Spinnaker
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Spinnaker
Building Overview
Spinnaker in Ewa (built 2006) — concrete/steel construction with pool, BBQ area, and central air.
About Spinnaker
Based on MLS data, Spinnaker is a condominium building located in the Ewa neighborhood, built in 2006. MLS records list the building construction as concrete with a steel frame. Size and unit count information are not provided in the available MLS data.
According to available records, building amenities include a pool and a BBQ area. Units are served by central air conditioning. No short-term rentals are permitted, and pets are not allowed per the provided MLS information.
Parking is listed as covered with guest parking available. The management company is not specified in the MLS data, and there is no fee schedule included in the provided records. Buyers should verify all details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or management, as this summary is based solely on MLS-derived data.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I reviewed the remarks for owner-occupancy clues, including explicit percentages or qualitative phrases like 'majority owner occupied' or 'highly owner occupied,' but found none. Without a stated percentage or clear ownership-occupancy description, the owner-occupancy rate remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator references such as a count ('4 elevators') or general wording like 'multiple elevators,' but found none. Since this is a townhouse community and the remarks consistently describe attached/detached garages and single- or two-story units, there is no evidence to support an elevator count.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common-area electricity appears to be included in the maintenance fee. Historical MLS data is strong at 16/20 listings showing OTCOEX, which suggests this is not just a one-off agent entry. Current remarks do not explicitly mention it, but the repeated MLS pattern supports keeping it true.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water does not appear to be included in the maintenance fee. The MLS pattern is very strong: 0/20 for HOTWAT and frequent WTRHTR entries, which is a strong negative indicator. Current remarks also do not describe any included hot-water service or building boiler system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is not included in the maintenance fee. One remark explicitly states there are 'additional fluctuating water and sewer fees,' which is direct evidence against inclusion. The historical MLS data is mixed, but the remarks are clear and consistent enough to keep this false.
Water is not included in the maintenance fee. At least one listing directly says there are 'additional fluctuating water and sewer fees,' which strongly indicates separate billing. The MLS checkbox data is inconsistent overall, but the explicit remark is more reliable here.
BBQ/grilling facilities are strongly supported across the building/community. Multiple listings mention "BBQ grills," "BBQ area," and "barbecue area," and the amenity appears consistently across many agent remarks rather than a one-off copy-paste. This aligns with the historical MLS data showing BBQ in 15/20 listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
A clubhouse/community center appears to be an available community amenity, though it is mentioned less often than BBQ. The remarks explicitly reference "clubhouse," "rec center," and "community center," which supports the MLS checkbox and suggests a shared building/community feature rather than a unit-specific attribute. Evidence is moderate-to-strong, but not as widespread as the BBQ references.
No analysis available
Three of 20 current MLS listings have the dog-park checkbox checked and at least one public remark explicitly states 'dog park'. Several other remarks call the community pet-friendly or reference yards suitable for pets, so there is moderate evidence the building/community offers a dog park or dedicated pet area.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence supports patio/deck-style outdoor space in this building. Multiple listings explicitly mention a 'front lanai,' 'covered lanai,' 'tiled outdoor living space,' and 'extended back lanai,' indicating the feature is repeatedly marketed by different agents rather than appearing as a one-off claim. Historical MLS data also shows 7/20 listings with PATDEC/COVPAT, reinforcing that this is a real building-level amenity.
Walking/jogging path amenities are clearly supported. Multiple listings describe “walking and jogging paths,” “scenic walking paths,” and similar wording, indicating a shared community feature rather than generic neighborhood sidewalks. The consistency across listings makes this a strong building-level amenity.
