Sky Ala Moana East
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Sky Ala Moana East
Building Overview
Sky Ala Moana East in Ala Moana-Kakaako, 2023 concrete/steel building with ocean and mountain views, pool and concierge.
About Sky Ala Moana East
Based on MLS data, Sky Ala Moana East is a 2023 condominium in the Ala Moana-Kakaako neighborhood. The building contains 112 units and is constructed of concrete with a steel frame.
According to available records, the property offers ocean, mountain, and sunset views and includes on-site amenities such as a pool, fitness center, BBQ area, resident manager, concierge, and security guard. Units are served by central air conditioning.
Additional details from MLS indicate parking is available with guest parking provided. Pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are permitted. The management company is listed as unknown. Buyers should verify all information with the listing agent or management, as this summary is based solely on MLS data.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy figures and descriptive language about the share of owner-occupied units, but found none. References to ownership flexibility, owners, or only 112 residences do not indicate occupancy percentage, so the value remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for any direct reference to the number of elevators, including explicit counts and phrases such as 'multiple elevators,' but found none. With no remark evidence and no current verified value provided, the number of elevators remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
Central air inclusion is rarely indicated in MLS (6 of 20) and the extensive current public remarks for the building do not mention 'central AC included' or similar language. Given the low historical signal and lack of any confirming remarks across many listings, central AC-in-fees is omitted.
Cable TV inclusion is strongly supported. The clearest public remark explicitly mentions "comprehensive cable packages," and the MLS also shows CABTV in 13 of 20 listings. Evidence is consistent across the building and appears reliable.
Common-area electricity is reasonably supported by the MLS checkbox pattern, with 13 of 20 listings indicating OTCOEX. The public remarks do not name hallway/elevator electricity directly, but they also do not contradict it. Evidence suggests a shared building expense is likely included, though the wording is mostly implied rather than explicit.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water inclusion is moderately supported by the MLS, with 14 of 20 listings checking HOTWAT. However, 4 listings also include WTRHTR, which weakens certainty because that can indicate unit-supplied water heating rather than building-supplied hot water. Public remarks do not add a clear confirmation either way.
Internet inclusion is strongly confirmed. The MLS shows INTSER in 15 of 20 listings, and one public remark explicitly says fees include "highspeed internet." This is strong evidence and appears consistent across the building.
No analysis available
Sewer appears to be included in maintenance fees. The MLS is strong here, with 16 of 20 listings checking SEWER. Public remarks are mostly silent on the utility breakdown, but there is no evidence suggesting otherwise.
Water inclusion is well supported by the MLS, with 15 of 20 listings indicating WATER. Public remarks do not usually itemize the utilities, but one remark notes fees include "utilities," which is directionally consistent. Overall this looks like a building-level inclusion.
BBQ/grilling facilities are very well supported, with many listings describing "BBQ cabanas" and some mentioning "BBQ areas" or "BBQ" in the amenity list. The feature appears consistently across multiple listings and agents, suggesting it is a real shared amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no meaningful remark support for a clubhouse or community-center style amenity. The current MLS appearance is isolated at 1/20, which suggests this is likely a checkbox inconsistency rather than a true shared feature. Confidence is moderate-high that the building does not offer this as a common amenity.
Concierge service is strongly supported across the listings. Historical MLS data shows 15 of 20 current listings with CONCIE, and remarks explicitly reference "concierge" and "five-star concierge service," along with a "full service hotel lifestyle." This appears to be a real building-wide service consistently reflected by multiple agents.
A dog park or dog area is explicitly mentioned in multiple remarks, including phrases like 'dog park' and 'BBQ, dog park, event rooms.' Even though MLS prevalence is low at 1/20, the direct language suggests the amenity exists and is likely shared.
The building appears to have doorman-style service supported by multiple listings, though the evidence is more indirect than for concierge. Remarks mention a "full-service hotel experience with lobby check-in" and hotel operations with valet, which is consistent with a staffed lobby or lobby attendant. This looks like a building-level service that may be inconsistently copied into MLS data, but the repeated hotel-service language supports including it.
Exercise amenities are strongly supported across the remarks, with many listings referencing a "fitness center," "fitness gym," "gym," and even "dual fitness centers." This appears repeatedly across multiple agents and listing versions, so it does not look like a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
Meeting-room style space appears to be a real building amenity. Several remarks mention 'meeting rooms,' 'event room,' or private event spaces, and the MLS data supports it in 10/20 listings. This is consistent enough to include.
Multiple current remarks support a shared patio/deck-style amenity, including phrases like “expansive amenity deck,” “expansive pool deck,” “massive pool deck,” and “lush outdoor lounge spaces.” Evidence appears across many listings and agents, not just a single copy-paste remark, so the feature is well supported for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building’s recreation/amenity deck is well supported. Current remarks mention an 'expansive recreation deck' and outdoor lounge/recreation spaces, while MLS data shows RECARE in 14/20 listings. This appears to be a real shared amenity rather than a mistaken checkbox.
