Spinnaker Place Townhome 1
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Spinnaker Place Townhome 1
Building Overview
Spinnaker Place Townhome 1 in Ewa — built 2005; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Spinnaker Place Townhome 1
Spinnaker Place Townhome 1 is located in the Ewa neighborhood and was built in 2005. According to available records, specific details about unit size and construction type are not provided in the MLS data for this building.
Based on MLS data, the building’s documented policies note that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The listing information does not include details about on-site amenities or community facilities.
Additional information such as parking arrangements, maintenance fees, homeowner association management, and other assessments is not specified in the available MLS records; the management company is listed as unknown. Prospective buyers should verify all building specifics, rules, and fees with the listing agent or association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy references like a percentage, "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied." The remarks do not provide any owner-occupancy figure or descriptive statement, so this cannot be determined from the listings.
I searched the public remarks for direct elevator references such as a count (for example, "4 elevators"), "multiple elevators," or similar wording. None of the listings mention elevators, so there is no evidence to confirm the building has any.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common area electricity appears to be included in the maintenance fee. Current MLS data shows 19/20 listings with OTCOEX, and the remarks across many listings consistently reference maintained common areas and shared amenities rather than contradicting it. This looks like a stable building-level feature, not a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence indicates hot water is not included in the maintenance fee. Across the current listings, 0/20 mention HOTWAT while many explicitly list WTRHTR, and one remark specifically mentions a 'solar water heater,' which points to unit-owned water heating rather than association-provided hot water.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is solid support that sewer is included or managed through the association. Current data shows 7/20 listings with SEWER, and multiple independent remarks explicitly reference sewer fees or submetered sewer, which is stronger than a simple checkbox pattern and suggests real building-level inclusion.
Water appears to be included or handled through the association. Multiple remarks explicitly reference 'water' in the HOA context, including 'Water and sewer are submetered through the association' and 'estimated sub-metered water,' matching the current MLS pattern of 8/20 listings.
BBQ/grilling facilities are strongly supported across the building’s listings. Multiple remarks explicitly reference a 'BBQ grilling area' / 'BBQ area' / 'BarBQ area,' and the amenity appears consistently in both MLS data and agent descriptions rather than a one-off copy-paste mention.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (about 4-8 remarks) explicitly mention a clubhouse or recreation center ('access to a community pool and clubhouse', 'clubhouse, pool, and playground', 'recreation center', 'community association recreation area'). Mentions appear across different listings and agents, corroborating that a clubhouse/community center is available.
No analysis available
There are zero explicit mentions of a dog park/dog run in the public remarks; the listings repeatedly call the complex 'pet-friendly' but do not describe a dedicated dog exercise area. Given lack of remark evidence and only a few MLS checkbox entries, there is insufficient support to claim a building-level dog park.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence is strong across multiple listings: ~9 of 19 current listings reference patios/decks with phrases like 'Extended covered lanai: 18' 11" x 5'', 'covered patio', and 'front Lanai'. Mentions appear in separate agent remarks (not confined to one listing), indicating the building routinely offers patio/deck space rather than an isolated copy/paste error.
The building/community appears to offer walking/jogging paths, with several listings referencing 'tree-lined walking paths' and 'walking and jogging paths.' This is supported by both the current MLS amenity data and remarks, indicating the feature is real and searchable for buyers.
No analysis available
Private yard space is clearly supported across many listings, with roughly 12 of 20 current listings showing the PRIYAR amenity and numerous remarks confirming it. Examples include "private, fully enclosed yard," "private outdoor patio," "private, fenced-in yard," "private backyard with artificial turf," and "courtyard-style yard." The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (around 5-8 remarks) explicitly mention 'hot tub', 'whirlpool', or 'jacuzzi' in addition to the pool (e.g., 'community amenities include a pool, hot tub, and BBQ area', 'pet friendly complex has a wonderful pool, jacuzzi, and recreation area', 'pool and recreation area... swim, hot tub, bbq'). These consistent references across different listings support that a whirlpool/hot tub is a building amenity.
Pool is very strongly supported for this building. Multiple listings explicitly mention access to a 'community pool,' 'association pool,' 'swimming pool,' and nearby recreation areas with pool/hot tub/BBQ, coming from different remarks rather than a single copied phrase. The evidence is consistent across many listings and matches the historical MLS amenity data.
There is weak evidence for a heated pool: only one current MLS record checks the heated-pool-related amenity, and none of the public remarks explicitly describe a heated or warm pool. The repeated pool references support a pool amenity generally, but not a clearly documented heated pool feature.