No analysis available
Private yard space is strongly supported across the remarks and MLS data. Many listings explicitly mention a 'private yard,' 'fenced yard,' 'private fenced backyard,' or 'gated yard,' often with details like turf, landscaping, or pet-friendly use. With 13/20 current listings carrying PRIYAR and repeated confirmation from multiple agents, this feature should be treated as present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The evidence does not clearly support a shared recreation room. One listing mentions a “recreation center,” but that is not the same as a recreation room/rec room, and most remarks instead reference pool, BBQ, cabana, clubhouse, or community center amenities. With only weak MLS support and no explicit recurring rec-room language, this feature is best treated as absent.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is supported across the building with multiple current remarks mentioning it directly. At least 3 listings in this set reference storage-related features such as "additional attic storage," "extra storage," and "garage shelving," matching the previously high-confidence MLS signals. The evidence appears consistent across different agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
I searched for surfboard storage language such as surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, or bike-and-surfboard storage. The remarks discuss nearby surf/water sports attractions, but they do not mention any dedicated surfboard storage facility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Whirlpool/hot tub/spa amenities are well supported. Listings explicitly mention “spa,” “jacuzzi,” “hot tub,” and “pool, spa” in the community amenity descriptions. This appears consistently across multiple remarks, so confidence is very high.
The building/community clearly has a pool. Public remarks mention it in roughly 20+ listings with phrases like "resort style amenities includes a pool," "community pool," "swimming pool," and "pool and jacuzzi." The evidence is strong and consistent across multiple agents, reinforcing the existing high-confidence MLS history.
No analysis available
I looked for salt-water pool wording such as saltwater pool, salt pool, or saline pool. The remarks repeatedly mention a pool, jacuzzi, hot tub, and BBQ area, but never specify that the pool is salt water.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported for this building. Current MLS data shows washer/dryer in inclusions on 17 of 20 recent listings, and at least one remark explicitly says "washer and dryer" are included in the unit/garage area. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and appears to reflect a real building feature rather than a one-off agent copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit paid-laundry terms such as coin-op, coin laundry, card-operated machines, quarters, or laundry fees. The remarks do not reference community laundry at all, so there is no evidence that laundry is paid.
I looked for language like laundry on each floor, laundry room on every level, or shared laundry facilities on all floors. The public remarks do not mention any community laundry setup, so there is no evidence to support this feature.
No analysis available
Assigned parking is strongly supported across the building. Multiple listings mention a private or attached/detached "2-car garage," "attached 2-car enclosed garage," or similar phrasing, which implies reserved parking tied to the unit. The evidence appears broad across many agents and repeated throughout the remarks.
Covered parking is strongly supported across the remarks and aligns with the historical MLS data. Multiple listings explicitly describe a '2-car garage,' 'attached 2-car enclosed garage,' or 'covered lanai/garage' setup, suggesting this is a consistent building feature rather than isolated copy-paste. Confidence is extremely high.
I looked for explicit deeded/owned parking language such as deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in deed. The listings only describe garages and guest parking, so deeded parking is not supported by the remarks.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee language, including monthly parking charges or parking rental costs. The remarks do not mention any separate parking fee, so the amount cannot be extracted.
Guest parking is well supported by the remarks across many listings, including phrases like 'plentiful guest parking just steps away,' 'guest parking nearby,' and 'lots of guest parking.' The repeated mention across multiple agents suggests this is a real community-level feature, not just an MLS checkbox artifact. Confidence is very high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for parking waitlist or waiting list language. The remarks instead describe ample or plentiful parking, with no indication that residents must join a waitlist.
No analysis available
I searched for key card access, fob access, card readers, or other electronic building entry systems. The remarks mention keypad entry and digital door locks on a unit, but that does not establish a building-wide card/fob security system.
None of the 20 listings’ remarks reference a security guard, 24-hour security, or on-site security staff, even though they highlight many other community amenities. With only 1/20 MLS entries checking the SECGUA box and no textual support, the evidence strongly suggests there is no staffed security guard service at this property and that the lone checkbox is a mistaken entry.
This feature is directly supported by the public remarks. At least one listing explicitly says the community includes security patrol, which is clear evidence for the building.
No analysis available
Central AC is strongly confirmed across the listings and appears to be a building-wide feature rather than a one-off unit upgrade. Well over a dozen listings explicitly mention it, with multiple agents using clear phrases such as "central AC," "central A/C," and "brand-new central A/C," which reinforces the historical MLS pattern rather than suggesting a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no explicit mention of concrete construction in the public remarks. While 7 of 20 current MLS records mark CONCRE, the remarks appear to be generic copy-paste marketing and do not independently verify this building feature.