Some listings mention 'event room', 'event rooms', or similar multi-purpose/rec spaces (few occurrences). Evidence is moderate and scattered—seems building offers event/rec rooms but mentions are less frequent than other amenities.
Restaurant/dining amenities are clearly present in the building remarks, with many listings stating there is an "on-site restaurant" or a restaurant "right downstairs." Some remarks also mention an on-site café/bakery or an upcoming restaurant, which reinforces that the building includes dining services.
No analysis available
Sauna amenities are strongly corroborated by the remarks, which repeatedly mention "dry and steam saunas," "sauna," and "steam room." The consistency across listings and the high MLS amenity rate make this a high-confidence building feature.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, or bike-and-surfboard storage references. None of the listings mention any surfboard storage facilities.
No analysis available
Trash chute is strongly supported by the MLS checkbox data, with 18 of 20 listings showing it. Public remarks rarely call it out, which is normal for this type of building infrastructure, so the high MLS consistency is the main evidence.
Valet service is strongly and repeatedly confirmed across the listing set. Remarks consistently mention “valet service,” “complimentary valet service for owners,” and “free valet parking,” indicating this is a building-level amenity rather than an isolated unit feature.
No analysis available
Whirlpool/spa-style water amenities are strongly supported. Remarks include 'hot tub', 'plunge bath', 'Japanese-style ofuro', and 'spa', which matches the MLS data showing WHIRLP in 14/20 listings. The feature appears repeatedly and with detailed descriptions.
Pool is strongly confirmed for this building. Across the provided remarks, roughly 20+ listings reference it explicitly with phrases like "two pools," "heated pool," "lap pool," "swimming pool," and "expansive pool deck," showing consistent multi-agent confirmation rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
Heated pool is very strongly confirmed at the building level. Many current remarks explicitly describe it using phrases such as "heated pool," "heated and lap pools," and "heated salt water pool," appearing across many listings and agents, which makes the evidence highly reliable.
The remarks directly identify a salt water pool, which is clear evidence for this feature. This is stronger than general pool mentions because the salt-water wording appears explicitly in the listings.
In-unit laundry is strongly and consistently supported for this building. Across dozens of current remarks, agents explicitly say "in-unit washer and dryer," "washer/dryer in unit," and similar phrases, and this matches the MLS inclusions data (20/20 listings). The evidence appears robust and repeated across multiple listings rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I looked for paid-laundry wording such as coin laundry, coin-op, card-operated machines, quarters, or laundry fees. The remarks mention only in-unit washer/dryer and do not describe any paid community laundry facilities.
I searched the public remarks for language like "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," or similar floor-by-floor community laundry references. The listings only mention in-unit washer/dryer, so there is no evidence that community laundry exists on every floor.
Parking is strongly supported across the listings, with many repeated references to valet service and complimentary/free valet parking for owners. At least one listing explicitly mentions a 'one covered parking stall,' while The Flats listings say parking is not included but can be purchased, showing parking access exists in the building. The evidence is consistent across many agents and appears to be building-level rather than a one-off copy-paste detail.
Parking assigned appears to be supported by the listing remarks, with several references to a specific stall per unit such as 'one covered parking stall' and 'eligible to purchase one parking stall.' The evidence suggests unit-level assigned/reserved parking rather than a general parking amenity.
No analysis available
I searched for deeded/owned parking language such as deeded stall, parking included in the deed, or owned parking, and found none. The remarks instead indicate parking is optional and separately purchasable, which is inconsistent with deeded parking.
No analysis available
I looked for a recurring monthly parking charge, rental fee, or additional parking cost, but found no monthly fee in the remarks. The only parking references are one-time purchase prices, so a monthly parking fee cannot be determined from the listings.
No listings explicitly describe guest or visitor parking, while several only mention valet service, valet parking, or complimentary valet for owners. That pattern suggests the MLS guest-parking checkbox may be reflecting valet operations rather than actual guest parking availability.
Current MLS data shows multiple agents marking SECENT for this building’s parking, and all descriptions frame it as a hotel-style, valet-operated garage rather than open public parking. In this type of high-rise condotel, garage access is usually controlled by staff and security systems. Together, this provides solid evidence that parking has secured entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist language such as waitlist, waiting list, or join a list for parking, and found nothing. The remarks discuss parking availability and purchase pricing, but not a waitlist system.
No analysis available
I searched for key card, fob access, card reader, keycard entry, or other electronic access-control wording. The listings mention security and 24-hour security, but they do not mention card/fob access.
Security guard service is supported by both the MLS history and the public remarks. One listing explicitly says "24-hour security," and the building’s hotel-residence positioning with valet and concierge-style services aligns with on-site security personnel. Evidence appears consistent rather than copy-paste-only, though the explicit security mention appears in only a small number of remarks.
I looked for patrol-related wording such as security patrol, roving security, or a patrolled building. The remarks mention 24-hour security, concierge, and valet, but nothing about a security patrol service.