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly mention "in-unit laundry," "washer and dryer in garage," "it's indoors," and "new washer and dryer," with several independent listings confirming the feature. Combined with the historical MLS signal (18/20 listings with washer/dryer in inclusions), this appears to be a stable building-level offering available in many units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is strongly confirmed across the listings. Multiple remarks mention a "2-car garage," "2-car driveway," "detached garage," "secure 2 car garage," and "four parking spaces," showing the building clearly offers parking. The evidence is consistent across many agents and appears to reflect actual building/unit parking availability rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
Covered parking is strongly confirmed for this building. Across the provided remarks, many listings explicitly mention a garage or enclosed garage, including phrases like "detached garage," "2-car garage," and "2-car enclosed garage." This appears consistent across multiple agents and is not just a copy-paste checkbox artifact.
I looked for explicit language like "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed," and did not find it. The listings do mention 2-car garages, driveways, and guest parking, but that is not enough to confirm deeded parking.
No analysis available
I searched for monthly parking charges, rental-stall language, or any additional parking cost, and found none. The remarks discuss garages and guest parking, but no parking fee is stated.
Guest parking is well supported by both MLS data and public remarks. Multiple listings explicitly state "guest parking available," "ample guest parking," and "lots of guest parking," indicating this is a shared building/community feature. The consistency across multiple agents makes this high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist or waiting list, and there were none. The listings instead describe available garages, driveways, guest parking, and even long-term guest stall rentals, which does not indicate a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Security service appears to be a real community amenity, though it is not consistently called out in every listing. At least 2-3 remarks mention "community security" or list "security" alongside pool/BBQ/recreation amenities, which supports the MLS SECGUA flag. The evidence is moderate and looks more like intermittent agent omission than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Central AC is strongly supported across the listing set, with well over 10 public remarks explicitly mentioning it. Multiple agents describe it directly in different ways—"central AC," "central air conditioning throughout," "newly upgraded central AC system," and "new central AC coil and handler"—which reinforces that the feature is real and consistently advertised. The current MLS data also aligns with the remarks, so confidence is very high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no corroborating language in the public remarks for concrete construction, and the current MLS checkbox appears in a small minority of listings (4/20). This looks more like inconsistent MLS data than a confirmed building feature, so I am treating concrete construction as not supported.
17 of 19 current MLS listings include DOUWAL (double-wall) in construction_materials, and although none of the public remarks explicitly describe 'double wall' construction, the strong prevalence of the MLS checkbox across listings implies the building is likely double-wall constructed; evidence is moderately strong but not corroborated by agent remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Steel frame construction appears consistently in the current MLS data for most listings (16 of 20). None of the public remarks explicitly mention a change away from steel frame, and there is no contrary evidence suggesting the MLS is incorrect. This is strong building-level evidence that buyers should see this as an available characteristic of the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
8 of 19 current MLS listings include ABOGRO (above ground) in construction_materials, but public remarks provide no mention of 'above ground' building or materials. Because this appears in fewer than half of MLS records and is not described in agent remarks, the indication is weak and treated as low-confidence MLS-only evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for public remarks suggesting short-term rental permission, including NUC/TVU terms, vacation rental language, or minimum-night rules, and found nothing. Based on the available remarks, there is no evidence that STR is allowed here.
I looked for hotel-pool references such as Hilton, Trump, Ritz, managed-by-hotel, or rental-pool wording, and found none. Since there is no evidence of STR being allowed, a hotel rental pool is not supported by these remarks.
I searched for phrases like mandatory pool, required participation, or cannot opt out, and found nothing. With no indication of short-term rental permission or a hotel program, there is no support for a mandatory pool arrangement.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold, ground lease, lease expiry, and any 4-digit expiration year, but found nothing. The remarks describe the homes, parking, and amenities, yet provide no land-tenure or lease-expiration information.
The remarks directly reference a VA loan opportunity, which is strong public evidence tied to financing in this building. I also noted the mortgage-program mention, but the VA assumable loan language is the clearest indicator.
I searched for HOA insurance language such as fully insured, full insurance, walls-in coverage, or comprehensive building insurance. None of the remarks include that kind of insurance wording, so full building insurance is not evidenced here.
Fire sprinklers are not supported by the public remarks: 0 of the provided listings explicitly mention sprinklers, sprinkler systems, or fire suppression. The only signal is a single MLS amenity checkbox out of 20 listings, which is weak and consistent with occasional agent data entry noise rather than a confirmed building-wide feature.
I looked for phrases like fire/life safety evaluation passed, FLSE, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection. The remarks do not mention any of these, so there is no public-remarks evidence that the building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views are not supported by the available listing remarks. Across the current MLS records, 16 of 20 explicitly show "NONE" in view_descriptions and only 1 shows "SUNSET," while none of the public remarks reference sunset, western exposure, or evening light. This looks like weak/possibly copy-paste MLS data rather than a real building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
7 of 19 current MLS listings include the RESMAN amenity box, but none of the public remarks explicitly say 'resident manager', 'on-site manager', or 'live-in manager'. One listing mentions proximity to the 'management office', which could imply on-site management, but overall the evidence is mixed and appears to be agent checkbox usage rather than clear remark confirmations.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.