Spinnaker Place Townhome 2
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Spinnaker Place Townhome 2
Building Overview
Spinnaker Place Townhome 2 in Ewa, built 2006; concrete construction, no pets and no short-term rentals (based on MLS data).
About Spinnaker Place Townhome 2
Based on MLS data, Spinnaker Place Townhome 2 is located in the Ewa neighborhood and was built in 2006. The building is constructed of concrete. Size and unit count are not provided in the available MLS information.
According to available records, the property does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted. Management company information is listed as unknown in the MLS data. No additional amenity details are specified in the provided records.
Buyers should verify specifics such as floor plans, parking, homeowner association fees, and management contact directly, as this summary is based solely on the MLS data available and may be incomplete.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy references like a percentage, 'majority owner occupied,' or 'highly owner occupied,' and found none. The remarks do not provide any data about the share of owner-occupied units in the building.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator language such as 'elevators,' 'multiple elevators,' or a count like '4 elevators,' and found nothing. The listings describe townhouse features, parking, and community amenities, but do not mention building elevators.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
4 of 5 current listings list OTCOEX in association_fee_includes, implying maintenance likely covers common area electricity. None of the public remarks mention common electric explicitly, so the evidence is primarily checkbox-based across multiple agents and appears implied rather than directly stated in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0 of 5) list HOTWAT in association fee inclusions while all 5 list WTRHTR (water heater) in unit inclusions, strongly indicating hot water is provided by individual units and not included in HOA fees. Public remarks contain no statements about building-provided hot water, so the MLS inclusion/exclusion pattern is clear and consistent.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 1 of 5 current listings lists SEWER in association_fee_includes and none of the public remarks reference sewer being included in HOA fees. With no historical confirmation and minimal checkbox support, the single listing appears to be an outlier, so evidence suggests sewer is not reliably included.
Only 1 of 5 listings lists WATER in association_fee_includes while none of the public remarks state that water is included in HOA fees. Absent historical support and with minimal MLS checkbox evidence, the water-included claim appears unreliable and is omitted.
High confidence: public remarks explicitly say 'Enjoy cookouts in this pet friendly community.' Combined with the MLS trend (majority of current listings checked BBQ), evidence is strong across listings rather than a single agent copy/paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderate evidence: 3 of 5 current MLS listings have the clubhouse checkbox set, but none of the public remarks mention a 'clubhouse' or 'community center.' Included for buyers searching for a clubhouse, but confidence is moderate due to lack of descriptive remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is some support for patio/deck-style outdoor space in this building, but it is not consistently described across listings. 1 of 6 public remarks explicitly says "front lanai" and mentions a backyard/outdoor living, while the MLS amenities checkbox appears in 2 of 6 current listings. Overall, the evidence is moderate and suggests outdoor space is available in at least some units rather than being a universally advertised building amenity.
Good evidence: public remarks explicitly say 'take a lap around the walking paths' and reference walking paths in the community. Combined with MLS checkboxes indicating this amenity in multiple listings, include the jogging/walking path feature.
No analysis available
2 of the provided listings explicitly reference private outdoor space: quotes include 'Step outside to your own private yard' and 'Nicely manicured backyard'. MLS also flags PRIYAR on 2/5 listings. Multiple agents' remarks confirm private yard access for some units, so include with high confidence.
No analysis available
Low evidence: only 1 of 5 current MLS listings checks a recreation area and none of the public remarks mention 'recreation area,' 'recreation deck,' or 'amenity deck.' Given lack of corroborating remarks, omit this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence that some units offer storage: 2 of 5 public remarks explicitly state garage storage (phrases: "attached 2-car garage for secure parking and extra storage," "providing plenty of storage space"). Additionally, 1/5 listings includes STORAG in unit_features while building-level STORAG/ADDLVSTORAG is unchecked across listings. This suggests storage is available at the unit/garage level rather than as dedicated building lockers; evidence is moderate and appears across multiple listings rather than a single copy/paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The pool amenity is well-supported: 2 of the current public remarks explicitly reference it, including phrases like "cool off at the community pool" and "short walk to the pool." Combined with the fact that all current MLS listings have the pool amenity checked, this appears to be a consistent building-level feature rather than a one-off agent error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 6 current MLS listings include "WASHER/DRYER" in the inclusions, while the public remarks do not explicitly call out laundry. Because this is consistent across multiple listings, it strongly suggests the building offers in-unit laundry rather than being a copy-paste mistake.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across the listings that parking is assigned: several remarks say “attached 2-car garage,” “2-car garage,” or “dedicated 2-car garage.” This appears repeatedly across multiple agents and is consistent with building-level parking for the unit.
