Spinnaker Place Townhome 1
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Spinnaker Place Townhome 1
Building Overview
Spinnaker Place Townhome 1 in Ewa — built 2005; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Spinnaker Place Townhome 1
Spinnaker Place Townhome 1 is located in the Ewa neighborhood and was built in 2005. According to available records, specific details about unit size and construction type are not provided in the MLS data for this building.
Based on MLS data, the building’s documented policies note that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The listing information does not include details about on-site amenities or community facilities.
Additional information such as parking arrangements, maintenance fees, homeowner association management, and other assessments is not specified in the available MLS records; the management company is listed as unknown. Prospective buyers should verify all building specifics, rules, and fees with the listing agent or association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common area electricity appears to be included in the maintenance fee. Current MLS data shows 19/20 listings with OTCOEX, and the remarks across many listings consistently reference maintained common areas and shared amenities rather than contradicting it. This looks like a stable building-level feature, not a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water does not appear to be included in the maintenance fee. Across the current listings, 0/20 mention HOTWAT, while many explicitly list WTRHTR, which is a strong sign the units rely on their own water heaters. Remarks are consistent with this pattern and provide no evidence of a building-paid hot water service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least two listings explicitly state sewer is managed through the association: 'Water and sewer are submetered through the association' and 'Other Fees Monthly includes sewer fees' (2+ listings). MLS checkbox data (6/19) and corroborating remarks from different listings provide strong evidence that sewer fees are included or administered by the HOA for some units.
There is solid support that water is included or handled through the association. Multiple remarks explicitly reference water being submetered through the association, and the MLS checkbox is present in 7 of 20 current listings. The phrasing is consistent across listings and does not look like a one-off copy-paste error.
BBQ/grilling facilities are strongly supported across the building’s listings and remarks. Multiple listings explicitly mention a "BBQ area" or "BBQ grilling area," often alongside the pool/recreation area, suggesting this is a shared community amenity rather than a one-off agent checkbox. The evidence is consistent across many remarks and appears to be repeatedly confirmed rather than copied incorrectly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (about 4-8 remarks) explicitly mention a clubhouse or recreation center ('access to a community pool and clubhouse', 'clubhouse, pool, and playground', 'recreation center', 'community association recreation area'). Mentions appear across different listings and agents, corroborating that a clubhouse/community center is available.
No analysis available
There are zero explicit mentions of a dog park/dog run in the public remarks; the listings repeatedly call the complex 'pet-friendly' but do not describe a dedicated dog exercise area. Given lack of remark evidence and only a few MLS checkbox entries, there is insufficient support to claim a building-level dog park.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence is strong across multiple listings: ~9 of 19 current listings reference patios/decks with phrases like 'Extended covered lanai: 18' 11" x 5'', 'covered patio', and 'front Lanai'. Mentions appear in separate agent remarks (not confined to one listing), indicating the building routinely offers patio/deck space rather than an isolated copy/paste error.
Several listings (about 3-6 remarks) explicitly mention neighborhood or on-site paths: 'tree-lined walking paths', 'walking and jogging paths', 'pathway right outside your front door'. These appear across multiple agent remarks, indicating the presence of walking/jogging paths in or immediately adjacent to the community.
No analysis available
Private yard space is clearly supported across many listings, with roughly 12 of 20 current listings showing the PRIYAR amenity and numerous remarks confirming it. Examples include "private, fully enclosed yard," "private outdoor patio," "private, fenced-in yard," "private backyard with artificial turf," and "courtyard-style yard." The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (around 5-8 remarks) explicitly mention 'hot tub', 'whirlpool', or 'jacuzzi' in addition to the pool (e.g., 'community amenities include a pool, hot tub, and BBQ area', 'pet friendly complex has a wonderful pool, jacuzzi, and recreation area', 'pool and recreation area... swim, hot tub, bbq'). These consistent references across different listings support that a whirlpool/hot tub is a building amenity.
Pool is strongly supported for this building. Multiple remarks explicitly mention a "swimming pool," "community pool," "association pool," "pool and BBQ area," and "pool, hot tub/jacuzzi, and recreation area," appearing across many listings from different agents rather than a single copied description.
There is weak evidence for a heated pool: only one current MLS record checks the heated-pool-related amenity, and none of the public remarks explicitly describe a heated or warm pool. The repeated pool references support a pool amenity generally, but not a clearly documented heated pool feature.