Double wall construction is strongly supported by the MLS, with 17 of 20 current listings marked DOUWAL. The public remarks do not explicitly mention it, but the consistency across listings makes this a strong building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing remarks explicitly say the building is steel frame or steel frame construction. Although 12 of 20 current MLS records carry STEFRA, the absence of supporting remarks suggests this is likely MLS checkbox data rather than a verified building description.
Concrete slab foundation is not mentioned in the remarks. With only 8 of 20 current MLS records marking SLAB, this remains a weak and unconfirmed signal for the building.
No analysis available
No listings in the supplied remarks explicitly say "wood frame" or "wood frame construction." The current MLS checkbox appears to be a weak, possibly copied data point rather than corroborated building evidence.
Above-ground construction appears in 9 of 20 current MLS listings, which suggests a possible building-level characteristic but not a strong one. Because the remarks are silent and the signal is not widespread, this should be treated as moderate-confidence MLS-only evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR indicators such as short-term rental allowed, vacation rental allowed, NUC, TVU, or owner-occupant-only language. Nothing in the public remarks suggests STRs are permitted, so the safest reading is that STR is not supported by the listings.
I looked specifically for hotel pool references such as hotel rental program, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, or managed-by-hotel wording. None appear, and because STR is not supported, this must remain false.
I searched for language like mandatory rental program, required participation, cannot opt out, or must rent through a pool. There is no evidence of any such program in the remarks, so this is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold terms such as lease expires, ground lease ends, renewed through, or lease expiry year, but found nothing. There is no public remark evidence to identify a lease expiration year.
Public remarks repeatedly advertise VA financing options, including assumable VA loans and one direct statement that the building/community is VA approved. This is strong evidence that VA financing is accepted.
I searched for insurance language such as 'fully insured,' 'full insurance,' 'walls-in coverage,' or 'comprehensive building insurance,' but there were no relevant mentions. The public remarks do discuss HOA/community amenities, yet they do not describe the building’s insurance coverage.
Across the sample, there are 0 clear public-remark mentions of a fire sprinkler system, and the lone MLS checkbox appears isolated. The remarks repeatedly discuss pools, AC, PV, and yard features, but not fire suppression equipment, suggesting the checkbox is likely a copy/paste or mistaken entry rather than a verified building amenity.
I looked for any mention of FLSE, fire/life safety evaluation passed, fire safety certification, life safety compliance, or passed fire inspection, but found nothing in the remarks. With no explicit public remark evidence, this remains unconfirmed and is treated as not indicated.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox data indicates 1 of 20 current listings include a mountain view (view_descriptions='MOUNTA'), but none of the public remarks mention 'mountain', 'Koolau', or 'mauka'—remarks focus on garden, pool, and ocean-area amenities. Evidence for mountain views is minimal and likely an isolated checkbox; included because at least one listing claims it, but confidence is low (only 1/20 listings and no corroborating remarks).
No analysis available
City views are not supported by the current remark set. Across the provided listings, none explicitly describe city/skyline/downtown views, while many describe garden, courtyard, or green-space outlooks instead. The MLS data is mostly NONE, so the lone CITY entry appears weak and possibly copy-paste or mistaken.
No analysis available
Garden views/settings are confirmed in multiple current listings, not just MLS checkboxes. At least 7 listings explicitly reference garden-related outlooks or settings, such as "tropical garden views," "lush courtyard setting," "garden park," and "garden like settings," indicating this is a real building-level feature. The evidence is consistent across multiple remarks and agents, so this appears well established.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no clear evidence that this building offers sunset views. Across the remarks provided, no listing explicitly references sunset, western exposure, or similar view language; the only nearby mention is a generic phrase like "as the sun sets," which is not a building view feature. Current MLS data also shows no SUNSET view descriptions and many listings marked NONE, supporting a false value.
No analysis available
I looked for direct view language like seeing Friday night fireworks from the unit, lanai, or building. The remarks mention garden views, pool proximity, and neighborhood scenery, but nothing about fireworks views.
No analysis available
Seven of the twenty current MLS listings have RESMAN checked in amenities, suggesting the building may have a resident manager or on-site manager. However, across the provided public remarks, there are no explicit references to a resident manager, live-in manager, or building manager on property, so this does not appear strongly confirmed by agent descriptions. The evidence is mixed and may reflect MLS copy/paste rather than firsthand verification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.