Very strong evidence for covered parking. At least five listings explicitly mention a garage, including phrases like “2-car garage,” “attached 2-car garage,” and “garage with EV charger capability,” making this a consistent building feature across remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Guest parking is supported by both the current MLS checkbox data and public remarks. One listing directly says “Guest parking is nearby,” and the feature appears in 5 of 6 current MLS records, suggesting it is a real community amenity rather than a one-off agent error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings' public remarks mention security guard service (search terms like 'security guard', '24-hour security', 'on-site security' are absent). MLS amenities show SECGUA in 1 of 4 listings, suggesting an isolated checkbox rather than a building-wide feature; evidence is weak and inconsistent across agents, so security guard is likely not a reliable building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence for central AC. At least 2 of the provided remarks explicitly mention it, including phrases like 'central AC' and 'Enjoy central AC year round,' which confirms the earlier high-confidence MLS signals. This appears consistent across multiple listings rather than a one-off agent error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Three of six current listings include CONCRE in construction materials, which is moderate evidence that the building uses concrete construction in at least some form. None of the public remarks explicitly describe the structure as concrete, so this appears to be MLS coding rather than repeated marketing language.
Five of six current MLS records include DOUWAL, which is strong building-level evidence for double-wall construction. Public remarks do not spell this out, but the repeated MLS coding across listings suggests this is a real and commonly applied construction attribute for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Four of six current listings list STEFRA in construction materials, making steel frame construction one of the more consistently reported attributes in the MLS data. The public remarks are silent on construction type, so this looks like a repeated MLS entry rather than something agents are describing in remarks.
Two of four MLS records list 'SLAB' indicating a concrete slab foundation for at least some units. The public remarks for the listings do not mention 'concrete slab' or foundation details, so the assertion relies on MLS checkbox data and carries moderate confidence.
No analysis available
None of the three listing remarks mention wood frame construction (search for 'wood frame' returns no hits). MLS property data shows WOOFRA checked in 1 of 3 listings but no supporting agent remarks; with no historical confidence and sparse MLS checks this appears to be an agent entry inconsistency rather than a confirmed building feature.
Three of six listings currently carry ABOGRO in construction materials, which supports above-ground construction but not as strongly as the double-wall designation. The public remarks do not reference above-ground materials or construction, so this appears to be MLS-driven evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for insurance wording such as 'fully insured,' 'full insurance,' 'walls-in coverage,' or 'comprehensive building insurance,' and found no references. Nothing in the remarks indicates whether the HOA provides full building insurance.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like 'FLSE passed,' 'fire life safety evaluation passed,' 'fire safety certified,' or similar fire/life safety compliance statements and found none. The remarks focus on unit updates and neighborhood amenities, not building inspection or certification status.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Garden/landscaped views appear in some listings, but the evidence is modest. Across the provided remarks, 3 listings reference landscaped or manicured outdoor spaces, while the MLS view field is mixed (2/6 GARDEN, 4/6 NONE). This looks more like partial availability than a building-wide consistently advertised view feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Historically the building was recorded as having sunset views (high confidence). Current remarks and listings do not describe sunset or western exposure (0 of 5 listings mention sunset; 4 of 5 show View=NONE), suggesting agents may have omitted the detail or copy/pasted view data. Given the prior high-confidence designation and lack of overwhelming, detailed counter-evidence, the building is marked as offering sunset views with moderate confidence (0.75).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.