No analysis available
Strong historical evidence supports central air conditioning for this building. The MLS history shows 16 of 20 listings tagged with ACCEN/CENAC, while the current remarks do not provide any contrary evidence. The repeated luxury hotel/condotel marketing appears consistent across multiple listings, and there is no sign of a legitimate change that would warrant removing the feature.
No analysis available
No public remarks in this set mention window air conditioning, and none describe window units or wall AC. The only support is a small amount of current MLS checkbox activity (4/20 listings), which appears more consistent with copy-paste/checkbox noise than with a verified building feature.
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS pattern, with 17 of 20 listings coded CONCRE. The public remarks do not explicitly mention construction type, so this appears to be MLS-backed building data rather than agent copy/paste commentary. Confidence remains very high because the current listing pattern is consistent across the building.
Double-wall construction appears in 14 of 20 current MLS listings as DOUWAL. Public remarks do not directly mention 'double wall,' but the MLS coverage is strong enough to treat it as a likely building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Steel-frame construction is supported by the current MLS pattern, with 16 of 20 listings coded STEFRA. The public remarks do not explicitly discuss structure, so there is no conflicting text to weaken the MLS evidence. This is a strong building-level attribute and likely reflects consistent MLS entry across multiple agents.
Concrete slab construction is not supported by the public remarks, and only 2 of 20 current MLS listings check SLAB. The absence of any mentions like 'concrete slab' or 'solid concrete foundation' across the listing remarks suggests this is not a reliable building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Above-ground construction is not supported by the remarks, and only 3 of 20 current MLS listings currently check ABOGRO. With no corroborating language from multiple agents, this looks like a weak or mistaken MLS entry rather than a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks consistently describe the building as a condotel/hotel-condo with flexible use and short-term rental capability. Several listings explicitly say owners can participate in the hotel rental program, and one calls it a 'legal short-term rental,' so STR is supported.
I looked for references to a hotel rental pool or managed hotel program, and found many. The listings repeatedly state that the building participates in a hotel rental program/pool, so this feature is strongly supported.
I checked for any indication that hotel pool participation is mandatory, but the remarks consistently describe it as optional. Multiple listings explicitly note owners can opt out or choose a combination of personal use and hotel program participation, so mandatory participation is ruled out.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold language such as lease expires, ground lease ends, renewed through, or a specific expiration year, but found nothing. The remarks do not provide any lease tenure or expiry information.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA loan approval language and found none. Because there is no public-remarks evidence confirming VA eligibility, this remains unverified and is treated as not supported by the listings.
I searched for insurance-related wording that would indicate the HOA provides full or walls-in coverage, but there were no such statements. Because the remarks do not mention full insurance coverage and no current value is provided, this is marked false with moderate confidence.
Fire sprinkler coverage appears to be a building-level amenity for this property. MLS history shows FIRSPR in 19 of 20 listings, which is overwhelming evidence despite public remarks not calling it out. The pattern looks consistent across many listings and agents, suggesting the checkbox data is likely reliable rather than copy-paste noise.
I reviewed the remarks for any fire/life safety evaluation or fire inspection pass statements, including FLSE-related wording, and found nothing. Since there is no current positive value and no public remark evidence, I am marking this as false with moderate confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are strongly confirmed building-wide. At least 15+ listings in the remarks mention ocean-facing or ocean view language, including phrases like 'stunning ocean views,' 'very nice ocean views,' 'sparkling Pacific Ocean,' and 'million dollar views of the ocean.' This appears across multiple agents and unit types, not as isolated copy-paste.
Mountain views are well established across the building and are mentioned in many separate listings. The remarks include direct references to 'mountains,' 'Ko'olau Mountain Range,' and 'city and mountain views,' showing consistent confirmation from multiple agents. This aligns with the high-confidence historical data.
Diamond Head views are confirmed by several explicit remarks even though the current MLS checkbox appears in only 1/20 listings. The clearest phrasing includes 'Diamond Head views' and 'breathtaking panoramic sweep of Diamond Head,' which indicates genuine view inventory rather than a one-off error. Evidence is moderate-to-strong and comes from multiple listing descriptions.
City views are extremely well confirmed across the building. Numerous listings mention 'city views,' 'Honolulu skyline,' 'cityscape,' and 'urban living,' often alongside mountain and ocean views. The consistency across many remarks and the near-universal MLS confirmation make this a very high-confidence building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderate evidence some units have sunrise/morning exposure: only 1 of 20 current listings lists SUNRIS, but multiple public remarks specifically say 'wake up to golden sunrises', 'sweeping sunrise', and describe east-facing units. This suggests sunrise views exist for some units, but the feature appears limited to a small subset of listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
This is direct unit-level confirmation that fireworks are visible from the residence. Multiple listings explicitly say the fireworks can be enjoyed from the unit/living and dining room, which is strong evidence for this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence for a resident manager is limited and indirect. Only 5 of 20 listings have RESMAN checked, and the public remarks do not explicitly mention a resident manager; they instead emphasize hotel-style operations, concierge, valet, and on-site services. This suggests the checkbox may be a partial copy-paste carryover or a loosely interpreted amenity rather than clearly verified on-site management.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.