No analysis available
Multiple listings confirm the building offers laundry in some units, with explicit phrases like "in-unit laundry," "new washer and dryer," and "indoors." One remark notes "Laundry is in the garage," showing some unit layouts vary, but the building clearly offers in-unit laundry in a substantial number of homes. The evidence is consistent across several agents and matches the historically high MLS pattern.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is strongly confirmed across the listings. Multiple remarks mention a "2-car garage," "2-car driveway," "detached garage," "secure 2 car garage," and "four parking spaces," showing the building clearly offers parking. The evidence is consistent across many agents and appears to reflect actual building/unit parking availability rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
Covered parking is clearly present for this building. Multiple listings explicitly mention garage parking in different forms, including 'private 2-car garage,' '2-car enclosed garage,' 'detached garage,' and 'attached garage,' which strongly confirms the feature across many remarks. This appears consistent across listings rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
I looked for 'deeded parking,' 'owned stall,' 'parking included in deed,' and similar language. The remarks consistently mention parking spaces and garages, but they do not explicitly confirm that parking is deeded to the unit.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fees, paid stalls, monthly parking charges, and rental language. The remarks mention garages, driveways, and guest parking, but no separate parking cost is stated.
Guest parking is well supported by both MLS data and public remarks. Multiple listings explicitly state "guest parking available," "ample guest parking," and "lots of guest parking," indicating this is a shared building/community feature. The consistency across multiple agents makes this high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for 'parking waitlist,' 'waiting list,' and 'join waitlist for parking.' Nothing in the public remarks suggests a waitlist system for parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Security service appears to be a real community amenity, though it is not consistently called out in every listing. At least 2-3 remarks mention "community security" or list "security" alongside pool/BBQ/recreation amenities, which supports the MLS SECGUA flag. The evidence is moderate and looks more like intermittent agent omission than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Central AC is strongly supported across the listing set, with well over 10 remarks explicitly mentioning it and several using direct building/unit language such as "central AC throughout the home" and "equipped with central AC." The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents and listings, not just copy-paste checkbox data, so confidence is very high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no corroborating language in the public remarks for concrete construction, and the current MLS checkbox appears in a small minority of listings (4/20). This looks more like inconsistent MLS data than a confirmed building feature, so I am treating concrete construction as not supported.
17 of 19 current MLS listings include DOUWAL (double-wall) in construction_materials, and although none of the public remarks explicitly describe 'double wall' construction, the strong prevalence of the MLS checkbox across listings implies the building is likely double-wall constructed; evidence is moderately strong but not corroborated by agent remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Steel frame construction is present in the current MLS data for most listings (15/20), suggesting it is a real building characteristic rather than a one-off agent entry. The remarks do not spell it out, so the confidence is moderate rather than explicit, but the repeated MLS pattern across many listings supports inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
8 of 19 current MLS listings include ABOGRO (above ground) in construction_materials, but public remarks provide no mention of 'above ground' building or materials. Because this appears in fewer than half of MLS records and is not described in agent remarks, the indication is weak and treated as low-confidence MLS-only evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators such as STR allowed, vacation rental, NUC/TVU, and minimum-night rules, but found no evidence. Based on the remarks alone, there is no support for STR being allowed in this building.
I looked for references to hotel rental pools, brand pools, or hotel-managed operations and found none. Since the remarks do not show STR being allowed, a hotel pool arrangement is not supported.
I searched for terms like mandatory pool, required participation, cannot opt out, and similar wording. The remarks contain no evidence that any rental-pool participation is required, and there is no STR support either.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for phrases like 'lease expires,' 'ground lease,' 'leasehold expiring,' and any 4-digit expiration year, but found nothing. The listings do not provide any public evidence about land tenure or a lease expiry date.
The public remarks directly advertise VA assumable financing, which is strong evidence the building supports VA-related lending. This is an explicit listing statement rather than an inference.
No analysis available
Fire sprinklers are not supported by the public remarks: 0 of the provided listings explicitly mention sprinklers, sprinkler systems, or fire suppression. The only signal is a single MLS amenity checkbox out of 20 listings, which is weak and consistent with occasional agent data entry noise rather than a confirmed building-wide feature.
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the available listings, sunset views are not supported: 16 of 20 current MLS records explicitly show 'NONE' in view_descriptions, and only one record shows 'SUNSET'. Public remarks across many agents describe pool proximity, privacy, AC, yards, and parking, but do not mention sunset, western exposure, or evening light, suggesting the sunset entry is likely erroneous rather than a building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
7 of 19 current MLS listings include the RESMAN amenity box, but none of the public remarks explicitly say 'resident manager', 'on-site manager', or 'live-in manager'. One listing mentions proximity to the 'management office', which could imply on-site management, but overall the evidence is mixed and appears to be agent checkbox usage rather than clear remark confirmations.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.