' or 'amenity deck.' Given lack of corroborating remarks, omit this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence that some units offer storage: 2 of 5 public remarks explicitly state garage storage (phrases: "attached 2-car garage for secure parking and extra storage," "providing plenty of storage space"). Additionally, 1/5 listings includes STORAG in unit_features while building-level STORAG/ADDLVSTORAG is unchecked across listings. This suggests storage is available at the unit/garage level rather than as dedicated building lockers; evidence is moderate and appears across multiple listings rather than a single copy/paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All current MLS listings (5/5) have the pool amenity checked, and at least two public remarks explicitly reference a community pool — quoting "cool off at the community pool" and "short walk to the pool." Evidence is consistent across multiple listings/agents and aligns with prior high-confidence MLS data, indicating the building offers a shared pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 5 current MLS listings include 'WASHER/DRYER' in the inclusions, but 0/5 public remarks mention 'washer/dryer' or 'in-unit laundry'. Historical confidence was Medium and the MLS checkbox remains checked across listings, so the building is reported to offer in‑unit laundry but the lack of explicit remarks indicates this is likely agent-provided/inferred information rather than confirmed by remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across listings: multiple remarks explicitly mention a garage ('two car garage', '2 car garage', 'attached 2-car garage') in at least four/five listing remarks. Historical MLS data showed high confidence for covered parking and current remarks consistently confirm it, indicating building-level covered parking is present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderate evidence: 4 of 5 current MLS listings have the guest-parking checkbox checked and one public remark explicitly states 'Unit has ample guest parking.' Evidence is somewhat limited to MLS flags and a single explicit remark, so confidence is moderate rather than high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings' public remarks mention security guard service (search terms like 'security guard', '24-hour security', 'on-site security' are absent). MLS amenities show SECGUA in 1 of 4 listings, suggesting an isolated checkbox rather than a building-wide feature; evidence is weak and inconsistent across agents, so security guard is likely not a reliable building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building offers central air: 2 separate public remarks state it (quotes: 'Unit has ample... and central AC.'; 'Enjoy central AC year round...'). Multiple MLS records also have ACCEN/CENAC checked across listings, and the confirmation appears across different remarks rather than a single isolated entry, supporting inclusion of central_ac as true.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Two of four current MLS listings include 'CONCRE' in construction materials indicating concrete construction. None of the public remarks explicitly describe construction (no phrases like 'concrete building' or 'reinforced concrete'), so evidence comes solely from MLS checkboxes and appears inconsistent across agents.
Four of five current MLS records include DOUWAL indicating double-wall construction; however, none of the public remarks explicitly state 'double wall' or similar. Given the medium historical confidence and strong presence across listings (multiple agents listing DOUWAL), the evidence moderately supports including double-wall construction for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS shows STEFRA in 3 of 5 current listings, but none of the public remarks mention 'steel frame' or similar phrasing. Historical data provided no prior confidence for this feature, and there is no owner/site verification or explicit remark describing steel construction, so the likelihood this is a true building-level feature is low.
Two of four MLS records list 'SLAB' indicating a concrete slab foundation for at least some units. The public remarks for the listings do not mention 'concrete slab' or foundation details, so the assertion relies on MLS checkbox data and carries moderate confidence.
No analysis available
None of the three listing remarks mention wood frame construction (search for 'wood frame' returns no hits). MLS property data shows WOOFRA checked in 1 of 3 listings but no supporting agent remarks; with no historical confidence and sparse MLS checks this appears to be an agent entry inconsistency rather than a confirmed building feature.
Two of four MLS listings indicate 'ABOGRO' (above ground) in construction materials. Public remarks across listings do not mention above-ground construction; the evidence is limited to MLS checkboxes and thus moderate but not strong.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for insurance-related statements indicating full HOA or walls-in coverage, but found nothing. Without explicit wording in the listings, this feature cannot be confirmed from the available remarks.
No analysis available
I looked for language such as 'fire life safety evaluation passed,' 'FLSE passed,' 'fire safety certified,' and 'passed fire inspection,' but there were no such mentions. There is no public-remarks evidence to confirm this feature.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Historically the building was recorded as having sunset views (high confidence). Current remarks and listings do not describe sunset or western exposure (0 of 5 listings mention sunset; 4 of 5 show View=NONE), suggesting agents may have omitted the detail or copy/pasted view data. Given the prior high-confidence designation and lack of overwhelming, detailed counter-evidence, the building is marked as offering sunset views with moderate confidence (0.75).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.